Lexical Bundles: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Shaojie Zhang.

The term “lexical bundles” was defined as “recurrent expressions, regardless of their idiomaticity, and regardless of their structural status” [1] (p. 990). As is well documented, lexical bundles not only contribute to fluent linguistic production [2] but also form essential building blocks of discourse [3]. A good command of lexical bundles could be indicative of a proficient and professional academic writer and is thus considered a pivotal skill for student writers, especially EFL student writers, for achieving sustainable growth of writing competence. Appropriate use of lexical bundles in academic writing helps writers from an academic community demonstrate their research writing ability.

The term “lexical bundles” was defined as “recurrent expressions, regardless of their idiomaticity, and regardless of their structural status”. As is well documented, lexical bundles not only contribute to fluent linguistic production but also form essential building blocks of discourse. A good command of lexical bundles could be indicative of a proficient and professional academic writer and is thus considered a pivotal skill for student writers, especially EFL student writers, for achieving sustainable growth of writing competence. Appropriate use of lexical bundles in academic writing helps writers from an academic community demonstrate their research writing ability.

  • lexical bundles
  • academic writing
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Biber, D.; Conrad, S.; Cortes, V. If you look at...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks. Appl. Linguist. 2004, 25, 371–405.
  2. Biber, D.; Johansson, S.; Leech, G.; Conrad, S.; Finegan, E. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English; Pearson Education: Harlow, UK, 1999.
  3. Hyland, K. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. Engl. Specif. Purp. 2008, 27, 4–21.
  4. Nesi, H.; Basturkmen, H. Lexical bundles and discourse signalling in academic lectures. Int. J. Corpus Linguist. 2006, 11, 283–304.
  5. Biber, D.; Barbieri, F. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. Engl. Specif. Purp. 2007, 26, 263–286.
  6. Cortes, V. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. Engl. Specif. Purp. 2004, 23, 397–423.
  7. Durrant, P. Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation in University Students’ Writing: Mapping the Territories. Appl. Linguist. 2017, 38, 165–193.
  8. Hyland, K. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. Int. J. Appl. Linguist. 2008, 18, 41–62.
  9. Omidian, T.; Shahriari, H.; Siyanova-Chanturia, A. A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2018, 36, 1–14.
  10. Abdollahpour, Z.; Gholami, J. Embodiment of rhetorical moves in lexical bundles in abstracts of the medical sciences. S. Afr. Linguist. Appl. Lang. Stud. 2019, 37, 339–360.
  11. Cortes, V. The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2013, 12, 33–43.
  12. Qi, H.; Pan, F. Lexical bundle variation across moves in abstracts of medical research articles. S. Afr. Linguist. Appl. Lang. Stud. 2020, 38, 109–128.
  13. Ädel, A.; Erman, B. Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. Engl. Specif. Purp. 2012, 31, 81–92.
  14. Chen, Y.H.; Baker, P. Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Lang. Learn. Technol. 2010, 14, 30–49.
  15. Esfandiari, R.; Barbary, F. A contrastive corpus-driven study of lexical bundles between English writers and Persian writers in psychology research articles. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2017, 29, 21–42.
  16. Pan, F.; Reppen, R.; Biber, D. Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2016, 21, 60–71.
  17. Bychkovska, T.; Lee, J.J. At the same time: Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2017, 30, 38–52.
  18. Shin, Y.K. Do native writers always have a head start over nonnative writers? The use of lexical bundles in college students’ essays. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2019, 40, 1–14.
  19. Staples, S.; Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; McClair, A. Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2013, 12, 214–225.
  20. Vo, S. Use of lexical features in non-native academic writing. J. Second Lang. Writ. 2019, 44, 1–12.
  21. Chen, Y.H.; Baker, P. Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Appl. Linguist. 2016, 37, 849–880.
  22. Römer, U. English in academia: Does nativeness matter? Anglistik Int. J. Engl. Stud. 2009, 20, 89–100.
  23. Wang, Y. As Hill seems to suggest: Variability in formulaic sequences with interpersonal functions in L1 novice and expert academic writing. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2018, 33, 12–23.
  24. Jaworska, S.; Krummes, C.; Ensslin, A. Formulaic sequences in native and non-native argumentative writing in German. Int. J. Corpus Linguist. 2015, 20, 500–525.
  25. Pan, F.; Liu, C. Comparing L1-L2 differences in lexical bundles in student and expert writing. S. Afr. Linguist. Appl. Lang. Stud. 2019, 37, 142–157.
More
ScholarVision Creations