Hybrid Renewable Energy System: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Mohamed A. Ahmed.

The HRES is a cyber–physical system that can be divided into two layers: the power infrastructure and the communication infrastructure layers, as shown in Figure 1. The power infrastructure layer consists of different energy sources (e.g., wind turbines, photovoltaics, diesel generators, and batteries), transformers, feeders, converters, and electrical connections. The communication infrastructure layer supports the physical infrastructure by an underlying communication network, linking between sensors and actuators nodes. This enables the local control center to manage the system operation. In this integration, ICTs play an essential role in allowing the transition from the conventional power grid to the future smart grid by supporting the integration of HRES.

  • communication architecture
  • smart campus
  • hybrid energy system

1. Introduce

Renewable energy sources, such as photovoltaics and wind energy, are receiving significant attention to increase the penetration rate of renewable energy sources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, due to their energy potential and the maturity of these technologies [12]. These sources are alternatives for conventional energy sources that supply power for self-consumers and remote communities. Different energy configurations could be configured to enable systems operation in both a grid-connected mode as well as a standalone mode. As renewable energy sources are intermittent in nature, it becomes challenging to integrate a significant number of renewable energy sources with the power grid. Communication infrastructure is the crucial element and the main building block for future smart grids, which enables the integration of DERs and bidirectional energy and information flow in the power distribution system. 

Renewable energy sources, such as photovoltaics and wind energy, are receiving significant attention to increase the penetration rate of renewable energy sources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, due to their energy potential and the maturity of these technologies [1]. These sources are alternatives for conventional energy sources that supply power for self-consumers and remote communities. Different energy configurations could be configured to enable systems operation in both a grid-connected mode as well as a standalone mode. As renewable energy sources are intermittent in nature, it becomes challenging to integrate a significant number of renewable energy sources with the power grid. Communication infrastructure is the crucial element and the main building block for future smart grids, which enables the integration of DERs and bidirectional energy and information flow in the power distribution system. 

Figure 1

 shows a schematic diagram for the grid integration of HRES. In this integration, HRES will provide many services for electric power utilities during peak demand by supporting different services such as demand response and demand-side management. The underlying communication network will play an essential role in enabling the integration of DERs with improved resilience, reliability, and efficiency.

Figure 1.

 Schematic diagram for grid integration of HRES. P&C: Protection and Control.

The HRES is a cyber–physical system that can be divided into two layers: the power infrastructure and the communication infrastructure layers, as shown in 

Figure 1

. The power infrastructure layer consists of different energy sources (e.g., wind turbines, photovoltaics, diesel generators, and batteries), transformers, feeders, converters, and electrical connections. The communication infrastructure layer supports the physical infrastructure by an underlying communication network, linking between sensors and actuators nodes. This enables the local control center to manage the system operation. In this integration, ICTs play an essential role in allowing the transition from the conventional power grid to the future smart grid by supporting the integration of HRES.

Many researchers and studies have investigated hybrid renewable energy systems, and from different perspectives, such as energy management systems [13], demand response [14], economic cost [15], carbon dioxide emissions and environmental impact [16], optimizing source size [17,18], communication network [19,20], IoT-enabled smart grid [21,22,23], HRES optimization [24,25], modeling based on international standards [26,27,28,29], optimal location [30], and capacity planning [31]. The author in [13] provided an overview of energy management agent (EMA) framework architectures’ ability to manage the energy generation/consumption of DERs/HRES in homes, buildings, and communities. The proposed framework consists of four layers: an infrastructure, a control, a service, and an application layers. The infrastructure layer covers different smart grid domains, including generation, transmission, distribution, and consumption. The control layer is realized through a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system, programmable logic control (PLC), substation control, and home/building automation system. The work highlighted the need for a standardized EMA data model and communication protocols.

Many researchers and studies have investigated hybrid renewable energy systems, and from different perspectives, such as energy management systems [2], demand response [3], economic cost [4], carbon dioxide emissions and environmental impact [5], optimizing source size [6][7], communication network [8][9], IoT-enabled smart grid [10][11][12], HRES optimization [13][14], modeling based on international standards [15][16][17][18], optimal location [19], and capacity planning [20]. The author in [2] provided an overview of energy management agent (EMA) framework architectures’ ability to manage the energy generation/consumption of DERs/HRES in homes, buildings, and communities. The proposed framework consists of four layers: an infrastructure, a control, a service, and an application layers. The infrastructure layer covers different smart grid domains, including generation, transmission, distribution, and consumption. The control layer is realized through a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system, programmable logic control (PLC), substation control, and home/building automation system. The work highlighted the need for a standardized EMA data model and communication protocols.

2. IoT-Based Architecture for Hybrid Renewable Energy System

In HRES, communication infrastructures are crucial elements that are responsible for data exchange among data resources (sensors and meters), controllers, and the control center. In order to support remote monitoring and control operation, the information flow from different entities defines the system architecture [19]. The IoT technology will provide great opportunities for sensing, communication, processing, and actuating to support various microgrid applications. First, measured data are acquired and transmitted to the local control center using a communication network. Then, decisions are made with this data, and control commands are sent through the communication network where the control commands are run using controllable devices. Two main types of communication schemes could be considered: centralized schemes and distributed schemes. In the centralized scheme, all data are transmitted to a central control center where data are processed and control commands are transmitted to controllable entities. In the distributed scheme, all data are received and processed using the local controller. In order to control the entire system, local control centers need to share information with each other through the communication network.

In HRES, communication infrastructures are crucial elements that are responsible for data exchange among data resources (sensors and meters), controllers, and the control center. In order to support remote monitoring and control operation, the information flow from different entities defines the system architecture [8]. The IoT technology will provide great opportunities for sensing, communication, processing, and actuating to support various microgrid applications. First, measured data are acquired and transmitted to the local control center using a communication network. Then, decisions are made with this data, and control commands are sent through the communication network where the control commands are run using controllable devices. Two main types of communication schemes could be considered: centralized schemes and distributed schemes. In the centralized scheme, all data are transmitted to a central control center where data are processed and control commands are transmitted to controllable entities. In the distributed scheme, all data are received and processed using the local controller. In order to control the entire system, local control centers need to share information with each other through the communication network.

This work focuses on the communication level between the local controller of HRES and the microgrid control center, where the status of different renewable energy sources and loads can be collected and communicated to a central controller that determines an appropriate action in the system. 

Figure 2 shows the IoT-based architecture for HRES which consists of four main layers: the power layer, the data acquisition layer, the communication network layer, and the application layer [20,21,22,23].

 shows the IoT-based architecture for HRES which consists of four main layers: the power layer, the data acquisition layer, the communication network layer, and the application layer [9][10][11][12].

Figure 2.

 IoT-based architecture for smart hybrid energy system.

2.1. Power Layer

The power layer covers residential power generation and consumption. Examples of power consumption are residential homes/buildings that include different applications such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), lighting, electric vehicles, and various appliances. Residential energy generation consists of various renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, conventional sources, such as diesel generators, and energy storage systems, such as batteries. Other elements that are part of the power layer are transformers, buses, and loads. Loads could be classified into three main types: residential, commercial, and industrial. In addition, various sensor nodes, measuring devices, and actuators are attached to the power system layer.

2.2. Data Acquisition Layer

The data acquisition layer includes different types of sensor nodes and measurement devices connected to different subsystems of HRES. Data collected utilizing various sensor nodes and measurement devices is transmitted to the application layer through the communication network layer. Based on the data from different energy sources such as wind energy, photovoltaic system, diesel generator, and battery storage, HRES can be operated in island mode or grid-connected mode.

2.3. Communication Network Layer

The communication network layer is responsible for receiving the data from sensor nodes and measuring devices in the power layer and sending it to the control center. This can be done through various network services, including home area network (HAN), building area network (BAN), neighborhood area network (NAN), and wide area network (WAN). Based on the type of communication technology, the communication network can be divided into wired-based solutions (PLC, Ethernet, optical fibers, etc.) and wireless-based solutions (Wi-Fi, ZigBee, WiMAX, LoRa, Cellular, etc.). The communication network layer enables data collection and transmission from each system component using intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) and remote terminal units (RTUs). The data is stored in the control center for different services such as human-machine interfaces (HMI), application servers, historians, databases, and web servers.

2.4. Application Layer

The main function of the application layer is real-time monitoring and control. All monitoring data and status information are received, stored, and processed for different services at the local control center. The control center incorporates a local area network (LAN) which enables communication with different protection and control devices such as IEDs and RTUs. Examples of smart home/building applications are energy consumption management, environmental control, and HVAC management. Other applications for power service providers are DER management, demand response, and EMS. The control center coordinates the system operation by receiving and analyzing the monitoring data received from the communication network layer.

References

  1. Zia, M.F.; Benbouzid, M.; Elbouchikhi, E.; Muyeen, S.M.; Techato, K.; Guerrero, J.M. Microgrid Transactive Energy: Review, Architectures, Distributed Ledger Technologies, and Market Analysis. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 19410–19432.
  2. Choi, J.S. Energy Management Agent Frameworks: Scalable, Flexible, and Efficient Architectures for 5G Vertical Industries. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2021, 15, 62–73.
  3. Eltamaly, A.M.; Alotaibi, M.A.; Alolah, A.I.; Ahmed, M.A. A Novel Demand Response Strategy for Sizing of Hybrid Energy System With Smart Grid Concepts. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 20277–20294.
  4. Tazay, A.F.; Samy, M.M.; Barakat, S. A Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of an Autonomous Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources for University Building at Saudi Arabia. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2020, 15, 2519–2527.
  5. Kermani, M.; Carnì, D.L.; Rotondo, S.; Paolillo, A.; Manzo, F.; Martirano, L. A Nearly Zero-Energy Microgrid Testbed Laboratory: Centralized Control Strategy Based on SCADA System. Energies 2020, 13, 2106.
  6. Abidi, M.G.; Ben Smida, M.; Khalgui, M.; Li, Z.; Qu, T. Source Resizing and Improved Power Distribution for High Available Island Microgrid: A Case Study on a Tunisian Petroleum Platform. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 22856–22871.
  7. Sawle, Y.; Jain, S.; Babu, S.; Nair, A.R.; Khan, B. Prefeasibility Economic and Sensitivity Assessment of Hybrid Renewable Energy System. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 28260–28271.
  8. Shahraeini, M.; Javidi, H.; Ghazizadeh, M.S. Comparison Between Communication Infrastructures of Centralized and Decentralized Wide Area Measurement Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2010, 2, 206–211.
  9. Stefanov, A.; Liu, C.-C. ICT modeling for integrated simulation of cyber-physical power systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), Berlin, Germany, 14–17 October 2012.
  10. Abir, S.M.A.A.; Anwar, A.; Choi, J.; Kayes, A.S.M. IoT-enabled Smart Energy Grid: Applications and Challenges. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 50961–50981.
  11. Shakerighadi, B.; Anvari-Moghaddam, A.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. Internet of Things for Modern Energy Systems: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Open Issues. Energies 2018, 11, 1252.
  12. Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Guerrero, J.M.; Vasquez, J.C.; Palacios-Garcia, E.J.; Li, J. Convergence and Interoperability for the Energy Internet: From Ubiquitous Connection to Distributed Automation. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2020, 14, 91–105.
  13. Bhandari, B.; Lee, K.-T.; Lee, G.-Y.; Cho, Y.-M.; Ahn, S.-H. Optimization of hybrid renewable energy power systems: A review. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 2, 99–112.
  14. Etamaly, A.M.; Mohamed, M.A.; Alolah, A. A smart technique for optimization and simulation of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/diesel/battery energy systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE), Oshawa, ON, Canada, 17–19 August 2015; pp. 1–6.
  15. Ali, I.; Hussain, S. Communication Design for Energy Management Automation in Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2016, 9, 1.
  16. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). International Standard IEC 61400-25-2: Communications for Monitoring and Control of Wind Power Plants—Information Models, 1st ed.; International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  17. Ahmed, M.A.; Eltamaly, A.M.; Alotaibi, M.A.; Alolah, A.I.; Kim, Y.-C. Wireless Network Architecture for Cyber Physical Wind Energy System. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 40180–40197.
  18. Eltamaly, A.M.; Ahmed, M.A.; Alotaibi, M.A.; Alolah, A.I.; Kim, Y.-C. Performance of Communication Network for Monitoring Utility Scale Photovoltaic Power Plants. Energies 2020, 13, 5527.
  19. Yu, X.; Li, W.; Maleki, A.; Rosen, M.A.; Birjandi, A.K.; Tang, L. Selection of optimal location and design of a stand-alone photovoltaic scheme using a modified hybrid methodology. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 2021, 45, 101071.
  20. Zhang, W.; Maleki, A.; Pourfayaz, F.; Shadloo, M.S. An artificial intelligence approach to optimization of an off-grid hybrid wind/hydrogen system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 12725–12738.
More