Nanostructured Surface Finishing and Coatings: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Maria Rosaria Plutino.

Different nanostructured coatings and surface finishing, characterized by length range between 1 and 100 nm, may be deposited on the external area of a matrix to implement or enhance the materials efficiency for several applications.The use of polymers combined with nanomaterials or functional nanocarriers in drug-delivery systems finds their main application in the medical sector, in particular in cancer diagnostics and therapy and in traditional oral delivery systems. As a matter of fact, in wastewater treatment the simplest and most efficient methodology to modify the surface properties of filtering membranes, thus improving their retention and regeneration properties, involves the use of membrane coatings based on nanomaterials.

  • drug delivery systems
  • filtration membranes
  • functional coatings
  • hybrid materials
  • nanostructured systems
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. He, J.; Schoenung, J.M. Nanostructured coatings. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2002, 336, 274–319.
  2. Schuh, C.A.; Nieh, T.G. Hardness and Abrasion Resistance of Nanocrystalline Nickel Alloys near the Hall-Petch Breakdown Regime. MRS Proc. 2002, 740, 18.
  3. Tibbitt, M.W.; Dahlman, J.E.; Langer, R. Emerging Frontiers in Drug Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 704–717.
  4. Du, Y.; Chen, W.; Zheng, M.; Meng, F.; Zhong, Z. pH-sensitive degradable chimaeric polymersomes for the intracellular release of doxorubicin hydrochloride. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 7291–7299.
  5. Wagenaar, B.; Müller, B. Piroxicam release from spray-dried biodegradable microspheres. Biomaterials 1994, 15, 49–54.
  6. Badruddoza, A.Z.M.; Godfrin, P.D.; Myerson, A.S.; Trout, B.L.; Doyle, P.S. Core-Shell Composite Hydrogels for Controlled Nanocrystal Formation and Release of Hydrophobic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2016, 5, 1960–1968.
  7. Rizvi, S.A.; Saleh, A.M. Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 64–70.
  8. Oerlemans, C.; Bult, W.; Bos, M.; Storm, G.; Nijsen, J.F.W.; Hennink, W.E. Polymeric Micelles in Anticancer Therapy: Targeting, Imaging and Triggered Release. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 2569–2589.
  9. Baker, J.R. Dendrimer-based nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Hematology 2009, 1, 708–719.
  10. Rastogi, V.; Yadav, P.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Mishra, A.K.; Verma, N.; Verma, A.; Pandit, J.K. Carbon Nanotubes: An Emerging Drug Carrier for Targeting Cancer Cells. J. Drug Deliv. 2014, 2014, 1–23.
  11. Dinesh, B.; Bianco, A.; Ménard-Moyon, C. Designing multimodal carbon nanotubes by covalent multi-functionalization. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18596–18611.
  12. Murugesan, S.; Mousa, S.A.; O’Connor, L.J.; Lincoln, D.W.; Linhardt, R.J. Carbon inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor- and fibroblast growth factor-promoted angiogenesis. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 1157–1160.
  13. Zhang, Q.; Yang, W.; Man, N.; Zheng, F.; Shen, Y.; Sun, K.; Li, Y.; Wen, L.-P. Autophagy-mediated chemosensitization in cancer cells by fullerene C60 nanocrystal. Autophagy 2009, 5, 1107–1117.
  14. Prylutska, S.V.; Skivka, L.M.; Didenko, G.V.; Prylutskyy, Y.I.; Evstigneev, M.P.; Potebnya, G.P.; Panchuk, R.R.; Stoika, R.S.; Ritter, U.; Scharff, P. Complex of C60 Fullerene with Doxorubicin as a Promising Agent in Antitumor Therapy. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 1–7.
  15. Shen, B.; Ma, Y.; Yu, S.; Ji, C. Smart Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery System for Cancer Thermo-Chemotherapy and Intracellular Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 24502–24508.
  16. Ghosh, P.; Han, G.; De, M.; Kim, C.; Rotello, V.M. Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications☆. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1307–1315.
  17. Jain, P.K.; El-Sayed, I.H.; El-Sayed, M.A. Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nano Today 2007, 2, 18–29.
  18. Saturnino, C.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Caruso, A.; Muià, N.; Longo, P.; Rosace, G.; Galletta, M.; Ielo, I.; et al. N-Thiocarbazole-based gold nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and anti-proliferative activity evaluation. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 459, 012023.
  19. Bhumkar, D.R.; Joshi, H.M.; Sastry, M.; Pokharkar, V.B. Chitosan Reduced Gold Nanoparticles as Novel Carriers for Transmucosal Delivery of Insulin. Pharm. Res. 2007, 24, 1415–1426.
  20. Brannon-Peppas, L.; Blanchette, J.O. Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 206–212.
  21. Baban, D.F.; Seymour, L.W. Control of tumour vascular permeability. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1998, 34, 109–119.
  22. Bergen, J.M.; Von Recum, H.A.; Goodman, T.T.; Massey, A.P.; Pun, S.H. Gold Nanoparticles as a Versatile Platform for Optimizing Physicochemical Parameters for Targeted Drug Delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 2006, 6, 506–516.
  23. Dixit, V.; Bossche, J.V.D.; Sherman, D.M.; Thompson, D.H.; Andres, R.P. Synthesis and Grafting of Thioctic Acid−PEG−Folate Conjugates onto Au Nanoparticles for Selective Targeting of Folate Receptor-Positive Tumor Cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006, 17, 603–609.
  24. De La Fuente, J.M.; Berry, C.C. Tat Peptide as an Efficient Molecule to Translocate Gold Nanoparticles into the Cell Nucleus. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16, 1176–1180.
  25. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Bromberg, L.; Concheiro, A. Light-sensitive Intelligent Drug Delivery Systems. Photochem. Photobiol. 2009, 85, 848–860.
  26. Kim, S.; Kim, J.-H.; Jeon, O.; Kwon, I.C.; Park, K. Engineered polymers for advanced drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009, 71, 420–430.
  27. Hoffman, A.S. Stimuli-responsive polymers: Biomedical applications and challenges for clinical translation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 10–16.
  28. Rahamathullah, S. Design and Evaluation of Controlled Release Layered Matrix Tablets of Parace-Tamol and Verapamil HCL. 2009; pp. 1–58. Available online: (accessed on 21 May 2021).
  29. Jeong, B.; Gutowska, A. Lessons from nature: Stimuli-responsive polymers and their biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 305–311.
  30. Hoffman, A.S.; Stayton, P.S. Bioconjugates of smart polymers and proteins: Synthesis and applications. Macromol. Symp. 2004, 207, 139–152.
  31. Zhang, Y.; Chan, H.F.; Leong, K.W. Advanced materials and processing for drug delivery: The past and the future. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 104–120.
  32. He, C.; Kim, S.W.; Lee, D.S. In situ gelling stimuli-sensitive block copolymer hydrogels for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2008, 127, 189–207.
  33. Hrubý, M.; Filippov, S.; Štěpánek, P. Smart polymers in drug delivery systems on crossroads: Which way deserves following? Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 65, 82–97.
  34. Adhikari, U.; Goliaei, A.; Tsereteli, L.; Berkowitz, M.L. Properties of Poloxamer Molecules and Poloxamer Micelles Dissolved in Water and Next to Lipid Bilayers: Results from Computer Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 5823–5830.
  35. Singh, S.A.; Shukla, S.R. Adsorptive removal of cobalt ions on raw and alkali-treated lemon peels. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 13, 165–178.
  36. Chen, S.; Singh, J. Controlled delivery of testosterone from smart polymer solution based systems: In vitro evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 295, 183–190.
  37. Fleige, E.; Quadir, M.A.; Haag, R. Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanocarriers for the controlled transport of active compounds: Concepts and applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 866–884.
  38. Jochum, F.D.; Theato, P. Temperature- and light-responsive smart polymer materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7468–7483.
  39. Sumaru, K.; Ohi, K.; Takagi, T.; Kanamori, T.; Shinbo, T. Photoresponsive Properties of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Hydrogel Partly Modified with Spirobenzopyran. Langmuir 2006, 22, 4353–4356.
  40. Jiang, J.; Tong, X.; Morris, D.; Zhao, Y. Toward Photocontrolled Release Using Light-Dissociable Block Copolymer Micelles. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 4633–4640.
  41. McCoy, C.P.; Rooney, C.; Edwards, C.R.; Jones, A.D.S.; Gorman, S.P. Light-Triggered Molecule-Scale Drug Dosing Devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9572–9573.
  42. Klohs, J.; Wunder, A.; Licha, K. Near-infrared fluorescent probes for imaging vascular pathophysiology. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2008, 103, 144–151.
  43. You, J.; Shao, R.; Wei, X.; Gupta, S.; Li, C. Near-Infrared Light Triggers Release of Paclitaxel from Biodegradable Microspheres: Photothermal Effect and Enhanced Antitumor Activity. Small 2010, 6, 1022–1031.
  44. Mano, J.F. Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Systems for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2008, 10, 515–527.
  45. Lin, J.; Tang, C.Y.; Ye, W.; Sun, S.-P.; Hamdan, S.H.; Volodin, A.; Van Haesendonck, C.; Sotto, A.; Luis, P.; Van der Bruggen, B. Unraveling flux behavior of superhydrophilic loose nanofiltration membranes during textile wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 493, 690–702.
  46. Cho, J.; Amya, G.; Pellegrinob, J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 1999, 33, 2517–2526.
  47. Yoon, Y.; Westerhoff, P.; Snyder, S.A.; Wert, E.C.; Yoon, J. Removal of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2007, 202, 16–23.
  48. Mohammad, A.; Teow, Y.; Ang, W.; Chung, Y.; Oatley-Radcliffe, D.; Hilal, N. Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects. Desalination 2015, 356, 226–254.
  49. Chu, K.H.; Huang, Y.; Yu, M.; Heo, J.; Flora, J.R.; Jang, A.; Jang, M.; Jung, C.; Park, C.M.; Kim, D.-H.; et al. Evaluation of graphene oxide-coated ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal at different pH and conductivity conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 181, 139–147.
  50. Mi, B. Graphene Oxide Membranes for Ionic and Molecular Sieving. Science 2014, 343, 740–742.
  51. Zinadini, S.; Zinatizadeh, A.A.; Rahimi, M.; Vatanpour, V.; Zangeneh, H. Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453, 292–301.
  52. Hu, M.; Mi, B. Enabling Graphene Oxide Nanosheets as Water Separation Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3715–3723.
  53. Chu, K.H.; Fathizadeh, M.; Yu, M.; Flora, J.R.V.; Jang, A.; Jang, M.; Park, C.M.; Yoo, S.S.; Her, N.; Yoon, Y. Evaluation of Removal Mechanisms in a Graphene Oxide-Coated Ceramic Ultrafiltration Membrane for Retention of Natural Organic Matter, Pharmaceuticals, and Inorganic Salts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40369–40377.
  54. Song, J.J.; Huang, Y.; Nam, S.-W.; Yu, M.; Heo, J.; Her, N.; Flora, J.R.; Yoon, Y. Ultrathin graphene oxide membranes for the removal of humic acid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 144, 162–167.
  55. Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Qiao, Y.; Tang, C.; Jung, C.; Yoon, Y.; Li, S.; Yu, M. Ultrafiltration Membranes with Structure-Optimized Graphene-Oxide Coatings for Antifouling Oil/Water Separation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 2, 1–7.
  56. Li, H.; Huang, Y.; Mao, Y.; Xu, W.L.; Ploehn, H.J.; Yu, M. Tuning the underwater oleophobicity of graphene oxide coatings via UV irradiation. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9849–9851.
  57. Ahn, C.H.; Baek, Y.; Lee, C.; Kim, S.O.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.-H.; Bae, S.S.; Park, J.; Yoon, J. Carbon nanotube-based membranes: Fabrication and application to desalination. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18, 1551–1559.
  58. Sianipar, M.; Kim, S.H.; Min, C.; Tijing, L.D.; Shon, H.K. Potential and performance of a polydopamine-coated multiwalled carbon nanotube/polysulfone nanocomposite membrane for ultrafiltration application. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 34, 364–373.
  59. Dudchenko, A.V.; Rolf, J.; Russell, K.; Duan, W.; Jassby, D. Organic fouling inhibition on electrically conducting carbon nanotube–polyvinyl alcohol composite ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 468, 1–10.
  60. Duan, W.; Ronen, A.; Walker, S.; Jassby, D. Polyaniline-Coated Carbon Nanotube Ultrafiltration Membranes: Enhanced Anodic Stability for In Situ Cleaning and Electro-Oxidation Processes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 22574–22584.
  61. Bosc, F.; Ayral, A.; Guizard, C. Mesoporous anatase coatings for coupling membrane separation and photocatalyzed reactions. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265, 13–19.
  62. Byun, S.; Davies, S.; Alpatova, A.; Corneal, L.; Baumann, M.; Tarabara, V.; Masten, S. Mn oxide coated catalytic membranes for a hybrid ozonation–membrane filtration: Comparison of Ti, Fe and Mn oxide coated membranes for water quality. Water Res. 2011, 45, 163–170.
  63. Wang, J.; Wang, S. A simple and eco-friendly route for fabricating iron-based coating on metal mesh for efficient oil/water separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 226, 31–38.
  64. Nghiem, L.; Mornane, P.; Potter, I.; Perera, J.; Cattrall, R.; Kolev, S. Extraction and transport of metal ions and small organic compounds using polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs). J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281, 7–41.
  65. Garcia-Rodríguez, A.; Matamoros, V.; Kolev, S.; Fontàs, C. Development of a polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) for the preconcentration of antibiotics in environmental water samples. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 492, 32–39.
  66. Vázquez, M.; Romero, V.; Fontas, C.; Antico, E.; Benavente, J. Polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs) with the ionic liquid (IL) Aliquat 336 as extractant: Effect of base polymer and IL concentration on their physical–chemical and elastic characteristics. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 455, 312–319.
  67. Laudelout, H.; Van Bladel, R.; Bolt, G.H.; Page, A.L. Thermodynamics of heterovalent cation exchange reactions in a montmorillonite clay. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1968, 64, 1477–1488.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Feedback