Challenges for Nanotechnology: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Vicky Zhou and Version 1 by Johann Köhler.

The term “Nanotechnology” describes a large field of scientific and technical activities dealing with objects and technical components with small dimensions. Typically, bodies that are in–at least–two dimensions smaller than 0.1 µm are regarded as “nanobjects”. By this definition, a lot of advanced materials, as well as the advanced electronic devices, are objects of nanotechnology. In addition, many aspects of molecular biotechnology as well as macromolecular and supermolecular chemistry and nanoparticle techniques are summarized under “nanotechnology”. Despite this size-oriented definition, nanotechnology is dealing with physics and chemistry as well as with the realization of technical functions in the area between very small bodies and single particles and molecules. This includes the shift from classical physics into the quantum world of small molecules and low numbers or single elementary particles. Besides the already established fields of nanotechnology, there is a big expectation about technical progress and solution to essential economic, medical, and ecological problems by means of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology can only meet these expectations if fundamental progress behind the recent state of the art can be achieved. Therefore, very important challenges for nanotechnology are discussed here.

  • limits of nanotechnology
  • nanofacility shrinking
  • modularity
  • sustainability
  • hierarchical organiza-tion
  • entropy export
  • time scales
  • life cycles
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Feynman, R.P. There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Eng. Sci. 1960, 23, 22–36.
  2. Köhler, M.; Fritzsche, W. Nanotechnology. An Introduction to Nanostructuring Techniques; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007; pp. 1–11.
  3. Vollath, D. Nanomaterials. In An Introduction to Synthesis, Characterization and Processing; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008.
  4. Madou, M. Fundamentals of Microfabrication; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997.
  5. Li, L.; Liu, X.; Pal, S.; Wang, S.L.; Ober, C.K.; Giannelis, E.P. Extreme ultraviolet resist material for sub-7-nm patterning. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4855–4866.
  6. Drexler, K.E. Nanosystems; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  7. Lindsey, S. Self-assembly in synthetic routes to molecular devices. Biological principles and chemical perspectives: A review. New J. Chem. 1991, 15, 153–180.
  8. Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Venturi, M. Molecular Devices and Machines. A Journey into the Nanoworld; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
  9. Genovese, A.; Acquaye, A.A.; Figueroa, A.; Koh, S.C.L. Sustainable supply chain management ant the transition towards a circular economy; evidence and some applications. Omega Int. J. Manag. Sci. 2017, 66, 344–357.
  10. Köhler, J.M. The ecological time scale violation by industrial society and the chemical challenes for transition to a sustainable global entropy export management. Green Process. Synth. 2014, 3, 33–45.
  11. Nizetic, S.; Djilali, N.; Papadopoulos, A.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 565–591.
  12. Lieber, C.M. Nanoscale science and technology: Building a big future from small things. MRS Bull. 2003, 28, 486–491.
  13. Gopfrich, K.; Platzmann, I.; Spatz, J.P. Mastering complexity: Towards bottom-up construction of multifunctional eukaryotic synthetic cells. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 938–951.
  14. Tasbas, M.N.; Sahin, E.; Erbas-Cakmak, S. Bio-inspired molecular machines and their biological applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 443, 214039.
  15. Seeman, N.C.; Belcher, A.M. Building nanostructures from the bottom up. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6451–6455.
  16. Han, D.; Qi, X.; Myhrvold, C.; Wang, B.; Dai, M.; Jiang, S.; Bates, M.; Liu, Y.; An, B.; Zhang, F.; et al. Single-stranded DNA and RNA origami. Science 2017, 358, eaa02648.
  17. Glasscock, C.J.; Lucks, J.B.; DeLisa, M.P. Engineered protein machines: Emergent tools for synthetic biology. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 45–56.
  18. Ellis, T.; Adie, T.; Baldwin, G.S. DNA assembly for synthetic biology: From parts to pathways and beyond. Integr. Biol. 2011, 3, 109–118.
  19. Dumelin, C.E.; Scheuermann, J.; Melkko, S.; Neri, D. DNA-encoded chemical libraries. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 126, 568–581.
  20. Neri, D.; Lerner, R.A. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: A selection system based on endowing organic compounds with amplifiable information. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2018, 87, 479–502.
  21. Quan, J.Y.; Tian, J.D. Circular polymerase extension cloning for high-throughput cloning of complex and combinatorial DNA libraries. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 242–251.
  22. Stratmann, S.A. DNA replication at the single-molecule level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1201–1220.
  23. Badi, N.; Lutz, J.F. Sequence control in polymer synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 12, 3383–3390.
  24. Köhler, J.M. What proteins teaching us on fundamental strategies for molecular nanotechnology? Nanotechnol. Rev. 2015, 4, 145–160.
  25. Schmidt, H.W.; Wurther, F. A periodic system of supramolecular elements. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 8766–8775.
  26. Yildiz, C.; Semerciöz, A.S.; Yalçınkaya, B.H.; Ipek, T.D.; Ozturk-Isik, E.; Özilgen, M. Entropy generation and accumulation in biological systems. Int. J. Exergy 2020, 33, 444–468.
  27. Lagzi, I. Chemical robots—Chemotactic drug carriers. Centr. Eur. J. Med. 2013, 8, 377–382.
  28. Martens, S.; Landuyt, A.; Espeel, P.; Devreese, B.; DuPrez, F. Multifunctional sequence-defined macromolecules for chemical data storage. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4451.
More
ScholarVision Creations