Biotechnological Importance of Torulaspora delbrueckii: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Peter Tang and Version 4 by Ricardo Franco-Duarte.

Torulaspora delbrueckii has attracted interest in recent years, especially due to its biotechnological potential, arising from its flavor- and aroma-enhancing properties when used in wine, beer or bread dough fermentation, as well as from its remarkable resistance to osmotic and freezing stresses.

 

 

  • Torulaspora delbrueckii
  • non-Saccharomyces
  • wine
  • bread
  • biotechnology
  • genomics

1. Introduction

Non-Saccharomyces yeasts were described for many years as sources of spoilage and contamination, and are also associated with a negative contribution to the organoleptic profile of wines. However, in recent decades, wines produced by some non-Saccharomyces yeasts revealed distinct and unique characteristics attracting the attention of many research groups [1]. Improved wines are obtained benefiting from their physiological and metabolic features, which have a positive effect on the wine’s sensorial and chemical properties, namely in terms of sugar and acid consumption, alongside an enhanced aroma complexity through the release of important metabolites [2][3][4]. Within this group of yeasts, Torulaspora delbrueckii stands out as one of the most advantageous non-Saccharomyces species due to its potential to introduce diversity and multiplicity to the standard wine’s market, currently established by the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [5]. The rising interest in T. delbrueckii is reflected by the number of scientific publications involving this species. According to the Web of Science™ database, between the years 1987 and 2013, an average of eight publications per year were related to the topic T. delbrueckii (search queries by title, abstracts and keywords), and this number is continuously growing with a 6-fold increase between 2013 and 2021.

2. Occurrence and General Characteristics

Yeasts from the genus Torulaspora have been reported in a wide variety of habitats, such as fruits [6], insects [7][8], soils [9], soil invertebrates [10], plants [11][12], seawater [13], spoiled food [6] and malt environments [6], where yeast from other genera like Saccharomyces and Zygosaccharomyces may also be present [14][15]. Although not considered a human pathogen, the species T. delbrueckii can also be found as a clinical isolate [16]. In addition to the diversified isolation substrates, T. delbrueckii also presents a worldwide geographical distribution, with reports describing its isolation in 37 countries from the five continents, as shown in Figure 1
Jof 07 00712 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of Torulaspora delbrueckii. Countries in which T. delbrueckii isolation was reported are highlighted in blue. Data were collected from Albertin et al. [6], Drumonde-Neves et al. [1] and de Vuyst et al. [17].
Species belonging to the genus Torulaspora can reproduce asexually by cell division (budding division) or sexually through asci, containing one to four spherical ascospores, characteristic of ascomycetous yeasts [4][18][19]. Regarding its shape, Torulaspora yeasts are mainly discerned by spherical cells (hence the torulu terminology), but also ovoid and ellipsoidal forms, with dimensions of approximately 2–6×3–7 µm, which are smaller than those of S. cerevisiae. The sharing of multiple morphological and physiological characteristics between some species has led to a misclassification of some of them. Within the genus Torulaspora, four strains presumed to be T. delbrueckii were later reclassified into the genera Debaryomyces and Saccharomyces. Currently, this group includes at least six species: T. delbrueckii (anamorph Candida colliculosa), T. franciscae, T. pretoriensis, T. microellipsoides, T. globosa and T. maleeae [20]. Two other species — T. indica and T. quercuum — have also been proposed to be included in this genus, after the employment of molecular tools to discriminate them [21]. For many years, T. delbrueckii was described as a haploid yeast, essentially because of its small cell size and due to the rare detection of tetrads in sporulation media [20]. However, Albertin et al. [6] suggested that this species may be mainly diploid. The reduced size of this yeast is not, in this way, associated with the ploidy level, and may be explained by the fact that T. delbrueckii only possesses 16 chromosomes in the diploid phase, instead of the 32 chromosomes found in S. cerevisiae diploid yeasts [20]. Given the lack of deep knowledge about the life cycle of T. delbrueckii, it is still difficult to design strategies for the biotechnological improvement of T. delbrueckii using classical genetic techniques such as those commonly proposed for S. cerevisiae [22]. New techniques are, in this way, being explored, as will be detailed further.
The phylogenetic proximity between T. delbrueckii and S. cerevisiae may contribute to explain why T. delbrueckii is one of the non-Saccharomyces yeasts suggested to be most promising for use in biotechnological industries, especially the ones using fermentative processes such as wine- or bread making. T. delbrueckii was one of the first non-Saccharomyces species to be applied commercially in wines, even though only a few species are available in companies’ catalogues: PreludeTM, BiodivaTM, Zymaflore® Alpha, Vinifer NSTD, and Primaflora® VB BIO [4].

3. Genomics and Taxonomy

In opposition to the extensive knowledge about S. cerevisiae genome, the most thoroughly annotated eukaryotic organism [23], there has been a hinder in progress regarding T. delbrueckii genomic characterization, also delaying the understanding of the genomics underlying the unique aptitudes showed by this species, in comparison with other yeasts. The genome of T. delbrueckii type strain CBS1146 is organized in eight chromosomes, it is 9.52 Mb long and has a GC content of 41.9% [24]. Recently, our in-depth study [25] analysed publicly available genomes of T. delbrueckii strains, improving their annotation and concluding about important intra-strain differences. In terms of genome size, variations between 9.22 Mb and 11.53 Mb were found. This variation corresponds also to a diverse number of protein-coding genes being annotated (between 464 and 503). Interestingly, the similarity obtained when analysing pairwise comparisons between the four tested strains’ genomes was only as high as 99.63%, and in one case was as low as 97.62%. The improved genome annotation obtained in this work allowed to extend this diversity to a particular functional characterization, showing inter-strain differences in proteins related to ATP-synthesis, proton transports, biosynthesis of inositol and resistance to antiviral Brefeldin A. These differences highlight the importance of using different yeast strains in beverages production (and also in other biotechnological applications), improving their quality and diversity.
T. delbrueckii belongs to the phylum Ascomycota, subphylum Saccharomycotina, class Saccharomycetes, order Saccharomycetales, family Saccharomycetaceae. In our previous work [25] we detailed the T. delbrueckii phylogenetic placement in relation to 386 other fungal species/strains, concluding about the proximity between this species and the genera Zygosaccharomyces and Zygotorulaspora. Our results were in accordance with the work of Shen et al. [26], which showed the phylogenetic reconstruction of more than 300 budding yeasts, even though the T. delbrueckii branch was concluded as not being robustly supported. Aiming at elucidating the proximity between the three genera — TorulasporaTorulaspora, Zygosaccharomyces and Zygotorulaspora — we performed a robust phylogenetic reconstruction, filling this gap with the inclusion of additional genomes publicly available in NCBI. As can be depicted in Figure 2, all the 15 available genomes of T. delbrueckii were grouped together in a single isolated clade (highlighted in green in Figure 2), separated from the ones of T. pretoriensis, T. franciscae, T. maleae, T. globosa and T. microellipsoides. The large branch containing all genomes of the genus Torulaspora revealed to be isolated from Zygotorulaspora clade (containing species Zygotorulaspora florentina and Zygotorulaspora mrakii, and highlighted in red in Figure 2). In addition, both these genera — Torulaspora and Zygotorulaspora—formed an isolated group, separated from the one containing Zygosaccharomyces species (highlighted in blue in Figure 2).
Jof 07 00712 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic placement of Torulaspora delbrueckii, showing the relationship of 15 strains with publicly available genomes, in relation to its closely related species, chosen from [25]. The phylogenetic reconstruction was obtained using the following parameters: maximum likelihood in IQ-TREE (http://www.iqtree.org, accessed on 28 July 2021), the model of amino acid evolution JTT (Jones–Taylor–Thornton), and four gamma-distributed rates. Homologues were detected for 3820 proteins across the proteome of the 55 fungal species/strains, collected from NCBI. The set of 3820 proteins was aligned and then concatenated for their use in the phylogenetic analysis. These proteins offer a clear high-resolution evolutionary view of the different species, as they are essential proteins beyond the specific biology of the different yeasts. Bootstrapping provided values of 100% for most nodes.

4. Metabolism

Concerning T. delbrueckii fermentative behaviour, no consensus has yet been gathered regarding its fermentative power. Some authors characterized this species as having a good fermentation performance in wines [3][4][14][20]. Bely et al. [14] even categorized T. delbrueckii as having a performance 9 to 10% higher when considering other non-Saccharomyces yeasts. On the contrary, Belda et al. [27] and Loira et al. [28] concluded that Torulaspora spp. have lower fermentative power. Still, Almeida and Pais [29] described similar fermentation ability for T. delbrueckii and S. cerevisiae strains in bread dough. These observations could support the idea of a strain dependent profile with respect to the fermentative capacity of this species, which is also supported by our unpublished data showing a heterogenous performance when analyzing a collection of T. delbrueckii strains.
T. delbrueckii presents poor fructose and glucose consumption under conditions of high ethanol and moderate acetic acid concentrations, that can be present in stuck wine fermentations, although it can survive in this environment. This behavior has been associated with the sensitivity of its hexose transport to the inhibitory effect of ethanol [30][31]. To address this limitation, a hybrid strain (F1-11) was constructed by Santos et al. [31] combining the advantageous characteristics of high tolerance to both ethanol and acetic acid of T. delbrueckii, and the high hexose consumption of S. cerevisiae. This hybrid exhibited a hexose consumption comparable to the one of the S. cerevisiae and revealed improved resistance to ethanol and acetic acid, presenting lower cell death rates.
Comparatively, both T. delbrueckii and S. cerevisiae species behave quite particularly regarding oxygen availability. As the oxygen feed rate decreases, S. cerevisiae is the first yeast to switch to a respiro-fermentative metabolism, thus exhibiting lower biomass yields at reduced amounts of oxygen, in comparison to T. delbrueckii, which is able to maintain full respiration under these conditions, translating into a lower fermentation strength and a slower growth rate [32]. This occurrence could be less favorable in a winemaking environment since wine production is usually performed under strictly anaerobic conditions (e.g., white, and sparkling wine), or in the presence of very low oxygen concentrations (e.g., red wines) [33].
Even though T. delbrueckii possesses lower tolerance to low-oxygen conditions [14][34], its metabolism is usually associated with several positive characteristics, mainly regarding the wine industry, related to high osmotic and sulphur dioxide resistance [23][24][25][26][27][28][35], enhanced capacity for biotransformation of terpenes [28][36][37], or high competence to produce lactic and succinic acids [28][36]. Table 1 reviews experimental results obtained regarding the most relevant fermentation parameters towards wines’ organoleptic profile, comparing T. delbrueckii and S. cerevisiae.
Table 1. Comparison between Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae concerning fermentation parameters quantified at the end of fermentation process with relevance in wine organoleptic profiles.

Product

Torulaspora delbrueckii

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Notes

References

Acetic acid

0.27–0.56 g/L

1.0–1.17 g/L

Key signature in volatile acidity of wines

[14][20]

Malic acid

Cheese

Consumption between 10.5–25%

  

Cheese

Whether degradation or

production is desirable depends on the must characteristics.

[

Varied aromatic properties

23

Unable to inhibit pathogenic bacteria; low β-glucosidase activity

][38][39]

[

71

]

[72]

Citric acid

Honey

2.18–2.36 g/L

Honey sugar

2.23 g/L

Rapidly ferment sugar

Citrus-like taste

[40]

Large-scale productions only in combination with

S. cerevisiae

[7]

Succinic acid

0.84–1.11 g/L

Maximum of 0.65 g/L

Minor acid in the overall wine acidity, although the combination with one

molecule of ethanol creates the ester mono-ethyl succinate, responsible for a mild, fruity aroma

[41]

-

Maximum of 1.13 g/L

[42]

Mannoproteins

T. delbrueckii produces 25% more than S. cerevisiae

Released during fermentation or ageing processes

[23]

Polysaccharides

T. delbrueckii releases 50% more than S. cerevisiae

Increases the quality of mouthfeel properties

[43]

Glycerol

1–10.5 g/L

Maximum of 9.1 g/L

Smoothness and viscosity features

[44][45]

Ethanol

40.6–72.68 g/L

103–121 g/L

  

[39][46]

5. Biotechnological Importance of T. delbrueckii

5.1. Bread Industry

Bread making is a practice that has long been discovered and has been the subject of much progress. In more recent years, developments in bread making have been increasingly focused on the enhancement and diversification of the sensory pleasures of taste, texture, and appearance of the final product [19]. The degradation of the dough carbohydrates (namely fructose, glucose, sucrose and maltose) present in the flour, or even wittingly added, is carried out by yeasts, resulting in the release of carbon dioxide and ethanol, produced through glycolysis and posterior pyruvate decarboxylation and reduction [17][19][30]. Carbon dioxide is responsible for the dough leavening, while most of the ethanol evaporates during the baking process. However, the latter also plays an important role in the properties of the dough [17]. The choice of the appropriate yeast is usually based on (i) good fermentative power which could be translated into its ability to leaven the dough; (ii) capacity to use different carbon sources; and (iii) tolerance to stressful conditions, namely, osmotic, and freezing stresses [30][47][48]. S. cerevisiae strains have been domesticated and optimized for baking applications and are usually the manufacturer’s required yeast for the baking industry. This species efficiently uses maltose as a source of energy, as opposed to Candida humilis and Kazachstania exigua which, according to de Vuyst et al. [17], are sourdough-specific maltose-negative yeasts. S. cerevisiae is commonly implemented as a leavening agent, becoming an alternative to sourdough (extensively used for years) particularly in rapid and industrial-scale bread productions [17]. However, T. delbrueckii is being pointed out as an alternative to S. cerevisiae in this industry, mainly due to its high osmotic and freeze-thawing resistance, showing improvement of the quality of the bakery products [29][30]. Experiments conducted by Almeida and Pais [29] demonstrated greater leavening activity in lean and frozen dough for T. delbrueckii strains, comparing to S. cerevisiae, as the traditional yeast was more prone to suffer from freeze damage during the storage of the doughs. Apart from this feature, T. delbrueckii strains displayed rapid growth, a more rapid response when exposed to hyperosmotic conditions, and high biomass production accompanied with sweet properties (associated with the release of aromatic compounds). These observations were later confirmed by Hernandez-Lopez, Prieto and Randez-Gil [49]. Due to its osmotolerant properties, T. delbrueckii has already been used in the bakery industry in Japan, for the production of sweet breads and pastries [50].
Co-cultures using S. cerevisiae and T. delbrueckii species enhanced bread quality with superior aroma and improved sensorial attributes, with 47 volatile compounds—predominately alcohols, aldehydes, and esters—being identified in the bread crumb leavened with both yeasts [19]. Wahyono et al. [19] highlighted some properties of the resulting mixed bread which, using a radar plot, rated within a range of 4.73–5.57 from a total of 7 points, such as acceptability, enhanced flavor, mouthfeel, and color, in comparison with S. cerevisiae single cultures, which recorded within 4.07–5.71 range in the same radar plot.

5.2. Production of Fermented Beverages

In recent years, researchers worldwide have been paying particular attention to T. delbrueckii exploitation to improve wines organoleptic final profile and quality. As referred above, its physiological and metabolic properties revealed positive effects in wines characteristics towards acids and sugar consumption, but also an enhancement of the aroma complexity through the production of important metabolites [2][3][4][23][51][52][53][54]. During wine fermentation, higher alcohols (also termed fused alcohols) and esters contribute 30 to 80% to the aroma profiles of wine, being the two most relevant groups of metabolites [54]. Isobutanol, phenyl ethanol and isoamyl alcohol are the main fusel alcohols reported to contribute to the wine’s scent in concentrations ranging from 1.41 mg/L to 9.2 mg/L [55]. According to Ebeler [56], yields of this type of metabolites can achieve 140–420 mg/L, but concentrations over 300 mg/L contribute negatively to the aroma quality. Besides fusel alcohols, the aromatic matrix of wine is composed of esters, which are by-products of yeasts metabolism during malolactic fermentation, ageing and, most relevant in this context, alcoholic fermentation. These molecules reach maximum values when yeasts achieve the stationary growth phase [57], as its production by T. delbrueckii is a strain-dependent feature [55]. Two main esters classes are present in wine: the ethyl esters and the acetate esters. The contribution of the latter encompasses desirable floral and fruity sensory properties in wine, contributing about 75% to the flavor profile [55][56][57]. However, as stated in Belda et al. [57], wines holding concentrations of ethyl acetate higher than 90 mg/L are considered to be faulty. Other important metabolites are fatty acids, which are detected in alcoholic beverages as mainly straight-chain and saturated molecules, with palmitoleic acid considered the most relevant unsaturated fatty acid. Besides these, fatty acids with different chain lengths are part of the wine’s matrix but prevail in small amounts, which makes them not so significant as the previous ones [56]. The main fermented beverages in which T. delbrueckii is employed are reviewed in Table 2.
Table 2. Torulaspora delbrueckii’s applications in fermented beverages.
, modifications on the analytical profile of the chocolate are obtained. Moreover, differences in the samples obtained from S. cerevisiae and T. delbrueckii inoculated chocolate had a significant impact on the consumers’ perception of the final product, mentioned by some as fruitier. Therefore, the use of this unconventional yeast resulted in a positive contribution to the development of the chocolate’s final aroma. In addition, T. delbrueckii can also be explored in the cheese industry, benefiting from its tolerance to low temperatures, low pH, high salt concentrations and low water activity [70]. Andrade et al. [71] produced cheese from fermented milk, with the aim of evaluating the impact of T. delbrueckii (in mixed or pure inocula) on cheese production, detecting a slow consumption of lactose which can be translated into a reduced β-galactosidase activity, as stated by the authors.  
Table 3. T. delbrueckii industrial food applications.

Food Applications

Used Substrate

Advantages

Disadvantages

References

Chocolate

Cocoa beans

Good flavor quality of cocoa and, therefore, the chocolate

Expedite in mixed fermentations with S. cerevisiae

[69]

Olive oil

Black olives

Easy hydrolyzation of olive oil

Growth inhibition at concentrations higher than 0.5% (w/v) of oleuropein

[73]

Coffee

Coffee cherries

Improve coffee’s sensorial quality

Pronounced astringency depending on the coffee variety

[74][75]

Bio-protection

–

Reduction in the use of chemical preservatives to control food spoilage

–

[76][77]

Beverages Applications

Used Substrate

Advantages

Disadvantages

References

Beer

Wort

High tolerance to hop compounds; good flavor-forming properties

Low sugar utilization

[35][58][59][60]

Mezcal

Agave juice †

Rich in volatile compounds; acceptable in sensory tests

Low performance

[61][62][63]

Tequila

Agave juice *

Positive influence on the final sensory profile

–

[64]

Cider

Apple juice †

Great production of ethyl decanoate and ethyl hexanoate

Low performance; negligible amounts of acetate esters

[65][66]

Mead

Honey sugar

Good fermentation ability; Good sensory features

Grassy flavor

[7]

Soy alcoholic beverage

Soy whey

Enrich aroma profiles: high levels of ethyl decanoate and ethyl hexanoate; metabolize hexanal;

–

[67]

* Specifically from Agave tequilana; † sterile.

 

5.3. Other Food Applications

The reported versatility of T. delbrueckii makes it a remarkable asset to be explored, not only for bread and fermented beverages purposes, but also in other diverse food products (Table 3). One example is the production of chocolate in which yeasts play a key role in flavour development, as the quality of chocolate is reduced if the cocoa fermentation process is conducted without these microorganisms [68]. This importance is reinforced by Visitin et al. [69] by showing the involvement of T. delbrueckii in the fermentation of cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao [68]) to produce chocolate, despite not yet being standard in this industry. Authors showed that through a combination with S. cerevisiae

References

  1. Drumonde-Neves, J.; Fernandes, T.; Lima, T.; Pais, C.; Franco-Duarte, R. Learning from 80 years of studies: A comprehensive catalogue of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with viticulture and winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res. 2021, 21, foab017.
  2. Kosel, J.; Čadež, N.; Schuller, D.; Carreto, L.; Franco-Duarte, R.; Raspor, P. The influence of Dekkera bruxellensis on the transcriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on the aromatic profile of synthetic wine must. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, 1–11.
  3. Azzolini, M.; Tosi, E.; Lorenzini, M.; Finato, F.; Zapparoli, G. Contribution to the aroma of white wines by controlled Torulaspora delbrueckii cultures in association with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 277–293.
  4. Benito, S. The impact of Torulaspora delbrueckii yeast in winemaking. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 3081–3094.
  5. Benito, Á.; Calderón, F.; Benito, S. The influence of non-Saccharomyces species on wine fermentation quality parameters. Fermentation 2019, 5, 54.
  6. Albertin, W.; Chasseriaud, L.; Comte, G.; Panfili, A.; Delcamp, A.; Salin, F.; Marullo, P.; Bely, M. Winemaking and bioprocesses strongly shaped the genetic diversity of the ubiquitous yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94246.
  7. Barry, J.P.; Metz, M.S.; Hughey, J.; Quirk, A.; Bochman, M.L. Two Novel Strains of Torulaspora delbrueckii isolated from the honey bee microbiome and their use in honey fermentation. Fermentation 2018, 4, 22.
  8. Nguyen, N.H.; Suh, S.O.; Blackwell, M. Five novel Candida species in insect-associated yeast clades isolated from Neuroptera and other insects. Mycologia 2007, 99, 842–858.
  9. Capriotti, A. Torulaspora nilssoni nov. spec. Arch. Für Mikrobiol. 1957, 28, 247–254.
  10. Byzov, B.A.; Thanh, V.N.; Babjeva, I.P. Yeasts associated with soil invertebrates. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1993, 16, 183–187.
  11. Limtong, S.; Koowadjanakul, N. Yeasts from phylloplane and their capability to produce indole-3-acetic acid. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 3323–3335.
  12. Yurkov, A.M.; Chernov, I.Y. Geographical races of certain species of ascomycetous yeasts in the Moscow and Novosibirsk regions. Microbiology 2005, 74, 597–601.
  13. Silva-Bedoya, L.M.; Ramirez-Castrillon, M.; Osorio-Cadavid, E. Yeast diversity associated to sediments and water from two Colombian artificial lakes. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 135–142.
  14. Bely, M.; Stoeckle, P.; Masneuf-Pomarède, I.; Dubourdieu, D. Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii–Saccharomyces cerevisiae on high-sugar fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 312–320.
  15. Renault, P.; Coulon, J.; de Revel, G.; Barbe, J.C.; Bely, M. Increase of fruity aroma during mixed T. delbrueckii/S. cerevisiae wine fermentation is linked to specific esters enhancement. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 207, 40–48.
  16. Kaygusuz, I.; Mulazimoglu, L.; Cerikcioglu, N.; Toprak, A.; Oktay, A.; Korten, V. An unusual native tricuspid valve endocarditis caused by Candida colliculosa. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, 319–322.
  17. De Vuyst, L.; Harth, H.; Van Kerrebroeck, S.; Leroy, F. Yeast diversity of sourdoughs and associated metabolic properties and functionalities. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 239, 26–34.
  18. Hendriks, L.; Goris, A.; Van De Peer, Y.; Neefs, J.M.; Vancanneyt, M.; Kersters, K.; Berny, J.F.; Hennebert, G.L.; De Wachter, R. Phylogenetic Relationships among Ascomycetes and Ascomycete-like Yeasts as Deduced from Small Ribosomal Subunit RNA Sequences. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 15, 98–104.
  19. Wahyono, A.; Lee, S.B.; Kang, W.W.; Park, H.D. Improving bread quality using co-cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Torulaspora delbrueckii JK08, and Pichia anomalia JK04. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2016, 28, 298–313.
  20. Ramírez, M.; Velázquez, R. The yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii: An interesting but difficult-to-use tool for winemaking. Fermentation 2018, 4, 94.
  21. Saluja, P.; Yelchuri, R.K.; Sohal, S.K.; Bhagat, G.; Prasad, G.S. Torulasporaindica a novel yeast species isolated from coal mine soils. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 101, 733–742.
  22. Ramírez, M.; Ambrona, J. Construction of sterile ime1Δ-transgenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts unable to disseminate in nature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2129–2134.
  23. Cherry, J.M.; Hong, E.L.; Amundsen, C.; Balakrishnan, R.; Binkley, G.; Chan, E.T.; Christie, K.R.; Costanzo, M.C.; Dwight, S.S.; Engel, S.R.; et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database: The genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D700–D705.
  24. Gordon, J.L.; Armisen, D.; Proux-We´ra, E.; ÓhEígeartaigh, S.S.; Byrne, K.P.; Wolfe, K.H. Evolutionary Erosion of Yeast Sex Chromosomes by Mating-Type Switching Accidents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20024–20029.
  25. Santiago, C.; Rito, T.; Vieira, D.; Fernandes, T.; Pais, C.; Sousa, M.J.; Soares, P.; Franco-Duarte, R. Improvement of Torulaspora delbrueckii genome annotation: Towards the exploitation of genomic features of a biotechnologically relevant yeast. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 287.
  26. Shen, X.X.; Opulente, D.A.; Kominek, J.; Zhou, X.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Buh, K.V.; Haase, M.A.; Wisecaver, J.H.; Wang, M.; Doering, D.T.; et al. Tempo and mode of genome evolution in the budding yeast subphylum. Cell 2018, 175, 1533–1545.
  27. Belda, I.; Navascués, E.; Marquina, D.; Santos, A.; Calderon, F.; Benito, S. Dynamic analysis of physiological properties of Torulaspora delbrueckii in wine fermentations and its incidence on wine quality. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1911–1922.
  28. Loira, I.; Vejarano, R.; Bañuelos, M.A.; Morata, A.; Tesfaye, W.; Uthurry, C.; Villa, A.; Cintora, I.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Influence of sequential fermentation with Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on wine quality. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 915–922.
  29. Almeida, M.J.; Pais, C. Leavening ability and freeze tolerance of yeasts isolated from traditional corn and rye bread doughs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 4401–4404.
  30. Pacheco, A.; Santos, J.; Chaves, S.; Almeida, J.; Leão, C.; Sousa, M.J. The Emerging Role of the Yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii in Bread and Wine Production: Using Genetic Manipulation to Study Molecular Basis of Physiological Responses. Struct. Funct. Food Eng. 2012, 339–370.
  31. Santos, J.; Sousa, M.J.; Cardoso, H.; Inacio, J.; Silva, S.; Spencer-Martins, I.; Leão, C. Ethanol tolerance of sugar transport, and the rectification of stuck wine fermentations. Microbiology 2008, 154, 422–430.
  32. Alves-Araújo, C.; Pacheco, A.; Almeida, M.J.; Spencer-Martins, I.; Leão, C.; Sousa, M.J. Sugar utilization patterns and respiro-fermentative metabolism in the baker’s yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii. Microbiology 2007, 153, 898–904.
  33. Velázquez, R.; Zamora, E.; Álvarez, M.L.; Ramírez, M. Using Torulaspora delbrueckii killer yeasts in the elaboration of base wine and traditional sparkling wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 289, 134–144.
  34. Holm Hansen, E.; Nissen, P.; Sommer, P.; Nielsen, J.C.; Arneborg, N. The effect of oxygen on the survival of non-Saccharomyces yeasts during mixed culture fermentations of grape juice with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 541–547.
  35. Ciani, M.; Picciotti, G. The growth kinetics and fermentation behaviour of some non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with winemaking. Biotechnol. Lett. 1995, 17, 1247–1250.
  36. Ciani, M.; Maccarelli, F. Oenological properties of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with winemaking. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 14, 199–203.
  37. King, A.; Dickinson, J.R. Biotransformation of monoterpene alcohols by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Torulaspora delbrueckii and Kluyveromyces lactis. Yeast 2000, 16, 499–506.
  38. Chen, K.; Escott, C.; Loira, I.; Del Fresno, J.M.; Morata, A.; Tesfaye, W.; Calderon, F.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A.; Han, S.; Benito, S. Use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and oenological tannin in red winemaking: Influence on colour, aroma and sensorial properties of young wines. Food Microbiol. 2018, 69, 51–63.
  39. Mecca, D.; Benito, S.; Beisert, B.; Brezina, S.; Fritsch, S.; Semmler, H.; Rauhut, D. Influence of nutrient supplementation on Torulaspora delbrueckii wine fermentation aroma. Fermentation 2020, 6, 35.
  40. Liu, S.; Laaksonen, O.; Kortesniemi, M.; Kalpio, M.; Yang, B. Chemical composition of bilberry wine fermented with non-Saccharomyces yeasts (Torulaspora delbrueckii and Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in pure, sequential and mixed fermentations. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 262–274.
  41. Puertas, B.; Jiménez, M.J.; Cantos-Villar, E.; Cantorial, J.M.; Rodríguez, M.E. Use of Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in semi-industrial sequential inoculation to improve quality of Palomino and Chardonnay wines in warm climates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 122, 733–746.
  42. Franco-Duarte, R.; Bessa, D.; Gonçalves, F.; Martins, R.; Silva-Ferreira, A.C.; Schuller, D.; Sampaio, P.; Pais, C. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates with focus in succinic acid production. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, 1–12.
  43. Domizio, P.; Liu, Y.; Bisson, L.F.; Barile, D. Use of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts as novel sources of mannoproteins in wine. Food Microbiol. 2014, 43, 5–15.
  44. Escribano, R.; González-Arenzana, L.; Portu, J.; Garijo, P.; López-Alfaro, I.; López, R.; Santamaria, P.; Gutiérrez, A.R. Wine aromatic compound production and fermentative behaviour within different non-Saccharomyces species and clones. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 1521–1531.
  45. Ivit, N.N.; Longo, R.; Kemp, B. The Effect of Non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces Non-cerevisiae Yeasts on Ethanol and Glycerol Levels in Wine. Fermentation 2020, 6, 77.
  46. Franco-Duarte, R.; Umek, L.; Mendes, I.; Castro, C.C.; Fonseca, N.; Martins, R.; Silva-Ferreira, A.C.; Sampaio, P.; Pais, C.; Schuller, D. New integrative computational approaches unveil the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheno-metabolomic fermentative profile and allow strain selection for winemaking. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 509–520.
  47. Alves-Araújo, C.; Almeida, M.J.; Sousa, M.J.; Leão, C. Freeze tolerance of the yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii: Cellular and biochemical basis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 240, 7–14.
  48. Li, Z.; Li, H.; Bian, K. Microbiological characterization of traditional dough fermentation starter (Jiaozi) for steamed bread making by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 234, 9–14.
  49. Hernandez-Lopez, M.J.; Prieto, J.A.; Randez-Gil, F. Osmotolerance and leavening ability in sweet and frozen sweet dough. Comparative analysis between Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker’s yeast strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2003, 84, 125–134.
  50. Spencer, J.F.T.; Spencer, D.M. Taxonomy: The names of the yeasts. In Yeasts in Natural and Artificial Habitats; Springer: Berlin/ Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 11–32.
  51. Renault, P.; Miot-Sertier, C.; Marullo, P.; Hernández-Orte, P.; Lagarrigue, L.; Lonvaud-Funel, A.; Bely, M. Genetic characterization and phenotypic variability in Torulaspora delbrueckii species: Potential applications in the wine industry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 134, 201–210.
  52. Lu, Y.; Chua, J.Y.; Voon, M.K.W.; Huang, D.; Lee, P.R.; Liu, S.Q. Effects of Different Inoculation Regimes of Torulaspora delbrueckii and Oenococcus oeni on Fermentation Kinetics and Chemical Constituents of Durian Wine. South Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2017, 38, 273–285.
  53. Romano, P.; Ciani, M.; Fleet, G.H. Yeasts in the Production of Wine; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 81–115.
  54. Wei, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Dai, L.; Yue, T. Characteristic fruit wine production via reciprocal selection of juice and non-Saccharomyces species. Food Microbiol. 2019, 79, 66–74.
  55. Ebeler, S.E. Analytical Chemistry: Unlocking the Secrets of Wine Flavor. Food Rev. Int. 2001, 17, 45–64.
  56. Lambrechts, M.G.; Pretorius, I.S. Yeast and its Importance to Wine Aroma—A Review. South Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2000, 21, 97–129.
  57. Belda, I.; Ruiz, J.; Esteban-Fernández, A.; Navascués, E.; Marquina, D.; Santos, A.; Moreno-Arribas, M. Microbial contribution to wine aroma and its intended use for wine quality improvement. Molecules 2017, 22, 189.
  58. Michel, M.; Kopecká, J.; Meier-Dörnberg, T.; Zarnkow, M.; Jacob, F.; Hutzler, M. Screening for new brewing yeasts in the non- Saccharomyces sector with Torulaspora delbrueckii as model. Yeast 2016, 33, 129–144.
  59. King, A.J.; Dickinson, J.R. Biotransformation of hop aroma terpenoids by ale and lager yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 3, 53–62.
  60. Canonico, L.; Agarbati, A.; Comitini, F.; Ciani, M. Torulaspora delbrueckii in the brewing process: A new approach to enhance bioflavour and to reduce ethanol content. Food Microbiol. 2016, 56, 45–51.
  61. Gibson, B.; Dahabieh, M.; Krogerus, K.; Jouhten, P.; Magalhães, F.; Pereira, R.; Siewers, V.; Vidgren, V. Adaptive laboratory evolution of ale and lager yeasts for improved brewing efficiency and beer quality. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 23–44.
  62. Arrizon, J.; Morel, S.; Gschaedler, A.; Monsan, P. Fructanase and fructosyltransferase activity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts isolated from fermenting musts of Mezcal. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 560–565.
  63. la Torre-González, D.; Javier, F.; Narváez-Zapata, J.A.; Taillandier, P.; Larralde-Corona, C.P. Mezcal as a novel source of mixed yeasts inocula for wine fermentation. Processes 2020, 8, 1296.
  64. Lachance, M.A. Yeast communities in a natural tequila fermentation. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1995, 68, 151–160.
  65. Wei, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T. Characterization and screening of non-Saccharomyces yeasts used to produce fragrant cider. LWT 2019, 107, 191–198.
  66. Lorenzini, M.; Simonato, B.; Slaghenaufi, D.; Ugliano, M.; Zapparoli, G. Assessment of yeasts for apple juice fermentation and production of cider volatile compounds. LWT 2019, 99, 1–18.
  67. Chua, J.Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, S.Q. Evaluation of five commercial non-Saccharomyces yeasts in fermentation of soy (tofu) whey into an alcoholic beverage. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 533–542.
  68. Ho, V.T.T.; Zhao, J.; Fleet, G. Yeasts are essential for cocoa bean fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 174, 72–87.
  69. Visintin, S.; Ramos, L.; Batista, N.; Dolci, P.; Schwan, F.; Cocolin, L. Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii starter cultures on cocoa beans fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 257, 31–40.
  70. Blaisonneau, J.; Sor, F.; Cheret, G.; Yarrow, D.; Fukuhara, H. A Circular Plasmid from the Yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii. Plasmid 1997, 38, 202–209.
  71. Andrade, R.P.; Oliveira, D.R.; Lopes, A.C.A.; de Abreu, L.R.; Duarte, W.F. Survival of Kluyveromyces lactis and Torulaspora delbrueckii to simulated gastrointestinal conditions and their use as single and mixed inoculum for cheese production. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 1–12.
  72. Ferreira, A.D.; Viljoen, B.C. Yeasts as adjunct starters in matured Cheddar cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 86, 131–140.
  73. Psani, M.; Kotzekidou, P. Technological characteristics of yeast strains and their potential as starter adjuncts in Greek-style black olive fermentation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 1329–1336.
  74. da Mota, M.C.B.; Batista, N.N.; Rabelo, M.H.S.; Ribeiro, D.E.; Borém, F.M.; Schwan, R.F. Influence of fermentation conditions on the sensorial quality of coffee inoculated with yeast. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109482.
  75. Bressani, A.P.P.; Martinez, S.J.; Sarmento, A.B.I.; Borém, F.M.; Schwan, R.F. Influence of yeast inoculation on the quality of fermented coffee (Coffea arabica var. Mundo Novo) processed by natural and pulped natural processes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 343, 109107.
  76. Simonin, S.; Alexandre, H.; Nikolantonaki, M.; Coelho, C.; Tourdot-Maréchal, R. Inoculation of Torulaspora delbrueckii as a bio-protection agent in winemaking. Food Res. Int. 2018, 107, 451–461.
  77. Al-Qaysi, S.A.S.; Abdullah, N.M.; Jaffer, M.R.; Abbas, Z.A. Biological Control of Phytopathogenic Fungi by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Torulaspora delbrueckii Isolated from Iraqi Date Vinegar. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 300–311.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback