Calorie Restriction on Health Span: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Bruce Ren and Version 1 by Ana Napoleão.

As the incidence of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases (CNCDs) increases, preventive approaches become more crucial. In this review, calorie restriction (CR) effects on human beings were evaluated, comparing the benefits and risks of different CR diets: classic CR vs. ketosis-inducing diets, including intermittent fasting (IF), classic ketogenic diet (CKD), fasting mimicking diet (FMD), very-low-calorie ketogenic Diet (VLCKD) and Spanish ketogenic Mediterranean diet (SKMD). Special emphasis on insulin resistance (IR) was placed, as it mediates metabolic syndrome (MS), a known risk factor for CNCD, and is predictive of MS diagnosis. 

  • diet
  • calorie restriction
  • ketosis
  • fasting
  • health span
  • lifespan
  • metabolic syndrome
  • insulin resistance
  • chronic non-communicable diseases
  • low-calorie
  • low-carb

Note: The following contents are extract from your paper. The entry will be online only after author check and submit it.

1. Introduction

I

In recent years, disease prevention, preservation of good health, health span and life span have been regaining a special interest of global society and the scientific/medical community’s attention. At the same time, we have been witnessing a marked increase in human wellbeing and longevity, together with an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases and medical costs. Taken together, these issues raise crucial questions on how we can improve health from a young age, and consequently, improve the quality of life, healthy aging and lifespan. It is known that adequate nutrition is correlated with good health [1][2]. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how different diets can affect health and lifespan, and how can different dietary approaches reduce the risk of developing chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCDs). To date, evidence has shown that a reduced caloric intake, without malnutrition, represents the most robust intervention to increase life span in model organisms, including primates, and to delay the emergence of age-related diseases [1]. Nevertheless, other dietary approaches, such as fasting and ketogenic diets, are emerging with compelling adherence, and therefore the need to understand their various impacts on health span and lifespan.

This review discusses the effects of calorie restriction (CR) through different diets—classic calorie restriction vs. calorie restriction with ketosis-inducing diets—in insulin levels, insulin resistance (IR) and glucose metabolism, associated with metabolic health and health span. The focus will be on healthy non-obese individuals.

For the research of bibliography on PubMed and SciELO databases, a combination of the following medical subject headings (MeSH) was used: calorie restriction, fasting mimicking diets, fasting, ketogenic diet, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, healthy aging, performance.

The reasons behind the choice of “insulin resistance” as a health span indicator are the well-established roles of IR as a powerful risk factor for CNCD—Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), coronary inflammation, heart disease, some forms of cancer, and others. IR predicts the risk of developing T2DM as early as thirty years before diagnosis. Moreover, IR and the compensatory hyperinsulinemia play a role in the pathogenesis of hypertension, inhibition of fibrinolysis, and stimulation of vascular smooth muscle proliferation and migration, all leading to atherosclerosis [3]. Insulin also plays a pivotal role in other common diseases that affect the quality of life of individuals, such as acne and polycystic ovary syndrome [4].

2. Calorie Restriction, Definition and Effects

Calorie restriction (CR) is a nutritional intervention of recent yearsduced energy intake of about 25–30% without lack of essential nutrients [1], with a well-establishedisease prevention, preserva role to extend health span and lifespan in rodent and primate models. Throughout the literature, the term CR is often used interchangeably with dietary restriction (DR). However, CR is a partial example of DR as DR protocols include CR, reduction of good health, hespecific macronutrients or change in the ratio of them as well as other different feeding interventions, such as ketosis-inducing diets [1].

Observationalth span and life span have been and randomized clinical trials denote that some of the mechanisms that lead to these improvements in animal models can also be seen in humans [5][6]. In particular, modegaining a special interest of global society and the scienrate CR in humans enhances multiple metabolic and hormonal factors that are implicated in the pathogenesis of age-associated metabolic alterations, cancer and others, which are leading causes of morbidity, disability, and mortality. Furthermore, moderate CR can prevent and reverse the harmful effects of the accumulation of excessive body fat and obesity, T2DM, dyslipidemia, hypertension, all factors included in metabolic syndrome (MS) [5][6]. IR is one of the most sific/medignificant factors implicated in these results.

2.1. Calorie Restriction, Effects on Lifespan and Health Span

Healthy aging refers to the delay of molecular al community’s atnd cellular decline for the longest length of the lifespan, as aging is characterized by the accumulation of molecular and cellular damage, leading to structural and functional aberrancies in cells and tissues [7]. CR is thention. At the same time, we have been witness most robust intervention known to increase maximal lifespan and health span. The four most important CR-induced antiaging mechanisms are thought to be: neuroendocrine system adaptations, prevention of inflammation, hormetic response, and protection against oxidative stress damage [5]. Regarding neuroendocrine system ada markedptations, important involved factors are increase in human wellbeing and longevity, together with and insulin sensitivity, reduced levels of anabolic hormones (e.g., insulin, testosterone, leptin), reduced levels of hormones that regulate thermogenesis and cellular metabolism (e.g., triiodothyronine, norepinephrine), and increase in thed levels of hormones that suppress inflammation (e.g., cortisol, adiponectin, ghrelin) [5]. In rodents, CR prevents or delays alence of chronic wide range of CNCD, such as cancer, atherosclerosis, diabetes, cardiomyopathy, kidney disease, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases [5].

Hormesis is another proposed medical costs. Taken together, these issues raise c factor to mediate the antiaging effects of chronic CR. Hormesis is defined as a beneficial biological process by which a low-intensity stressor increases resistance to another more intense stressor, by provoking a survival response in the organism, helping it to endure adversity by activating longevity pathways [5]. This theoruy cial questian explain why CR animals are more resistant to a wide range of stresses (e.g., surgery, radiation, acute inflammation, exposure to heat, and oxidative stress) [5].

CR has also beens on how we can improve h shown to enhance DNA repair systems, promote the removal of damaged proteins and oxidized lipids, and upregulate endogenous enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidative defense mechanisms [5]. On the cellulalth from a yor level, CR triggers processes such as activation of cellular stress response elements, improved autophagy and modification of apoptosis [8]. CR reduces fasting ageinsulin levels, several growth factors, profibrotic molecules, and consequently, imprytokines, including serum concentration of platelet derived growth-factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor α (TGF-α), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) [5].

Biological molecular pathways that have the quality of life, healthy agingdual ability to sense nutrients and/or energy levels while also regulating cellular processes like epigenomic remodeling, gene expression, protein activity, and organelle integrity—i.e., mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 signaling (ISS), AMP-activated protein Kinase (AMPK), sirtuins (SIRT)—each play a key role in aging [7]. Alongside, spontand lifespan. It is knowneous or induced genetic alterations on genes encoding proteins of the IIS pathway can extend maximal lifespan in animal models, and that adequate nuCR decreases serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentration by approximately 40% in rodents [5]. Genetic varition is coants and/or combinations of small-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human components of the IIS pathway correlate with low IGF-1 plasma levels in centenarians [7].

Nonetheless, a recent study with good health [1,2].modified rodents lacking mTORC2 adipocyte activity questions the idea Ttherefore, it is crucial to understand how different diets can affectat improved insulin sensitivity is the mechanism through which CR increases health span and lifespan. Rodents without mTORC2 adipocyte activity, which is needed for the improvement of insulin sensibility in CR, had displayed an increase in their health and lifespan, when exposed to CR [9].

Studies with non-human primates are also contributing to support the benefits of CR. One investigand how can differetion shows how 30% CR drastically reduces the incidence of glucose intolerance, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in primates [10][11]. Anot dietary approachher study showed that CR slowed down age-related sarcopenia, hearing loss, and brain atrophy in several subcortical regions [10][11]. In Rhesus monkeys , young-onset CR reduces the risk of developing chroand dying of cardiovascular diseases by at least 50% [3].

Some insic non-communicable diseases (CNCDs). To date, evidence has shown that aghts about the effects of CR without malnutrition in humans can be taken out of population studies. During World War 1, the Danish population was forced to reduce food consumption for 2 years, but with adequate consumption of whole-grain cereals, vegetables, and milk, which led to a 34% reduced caloric intake,tion in death rates. During World War 2, Oslo citizens also underwent a forced 20% CR without malnutrition, repre for 4 years, and in this time, mortality dropped by 30% compared to the pre-war level [6].

There is ents the most robust intervention tovidence that CR exerts a powerful anti-inflammatory effect in humans, protecting against atherosclerotic risk factors, and resulting in less carotid intima-media thickening, improved left ventricular diastolic function, and increase lifd beneficial heart rate variability [12][13]. Various metabolic span in model organismsand neuroendocrine mechanisms are responsible for this CR-mediated anti-inflammatory effect, including primates, and to delay the emergence of age-related disease low adiposity and reduced secretion of proinflammatory adipokines and cytokines, reduced plasma glucose and advanced glycation end-product concentrations, increased cortisol and ghrelin production, and increased parasympathetic tone [14].

Despite [1].there is no Nevertheless, other dietary approaches, such as fasting idence at the moment to support the idea that long-term CR with adequate nutrition extends maximal lifespan in humans, it is known that long-term CR leads to metabolic and hormonal changes seen in rodents, including reduced body temperature and resting metabolic rate, reduced markers of oxidative stress and reduced fasting insulin levels [5].

2.2. Calorie Restriction and the Effects on Insulin Sensitivity

A recent multicenter randomized kcontrol trial, CALERIE 2 [3], evaluated togenic diets, are emerging with compelling adherence, and therefore the need to understand their various impacts on health span and lifespanhe cardiometabolic risk factor responses to CR diet for 2 years in 220 young and middle-aged (21 to 50 years), healthy non-obese men and women. Participants were randomized to a 25% CR group or an ad libitum (AL) control group. Over the 2 years, the CR group achieved 11.9% CR and a sustained 10% weight loss, of which 71% was a fat mass loss. CR caused a significant and persistent reduction of all measured cardiometabolic risk factors, including Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), total cholesterol to High-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP). Additionally, CR resulted in a significant improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity index, and MS score relative to control. A secondary analysis revealed the responses to be robust after controlling for relative weight loss changes [3].

Th Insulin was review discusses the effects of calorie restriction (CR) through different diets—classic calorie restriction vs. calorie restriction with ketosis-inducing measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay and IR was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). Insulin response was calculated at the ratio of change in plasma insulin from baseline to 30 min to the change in plasma glucose over the same time. Insulin sensitivity was calculated as 1/fasting insulin. Fasting and area under the curve (AUC) insulin were both significantly reduced in the CR group as compared with the AL group at 1 and 2 years. Fasting glucose was significantly reduced by CR at year 1, but not at year 2. CR improved insulin sensitivity: HOMA-IR reduced; insulin response increased (at 2 years only); insulin sensitivity index increased. No significant reduction in the AUC-glucose was observed. Usually, glucose plasma concentrations are within the normal, non-diagnostic range, until two to five years before the diagnosis of T2DM when a rapid deterioration of insulin secretion and a parallel elevation of glycemia occur [3]. Contrarily, IR prediects—in insulin levels the risk of T2DM as early as 30 years before diagnosis. In the CALERIE-2 trial, glucose tolerance did not significantly change at a point in the development of diabetes where it may still be in the normal range. However, insulin resistance (IR) sensitivity greatly increased, while plasma fasting glucose and glucose metabolism, associated with metabolic-stimulated insulin concentration reduced. These findings suggest the potential for the significant cardiovascular advantage of practicing moderate CR in young and middle-aged healthy individuals, and possible long-term population health benefits [3].

Regardindg safety concerns with long-term CR in non-obese health spay individuals, a previous study [15] con.cluded The focus will be on healthy non-obese individuals.

Fthat two-years of CR at levels achieved in CALERIE are safe and well-tolerated. No deaths were observed in the study. Participants in the CR group reported more non-serious events regarding the reproductive system and skin disorders, than participants in the control gr the research of bibliography on PubMed and SciELO doup, but none of the differences was statistically significant. In the CR group, the incidence of adverse events was statically higher in normal weight than in overweight participants, regarding nervous, musculoskeletal, and reproductive disorders [15]. However, the number of partabases, a combination of the following micipants was small, so no definitive inferences about the effects of body mass index (BMI) could be made. Close monitoring for excessive bone loss and anemia is important. Bone mass measurement (BMD) loss by the CR group was unclear. CR group participants had an increased risk of significant decreases in hematocrit [15]. It must be rememberedical that CR must be practiced as a CR diet without malnutrition.

BIOSPHERE 2 subject headings (MeSH) was used: ctudy was an observational study in which eight members of a crew faced a forced 29% CR for 18 months, and they experienced marked reductions in levels of insulin and glucose concentrations (91.9 to 73.9 mg/dL). CRON Study was also an observational study in which multiple members of the Calorie rRestriction, fasting mimicking diets, f Society followed a regimen of self-imposed CR (1800 kcal/d) with optimal nutrition for an average of 15 years. Fasting, ketog glucose and insulin were remarkably low, and insulin sensitivity was improved [6].

Several mechanic diet,sms have been proposed to explain the effects of CR on glucose metabolic syndrome,sm. Reduced energy intake reduces pancreatic cell apoptosis. Improved insulin resistance, healthy aging, performance.

Tsensitivity increases the expression of SIRT-1, which is probably linked to hepatic glucogenic/glycolytic pathways, increasing hepatic glucose output. SIRT-1 also enhances endothelial reasons behind the cnitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity, whose increase is in turn related to the reduction of oxidative stress in endothelial cells caused by CR [8]. CR increases the levels oice of “f adiponectin in humans, which is inversely related to body weight, adiposity, and IR. Adiponectin modulates insulin resistance” as a health span indiactivity and also reduces insulin levels and beta-cell dysfunction. CR also positively modulates the secretion of adipocyte cytokines by decreasing the secretion of proinflammatory mediators and the development of a pro-inflammatory phenotype in white adipose tissue [8].

A three-week non-controlled CR intervention with ator are the well-esta 40% energy deficit in 41 non-obese adults stratified the subjects into two enterotypes, according to their baseline microbial composition, in Bacteroides subjects and Prevotella subjects [16]. Prevotella subjects exhibited a significantly hished roles of IR as a powerfugher BMI loss ratio than Bacteroides subjects, showing that subjects with different baseline enterotypes can respond differently to CR diet and that pre-intervention gut microbial composition could well predict CR-induced BMI loss. No changes in gut microbial composition were observed by the end of the study [16].

A 2012 review article risk factor for CNCD—assembles the evidence regarding the beneficial effect of CR on age-related cardiovascular disease [17]. Tyhe expe 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), coronarylained mechanisms for reduced atherosclerosis and improved insulin sensitivity are: decreases the accumulation of oxidized lipids and reduces oxidative stress in the arterial wall; decreases inflammation, heart disease, so (i.e., TNF-α, interleukin 6 (IL-6), CRP); decreases blood glucose and lipids (i.e., triglycerides (TG), cholesterol) [17]. CR can significantly improve forms of cancer, and others. IR predicts the risk of developing T2DM as early as thirty years before diagnosis. Moreover, IR and the compensatory hheart rate variability and arterial stiffness and dilatation, normalizing BP values. BP improvement may be related to insulin sensitivity and the increase in nitric oxide (NO) production. By increasing insulin sensibility, CR improves BP through multiple mechanisms. Hyperinsulinemia leads to peripheral vasoconstriction, increases the reabsorption of sodium by the kidney, stimulates the renin-angiotensin II axis, increases smooth muscle hypertrophy, and stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, leading to increased BP. Hyperinsulinemia also increases the production of endothelin 1, which enhances BP. Hyperinsulinemia play a roand IR lead to a dysfunctional inositol 3-kinase-dependent signaling pathway, decreasing NO production [18].

2.3. Calorie Restriction, Interactions between Insulin and Exercise

Prediabetes starts as a skeletal in the pathogenesis ofmuscle, liver, and/or adipose tissue IR, that in time promotes oversecretion of insulin and results in pancreatic exhaustion with hypertension, inhibition of figlycemia. Skeletal muscle IR is primarily responsible for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; 2 h postprandial glucose > 140 mg/dL) while hepatic IR is mainly responsible for impaired fasting glucose (IFG; fasting plasma glucose > 100 mg/dL) [19]. Prediabetic individuals with IFG+IGT have lowerinolysis, and stimulation of vas insulin sensitivity responses to high-volume/high-intensity exercise when compared to IFG or IGT alone. Thus, a recent study hypothesized that CR could improve the insulin sensitivity response to exercise in prediabetic individuals [19]. The energy deficuit that follows immediatelar smooth muscle proliferation and migy after exercise has an important role in the benefits of exercise on insulin sensitivity. Postprandial insulin levels decrease more when the energy deficit is maintained after exercise, compared to when calories are restored by ingestion. This is observed in short-duration studies as well as in long-duration, all leading to atherosclerosis [3]. studies (several months to 1 year). Increased fasting fat oxidation after exercise with calorie and/or carbohydrate restriction was observed, suggesting that mitochondrial reliance on fat may contribute to improved insulin sensitivity. Other studies with healthy Iinsulin also plays a pivotal role idividuals and individuals with obesity and/or T2DM demonstrated that when after exercise the calorie ingestion compensates the calories that were spent, insulin sensitivity does not statistically improve, reinforcing the idea that the effect of exercise on insulin sensitivity is due to the calorie deficit [19][20][21]. Hence, other common diseases thaCR associated with exercise can have a greater impact on insulin sensitivity than exercise alone.

A 5-month affect the quality of life of individuals, such as acne and polycystic ovary syndrome [4]randomized controlled trial in 126 older (>65 years) overweight and obese men and women also studied the efficacy of adding CR for weight loss to resistance training (RT) on MS. Compared to RT, RT+CR resulted in a decrease in body mass, VLDL cholesterol, TG, and systolic and diastolic pressures. Yet, there was no significant difference between groups on insulin sensitivity, determined by HOMA-IR. These results are aligned with previous studies with similar individuals but go against studies done with younger individuals [22].

2. Calorie Restriction, Definition and Effects

Calorie restriction (CR) is a nutritional intervention of reduced energy intake of about 25–30% without lack of essential nutrients [1], with a well-established role to extend health span and lifespan in rodent and primate models. Throughout the literature, the term CR is often used interchangeably with dietary restriction (DR). However, CR is a partial example of DR as DR protocols include CR, reduction of specific macronutrients or change in the ratio of them as well as other different feeding interventions, such as ketosis-inducing diets [1].
Observational and randomized clinical trials denote that some of the mechanisms that lead to these improvements in animal models can also be seen in humans [5,6]. In particular, moderate CR in humans enhances multiple metabolic and hormonal factors that are implicated in the pathogenesis of age-associated metabolic alterations, cancer and others, which are leading causes of morbidity, disability, and mortality. Furthermore, moderate CR can prevent and reverse the harmful effects of the accumulation of excessive body fat and obesity, T2DM, dyslipidemia, hypertension, all factors included in metabolic syndrome (MS) [5,6]. IR is one of the most significant factors implicated in these results.

2.1. Calorie Restriction, Effects on Lifespan and Health Span

Healthy aging refers to the delay of molecular and cellular decline for the longest length of the lifespan, as aging is characterized by the accumulation of molecular and cellular damage, leading to structural and functional aberrancies in cells and tissues [7]. CR is the most robust intervention known to increase maximal lifespan and health span. The four most important CR-induced antiaging mechanisms are thought to be: neuroendocrine system adaptations, prevention of inflammation, hormetic response, and protection against oxidative stress damage [5]. Regarding neuroendocrine system adaptations, important involved factors are increased insulin sensitivity, reduced levels of anabolic hormones (e.g., insulin, testosterone, leptin), reduced levels of hormones that regulate thermogenesis and cellular metabolism (e.g., triiodothyronine, norepinephrine), and increased levels of hormones that suppress inflammation (e.g., cortisol, adiponectin, ghrelin) [5]. In rodents, CR prevents or delays a wide range of CNCD, such as cancer, atherosclerosis, diabetes, cardiomyopathy, kidney disease, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases [5].
Hormesis is another proposed factor to mediate the antiaging effects of chronic CR. Hormesis is defined as a beneficial biological process by which a low-intensity stressor increases resistance to another more intense stressor, by provoking a survival response in the organism, helping it to endure adversity by activating longevity pathways [5]. This theory can explain why CR animals are more resistant to a wide range of stresses (e.g., surgery, radiation, acute inflammation, exposure to heat, and oxidative stress) [5].
CR has also been shown to enhance DNA repair systems, promote the removal of damaged proteins and oxidized lipids, and upregulate endogenous enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidative defense mechanisms [5]. On the cellular level, CR triggers processes such as activation of cellular stress response elements, improved autophagy and modification of apoptosis [8]. CR reduces fasting insulin levels, several growth factors, profibrotic molecules, and cytokines, including serum concentration of platelet derived growth-factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor α (TGF-α), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) [5].
Biological molecular pathways that have the dual ability to sense nutrients and/or energy levels while also regulating cellular processes like epigenomic remodeling, gene expression, protein activity, and organelle integrity—i.e., mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 signaling (ISS), AMP-activated protein Kinase (AMPK), sirtuins (SIRT)—each play a key role in aging [7]. Alongside, spontaneous or induced genetic alterations on genes encoding proteins of the IIS pathway can extend maximal lifespan in animal models, and that CR decreases serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentration by approximately 40% in rodents [5]. Genetic variants and/or combinations of small-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human components of the IIS pathway correlate with low IGF-1 plasma levels in centenarians [7].
Nonetheless, a recent study with modified rodents lacking mTORC2 adipocyte activity questions the idea that improved insulin sensitivity is the mechanism through which CR increases health span and lifespan. Rodents without mTORC2 adipocyte activity, which is needed for the improvement of insulin sensibility in CR, had displayed an increase in their health and lifespan when exposed to CR [9].
Studies with non-human primates are also contributing to support the benefits of CR. One investigation shows how 30% CR drastically reduces the incidence of glucose intolerance, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in primates [10,11]. Another study showed that CR slowed down age-related sarcopenia, hearing loss, and brain atrophy in several subcortical regions [10,11]. In Rhesus monkeys, young-onset CR reduces the risk of developing and dying of cardiovascular diseases by at least 50% [3].
Some insights about the effects of CR without malnutrition in humans can be taken out of population studies. During World War 1, the Danish population was forced to reduce food consumption for 2 years, but with adequate consumption of whole-grain cereals, vegetables, and milk, which led to a 34% reduction in death rates. During World War 2, Oslo citizens also underwent a forced 20% CR without malnutrition for 4 years, and in this time, mortality dropped by 30% compared to the pre-war level [6].
There is evidence that CR exerts a powerful anti-inflammatory effect in humans, protecting against atherosclerotic risk factors, and resulting in less carotid intima-media thickening, improved left ventricular diastolic function, and increased beneficial heart rate variability [12,13]. Various metabolic and neuroendocrine mechanisms are responsible for this CR-mediated anti-inflammatory effect, including low adiposity and reduced secretion of proinflammatory adipokines and cytokines, reduced plasma glucose and advanced glycation end-product concentrations, increased cortisol and ghrelin production, and increased parasympathetic tone [14].
Despite there is no evidence at the moment to support the idea that long-term CR with adequate nutrition extends maximal lifespan in humans, it is known that long-term CR leads to metabolic and hormonal changes seen in rodents, including reduced body temperature and resting metabolic rate, reduced markers of oxidative stress and reduced fasting insulin levels [5].

2.2. Calorie Restriction and the Effects on Insulin Sensitivity

A recent multicenter randomized control trial, CALERIE 2 [3], evaluated the cardiometabolic risk factor responses to CR diet for 2 years in 220 young and middle-aged (21 to 50 years), healthy non-obese men and women. Participants were randomized to a 25% CR group or an ad libitum (AL) control group. Over the 2 years, the CR group achieved 11.9% CR and a sustained 10% weight loss, of which 71% was a fat mass loss. CR caused a significant and persistent reduction of all measured cardiometabolic risk factors, including Low-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), total cholesterol to High-density Lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP). Additionally, CR resulted in a significant improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity index, and MS score relative to control. A secondary analysis revealed the responses to be robust after controlling for relative weight loss changes [3]. Insulin was measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay and IR was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). Insulin response was calculated at the ratio of change in plasma insulin from baseline to 30 min to the change in plasma glucose over the same time. Insulin sensitivity was calculated as 1/fasting insulin. Fasting and area under the curve (AUC) insulin were both significantly reduced in the CR group as compared with the AL group at 1 and 2 years. Fasting glucose was significantly reduced by CR at year 1, but not at year 2. CR improved insulin sensitivity: HOMA-IR reduced; insulin response increased (at 2 years only); insulin sensitivity index increased. No significant reduction in the AUC-glucose was observed. Usually, glucose plasma concentrations are within the normal, non-diagnostic range, until two to five years before the diagnosis of T2DM when a rapid deterioration of insulin secretion and a parallel elevation of glycemia occur [3]. Contrarily, IR predicts the risk of T2DM as early as 30 years before diagnosis. In the CALERIE-2 trial, glucose tolerance did not significantly change at a point in the development of diabetes where it may still be in the normal range. However, insulin sensitivity greatly increased, while plasma fasting glucose and glucose-stimulated insulin concentration reduced. These findings suggest the potential for the significant cardiovascular advantage of practicing moderate CR in young and middle-aged healthy individuals, and possible long-term population health benefits [3].
Regarding safety concerns with long-term CR in non-obese healthy individuals, a previous study [15] concluded that two-years of CR at levels achieved in CALERIE are safe and well-tolerated. No deaths were observed in the study. Participants in the CR group reported more non-serious events regarding the reproductive system and skin disorders, than participants in the control group, but none of the differences was statistically significant. In the CR group, the incidence of adverse events was statically higher in normal weight than in overweight participants, regarding nervous, musculoskeletal, and reproductive disorders [15]. However, the number of participants was small, so no definitive inferences about the effects of body mass index (BMI) could be made. Close monitoring for excessive bone loss and anemia is important. Bone mass measurement (BMD) loss by the CR group was unclear. CR group participants had an increased risk of significant decreases in hematocrit [15]. It must be remembered that CR must be practiced as a CR diet without malnutrition.
BIOSPHERE 2 study was an observational study in which eight members of a crew faced a forced 29% CR for 18 months, and they experienced marked reductions in levels of insulin and glucose concentrations (91.9 to 73.9 mg/dL). CRON Study was also an observational study in which multiple members of the Calorie Restriction Society followed a regimen of self-imposed CR (1800 kcal/d) with optimal nutrition for an average of 15 years. Fasting glucose and insulin were remarkably low, and insulin sensitivity was improved [6].
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effects of CR on glucose metabolism. Reduced energy intake reduces pancreatic cell apoptosis. Improved insulin sensitivity increases the expression of SIRT-1, which is probably linked to hepatic glucogenic/glycolytic pathways, increasing hepatic glucose output. SIRT-1 also enhances endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity, whose increase is in turn related to the reduction of oxidative stress in endothelial cells caused by CR [8]. CR increases the levels of adiponectin in humans, which is inversely related to body weight, adiposity, and IR. Adiponectin modulates insulin activity and also reduces insulin levels and beta-cell dysfunction. CR also positively modulates the secretion of adipocyte cytokines by decreasing the secretion of proinflammatory mediators and the development of a pro-inflammatory phenotype in white adipose tissue [8].
A three-week non-controlled CR intervention with a 40% energy deficit in 41 non-obese adults stratified the subjects into two enterotypes, according to their baseline microbial composition, in Bacteroides subjects and Prevotella subjects [16]. Prevotella subjects exhibited a significantly higher BMI loss ratio than Bacteroides subjects, showing that subjects with different baseline enterotypes can respond differently to CR diet and that pre-intervention gut microbial composition could well predict CR-induced BMI loss. No changes in gut microbial composition were observed by the end of the study [16].
A 2012 review article assembles the evidence regarding the beneficial effect of CR on age-related cardiovascular disease [17]. The explained mechanisms for reduced atherosclerosis and improved insulin sensitivity are: decreases the accumulation of oxidized lipids and reduces oxidative stress in the arterial wall; decreases inflammation (i.e., TNF-α, interleukin 6 (IL-6), CRP); decreases blood glucose and lipids (i.e., triglycerides (TG), cholesterol) [17]. CR can significantly improve heart rate variability and arterial stiffness and dilatation, normalizing BP values. BP improvement may be related to insulin sensitivity and the increase in nitric oxide (NO) production. By increasing insulin sensibility, CR improves BP through multiple mechanisms. Hyperinsulinemia leads to peripheral vasoconstriction, increases the reabsorption of sodium by the kidney, stimulates the renin-angiotensin II axis, increases smooth muscle hypertrophy, and stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, leading to increased BP. Hyperinsulinemia also increases the production of endothelin 1, which enhances BP. Hyperinsulinemia and IR lead to a dysfunctional inositol 3-kinase-dependent signaling pathway, decreasing NO production [18].

2.3. Calorie Restriction, Interactions between Insulin and Exercise

Prediabetes starts as a skeletal muscle, liver, and/or adipose tissue IR, that in time promotes oversecretion of insulin and results in pancreatic exhaustion with hyperglycemia. Skeletal muscle IR is primarily responsible for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; 2 h postprandial glucose > 140 mg/dL) while hepatic IR is mainly responsible for impaired fasting glucose (IFG; fasting plasma glucose > 100 mg/dL) [19]. Prediabetic individuals with IFG+IGT have lower insulin sensitivity responses to high-volume/high-intensity exercise when compared to IFG or IGT alone. Thus, a recent study hypothesized that CR could improve the insulin sensitivity response to exercise in prediabetic individuals [19]. The energy deficit that follows immediately after exercise has an important role in the benefits of exercise on insulin sensitivity. Postprandial insulin levels decrease more when the energy deficit is maintained after exercise, compared to when calories are restored by ingestion. This is observed in short-duration studies as well as in long-duration studies (several months to 1 year). Increased fasting fat oxidation after exercise with calorie and/or carbohydrate restriction was observed, suggesting that mitochondrial reliance on fat may contribute to improved insulin sensitivity. Other studies with healthy individuals and individuals with obesity and/or T2DM demonstrated that when after exercise the calorie ingestion compensates the calories that were spent, insulin sensitivity does not statistically improve, reinforcing the idea that the effect of exercise on insulin sensitivity is due to the calorie deficit [19,20,21]. Hence, CR associated with exercise can have a greater impact on insulin sensitivity than exercise alone.
A 5-month randomized controlled trial in 126 older (>65 years) overweight and obese men and women also studied the efficacy of adding CR for weight loss to resistance training (RT) on MS. Compared to RT, RT+CR resulted in a decrease in body mass, VLDL cholesterol, TG, and systolic and diastolic pressures. Yet, there was no significant difference between groups on insulin sensitivity, determined by HOMA-IR. These results are aligned with previous studies with similar individuals but go against studies done with younger individuals [22].

References

  1. Pignatti, C.; D’Adamo, S.; Stefanelli, C.; Flamigni, F.; Cetrullo, S. Nutrients and Pathways that Regulate Health Span and Life Span. Geriatrics 2020, 5, 95.
  2. Tappia, P.S.; Blewett, H. Nutrition and Cardiovascular Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2284.
  3. Kraus, W.E.; Bhapkar, M.; Huffman, K.M.; Pieper, C.F.; Krupa Das, S.; Redman, L.M.; Villareal, D.T.; Rochon, J.; Roberts, S.B.; Ravussin, E.; et al. 2 years of calorie restriction and cardiometabolic risk (CALERIE): Exploratory outcomes of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 673–683.
  4. Paoli, A.; Rubini, A.; Volek, J.; Grimaldi, K. Beyond weight loss a review of the therapeutic uses of VLCKD.pdf. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 67.
  5. Fontana, L. The scientific basis of caloric restriction leading to longer life. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2009, 25, 144–150.
  6. Redman, L.M.; Fontana, L. Calorie restriction in humans: An update. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017.
  7. Carmona, J.J.; Michan, S. Biology of Healthy Aging and Longevity. Rev. Investig. Clin. 2016, 68, 7–16.
  8. Golbidi, S.; Daiber, A.; Korac, B.; Li, H.; Essop, M.F.; Laher, I. Health Benefits of Fasting and Caloric Restriction. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017, 17, 123.
  9. Yu, D.; Tomasiewicz, J.L.; Yang, S.E.; Miller, B.R.; Wakai, M.H.; Sherman, D.S.; Cummings, N.E.; Baar, E.L.; Brinkman, J.A.; Syed, F.A.; et al. Calorie-Restriction-Induced Insulin Sensitivity Is Mediated by Adipose mTORC2 and Not Required for Lifespan Extension. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 236–248.e3.
  10. Colman, R.J.; Beasley, T.M.; Kemnitz, J.W.; Johnson, S.C.; Weindruch, R.; Anderson, R.M. Caloric restriction reduces age-related and all-cause mortality in rhesus monkeys. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3557.
  11. Colman, R.J.; Anderson, R.M.; Johnson, S.C.; Kastman, E.K.; Kosmatka, K.J.; Beasley, T.M.; Allison, D.B.; Cruzen, C.; Simmons, H.A.; Kemnitz, J.W.; et al. Caloric Restriction Delays Disease Onset and Mortality in Rhesus Monkeys. Science 2009, 325, 201–204.
  12. Fontana, L.; Meyer, T.; Klein, S.; Holloszy, J. Long-term calorie restriction is highly effective in reducing the risk for atherosclerosis in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004.
  13. Fontana, L.; Villareal, D.T.; Weiss, E.; Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE Group. Calorie restriction or exercise: Effects on coronary heart disease risk factors. A randomized, controlled trial. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007.
  14. Fontana, L. Neuroendocrine factors in the regulation of inflammation: Excessive adiposity and calorie restriction. Exp. Gerontol. 2008, 44, 41–45.
  15. CALERIE Study Group; Romashkan, S.V.; Das, S.K.; Villareal, D.T.; Ravussin, E.; Redman, L.M.; Rochon, J.; Bhapkar, M.; Kraus, W.E. Safety of two-year caloric restriction in non-obese healthy individuals. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 19124–19133.
  16. Zou, H.; Wang, D.; Ren, H.; Cai, K.; Chen, P.; Fang, C.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; et al. Effect of Caloric Restriction on BMI, Gut Microbiota, and Blood Amino Acid Levels in Non-Obese Adults. Nutrients 2020, 12, 631.
  17. Sung, M.M.Y.; Dyck, J.R.B. Age-related cardiovascular disease and the beneficial effects of calorie restriction. Heart Fail. Rev. 2012, 17, 707–719.
  18. Rachel, N.; Michael, H. Caloric Restriction and Its Effect on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate Variability and Arterial Stiffness and Dilatation: A Review of the Evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 751.
  19. Gaitan, J.M.; Weltman, A.; Malin, S.K. Enhancing Exercise Responsiveness across Prediabetes Phenotypes by Targeting Insulin Sensitivity with Nutrition. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2017, 1–8.
  20. Yan, H.; Prista, A.; Ranadive, S.M.; Damasceno, A.; Caupers, P.; Kanaley, J.A.; Fernhall, B. Effect of Aerobic Training on Glucose Control and Blood Pressure in T2DDM East African Males. ISRN Endocrinol. 2014, 2014, 1–6.
  21. Arad, A.D.; DiMenna, F.J.; Thomas, N.; Tamis-Holland, J.; Weil, R.; Geliebter, A.; Albu, J.B. High-intensity interval training without weight loss improves exercise but not basal or insulin-induced metabolism in overweight/obese African American women. J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 119, 352–362.
  22. Normandin, E.; Chmelo, E.; Lyles, M.F.; Marsh, A.P.; Nicklas, B.J. Effect of Resistance Training and Caloric Restriction on the Metabolic Syndrome. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2017, 49, 413–419.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback