The Natterin Proteins Diversity: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Conner Chen and Version 2 by Conner Chen.

The Natterin proteins were first revealed in the venom of the medically significant Brazilian toadfish Thalassophryne nattereri (VTn) in five orthologs named Natterin (1–4, and -P). They were identified as being responsible for the main toxic non-lethal effects of the VTn, such as local edema and excruciating pain, that evolved to necrosis. Following the first identification, the group of Natterin-like proteins has been expanded over time. Several sequences homologous to Natterin have been identified in different teleostean genomes, such as the venomous catfish Plotosus lineatus and non-venomous fish, including lampreys-Lampetra japonica or Lethenteron camtschaticum and Lampetra morii, arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus, zebrafish Danio rerio, atlantic cod Gadus morhua, and ovate pompano Trachinotus ovatus.

  • Thalassophryne nattereri
  • Natterin
  • aerolysin
  • protein evolution
  • immune function
  • bioinformatics
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bryant, S.H. CD-Search: Protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W327–W331.
  2. Von Reumont, B.M.; Undheim, E.A.B.; Jauss, R.T.; Jenner, R.A. Venomics of remipede crustaceans reveals novel peptide diversity and illuminates the venom’s biological role. Toxins 2017, 9, 234.
  3. Drukewitz, S.H.; Bokelmann, L.; Undheim, E.A.B.; von Reumont, B.M. Toxins from scratch? Diverse, multimodal gene origins in the predatory robber fly Dasypogon diadema indicate a dynamic venom evolution in dipteran insects. GigaScience 2019, 8, giz081.
  4. Walker, A.A.; Madio, B.; Jin, J.; Undheim, E.A.B.; Fry, B.G.; King, G.F. Melt with this kiss: Paralyzing and liquefying venom of the assassin bug Pristhesancus plagipennis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2017, 16, 552–566.
  5. Özbek, R.; Wielsch, N.; Vogel, H.; Lochnit, G.; Foerster, F.; Vilcinskas, A.; von Reumont, B.M. Proteo-transcriptomic characterization of the venom from the endoparasitoid wasp Pimpla turionellae with aspects on its biology and evolution. Toxins 2019, 11, 721.
  6. Fingerhut, L.C.H.W.; Strugnell, J.M.; Faou, P.; Labiaga, A.R.; Zhang, J.; Cooke, I.R. Shotgun proteomics analysis of saliva and salivary gland tissue from the common octopus Octopus vulgaris. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17, 3866–3876.
  7. Szczesny, P.; Iacovache, I.; Muszewska, A.; Ginalski, K.; van der Goot, F.G.; Grynberg, M. Extending the aerolysin family: From bacteria to vertebrates. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20349.
  8. Baum, D. Reading a Phylogenetic Tree: The Meaning of Monophyletic Groups. Nat. Educ. 2008, 1, 190.
  9. Baum, D. Trait evolution on a phylogenetic tree: Relatedness, similarity, and the myth of evolutionary advancement. Nat. Educ. 2008, 1, 191.
  10. Banks, J.A.; Nishiyama, T.; Hasebe, M.; Bowman, J.L.; Gribskov, M.; dePamphilis, C.; Albert, V.A.; Aono, N.; Aoyama, T. The Selaginella Genome Identifies Genetic Changes Associated with the Evolution of Vascular Plants. Science 2011, 332, 960–963.
  11. Nigel, E.S. How many species of insects and other terrestrial arthropods are there on earth? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 31–45.
  12. Misof, B.; Liu, S.; Meusemann, K.; Peters, R.S.; Donath, A.; Mayer, C.; Kjer, K.M.; Zhou, X. Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science 2014, 346, 763–767.
  13. Barrowclough, G.F.; Cracraft, J.; Klicka, J.; Zink, R.M. How many kinds of birds are there and why does it matter? PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166307.
  14. van de Peer, Y.; Maere, S.; Meyer, A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 725–732.
  15. Castro, R.; Tafalla, C. Overview of fish immunity. In Mucosal Health in Aquaculture; Beck, B.H., Peatman, E., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 3–54.
  16. Glasauer, S.M.K.; Neuhauss, S.C.F. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2014, 289, 1045–1060.
  17. Kuraku, S.; Meyer, A.; Kuratani, S. Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: Did cyclostomes diverge before or after? Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26, 47–59.
  18. Nelson, J.S. Fishes of the World, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  19. Srivastava, M.; Simakov, O.; Chapman, J.; Fahey, B.; Gauthier, M.E.A.; Mitros, T.; Richards, G.S.; Conaco, C.; Dacre, M.; Hellsten, U.; et al. The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature 2010, 466, 720–726.
  20. Park, E.; Hwang, D.; Lee, J.; Song, J.; Seo, T.; Won, Y. Estimation of divergence times in cnidarian evolution based on mitochondrial protein-coding genes and the fossil record. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 62, 329–345.
  21. Schendel, V.; Rash, L.D.; Jenner, R.A.; Undheim, E.A.B. The diversity of venom: The importance of behavior and venom system morphology in understanding its ecology and evolution. Toxins 2019, 11, 666.
  22. Moran, Y.; Fredman, D.; Szczesny, P.; Grynberg, M.; Technau, U. Recurrent Horizontal Transfer of Bacterial Toxin Genes to Eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29, 2223–2230.
  23. Gacesa, R.; Hung, J.Y.; Bourne, D.G.; Long, P.F. Horizontal transfer of a natterin-like toxin encoding gene within the holobiont of the reef building coral Acropora digitifera (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia) and across multiple animal lineages. J. Venom Res. 2020, 10, 7–12.
  24. Undheim, E.; Jenner, R.A. Phylogenetic analyses suggest centipede venom arsenals were repeatedly stocked by horizontal gene transfer. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 818.
  25. Hejnol, A.; Obst, M.; Stamatakis, A.; Ott, M.; Rouse, G.W.; Edgecombe, G.D. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 4261–4270.
  26. Shimeld, S.M.; Donoghue, P.C.J. Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: Cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish). Development 2012, 139, 2091–2099.
  27. Spencer, V.; Venza, Z.N.; Harrison, C.J. What can lycophytes teach us about plant evolution and development? Modern perspectives on an ancient lineage. Evol. Dev. 2020, 9, e12350.
  28. Friedman, M.; Coates, M.I.; Anderson, P. First discovery of a primitive coelacanth fin fills a major gap in the evolution of lobed fins and limbs. Evol. Dev. 2007, 9, 329–337.
  29. Johanson, Z.; Long, J.A.; Talent, J.A.; Janvier, P.; Warren, J.W. Oldest coelacanth, from the Early Devonian of Australia. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2, 443–446.
  30. Holder, M.T.; Erdmann, M.V.; Wilcox, T.P.; Caldwell, R.L.; Hillis, D.M. Two living species of coelacanths? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 12616–12620.
  31. Clarke, J.T.; Lloyd, G.T.; Friedman, M. Little evidence for enhanced phenotypic evolution in early teleosts relative to their living fossil sister group. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11531–11536.
  32. Harter, T.S.; Brauner, C.J. The O2 and CO2 transport system in teleosts and the specialized mechanisms that enhance Hb–O2 unloading to tissues. Fish Physiol. 2017, 36, 1–106.
  33. Witten, P.W.; Hall, B.K. Teleost skeletal plasticity: Modulation, adaptation, and remodelling. Copeia 2015, 103, 727–739.
  34. Near, T.J.; Eytan, R.I.; Dornburg, A.; Kuhn, K.L.; Moore, J.A.; Davis, M.P.; Wainwright, P.C.; Friedman, M.; Smith, W.L. Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13698–13703.
  35. Sato, Y.; Nishida, M. Teleost fish with specific genome duplication as unique models of vertebrate evolution. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2010, 88, 169–188.
  36. Braasch, I.; Bobe, J.; Guiguen, Y.; Postlethwait, J.H. Reply to: ‘Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication’. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 910–911.
  37. Cusack, B.P.; Wolfe, K.H. When gene marriages don’t work out: Divorce by subfunctionalization. Trends Genet. 2007, 23, 270–272.
  38. Rastogi, S.; Liberles, D.A. Subfunctionalization of duplicated genes as a transition state to neofunctionalization. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 14, 5–28.
  39. Sandve, S.R.; Rohlfs, R.V.; Hvidsten, T.R. Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 908–909.
  40. Weitzman, S.H. Teleost Fish Encyclopedia Britannica. 2018. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/animal/teleost (accessed on 12 April 2020).
  41. Avise, J.C.; Tatarenkov, A. Population genetics and evolution of the mangrove rivulus Kryptolebias marmoratus, the world’s only self-fertilizing hermaphrodite vertebrate. J. Fish Biol. 2015, 87, 519–538.
  42. Lampert, K.P.; Schartl, M. The origin and evolution of a unisexual hybrid: Poecilia formosa. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2008, 363, 2901–2909.
  43. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. FishBase 2000: Concepts, Design and Data Sources; ICLARM: Los Baños, Philippines, 2000; p. 344.
  44. Wright, J.J. Evolutionary History of Venom Glands in the Siluriformes. Evol. Venom. Anim. Their Toxins 2015, 1–19.
  45. Fróes, H.P. Sur un poisson toxiphore brésilien: Le “niquim” Thalassophyne maculosa. Rev. Sudam. Med. Cirurugia 1932, 3, 871–878.
  46. Fróes, H.P. Studies on venomous fishes of tropical countries. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1933, 36, 134–135.
  47. Lopes-Ferreira, M.; Grund, L.Z.; Lima, C. Thalassophryne nattereri fish venom: From the envenoming to the understanding of the immune system. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 20, 1–12.
  48. Chowdhury, B.; Garai, G. A review on multiple sequence alignment from the perspective of genetic algorithm. Genomics 2017, 109, 419–431.
  49. Chatzou, M.; Magis, C.; Chang, J.M.; Kemena, C.; Bussotti, G.; Erb, I.; Notredame, C. Multiple sequence alignment modeling: Methods and applications. Brief. Bioinform. 2016, 17, 1009–1023.
  50. Postlethwait, J.H.; Woods, I.G.; Ngo-Hazelett, P.; Yan, Y.L.; Kelly, P.D.; Chu, F.; Huang, H.; Hill-Force, A.; Talbot, W.S. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 1890–1902.
  51. Force, A.; Lynch, M.; Pickett, F.B.; Amores, A.; Yan, Y.L.; Postlethwait, J. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 1999, 151, 1531–1545.
  52. MacCarthy, T.; Bergman, A. The limits of subfunctionalization. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 213.
  53. Shapovalov, M.; Vucetic, S.; Dunbrack, R.L., Jr. A new clustering and nomenclature for beta turns derived from high-resolution protein structures. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2019, 15, e1006844.
  54. Cirauqui, N.; Abriata, L.A.; van der Goot, F.G.; Dal Peraro, M. Structural, physicochemical and dynamic features conserved within the aerolysin pore-forming toxin family. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13932.
  55. Akiba, T.; Abe, Y.; Kitada, S.; Kusaka, Y.; Ito, A.; Ichimatsu, T.; Katayama, H.; Akao, T.; Higuchi, K.; Mizuki, E.; et al. Crystal structure of the parasporin-2 Bacillus thuringiensis toxin that recognizes cancer cells. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386, 121–133.
  56. Cole, A.R.; Gibert, M.; Popoff, M.; Moss, D.S.; Titball, R.W.; Basak, A.K. Clostridium perfringens epsilon-toxin shows structural similarity to the pore-forming toxin aerolysin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 797–798.
  57. Degiacomi, M.T.; Iacovache, I.; Pernot, L.; Chami, M.; Kudryashev, M.; Stahlberg, H.; van der Goot, F.G.; Dal Peraro, M. Molecular assembly of the aerolysin pore reveals a swirling membrane-insertion mechanism. Nat. Chem. Biol 2013, 9, 623–629.
  58. Deane, C.M.; Allen, F.H.; Taylor, R.; Blundell, T.L. Carbonyl-carbonyl interactions stabilize the partially allowed Ramachandran conformations of asparagine and aspartic acid. Protein Eng. 1999, 12, 1025–1028.
  59. Mayorov, A.; Dal Peraro, M.; Abriata, L.A. Active site-induced evolutionary constraints follow fold polarity principles in soluble globular enzymes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 1728–1733.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Feedback