Wound Healing Material: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Karina Chen and Version 1 by Harishkumar Madhyastha.

Dermal wound healing describes the progressive repair and recalcitrant mechanism of damaged skin, and eventually, reformatting and reshaping the skin. Many probiotics, nutritional supplements, metal nanoparticles, composites, skin constructs, polymers, and so forth have been associated with the improved healing process of wounds. The exact mechanism of material-cellular interaction is a point of immense importance, particularly in pathological conditions such as diabetes. Bioengineered alternative agents will likely continue to dominate the outpatient and perioperative management of chronic, recalcitrant wounds as new products continue to cut costs and improve the wound healing process. 

  • dermal wound healing
  • nanoceuticals
  • metal nanoparticles
  • bioengineered alternatives
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Singh, M.; Nuutila, K.; Kruse, C.; Robson, M.C.; Caterson, E.; Eriksson, E. Challenging the conventional therapy: Emerging skin graft techniques for wound healing. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015, 136, 524e–530e.
  2. Kaufman, C.L.; Bhutiani, N.; Ramirez, A.; Tien, H.Y.; Palazzo, M.D.; Galvis, E.; Farner, S.; Ozyurekoglu, T.; Jones, C.M. Current status of vascularized composite allotransplantation. Am. Surg. 2019, 85, 631–637.
  3. Benichou, G.; Yamada, Y.; Yun, S.H.; Lin, C.; Fray, M.; Tocco, G. Immune recognition and rejection of allogeneic skin grafts. Immunotherapy 2011, 3, 757–770.
  4. Wyburn, K.R.; Jose, M.D.; Wu, H.; Atkins, R.C.; Chadban, S.J. The role of macrophages in allograft rejection. Transplantation 2005, 80, 1641–1647.
  5. Ouimet, M.; Ediriweera, H.N.; Gundra, U.M.; Sheedy, F.J.; Ramkhelawon, B.; Hutchison, S.B.; Rinehold, K.; van Solingen, C.; Fullerton, M.D.; Cecchini, K.; et al. MicroRNA-33–dependent regulation of macrophage metabolism directs immune cell polarization in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 4334–4348.
  6. Ekser, B.; Ezzelarab, M.; Hara, H.; van der Windt, D.J.; Wijkstrom, M.; Bottino, R.; Trucco, M.; Cooper, D.K. Clinical xenotransplantation: The next medical revolution? Lancet 2012, 379, 672–683.
  7. Ovington, L.G. Advances in wound dressings. Clin. Dermatol. 2007, 25, 33–38.
  8. Fonder, M.A.; Mamelak, A.J.; Lazarus, G.S.; Chanmugam, A. Occlusive wound dressings in emergency medicine and acute care. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 25, 235–242.
  9. Ghalei, S.; Nourmohammadi, J.; Solouk, A.; Mirzadeh, H. Enhanced cellular response elicited by addition of amniotic fluid to alginate hydrogel-electrospun silk fibroin fibers for potential wound dressing application. Colloids Surf. B 2018, 172, 82–89.
  10. Aderibigbe, B.A.; Buyana, B. Alginate in wound dressings. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 42.
  11. Wu, S.; Deng, L.; Hsia, H.; Xu, K.; He, Y.; Huang, Q.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Peng, C. Evaluation of gelatin-hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels for accelerating wound healing. J. Biomater. Appl. 2017, 31, 1380–1390.
  12. Derwin, R.; Moore, Z.E.; Webster, J. Hydrocolloid dressings for donor sites of split thickness skin grafts. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018.
  13. Walker, R.M.; Gillespie, B.M.; Thalib, L.; Higgins, N.S.; Whitty, J.A. Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 10.
  14. Singer, A.J.; Clark, R.A.F. Mechanisms of disease: Cutaneous wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 738–746.
  15. Shedoeva, A.; Leavesley, D.; Upton, Z.; Fan, C. Wound healing and the use of medicinal plants. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019.
  16. Daeschlein, G. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int. Wound J. 2013, 10, 9–14.
  17. Thomas, G.W.; Rael, L.T.; Bar-Or, R.; Shimonkevitz, R.; Mains, C.W.; Slone, D.S.; Craun, M.L.; Baror, D. Mechanisms of delayed wound healing by commonly used antiseptics. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2009, 66, 82–91.
  18. Noda, Y.; Fujii, K.; Fujii, S. Critical evaluation of cadexomer-iodine ointment and povidone-iodine sugar ointment. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 372, 85–90.
  19. Atiyeh, B.S.; Dibo, S.A.; Hayek, S.N. Wound cleansing, topical antiseptics and wound healing. Int. Wound J. 2009, 6, 420–430.
  20. Alves, P.J.; Barreto, R.T.; Barrois, B.M.; Gryson, L.G.; Meaume, S.; Monstrey, S.J. Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical colonisation and/or biofilm. Int. Wound J. 2020.
  21. Hess, C.L.; Howard, M.A.; Attinger, C.E. A review of mechanical adjuncts in wound healing: Hydrotherapy, ultrasound, negative pressure therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, and electrostimulation. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2003, 51, 210–218.
  22. Atkin, L.; Ousey, K. Wound bed preparation: A novel approach using hydrotherapy. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2016, 21, S23–S28.
  23. Gupta, A.; Avci, P.; Dai, T.; Huang, Y.Y.; Hamblin, M.R. Ultraviolet radiation in wound care: Sterilization and stimulation. Adv. Wound Care 2013, 2, 422–437.
  24. Herscovici, D.; Sanders, R.W.; Scaduto, J.M.; Infante, A.; DiPasquale, T. Vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC therapy) for the management of patients with high-energy soft tissue injuries. J. Orthop. Trauma 2003, 17, 683–688.
  25. Sinha, K.; Chauhan, V.D.; Maheshwari, R.; Chauhan, N.; Rajan, M.; Agrawal, A. Vacuum assisted closure therapy versus standard wound therapy for open musculoskeletal injuries. Adv. Orthop. 2013.
  26. Copeland, H.; Newcombe, J.; Yamin, F.; Bhajri, K.; Mille, V.A.; Hasaniya, N.; Bailey, L.; Razzouk, A.J. Role of negative pressure wound care and hyperbaric oxygen therapy for sternal wound infections after pediatric cardiac surgery. World J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart Surg. 2018, 9, 440–445.
  27. Thakral, G.; LaFontaine, J.; Najafi, B.; Talal, T.K.; Kim, P.; Lavery, L.A. Electrical stimulation to accelerate wound healing. Diabet. Foot Ankle 2013, 4, 22081.
  28. Sun, Y.S. Electrical stimulation for wound-healing: Simulation on the effect of electrode configurations. Biomed Res. Int. 2017.
  29. Schaden, W.; Thiele, R.; Kölpl, C.; Pusch, M.; Nissan, A.; Attinger, C.E.; Maniscalco-Theberge, M.E.; Peoples, G.E.; Elster, E.A.; Stojadinovic, A. Shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: A feasibility study. J. Surg. Res. 2007, 143, 1–12.
  30. Mouzopoulos, G.; Stamatakos, M.; Mouzopoulos, D.; Tzurbakis, M. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment for shoulder calcific tendonitis: A systematic review. Skelet Radiol. 2007, 36, 803–811.
  31. Mittermayr, R.; Hartinger, J.; Antonic, V.; Meinl, A.; Pfeifer, S.; Stojadinovic, A.; Schaden, W.; Redl, H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) minimizes ischemic tissue necrosis irrespective of application time and promotes tissue revascularization by stimulating angiogenesis. Ann. Surg. 2011, 253, 1024–1032.
  32. Yan, X.; Zeng, B.; Chai, Y.; Luo, C.; Li, X. Improvement of blood flow, expression of nitric oxide, and vascular endothelial growth factor by low-energy shockwave therapy in random-pattern skin flap model. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2008, 61, 646–653.
  33. Hawkins, D.; Houreld, N.; Abrahamse, H. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) as an effective therapeutic modality for delayed wound healing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1056, 486–493.
  34. Schindl, A.; Schindl, M.; Pernerstorfer-Schön, H.; Schindl, L. Low-intensity laser therapy: A review. J. Investig. Med. 2000, 48, 312–326.
  35. Pessoa, E.S.; Melhado, R.M.; Theodoro, L.H.; Garcia, V.G. A histologic assessment of the influence of low-intensity laser therapy on wound healing in steroid-treated animals. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2004, 22, 199–204.
  36. Manuskiatti, W.; Fitzpatrick, R.E. Treatment response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars: Comparison among intralesional corticosteroid, 5-fluorouracil, and 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser treatments. Arch. Dermatol. 2002, 138, 1149–1155.
  37. Mihai, M.M.; Dima, M.B.; Dima, B.; Holban, A.M. Nanomaterials for wound healing and infection control. Materials 2019, 12, 2176.
  38. Kalashnikova, I.; Das, S.; Seal, S. Nanomaterials for wound healing: Scope and advancement. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 2593–2612.
  39. Rigo, C.; Ferroni, L.; Tocco, I.; Roman, M.; Munivrana, I.; Gardin, C.; Cairns, W.R.; Vindigni, V.; Azzena, B.; Barbante, C.; et al. Active silver nanoparticles for wound healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 4817–4840.
  40. Chakrabarti, S.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Islam, J.; Ray, S.; Raju, P.S.; Mazumder, B. Aspects of nanomaterials in wound healing. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 26–41.
  41. Fong, J.; Wood, F.; Fowler, B. A silver coated dressing reduces the incidence of early burn wound cellulitis and associated costs of inpatient treatment: Comparative patient care audits. Burns 2005, 31, 562–567.
  42. Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Ran, B.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, G.; Shao, H.; Jiang, X. Pharmaceutical intermediate-modified gold nanoparticles: Against multidrug-resistant bacteria and wound-healing application via an electrospun scaffold. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5737–5745.
  43. Marza, S.; Magyari, K. Skin wound regeneration with bioactive glass-gold nanoparticles ointment. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 14, 025011.
  44. Madhyastha, H.; Halder, S.; Madhyastha, R.; Mohanapriya, A.; Sudhakaran, R.; Sajitha, L.S.; Banerjee, K.; Bethasiwi, P.; Daima, H.; Navya, P.N.; et al. Surface refined Au Quercetin nanoconjugate stimulates dermal cell migration: Possible implication in wound healing. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 37683–37694.
  45. Woo, K.Y.; Sibbald, R.G. The improvement of wound-associated pain and healing trajectory with a comprehensive foot and leg ulcer care model. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2009, 36, 184–191.
  46. Balaure, P.C.; Holban, A.M.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Mogo¸sanu, G.D.; Bal¸seanu, T.A.; Stan, M.S.; Dinischiotu, A.; Volceanov, A.; Mogoanta, L. In vitro and in vivo studies of novel fabricated bioactive dressings based on collagen and zinc oxide 3D scaffolds. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 557, 199–207.
  47. Lin, P.H.; Sermersheim, M.; Li, H.; Lee, P.H.; Steinberg, S.M.; Ma, J. Zinc in wound healing modulation. Nutrients 2018, 10, 16.
  48. Khan, M.I.; Behera, S.K.; Paul, P.; Das, B.; Suar, M.; Jayabalan, R.; Fawcett, D.; Poinern, G.E.J.; Tripathy, S.K.; Mishra, A. Biogenic core-shell nanocomposites kill Staphylococcus aureus without provoking nuclear damage and cytotoxicity in mouse fibroblasts cells under hyperglycemic condition with enhanced wound healing proficiency. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2018.
  49. Sood, R.; Chopra, D.S. Optimization of reaction conditions to fabricate Ocimum sanctum synthesized silver nanoparticles and its application to nano-gel systems for burn wounds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 92, 575–589.
  50. Ye, H.; Cheng, J.; Yu, K. In situ reduction of silver nanoparticles by gelatin to obtain porous silver nanoparticle/chitosan composites with enhanced antimicrobial and wound-healing activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 633–642.
  51. Shao, F.; Yang, A.; Yu, D.M.; Wang, J.; Gong, X.; Tian, H.X. Bio-synthesis of Barleria gibsoni leaf extract mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles and their formulation gel for wound therapy in nursing care of infants and children. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 189, 267–273.
  52. Biranje, S.S.; Madiwale, P.V.; Patankar, K.C.; Chhabra, R.; Dandekar-Jain, P.; Adivarekar, R.V. Hemostasis and anti-necrotic activity of wound-healing dressing containing chitosan nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 936–946.
  53. Chen, Y.; Dan, N.; Dan, W.; Liu, X.; Cong, L. A novel antibacterial acellular porcine dermal matrix cross-linked with oxidized chitosan oligosaccharide and modified by in situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles for wound healing applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 94, 1020–1036.
  54. Gao, G.; Jiang, Y.-W.; Jia, H.-R.; Wu, F.-G. Near-infrared light-controllable on-demand antibiotics release using thermo-sensitive hydrogel-based drug reservoir for combating bacterial infection. Biomaterials 2019, 188, 83–95.
  55. Hernandez Martinez, S.P.; Rivera González, T.; Franco Molina, M.; Bollain y Goytia, J.; Martínez Sanmiguel, J.; Zárate Triviño, D.; Rodríguez Padilla, C. A Novel Gold Calreticulin Nanocomposite Based on Chitosan for Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mice Model. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 75.
  56. Khalid, A.; Khan, R.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, T.; Wahid, F. Bacterial cellulose-zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 164, 214–221.
  57. Alberti, T.B.; Coelho, D.S.; de Prá, M.; Maraschin, M.; Veleirinho, B. Electrospun PVA nanoscaffolds associated with propolis nanoparticles with wound healing activity. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 9712–9727.
  58. Barnes, C.P.; Sell, S.A.; Boland, E.D.; Simpson, D.G.; Bowlin, G.L. Nanofiber technology: Designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 1413–1433.
  59. An, J.; Chua, C.K.; Yu, T.; Li, H.; Tan, L.P. Advanced nanobiomaterial strategies for the development of organized tissue engineering constructs. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 591–602.
  60. Dong, R.H.; Jia, Y.-X.; Qin, C.-C.; Zhan, L.; Yan, X.; Cui, L.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, X.; Long, Y.-Z. In situ deposition of a personalized nanofibrous dressing via a handy electrospinning device for skin wound care. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 3482–3488.
  61. Gholipour-Kanani, A.; Bahrami, S.H.; Rabbani, S. Effect of novel blend of nanofibrous scaffolds on diabetic wounds healing. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 10, 1–7.
  62. Chu, Y.; Yu, D.; Wang, P.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Ding, M. Nanotechnology promotes the full-thickness diabetic wound healing effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor in diabetic rats. Wound Repair Regen. 2010, 18, 499–505.
  63. Zhang, X.; Kang, X.; Jin, L.; Bai, J.; Liu, W.; Wang, Z.; Ji, L. Stimulation of wound healing using bioinspired hydrogels with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 3897–3906.
  64. Wang, S.; Yan, C.; Zhang, X.; Shi, D.; Chi, L.; Luo, G.; Deng, J. Antimicrobial peptide modification enhances the gene delivery and bactericidal efficiency of gold nanoparticles for accelerating diabetic wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 2757–2772.
  65. Zgheib, C.; Hilton, S.A.; Dewberry, L.C.; Hodges, M.M.; Ghatak, S.; Xu, J.; Singh, S.; Roy, S.; Sen, C.K.; Seal, S.; et al. Use of cerium oxide nanoparticles conjugated with MicroRNA-146a to correct the diabetic wound healing impairment. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 228, 107–115.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback