Hydrogen Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Vladimír Zeleňák.

The development of hydrogen technologies and a wider use of hydrogen fuel cell systems require new materials that can store large amounts of hydrogen at relatively low pressures with small volume, low weight, and fast kinetics for recharging. Among the most challenging materials for hydrogen storage are porous coordination polymers, also called metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). MOFs are two- or three-dimensional porous crystalline materials with infinite lattices. As a result of their ultra-high surface area values (more than 2500 m2·g–1 measured by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) approach), they were found to be promising gas adsorbers for small gaseous molecules, including CH4, CHCl3, CCl4, C6H6, C6H12, CO2, Ar, N2, and H2. The main benefit of MOFs is their reversible and high-rate hydrogen adsorption process. A reasonable number of H2 molecules inside the body of MOFs may only be obtained at very low temperatures. To date, MOFs have shown significant progress in applications of gas separation, catalysis, and coordination chemistry.

  • adsorption
  • hydrogen
  • MOF
  • nanoconfinement
  • metal hydrides
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. [1] Germain, J.; Frechet, J. M. J.; Svec, F. Nanoporous Polymers for Hydrogen Storage. Small 2009, 5, 1098–1111.
  2. [2] Li, H.; Eddaoudi, M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 1999, 402, 276–279.
  3. [3] Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A. V.; Olivier, J. P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. S. W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069.
  4. [4] Panella, B.; Hirscher, M.; Pütter, H.; Müller, U. Hydrogen adsorption in metal-organic frameworks: Cu-MOFs and Zn-MOFs compared. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 520–524.
  5. [5] Rosi, N. L.; Eckert, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Vodak, D. T.; Kim, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 2003, 300, 1127–1129.
  6. [6] Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J.; Rosi, N.; Vodak, D.; Wachter, J.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science 2002, 295, 469–472.
  7. [7] Ahmed, A.; Liu, Y.; Purewal, J.; Tran, L. D.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Veenstra, M.; Matzger, A. J.; Siegel, D. J. Balancing gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen density in MOFs. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 2459–2471.
  8. [8] Ahmed, A.; Seth, S.; Purewal, J.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Veenstra, M.; Matzger, A. J.; Siegel, D. J. Exceptional hydrogen storage achieved by screening nearly half a million metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1568.
  9. [9] Chen, Z.; Li, P.; Anderson, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Robison, L.; Redfern, L. R.; Moribe, S.; Islamoglu, T.; Gómez-Gualdrón, D. A.; Yildirim, T.; Stoddart, J. F.; Farha, O.K. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 2020, 368, 297–303.
  10. [10] Suh, M. P.; Park, H. J.; Prasad, T. K.; Lim, D.-W. Hydrogen Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 782–835.
  11. [11] Furukawa, H.; Miller, M. A.; Yaghi, O. M. Independent verification of the saturation hydrogen uptake in MOF-177 and establishment of a benchmark for hydrogen adsorption in metal–organic frameworks. J.Mater.Chem. 2007, 17, 3197–3204.
  12. [12] Chavan, S.; Vitillo, J. G.; Gianolio, D.; Zavorotynska, O.; Civalleri, B.; Jakobsen, S.; Nilsen, M. H.; Valenzano, L.; Lamberti, C.; Lillerud, K. P.; Bordiga, S. H2 storage in isostructural UiO-67 and UiO-66 MOFs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 1614–1626.
  13. [13] Rowsell, J. L. C.; Millward, A. R.; Park, K. S.; Yaghi, O. M. Hydrogen sorption in functionalized metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5666–5667.
  14. [14] Kaskel, S. Metal-Organic Frameworks: Design and Application; Ed. MacGillivray, L. R.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2010, 349pp.
  15. [15] Farha, O. K.; Malliakas, C. D.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Hupp, J. T. Control over catenation in metal−organic frameworks via rational design of the organic building block. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 950–952.
  16. [16] Zhou, H.-C.; Ma, S. Q.; Sun, D. F.; Ambrogio, M.; Fillinger, J. A.; Parkin, S. Framework-catenation isomerism in metal−organic frameworks and its impact on hydrogen uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1858–1859.
  17. [17] Park, H. J.; Suh, M. P. Mixed-ligand metal–organic frameworks with large pores: gas sorption properties and single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation on guest exchange. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8812–8821.
  18. [18] Liu, G.; Chernikova, V.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Shekhah , O.; Zhang, C.; Yi, S.; Eddaoudi, M.;  Koros, W. J. Mixed matrix formulations with MOF molecular sieving for key energy-intensive separations. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 283–289.
  19. [19] Lin, Z.-J.; Lü, J.; Hong, M.; Cao, R. Metal–organic frameworks based on flexible ligands (FL-MOFs): structures and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5867–5895.
  20. [20] Chang, Z.; Zhang, D.-S.; Chen, Q.; Li, R.-F.; Hu, T.-L.; Bu, X.-H. Rational construction of 3D pillared metal–organic frameworks: synthesis, structures, and hydrogen adsorption properties. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 7555–7562.
  21. [21] Montes-Andrés, H.; Leo, P.; Orcajo, G.; Rodríguez-Diéguez, A.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Martos, C.; Botas, J. Á.; Calleja, G. Synthesis, structural features, and hydrogen adsorption properties of three new flexible sulfur-containing metal–organic frameworks. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 6707–6714.
  22. [22] Bhatia, S. K.; Myers, A. L. Optimum Conditions for Adsorptive Storage. Langmuir 2006, 22, 1688–1700.
  23. [23] Bae, Y.-S.; Snurr, R. Q. Optimal isosteric heat of adsorption for hydrogen storage and delivery using metal–organic frameworks. Microp. Mesopor. Mater. 2010, 132, 300–303.
  24. [24] Deiters, E.; Bulach, V.; Hosseini, M. W. Reversible single-crystal-to-single-crystal guest exchange in a 3-D coordination network based on a zinc porphyrin. Chem. Commun. 2005, 31, 3906–3908.
  25. [25] Dinca, M.; Long, J. R. High-enthalpy hydrogen adsorption in cation-exchanged variants of the microporous metal-organic framework Mn3[(Mn4Cl)3(BTT)8(CH3OH)10]2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11172–11176.
  26. [26] Ishida, T.; Nagaoka, M.; Akita, T.; Haruta, M. Deposition of gold clusters on porous coordination polymers by solid grinding and their catalytic activity in aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8456–8460.
  27. Pan, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Guan, Y.; Wu, P. Pt nanoparticles entrapped in mesoporous metal-organic frameworks MIL-101 as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for the asymmetric hydrogenation of α-ketoesters. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 377, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khajavi, H.; Stil, H.A.; Kuipers, H.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F. Shape and transition state selective hydrogenations using egg-shell Pt-MIL-101(Cr) catalyst. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2617–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Du, W.; Chen, G.; Nie, R.; Li, Y.; Hou, Z. Highly dispersed Pt in MIL-101: An efficient catalyst for the hydrogenation of nitroarenes. Catal. Commun. 2013, 41, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yadav, M.; Xu, Q. Catalytic chromium reduction using formic acid and metal nanoparticles immobilized in a metal-organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3327–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Singh, A.K.; Xu, Q. Metal-organic framework supported bimetallic Ni–Pt nanoparticles as high-performance catalysts for hydrogen generation from hydrazine in aqueous solution. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 3000–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chun, H.; Jung, H.; Koo, G.; Jeong, H.; Kim, D.-K. Efficient hydrogen sorption in 8-connected MOFs based on trinuclear pinwheel motifs. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5355–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Singh, A.K.; Xu, Q. Metal-organic framework supported bimetallic Ni–Pt nanoparticles as high-performance catalysts for hydrogen generation from hydrazine in aqueous solution. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 3000–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chun, H.; Jung, H.; Koo, G.; Jeong, H.; Kim, D.-K. Efficient hydrogen sorption in 8-connected MOFs based on trinuclear pinwheel motifs. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5355–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback