Bioplastics in the Circular Economy: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Bruce Ren and Version 1 by Giulia Infurna.

The European Union is working towards the 2050 net-zero emissions goal and tackling the ever-growing environmental and sustainability crisis by implementing the European Green Deal. The shift towards a more sustainable society is intertwined with the production, use, and disposal of plastic in the European economy. Emissions generated by plastic production, plastic waste, littering and leakage in nature, insufficient recycling, are some of the issues addressed by the European Commission. Adoption of bioplastics–plastics that are biodegradable, bio-based, or both–is under assessment as one way to decouple society from the use of fossil resources, and to mitigate specific environmental risks related to plastic waste. 

  • bioplastic
  • bio-based plastic
  • biodegradable plastic
  • bioeconomy
  • life cycle assessment
  • sustainability
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. European Commission. The European Green Deal COM(2019) 640 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
  2. European Commission. A New Circular Economy Action Plan For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe COM(2020) 98 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
  3. United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  4. Peelman, N.; Ragaert, P.; De Meulenaer, B.; Adons, D.; Peeters, R.; Cardon, L.; Van Impe, F.; Devlieghere, F. Application of bioplastics for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 32, 128–141.
  5. Pilla, S. (Ed.) Handbook of Bioplastics and Biocomposites Engineering Applications; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; ISBN 9781118203699.
  6. George, A.; Sanjay, M.R.; Srisuk, R.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. A comprehensive review on chemical properties and applications of biopolymers and their composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 329–338.
  7. European Environment Agency. The Circular Economy and the Bioeconomy—Partners in Sustainability; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2018; ISBN 9789292139742.
  8. Razza, F.; Briani, C.; Breton, T.; Marazza, D. Metrics for quantifying the circularity of bioplastics: The case of bio-based and biodegradable mulch films. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 159.
  9. Barillari, F.; Chini, F. Biopolymers—Sustainability for the Automotive Value-added Chain. ATZ Worldw. 2020, 122, 36–39.
  10. Narancic, T.; Cerrone, F.; Beagan, N.; O’Connor, K.E. Recent advances in bioplastics: Application and biodegradation. Polymers 2020, 12, 920.
  11. Kaplan, D.L. Introduction to Biopolymers from Renewable Resources. In Biopolymers from Renewable Resources; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 1–29.
  12. European Bioplastics. Bioplastics Market. Available online: (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  13. European Commission. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy COM(2018) 28 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
  14. Narancic, T.; Verstichel, S.; Reddy Chaganti, S.; Morales-Gamez, L.; Kenny, S.T.; De Wilde, B.; Babu Padamati, R.; O’Connor, K.E. Biodegradable Plastic Blends Create New Possibilities for End-of-Life Management of Plastics but They Are Not a Panacea for Plastic Pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 10441–10452.
  15. Shen, L.; Worrell, E.; Patel, M.K. Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 55, 34–52.
  16. Zhu, Y.; Romain, C.; Williams, C.K. Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature 2016, 540, 354–362.
  17. Kawasaki, J.; Silalertruksa, T.; Scheyvens, H.; Yamanoshita, M. Environmental sustainability and climate benefits of green technology for bioethanol production in Thailand. J. Int. Soc. Southeast Asian Agric. Sci. 2015, 21, 78–95.
  18. Brizga, J.; Hubacek, K.; Feng, K. The Unintended Side Effects of Bioplastics: Carbon, Land, and Water Footprints. One Earth 2020, 3, 45–53.
  19. Yates, M.R.; Barlow, C.Y. Life cycle assessments of biodegradable, commercial biopolymers—A critical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2013, 78, 54–66.
  20. Spierling, S.; Knüpffer, E.; Behnsen, H.; Mudersbach, M.; Krieg, H.; Springer, S.; Albrecht, S.; Herrmann, C.; Endres, H.J. Bio-based plastics—A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 476–491.
  21. Matsuura, E.; Ye, Y.; He, X. Sustainability opportunities and challenges of bioplastics. Master Thesis, School of Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, 2008.
  22. Hottle, T.A.; Bilec, M.M.; Landis, A.E. Sustainability assessments of bio-based polymers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 1898–1907.
  23. Álvarez-Chávez, C.R.; Edwards, S.; Moure-Eraso, R.; Geiser, K. Sustainability of bio-based plastics: General comparative analysis and recommendations for improvement. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 23, 47–56.
  24. Hottle, T.A.; Bilec, M.M.; Landis, A.E. Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 122, 295–306.
  25. Bisinella, V.; Albizzati, P.F.; Astrup, T.F.; Damgaard, A. Life Cycle Assessment of Grocery Carrier Bags; Danish Environmental Protection Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2018; pp. 1–144.
  26. Rutkowska, M.; Krasowska, K.; Heimowska, A.; Steinka, I.; Janik, H. Degradation of polyurethanes in sea water. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2002, 76, 233–239.
  27. Saygin, H.; Baysal, A. Degradation of subµ-sized bioplastics by clinically important bacteria under sediment and seawater conditions: Impact on the bacteria responses. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2020, 56, 1–12.
  28. Tokiwa, Y.; Calabia, B.P.; Ugwu, C.U.; Aiba, S. Biodegradability of plastics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3722–3742.
  29. Kale, G.; Auras, R.; Singh, S.P.; Narayan, R. Biodegradability of polylactide bottles in real and simulated composting conditions. Polym. Test. 2007, 26, 1049–1061.
  30. Accinelli, C.; Saccà, M.L.; Mencarelli, M.; Vicari, A. Deterioration of bioplastic carrier bags in the environment and assessment of a new recycling alternative. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 136–143.
  31. Babu, R.P.; O’Connor, K.; Seeram, R. Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Prog. Biomater. 2013, 2, 8.
  32. Nakajima, H.; Dijkstra, P.; Loos, K. The Recent Developments in Biobased Polymers toward General and Engineering Applications: Polymers that are Upgraded from Biodegradable Polymers, Analogous to Petroleum-Derived Polymers, and Newly Developed. Polymers 2017, 9, 523.
  33. Walker, S.; Rothman, R. Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 121158.
  34. Bishop, G.; Styles, D.; Lens, P.N.L. Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105451.
  35. Harrison, J.P.; Boardman, C.; O’Callaghan, K.; Delort, A.-M.; Song, J. Biodegradability standards for carrier bags and plastic films in aquatic environments: A critical review. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 171792.
  36. PlasticsEurope Plastics—The Facts. 2020. pp. 1–64. Available online: (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  37. Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.R.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 25–29.
  38. UNEP Web Page—Beat Plastic Pollution. Available online: (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  39. European Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council: On the Reduction of the Impact of Certain Plastic Products on the Environment COM(2018) 340 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
  40. Lebreton, L.; Slat, B.; Ferrari, F.; Sainte-Rose, B.; Aitken, J.; Marthouse, R.; Hajbane, S.; Cunsolo, S.; Schwarz, A.; Levivier, A.; et al. Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4666.
  41. European Commission. A Circular Economy for Plastics—Insights from Research and Innovation to Inform Policy and Funding Decisions; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; ISBN 9789279984297.
  42. Gallo, F.; Fossi, C.; Weber, R.; Santillo, D.; Sousa, J.; Ingram, I.; Nadal, A.; Romano, D. Marine litter plastics and microplastics and their toxic chemicals components: The need for urgent preventive measures. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2018, 30, 13.
  43. UNEP. Marine Litter Vital Graphics; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2016; ISBN 9788277011530.
  44. Gregory, M.R. Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings—Entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2013–2025.
  45. Zettler, E.R.; Mincer, T.J.; Amaral-Zettler, L.A. Life in the “plastisphere”: Microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 7137–7146.
  46. Andrady, A.L. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1596–1605.
  47. Rochman, C.M.; Tahir, A.; Williams, S.L.; Baxa, D.V.; Lam, R.; Miller, J.T.; Teh, F.-C.; Werorilangi, S.; Teh, S.J. Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14340.
  48. Smith, M.; Love, D.C.; Rochman, C.M.; Neff, R.A. Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2018, 5, 375–386.
  49. Dehaut, A.; Cassone, A.-L.; Frère, L.; Hermabessiere, L.; Himber, C.; Rinnert, E.; Rivière, G.; Lambert, C.; Soudant, P.; Huvet, A.; et al. Microplastics in seafood: Benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 215, 223–233.
  50. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics; Ellen MacArthur Found: Cowes, UK, 2016; p. 120.
  51. European Commission. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; ISBN 9789279941450.
  52. European Commission. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
  53. Sander, M.; Filatova, T.; Weber, M. Biodegradability of Plastics in the Open Environment; ETH Zurich: Zürich, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 9783982030180.
  54. European Commission Directorate-General for Environment. Plastic Waste in the Environment—Final Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011; p. 171.
  55. Garlotta, D. A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid). J. Polym. Environ. 2001, 9, 63–84.
  56. Madhavan Nampoothiri, K.; Nair, N.R.; John, R.P. An overview of the recent developments in polylactide (PLA) research. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8493–8501.
  57. Chanprateep, S. Current trends in biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010, 110, 621–632.
  58. Xu, J.; Guo, B.H. Poly(butylene succinate) and its copolymers: Research, development and industrialization. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 1149–1163.
  59. Siracusa, V.; Blanco, I. Bio-Polyethylene (Bio-PE), Bio-Polypropylene (Bio-PP) and Bio-Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (Bio-PET): Recent Developments in Bio-Based Polymers Analogous to Petroleum-Derived Ones for Packaging and Engineering Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1641.
  60. Labet, M.; Thielemans, W. Synthesis of polycaprolactone: A review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3484.
  61. Aslam, M.; Kalyar, M.A.; Raza, Z.A. Polyvinyl alcohol: A review of research status and use of polyvinyl alcohol based nanocomposites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2018, 58, 2119–2132.
  62. Ferreira, F.V.; Cividanes, L.S.; Gouveia, R.F.; Lona, L.M.F. An overview on properties and applications of poly(butylene adipate- co -terephthalate)-PBAT based composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, E7–E15.
  63. Auras, R.; Lim, L.-T.; Selke, S.E.M.; Tsuji, H. (Eds.) Poly(Lactic Acid); John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 53, ISBN 9780470649848.
  64. Drumright, R.E.; Gruber, P.R.; Henton, D.E. Polylactic Acid Technology. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1841–1846.
  65. Mehta, R.; Kumar, V.; Bhunia, H.; Upadhyay, S.N. Synthesis of poly(lactic acid): A review. J. Macromol. Sci. Polym. Rev. 2005, 45, 325–349.
  66. Pantani, R.; Sorrentino, A. Influence of crystallinity on the biodegradation rate of injection-moulded poly(lactic acid) samples in controlled composting conditions. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 1089–1096.
  67. Perego, G.; Cella, G.D.; Bastioli, C. Effect of molecular weight and crystallinity on poly(lactic acid) mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59, 37–43.
  68. Auras, R.; Harte, B.; Selke, S. An Overview of Polylactides as Packaging Materials. Macromol. Biosci. 2004, 4, 835–864.
  69. Castro-Aguirre, E.; Iñiguez-Franco, F.; Samsudin, H.; Fang, X.; Auras, R. Poly(lactic acid)—Mass production, processing, industrial applications, and end of life. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 333–366.
  70. Cicala, G.; Giordano, D.; Tosto, C.; Filippone, G.; Recca, A.; Blanco, I. Polylactide (PLA) Filaments a Biobased Solution for Additive Manufacturing: Correlating Rheology and Thermomechanical Properties with Printing Quality. Materials 2018, 11, 1191.
  71. Meraldo, A. Introduction to Bio-Based Polymers; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 9780323371001.
  72. Bechthold, I.; Bretz, K.; Kabasci, S.; Kopitzky, R.; Springer, A. Succinic acid: A new platform chemical for biobased polymers from renewable resources. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008, 31, 647–654.
  73. Gigli, M.; Fabbri, M.; Lotti, N.; Gamberini, R.; Rimini, B.; Munari, A. Poly(butylene succinate)-based polyesters for biomedical applications: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 75, 431–460.
  74. Aditiya, H.B.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Chong, W.T.; Nur, H.; Sebayang, A.H. Second generation bioethanol production: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 631–653.
  75. Vroman, I.; Tighzert, L. Biodegradable polymers. Materials 2009, 2, 307–344.
  76. Law, R.C. 5. Applications of cellulose acetate 5.1 Cellulose acetate in textile application. Macromol. Symp. 2004, 208, 255–266.
  77. Rustemeyer, P. 5.2 CA filter tow for cigarette filters. Macromol. Symp. 2004, 208, 267–292.
  78. Shibata, T. 5.6 Cellulose acetate in separation technology. Macromol. Symp. 2004, 208, 353–370.
  79. Fischer, S.; Thümmler, K.; Volkert, B.; Hettrich, K.; Schmidt, I.; Fischer, K. Properties and applications of cellulose acetate. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 262, 89–96.
  80. Puls, J.; Wilson, S.A.; Hölter, D. Degradation of Cellulose Acetate-Based Materials: A Review. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 152–165.
  81. Rose, M.; Palkovits, R. Cellulose-Based Sustainable Polymers: State of the Art and Future Trends. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2011, 32, 1299–1311.
  82. Wang, S.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 169–206.
  83. Chen, J. Synthetic Textile Fibers. In Textiles and Fashion; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 79–95.
  84. Liu, H.; Xie, F.; Yu, L.; Chen, L.; Li, L. Thermal processing of starch-based polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 1348–1368.
  85. Zhang, Y.; Rempel, C.; Liu, Q. Thermoplastic Starch Processing and Characteristics—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1353–1370.
  86. Da Róz, A.L.; Carvalho, A.J.F.; Gandini, A.; Curvelo, A.A.S. The effect of plasticizers on thermoplastic starch compositions obtained by melt processing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 63, 417–424.
  87. Lörcks, J. Properties and applications of compostable starch-based plastic material. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998, 59, 245–249.
  88. Santana, Á.L.; Angela, A.; Meireles, M. New Starches are the Trend for Industry Applications: A Review. Food Public Health 2014, 4, 229–241.
  89. Mohamad Yazid, N.S.; Abdullah, N.; Muhammad, N.; Matias-Peralta, H.M. Application of Starch and Starch-Based Products in Food Industry. J. Sci. Technol. 2018, 10.
  90. Samsudin, H.; Hani, N.M. Use of Starch in Food Packaging. In Starch-Based Materials in Food Packaging; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 229–256.
  91. Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial polymers: Biosynthesis, modifications and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 578–592.
  92. Wang, Y.; Yin, J.; Chen, G.-Q. Polyhydroxyalkanoates, challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 59–65.
  93. Lee, S.Y. Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 49, 1–14.
  94. Reddy, C.S.K.; Ghai, R.; Kalia, V. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87, 137–146.
  95. Kathiraser, Y.; Aroua, M.K.; Ramachandran, K.B.; Tan, I.K.P. Chemical characterization of medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) recovered by enzymatic treatment and ultrafiltration. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 847–855.
  96. Keshavarz, T.; Roy, I. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Bioplastics with a green agenda. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 321–326.
  97. Hazer, B.; Steinbüchel, A. Increased diversification of polyhydroxyalkanoates by modification reactions for industrial and medical applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74, 1–12.
  98. Chen, G.; Wang, Y. Medical applications of biopolyesters polyhydroxyalkanoates. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2013, 31, 719–736.
  99. ISO Online Browsing Platform. Available online: (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  100. CEN Online Standards Search. Available online: (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  101. Folino, A.; Karageorgiou, A.; Calabrò, P.S.; Komilis, D. Biodegradation of wasted bioplastics in natural and industrial environments: A review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6030.
  102. Briassoulis, D.; Degli Innocenti, F. Standards for Soil Biodegradable Plastics. In Soil Degradable Bioplastics for a Sustainable Modern Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 139–168.
  103. Emadian, S.M.; Onay, T.T.; Demirel, B. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Manag. 2017, 59, 526–536.
  104. Ahn, H.K.; Huda, M.S.; Smith, M.C.; Mulbry, W.; Schmidt, W.F.; Reeves, J.B. Biodegradability of injection molded bioplastic pots containing polylactic acid and poultry feather fiber. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 4930–4933.
  105. Tabasi, R.Y.; Ajji, A. Selective degradation of biodegradable blends in simulated laboratory composting. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 120, 435–442.
  106. Lucas, N.; Bienaime, C.; Belloy, C.; Queneudec, M.; Silvestre, F.; Nava-Saucedo, J.E. Polymer biodegradation: Mechanisms and estimation techniques—A review. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 429–442.
  107. Haider, T.P.; Völker, C.; Kramm, J.; Landfester, K.; Wurm, F.R. Plastics of the Future? The Impact of Biodegradable Polymers on the Environment and on Society. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 50–62.
  108. Fojt, J.; David, J.; Přikryl, R.; Řezáčová, V.; Kučerík, J. A critical review of the overlooked challenge of determining micro-bioplastics in soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 745, 140975.
  109. Flemming, H.C. Relevance of biofilms for the biodeterioration of surfaces of polymeric materials. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998, 59, 309–315.
  110. Gu, J.D. Microbiological deterioration and degradation of synthetic polymeric materials: Recent research advances. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2003, 52, 69–91.
  111. Pauli, N.-C.; Petermann, J.S.; Lott, C.; Weber, M. Macrofouling communities and the degradation of plastic bags in the sea: An in situ experiment. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 170549.
More
Video Production Service