Rabbit Sperm Cryopreservation: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Jianglin Fan and Version 2 by Vicky Zhou.

Sperm cryopreservation is one of the most efficient ways to preserve rabbit strains because it is easy to collect ejaculate repeatedly from a single male and inseminate artificially into multiple females. During the cooling, freezing and thawing process of sperms, the plasma membrane, cytoplasm and genome structures could be damaged by osmotic stress, cold shock, intracellular ice crystal formation, and excessive production of reactive oxygen species.

  • rabbit
  • sperm quality
  • cryopreservation
  • animal model
  • assisted reproductive technology

1. Introduction

Rabbits have been indispensable for human life because they are not only valuable for agriculture but also for biomedical research. Rabbits are widely used as a source of meat, hair and fur, and it is estimated that each year, around 300 million rabbits (and hares) are used in the world [1]. Because of their tame characters, rabbits are also raised as a pet. In addition, rabbits are the most-used animals for antibody production for biomedical research. Furthermore, rabbits are similar to humans in terms of cardiovascular physiology and lipid metabolism, and they play an important role in studying human diseases such as atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia [2][3]. Along with the development of genetic engineering, many gene-modified rabbits have been created as experimental models of human diseases. In addition to transgenic rabbits produced with the conventional pronuclear microinjection technique, knockout rabbits have been established using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology [4]. These genetically modified rabbits are valuable and thus it is vitally important to breed and maintain rabbit strains for different purposes and preserve them as bio-resources [5].

2. Major Ways to Preserve Rabbit Strains

There are two major ways to preserve rabbit strains. The common way to maintain a rabbit colony is carried out simply by repeat breeding. However, several difficulties with this method exist including space and cost. In particular, rabbit shows severe inbreeding depression [6][7][8][9], thus a considerable number of rabbits are required to keep a colony. For laboratory rabbits, they are usually housed in strictly controlled conditions in terms of temperature, humidity, illumination and microbiological examinations. Furthermore, living animals have a risk of annihilation or escape in the case of a disaster or accident.

The second method of maintaining the rabbit colony is the cryopreservation of gametes. Cryopreservation of gametes requires less space and cost than animal breeding. It is generally believed that properly cryopreserved zygotes and gametes can be preserved semi-eternally in a liquid nitrogen tank to keep their fertile and developmental ability. In the case of employing ovum or embryo preservation, ova or embryos are generally obtained with oviduct–uterus dissection from sacrificed females, and a skillful surgical operation is required for the embryo transfer. In contrast, ejected semen can be collected repeatedly without sacrificing males (Figure 1) and artificially inseminated into females can be conducted without specific skills, and thus, sperm cryopreservation would be the first choice for preservation of rabbit strains even though sperms preserved can bring paternal hereditary information only, and immediate offspring is always heterozygosity. However, when concerned with one specific transgene, homozygotes can be obtained in the second generation. Even in the case of livestock animals concerning pedigree related with polygenetic factors, the inbreeding can be avoided by mating live females and cryopreserved sperm with a generation gap.

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of the essential process of sperm cryopreservation. (

A

) Semen is collected with an artificial vagina; (

B

) semen is diluted with a freezing extender; (

C

) sperm solution is cooled at slow rate (with a programming incubator); (

D

) sperm solution packed in freezing straws are frozen in vapor of liquid nitrogen; (

E

) vitrification is another option for sperm freezing; (

F

) sperms are cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, and (

G

) sperms are thawed by immersion in a warm bath.

As mentioned above, the successful preservation of rabbits depends on the efficiency and reliability of procedures in sperm cryopreservation. It is known that the process of sperm cryopreservation, including cooling, freezing and thawing, leads to cellular damage on membrane, cytoplasm and genome structures [10][11] caused by osmotic stress, cold shock, intracellular ice crystal formation, and excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [12] (Figure 2). During the cooling process, the sperm membrane is injured by cold shock which can be diminished by cooling rate [13] or materials stabilizing the membrane including egg yolk or skim milk [14]. The addition of cryoprotectants causes osmotic and toxic stress, which increases due to prolonged exposure during slow cooling [15]. In the following freezing process, major problem is ice crystal formation which grows larger by recrystallization and injures cell [16]. The freezing rate and cryoprotectants application should be considered to diminish the problem. Recrystallization occurs during the thawing process because of entry through the recrystallization temperature zone. Since sperms suffer from oxidative stress throughout the cryopreservation process [12], supplementation of antioxidants is considerable for the improvement of sperm quality.

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of temperature changes during sperm cryopreservation process and associated problems.
Enormous efforts have been exerted to minimize these detrimental effects, and increase the efficiency and reliability of sperm cryopreservation in the rabbit. In this review, we will discuss recent findings and perspectives including extenders, cryoprotectants, supplements and procedures.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Database. 2019. Available online: (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  2. Fan, J.; Kitajima, S.; Watanabe, T.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, E.; Chen, Y.E. Rabbit models for the study of human atherosclerosis: From pathophysiological mechanisms to translational medicine. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 146, 104–119.
  3. Shiomi, M. The History of the WHHL Rabbit, an Animal Model of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (I)—Contribution to the Elucidation of the Pathophysiology of Human Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart Disease. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2020, 27, 105–118.
  4. Matsuhisa, F.; Kitajima, S.; Nishijima, K.; Akiyoshi, T.; Morimoto, M.; Fan, J. Transgenic Rabbit Models: Now and the Future. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7416.
  5. Mazur, P.; Leibo, S.P.; Seidel, G.E., Jr. Cryopreservation of the germplasm of animals used in biological and medical research: Importance, impact, status, and future directions. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 78, 2–12.
  6. Casellas, J.; Vidal-Roqueta, D.; Flores, E.; Casellas-Vidal, D.; Llach-Vila, M.; Salgas-Fina, R.; Casellas-Molas, P. Epistasis for founder specific inbreeding depression in rabbits. J. Hered. 2011, 102, 157–164.
  7. Chai, C.K. Effects of inbreeding in rabbits. Inbred lines, discrete characters, breeding performance, and mortality. J. Hered. 1969, 60, 64–70.
  8. Chai, C.K.; Degenhardt, K.H. Developmental anomaties in inbred rabbits. J. Hered. 1962, 53, 174–182.
  9. Ragab, M.; Sánchez, J.P.; Baselga, M. Effective population size and inbreeding depression on litter size in rabbits. A case study. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2015, 132, 68–73.
  10. Isachenko, E.; Isachenko, V.; Katkov, I.I.; Dessole, S.; Nawroth, F. Vitrification of mammalian spermatozoa in the absence of cryoprotectants: From past practical difficulties to present success. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2003, 6, 191–200.
  11. Watson, P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60–61, 481–492.
  12. Amidi, F.; Pazhohan, A.; Shabani Nashtaei, M.; Khodarahmian, M.; Nekoonam, S. The role of antioxidants in sperm freezing: A review. Cell Tissue Bank 2016, 17, 745–756.
  13. Parrish, J.J.; Foote, R. Fertility of cooled and frozen rabbit sperm measured by competitive fertilization. Biol. Reprod. 1986, 35, 253–257.
  14. Mocé, E.; Vicente, J.S. Rabbit sperm cryopreservation: A review. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 110, 1–24.
  15. Mazur, P. The role of intracellular freezing in the death of cellscooled at supraoptimal rates. Cryobiology 1977, 14, 251–272.
  16. Koshimoto, C.; Mazur, P. Effects of warming rate, temperature, and antifreeze proteins on the survival of mouse spermatozoa frozen at an optimal rate. Cryobiology 2002, 45, 49–59.
  17. Mocé, E.; Lavara, R.; Vicente, J.S. Influence of the donor male on the fertility of frozen-thawed rabbit sperm after artificial insemination of females of different genotypes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005, 40, 516–521.
  18. Kulíková, B.; Oravcová, M.; Baláži, A.; Supuka, P.; Chrenek, P. Factors affecting storage of Slovak native rabbit semen in the gene bank. Zygote 2017, 25, 592–600.
  19. Martínez-Soto, J.C.; Landeras, J.; Gadea, J. Spermatozoa and seminal plasma fatty acids as predictors of cryopreservation success. Andrology 2013, 1, 365–375.
  20. Rickard, J.P.; Leahy, T.; Soleilhavoup, C.; Tsikis, G.; Labas, V.; Harichaux, G.; Lynch, G.W.; Druart, X.; de Graaf, S.P. The identification of proteomic markers of sperm freezing resilience in ram seminal plasma. J. Proteom. 2015, 126, 303–311.
  21. Vilagran, I.; Castillo, J.; Bonet, S.; Sancho, S.; Yeste, M.; Estanyol, J.M.; Oliva, R. Acrosin-binding protein (ACRBP) and triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) are good markers to predict boar sperm freezing capacity . Theriogenology 2013, 80, 443–450.
  22. Vilagran, I.; Yeste, M.; Sancho, S.; Castillo, J.; Oliva, R.; Bonet, S. Comparative analysis of boar seminal plasma proteome from different freezability ejaculates and identification of Fibronectin 1 as sperm freezability marker. Andrology 2015, 3, 345–356.
  23. Wang, P.; Wang, Y.F.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.W.; Zan, L.S.; Hu, J.H.; Li, Q.W.; Jia, Y.H.; Ma, G.J. HSP90 expression correlation with the freezing resistance of bull sperm. Zygote 2014, 22, 239–245.
  24. Yeste, M.; Estrada, E.; Casas, I.; Bonet, S.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. Good and bad freezability boar ejaculates differ in the integrity of nucleoprotein structure after freeze-thawing but not in ROS levels. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 929–939.
  25. Casares-Crespo, L.; Fernández-Serrano, P.; Vicente, J.S.; Marco-Jiménez, F.; Viudes-de-Castro, M.P. Rabbit seminal plasma proteome: The importance of the genetic origin. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 189, 30–42.
  26. Bezerra, M.J.B.; Arruda-Alencar, J.M.; Martins, J.A.M.; Viana, A.G.A.; Viana Neto, A.M.; Rêgo, J.P.A.; Oliveira, R.V.; Lobo, M.; Moreira, A.C.O.; Moreira, R.A.; et al. Major seminal plasma proteome of rabbits and associations with sperm quality. Theriogenology 2019, 128, 156–166.
  27. Baker, R.D.; Dziuk, P.J.; Norton, H.W. Effect of volume of semen, number of sperm and drugs on transport of sperm in artificially inseminated gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 1968, 27, 88–93.
  28. Flowers, W.L. Increasing fertilization rate of boars: Influence of number and quality of spermatozoa inseminated. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, E47–E53.
  29. Langford, G.A.; Marcus, G.J. Influence of sperm number and seminal plasma on fertility of progestagen-treated sheep in confinement. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, 65, 325–329.
  30. Berker, B.; Şükür, Y.E.; Kahraman, K.; Atabekoğlu, C.S.; Sönmezer, M.; Özmen, B.; Ateş, C. Absence of rapid and linear progressive motile spermatozoa “grade A” in semen specimens: Does it change intrauterine insemination outcomes? Urology 2012, 80, 1262–1266.
  31. Bollendorf, A.; Check, J.H.; Lurie, D. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization. J. Androl. 1996, 17, 550–557.
  32. Nagata, M.P.B.; Endo, K.; Ogata, K.; Yamanaka, K.; Egashira, J.; Katafuchi, N.; Yamanouchi, T.; Matsuda, H.; Goto, Y.; Sakatani, M.; et al. Live births from artificial insemination of microfluidic-sorted bovine spermatozoa characterized by trajectories correlated with fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3087–E3096.
  33. Fischer, B.; Chavatte-Palmer, P.; Viebahn, C.; Navarrete Santos, A.; Duranthon, V. Rabbit as a reproductive model for human health. Reproduction 2012, 144, 1–10.
More
ScholarVision Creations