Escherichia coli Shiga Toxins: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Vicky Zhou and Version 1 by Moo-Seung Lee.

Escherichia coli (EHEC) and Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1 are enterohemorrhagic bacteria that induce hemorrhagic colitis. This, in turn, may result in potentially lethal complications, such as hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, acute renal failure, and neurological abnormalities. Both species of bacteria produce Shiga toxins (Stxs), a phage-encoded exotoxin inhibiting protein synthesis in host cells that are primarily responsible for bacterial virulence.

  • Shiga toxins
  • Shiga toxin types 1 and 2
  • Shiga-toxin-producing (STEC)
  • commensal microbes
  • bacterial toxins
  • gut microbiota
  • hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS)

1. Introduction

Numerous supportive public health measures have led people to erroneously believe that epidemics of many bacterial infectious diseases are no longer a serious health risk. However, Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) still poses a threat to public health. Shiga toxin (Stx) is prototypically synthesized by the bacterium Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1, with genetically and structurally related toxin variants produced by certain serotypes of E. coli, including enterohaemorrhagic strains of E. coli (EHEC) [1]. Bacillary dysentery due to infection by Stx-producing bacteria, characterized by acute infectious diarrhea, primarily affects children aged <5 years [2]. Endemic bacillary dysentery occurs globally, including in portions of Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent, with an estimated 2–7 per 1000 children per year requiring clinical care and 164,300 deaths per year attributable to shigellosis [3]. By contrast, STEC-associated illnesses in young children are more prevalent in developed countries, in which residents consume higher levels of beef and beef products [4][5]. Major outbreaks of diarrheal diseases caused by EHEC may be due to the ingestion of foods such as uncooked meat, unpasteurized milk, water contaminated with these bacteria, and by the contamination of foods used in the preparation of fast-food [6]. Perhaps the largest outbreak of hemorrhagic colitis was caused by an O157 infection in and around Sakai City, Japan, in 1996, which resulted in approximately 1000 hospitalizations among 7000 infected cases [7]. Many non-O157 STEC serotypes have been increasingly reported, and a massive outbreak caused by the hybrid STEC/enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) O104:H4 strain occurred in northern Germany from May to June 2011 [8]. More recently, 439 outbreaks and 5 deaths caused by EHEC-contaminated romaine lettuce were reported in multiple states of the United States in 2018 [9].
Stx-producing bacteria have received substantial attention as emergent pathogens due to the dangerous toxins they produce. These exotoxins are the principal virulence factors associated with the pathogenesis of bloody diarrheal diseases, bacillary dysentery, and hemorrhagic colitis progressing to acute renal failure in infected patients, primarily in children. This phenomenon, collectively referred to as hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), is the leading cause of pediatric acute renal failure in many countries, including countries in the European Union and the United States [10][11]. Both Stxs and the inflammatory innate immune cells activated by these toxins contribute to the pathogenesis of HUS by rendering blood vessels in the colon, kidney, and central nervous system (CNS) more sensitive to the detrimental action of Stxs. Studies in animals found that treatment with purified Stxs induces intestinal and renal epithelial and endothelial cells to express neutrophil and monocyte chemoattractants. This, in turn, induces the infiltration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) into the lamina propria and kidneys [12][13]. These findings suggest that the infiltration of inflammatory cells into sites of toxin-induced damage causes the localized expression of cytokines, which in turn facilitate vascular damage via immunopathological reactions.
Studies on Stxs-induced host signaling pathways have indicated that these toxins, which act as multifunctional bacterial proteins, promote ribotoxic stress, apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, inflammatory responses, and autophagy in host cells [14]. In addition to the toxigenic and immunopathological potential of Stxs in patients, these toxins interact with multiple cell types in vitro and are responsible for the pathogenic characteristics of HUS in animal models. Although the Stxs-mediated pathogenesis of HUS is not fully understood, comprehensive knowledge of the role of Stxs in altering the composition (also referred to as ‘dysbiosis’) of the intestinal microbiota in a host infected with EHEC compared with a healthy control must be used to help identify the host factors or the commensal microbial-derived products that exacerbate tissue damage or protect against intoxication caused by toxin-producing bacteria. Studies have evaluated the precise correlations between Stx-mediated pathogenesis and intestinal indigenous commensal microbes.

2. Effects of Probiotics on STEC and Stxs in the Gut

E. coli is mainly found in the intestinal cecum and colon of mammals and resides in the mucosal layer, from which it moves into the intestinal lumen and is excreted into the feces. Pathogenic E. coli-mediated diseases, such as food poisoning, intestinal tissue damage, and particularly bloody diarrhea in young children, are major concerns in public health and medical expense-related economic problems worldwide. More importantly, certain strains of STEC in the gut may cause severe extraintestinal or extrarenal illnesses in humans. Certain Gb3-expressing cell types in the gut, such as Paneth cells, may serve as portals for ingress of Stxs. Several epidemiological studies have shown that infection with STEC isolates expressing Stx2a is more pathogenic than infection with strains producing Stx1a or Stx1a+Stx2a [4][15][16]. Infection with strains producing Stx2a may lead to extraintestinal complications, although the cause of the latter is likely to be multi-factorial and can include the constitutive regulation of stx gene expression; antibiotic usage during the prodromal diarrheal phase, inducing the phage-mediated lytic cycle; the presence or absence of additional E. coli virulence factors; and variations in host responses to toxins, which all contribute to the outcome of infection. Moreover, stx genes are carried in the genomes of temperate phages [17][18], located in the late gene region downstream of the late promoters and upstream of the lysis cassette, highly expressed upon activation of phage-mediated lytic cycle and the toxin subunits assembled in the periplasm are secreted by the lytic cycle [19]. Therefore, antibiotics are not recommended for patients with HUS because they activate the phage-mediated lytic cycle in STEC [20] that lyses bacterial host cells to release Stxs and free phage particles that can infect other bacteria and transduce stx genes [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Given that antibiotic therapy is not indicated for these reasons, besides numerous therapeutic approaches utilizing Stxs-specific neutralizing antibodies, toxin receptor analogs, and vaccinations [27], studies have attempted to increase the population of intestinal microbiota that can inhibit STEC colonization and/or Stx expression (Table 1, Figure 3Figure 1), thereby limiting HUS development.
Figure 31. Overview for the Resistance Mechanism of gut microbiota to STEC Infection. The resistance of microbial guns to control STEC works in several ways, and the diagram shows the role of each bacterium in STEC. Bacterioides inhibit Stx production, control direct bacteria and inhibit the colonization of STEC. Bifidobacterium also inhibits STEC colonization and controls STEC proliferation through acetic acid and IgA. Lactobacillus is involved in inhibiting STEC proliferation through the production of hydrogen peroxide, lactic acid, IgA, and leukocyte activity. Pediococcus, Clostridium, and Enterobacter are involved in inhibiting STEC proliferation or controlling Stx production.
Table 1. Abilities of probiotics to regulate Stx production and STEC virulence.
Effect Activity Mediator Model Intestine

In-/Out-Side
Genus Species Ref
Inhibition Inhibit growth of E. coli O157:H7 Butyric, lactic acid Gnotobiotic mice Inside Clostridium butyricum [28]
N/D Gnotobiotic mice Inside Bacteroides fragilis [29]
N/D Gnotobiotic mice Inside Lactobacillus reuteri [30]
N/D Cattle Inside Lactobacillus acidophilus [31]
N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA) BALB/c mice

Bovine rumen
Inside Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [32]
Reuterin fluid Inside Lactobacillus reuteri [33]
Reduce autoinducer-2 (AI-2) production E. coli O157:H7 N/D Lactobacillus acidophilus [34]
Hydrogen peroxide Raw chicken meat N/D Lactobacillus lactis [35]
Lactic acid E. coli O157:H7 N/D Lactobacillus casei [36]
Decrease pH E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bifidobacterium bifidum [37]
Acetic acid BALB/c mice Inside Bifidobacterium breve [38]
Nutrition competition

(carbon, nitrogen)
Lettuce N/D Enterobacter asburiae [39]
Production of anti-Stx1 and -Stx2 IgA in the colon Infant rabbits Inside Lactobacillus casei [40]
IgA BALB/c mice Inside Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum [41]
Regulate host immunity Upregulate intestinal anti-E. coli IgA responses BALB/c and

C57BL/6 mice
Inside Lactobacillus rhamnosus [42]
Blood leukocyte activity
Inhibit translocation of E. coli O157:H7
Production of anti-Stx1 and -Stx2 IgA in the colon Infant rabbits Inside Lactobacillus casei [40]
Increase phagocytic activity BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice Outside Bifidobacterium lactis [43]
Increase production of IgA against E. coli O157:H7 BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice Inside Bifidobacterium lactis [43]
Increase production of IgG and IgM against E. coli O157:H7 BALB/c mice Outside Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum [41]
IgA BALB/c mice Inside Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum [41]
Reduce Stx production N/D Gnotobiotic mice Inside Bifidobacterium infantis [44]
N/D Gnotobiotic mice Inside Bifidobacterium longum [44]
Butyric, lactic acid Gnotobiotic mice Inside Clostridium butyricum [28]
N/D Gnotobiotic mice Inside Bacteroides fragilis [29]
Acetic acid BALB/c mice Inside Bifidobacterium breve [38]
Production of anti-Stx1 and -Stx2 IgA in the colon Infant rabbits Inside Lactobacillus casei [40]
N/D E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [45]
Uptake vitamin B12 E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [46]
Suppress kidney necrosis induced by E. coli O157:H7 N/D Gnotobiotic mice Inside Lactobacillus reuteri [30]
Repress T3SS of E. coli O157:H7 NANA and NAG E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [32]
Reduce intestinal injuries after E. coli O157:H7 infection Production of anti-Stx1 and -Stx2 IgA in the colon Infant rabbits Inside Lactobacillus casei [40]
Increased production of IgG and IgM against E. coli O157:H7 BALB/c mice Inside Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum [41]
Inhibit stx2 phage particle release N/D E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [45]
Reduce Stx2 gene expression Inhibition of phage production E. coli O153:H25 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [47]
Organic acid produced by probiotics E. coli O157:H7 N/D Pediococcus pentosaceus [48]
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
Bifidobacterium thermophilum
Reduce attaching and effacing lesions of E. coli O157:H7 Spent medium ICR mice Inside Lactobacillus acidophilus [49]
HeLa cells N/D
Hep-2 cells
S-layer protein Hep-2 cells N/D Lactobacillus helveticus [50]
T84 cells
N/D Hep-2 cells N/D Lactobacillus rhamnosus [51]
T84 cells
Enhancement Increase toxin receptor expression on host cells Butyrate E. coli O157:H7 N/D N/D N/D [52]
Enhance toxin production Bacteriophage transfer CD-1 mice Inside Escherichia coli [53]
[54]
Damage of E. coli O157:H7 DNA using DNase colicins E. coli O157:H7 N/D Escherichia coli [55]
Increase the expression of the virulence genes of E. coli O157:H7 Regulate Cra, a transcription factor for virulence genes of E. coli O157:H7 C3H/HeJ mice Inside Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [56]
Exacerbate weight loss after infection E. coli O157:H7 Inside Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [56]
Enhance colonization Butyrate E. coli O157:H7 N/D N/D N/D [52]
Secrete proteases that cleave the translocon of the T3SS E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [57]
Fucose E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [58]
Enhance T3SS of E. coli O157:H7 Secrete proteases that cleave the translocon of the T3SS E. coli O157:H7 N/D Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [57]
Increase E. coli O157:H7 motility 4-Methyl benzoic acid E. coli O157:H7 N/D N/D N/D [59]
3,4-Dimethylbenzoic acid
Hexanoic acid
Heptanoic acid

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Attempts to identify Stxs-induced risk factors in host cellular responses have revealed that these toxins have a wide range of novel properties that are associated with pathogenesis. Although studies have described Stx-induced signaling pathways that are associated with tissue damage, inflammation, and complement activation resulting from the immunopathological responses to these bacterial toxins, many details on the interfaces between STEC and commensal microbiota (Figure 3Figure 1) remain to be determined. In particular, no coherent mechanism to date has defined the targets for intervention in HUS disease progression that might explain the dynamic immune modulation, or the mediators of inflammation associated with Stxs interacting with commensal gut microbiota. Additional studies are needed to better understand the intricate pathophysiology involving Stxs-associated bacterial communities in the gut. The precise mechanism by which changes of intestinal microbiota in response to EHEC Stxs may enhance host defense or exacerbate multi-organ damage warrants further investigation. These studies may help to identify potential targets for the disruption of innate immune responses or the protection of primary organs from damage induced by Stx1a and Stx2a.

References

  1. Kaper, J.B.; O’Brien, A.D. Overview and Historical Perspectives. Microbiol Spectr. 2014, 2.
  2. Parisot, M.; Parez, N.; Boukhari, R.; Breurec, S.; Jolivet, A. Shigella infection in children under 5 years old in western French Guiana. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 146, 980–984.
  3. Kotloff, K.L.; Riddle, M.S.; Platts-Mills, J.A.; Pavlinac, P.; Zaidi, A.K.M. Shigellosis. Lancet 2018, 391, 801–812.
  4. Griffin, P.M.; Tauxe, R.V. The epidemiology of infections caused by Escherichia coli O157:H7, other enterohemorrhagic E. coli, and the associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Epidemiol. Rev. 1991, 13, 60–98.
  5. Majowicz, S.E.; Scallan, E.; Jones-Bitton, A.; Sargeant, J.M.; Stapleton, J.; Angulo, F.J.; Yeung, D.H.; Kirk, M.D. Global incidence of human Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections and deaths: A systematic review and knowledge synthesis. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 447–455.
  6. Heredia, N.; García, S. Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 250–255.
  7. Michino, H.; Araki, K.; Minami, S.; Takaya, S.; Sakai, N.; Miyazaki, M.; Ono, A.; Yanagawa, H. Massive outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in schoolchildren in Sakai City, Japan, associated with consumption of white radish sprouts. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1999, 150, 787–796.
  8. Rasko, D.A.; Webster, D.R.; Sahl, J.W.; Bashir, A.; Boisen, N.; Scheutz, F.; Paxinos, E.E.; Sebra, R.; Chin, C.S.; Iliopoulos, D.; et al. Origins of the E. coli strain causing an outbreak of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 709–717.
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  10. Scallan, E.; Mahon, B.E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Griffin, P.M. Estimates of illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths caused by major bacterial enteric pathogens in young children in the United States. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2013, 32, 217–221.
  11. European Food Safety Authority; The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05500.
  12. Lee, M.S.; Kwon, H.; Nguyen, L.T.; Lee, E.Y.; Lee, C.Y.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, M.H. Shiga Toxins Trigger the Secretion of Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase to Enhance Proinflammatory Responses. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 432–439.
  13. Jeong, Y.J.; Park, S.K.; Yoon, S.J.; Park, Y.J.; Lee, M.S. Experimental in vivo models of bacterial Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018.
  14. Lee, M.S.; Koo, S.; Jeong, D.G.; Tesh, V.L. Shiga Toxins as Multi-Functional Proteins: Induction of Host Cellular Stress Responses, Role in Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Applications. Toxins 2016, 8, 77.
  15. Melton-Celsa, A.R. Shiga Toxin (Stx) Classification, Structure, and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2, 37–53.
  16. FAO; WHO STEC Expert Group. Hazard Identification and Characterization: Criteria for Categorizing Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli on a Risk Basis(dagger). J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 7–21.
  17. Herold, S.; Karch, H.; Schmidt, H. Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages--genomes in motion. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 294, 115–121.
  18. O’Brien, A.D.; Newland, J.W.; Miller, S.F.; Holmes, R.K.; Smith, H.W.; Formal, S.B. Shiga-like toxin-converting phages from Escherichia coli strains that cause hemorrhagic colitis or infantile diarrhea. Science 1984, 226, 694–696.
  19. Wagner, P.L.; Livny, J.; Neely, M.N.; Acheson, D.W.; Friedman, D.I.; Waldor, M.K. Bacteriophage control of Shiga toxin 1 production and release by Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 44, 957–970.
  20. Tarr, P.I.; Gordon, C.A.; Chandler, W.L. Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet 2005, 365, 1073–1086.
  21. Acheson, D.W.; Reidl, J.; Zhang, X.; Keusch, G.T.; Mekalanos, J.J.; Waldor, M.K. In vivo transduction with shiga toxin 1-encoding phage. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 4496–4498.
  22. James, C.E.; Stanley, K.N.; Allison, H.E.; Flint, H.J.; Stewart, C.S.; Sharp, R.J.; Saunders, J.R.; McCarthy, A.J. Lytic and lysogenic infection of diverse Escherichia coli and Shigella strains with a verocytotoxigenic bacteriophage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4335–4337.
  23. Kratochvil, S. [Clinical experiences with hypnosis in the Czech republic (II)]. Psychiatr. Neurol. Med. Psychol. Beih 1981, 28, 46–51.
  24. Muniesa, M.; Blanco, J.E.; de Simon, M.; Serra-Moreno, R.; Blanch, A.R.; Jofre, J. Diversity of stx2 converting bacteriophages induced from Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from cattle. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2959–2971.
  25. Schmidt, H.; Bielaszewska, M.; Karch, H. Transduction of enteric Escherichia coli isolates with a derivative of Shiga toxin 2-encoding bacteriophage phi3538 isolated from Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3855–3861.
  26. Tóth, I.; Schmidt, H.; Dow, M.; Malik, A.; Oswald, E.; Nagy, B. Transduction of porcine enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with a derivative of a shiga toxin 2-encoding bacteriophage in a porcine ligated ileal loop system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 7242–7247.
  27. Mühlen, S.; Dersch, P. Treatment Strategies for Infections With Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 169.
  28. Takahashi, M.; Taguchi, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Osaki, T.; Komatsu, A.; Kamiya, S. The effect of probiotic treatment with Clostridium butyricum on enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in mice. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 41, 219–226.
  29. Saito, K.; Suzuki, R.; Koyanagi, Y.; Isogai, H.; Yoneyama, H.; Isogai, E. Inhibition of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in a gnotobiotic mouse model with pre-colonization by Bacteroides strains. Biomed. Rep. 2019, 10, 175–182.
  30. Eaton, K.A.; Honkala, A.; Auchtung, T.A.; Britton, R.A. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri ameliorates disease due to enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in germfree mice. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 185–191.
  31. Peterson, R.E.; Klopfenstein, T.J.; Erickson, G.E.; Folmer, J.; Hinkley, S.; Moxley, R.A.; Smith, D.R. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain NP51 on Escherichia coil O157:H7 fecal shedding and finishing performance in beef feedlot cattle. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 287–291.
  32. Le Bihan, G.; Sicard, J.F.; Garneau, P.; Bernalier-Donadille, A.; Gobert, A.P.; Garrivier, A.; Martin, C.; Hay, A.G.; Beaudry, F.; Harel, J.; et al. The NAG Sensor NagC Regulates LEE Gene Expression and Contributes to Gut Colonization by Escherichia coli O157:H7. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 134.
  33. Bertin, Y.; Habouzit, C.; Duniere, L.; Laurier, M.; Durand, A.; Duchez, D.; Segura, A.; Thevenot-Sergentet, D.; Baruzzi, F.; Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; et al. Lactobacillus reuteri suppresses E. coli O157:H7 in bovine ruminal fluid: Toward a pre-slaughter strategy to improve food safety? PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187229.
  34. Medellin-Pena, M.J.; Wang, H.; Johnson, R.; Anand, S.; Griffiths, M.W. Probiotics affect virulence-related gene expression in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 4259–4267.
  35. Brashears, M.M.; Reilly, S.S.; Gilliland, S.E. Antagonistic action of cells of Lactobacillus lactis toward Escherichia coli O157:H7 on refrigerated raw chicken meat. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 166–170.
  36. Ogawa, M.; Shimizu, K.; Nomoto, K.; Tanaka, R.; Hamabata, T.; Yamasaki, S.; Takeda, T.; Takeda, Y. Inhibition of in vitro growth of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 by probiotic Lactobacillus strains due to production of lactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 68, 135–140.
  37. Massa, S.; Altieri, C.; Quaranta, V.; De Pace, R. Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in yoghurt during preparation and storage at 4 degrees C. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 24, 347–350.
  38. Asahara, T.; Shimizu, K.; Nomoto, K.; Hamabata, T.; Ozawa, A.; Takeda, Y. Probiotic bifidobacteria protect mice from lethal infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2240–2247.
  39. Cooley, M.B.; Chao, D.; Mandrell, R.E. Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival and growth on lettuce is altered by the presence of epiphytic bacteria. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 2329–2335.
  40. Ogawa, M.; Shimizu, K.; Nomoto, K.; Takahashi, M.; Watanuki, M.; Tanaka, R.; Tanaka, T.; Hamabata, T.; Yamasaki, S.; Takeda, Y. Protective effect of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in infant rabbits. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 1101–1108.
  41. Gagnon, M.; Kheadr, E.E.; Dabour, N.; Richard, D.; Fliss, I. Effect of Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum probiotic feeding on enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in BALB/c mice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, 26–33.
  42. Shu, Q.; Gill, H.S. Immune protection mediated by the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20) against Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in mice. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 34, 59–64.
  43. Shu, Q.; Gill, H.S. A dietary probiotic (Bifidobacterium lactis HN019) reduces the severity of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in mice. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2001, 189, 147–152.
  44. Yoshimura, K.; Matsui, T.; Itoh, K. Prevention of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in gnotobiotic mice associated with Bifidobacterium strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2010, 97, 107–117.
  45. De Sablet, T.; Chassard, C.; Bernalier-Donadille, A.; Vareille, M.; Gobert, A.P.; Martin, C. Human microbiota-secreted factors inhibit shiga toxin synthesis by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 783–790.
  46. Cordonnier, C.; Le Bihan, G.; Emond-Rheault, J.G.; Garrivier, A.; Harel, J.; Jubelin, G. Vitamin B12 Uptake by the Gut Commensal Bacteria Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Limits the Production of Shiga Toxin by Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Toxins 2016, 8, 14.
  47. Iversen, H.; Lindbäck, T.; L’Abee-Lund, T.M.; Roos, N.; Aspholm, M.; Stenfors Arnesen, L. The gut bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron influences the virulence potential of the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O103:H25. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118140.
  48. Carey, C.M.; Kostrzynska, M.; Ojha, S.; Thompson, S. The effect of probiotics and organic acids on Shiga-toxin 2 gene expression in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Microbiol. Methods 2008, 73, 125–132.
  49. Medellin-Peña, M.J.; Griffiths, M.W. Effect of molecules secreted by Lactobacillus acidophilus strain La-5 on Escherichia coli O157:H7 colonization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1165–1172.
  50. Johnson-Henry, K.C.; Hagen, K.E.; Gordonpour, M.; Tompkins, T.A.; Sherman, P.M. Surface-layer protein extracts from Lactobacillus helveticus inhibit enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9, 356–367.
  51. Sherman, P.M.; Johnson-Henry, K.C.; Yeung, H.P.; Ngo, P.S.; Goulet, J.; Tompkins, T.A. Probiotics reduce enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7- and enteropathogenic E. coli O127:H6-induced changes in polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers by reducing bacterial adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 5183–5188.
  52. Zumbrun, S.D.; Melton-Celsa, A.R.; Smith, M.A.; Gilbreath, J.J.; Merrell, D.S.; O’Brien, A.D. Dietary choice affects Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 colonization and disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E2126–E2133.
  53. Gamage, S.D.; Strasser, J.E.; Chalk, C.L.; Weiss, A.A. Nonpathogenic Escherichia coli can contribute to the production of Shiga toxin. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 3107–3115.
  54. Gamage, S.D.; Patton, A.K.; Strasser, J.E.; Chalk, C.L.; Weiss, A.A. Commensal bacteria influence Escherichia coli O157:H7 persistence and Shiga toxin production in the mouse intestine. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 1977–1983.
  55. Toshima, H.; Yoshimura, A.; Arikawa, K.; Hidaka, A.; Ogasawara, J.; Hase, A.; Masaki, H.; Nishikawa, Y. Enhancement of Shiga toxin production in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 by DNase colicins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7582–7588.
  56. Curtis, M.M.; Hu, Z.; Klimko, C.; Narayanan, S.; Deberardinis, R.; Sperandio, V. The gut commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron exacerbates enteric infection through modification of the metabolic landscape. Cell Host Microbe 2014, 16, 759–769.
  57. Cameron, E.A.; Curtis, M.M.; Kumar, A.; Dunny, G.M.; Sperandio, V. Microbiota and Pathogen Proteases Modulate Type III Secretion Activity in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. mBio 2018, 9.
  58. Pacheco, A.R.; Curtis, M.M.; Ritchie, J.M.; Munera, D.; Waldor, M.K.; Moreira, C.G.; Sperandio, V. Fucose sensing regulates bacterial intestinal colonization. Nature 2012, 492, 113–117.
  59. Tovaglieri, A.; Sontheimer-Phelps, A.; Geirnaert, A.; Prantil-Baun, R.; Camacho, D.M.; Chou, D.B.; Jalili-Firoozinezhad, S.; de Wouters, T.; Kasendra, M.; Super, M.; et al. Species-specific enhancement of enterohemorrhagic E. coli pathogenesis mediated by microbiome metabolites. Microbiome 2019, 7, 43.
More
ScholarVision Creations