Dynamics of Methane: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jessie Wu and Version 1 by Chih-Yu Chiu.

Mangrove forests sequester a significant amount of organic matter in their sediment and are recognized as an important carbon storage source (i.e., blue carbon, including in seagrass ecosystems and other coastal wetlands). The methane-producing archaea in anaerobic sediments releases methane, a greenhouse gas species. The contribution to total greenhouse gas emissions from mangrove ecosystems remains controversial. However, the intensity CH4 emissions from anaerobic mangrove sediment is known to be sensitive to environmental changes, and the sediment is exposed to oxygen by methanotrophic (CH4-oxidizing) bacteria as well as to anthropogenic impacts and climate change in mangrove forests. This review discusses the major factors decreasing the effect of mangroves on CH4 emissions from sediment, the significance of ecosystem protection regarding forest biomass and the hydrosphere/soil environment, and how to evaluate emission status geospatially. An innovative “digital-twin” system overcoming the difficulty of field observation is required for suggesting sustainable mitigation in mangrove ecosystems, such as a locally/regionally/globally heterogenous environment with various random factors.

  • geospatial
  • greenhouse gas
  • carbon storage

1. Introduction

The carbon (C) sequestered in the biomass and deep sediment of vegetated coastal ecosystems, including mangroves, seagrass beds, and tidal marshes, has been called “blue carbon” [1,2][1][2]. Although vegetated coastal habitats cover a relatively small area (<2%) of the coastal ocean, they have C burial rates that are 40 times higher than tropical rainforests and account for more than half of the C burial in marine sediment [3].
Although the global area of vegetated ecosystems is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that of terrestrial forests, the contribution of vegetated coastal habitats per unit area to long-term C sequestration is much greater, which is in part because of their efficiency in trapping suspended matter and associated organic C during tidal inundation [1]. Among vegetated ecosystems, mangroves have been well highlighted as among the major sources of organic matter in tropical areas because they occupy a large part of the tropical coastal area [4]. Additionally, organic C production is more rapid in these areas than for other estuarine and marine primary producers [3,5][3][5].
Mangrove forests have gained attention because of their high C productivity [6,7][6][7] and because they are among the most C-rich ecosystems in the world [8,9][8][9]. The total net primary production of mangroves is approximately 200 Tg C year−1 [10[10][11],11], but most of this C is lost or recycled via CO2 flux to the atmosphere (34.1 Tg C year−1, ~20%) or is exported as particulate organic C, dissolved organic C, and dissolved inorganic C to the ocean (117.9 Tg C year−1; ~60%) [11,12][11][12]. Of the remaining C, burial accounts for 18.4 to 34.4 Tg C year−1 [1,9,10,13,14][1][9][10][13][14], and this blue C is considered to represent a significant long-term storage of atmospheric CO2 [13,15][13][15]. The global C sequestration rate in mangrove wetlands is 174 g C m−2 year−1, on average, corresponding to about 10% to 15% of global coastal ocean C [9]. Organic-rich soils dominate in mangrove C storage, accounting for 49% to 98% of C stocks in mangrove wetlands [8,16][8][16].
Global mangroves are mainly distributed along tropical and subtropical coastlines, covering 137,760 km2. The world’s largest mangrove areas are in low latitudinal regions, such as Indonesia (22.6% of the global total), Australia (7.1%), and Brazil (7.0%) [17]. The world’s best developed mangrove forests can be found in the Sundarbans, the Mekong Delta, the Amazon, Madagascar, and Southeast Asia [17]. Furthermore, Indonesia has the highest mangrove species diversity (48 species [15]) and exceptionally high C stocks in mangrove sediment [15]. Because the economic/population growth in those area is also substantial, the loss of mangrove forest due to anthropogenic impacts is substantial globally [15,18,19][15][18][19]. Loss rates vary greatly between countries, ranging from 1% to 20% of the total mangrove forest area, so predicting global mangrove forest changes in the future is difficult [20]. Loss of mangroves by clearing, conversion to industrial estates/aquaculture, and changes in drainage patterns lead to striking changes in soil chemistry and usually result in rapid emission rates of greenhouse gases [21,22,23][21][22][23].

2. Methane Flux from Mangrove Forests

2.1. Significance of Methane Emission from Mangrove Forests

The magnitude of CH4 flux in mangrove forests and its relative contribution to global warming compared to CO2 flux remains controversial. The global scale practice of the mangrove C budget has shown that CH4 emissions from soil are 2 Tg C year−1 [9]. Considering its global warming potential, the contribution of CH4 emissions is comparable to the above-mentioned rate of C burial (18–34 Tg C year−1) and C emission by soil respiration (34 Tg C year−1) [1,9,10,13,14][1][9][10][13][14]. Recent studies have reported a significant amount of CH4 flux from mangrove sediment [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and have claimed that the contribution of CH4 flux to global warming was non-negligible in estuarine mangrove forests, which could account for 18% to 22% of blue C burial rates [13] and 9% to 33% of plant CO2 sequestration [50][32]. However, observed CH4 flux from mangrove soils is mostly negligible compared to CO2 emissions from sediment but is highly variable [38,39[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44],40,41,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58], particularly for non-polluted mangrove sediment [21,49,59,60,61,62][21][31][45][46][47][48]. To confirm this observation, the authors compared incubation experiments with mangrove sediment collected from the Vietnamese Mekong delta and the Indian Sundarbans forest [39][34]. CH4 production was equivalent to only 0.05 to 0.27% of the CO2 production under aerobic incubation or 0.05 to 0.22% under anaerobic incubation conditions, even when considering the potential difference caused by (n = 30 in each incubation experiments).

2.2. Factors Associated with Methane Emission

2.2.1. Soil Conditions

Low CH4 production and emission in mangrove sediment compared to in interior wetland soils is mainly due to the high presence of sulphate in mangrove sediment, which allows sulphate-reducing bacteria to outcompete CH4-producing archea (i.e., methanogens) [40,55,56,57][35][41][42][43]. However, soil salinity and sulphate concentration show a low negative relationship with methane-producing activities, which suggests that both forms of methanogenesis are not completely inhibited by sulphate reducers with increasing sulphate concentrations [55][41]. A significant increase in CH4 production activity caused by the dilution of seawater was also reported [39][34]. Therefore, mangrove sediment CH4 production activity is highly and non-linearly sensitive to its specific soil pH/electrical conductivity by being affected by different freshwater intrusion intensities. Despite few studies on the impact of freshwater intrusion on CH4 emission, it is still important to evaluate because rice paddies/agricultural fields are often found adjacent to protected mangrove zones (Figure 1). Regardless of a significant correlation between salinity/sulphate concentration in sediment and CH4 emissions [39,55,63][34][41][49] CH4 production activity can be significantly increased by the dilution of seawater concentration [39][34].
Forests 12 01204 g001 550
Figure 1. Reforestation zone in Sundarbans mangrove area in India (a), protected mangrove forest adjacent to rice paddies (b), and vegetable-growing field adjacent to mangrove forests (c) in Soc Trang, Vietnam.
Another reason for decreased CH4 production is that compared to herbaceous organic matter, woody organic matter derived from mangrove trees is relatively recalcitrant to methanogens using it as a substrate [58][44]. Additionally, mangrove ecosystems are inundated by irregular periodic tides affected by the tidally mediated exchange of porewater between sediment and surface water via the ebb and flow of tides [10,59,60][10][45][46]. The tidally mediated exchange of porewater between sediment and surface water occurs via the ebb and flow of tides (i.e., tidal pumping [64,65,66,67][50][51][52][53]). Tidal pumping is a potential source of solutes to mangrove water and causes ebullition, but the process has only recently been quantified and directly linked to the export of C and nutrients [67,68][53][54]. In addition to the spatio-temporal heterogeneity caused by irregular tidal pumping, CH4 flux is spatio-temporally heterogeneous and is highly variable because of the heterogenic spatial distribution of aerial mangrove tree roots [69][55] and burrows created by crabs/goby fish. Such activity enhances hydraulic connectivity and increases the surface area of the sediment–water interface [70][56] where the exchange of the by-products of subterranean respiration can occur during tidal inundation [71,72,73,74,75,76][57][58][59][60][61][62]. Owing to the difficulty of observing CH4 flux precisely, CH4 data for mangrove forests are limited compared to data observing interior wetlands and underestimate the global emission [13,60][13][46].

2.2.2. Methanogenic and Methanotrophic Communities

Although CH4 flux micrometeorological observation data are limited [76][62], recent studies on the community structures of methanogens and methanotrophs have revealed the biological processes common to interior wetlands and as unique characteristics in coastal wetlands. Previous studies on CH4 metabolism have indicated that CH4 emission in natural ecosystems is largely driven by microorganisms, especially methanogens and methanotrophs [34,77,78,79,80][63][64][65][66][67]. Highly diverse methanogenic and methanotrophic communities can promote CH4 production and oxidation [81,82][68][69]. However, different types of methanogens and methanotrophs have preferable growing conditions, which further affect CH4 emissions in natural ecosystems [77,83,84][64][70][71]. Methanogens include hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic, and methylotrophic methanogens [84,85][71][72]. Methanotrophs exist under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Aerobic methanotrophs are phylogenetically divided into two main groups: type I (Gammaproteobacteria, e.g., Methylococcaceae) and type II (Alphaproteobacteria, e.g., Methylocystaceae) [86,87[73][74][75][76],88,89], nitrate- or nitrite-dependent [90,91][77][78] and metal-dependent [92][79] CH4 oxidizers, respectively. Type I methanotrophs tend to be dominant in natural environments with sufficient nutrients and substrates (i.e., relatively high O2 concentration, low CH4 concentration) [39[34][44][80],58,93], whereas type II methanotrophs tend to be abundant in resource-limited environments with a high affinity for their nutrients and substrates (i.e., relatively low O2 concentration, high CH4 concentration) [84,87,94,95][71][74][81][82]. Of note, methanogens and methanotrophs in coastal wetland soils have unique characteristics that are rarely found in interior wetland soils. Hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens are considered dominant in natural freshwater wetland soils. However, methylotrophic methanogens are dominant in hypersaline and sulphate-rich environments including coastal wetlands, and they make different contributions to CH4 production [82,96,97][69][83][84]. In coastal wetlands, anaerobic methanotrophs include sulphate-dependent methanotrophs [39,98][34][85], which might have an important role in controlling low coastal CH4 fluxes. Furthermore, several reports have described the possibility of active CH4 production under aerobic conditions in mangrove forests based on laboratory incubation experiments and field observations [39,99][34][86].

References

  1. McLeod, E.; Chmura, G.L.; Bouillon, S.; Salm, R.; Björk, M.; Duarte, C.M.; Lovelock, C.E.; Schlesinger, W.H.; Silliman, B.R. A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 552–660.
  2. Pendleton, L.; Donato, D.C.; Murray, B.C.; Crooks, S.; Jenkins, W.A.; Sifleet, S.; Craft, C.; Fourqurean, J.W.; Kauffman, J.B.; Marba, N.; et al. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43542.
  3. Duarte, C.M.; Middelburg, J.J.; Caraco, N. Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeoscience 2005, 2, 1–8.
  4. Robertson, A.I.; Alongi, D.M.; Boto, K.G. Food chains and carbon fluxes, in tropical mangrove ecosystems. Coast. Estuar. Stud. 1992, 41, 293–326.
  5. Nedwell, D.B.; Blackbum, T.H.; Wiebe, W.J. Dynamic nature of the turnover of organic carbon, nitrogen and sulphur in the sediments of a Jamaican mangrove forest. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1994, 110, 203–212.
  6. Eong, O.J. Mangroves-a carbon source and sink. Chemosphere 1993, 27, 1097–1107.
  7. Odum, W.E.; Heald, E.J. The Detritus-Based Food Web of an Estuarine Mangrove Community; Estuarine Research; Cronin, L.E., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1975; pp. 265–286.
  8. Donato, D.C.; Kauffman, J.B.; Murdiyarso, D.; Kurnianto, S.; Stidham, M.; Kanninen, M. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 293–297.
  9. Alongi, D.M. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 195–219.
  10. Bouillon, S.; Borges, A.V.; Castañeda-Moya, E.; Diele, K.; Dittmar, T.; Duke, N.C.; Kristensen, E.; Lee, S.Y.; Marchand, C.; Middelburg, J.J.; et al. Mangrove production and carbon sinks: A revision of global budget estimates. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2008, 22.
  11. Alongi, D.M.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K. Contribution of mangroves to coastal carbon cycling in low latitude seas. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 213, 266–272.
  12. Rosentreter, J.A.; Maher, D.T.; Erler, D.V.; Murray, R.; Eyre, B.D. Seasonal and temporal CO2 dynamics in three tropical mangrove creeks—A revision of global mangrove CO2 emissions. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 222, 729–745.
  13. Rosentreter, J.A.; Maher, D.T.; Erler, D.V.; Murray, R.H.; Eyre, B.D. Methane emissions partially offset “blue carbon” burial in mangroves. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaao4985.
  14. Breithaupt, J.L.; Smoak, J.M.; Smith III, T.J.; Sanders, C.J.; Hoare, A. Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: Strengthening the global budget. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2012, 26.
  15. Murdiyarso, D.; Purbopuspito, J.; Boone Kauffman, J.; Warren, M.W.; Sasmito, S.D.; Donato, D.C.; Manuri, S.; Krisnawati, H.; Taberima, S.; Kurnianto, S. The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 1089–1092.
  16. Benson, L.; Glass, L.; Jones, T.; Ravaoarinorotsihoarana, L.; Rakotomahazo, C. Mangrove Carbon Stocks and Ecosystem Cover Dynamics in Southwest Madagascar and the Implications for Local Management. Forests 2017, 8, 190.
  17. Giri, C.; Ochieng, E.; Tieszen, L.L.; Zhu, Z.; Singh, A.; Loveland, T. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20, 154–159.
  18. Valiela, I.; Bowen, J.L.; York, J.K. Mangrove forests: One of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience 2001, 51, 807.
  19. Duke, N.C.; Kovacs, J.M.; Griffiths, A.D.; Preece, L.; Hill, D.J.E.; van Oosterzee, P.; Mackenzie, J.; Morning, H.S.; Burrows, D. Large-scale dieback of mangroves in Australia’s Gulf of Carpentaria: A severe ecosystem response, coincidental with an unusually extreme weather event. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2017, 68, 1816–1829.
  20. Alongi, D.M. Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29, 331–349.
  21. Giani, L.; Bashan, Y.; Holguin, G.; Strangmann, A. Characteristics and methanogenesis of Balandra lagoon mangrove soils, Baja Californina Sur Mexico. Geoderma 1996, 72, 149–160.
  22. Holguin, G.; Vazquez, P.; Bashan, Y. The role of sediment microorganisms in the productivity, conservation, and rehabilitation of mangrove ecosystems: An overview. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2001, 33, 265–278.
  23. Alongi, D.M. Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests. Carbon Manag. 2012, 3, 313–322.
  24. Chen, G.C.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Ye, Y. Summer fluxes of atmospheric greenhouse gases N2O, CH4 and CO2 from mangrove soil in South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 2761–2767.
  25. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Biswas, H.; De, T.; Sen, B.; Sen, S.; Jana, T. Impact of Sundarban mangrove biosphere on the carbon dioxide and methane mixing ratios at the NE Coast of Bay of Bengal, India. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 629–638.
  26. Allen, D.E.; Dalal, R.C.; Rennenberg, H.; Meyer, R.L.; Reeves, S.; Schmidt, S. Spatial and temporal variation of nitrous oxide and methane flux between subtropical mangrove sediments and the atmosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 622–631.
  27. Andreote, F.D.; Jiménez, D.J.; Chaves, D.; Dias, A.C.F.; Luvizotto, D.M.; Dini-Andreote, F.; Fasanella, C.C.; Lopez, M.V.; Baena, S.; Gouvea, R.; et al. The microbiome of Brazilian mangrove sediments as revealed by metagenomics. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38600.
  28. Allen, D.; Dalal, R.C.; Rennenberg, H.; Schmidt, S. Seasonal variation in nitrous oxide and methane emissions from subtropical estuary and coastal mangrove sediments, Australia. Plant. Biol. 2011, 13, 126–133.
  29. Purvaja, R.; Ramesh, R. Human impacts on methane emission from mangrove ecosystems in India. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2000, 1, 86–97.
  30. Purvaja, R.; Ramesh, R. Natural and anthropogenic methane emission from coastal wetlands of South India. Environ. Manag. 2001, 27, 547–557.
  31. Purvaja, R.; Ramesh, R.; Frenzel, P. Plant-mediated methane emission from an Indian mangrove. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 1825–1834.
  32. Chen, G.; Chen, B.; Yu, D.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Ye, Y.; Chen, S. Soil greenhouse gas emissions reduce the contribution of mangrove plants to the atmospheric cooling effect. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 124019.
  33. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambrige, UK, 2014.
  34. Arai, H.; Yoshioka, R.; Hanazawa, S.; Minh, V.Q.; Tuan, V.Q.; Tinh, T.K.; Phu, T.Q.; Jha, C.S.; Rodda, S.R.; Dadhwal, V.K.; et al. Function of the methanogenic community in mangrove soils as influenced by the chemical properties of the hydrosphere. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 2016, 62, 150–163.
  35. Zheng, X.; Guo, J.; Song, W.; Feng, J.; Lin, G. Methane emission from mangrove wetland soils is marginal but can be stimulated significantly by anthropogenic activities. Forests 2018, 9, 738.
  36. He, Y.; Guan, W.; Xue, D.; Liu, L.; Peng, C.; Liao, B.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Comparison of methane emissions among invasive and native mangrove species in Dongzhaigang, Hainan Island. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 697, 133945.
  37. Livesley, S.J.; Andrusiak, S.M. Temperate mangrove and salt marsh sediments are a small methane and nitrous oxide source but important carbon store. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 97, 19–27.
  38. Alongi, D.M.; Pfitzner, J.; Trott, L.A.; Tirendi, F.; Dixon, P.; Klumpp, D.W. Rapid sediment accumulation and microbial mineralization in forests of the mangrove Kandelia candel in the Jiulongjiang Estuary, China. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2005, 63, 605–618.
  39. Bai, Z.; Yang, G.; Chen, H.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, Z.; Zhou, G.; Peng, C. Nitrous oxide fluxes from three forest types of the tropical mountain rainforests on Hainan Island, China. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 92, 469–477.
  40. Strangmann, A.; Bashan, Y.; Giani, L. Methane in pristine and impaired mangrove soils and its possible effect on establishment of mangrove seedlings. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2008, 44, 511–519.
  41. Biswas, H.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K.; Sen, S.; Jana, T.K. Spatial and temporal patterns of methane dynamics in the tropical mangrove dominated estuary, NE coast of Bay of Bengal, India. J. Mar. Syst. 2007, 68, 55–64.
  42. Segarra, K.E.A.; Comerford, C.; Slaughter, J.; Joye, S.B. Impact of electron acceptor availability on the anaerobic oxidation of methane in coastal freshwater and brackish wetland sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 115, 15–30.
  43. Nobrega, G.N.; Ferreira, T.O.; Neto, M.S.; Queiroz, H.M.; Artur, A.G.; Mendonca, E.D.; Silva, E.D.; Otero, X.L. Edaphic factors controlling summer (rainy season) greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 and CH4) from semiarid mangrove soils (NE-Brazil). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 542, 685–693.
  44. Arai, H.; Hadi, A.; Darung, U.; Limin, S.H.; Hatano, R.; Inubushi, K. A methanotrophic community in a tropical peatland is unaffected by drainage and forest fires in a tropical peat soil. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 2014, 60, 577–585.
  45. Maher, D.T.; Santos, I.R.; Golsby-Smith, L.; Gleeson, J.; Eyre, B.D. Groundwater-derived dissolved inorganic and organic carbon exports from a mangrove tidal creek: The missing mangrove carbon sink? Limnol. Oceanogr. 2013, 58, 475–488.
  46. Call, M.; Maher, D.T.; Santos, I.R.; Ruiz-Halpern, S.; Mangion, P.; Sanders, C.J.; Erler, D.V.; Oakes, J.M.; Rosentreter, J.R.; Murray, R.; et al. Spatial and temporal variability of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes over semi-diurnal and spring–neap–spring timescales in a mangrove creek. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 150, 211–225.
  47. Sotomayor, D.; Corredor, J.E.; Morell, J.M. Methane flux from mangrove sediments along the Southwestern coast of Puerto Rico. Estuaries 1994, 17, 140–147.
  48. Alongi, D.M.; Tirendi, F.; Trott, L.A. Benthic decomposition rates and pathways in plantations of the mangrove Rhizophora apiculata in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 2000, 194, 87–101.
  49. Alongi, D.M.; Wattayakorn, G.; Pfitzner, J. Organic carbon accumulation and metabolic pathways in sediments of mangrove forests in Southern Thailand. Mar. Geol. 2001, 179, 85–103.
  50. Robinson, C.; Li, L.; Prommer, H. Tide-induced recirculation across the aquifer–ocean interface. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43, W07428.
  51. Li, X.; Hu, B.X.; Burnett, W.C.; Santos, I.R.; Chanton, J.P. Submarine ground water discharge driven by tidal pumping in a heterogeneous aquifer. Ground Water 2009, 47, 558–568.
  52. Santos, I.R.; Eyre, B.D.; Huettel, M. The driving forces of porewater and groundwater flow in permeable coastal sediments: A review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 98, 1–15.
  53. Gleeson, J.; Santos, I.R.; Maher, D.T.; Golsby-Smith, L. Groundwater-surface water exchange in a mangrove tidal creek: Evidence from natural geochemical tracers and implications for nutrient budgets. Mar. Chem. 2013, 156, 27–37.
  54. Bouillon, S.; Middelburg, J.J.; Dehairs, F.; Borges, A.V.; Abril, G.; Flindt, M.R.; Ulomi, S.; Kristensen, E. Importance of intertidal sediment processes and porewater exchange on the water column biogeochemistry in a pristine mangrove creek (Ras Dege, Tanzania). Biogeosciences 2007, 4, 311–322.
  55. Bouillon, S. Carbon cycle: Storage beneath mangroves. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 282–283.
  56. Stieglitz, T.C.; Clark, J.F.; Hancock, G.J. The mangrove pump: The tidal flushing of animal burrows in a tropical mangrove forest determined from radionuclide budgets. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2013, 102, 12–22.
  57. Kristensen, E.; Bouillon, S.; Dittmar, T.; Marchand, C. Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems: A review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 201–219.
  58. Kristensen, E.; Flindt, M.R.; Ulomi, S.; Borges, A.V.; Abril, G.; Bouillon, S. Emission of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere by sediments and open waters in two Tanzanian mangrove forests. Mar. Ecol. Prog. 2008, 370, 53–67.
  59. Borges, A.V.; Djenidi, S.; Lacroix, G.; Theate, J.-M.; Delille, B.; Frankignoulle, M. Atmospheric CO2 flux from mangrove surrounding waters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 1–4.
  60. Kone, Y.J.M.; Borges, A.V. Dissolved inorganic carbon dynamics in the waters surrounding forested mangroves of the Ca Mau Province (Vietnam). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2008, 77, 409–421.
  61. Linto, N.; Barnes, J.; Ramachandran, R.; Divia, J.; Ramachandran, P.; Upstill-Goddard, R.C. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from mangrove-associated waters of the Andaman Islands, Bay of Bengal. Estuaries Coast. 2014, 37, 381–398.
  62. Jha, C.S.; Rodda, S.R.; Thumaty, K.C.; Raha, A.K.; Dadhwal, V.K. Eddy covariance based methane flux in sundarbans mangroves, India. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 123, 1089–1096.
  63. Bridgham, S.D.; Cadillo-Quiroz, H.; Keller, J.K.; Zhuang, Q. Methane emissions from wetlands: Biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 1325–1346.
  64. Bodelier, P.L.E.; Meima-Franke, M.; Hordijk, C.A.; Steenbergh, A.K.; Hefting, M.M.; Bodrossy, L.; von Bergen, M.; Seifert, J. Microbial minorities modulate methane consumption through niche partitioning. ISME J. 2013, 7, 2214–2228.
  65. Das, S.; Ganguly, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Kumar De, T. Methane flux dynamics in relation to methanogenic and methanotrophic populations in the soil of Indian Sundarban mangroves. Mar. Ecol. 2018, 39, e12493.
  66. Shiau, Y.J.; Chiu, C.Y. Biogeochemical processes of C and N in the soil of mangrove forest ecosystems. Forests 2020, 11, 492.
  67. Watanabe, I.; Takada, G.; Hashimoto, T.; Inubushi, K. Evaluation of alternative substrates for determining methane-oxidizing activities and methanotrophic populations in soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1995, 20, 2.
  68. Schnyder, E.; Bodelier, P.L.E.; Hartmann, M.; Henneberger, R.; Niklaus, P.A. Positive diversity-functioning relationships in model communities of methanotrophic bacteria. Ecology 2018, 99, 714–723.
  69. Sierocinski, P.; Bayer, F.; Yvon-Durocher, G.; Burdon, M.; Großkopf, T.; Alston, M.; Swarbreck, D.; Hobbs, P.J.; Soyer, O.S.; Buckling, A. Biodiversity–function relationships in methanogenic communities. Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 4641–4651.
  70. Ho, A.; Di Lonardo, D.P.; Bodelier, P.L.E. Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix006.
  71. Yu, X.; Yang, X.; Wu, Y.; Peng, Y.; Yang, T.; Xiao, F.; Zhong, Q.; Xu, K.; Xhu, L.; He, Q.; et al. Sonneratia apetala introduction alters methane cycling microbial communities and increases methane emissions in mangrove ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 144, 107775.
  72. Evans, P.N.; Boyd, J.A.; Leu, A.O.; Woodcroft, B.J.; Parks, D.H.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. An evolving view of methane metabolism in the Archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 219–232.
  73. Hanson, R.S.; Hanson, T.E. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 60, 439–471.
  74. Knief, C. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1346.
  75. Shiau, Y.J.; Cai, Y.F.; Lin, Y.T.; Jia, Z.J.; Chiu, C.Y. Community structure of active aerobic methanotrophs in red mangrove (Kandelia obovata) soils under different frequency of tides. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 75, 761–770.
  76. Shiau, Y.J.; Lin, C.W.; Cai, Y.; Jia, Z.; Lin, Y.T.; Chiu, C.Y. Niche differentiation of active methane-oxidizing bacteria in estuarine mangrove forest soils in Taiwan. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1248.
  77. Ettwig, K.; Butler, M.; Le, P.D.; Pelletier, E.; Mangenot, S.; Kuypers, M.; Schreiber, F.; Dutilh, B.E.; Zedelius, J.; de Beer, D.; et al. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 2010, 464, 543–548.
  78. Haroon, M.F.; Hu, S.; Shi, Y.; Imelfort, M.; Keller, J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Yuan, Z.G.; Tyson, G.W. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 2013, 500, 567.
  79. Beal, E.J.; House, C.H.; Orphan, V.J. Manganese- and iron-dependent marine methane oxidation. Science 2009, 325, 184–187.
  80. Ho, A.; Kerckhof, F.M.; Luke, C.; Reim, A.; Krause, S.; Boon, N.; Bodelier, P.L.E. Conceptualizing functional traits and ecological characteristics of methane-oxidizing bacteria as life strategies. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5, 335–345.
  81. Baani, M.; Liesack, W. Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10203–10208.
  82. Cai, Y.F.; Zheng, Y.; Bodelier, P.L.E.; Conrad, R.; Jia, Z.J. Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11728.
  83. Yuan, J.; Ding, W.; Liu, D.; Xiang, J.; Lin, Y. Methane production potential and methanogenic archaea community dynamics along the Spartina alterniflora invasion chronosequence in a coastal salt marsh. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1817–1829.
  84. Yuan, J.J.; Liu, D.Y.; Ji, Y.; Xiang, J.; Lin, Y.X.; Wu, M.; Ding, W.X. Spartina alterniflora invasion drastically increases methane production potential by shifting methanogenesis from hydrogenotrophic to methylotrophic pathway in a coastal marsh. J. Ecol. 2019, 107, 2436–2450.
  85. Knittel, K.; Boetius, A. Anaerobic oxidation of methane: Progress with an unknown process. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 311–334.
  86. Keppler, F.; Hamilton, J.T.G.; Brass, M.; Rockmann, T. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 2006, 439, 187–191.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback