Phytotherapy in Lactococcosis in Aquaculture: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Lindsay Dong and Version 1 by Mehdi Soltani.

Lactococcosis, particularly that caused by Lactococcus garvieae, is a major re-emerging bacterial disease seriously affecting the sustainability of aquaculture industry. Medicinal herbs and plants do not have very much in vitro antagonism and in vivo disease resistance towards lactococcosis agents in aquaculture. Most in vitro studies with herbal extractives were performed against L. garvieae with no strong antibacterial activity, but essential oils, especially those that contain thymol or carvacrol, are more effective. 

  • lactococcosis
  • Lactococcus garvieae
  • phytotherapy
  • aquaculture

1. Introduction

Among the species of Lactococcus genus, L. L. garvieaegarvieae has been highlighted as one of the most serious global bacterial pathogens in the aquaculture sector, both in freshwater and marine fish, especially at water temperatures of >15 °C, but L. lactis and L. L. pisciumpiscium seem to be limited to some highly valuable aquaculture species, such as salmonids and sturgeons, at various water temperatures [11,22,23][1][2][3]. Due to the widespread sources of the bacterial agents and disease spreading, as well as the heterogenicity of the bacterial stains implicated in the disease outbreaks, both vaccination and chemotherapy require more attention in future. The application of co-friendly environmental substances, such as medicinal herbs and probiotics, are nowadays a potential best alternative to antibiotic therapy and an immune enhancer against such bacterial diseases.

2. Diseases Caused by Lactococcus Members in Aquaculture

2.1. Disease Caused by L. garvieae

Lactococcosis, caused by L. garvieae, is a systemic hyperacute bacterial disease causing general hemorrhagic symptoms in susceptible aquatic organisms [24,25]. Based on their ability to agglutinate serum raised against L. garvieae, there are two groups of bacterial serotypes: non-agglutinating (KG−) and agglutinating (KG+) phenotypes [26]. The affected fish first become relatively anorexic, with a visible darkening of skin color, showing sluggish movement and abnormal behaviors, such as erratic and spiral swimming [11,24]. In the later stages of the disease the affected fish display signs of swollen abdomen, anal prolapsus, lateral or bilateral exophthalmia (

2.1. Disease Caused by L. garvieae

Lactococcosis, caused by L. garvieae, is a systemic hyperacute bacterial disease causing general hemorrhagic symptoms in susceptible aquatic organisms [4][5]. Based on their ability to agglutinate serum raised against L. garvieae, there are two groups of bacterial serotypes: non-agglutinating (KG−) and agglutinating (KG+) phenotypes [6]. The affected fish first become relatively anorexic, with a visible darkening of skin color, showing sluggish movement and abnormal behaviors, such as erratic and spiral swimming [1][4]. In the later stages of the disease the affected fish display signs of swollen abdomen, anal prolapsus, lateral or bilateral exophthalmia (
Figure 1
A,B), cataracts (
Figure 1C), congestion of the internal organs, spleen and liver enlargement, accumulation of turbid ascitic fluid in the peritoneal cavity, and the presence of exudates in the brain [11,22,27,28]. Acute hyperemia and or extensive hemorrhage and petechiae of the organs, including the mucosal layers of the intestine, can also be seen in the diseased fish (
C), congestion of the internal organs, spleen and liver enlargement, accumulation of turbid ascitic fluid in the peritoneal cavity, and the presence of exudates in the brain [1][2][7][8]. Acute hyperemia and or extensive hemorrhage and petechiae of the organs, including the mucosal layers of the intestine, can also be seen in the diseased fish (
Figure 1
F), and in some cases the diseased fish show signs of explosion in the eyes prior to the loss of their eyes (
Figure 1D,E) [11,22,29]. In advanced forms of the disease, a Gram stain preparation of hematopoietic tissue imprints, including spleen and kidney, can exhibit huge numbers of Gram-positive coccoid cells in single or chain forms (
D,E) [1][2][9]. In advanced forms of the disease, a Gram stain preparation of hematopoietic tissue imprints, including spleen and kidney, can exhibit huge numbers of Gram-positive coccoid cells in single or chain forms (
Figure 1
G).
Vetsci 08 00181 g001 550
Figure 1.
Rainbow trout growing in race ways and affected by L. garvieae showing: (
A
) typical bilateral exophthalmia and no change in the color skin, (
B
) typical bilateral exophthalmia and beginning of skin color change, (
C
) typical cataract and dark color, (
D
) bilateral exophthalmia and a complete loss of the eye, (
E
) darkening of body and an explosion of the eye, (
F
) hemorrhage of intestine, (
G) direct Gram stain preparation of spleen of diseased fish showing huge numbers of Gram-positive coccoid cells confirmed as L. garvieae by phenotyping and molecular works. (photos by Professor Mehdi Soltani).
Pericarditis, peritonitis and meningitis, diffuse hemorrhage in the sclera of the eye, focal necrosis in the spleen and clumps of bacteria, hemorrhage in serosa of the swim bladder and in the interstitium of the skeletal muscles, degeneration and necrosis in epithelia of the stomach glands and their lumens full of necrotic material are among the identified histopathological findings in lactococcosis infection caused by L. garvieae [30,31,32]. Vascular changes in spleen and kidneys [33] and degenerations in the tubular epithelium with an increase in the melano-macrophage centers, hemorrhage in the form of a hematoma covering the myocardium and the bulbus arteriosa, petechial hemorrhage, vascular change, degeneration and necrosis are major histopathological findings. Lipid and ell infiltration in the liver, hemorrhage and vascular change in muscles, and petechial hemorrhage and edema in the gills are further microscopic changes reported in the infected fish by L. garvieae [31]. The severity of such pathological changes is, however, varied and depended on various factors, including level of virulent of bacterial strain, fish species and size and level of health management criteria, such as water temperature.
Evidence of bacterial cells in fish macrophage in tissues of spleen, kidney, heart (endothelial), and peritoneum are evidence of a septicemic condition, suggesting that macrophages play a key role in the host immune response to L. garvieae infection. However, intra-macrophage resistance of the bacteria can cause a spread of the pathogen to all tissues of fish by macrophages. Further, as in the young fish phagocytosis by macrophage activation may not be sufficient, thus, pathogenesis is a determinant factor, and the disease can progress.
Several factors play roles in the virulence of L. garvieae. Polysaccharide capsule is the major virulence factor in L. garvieae infection [29]. The capsulated strains resist to phagocytosis, but some non-capsulated strains are pathogenic in fish causing high mortality in rainbow trout [34], thus, the bacterial capsule may not the sole determinant of the bacterial pathogenicity. Haemolytic toxin is known to cause mortality in fish via intramuscular injection and an intracellular toxin with a low leukocidal activity reported by the bacterial isolates recovered from the diseased fish [35]. Plasmids of the virulent isolates contain a protein with an enzymatic domain corresponding to the family of actin-ADP-ribosyltransferases [36] that can kill eukaryotic cells by transferring ADP-ribose to essential proteins [37]. The toxicity of this protein in fish however, warranted future research works. The presence of a putative set of virulence factor genes (hly1, hly2, hly3, nox, sod, pavA, psaA), and proteins of enolase, lactate dehydrogenase phosphoenolpyruvate-protein phosphotransferase with roles in adhesion, cytolytic activity, oxidative stress tolerance, and metal homeostasis have been detected in strains of L. garvieae, including the avirulent reference strains ATCC
) direct Gram stain preparation of spleen of diseased fish showing huge numbers of Gram-positive coccoid cells confirmed as L. garvieae by phenotyping and molecular works. (photos by Professor Mehdi Soltani).
Pericarditis, peritonitis and meningitis, diffuse hemorrhage in the sclera of the eye, focal necrosis in the spleen and clumps of bacteria, hemorrhage in serosa of the swim bladder and in the interstitium of the skeletal muscles, degeneration and necrosis in epithelia of the stomach glands and their lumens full of necrotic material are among the identified histopathological findings in lactococcosis infection caused by L. garvieae [10][11][12]. Vascular changes in spleen and kidneys [13] and degenerations in the tubular epithelium with an increase in the melano-macrophage centers, hemorrhage in the form of a hematoma covering the myocardium and the bulbus arteriosa, petechial hemorrhage, vascular change, degeneration and necrosis are major histopathological findings. Lipid and ell infiltration in the liver, hemorrhage and vascular change in muscles, and petechial hemorrhage and edema in the gills are further microscopic changes reported in the infected fish by L. garvieae [11]. The severity of such pathological changes is, however, varied and depended on various factors, including level of virulent of bacterial strain, fish species and size and level of health management criteria, such as water temperature.
Evidence of bacterial cells in fish macrophage in tissues of spleen, kidney, heart (endothelial), and peritoneum are evidence of a septicemic condition, suggesting that macrophages play a key role in the host immune response to L. garvieae infection. However, intra-macrophage resistance of the bacteria can cause a spread of the pathogen to all tissues of fish by macrophages. Further, as in the young fish phagocytosis by macrophage activation may not be sufficient, thus, pathogenesis is a determinant factor, and the disease can progress.
Several factors play roles in the virulence of L. garvieae. Polysaccharide capsule is the major virulence factor in L. garvieae infection [9]. The capsulated strains resist to phagocytosis, but some non-capsulated strains are pathogenic in fish causing high mortality in rainbow trout [14], thus, the bacterial capsule may not the sole determinant of the bacterial pathogenicity. Haemolytic toxin is known to cause mortality in fish via intramuscular injection and an intracellular toxin with a low leukocidal activity reported by the bacterial isolates recovered from the diseased fish [15]. Plasmids of the virulent isolates contain a protein with an enzymatic domain corresponding to the family of actin-ADP-ribosyltransferases [16] that can kill eukaryotic cells by transferring ADP-ribose to essential proteins [17]. The toxicity of this protein in fish however, warranted future research works. The presence of a putative set of virulence factor genes (hly1, hly2, hly3, nox, sod, pavA, psaA), and proteins of enolase, lactate dehydrogenase phosphoenolpyruvate-protein phosphotransferase with roles in adhesion, cytolytic activity, oxidative stress tolerance, and metal homeostasis have been detected in strains of L. garvieae, including the avirulent reference strains ATCC
®
49156 and ATCC
® 4392, isolates from diseased rainbow trout in Turkey, France, Iran, Spain, and Italy [38], and fish pathogenic non-capsulated strains in South Africa [6]. These virulence lifestyle factors can indirectly contribute to host tissue damage through aiding in the infection process by evasion of the host’s innate immunity, systemic invasion, cofactor homeostasis, and spreading in the host and adhesion to host tissues. Further research works need to be directed studying the differential expression of virulence lifestyle and true virulence genes during growth in the host environment. Additionally, more studies need to assess the specific virulence factors responsible for the pathogenicity of L. garvieae, as putative virulence factor genes are present in both the fish pathogenic isolates and the avirulent isolates.

2.2. Diseases Caused by Other Species of Lactococcus Genus

L. lactis

4392, isolates from diseased rainbow trout in Turkey, France, Iran, Spain, and Italy [18], and fish pathogenic non-capsulated strains in South Africa [19]. These virulence lifestyle factors can indirectly contribute to host tissue damage through aiding in the infection process by evasion of the host’s innate immunity, systemic invasion, cofactor homeostasis, and spreading in the host and adhesion to host tissues. Further research works need to be directed studying the differential expression of virulence lifestyle and true virulence genes during growth in the host environment. Additionally, more studies need to assess the specific virulence factors responsible for the pathogenicity of L. garvieae, as putative virulence factor genes are present in both the fish pathogenic isolates and the avirulent isolates.

2.2. Diseases Caused by Other Species of Lactococcus Genus

L. lactis strains are genetically classified into four subspecies of lactis, cremoris, tractae, and hordniae [13][20]. It is not a common veterinary pathogen, although it can cause cattle mastitis and be involved in septic arthritis of the neonatal calf. For example, several variants of L. L. lactislactis have been associated with bovine mastitis [79][21]. In humans, it has been reported as a cause of endocarditis, arthritis, and septicemia in patients, although this requires more clarification [80,81,82,83,84][22][23][24][25][26].

Up to date, there are only four reports of lactococcosis by L. L. lactislactis in an aquatic organisms. The first report was an outbreak of white tail disease in cultured giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) in Taiwan [85][27]. The affected prawns were cloudy and whitish in the muscles, showing remarkable edema and necrosis and inflammation in the muscles and hepatopancreas. In subsequent report by Chen et al. [3] [23]L. L. lactislactis subsp. Lactis was isolated from affected hybrid sturgeon, Bester (Huso huso x Acipenser ruthenus) with signs of anorexia, pale body color, reddish spots on the abdomen, enteritis, enlarged abdomen, rapid respiration rate ascites, and 70%–100% mortality. Microscopically, the affected sturgeons demonstrated extensive haemorrhagic multifocal necrotic foci of spleen and liver with degeneration of hepatic cells, lipid droplets and glycogen granules, necrosis and renal tubule epithelial swelling and hydropic degeneration in kidney, skin ulcers deep in underling muscles, appearance of present of immunocompetent cells in the stomach, and small focus on tips of gills and on the myocardium [23][3]. No histopathological changes were, however seen in the eyeball, cerebrum and meninges of affected fish. The third report was from silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) with extensive skin lesions near the caudal peduncle and musculoskeletal lesion in the USA [86][28]. The fourth outbreak of infection by L. L. lactislactis has been reported as the cause of endocarditis valvularis, parientalis thromboticans in mature allis shad (Alosa alosa) in Europe in 2018 that could be associated with the stressors, such as capturing, transport, breeding, and low oxygen level [87][29]. Although, in some cases the disease was reproduced experimentally, the mechanisms of pathogenesis by L. lactis in aquatic animals warranted future research works.

3. Phytotherapy of Lactococcosis in Aquaculture

3.1. In Vitro Studies

Almost all in vitro studies with vegetable and lichens extractives were performed against L. garvieae. For convenience, details of in vitro and in vivo studies have been included in
Table 1
and
Table 2. Overall, extracts do not show strong antibacterial activity against L. garvieae, but essential oils are more effective, mainly those that contain thymol or carvacrol. There are some differences on minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations for the same extractive in different studies (
. Overall, extracts do not show strong antibacterial activity against L. garvieae, but essential oils are more effective, mainly those that contain thymol or carvacrol. There are some differences on minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations for the same extractive in different studies (Table 1).
Table 1).

3.2. In Vivo Studies

. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (μg mL−1 or μL mL−1) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (μg mL−1 or μL mL−1) of plant and lichen extractives against Lactococcus garvieae. The portion of the plant used to prepare the extractives were cited only if stated in the studies. Note: The MIC50 and MIC90 of 15 antibiotics against 146 strains of L. garvieae isolated from diseased fish are also given at the end of the table.
Origin/

Source of L. garvieae
PlantExtractiveMajor CompoundsMIC
Letters a and b showing MIC50 and MIC90, respectively. Table 2. Efficacy of medicinal herbs and plants on the survival of aquatic animals infected with Lactococcus garvieae. The portion of the plant used to prepare the extractives were cited only if stated in the studies.
HostPlantExtractiveDosage/DurationMBCSurvival Increase Compared to Control (%) Reference
2Reference
Rainbow troutCamellia sinensis (green tea-leaves)Methanolic extractUnknown8001100Akbary, 2014
Giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium

rosenbergii)
Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth-leaves)Hot-water extract1 g kg diet−1, 12 days

2 g kg diet−1, 12 days

3 g kg diet−1, 12 days
↑57.3

↑128.6

↑171.4
Chang et al., 2013Rainbow troutThymus vulgaris (thyme), Origanum vulgare (oregano) and Eucalyptus sp.Mix-oil®
Giant freshwater prawn

(M. rosenbergii)
(essential oils from leaves)Citraconic anhydride, 1, 8-cineole, thymol6.2512.5Eichhornia crassipes (leaves)Powder20 g kg diet−1, 120 days↑44.3Amiri et al., 2020
Chang et al., 2016UnknownGlycyrrhiza glabra L. (black sugar-root)n-hexane extractUnknownUnknown5630Asan-Ozusaglam et al., 2014
  Hot-water extract20 g kg diet−1, 120 days↑89.0 UnknownGlycyrrhiza glabra L. (root)Dichloromethane extractUnknownUnknown1410Asan-Ozusaglam et al., 2014
  Aqueous extract 12 g kg diet−1, 120 days↑89.0 Type culture collectionLavandula angustifolia (lavender)Essential oilUnknown500UnknownBaba, 2020
Type culture collectionEugenia caryophyllusEssential oil
  Dreg of aqueous extract 118 g kg diet−1, 120 days↑77.7 Unknown250
Giant freshwater prawn

(M. rosenbergii)
Musa acuminate (banana-peel)UnknownAqueous extract1 g kg diet−1, 120 days

3 g kg dietBaba, 2020
−1, 120 days

6 g kg diet−1, 120 days↑200

↑300

↑467
Rattanavichai et al., 2015Rainbow troutMentha piperitae (pepper mint)Essential oilUnknown500UnknownBaba, 2020
Giant freshwater prawn

(M. rosenbergii)
Morinda cutrifolia (noni)Aqueous extract0.6 g kg diet−1, 21 days

3 g kg diet−1, 21 days

6 g kg diet−1, 21 days
↑250

↑50.4

NS
Halim et al., 2017Rainbow troutRosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)Essential oilUnknown500Unknown
Nile tilapia

(Oreochromis niloticus)
Argania spinosa (argan-seeds)Baba, 2020
Oil5 mL kg diet−1, 45 days

10 mL kg diet−1, 45 days

20 mL kg diet−1, 45 days
↑66.7

↑91.7

↑86.1
Baba et al., 2017Rainbow troutCinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamon)Essential oil
Rainbow trout

Unknown(Oncorhynchus mykiss)Lentinula edodes (Shiitake mushroom)Aqueous extract10 g kg diet−1250UnknownBaba, 2020
, 45 days

20 g kg diet−1, 45 days↑79.0

↑109.7
Baba et al., 2015Rainbow troutNigella sativa (black cumin)Essential oilUnknown250UnknownBaba, 2020
Rainbow trout

(O. mykiss)
Pleurotus ostreatus (oyster mushroom)Aqueous extract10 g kg diet−1, 42 days

20 g kg diet−1, 42 days
↑40.0

↑60.1
Uluköy et al., 2016Strain O41
Rainbow troutLavandula officinalis (true lavender-flowers)

Ethanolic extract
(O. mykiss)Usnea barbata (beard lichen)Methanolic extractEssential oil (linalyl acetate), tannins,

coumarins, flavonoids, and phytosterols
42008400Bulfon et al., 2014
230 mg kg fish−1 (a)

460 mg kg fish−1 (a)

690 mg kg fish−1 (a)
↑62.4

↑45.3

NS
Bilen et al., 2019Strain O41Melissa officinalis (lemon balm-leaves)Ethanolic extractRosmarinic acid, essential oil (citral,

citronellal, β-caryophyllen), caffeic acid, and chlorogenic acidderivatives
840033,600Bulfon et al., 2014
Strain O41Ocimum basilicum (sweet basil-flowering plant)Ethanolic extractEssential oil (linalool, estragol, camphor, eugenol, ocimene, cineol, sesquiterpenes), tannins, favonoids, caffeic acid, and esculoside
Three spotted tilapia (Oreochromis andersonii)CapsaicinIsolated compound1.97 mg kg fish−1 (b)80% survival vs. 0% survival in controlNdashe et al., 202016,800UnknownBulfon et al., 2014
Rainbow trout

(O. mykiss)
Origanum onites (oregano)Essential oil0.125 mL kg diet−1, 56 days

1.5 mL kg diet−1, 56 days

2.5 mL kg diet−1, 56 days

3.0 mL kg diet−1, 56 days
↑54

↑92

↑84

No mortality
Diler et al. 2017Strain O41Origanum vulgare (oregano-inflorescence)Ethanolic extractCarvacrol, thymol, γ-terpinene, p-cymene, limonene, linolool, and borneol420033,600Bulfon et al., 2014
Nile tilapia

(Oreochromis niloticus)
Syzygium aromaticum (clove-buds)Essential oil5 mL kg diet−1, 5 days

10 mL kg diet−1, 5 days

20 mL kg diet−1, 5 days

30 mL kg diet−1, 5 days
↑40

↑70

↑80

No mortality
Rattanachaikunsopon et al., 2009Strain O41Orthosiphon stamineus (Java tea-leaves)Ethanolic extractEssential oil (sesquiterpenes), flavones, triterpenoid, saponins, vitamins, and organic salts
Mullet (Mugil cephalus)* TCMAqueous extract of the powder5 g kg fish−1, 28 days

33,600
UnknownBulfon et al., 2014
10 g kg fish−1, 28 days

20 g kg fish−1, 28 days
NS

↑230.8

↑184.6
Choi et al., 2014Strain O41Rosmarinus officinalis (leaves)Ethanolic extractEssential oil (eucalyptol, α-pinene, camphor, borneol), flavonoids, rosmarinic acid, and terpenes8400UnknownBulfon et al., 2014
Rainbow trout

(O. mykiss)
Citrus paradisi (grapefruit), Citrus reticulata (tangerine), Citrus aurantium ssp. bergamia (bergamot), Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Biocitro ® (blend of these extracts)0.75 g kg diet−1Strain O41Salvia officinalis (sage-leaves)Ethanolic extractEssential oil (thujone, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes), tannins, bitter substances, and flavonoids420033,600Bulfon et al., 2014
Strain O41Thymus vulgaris (leaves)Ethanolic extractEssential oil (thymol, carvacrol, p-cimol, and terpinene), tannins, flavonoids and triterpenesUnknownUnknownBulfon et al., 2014
Strain O41Vaccinium vitis-idaea (lingonberry-leaves)Ethanolic extractPhenolic glycosides (arbutin and hydroquinone), tannins, flavonoids (iperoside, avicularin, isoquercitrin), terpenic acids (ursolic and oleanolic acids), organic acids, and mineral salts4200UnknownBulfon et al., 2014
Rainbow troutGlycyrrhiza glabra L. (root)Ethanolic extractUnknown920UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutPeganum harmala (wild rue-seed)Methanolic extracUnknown105UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
, 28 daysRainbow troutTrachyspermum copticum (carum ajowan-seed)Ethanolic extractUnknown453UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutMyrtus communis (myrtle-leaves)Essential oilUnknown672UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutJuglans regia (English walnut-leaves)Ethanolic extractUnknown510UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutQuercus branti Lindley (Brant’s oak-seed)Ethanolic extractUnknown978UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutTanacetum parthenium (feverfew-leaves)Essential oilUnknown824UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutSatureja bachtiarica Bung. (savory-leaves)Essential oilUnknown126UnknownFereidouni et al., 2013
Rainbow troutGlycyrrhiza glabra L.(root)Ethanolic extractGlycyrrhizinic acid>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutSatureja bachtiarica Bung. (aerial parts)Essential oilPhenols: Carvacrol, thymol816Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutSatureja bachtiarica Bung. (aerial parts)Ethanolic extractPhenols: Carvacrol, thymol>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutPunica granatum (pomegranate-flowers)Ethanolic extractPolyphenols: pomegranatate>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutQuercus branti Lindley (seed/flour)Ethanolic extractTannins>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutEchinophora platyloba DC. (prickly parsnip-aerial parts)Essential oilMonoterpenes: trans-β-ocimene>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutEchinophora platyloba DC. (aerial parts)Ethanolic extractMonoterpenes: trans-β-ocimene>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutHeracleum lasiopetalum Boiss. (fruits)Ethanolic extractSesquiterpene hydrocarbons: Germacrene-D>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow

trout
Kelussia odoratissima Mozaff. (wild celery-leaves)Ethanolic extractZ-ligustilide>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutStachys lavandulifolia Vahl (wood betony-flowers)Ethanolic extractSabinene, α-pinene, β-myrcene>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutThymus daenensis Celak. (common thyme-aerial part/inflorescence)Ethanolic extractPhenols: thymol, carvacrol>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutThymus daenensis Celak. (Aerial part/inflorescence)Essential oilPhenols: thymol, carvacrol816Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutMyrtus communis (leaves)Ethanolic extractα-pinene, 1,8-cineole, myrtenyl acetate>250>500Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutMyrtus communis (leaves)Essential oilα-pinene, 1,8-cineole, myrtenyl acetate>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutThymbra spicata (spiked thyme-aerial part/inflorescence)Essential oilPhenols: thymol, carvacrol816Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutBunium persicum (Boiss.) K.-

Pol. (black caraway-fruits)
Essential oilγ-terpinen-7-al, cuminaldehyde, γ terpinene816Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutTeucrium polium (felty germander-aerial parts)Essential oilα-pinene, linalool>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutAlhagi maurorum (camelthorn-aerial parts)Essential oilAlhagidin, alhagitin, quercetin, catechin>1000>1000Goudarzi et al., 2011
Rainbow troutZataria multifora Boiss. (Shirazi thyme)Essential oilPhenols: thymol, carvacrol48Goudarzi et al., 2011
Olive flounder (P. olivaceus)Zingiber officinale (ginger)Essential oil 20002000Hossain et al., 2019
L. garvieae GQ850376Eucalyptus globulus (southern blue gum-aerial parts)Essential oil1,8-eucalypol, pinene, terpineol acetae, globulol250250Mahmoodi et al., 2012
L. garvieae GQ850376Eucalyptus globulus (aerial parts)Methanolic extract1,8-eucalypol, pinene, terpineol acetae, globulol500500Mahmoodi et al., 2012
L. garvieae GQ850376Zataria multiflora (aerial parts)Essential oilphenolic monoterpene, Carvacrol, alpha-pinene7.815.6Mahmoodi et al., 2012
L. garvieae GQ850376Zataria multiflora (aerial parts)Methanolic extractphenolic monoterpene Carvacrol, alpha-pinene15.615.6Mahmoodi et al., 2012
L. garvieae GQ850376Anethum graveolens (dill-seed)Essential oilD-carvacrol, limonene, dill apiole, E-dihydrocarvone, Z-dihydrocarvone62.4125Mahmoodi et al., 2012L. garvieae GQ850376Anethum graveolens (seed)Methanolic extractD-carvacrol, limonene, dill apiole, E-dihydrocarvone, Z-dihydrocarvone125125Mahmoodi et al., 2012
↑120L. garvieae GQ850376Rosmarinus officinalisEssential oil1,8-cineole, alpha-pinene, toluene15.631.2Mahmoodi et al., 2012
L. garvieae GQ850376Rosmarinus officinalisMethanolic extract1,8-cineole, alpha-pinene, toluene31.231.2Mahmoodi et al., 2012
Rainbow troutCitrus paradisi (grapefruit), Citrus reticulata (tangerine), Citrus aurantium ssp. bergamia (bergamot), Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Biocitro ® (blend of citrus extracts)Ascorbic acid, citrus bioflavonoids (hesperidin, naringin, quercetin, rutin) and organic acids2.0UnknownMora-Sánchez et al., 2020
Mora-Sánchez et al., 2020Tilapia (O. andersonii)Capsicum annum (Chili pepper)Methanolic extract (capsaicin)UnknownUnknown196.7Ndashe et al., 2020
Olive flounderCitrus aurantifolia (key lime-peel)Essential oilLimonene, γ-terpinene, β-pinene0.125% (v/v)1% (v/v)Pathirana et al., 2018
Olive flounderLimoneneCommercial trans-limonene (>99%)Limonene0.031% (v/v)0.025% (v/v)Pathirana et al., 2018
Olive flounderSyzygium aromaticum (clove-buds)Essential oilEugenol, β-caryophyllene, α-humulen, eugenyl-acetate0.5% (v/v)1% (v/v)Pathirana et al., 2019a
Olive flounderCommercial eugenol (>99%)Isolated compound

eugenol
Eugenol1% (v/v)1% (v/v)Pathirana et al., 2019a
Olive flounderCinnamomum zeylanicumEssential oilCinnamaldehyde, eugenol,

β-Caryophyllene
0.015% (v/v)0.031% (v/v)Pathirana et al., 2019b
Olive flounderCommercial trans-cinnamaldehyde (>99%) (Sigma-Aldrich)cinnamaldehydeCinnamaldehyde0.003% (v/v)0.015% (v/v)Pathirana et al., 2019b
Rainbow troutArgania spinose L. (argan-oil)Essential oilOleic acid, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid250UnknownÖntas et al., 2016
Rainbow troutCitrus limon L. (lemon-peel)Essential oilLimonene, γ-terpinene, β-pinene, α-terpineol, myrecene and terpinolene500UnknownÖntas et al., 2016
Strain ATCC43921Cinnamomum verum (cinnamon-bark)Essential oilUnknown120UnknownRattanachaikunsopon et al., 2009
Strain ATCC43921Ocimum sanctum (holy basil-leaves)Essential oilUnknown240UnknownRattanachaikunsopon et al., 2009
Strain ATCC43921Zingiber officinale (roots)Essential oilUnknown120UnknownRattanachaikunsopon et al. 2009
Strain ATCC43921Syzygium aromaticum (flower buds)Essential oilUnknown30UnknownRattanachaikunsopon et al., 2009
Rainbow troutZataria multiflora (aerial parts)Essential oilCarvacrol, benzene and phenol0.120.12Soltani et al., 2014
Rainbow troutAllium sativum (garlic-edible parts)Essential oiltrisulfide, di-2-propenyl, disulfide, di-2-propenyl and trisulfide, methyl 2-propenyl0.51Soltani et al., 2014
Rainbow troutCinnamomum zeylanicum (bark)Essential oilcinnamic aldehyde, linalool, ortho methoxy cinnamic aldehyde and 1,8-cineole0.50.5Soltani et al., 2014
S. quinqueradiataChloramphenicol  0.8 a1.6 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataCiprofloxacin  1.6 a3.13 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataErythromycin  0.1 a800 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataEnoxacin  6.25 a12.5 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataFlorfenicol  1.6 a1.6 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataFloroxacin  12.5 a12.5 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataKanamycin  25 a50 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataLincomycin  25 a800 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataNorfloxacin  6.25 a12.5 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataOxolinic acid  400 a800 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataOrbifloxacin  1.6 a1.6 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataOfloxacin  3.13 a6.25 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataPenzylpenicillin  0.8 a1.6 bMaki et al., 2008S. quinqueradiataStreptomycin  25 a50 bMaki et al., 2008
S. quinqueradiataTetracycline  12.5 a400 bMaki et al., 2008
1 Aqueous extract was the supernatant of the hot-water extract filtered and centrifuged. The left filtered product and sediment were the dreg of aqueous extract. 2 survival increase calculated by the equation: (survival treatment × 100)/survival control–100. NS = nonsignificant difference from control. * TCM = traditional Chinese medicine: composed by the plants Rhizoma coptidis, Radix scutellariae, Cortex phellodendri, Fructus gardeniae jasminoidis, Fructus forsythiae, and Flos lonicerae japonicae. (a) = Gavage in infected fish twice a day for 10 days. (b) = Injected in the same day of infection with the bacteria.

3.2. In Vivo Studies

All in vivo studies were related to survival against L. garvieae infection, and, in most cases, the extractives of medicinal herbs and plants were added to the diets for various periods before the treated fish being challenged with L. garvieae infection. Overall, the essential oils that showed the best in vitro antibacterial activity against L. garvieae (Table 1) were not tested for the in vivo bioassays yet. The extractives tested under in vivo conditions presented moderate in vitro antibacterial activity against this bacterium or even were not tested in vitro. However, the dietary supplementation with all tested extractives reduced mortality of infected animals (Table 2), probably because they improved immune parameters before challenging the treated fish with L. L. garvieaegarvieae. A 12-day feeding giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) with hot-water extract of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) leaves at 1, 2, and 3 g kg−1 diet induced significantly higher survival rate after challenge with L. garvieae infection, but higher disease resistance was seen in the prawn treated with higher concentration of the extract [108][30]. In addition, the treated animals exhibited an enhancement in the immune responses including respiratory burst, phenoloxidase activity, superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione peroxidase, total hemocyte value, differential hemocyte count, transglutaminase activity, and phagocytic activity towards L. garvtieae. In the subsequent research work by Chang and Cheng [109][31], dietary addition of three tested water hyacinth extracts (Table 2) for 120 days increased survival and immune parameters, i.e., total hemocyte count, semi-granular and granular cells counts of giant freshwater prawn while phenoloxidase activity, respiratory bursts of hemocytes were not observed only with dietary addition of powder of this plant to the diet.

4. Conclusions

Disease outbreaks by Lactococcus species specially L. garvieae is one of the major concerns faced in the aquaculture production worldwide, and various biological and environmental variables, as well as the aquaculture practices and husbandry can affect the quantity and impacts of the morbidity and mortality. Data influencing the economic losses can, thus, assist to develop policies and strategies to reduce the losses by lactococcosis outbreaks in aquaculture industry. Lactococcosis outbreaks especially by L. garvieae are increasingly recognized as a significant and re-emerging bacterial disease in aquaculture, but there is no an estimation of its economic impacts. Data describing antagonistic activity and disease resistance efficacy of potential medicinal herbs and plants towards lactococcosis caused by L. garvieae, L. lactis, L. piscium and L. raffinolactis in finfish are not very much. Almost all in vitro studies with vegetable and lichens extractives were performed against L. garvieae. Despite no strong antibacterial activity by herb extracts against L. garvieae, essential oils especially those that contain thymol and carvacrol are more effective against L. garvieae strains. The exhibited differences on minimum inhibitory and bactericidal values for the same extractive in different studies could be due to the use of different bacterial strains or parts or chemotypes of the same plant. Despite best anti-L. garvieae activity by the essential oils under in vitro assays, the in vivo bioassays need be assessed yet. The extractives tested under in vivo conditions presented moderate antibacterial activity against this bacterium or even were not tested in vitro. However, the dietary supplementation with all tested extractives reduced mortality of infected animals, probably because they improved immune parameters before challenging the treated fish with L. garvieae.
Disease outbreaks by Lactococcus species specially L. garvieae is one of the major concerns faced in the aquaculture production worldwide, and various biological and environmental variables, as well as the aquaculture practices and husbandry can affect the quantity and impacts of the morbidity and mortality. Data influencing the economic losses can, thus, assist to develop policies and strategies to reduce the losses by lactococcosis outbreaks in aquaculture industry. Lactococcosis outbreaks especially by L. garvieae are increasingly recognized as a significant and re-emerging bacterial disease in aquaculture, but there is no an estimation of its economic impacts. Data describing antagonistic activity and disease resistance efficacy of potential medicinal herbs and plants towards lactococcosis caused by L. garvieae, L. lactis, L. piscium and L. raffinolactis in finfish are not very much. Almost all in vitro studies with vegetable and lichens extractives were performed against L. garvieae. Despite no strong antibacterial activity by herb extracts against L. garvieae, essential oils especially those that contain thymol and carvacrol are more effective against L. garvieae strains. The exhibited differences on minimum inhibitory and bactericidal values for the same extractive in different studies could be due to the use of different bacterial strains or parts or chemotypes of the same plant. Despite best anti-L. garvieae activity by the essential oils under in vitro assays, the in vivo bioassays need be assessed yet. The extractives tested under in vivo conditions presented moderate antibacterial activity against this bacterium or even were not tested in vitro. However, the dietary supplementation with all tested extractives reduced mortality of infected animals, probably because they improved immune parameters before challenging the treated fish with L. garvieae.

References

  1. Soltani, M.; Nikbakht, G.; Ebrahimzadeh Moussavi, H.; Ahmadzadeh, N. Epizootic outbreak of lactococcosis caused by Lactococcus garvieae in farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Iran. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 2008, 28, 95–106.
  2. Eldar, A.A.; Ghittino, C. Lactococcus garvieae and Streptococcus iniae infections in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: Similar, but different diseases. Dis. Aquat. Org. 1999, 36, 227–231.
  3. Chen, M.-H.; Hung, S.-W.; Shyu, C.-L.; Lin, C.-C.; Liu, P.-C.; Chang, C.-H.; Shia, W.-Y.; Cheng, C.-F.; Lin, S.-L.; Tu, C.-Y. Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis infection in Bester sturgeon, a cultured hybrid of Huso huso × Acipenser ruthenus, in Taiwan. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 93, 581–588.
  4. Austin, B.; Austin, D.A.; Austin, B.; Austin, D.A. Bacterial Fish Pathogens; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 481.
  5. Ortega, C.; Irgang, R.; Valladares-Carranza, B.; Collarte, C.; Avendaño-Herrera, R. First identification and characterization of Lactococcus garvieae isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) cultured in mexico. Animals 2020, 10, 1609.
  6. Hirono, I.; Yamashita, H.; Park, C.I.; Yoshida, T.; Aoki, T. Identification of genes in a KG—Phenotype of Lactococcus garvieae, a fish pathogenic bacterium, whose proteins react with antiKG—Rabbit serum. Microb. Pathog. 1999, 27, 407–417.
  7. Bragg, R.; Broere, J. Streptococcosis in rainbow trout in South Africa. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 1986, 6, 89–91.
  8. Bekker, A.; Hugo, C.; Albertyn, J.; Boucher, C.; Bragg, R. Pathogenic Gram-positive cocci in South African rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Dis. 2011, 34, 483–487.
  9. Vendrell, D.; Balcázar, J.L.; Ruiz-Zarzuela, I.; De Blas, I.; Gironés, O.; Múzquiz, J.L. Lactococcus garvieae in fish: A review. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006, 29, 177–198.
  10. Chang, P.; Lin, C.; Lee, Y. Lactococcus garvieae infection of cultured rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss in Taiwan and associated biophysical characteristics and histopathology. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 2002, 22, 319–327.
  11. Avci, H.; Birincioglu, S.; Tanrikul, T.; Epikmen, E.; Metin, N.; Avsever, M. Experimental Lactococcus garvieae infection in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum 1792: A comparative histopathological and immunohistochemical study. J. Fish Dis. 2014, 37, 481–495.
  12. Chen, S.-C.; Lin, Y.-D.; Liaw, L.-L.; Wang, P.-C. Lactococcus garvieae infection in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobranchium rosenbergii confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and 16S rDNA sequencing. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2001, 45, 45–52.
  13. Algöet, M.; Bayley, A.; Roberts, E.; Feist, S.; Wheeler, R.; Verner-Jeffreys, D. Susceptibility of selected freshwater fish species to a UK Lactococcus garvieae isolate. J. Fish Dis. 2009, 32, 825–834.
  14. Türe, M.; Haliloğlu, H.İ.; Altuntaş, C.; Boran, H.; Kutlu, İ. Comparison of experimental susceptibility of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), turbot (Psetta maxima), black sea trout (Salmo trutta labrax) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) to Lactococcus garvieae. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2014, 14, 507–513.
  15. Kusuda, R.; Hamaguchi, M. Extracellular and intracellular toxins of Streptococcus sp. isolated from yellowtail. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 1988, 8, 9–10.
  16. Aguado-Urda, M.; López-Campos, G.H.; Gibello, A.; Cutuli, M.T.; López-Alonso, V.; Fernández-Garayzábal, J.F.; Blanco, M.M. Genome sequence of Lactococcus garvieae 8831, isolated from rainbow trout lactococcosis outbreaks in Spain. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 4263–4264.
  17. Holbourn, K.P.; Shone, C.C.; Acharya, K. A family of killer toxins. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 4579–4593.
  18. Ture, M.; Altinok, I. Detection of putative virulence genes of Lactococcus garvieae. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2016, 119, 59–66.
  19. Meyburgh, C.; Bragg, R.; Boucher, C. Lactococcus garvieae: An emerging bacterial pathogen of fish. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2017, 123, 67–79.
  20. Saraoui, T.; Leroi, F.; Björkroth, J.; Pilet, M.-F. Lactococcus piscium: A psychrotrophic lactic acid bacterium with bioprotective or spoilage activity in food—A review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 907–918.
  21. Rodrigues, M.; Lima, S.; Higgins, C.; Canniatti-Brazaca, S.; Bicalho, R. The Lactococcus genus as a potential emerging mastitis pathogen group: A report on an outbreak investigation. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 9864–9874.
  22. Mannion, P.; Rothburn, M. Diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis caused by Streptococcus lactis and assisted by immunoblotting of serum antibodies. J. Infect. 1990, 21, 317–318.
  23. Clark, I.; Burnie, J. Immunoblotting and culture positive endocarditis. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 44, 152–156.
  24. Campbell, P.; Dealler, S.; Lawton, J. Septic arthritis and unpasteurised milk. J. Clin. Pathol. 1993, 46, 1057–1058.
  25. Durand, J.M.; Rousseau, M.C.; Gandois, J.M.; Kaplanski, G.; Mallet, M.N.; Soubeyrand, J. Streptococcus lactis septicemia in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 1995, 50, 64–65.
  26. Zechini, B.; Cipriani, P.; Papadopoulou, S.; Di Nucci, G.; Petrucca, A.; Teggi, A. Endocarditis caused by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis in a patient with atrial myxoma: A case report. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006, 56, 325–328.
  27. Wang, P.-C.; Lin, Y.-D.; Liaw, L.-L.; Chern, R.-S.; Chen, S.-C. Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis also causes white muscle disease in farmed giant freshwater prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2008, 79, 9–17.
  28. Khoo, L.H.; Austin, F.W.; Quiniou, S.M.; Gaunt, P.S.; Riecke, D.K.; Jacobs, A.M.; Meals, K.O.; Dunn, A.W.; Griffin, M.J. Lactococcosis in silver carp. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2014, 26, 1–8.
  29. Wünnemann, H.; Eskens, U.; Prenger-Berninghoff, E.; Ewers, C.; Lierz, M. Lactococcus lactis, causative agent of an endocarditis valvularis and parietalis thromboticans in the allis shad, Alosa alosa (L.). J. Fish Dis. 2018, 41, 1207–1215.
  30. Chang, C.-C.; Tan, H.-C.; Cheng, W. Effects of dietary administration of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) extracts on the immune responses and disease resistance of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 92–100.
  31. Chang, C.C.; Cheng, W. Multiple dietary administrating strategies of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on enhancing the immune responses and disease resistance of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquac. Res. 2016, 47, 140–152.
More