1. Introduction

1.1 Interleukin-3 and Interleukin-3 Receptor

Interleukin-3 (IL-3) is a member of the beta common (β_c) cytokine family, which also includes granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-5. This group of cytokines signals through the activation of heterodimeric cell surface receptors, composed by a cytokine-specific α chain and the shared β_c  subunit [1]. These cytokines signal through the β_c subunit: The activation of IL-3R is thought to involve the sequential assembly of a receptor complex, with an initial step represented by the binding of IL-3 to IL-3Rα (also known as CD123), followed by a second step represented by the recruitment of β_c  subunit and assembly of a receptorial complex, bringing JAK2 molecule together to trigger downstream signaling ^[2][3][2,3].

The extracellular region of IL-3Rα comprises three fibronectin-like (FnIII) domains: Two domains bind IL-3, and a third domain, N-terminal domain (NTD) is highly mobile in the presence of IL-3 and plays a key role in preventing spontaneous receptor dimerization [4]. Thus, the NTD domains exert a double role, protecting from inappropriate receptor signaling and dynamically regulating IL-3R binding and function [4].

IL-3 is a cytokine with multiple biologic functions, mainly produced by activated T-lymphocytes, with an important regulatory activity on the generation of hematopoietic and immune cells [5]. IL-3 is the most pleiotropic cytokine of the β_c  receptor family, stimulating different myeloid cells. It is functionally different from GM-CSF, in that it also stimulates the production and function of hematopoietic stem cells, mast cells and basophils [6]. The β_c  cytokines play an important role in emergency hematopoiesis and immunity after infection or injury [7], but their function is dispensable for hematopoiesis in the steady state, as shown by gene knockout studies in mice [8].

The activity of IL-3 is not limited only to the hemopoietic system, but extends also to the endothelial lineage, as supported by the observation that this cytokine is able to stimulate the proliferation of endothelial cells [9].

1.2. CD123 Is Overexpressed in Many Hematological Malignancies

Studies carried out in the last two decades have shown that IL-3Rα is overexpressed in many hematological malignancies. Many studies have explored in detail the pattern of expression of CD123 in AMLs and in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). Initial studies on AMLs have led to the observation that CD123 is overexpressed on stem/progenitor leukemic cells CD34⁺/CD38⁻, while normal CD34⁺/CD38⁻  normal stem cells apparently do not express CD123 [10]. A subsequent study based on the screening of CD123 expression in various hemopoietic malignancies showed that this receptor chain is frequently expressed at high levels in AMLs and B-ALLs [11]. Testa et al. explored a large set of AML patients and reported that 45% of these patients overexpress IL-3Rα [12]. Importantly, these authors showed that CD123 overexpression on leukemic blasts was associated with increased cycling activity, increased cellularity at diagnosis, hypersensitivity to IL-3 stimulation (with increased Stat5 activation) and poor prognosis [12].

Wittwer et al. have confirmed that high CD123 levels enhance proliferation of leukemic blasts in response to IL-3 but showed also that CD123 overexpression induces a downregulation of CXCR4 [1]. CXCR4 is the receptor of stromal-derived growth factor-1 (SDF-1) and plays an essential role in the regulation of HSC homing and migration. Thus, it was hypothesized that the CD123 overexpression, through CXCR4 downregulation, may induce the egress of BM AML leukemic stem cells (LSCs) into the circulation [13].

Arai and coworkers have explored CD123 expression on 48 de novo AMLs by immunohistochemistry and reported that CD123 expression on AML blasts was associated with a failure to achieve a complete response to initial induction chemotherapy and poor overall survival [14].

Recent studies have explored the expression and he prognostic impact of CD123 expression in pediatric AML, representing about 20% of all pediatric acute leukemias. At the level of bulk leukemic cell population, CD123 was positive in about 70% of samples, frequently co-associated with CD200 expression [15]. CD123 expression was associated with minimal residual disease; the co-expression of CD123 and CD200 had a negative impact on OS and CR rate [15]. Lamble et al. evaluated CD123 expression in 1400 pediatric AMLs and observed that high CD123 expression was strongly associated with disease-relevant cytogenetic abnormalities and with molecular alterations (KMT2A rearrangements and FLT3-ITD mutations) and with poor clinical outcomes compared to AML patients with lower CD123 expression [16]. Veger at al. have evaluated the prognostic impact of 34⁺/38^-/123⁺ LSCs frequency at diagnosis in older AML (aged 60 years or older) [17]. In AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy the median OS was 34.5 months in the group of patients with <0.1% 34⁺/38^-/123⁺ cells compared to 14.6 months in patients with >0.1% 34⁺/38^-/123⁺ cells [17]. However, the percentage of 34⁺/38^-/123⁺ cells had no prognostic impact in patients treated with hypomethylating agents [17].

Other studies have attempted to define the immunophenotypic and molecular properties of AMLs overexpressing CD123. Thus, Testa and coworkers provided evidence that AMLs overexpressing CD123 display some peculiar immunophenotypic features (low CD34 expression and high CD11b and CD14 expression) and are frequently associated with FLT3-ITD mutations ^[18][19][18,19]. Interestingly, a subset of AMLs overexpressing FLT3, in the absence of mutations of this receptor, overexpress also CD123 and may represent a peculiar AML subset, whose proliferation was driven by the overexpressed CD123 and FLT3 [20].

Rollins-Raval and coworkers have confirmed these findings and have reported CD123 overexpression (by immunohistochemistry) in 83% of FLT3-ITD-mutated AMLs and in 62% of AML cases with mutated NPM1 [21]. Brass and coworkers have confirmed these findings through a detailed flow cytometric analysis of CD123 in a very large set of AMLs, showing that CD123 was expressed in the large majority of AMLs, with low expression in erythroid and megakaryocytic leukemia, higher CD123 expression in FLT3-ITD-mutated and NPM1-mutated AMLs [22]. Recently, Perriello et al. reported the analysis of CD123 in a large cohort of 151 NPM1-mutated AMLs and showed that CD123 is highly expressed in NPM1-mutant leukemic cells and, particularly at the level of 34⁺/38^- leukemic stem cells [23]. CD123 expression was further enhanced by FLT3 mutations, frequently co-occurring with NPM1 mutations [23]. Importantly, two studies reported IL3Rα expression at the level of the CD34⁺CD38⁻  cell fraction in FLT3-ITD-mutated AMLs ^[24][25][24,25]. Angelini et al. provided a detailed immunophenotypic characterization of these cells, displaying also CD25 and CD99 expression [25].

Ehninger et al. have explored CD123 and CD33 expression in a cohort of 319 AML patients and showed that AMLs with adverse cytogenetics express CD123 at levels comparable to those with favorable and intermediate subtypes [26]. They confirmed also the high expression of CD123 on FLT3-ITD and NPM1-mutated AMLs [26].

CD123 was shown to be overexpressed in a rare group of undifferentiated AMLs, resembling AMLs with minimal differentiation [27].

Many studies have explored CD123 expression at the level of leukemic progenitor/stem cells, mainly contained in the CD34⁺/CD38⁻ cell fraction. Thus, Guzman and coworkers provided evidence that CD34⁺/CD38⁻/CD123⁺  cells are able to initiate a leukemic process when inoculated into immunodeficient mice [28]. CD34⁺/CD38⁻/CD123⁺  cells were clearly detectable in about 75% of AML patients [29] and their number is predictive of the clinical outcome [30]. More recent studies have explored CD123 expression on the leukemic stem population in the context of the expression on these cells of other membrane markers. Several membrane markers, including CD123, CD33, CLL1, TIM3, CD244, CD47, CD96, CD157 and CD7 were ubiquitously expressed on AML bulk cells at diagnosis and relapse, irrespective of genetic features [31]. Haubner et al. have explored the expression of these membrane antigens on a large set of AMLs at diagnosis and at relapse. CD33, CD123, CLL1, TIM3, CD244 and TIM3 were ubiquitously expressed on AML bulk cells at diagnosis and relapse, irrespective of genetic features [32]. Importantly, for the clinical implications, CD33 and CD123 are homogenously expressed at relapse; CD123 was more expressed than CD33 at the level of LSCs [32].

In another study, Yan and coworkers provided evidence that CD123, as well as CD47 expression on leukemic blasts is related not only to stemness, but also to chemoresistance [33]. The histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin reversed the gene expression profile of CD123⁺  chemoresistant leukemic cells and efficiently targeted chemoresistant leukemic blasts in xenograft mouse models [33]. In line with this observation, the presence of CD34⁺/CD38⁻/CD123⁺  cells de novo AMLs negatively impacts in disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) [34].

Recent studies support the evaluation of CD123 expression as a marker of minimal residual disease (MRD). MRD can be defined as the persistence after therapy of a small burden of leukemic cells, not detectable by standard histopathological criteria (bone marrow morphology); the presence of MRD after therapy is a negative prognostic marker of increased risk of relapse and shorter survival in AML patients [35]. Its detection is of fundamental importance to risk stratification and to define additional treatments [35]. MRD can be assessed through the detection of leukemia-specific molecular abnormalities or though flow cytometry of bone marrow cells [35]. Thus, quantification of NPM1-mutated transcripts after therapy in patients with NPM1-positive AMLs provided a valuable tool to assess MRD and a powerful prognostic information independent of other risk factors [36]. MRD can be detected also by flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow cells using a panel of antigens aberrantly expressed in AML blasts, including CD123 [37]. The evaluation of both molecular and immunophenotypic markers probably represents the best methodology to assess MRD and its evaluation is of paramount importance in the choice of the treatment strategy for each AML patient [38].

These studies imply some considerations about the relationship between clonal evolution and CD123 expression in AMLs. As above discussed, during therapy, the AML cell populations may evolve by either acquiring additional mutations responsible for drug resistance or by losing mutations associated with sensitivity to the treatment (following a process of linear evolution) or by outgrowth of a secondary clone (subclone) following eradication of the major clone at diagnosis (following a process of branching evolution). Therefore, AML cell populations at relapse may have evolved from either clonal or subclonal cell populations, present at diagnosis, with potential acquisition of additional mutations. Thus, either through linear or branching evolution, leukemic cells undergo a process of adaptive clonal evolution to survive to new environmental conditions. These processes of dynamic clonal evolution imply a consistent clonal heterogeneity of AMLs and the extreme difficulty to eradicate the leukemic process through the targeting of a single genetic abnormality. At variance with molecular markers involved in the dynamics of clonal evolution, CD123 is equally expressed in AML bulk cells and leukemic stem cells at initial diagnosis and relapse and therefore its expression is not related to leukemic clonal evolution [32]. The independency of CD123 expression from AML clonal evolution strongly supports CD123 as a potential therapeutic target of AMLs at various disease stages: Initial diagnosis, MRD and relapse.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) represents the malignancy with the most promising clinical applications of CD123 targeted therapy. BPDCN is an extremely rare clonal hematological malignancy of plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors, usually affecting elderly males and presenting in the skin with frequent involvement of the bone marrow, peripheral blood and lymph nodes ^[39][40][39,40]. The epidemiology, pathology, molecular abnormalities and clinical features of BPDCN were recently reviewed ^[39][40][39,40].

Two historical studies have considerably improved the understanding of the physiopathology of this rare neoplasia and have provided the key data for the identification of CD123 as a potential therapeutic target. Thus, Lucio and coworkers have for the first time shown a constant high CD123 expression and have proposed plasmacytoid dendritic cells as the cells of origin of BPDCN [41]. These findings were confirmed by Chaperot et al., showing immune function in leukemic cells similar to plasmacytoid dendritic cells [42]. These authors showed also that CD4⁺/CD56⁺ cells express elevated levels of the IL-3Rα chain: Following incubation with IL-3, the leukemic cells undergo a partial maturation and became a strong inducer of naïve CD4⁺  T cell proliferation [42].

The patients with BPDCN have a negative prognosis when treated with standard chemotherapy. The only treatment inducing durable remissions is the high-dose chemotherapy, followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation [43]. In a large series of 43 patients, the median overall survival was of 8–9 months following treatment with chemotherapy and about 23 months following chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation [44].

Other studies have shown the overexpression of CD123 in some lymphoid malignancies. The screening of B-cell malignancies provided evidence that in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders of mature B-lymphocytes was positive only in hairy cell leukemia [18]. Subsequent studies have confirmed this initial observation, showing also the analysis of CD123 expression helps also to distinguish between hairy cell leukemia and hairy cell leukemia-variant ^[45][46][47][45-47]. The characteristic immunophenotype CD19⁺, CD20⁺, CD11c⁺, CD25⁺, CD103⁺ and CD123⁺  is diagnostic for hairy cell leukemia [48].

While virtually all lymphomas were negative for CD123 expression, neoplastic cells of Hodgkin lymphoma were frequently CD123^{+ [49]} [49].

Other studies have explored in detail CD123 expression in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALLs). Initial studies have shown that B-ALL, but not T-ALL frequently overexpress CD123 ^[11][12][11,12]. This finding was confirmed in subsequent studies, showing also that CD123 overexpression in B-ALL associates with hyperdiploid genotype [50]; furthermore, CD123 is clearly expressed at higher levels in B-ALL blasts than in normal B-lymphoid progenitors/precursors ^[51][52][51,52]. More recently, Angelova et al. have performed a large screening of CD123 expression on a large set of ALLs, showing that CD123 expression was more prevalent in Philadelphia chromosome-positive patients than in Philadelphia chromosome-negative patients [53]. Importantly, Liu et al. reported the existence of a negative correlation between CD123 expression on B-ALL blasts and both disease-free and overall survival [54].

2. Therapeutic CD123 Targeting

2.1. SL-401 (Tagraxofusp)

Initial studies of CD123 targeting were based on the use of the natural ligand IL-3, fused with a cytotoxic drug. To this end, a genetically engineered fusion toxin was generated, composed of the first 388 amino acid residues of diphtheria toxin (DT) with a His-Met (H-M) linker, fused to human IL-3. This DT₃₈₈ exerted a marked cytotoxic effect on CD123⁺  leukemic blasts [55] and was tolerated in primates in vivo up to 100 μg/Kg ^[56][57][56,57]. The level of cytotoxicity exerted by DT₃₈₈  on leukemic blasts was directly related to the level of IL-3Rα/IL-3Rβ expressed on leukemic cells [58]. Importantly, DT₃₈₈  was found to be cytotoxic for cells with properties of leukemic stem cells [59]. The fusion of DT to a variant of IL-3 displaying increased binding affinity (IL-3[K116W]) resulted in the generation of a fusion protein DT₃₈₈IL-3[K116W] more active than DT₃₈₈IL-3 in inducing the killing of leukemic blasts [60].

This fusion protein named SL-401 (tagraxofusp) was introduced in phase I/II clinical studies for the treatment of BPDCN, AML and other hematological malignancies. Preclinical studies have strongly supported the clinical use of SL-401 in BPDCN. BPDCN is an aggressive hematologic malignancy derived from the malignant transformation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. BPDCN represents a distinct disease entity in the group of AMLs and related precursor neoplasms. This neoplasia is characterized by high ubiquitous expression of CD123 and represents an ideal candidate for therapeutic targeting with SL-401. In this context, preclinical studies showed that SL-401 exerted a marked cytotoxic effect against primary BPDCN blasts, that are more sensitive to this drug than AML or ALL primary blasts; SL-401 was more toxic against BPCDN cells than other chemotherapeutic agents; treatment with SL-401 increased the survival of immunodeficient mice inoculated with BPDCN cells [61].

The first clinical trial of SL-401 in BPDCN involved the treatment of 11 patients in the context of a phase I study [52]. The maximum tolerated dose was 12.5 μg/Kg/day; the drug administration was relatively well tolerated, and the reported adverse events were grade 3/4; 78% of patients displayed an objective response, with 55% complete responses after the first cycle of treatment [62]. In 2017, the results of a phase II clinical study involving the treatment of 32 BPDCN patients were presented, showing 84% of objective responses, with 59% of complete responses [63]. A part of responding patients was bridged to stem cell transplantation after a durable response from SL-401 treatment [63].

In December 2018, the. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved SL-401 for adult and pediatric BPDCN on the basis of the results of a recently published open-label, multicohort phase III study in which 47 patients with untreated or relapsed BPDCN received an intravenous infusion of 7 or 12 μg/Kg body on days 1 to 5 of each 21-day cycle. Of the 47 patients, 29 received 12 μg of tagraxofusp as the first-line treatment and 15 as the second- and third-line of treatment [64]. Among the 29 untreated patients, 72% achieved a complete response, 45% went on to undergo stem cell transplantation, with a survival rate of 52% at 24 months; among the 15 previously treated patients, the response rate was 67% and the median overall survival was 8.5 months [64]. Capillary leak syndrome was observed in 19% of the patients and was associated with two deaths [64]. The results of this study provided the basis for a targeted therapy option for patients with BPDCN.

SL-401 was also tested in few pediatric BPDCN patients, providing preliminary evidence of clinical activity [65]. Case report studies support the clinical efficacy of tagraxofusp in combination with azacytidine in BPDCN patients relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [66].

In addition to the above-mentioned studies, additional more recent observations support the rationale of using SL-401 as an IL-3Rα targeting agent in AML patients. Thus, tagraxofusp induced potent cytotoxic activity against CD123-positive AMLs and myelodysplastic syndrome blast cells; furthermore, it exerted also some cytotoxic activity against normal hemopoietic progenitor cells [67]. Thus, this drug was active against hemopoietic cells expressing high or low CD123 levels. Tagraxofusp seemed also able to overcome resistance mechanisms, as those related to the “protection” exerted by stromal cells, reducing CD123 expression on leukemic blasts [64]. Tagraxofusp administration improved the survival of immunodeficient animals xenografted with primary AML cells [67]. For these properties, tagraxofusp was considered as a potential mean to create a bridge to stem cell transplantation [67].

Thus, as above discussed, AMLs represent another potential therapeutic target of SL-401. The results of a phase I clinical trial performed on 45 AML patients, receiving one single infusion of SL-401, showed that the maximum tolerated dose was 12.5 μg/Kg/day, no toxicity grade IV/V adverse events were observed, grade II/III adverse events included fever, hypoalbuminemia, transaminitis, hypotension and hypocalcemia, and few responding patients were observed (one complete response and two partial responses) [68]. Another approach for the therapeutic use of SL-401 in AML consists to treat the minimal residual disease (MRD), usually treated with the traditional consolidation therapy. Thus, a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02270463) is ongoing in patients with AML who are at risk of relapse and are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation [69]. The preliminary results of this trial presented at the 2017 American. Society of Hematology (ASH) Meeting support the safety of the treatment, but the results about the possible efficacy were not yet available and will require additional time to be evaluated [69].

Stephansky and coworkers have explored the possible mechanisms of resistance of leukemic cells to CD123 targeting by SL-401 and observed that a mechanism not dependent upon CD123 expression was responsible for resistance. In fact, these authors showed that resistant leukemic cells downregulated the expression of DPH1, the enzyme that converts histidine 715 on eEF2 to diphthamide, the direct target of ADP ribosylation by diphtheria toxin ^[70][71][70,71]. DPH1 expression was decreased in leukemic cells of patients treated with SL-401 and resistant to this drug; furthermore, DHP1 downmodulation in leukemic cells decreased their sensitivity to SL-401. Interestingly, the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor azacytidine reversed this effect and acted in cooperation with SL-401 to promote the death of AML blasts ^[70][71][70,71]. These observations have supported the development of a clinical trial (NCT 03113643) involving the administration of SL-401 in association with azacytidine at standard dose to refractory/relapsed AML or high-risk myelodysplasia patients.

Few studies have supported the use of SL-401 in the therapy of multiple myeloma. These studies were based on the strategy of targeting the bone marrow microenvironment that in multiple myeloma promotes disease development and progression. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) are increased in bone marrow of multiple myeloma and highly express IL-3R. Targeting of PDCs in bone marrow milieu with SL-401 decreases viability of PDCs, blocks PDC-induced multiple myeloma growth and synergistically increases anti-tumor activity of bortezomib and pomalidomide [72]. Furthermore, IL-3R promotes the progression of osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma [72]. Finally, and importantly, SL-401 decreases the viability of cancer stem-like cells in multiple myeloma [72]. These observations support the experimental use of SL-401 in the treatment of multiple myeloma. SL-401 is currently under evaluation in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients [73]. The first results of this ongoing clinical trial showed that SL-401 is relatively well tolerated in this therapeutic setting and shows some signs of clinical activity [73]. Some multiple myeloma patients develop a secondary, therapy-induced leukemia (tAML), years after they received a treatment for their primary neoplasia. A recent study provided evidence hat years before the development of tAML, these patients possess aberrant preleukemic stem cells highly expressing CD123: these cells harbor TP53 mutations and became the dominant population at the time of leukemia presentation [74].

Other clinical studies are exploring the possible clinical activity of SL-401 in myeloproliferative disorders. A preclinical study showed IL-3R expression in systemic mastocytosis, clonal eosinophilia and a minority population of myelofibrosis [75]. SL-401 is under evaluation in patients with advanced high-risk myeloproliferative disorders, including systemic mastocytosis, myelofibrosis, primary eosinophilic disorders and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) [72]. Preliminary results in this clinical study showed that SL-401 administration is relatively well-tolerated and induced the secondary/adverse events observed in other clinical studies with this drug [76]. On 2018, the results on 20 CMML patients were presented, showing a marked decrease of splenomegaly. Bone marrow complete responses were observed in 30% of patients [77]. Some patients were bridged to stem cell transplantation [77].

Results from 23 patients with myelofibrosis were recently reported, showing that tagraxofusp treatment elicited a spleen response in 56% of patients with a spleen size ≥5 cm at baseline; interestingly, 100% of patients with monocytosis showed a spleen response [78]. Furthermore, treatment with tagraxofusp was associated with an improved quality of life.

Interestingly, a recent study reported the existence of clonal plasmacytoid CD123⁺  dendritic cells in about 20% of CMML patients [76]. Exome sequencing studies showed that these cells have the typical Ras mutations observed in CMML [79]. An excess of plasmacytoid dendritic cells correlates with regulatory T cell accumulation and an increased risk of acute leukemia transformation [79].

As above reported, the K116W variant DT₃₈₈-IL-3 molecule (DT₃₈₈-IL-3[K116W] or SL-501) displayed greater IL-3R binding affinity and cytotoxic activity against AML blasts than SL-401 and possesses low activity against normal hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells ^[57][58][57,58]. A preclinical study showed that SL-401 deplete chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) stem cells and may be used as a strategy to improve the effectiveness of current CML therapy, mainly targeting tumor bulk using tyrosine kinase inhibitors [80].

The Stemline Therapeutics Inc. developed also SL-101, an anti-IL-3R antibody-conjugate in which the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) regions of the antibody were genetically fused to a truncated  Pseudomonas  exotoxin containing its translocation and ADP-ribosylation domains [81].

Han and coworkers have explored the anti-leukemic activity of this antibody-conjugate against AML blasts. In a retrospective analysis of 86 newly diagnosed AML patients, these authors showed that a higher proportion of CD34⁺CD38⁻CD123⁺  leukemic stem cells at remission stages was associated with persistent MRD and predicted shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics [81]. SL-101 was shown to suppress the function of leukemic progenitors, while sparing normal hemopoietic progenitor cells; in xenograft AML models the repopulating capacity of LSCs pretreated with SL-101 in vitro was significantly inhibited [81].

2.2. CSL362 (Taclotuzumab)

The optimal properties of an IL-3R mAb would consist in inhibiting the binding of IL-3 and in activating innate immunity. An antibody responding these two properties was the anti-CD123 mAb 7G3 capable of inhibiting IL-3-mediated proliferation of leukemic cells [82] and of impairing leukemic stem cells in vivo [83]. The 7G3 mAb was humanized and affinity-matured and was engineered in its Fc-domain to improve its cytotoxicity against AML cells: the antibody thus modified was called CSL362 and displayed the same capacity to neutralize IL-3, but displayed increased antibody-dependent cytotoxicity against AML cells compared to 7G3 [84].

For its properties, the CSL 362 antibody entered a plan of clinical development. Pharmacodynamic studies provided evidence that CSL 362 administration to immunodeficient mice xenografted with human AML cells significantly enhanced the antileukemic effect induced by cytarabine/daunoribicin [85]. The administration of CSL 362 induced a dose-dependent decrease of peripheral basophils and plasmacellular dendritic cells, but no significant effects on hemopoietic progenitor/stem cells were observed [86].

A preclinical study in CML showed that CSL 362 was able to markedly reduce the engraftment of CML cells, due to the killing of CD123⁺  LSCs [87]. In mice treated with CSL 362 antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC)-facilitated lysis was mediated mainly by few CML autologous natural killer (NK) cells [87]. Additional preclinical studies definitely showed that CSL 362 in vitro induces ADCC-dependent lysis of AML blasts, as well as of LSC-enriched CD34⁺/CD38⁻/CD123⁺  cells and in vivo reduces leukemic cell growth in AML xenografts in immunodeficient mice [88]. The study of the three-dimensional structure of CD123 allowed us to define the molecular mechanism through which CSL-362 inhibits IL-3R. CSL362 binds to the N-terminal domain (NTD) of IL-3Rα: This domain allows the optimal IL-3 binding to its receptor and is present in two distinct conformations, open and closed [89]. CSL362 can utilize functionally distinct binding sites on IL-3R and can inhibit IL-3 signaling without inhibiting IL-3 binding [89].

Lee et al. explored in more detail the effect of CSL362 on AML cells in suitable preclinical models and provided clear evidence that CSL362 prolonged the survival of immunodeficient mice xenografted with AML cells only when administered together with chemotherapy (cytarabine/daunorubicin), but not when administered alone [90].

CSL362 was tested in a phase I clinical study (NCT01632852) in a group of 40 refractory/relapsing AML patients, showing a clinical response in only two patients, suggesting that the use of this drug alone is not sufficient for the treatment of refractory AML [91]. A second phase I study (NCT01272145) was carried out in a group of AML patients who have achieved a first or a second remission, but who are not candidate for stem cell transplantation and have a high risk of disease relapse [92]: 11 of these patients displayed MRD at baseline and four of these 11 patients converted to negativity after treatment with CSL362; at week 24 after treatment, these four patients remained in complete remission, while the remaining seven patients relapsed before week 24 [93]. The maintenance of an MRD⁻  condition may suggest eradication of the leukemic disease [92]. In more recent clinical trials, the CSL362 antibody was renamed talacotuzumab. Platzbecher et al. recently reported the results of a clinical study based on talacotuzumab administration to elderly, high-risk AML or MDS patients who have failed treatment with hypomethylating agents [94]. 24 AML patients, with a median age of 77 years were explored for response to talacotuzumab and five of these patients displayed a hematological improvement, corresponding to a partial response [95]. These observations suggest a limited benefit of this drug in this patient setting, a phenomenon related also to the compromised immune profile present in these patients (reduced mature NK cells, increased expression of inhibitory NK-cell receptors) [96].

A clinical study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of decitabine plus talacotuzumab versus decitabine alone in AML patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

A factor limiting the efficacy of CSL362 in vivo is the limited number of NK lymphocytes present in some cancer patients. To bypass this limitation, Ernst and coworkers have explored the effectiveness of combining CSL362 with human allogeneic NK cells to kill Hodgkin lymphoma cells showing that this combination was highly effective in killing CD123⁺  lymphoma cells and that CSL362 facilitated NK cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of Hodgkin lymphoma targets in ARF6/PLD-1 [97].

2.3. IMGN632: A CD123-Targeting Antibody Drug-Conjugate

Recently, the development of a CD123-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) was reported, which is composed by a humanized anti-CD123 antibody G4723A linked to a DNA mono-alkylating payload of the indolinobenzodiazepine pseudodimer (IGN) class of cytotoxic compounds (called IMGN632) [85]. The activity of IMGN632 was compared to that of X-ADC, the ADC involving the G4723A antibody linked to a DNA crosslinking IGN payload [98]. Both IMG632 and X-ADC exerted both in vitro and in vivo a potent antileukemic effect, but IMGN632 was >40 fold less cytotoxic to the normal myeloid progenitors than X-ADC [98]. Importantly, IMGN632 exerted anti-leukemic effects at doses well below those causing cytotoxic effects to myeloid progenitors [98]. Finally, IMGN632 exerted a potent anti-leukemic effect in various AML xenograft models [98]. These observations strongly support the clinical development of IMGN632 [98].

Another recent preclinical study provided evidence that IMGN632 was active in promoting the killing of B-ALL blasts [53]. Thus, Angelova and coworkers provided evidence that CD123 expression was more prevalent in B-ALL than in T-ALL; furthermore, within B-ALLs, CD123 expression was more pronounced in Philadelphia chromosome-positive patients [53]. IMGN362 resulted to be highly cytotoxic to B-ALL, with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration corresponding to the range 0.6–20 pM [53]. These observations support a possible clinical use of IMGN632 for B-ALL targeting.

In line with this study, it was recently reported that IMGN632 exerted in vivo a pronounced efficacy against patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) derived from a wide range of ALL subtypes, expressing various levels of CD123 [99].

A recent preclinical study explored the targeting of CD123 in BPDCN using IMGN632, showing significant anti-leukemic effects, even at a dose of IMGN362 10-fold lower than the anticipated therapeutically active dose [100]. Another recent preclinical study showed a synergism between poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition (using olaparib or other PARP inhibitors under development) to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of IMGN362 across different primarily refractory/relapsed AML samples [101]. IMGN362 is currently in phase I evaluation for relapsed/refractory CD123-positive hematological malignancies (NCT 03386513). Recently, the initial safety and antileukemia activity findings from the dose-escalation stage of this trial were reported, based on the analysis of 12 patients (five with relapsed/refractory disease and six at first relapse; seven patients had adverse cytogenetics and 50% had secondary AML) [102]. The administration of the drug was tolerated, and no major adverse events were observed [102]. Of the treated patients 33% achieved a complete response and these data support the continuation of this study and further clinical exploration of IMGN362 ^[102]102].

Interestingly, a recent study explored a possible anti-leukemic synergism of IMGN362 with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax showing that the combination of the two drugs increases the killing of primary AML blasts; in vitro studies on various AML cell lines indicate additive/synergistic effects of the two drugs and in vivo the combination of the two drugs clearly prolongs survival and increases anti-leukemic activity in various AML PDX models [103]. These observations strongly support the clinical exploration of the combination of these two drugs in a clinical trial in AML patients. In another + recent study the same authors showed that the combination of IMGN632 with Azacytidine and with the Bcl2 inhibitor Venetoclax resulted in synergistic induction of cell death of AML cell lines and induced improved survival in various AML patient-derived xenograft models in comparison with Azacytidine plus Venetoclax or of IMGN632 alone [104]. These observations support clinical trials assessing the combination of IMGN632 with Azacytidine and Venetoclax, the standard of care for older AML patients [104].

2.4. Bispecific CD123 Monoclonal Antibodies

Kuo and coworkers have reported the development of a bifunctional fusion anti-CD123 and anti-CD3 (CD123 × CD3 bispecific scFv) [105]. The fusion antibody exhibited several interesting properties, compared to the monospecific anti-CD123 antibody: (i) An increase of target cell-binding affinity; (ii) increased in vivo stability, as evidenced by enhanced serum half-life; (iii) induction of T-cell-mediated target cell killing [105]. Subsequently, Hussuini et al. developed a bispecific antibody, composed by the V^H of one antibody in tandem with the V^L  of the other antibody, with specificity of interaction with the N-extracellular domain of CD123 and the extracellular domain of CD3 in the human T cell receptor complex [106]. The incubation of this CD3xCD123 dual-affinity re-targeting (DART) with AML leukemic blasts induced both activation of T lymphocytes and killing of leukemic blasts [106]. The infusion of the bispecific antibody into immunodeficient mice xenografted with AML blasts resulted in total clearance of peripheral blood leukemic cells and subtotal elimination of leukemic cells in bone marrow [106].

In 2015, the MacroGenics (Rockville, MD, USA) reported the development of MGD006, a novel 589 kDa CD3 × CD123 DART protein produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells [107]. The CD3 × CD123 DART molecule was composed of humanized mouse anti-human CD3 and anti-human CD123 Fv sequences [107]. MGD006 exhibited a potent anti-leukemic activity both in vitro and in vivo and was well tolerated in monkeys in continuous infusion [107]. Al-Hussaini and coworkers reported an extensive characterization of this DART antibody, showing that: (i) CD3 × CD123 induces effector-target cell interaction and promotes T cell activation and proliferation; (ii) CD3 × CD123 induces antigen-specific cytotoxicity against CD123-expressing cell targets and, particularly, AML blasts, by donor T lymphocytes; (iii) CD3 × CD123 DART induces killing of AML blasts also in the presence of stroma; (iv) in vitro studies showed a minimal effect of CD3 × CD123 DART on CD34⁺ progenitors and a reduction of CD14⁺/CD123⁺  monocytes and (v) CD3 × CD123 exerts a robust anti-leukemic activity in vivo [108]. These observations strongly supported the evaluation of this CD3 × CD123 DART in phase I clinical trials in refractory/relapsing AML patients.

MDG-006, with the commercial name of flotatuzumab is being evaluated in phase I/II clinical studies. A phase I study showed that the recommended phase II dose was 500 ng/kg/day. Thirty AML patients are mostly with primary refractory disease and with high-risk disease [109]. Infusion-related cytokine syndrome occurred in 13% of patients and was managed with standard supportive care [109]. Anti-leukemic activity was detected in 67% of evaluable patients with 19% of complete responses [109]; importantly, the complete response rate was 31% among patients with refractory AML, but only 0% among those with relapsed AML [109]. On the basis of these preliminary observations, enrollment to this study was expanded to better define the anti-leukemic activity of flotetuzumab in refractory AML patients and to try to define biomarkers to predict and identify patients more likely to respond to this drug.

Since a previous study suggested that AML patients with an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment, as supported by the detection of an increased expression of genes associated with CD8 lymphocytes, B cells and Th1 cells, CXCL9 and CXCL10, are less likely to respond to anthracycline-based cytotoxic chemotherapy and have a shorter relapse-free survival [110], it was hypothesized that the presence of an immune-enriched gene signature in the bone marrow of AML patients more likely to respond to flotetuzumab-based immunotherapy [111].

The study of patients treated with flotetuzumab allowed to identify the frequency of CD4⁺  cells at baseline as a potential biomarker for identifying patients with a higher risk of developing more severe cytokine release syndrome [112]. Early use of tociluzumab (anti-IL-6 mAb) blunted the severity of cytokine release syndrome and did not affect the response to treatment [112].

Given the short circulating half-life, flotetuzumab needs to be administered as a continuous infusion, thus determining prolonged exposure times, with limited Cmax changes. The use of more stable, long-acting Fc-bearing, CD3-interacting antibodies would abrogate the need for continuous supply but would expose to the risk of cytokine release syndrome due to the high Cmax levels required to maintain appropriate concentrations over several days [113]. Thus, the development of CD3-engaging DART molecules with reduced affinity for CD3 that maintained maximal target cell killing and T cell proliferation, allowed the production of CD3 × CD123 and CD3 × CD19 DART molecules, acting at higher concentrations than wild-type counterpart, but with reduced cytokine releasing capacity [113].

Recent studies have explores the mechanisms of response of AML to Flotezumab and have reported the results of phase I/II clinical studies in refractory/relapsing patients. In an initial study, Vadakekolathu et al. showed that in AML patients, differences in outcomes have been associated with immune transcriptomic profiles of the tumor microenvironment (TME); according to this profile, AMLs can be subdivided into an immune-infiltrated and immune-depleted subgroup [114]. The immune-infiltrated subgroup displayed enrichment in IFN-g-related RNA profiles and showed resistance to chemotherapy but increased probability of response to immunotherapy [114]. In a subsequent study, Vadakekolathu and coworkers showed that immune landscape was highest in TP53-mutant AMLs, an AML subgroup characterized by high resistance to standard induction chemotherapy [115]. Interestingly in a group of 15 refractory/relapsing AMLs with TP53 alterations, 7/15 patients achieved a complete response to treatment with Flotezumab, associated with a median overall survival of 10.3 months (range from 3.3 to 21.3 months) [115]. These observations strongly support additional studies of Flotezumab immunotherapy in patients with AMLs with TP53 alterations [115]. A recent study by Uy and coworkers reported he results of a phase I/II clinica study evaluating the safety profile and the clinical efficacy of Flotezumab as salvage immunotherapy in 88 AML patients with refractory/relapsing disease [116]. The most significant clinical benefit was observe d in patients showing an immune-infiltrated TME, with 26.7% of complete responses, an with a median OS of 10.2 months in patients achieving a complete response [116]. 10-gene signature predicted complete response to Flotezumab treatment in AML patients [116].

Recently, Ravandi and coworkers reported the development of a bispecific monoclonal antibody, XmAb14045 targeting both CD123 and CD3 and stimulating targeted T cell-mediated killing of CD123-expressing cells; this antibody is a full-length immunoglobulin molecule requiring intermittent infusions [117]. Using this molecule, a phase I clinical study was performed and the results on the first 64 treated patients (63 with refractory/relapsed AML and 1 with ALL) were recently reported [117]. Of treated patients 77% experienced a cytokine release syndrome and 11% of grade ≥3. In part A of the study, single agent anti-leukemic activity was evidenced with three complete responses in 23% of treated patients; two responders were bridged to stem cell transplantation and the third remained in remission at week 14+ after initiating therapy [117].

Recently, the development of a dual-targeting triplebody 33-16-123 (SPM-2) agent, with binding sites for target antigens CD33 and CD123, and for CD16 to engage NK as cytolytic effectors was reported [118]. Primary blasts of most AMLs carry at least one of these antigens; blasts from 29 AML patients were lysed at nanomolar concentrations of SPM-2, the optimal lytic effect being observed for leukemic cells with a combined density of CD33 and CD123 above 10,000 molecules/cell [118]. Cell populations phenotypically enriched in leukemic stem cells (CD34⁺CD38⁻) carry increased CD33 and CD123 expression and were lysed even at low SPM-2 concentrations [118].

2.5. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy Targeting CD123

Recent studies of anti-tumor adoptive cellular therapies have explored the potential therapeutic impact of genetically engineered cells. In this context, two types of genetically engineered T cells have been developed: (a) T cell receptor-engineered T lymphocytes that recognize a specific antigen in the context of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) receptors (HLA restricted) and (b) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) transduced T cells that recognize membrane antigens in an HLA-independent and antibody-specific manner. CAR T cells display a combination of various important biologic properties related to the presence of an antibody in terms of the specificity and affinity in the recognition of a target antigen and of T lymphocytes endowed with a long-term biologic function and with a consistent capacity of in vivo circulation [119,120]. CARs are artificial receptors composed of three domains: (i) An extracellular antigen-binding specific domain derived from an antibody’s single chain variable fragment; (ii) a hinge and transmembrane fragment and (iii) an intracellular T-cell signaling domain ^[119][120][119,120]. Furthermore, CAR T cells can be distinguished into first-, second- and third-generation CAR T cells according to the presence of co-stimulatory signals near to the zeta-signal-transducing subunit of the TCR/CD3 receptor complex, and consisting in one or two additional co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD28, CD27, DAP-12 and CD137 ^[119][120][119,120]. These changes contribute to modify the proliferation, survival in vivo and activation of CAR T cells ^[119][120][119,120].

The approval of the anti-CD19 CAR T cell product tisagenlecleucel by FDA and European Medicinal Agency (EMA) for the treatment of relapsed pediatric B-ALL represents the start of a new era in acute leukemia therapy. This decision was based on the data of a phase II trial reporting the results on 75 B-ALL patients treated with tisagenlecleucel, with complete remissions in 81% of patients at three months, and event-free survival rates of 73% and 50% at 6 and 12 months, respectively [121]. Unfortunately, the results obtained in B-ALL have not yet been translated at the level of AML, where the progress was hampered by the difficulty to find a suitable targetable membrane antigen [122]. Recent preclinical and clinical studies are exploring the possible role of CD123 as a target of specifically engineered CAR T cells.

In 2013, Tettamanti and coworkers have transduced cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells with a retroviral vector (a first generation CD123 CAR) encoding an anti-CD123 CAR; transduced CIK cells were able to kill AML cell lines and primary AML leukemic blasts, including leukemic progenitor/stem cell populations [123]. The same group reported in 2014 a third generation CD123 CAR containing CD248 and OX490 as co-stimulatory molecules: CIK cells transduced with this vector exhibited potent anti-leukemic activity and had only a limited inhibitory effect on normal bone marrow progenitor/stem cells in xenograft models [124].

Mardiros and coworkers reported the development of CARs containing a CD123 specific scFv in combination with a CD28 co-stimulatory domain: T lymphocytes obtained from AML patients were modified to express CD123 CARs and acquired the capacity to lyse autologous AML blasts in vivo in a xenogeneic model of AML [125]. These CD123 CARs did not kill normal hemopoietic progenitors.

Gill and coworkers using a second generation CD123 CAR, containing 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain, showed efficient elimination of leukemic cells in a xenograft model of AML [126]. However, these authors reported a marked inhibition of normal hematopoiesis in a model of hematopoietic reconstitution in immunodeficient mice using human fetal liver cells as a source of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells [126]. The results of this study at variance with those observed in other studies with CD123 CARs using human adult bone marrow as a source of HSCs/HPCs is probably related to the higher expression of CD123 on fetal liver compared to bone marrow progenitors [126].

Potent CD19-directed CAR T cells immunotherapies have been used for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. However, CD-19-negative relapses are a major problem of this treatment, occurring in 30–40% of treated patients [127]. In an attempt to bypass this problem, Ruella and coworkers explored in preclinical models the possible strategy based on CD123 targeting [128]. Thus, these authors have shown that CD123 is highly expressed on leukemia-initiating cells and in primary CD19-negative patient leukemic blasts at diagnosis and at relapse after CAR T 19 administration [128]. Importantly, using an antigen-loss CD19-negative relapse xenograft model, it was provided evidence that CAR T 123, but not CAR T 19, recognized leukemic blasts, eradicated CD19-negative leukemia and prolonged survival of leukemic animals [128]. Furthermore, the combined use of CAR T 19 and CAR T 123 prevented antigen-loss relapses in xenograft models [128]. These observations support a strategy based on targeting CD19 and CD123 on leukemic blasts as a tool for both the treatment and the prevention of antigen-loss relapses after CD19-directed CAR T19 therapies.

Given the consistent hematological toxicities observed in a preclinical model of human leukemia treated with CAR T 123, three different strategies for T cell termination have been explored: (i) Short-persisting messenger RNA-modified CD123-redirected CAR T cells (RIVA-CAR T 123); (ii) lentivirally transduced CD123-redirected CAR T cells (CAR T 123), subsequently depleted with the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody Alenutuzumab and (iii) CAR T 123 co-expressing surface CD20 protein (CAR T 123-CD20), subsequently depleted with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab [129]. Importantly, all these T-cell termination strategies maximized the therapeutic efficacy and overcome the potential toxicities for the normal hemopoietic system of AML CAR T 123 immunotherapy [129].

It is important to note that the potential toxicities of CAR T 123 immunotherapy are related to the recognition of low CD123-positive healthy tissues.

Another strategy to minimize the potential toxicity of CAR T 123 consisted in evaluating the effect of context-dependent variables capable of modulating CAR T cell functional profiles, such as CAR expression, CAR binding affinity and target antigen density [127]. Computational biology structural analysis allowed us to identify mutations in the anti-CD123 CAR antigen binding domain that can alter CAR binding affinity and CAR expression, without altering the general properties of these engineered T cells [127]. This strategy allowed the production of CD123 T cells with a good safety profile in terms of reduced capacity to affect normal tissues with low CD123 expression [130].

Recently, a new CAR T cell platform was developed using the expression of the toll receptor-like adaptor molecule, MYD88, and the tumor-necrosis factor family member CD40, tethered to the CAR molecule through a 2A linker system, providing a constitutive signal that drives CAR T proliferative, survival and anti-tumor signals to CD19⁺ and CD123⁺  hematological cancers [131]. However, the robust anti-tumor activity displayed by these CAR T cells was associated with induction of cachexia in animal models that requires specific strategies to reduce cytokine toxicity, such as administration of anti-TNFα antibody or selection of low cytokine producing T lymphocytes [131].

Other preclinical studies were based on the development of CAR T targeting both CD123 and CD33: The rationale of a CAR T expressing both anti-CD123 and anti-CD33 units consists in providing an optimal mechanism to target both bulk disease and leukemic stem cells [132]. The experimental studies carried out using CD123b-CD33bc CAR T cells exhibited a pronounced anti-leukemia activity, eliminating both the bulk and the leukemic stem cell population in primary AML samples [132]. Given the high potency of this double CAR T cell population, a safety-switch to protect against the potency of CAR T was developed [132].

Other studies reported the optimization of the procedures for the production of CAR T 123 involving human NK cells as a cellular target for anti-tumor therapy [133].

At this moment, CAR T 123-based immunotherapy is being investigated in 11 clinical trials for AML. In 2015, Luio et al. reported a case report of a single relapsing AML patient treated with CAR T 123 cells, transduced using a fourth generation, apoptosis-inducible lentiviral CAR targeting CD123 [134]. The patient achieved a partial response and experienced an acute cytokine release syndrome, controlled by a single dose of Tolicizumab [134].

At the moment, the most consistent clinical experience was performed with the CAR T 123 reported by Mardiros et al. in 2013 [135], developed as a clinical drug by the Mustang Bio Inc. and called MB-102. MB-102 is under evaluation in a phase I clinical trial in AML and BPDCN. Preliminary results on this ongoing clinical trial were presented at the 2017 ASH Meeting and at the American Association Carncer Research (AACR) Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy (November 2018) ^[135][136][135,136]. To date, 18 patients have been enrolled and nine of them (seven with AML and two with BPDCN) have been treated. AML patients were heavily pretreated and all received allo-HSCT: Two patients were treated at 50 × 10⁶ dose of CAR T cells and one of them showed a response and received a second CAR123 T cell infusion and presented a decrease of leukemic blasts from 77% to about 1%; five patients received a higher dose level (200 × 10⁶) and two of them achieved a complete response and the remaining three had a stable disease ^[136][137][136,137]. The two BPDCN patients were treated at a dose of 100 × 10⁶  CAR123 T cells and one of them achieved a complete response. Importantly, in all patients the treatment was well tolerated, and patients showed only reversible and manageable toxicities, no patient displayed grade 3 or above cytokine release syndrome; finally, no treatment-related cytopenias were observed up to 12 weeks after the end of the treatment ^[136][137][136,137]. In 2018, the Food and Drug Administration has granted Orphan and Drug Designation to MB-102 for the treatment of BPDCN.

A trial on CAR T 123 was performed at the University of Pennsylvania using infusions of “bio-degradable” CAR T 123 cells (NCT2623852): These CAR T 123 cells were manufactured by electroporation of mRNA encoding the CAR and thus, at variance with CAR T cells transduced with lentivirus, have a limited capacity of expansion in vivo [138].

Thus, no significant anti-leukemic activity was observed in a clinical trial based on the use of these CAR T 123 cells; however, these cells were transiently detected in vivo and did not induce the release of cytokines [137]. This favorable safety profile supported the development of a phase-I trial of lentivirally-transduced second-generation CAR T 123 (CD123 CAR-41BB-CD3ζ); the treatment includes also a possible subsequent rescue allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation possibly related to induction of aplasia related to CD123 expression on hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, with a conditioning regimen for the allogeneic HSCT involving the T-cell depleting agent Alemtuzumab to purge the CAR T 123 population in vivo.

The results of the various ongoing phase I clinical trials involving different CAR T 123 cell preparations will be essential to assess the real impact of this new CD123 targeting immunotherapy in the treatment of refractory/relapsing AML patients. The combination of allogeneic HSCT with CAR T cell therapy could represent the optimal strategy in the future for the treatment of relapsing/refractory AML patients.

Recent preclinical studies reported various strategies to improve the efficacy and to reduce the toxicity of CAR T cells. Mu and coworkers, to improve the efficacy and persistence in vivo of CAR T cells developed IL-15 expressing CAR123 T cells [138]. The results of these studies showed that CAR123 T cells expressing IL-15 resulted in an enhancement of effector anti-AML effect in vitro and in vivo [138].

A second study addressed the problem of controlling CAR123 T cell activity redirecting these cells using a switch-controllable universal CAR T platform (UniCAR) based on two main components: (a) A non-reactive, inducible second-generation CAR with CD28/CD3ζ stimulation for inert manipulation of T cells (UniCAR T) and (b) soluble targeting modules TM allowing UniCAR T reactivity in an antigen-specific manner [139]. A UniCAR T 123 displayed an efficient cytotoxic activity against patient-derived CD123^high  leukemic cells [139]. Importantly, activation, cytolytic activity and cytokine release were strictly switch-controlled; furthermore, in contrast to conventional CAR T 123, UNICAR T 123 cells discriminate between CD123^high malignant leukemic cells and CD123^low  healthy tissues [139]. Recently, the preliminary results on 3 AML patients with refractory/relapsed AMLs with >20% of CD123⁺ leukemic blasts were reported: all these three patients have reported a clinical response, with one partial remission and two complete remissions with incomplete hematologic recovery; in one of these patients leukemic disease was under control 100 days after uniCART infusion [140].

3. Summary

The interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain (IL-3R), more commonly referred to as CD123, is widely overexpressed in various hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, hairy cell leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma and particularly, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic neoplasm (BPDCN). Importantly, CD123 is expressed at both the level of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) and more differentiated leukemic blasts, which makes CD123 an attractive therapeutic target. Various agents have been developed as drugs able to target CD123 on malignant leukemic cells and on the normal counterpart. Tagraxofusp (SL401, Stemline Therapeutics), a recombinant protein composed of a truncated diphtheria toxin payload fused to IL-3, was approved for use in patients with BPDCN in December of 2018 and showed some clinical activity in AML. Different monoclonal antibodies directed against CD123 are under evaluation as antileukemic drugs, showing promising results either for the treatment of AML minimal residual disease or of relapsing/refractory AML or BPDCN. 

Bibliography

1. Broughton S., Dhagat U., Hercus T.R., Nero T., Grinbaldeston M., Bonder C., Lopez A.F., Parker M.W. The GM-CSF/IL-3/IL-5 cytokine receptor family: From ligand recognition to initiation of signaling.  Rev. 2012;250:277–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01164.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Hercus T.R., Dhagak U., Kan W., Broughton S., Nero T., Perugini M., Sandow J.J., D’Andrea R.J., Ekert P.G., Hughes T., et al. Signaling of the β_cfamily of cytokines. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24:189–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.03.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Hercus T.R., Broughton S., Ekert P., Ramshaw H., Perugini M., Grinbalsdeston M., Woodcock J.M., Thomas D., Pitson S., Hughes T., et al. The GM-CSF receptor family: Mechanism of activation and implications for disease. Growth Factors. 2012;30:63–75. doi: 10.3109/08977194.2011.649919. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Broughton S., Hercus T.R., Nero T.L., Kan W.L., Barry E.F., Dottore M. A dual role for the N-terminal domain of the IL-3 receptor in cell signaling.  Commun. 2018;9:386. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02633-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Ihle J.N. Interleukin-3 and hematopoiesis.  Immunol. 1992;51:65–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Broughton S., Nero T.L., Dhogat U., Kan W.L., Hercus T.R., Tvogorov D., Lopez A.F., Parker M.W. The βc receptor family-structural insights and their functional implications. 2015;74:247–258. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.02.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Nishinakamura R., Miyajima A., Mee P.J., Tybulewicz V.L., Hurray R. Hematopoiesis in mice lacking the entire granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3/interleukin-5 functions. 1996;88:2458–2464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Brizzi M.F., Garbarino G., Rossi P.R., Pagliardi G.L., Arduino C., Avanzi G.C., Pegoraro L. Interleukin-3 stimulates proliferation and triggers endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 gene activation of human endothelial cells.  Clin. Investig. 1993;91:2887–2892. doi: 10.1172/JCI116534. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Testa U., Pelosi E., Frankel A. CD123 is a membrane biomarker and a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies.  Res. 2014;2:4. doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-2-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Jordan C.T., Upchurch D., Szilvassy S.J., Guzman M.L., Howard D.S., Pettigrew A.L., Meyerrose T., Rossi R., Grimes B., Rizzieri D.A., et al. The interleukin-3 receptor alpha is a unique marker for human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells. 2000;14:1777–1784. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401903. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Munoz L., Nomdedu J.F., Lopez O., Comier M.J., Bellido M., Aventin A., Brunet S., Sierra J. Interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain (CD123) is widely expressed in hematologic malignancies. 2001;86:1261–1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Testa U., Riccioni R., Coccia E., Stellacci E., Samoggia P., Latagliata R., Mariani G., Rossini A., Battistini A., Lo-Coco F., et al. Elevated expression of IL-3Ralpha in acute myelogenous leukemia is associated with enhanced blast proliferation, increased cellularity and poor prognosis. 2002;100:2980–2988. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0852. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Wittwer N.L., Brumatti G., Marchant C., Sandow J.J., Pudney M.K., Dottore M., D’Andrea R.J., Lopez A.F., Ekert P.G., Ramshaw H.S. High CD123 levels enhance proliferation is response to IL-3, but reduce chemotaxis by downregulating CXCR4 expression. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1067–1079. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Arai N., Homma M., Abe M., Baba Y., Murai S., Watanuki M., Kawaguchi Y., Fujiwara S., Kabasawa N., Tsukamoto H., et al. Impact of CD123 expression, analyzed by immunohistochemistry, on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.  J. Hematol. 2019;109:539–544. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02616-y. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Kandeel EZ., Madney Y., Eldin DN., Shafik NF. Overexpression of CD200 and CD123 is a major influential factor in the clinical course of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Mol Pathol 2021; 118: 104597.
16. Lamble AJ., Bradersen LE., Alonzo TA., Wang J., Gerbing RB., Pardo l., Sung L., Tasian SK., Cooper TM., Kolb EA., et al. Correlation of CD123 expression level with diverse characteristics and outcomes in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children Oncology Group. Blood 2019; 134: supll.1, abst. 459.
17. Veger F., Nicolau-Travers ML., Bertoli S., Rieu JB., Tavitian S., Bories P., Luqueut P., De Mas V., Largeaud L., Sarry A., et al. 34⁺/38^-/123⁺ leukemic stem cells frequently predict outcome in older acute myeloid leukemia patients treated by intensive chemotherapy but not hypomethylating agents. Cancers 2020; 12: 1174.
18. Testa U., Riccioni R., Diverio D., Rossini A., Lo-Coco F., Peschle C. Interleukin-3 receptor in acute leukemia. 2004;18:219–226. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403224. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Riccioni R., Diverio D., Riti V., Buffolino S., Mariani G., Boe A., Cedrone M., Ototne T., Foà R., Testa U. Interleukin (IL)-3/granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor /IL-5 receptor alpha and beta chains are preferentially expressed in acute myeloid leukemias with mutated FMS-related tyrosine 3 kinase receptor.  J. Haematol. 2009;144:376–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07491.x.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Riccioni R., Pelosi E., Riti V., Castelli G., Lo-Coco F., Testa U. Immunophenotypic features of acute myeloid leukemia patients exhibiting high Flt3 expression not associated with mutations.  J. Haematol. 2011;153:33–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08577.x.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Rollins-Raval M., Pillai R., Mitsuhashi-Warita T., Metha R., Boyadzsin M., Djokic M., Roth C. CD123 immunohistochemical expression in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with underlying FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations.  Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2013;21:212–217. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e318261a342.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Brass A., de Haas V., van Stigt A., Jongen-Lovrencic M., Beverloo H.B., de Mervelde J.G., Zwaan C.M., van Dongen J., Leusen J., van der Velden V. CD123 expression levels in 846 acute leukemia patients based on standardized immunophenotyping.  Part B Clin. Cytom. 2019;96:142–143. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21745.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Perriello VM., Gionfriddo I., Milono F., Mezzasoma F., Morra A, Spinelli O. Rambaldi A., Annibali O., Avvisati G., Di Raimondo F., et al. CD123 is constantly expressed on NPM1-mutated AML c ells. Cancers 2021; 13:496.
24. Al-Mawali A., Gillis D., Lewis I. Immunoprofiling of leukemic stem cells CD34⁺/CD38⁻/CD123⁺delineate FLT3/ITD-positive clones.  Hematol. Oncol. 2016;9:61. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0292-z. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Angelini D.F., Ottone T., Guerrera G., Lavorgna S., Cittadini M., Buccisano F., De Bardi M., Gargano F., Maurillo L., Divona M., et al. A leukemia-associated CD34/CD123/CD25/CD99⁺immunophenotype identifies FLT3-mutated clones in acute myeloid leukemia.  Cancer Res. 2015;21:3977–3985. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3186. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Ehninger A., Kramer M., Rollig C., Thiede C., Bornhauser M., von Bonin M., Wermke M., Feldmann A., Bachmann M., Ehninger G., et al. Distribution and levels of cell surface expression of CD33 and CD123 in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2014;4:e218. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Weinberg O.K., Hasserjian R.P., Baraban E., Ok C.Y., Geyer J.T., Phillip J., Kurzer J.H., Rogers H.J., Nardi V., Stone R.M., et al. Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genomic findings of acute undifferentiated leukemia and comparison to acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation: a study from the bone marrow pathology group.  Pathol. 2019;32:1373–1385. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0263-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Guzman M.L., Neering S.J., Upchurch D., Grimes B., Howard D.S., Rizzieri D.A., Luger S.M., Jordan C.T. Nuclear factor B is constitutively activated in primitive acute human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. 2011;98:2301–2307. doi: 10.1182/blood.V98.8.2301. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Hwang K., Park C.J., Jang S., Chi H.S., Kim D.Y., Lee J.H., Im H.J., Seo J.J. Flow cytometric quantification and immunophenotyping of leukemic stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia.  Hematol. 2012;91:1541–1546. doi: 10.1007/s00277-012-1501-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Vergez F., Green A.S., Tamburin J., Sany I.F., Gaillard B., Camillet-Lefebvre P., Pennetier M., Neyret A., Chapuis N., Itah N., et al. High levels of CD34⁺CD38^low/CD123⁺blasts are predictive of an adverse outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.  2011;96:1792–1798. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.047894.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Pelosi E., Castelli G., Testa U. Targeting LSCs through membrane antigens selectively or preferentially expressed in these cells. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2015;55:336–346. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2015.07.015.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Haubner S., Perna F., Kohnke T., Schmidt C., Berman S., Augsberger C., Scnorfeil F.M., Krupka C., Lichtenegger F.S., Liu X., et al. Coexpression profile of leukemic stem cell markers for combinatorial targeted therapy in AML. 2019;33:64–74. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0180-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Yan B., Chen Q., Shimada K., Tang M., Li H., Gurumurthy A., Khoury J.D., Xu B., Huang S., Qiu Y. Histone deacetylase inhibitor targets CD123/CD47 positive cells and reverse chemoresistant phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia. 2019;33:931–944. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0279-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Zahran A.M., Shaker S., Rayan A., El-Badawy O., Fattah M.A., Alio A.M., ElBadre H.M., Hetta H.F. Survival outcomes of CD34⁺CD38⁻LSCs and their expression of CD123 in adult AML patients.  2018;9:34056–34065. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Ravandi F., Walter R.B., Freeman S.D. Evaluating measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2018;2:1356–1366. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Ivet A., Hills R.K., Simpson M.A., Jovanovic J.V., Gilkes A., Grech A., Patel Y., Bhudia N., Farah H., Mason J., et al. Assessment of minimal residual disease in standard-risk AML.  Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:422–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Coustan-Smith E., Song G., Shurtleff S., Yeoh A.E., Yeoh A.E., Chng W.J., Chen S.P., Rubnitz J.E., Pui C.H., Dowing J.R., et al. Universal monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. JCI Insights. 2018;3:98561. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98561.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Jongen-Lavrencic M., Grob T., Hanekamp D., Kavelaars F.G., Al Hinai A., Zeilemaker A., Erpelinck-Verschueren C.A.J., Gradowska P.L., Meijer R., Cloos J., et al. Molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.  Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1189–1199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716863. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Venugopal S., Zhou S., Jamal S., Lane A.A., Mascarenhas J. Blastic plasmocytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.  Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 in press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Sapienza M.R., Pileri A., Derenzini E., Melle F., Motta G., Fiori S., Calleri A., Pimpinelli N., Tabanelli V., Pileri S. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: State of the arty and prospects. 2019;11:595. doi: 10.3390/cancers11050595.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Lucio P., Parreira A., Orfao A. CD123hi dendritic cell lymphoma: An unusual case of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.  Intern. Med. 1999;131:549–550. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-7-199910050-00035.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Chaperot L., Bendriss N., Manches O., Gressin R., Maynadie M., Trimoreau F., Orfeuvre H., Corront B., Feuillard J., Sotto J.J., et al. Identification of a leukemic counterpart of the plasmacytoid dendritic cells. 2001;97:3210–3217. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.10.3210.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Ros-Weil D., Dietrich S., Boumendil A., Polge E., Bron D., Carreras E., Iriondo Atienza A., Arcese W., Beelen D.W., Cornelissen J.J., et al. Stem cell transplantation can provide durable disease control in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: A retrospective study from the European group and bone marrow transplantation. 2013;121:440–446. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-448613. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Pagano L., Valentini G.C., Pulsoni A., Fisogni S., Carluccio P., Mannelli F., Lunghi M., Pica G., Onida F., Cattaneo C., et al. Blast plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with leukemic presentation: An Italian multicenter study. 2013;98:239–246. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.072645. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Del Giudice I., Matutes E., Morilla R., Morilla A., Owusu-Ankomah K., Rafiq F., A’Hem R., Delgado J., Bazerbashi M.B., Catovsky D. The diagnostic value of CD123 in B-cell disorders with hairy or villous lymphocytes. 2004;89:303–308.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Venkatam G., Aguhar C., Kretiman R., Yuan C., Stetler-Stevenson M. Characteristic CD103 and CD123 expression pattern defines hairy cell leukemia.  J. Clin. Pathol. 2011;136:625–630. doi: 10.1309/AJCPKUM9J4IXCWEU. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Shao K., Calvo K.R., Grouborg M., Temhore P.R., Kreitman R.J., Stetler-Stevenson M., Yuan C.M. Distinguishing hairy cell leukemia variant from hairy cell leukemia: Development and validation of diagnostic criteria.  Res. 2013;37:401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.11.021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Grever M.R., Abdel-Wahab O., Andritsos L.A., Banerji V., Barrientos J., Blachly J.S., Call T.G., Catovsky D., Dearden C., Demeter J., et al. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with classic hairy cell leukemia. 2017;129:553–560. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-689422.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Fromm J.R. Flow cytometric analysis of CD123 is useful for immunophenotyping classical Hodgkin lymphoma.  Part B Clin. Cytom. 2011;80B:91–99. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20561. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Djokic M., Bjorklund E., Blennow E., Mazur J., Soderhall S., Powirt A. Overexpression of CD123 correlates with hyperdiploid genotype in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 2009;94:1016–1019. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.000299.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Hassanein N., Alancia F., Perkinson K., Buckley P., Lagoo A. Distinct expression patternbs of CD123 and CD34 on normal bone marrow B-cell precursors (“hematogenes”) and B lymphoblastic leukemia blasts.  J. Clin. Pathol. 2009;132:573–580. doi: 10.1309/AJCPO4DS0GTLSOEI. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Constant-Smith E., Song G., Clark C., Key L., Liu P., Mehpooya M., Stow P., Su X., Shrleff S., Pui C.H., et al. New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 2011;117:6267. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324004.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Angelova E., Audette C., Kovtun Y., Daver N., Wang S.A., Pierce S., Konoplev S.V., Kogheer H., Jogersen J.L., Konopleva M., et al. CD123 expression patterns and selective targeting with a CD123-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (IMGN632) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 2019;104:749–755. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.205252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Liu J., Tan X., Ma Y.Y., Gao L., Kong P., Peng X.G., Zhang X., Zhang C. Study of the prognostic value of aberrant antigen in patients with acute B lymphocytic leukemia.  Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19:e349–e358. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.03.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Frankel A.E., McCubrey J.A., Miller M.S., Delatte S., Ramage J., Kiser M., Kucera G.L., Alexander R.L., Beran M., Tagge E.P., et al. Diphteria toxin fused to human interleukin-3 is toxic to blasts from patients with myeloid leukemias. 2000;14:576–585. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401743. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Cohen K.A., Liu T.F., Cline J.M., Wagner J.D., Hall P.D., Frankel A.E. Toxicilogy and pharmacokinetics of DT₃₈₈IL3, a fusion protein consisting of a truncated diphteria toxin (DT₃₈₈) linked to human interleukin 3 (IL3) in cynomolgous monkeys.  Lymphoma. 2004;45:1647–1656. doi: 10.1080/10428190410001663572.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Cohen K.A., Liu T.F., Cline J.M., Wagner J.D., Hall P.D., Frankel A.E. Safety evaluation of DT₃₈₈IL3, a diphteria toxin/interleukin 3 fusion protein, in cynomolgus monkey. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2005;54:799–806. doi: 10.1007/s00262-004-0643-4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Testa U., Riccioni R., Biffoni M., Diverio D., Lo-Coco F., Foà R., Peschle C., Frankel A.E. Diphteria toxin fused to variant human interleukin-3 induces cytotoxicity of blasts from patients with acute myeloid leukemia according to the level of interleukin-3 receptor expression. 2005;106:2527–2529. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0540. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Yalcintepe L., Frankel A.E., Hogge D.F. Expression of interleukin-3 receptor subunits on defined subpopulations of acute myeloid leukemia blasts predicts the cytotoxicity of diphtheria toxin interleukin-3 fusion protein against malignant progenitors that engraft in immunodeficient mice. 2006;108:3530–3537. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-013813. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Hogge D.F., Yalcintepe L., Wong S.H., Gerhard B., Frankel A.E. Variant diphtheria toxin-interleukin-3 fusion proteins with increased receptor affinity have enhanced cytotoxicity against acute myeloid leukemia progenitors.  Cancer Res. 2006;12:1284–1291. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2070. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Angelot-Delettre F., Roggy A., Frankel A.E., Lamarthee B., Seilles E., Biichle S., Royer B., Deconinck E., Rowinsky E.K., Brook C., et al. In vivo and in vitro sensitivity of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms to SL-401, an interleukin-3 receptor targeted biologic agent. 2015;100:223–230. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.111740. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Frankel A.E., Woo J.H., Ahn C., Pemmaraju N., Medeiros B.C., Carraway H.E., Frankfust O., Forman S.J., Yang A.E., Konopleva M., et al. Activity of SL-401, a targeted therapy directed to interleukin-3 receptor, in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm patients. 2014;124:385–392. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-566737.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Pemmaraju N., Sweet K.L., Lane A.A., Stein A.S., Vasu S., Blum W., Rizzieri D.A., Wang E.S., Duvic M., Aung P., et al. Results of pivotal phaser 2 trial of SL-401 in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) 2017;130:1298.[Google Scholar]
64. Pemmaraju N., Lane A.A., Sweet K.L., Stein A.S., Vasu S., Blum W., Rizzieri D.A., Wang E.S., Dovic M., Sloan J.M., et al. Tagraxofusp in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic-cell neoplasm.  Engl. J. Med. 2019;380:1628–1637. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815105.[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Sun W., Liu H., Kim Y., Karras N., Pawloska A., Toomey D., Kyono W., Gaynon P., Rosenthal J., Stein A. First pediatric experience of SL-401, a CD123-targeted therapy, in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: Report of three cases.  Hematol. Oncol. 2018;11:61. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0604-6.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Wang SY., Thomessen K., Kurch L., Opitz S., Granke GN., Bech E., Platzbecher U., Kayser S. Combination of tagraxofusp and azacytidine is an effective option for relapsed blastic plasmocytoid dendritic cell neoplasm after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Lyemphoma Myeloma Leuk 2021; 21: e579-e5872.
67. Mani R., Goswami S., Gopalakrishnan B., Ramaswamy R., Wasmuth R., Tran M., Mo X., Gordon A., Bucci D., Lucas D.M., et al. The interleukin-3 receptor CD123 targeted SL-401 mediates potent cytotoxic activity against CD34⁺CD123⁺ cells from acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients and healthy donors.  2018;103:1288–1297. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.188193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Frankel A., Liu J.S., Rizzieri D., Hogge D. Phase I clinical study of diphtheria toxin-interleukin 3 fusion protein in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia.  Lymphoma. 2008;49:543–553. doi: 10.1080/10428190701799035. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Lane A.A., Sweek K.L., Wang E.S., Bonnellan W.B., Walter R.B., Stein A.S., Rizzieri D.A., Carraway H.E., Mantzar I., Prebet T., et al. Results from ongoing phase 2 trial of SL-401 as consolidation therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission with high relapse risk including minimal residual disease (MRD) 2016;128:215. [Google Scholar]
70. Stephansky J., Togami K., Ghandi M., Montero J., von Egypt N., Lindsay R., Brooks C., Aster J.C., Johannessen C., Lane A.A. Resistance to SL-401 in AML and BPDCN is associated with loss of diphtamide synthesis pathway enzyme DPH1 and is reversible by azacytidine. 2017;170:797. [Google Scholar]
71. Tagami K., Pastika T., Stephansky J., Ghandi M., Christie A.L., Jones K.L., Johnson C.A., Lindsay A.W., Brooks C.L., Letai A., et al. DNA methyltransferase inhibition overcomes diphtamide pathway deficiencies underlying CD123-targeted treatment resistance.  Clin. Investig. 2019 doi: 10.1172/JCI128571. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Ray A., Das D.S., Song Y., Macri V., Richardson P., Brooks C.L., Chauhan D., Anderson K.C. A novel agent SL-401 induces anti-myeloma activity by targeting plasmocytoid dendritic cells, osteoclastogenesis and cancer stem-like cells. 2017;31:2652–2660. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.135. [PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Htut M., Gasparetto C., Zonder J., Matin T.G., III, Scott E.C., Chen J., Shemesh S., Brooks C.L., Chauhan D., Anderson K.C., et al. Results from ongoing phase 1/2 trial of SL-401 in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. 2016;128:5696. [Google Scholar]
74. Sridharan A., Scinke CD., Georgiev S., Da Saloma Ferreira M., Thiruthoanathan V., MacArthur I., Bhagat TD., Choudhory DS., Alini S., Chen S., et al. Stem cell mutations can be detected in myeloma patients years before secondary leukemia. Blood Adv 2019; 3: 3962-3967
75. Lashjo T., Finke C., Kimlingen T.K., Zblewski D., Chen D., Patnaik D., Hauson C.A., Brooks C., Tefferi A., Pardanani A. Expression of CD123 (IL-3R alpha), a therapeutic target of SL-401, on myeloproliferative neoplasms. 2014;124:5577.[Google Scholar]
76. Patnaik M.M., Gupta V., Gotlib J.R., Carraway H.E., Wadleigh M., Schiller G.J., Talpaz M., Arana-Yi C., McCloskey J., Lee S., et al. Results from ongoing phase 2 trial of SL-401 in patients with advanced, high-risk myeloproliferative neoplasms including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. 2016;128:4245. [Google Scholar]
77. Patnaik M.M., Ali H., Gupta V., Schiller G.J., Lee S., Yacoub A., Talpaz M., Sardone M., Wysowskyj H., Shemesh S., et al. Results from ongoing phase 1/2 clinical trial of tagraxopusp (SL-401) in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) 2018;132:1821. [Google Scholar]
78. Pemmaraju N., Gupta V., Schiller G., Lee S., Yacoub A., Ali H., Talpaz M., Sardone M., Wysowskyj H., Shemesh S., et al. Results from ongoing phase 1/2 clinical trial of tagraxofusp (SL-401) in patients with intermediate or high risk relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis. 2018;132:1771. doi: 10.1097/01.HS9.0000560956.60646.c2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Lucas N., Duchmann M., Rameau P., Noel F., Michea P., Saada V., Kosmider O., Pierron G., Fernandez-Zapico M.E., Howard M.T., et al. Biology and prognostic impact of clonal plasmocytoid dendritic cells in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0447-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Frolova O., Berrito G., Brooks C., Wang R.Y., Korchin B., Rowinsky E.K., Cortes J., Kantarjian H., Andreef M., Frankel A.E., et al. SL-401 and SL-501, targeted therapeutics directed at the interleukin-3 receptor, inhibit the growth of leukemic cells and stem cells in advanced chronic myeloid leukemia.  J. Haematol. 2014;166:862–874. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12978. [PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Han L., Jorgensen J.L., Brooks C., Shi C., Zhang Q., Nogueras Gonzalez G.M., Cavazos A., Pan R., Mu H., Wang S.A., et al. Antileukemia efficacy and mechanisms of action of SL-101, a novel anti-CD123 antibody conjugate, in acute myeloid leukemia.  Cancer Res. 2017;23:3385–3395. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1904. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Sun Q., Woodcock J.M., Rapoport A., Stomski F.C., Korpelainen E.I., El Bagley C.J., Goodall G.J., Smith W.B., Gamble J.R., Vadas M.A., et al. Monoclonal antobody 7G3 recognizes the N-terminal domain of the human interleukin-3 (IL-3) receptor alpha-chain and functions as a specific receptor antagonist. 1996;87:1183–1192.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Jin L., Lee E.M., Ramshaw H.S., Busfield S.J., Peoppl A.G., Wilkinson L., Guthridge M.A., Thomas D., Barry E.F., Boyd A., et al. Monoclonal-antibody mediated targeting of CD123, IL-3 receptor alpha chain, eliminates human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Busfield S., Brodo M., Wong M., Ramshaw H., Lee E.M., Martin K., Ghosh S., Braley H., Tomasetig V., Panousis C., et al. CSL362: A monoclonal antibody to human interleukin 3 receptor (CD123), optimized for NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity of AML stem cells. 2012;120:3598. [Google Scholar]
85. Herzog F., Busfield S., Biondo M., Vairo G., DeWitte M., Pragst I., Dickneite G., Nash A., Zollner S. Pharmacodynamic activity and preclinical safety of CSL362, a novel humanized, affinity-matured monoclonal antibody against human interleukin 3 receptor. 2012;120:1524. [Google Scholar]
86. Lee E.M., Yee D., Busfield S., Vairo G., Lock R. A neutralizing antibody (CSL362) against the interleukin-3 receptor alpha with CSL362 augments the efficacy of a cytabarine/daunorubicin induction-type therapy in preclinical xenograft models of acute myelogenous leukemia. 2012;120:3599. [Google Scholar]
87. Nievergall E., Ramshaw H.S., Yong A., Biondo M., Busfield S.J., Vairo G., Lopez A.F., Hughes T.P., White D.L., Hiwase D.K. Monoclonal antobody targeting IL-3 receptor alpha with CSL 362 effectively depletes CML progenitor and stem cells. 2014;123:1218–1228. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-475194. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Busfield S.J., Biondo M., Wong M., Ramshaw H.S., Lee E.M., Ghosh S., Braley H., Panousis C., Roberts A.W., He S.Z., et al. Targeting of acute myeloid leukemia in vitro and in vivo with an anti-CD123 mAb engineered for optimal ADCC. 2014;28:2213–2221. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.128. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Broughton S.E., Hercus T.R., Hardy M.P., McClure B.J., Nero T.L., Dottore M., Hujnh H., Braley H., Barry E.F., Kan W.L., et al. Dual mechanism of interleukin-3 receptor blockade by anti-cancer antibody. Cell Rep. 2014;8:410–419. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.038. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
90. Lee E.M., Yee D., Busfield S.J., McManus J.F., Cummings N., Vairo G., Wei A., Ramshaw H.S., Powell J.A., Lopez A.F., et al. Efficacy of an Fc-modified anti-CD123 antibody CSL362 combined with chemotherapy in xenograft models of acute myelogenous leukemia in immunodeficient mice. 2015;100:914–926. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.113092. [PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Xie L.H., Biondo M., Busfield S.J., Arruda A., Yang X., Vairo G., Minden M.D. CD123 target validation and preclinical evaluation of ADCC activity of anti-CD123 antibody CSL362 in combination with NKs from AML patients in remission. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:e567. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. He S.Z., Busfield S., Ritchie D.S., Hertzberg M.S., Durront S., Lewis I.D., Marlton P., McLachlan A.J., Kerridge I., Bradstock K.F., et al. A phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-leukemic activity of the anti-CD123 monoclonal antibody CSL360 in relapsed, refractory or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.  Lymphoma. 2015;56:1406–1415. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.956316. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Douglas-Smith B., Roboz G.L., Walter R.B., Altman J.K., Ferguson A., Curcio T.J., Orlowski K.F., Garrett L., Busfield S.J., Baruden M., et al. First in man, phase I study of CSL362 (anti-IL3Rα/CD123) monoclonal antibody in patients with CD123⁺acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission at high risk for early relapse.  2014;124:abst. 120. [Google Scholar]
94. Smith D., Roberts A.W., Raboz G.L., DeWitrte M., Ferguson A., Garrett L., Curcio T., Orlowski K.F., Dasen S., Beusen-Kennedy D.M., et al. Minimal residual disease (MRD) as exploratory endpoint in a phase I study of the anti-CD123 mAb CSL362 given as post-remission therapy in adult myeloid leukemia. 2015;126:3819.[Google Scholar]
95. Platzebecker L., Gotze K., Kronke J., Delschlagel U., Schultze F., Sockel K., Middeke J.M., Chermat F., Gloaquen S., Puttrich M., et al. Single agent Talocutuzumab in elderly high-risk MDS or AML patients failing hypomethylating agents–results of the SAMBA study by the EMSCO network. EHA Learning Center. 2019;16:215549.[Google Scholar]
96. Kubasch A.S., Schulze F., Gotze K.S., Kronke J., Sockel K., Midesteke J.M., Chermat F., Gloaguen S., Puttnich M., Weigt C., et al. Anti-CD123 targeted therapy with Talacotuzumab in advanced MDS and AML after failing hypomethylating agents-final results of the Samba trial. 2018;132:4045. [Google Scholar]
97. Ernst D., Williams B.A., Wang X.H., Yoon N., Kim K.P., Chu J., Luo Z.J., Hermans K.G., Krueger J., Keating A. Humanized anti-CD123 antibody facilitates NK cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of Hodgkin lymphoma targets via ARF6/PLD-1. Blood Cancer J. 2019;9:6. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0168-2.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Kovtun Y., Jones G.E., Adamns S., Harvey L., Audette C.A., Wihelm A., Bai C., Rui L., Lelan R., Liu F., et al. A CD123 targeting antibody-drug conjugate, IMGN632, designed to eradicate AML while sparing normal bone marrow cells. Blood Adv. 2018;2:848–858. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017517. [PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Evanns K., El-Zein N., Jones C., Erickson S.W., Guo Y., Teichjer B.A., Adams S., Zweilder-McKay P.A., Smith M.A., Lock R.B. Abstract 4820: Pediatric preclinical testing consortium evaluation of the CD123 antibody drug conjugate, IMGN632, against xenograft models of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2019;79 doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-4820. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Zhang Q., Cai T., Han L., Kuruvilla V.M., Adams S., Callum S.M., Harutyunyan K., Lane A.A., Kotun Y., Daver N.G., et al. Pre-clinical efficacy of CD123-tergeting antibody-drug conjugate IMGN632 in blastic plasmocytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) models. 2018;132:abst. 3956. [Google Scholar]
101. Fritz C., Portywood S.M., Adams J., Cronin T., Lutgen-Dunckley L., Martery B.L., Sloss C.M., Watkins K., Kovtun Y., Adams S., et al. Synergistic anti-leukemic activity of PARP inhibition combined with IMGN632, an anti-CD123 antibody-drug conjugate in acute myeloid leukemia models. 2018;132:2647. [Google Scholar]
102. Daver N.G., Erba H.P., Papadantonakis N., De Angelo D.J., Wang E.S., Konopleva M., Sloss C.M., Culm-Merdek K., Zweilder-Mckay P.A., Kantarjian H.M. A phase I, First-in-human study evaluating the safety and preliminary antileukemia activity of IMGN632, a novel CD123-tergeting antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and other CD123-positive hematologic malignancies. 2018;132:abst. 27.[Google Scholar]
103. Adams S., Zhang Q.I., McCarthy R., Flaherty L.J., Kuruvilla V.M., Watkins K., Sloss C.M., Romanelli A., Zweilder-McCay P.A., Konopleva M. The combination of IMGN362, a CD123 targeting-ADC, with venetoclax augments anti-leukemic activity in vitro and prolongs survival in vivo in preclinic al models of human AML. 2019;3:e53. doi: 10.1097/01.HS9.0000559020.72361.fa.[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
104. Kuruvilla VM., Zhang Q., Daver N., Walkiny K., Sloos CM., Zweiller-McKay PA., Romanelli A., Konopleva M. Combining IMGN632, a novel CD123-targeting antibody drug conjugate with azacytidine and venetoclax facilitates apoptosis in vitro and prolongs survival in vivo in AML models. Blood 2020; 136, suppl.1: 32-33.
105. Kuo S.R., Wong L., Liu J.S. Engineering of a CD123xCD3 bispecific scFv immunofusion for the treatment of leukemia and elimination of leukemia stem cells. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2012;25:561–569. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzs040. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. Hussaini M., Rickey J., Retting M.P., Eissenberg L., Uy G., Chichili G., Moore P.A., Johnson S., Collins R., Bonvini E., et al. Targeting CD123 in leukemic stem cells using dual affinity re-targeting molecules (DARTs) 2013;122:360. [Google Scholar]
107. Chicili G.R., Huang L., Li H., Burke S., He L., Thang Q., Jin L., Gorlatov S., Ciccarone V., Chen F., et al. A CD3xCD123 bispecific DART for redirecting host T cells to myelogenous leukemia: Preclinical activity and safety in nonhuman primates.  Transl. Med. 2015;7:289ra82. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa5693. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. Al-Hussaini M., Rettig M.P., Ritchey J.K., Korpova D., Uy G.L., Eissenberg L.G., Gao F., Eades W.C., Bonvini E., Chichili G.R., et al. Targeting CD123 in acute myeloid leukemia using a T-cell directed dual affinity retargeting platform. 2016;127:122–131. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-575704. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
109. Uy G.L., Rettig M.P., Vey N., Godwin J., Foster M.C., Rizzieri D.A., Arellano M.L., Topp M.S., Huls G., Jongen-Lavrencic M., et al. Phase 1 cohort expansion of Flotetuzumab, a CD123xCD3 bispecific DART protein in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 2018;132:abst. 764. [Google Scholar]
110. Vadakekolathu J., Patel T., Reeder S., Schrarschmidt H., Schmitz M., Bornhauser M., Warren S.E., Hood T., Donaher P., Cesano A., et al. Immune gene expression profiling in children and adults with acute myeloid leukemia identifies distinct phenotypic patterns. 2017;130:3942. [Google Scholar]
111. Rutella S., Church S.E., Vadakekolathu J., Viboch E., Sullivan A.H., Hood T., Warrem S.E., Cesano A., La Motte-Mohs R., Muth J., et al. Adaptive immune gene signatures correlate with response to Flotetuzumab, a CD123xCD3 bispecific DART molecule, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. 2018;132:e444. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-111539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
112. Jacobs K., Viero C., Godwin J., Baughman J., Sun J., Ying K., Muth J., Hong S., Vey N., Sweet K.L., et al. Management of cytokine release syndrome in AML patients treated with Flotetuzumab, a CD123xCD3 bispecific DART molecule for T-cell redirected therapy. 2018;132:2738. [Google Scholar]
113. Bonivini E., La Motte-Mohs R., Huang L., Lang C.Y., Kaufman T., Liu L., Alderson R.F., Stahl K., Brown J.G., Li H., et al. A next-generation Fc-bearing CD3-engaging bispecific DART platform with extended pharmacokinetic and expanded pharmacologic window: Characterization as CD123xCD3 and CD19xCD3 DART molecules. 2018;132:5230. [Google Scholar]
114. Vadakekolathu J., Minden MD., Hood T., Church SE., UUbach EJ., Patel T., Ibrahimova N.; et al. Immune landscapes predict chemotherapy resistance and immunotherapy response in acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Trans Med 2020; 12: eaaz046.
115. Vadakekolathu J., Lai C., Reeder S., Cherech SE., Hood T., Lourdusamy A., Rettig MP., Aldoss I., Advani AS., Godwin J., et al. TP53 abnormalities correlate with immune infiltration and associate with with response to flotezumab immunotherapy in AML. Blood Adv 2020; 4: 5011-5024.
116. Uy GL., Aldoss I., Foster MC., Sayre. PH., Weiduwilt MJ., Advani AS., Godwing JE., Arellano ML., Sweet KL., Emadi A., et al. Flotezumab as salvage immunotherapy for refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2021; 137: 751-762.
117. Ravandi F., Baskey A., Foran J.M., Stock W., Mawad R., Blum W., Saville W., Johnson C.M., Vanasse G.J., Ly T., et al. Complete responses in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients on a weekly dosing schedule of XmAb 14045, a CD123xCD3 T cell-engaging bispecific antibody: Initial results of a phase 1 study. 2018;132:e763. [Google Scholar]
118. Braciak T.A., Roskopf C.C., Wildenhain S., Fenn N.C., Schiller C.B., Schubert I.A., Jacob U., Honegger A., Krupka C., Subklewe M., et al. Dual-targeting triplebody 33-16-123 (SPM-2) mediates effective redirected lysis of primary blasts from patients with a broad range of AML subtypes in combination with natural killer cells. 2018;7:e1472195. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1472195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
119. Hoffmann S., Schubert M.L., Wang L., He B., Neuber B., Dreger P., Muller-Tidow C., Schmitt M. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)  Clin. Med. 2019;8:200. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
120. June C.H., O’Conner R.S., Kawalekar O.U. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. 2018;359:1361–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6711. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
121. Maude S.L., Laetsch T.W., Buechner J. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia.  Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:439–448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
122. Cummins K.D., Gill S. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: How close to reality? 2019;104:1302–1309. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.208751.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
123. Tettamanti S., Marin V., Pizzitola I., Magnani C., Giordano Attianese G.M., Cribioli E., Maltese F., Galimberti S., Lopez A.F., Biondi A., et al. Targeting of acute myeloid leukemia by cytokine-induced killer cells redirected with a novel CD123-specific chimeric antigen receptor.  J. Haematol. 2013;161:389–401. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12282. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
124. Pizzitola I., Anjos-Alfonso F., Rouault-Pierre K., Lassailly F., Tettamanti S., Spinelli O., Biondi A., Biagi E., Bonnet D. Chimeric antigen receptors against CD33/CD123 antigens efficiently target primary acute myeloid leukemia cells in vivo. 2014;28:1596–1605. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.62. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
125. Mardiros A., Dos Santos C., McDonald T., Brown C.E., Wangh X., Budde L.E., Hofman L., Aguilar B., Chang W.C., Bretzlaff W., et al. T cells expressing CD123-specific cytolytic effector functions and anti-tumor effects against human acute myeloid leukemia. 2013;122:3138–3148. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-474056.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
126. Gill S., Tasian S.K., Ruella M., Shestova D., Li Y., Porter D.L., Carroll M., Danet-Desnoyeers G., Scholler J., Grupp S.A., et al. Preclinical targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia and myeloablation using chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. 2014;123:2343–2354. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-529537.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
127. Jacoby E., Shahani S.A., Shah N.N. Updates on CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell malignancies.  Rev. 2019;290:39–59. doi: 10.1111/imr.12774. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
128. Ruella M., Barrett D.M., Kenderian S.S., Shestova O., Hofmann T.J., Perazzelli J., Klimnchinsky M., Aikaewa V., Nazimuddin F., Koriowski M., et al. Dual CD19 and CD123 targeting prevents antigen-loss relapses after CD19-directed immunotherapies.  Clin. Investig. 2016;126:3814–3826. doi: 10.1172/JCI87366.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
129. Tasian S., Kenderian S.S., Shen F., Ruella M., Shestova O., Kozlowski M., LI Y., Schrank-Hacker A., Morrissette J., Carroll M. Optimized depletion of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in murine xenograft models of human acute myeloid leukemia. 2017;129:2395–2407. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-736041.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
130. Arcangeli S., Rotiroti M.C., Bardelli M., Simonelli L., Magnani M.F., Biondi A., Biagi E., Tettamanti S., Varani L. Balance of anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor binding affinity and density for the targeting of acute myeloid leukemia.  Ther. 2017;25:1933–1945. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.04.017. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
131. Collinson-Pantz M.R., Chang W.C., Lu A., Khalil M., Crisostomo J.W., Lin P.Y., Mahendrevada A., Shinners N.P., Brndt. M.E., Zhang M., et al. Constitutively active MyD88/CD40 costimulation enhances expansion and efficacy of chimeric antigen T cells targeting hematological malignancies. 2019;33:2195–2207. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0417-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
132. Petrov J.C., Wada M., Pinz K.G., Yan L.E., Chen K.H., Shuai X., Liu H., Chen X., Leung L.H., Salman H., et al. Compound CART-cells as a double-pronged approach for treating acute myeloid leukemia. 2018;32:1317–1326. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0075-3.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
133. Klob S., Oberschmidt O., Morgan M., Dahle J., Arseniev L., Huppert V., Granzin M., Gardlowski T., Matthies N., Solterbon S., et al. Optimization of human NK cell manufacturing: Fully automated separation, improved ex vivoexpansion using IL-21 with autologous feeder cells, and generation of anti-CD123-CAR-expressing effector cells.  Gene Ther. 2017;28:897–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134. Luo Y., Chang L.J., Hu Y., Dong L., Wei G., Huang H. First-in-manCD123-spedific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the treatment of refractory acute myeloid leukemia. 2015;126:3778. [Google Scholar]
135. Budde L.E., Song J.Y., Kim Y., Blanchard S., Wagner J., Stein A.S., Weng L., De Real M., Hernandez R., Marcucci E., et al. Remissions of acute myeloid leukemia and blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm following treatment with CD123-specific CART cells: A first-in-human clinical trial. 2017;130:811.[Google Scholar]
136. Budde L.E., Schuster S.J., Del Real M. CD123CAR displays clinical activity in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and blastic plasmocytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN): Safety and efficacy results from a phase 1 study; Proceedings of the AACR Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; Miami, FL, USA. 27–30 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
137. Cummins K.D., Frey N., Nelson A.M. Treating relapsed/refractory (RR) AML with biodegradable antiCD123 CAR modified T cells. 2017;130:1359. [Google Scholar]
138. Mu H., Ma H., Vaidya A., Bonifant C.L., Gottschalk S., Velasquez M.P., Andreef M. IL15 expressing CD123-targeted engager T-cell therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia. 2018;132:2724. [Google Scholar]
139. Loff S., Meyer J.E., Dietrich T., Spehr J., Julia R., von Bonin R., Grunder C., Franke K., Feldmann A., Bechmann M., et al. Late-stage preclinical characterization of switchable CD123-specific CAR-T for treatment of acute leukemia. 2018;132:964. [Google Scholar]
140. Wermke M., Kraus S., Ehninger A., Bargou RC., Goebeler ME., Middeke JM., Kreissig C., von Bonin M., Koedam J., Pehl M.; et al. Proof of concept for a rapid switchable universal CAR-T platform with UniCAR-T-CD123 in relapsed/refractory AML. Blood 2021; 137: 3145-3148.