Materials Science, Glasses: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 8 by Catherine Yang and Version 7 by Michael I. Ojovan.

Glasses are solid amorphous materials which transform into liquids upon heating through the glass transition. 

  • Glasses

Glasses are solid amorphous materials which transform into liquids upon heating through the glass transition. The International Commission on Glass defines glass as a state of matter, usually produced when a viscous molten material is cooled rapidly to below its glass transition temperature, with insufficient time for a regular crystal lattice to form

[1]

. The

solid-like

behaviour of glasses is separated from the

liquid-like

behaviour at higher temperatures by the glass transition temperature, T

g

[2]

. The IUPAC Compendium on Chemical Terminology defines glass transition as a second order transition in which a supercooled melt yields, on cooling, a glassy structure

[3]

. It states that below the glass-transition temperature the physical properties of glasses vary in a manner similar to those of the crystalline phase. Moreover, it is deemed that the bonding structure of glasses has the same symmetry signature in terms of Hausdorff-Besikovitch dimensionality of chemical bonds as for the crystalline materials

[4]

Introduction

1. Introduction

Glass is one of the most ancient of all materials known and used by mankind. The natural glass, obsidian, was first used by man thousands of years ago to form knives, arrow tips and jewellery. Manmade glass objects from Mesopotamia have been dated as early as 4,500 BC and from Egypt from 3,000 BC. The high chemical resistance of glass allows it to remain stable in corrosive environments for many thousands and even millions of years. Several glasses are found in nature such as obsidians (volcanic glasses), fulgarites (formed by lightning strikes), tektites found on land in Australasia and associated microtektites from the bottom of the Indian Ocean, moldavites from central Europe, and Libyan Desert glass from western Egypt. Some of these glasses have been in the natural environment for about 300 million years with low alteration rates of less than a millimetre per one million years. For example, the natural glass obsidian is formed when lava erupts from volcanoes and cools rapidly without sufficient time for crystal growth. The composition of a typical California obsidian is (wt%) 75SiO

2

13.5Al

2

O 1.6FeO/Fe

2

O

3

1.4CaO 4.3Na

2

O 4.5K

2

O 0.7MnO. Obsidian glass edges can be extremely sharp reaching almost molecular thinness and was known for its ancient use as knives and projectile tips. Tektites are other natural glasses, typically up to a few centimetres in size, which have most probably been formed by the impact of large meteorites on Earth's surface which melted the Earth's surface material resulting on cooling in glass. The age of tektites found in Czech Republic, moldavites of typical composition (75-80)SiO

2

(9-12)Al

2

O (1-3)FeO/Fe

2

O

3

(2-3)CaO 0.3Na

2

O 3.5K

2

O, is assessed to be ~15 million years

[5]

Glass formation (vitrification)

2. Glass formation (vitrification)

Glasses are most frequently produced by a melt cooling below its glass transition temperature sufficiently fast to avoid formation of crystalline phases. Glass-forming materials such as dioxides do not require very fast cooling whereas materials prone to crystallization such as metals require a very fast cooling (quenching), for example the first metallic glasses had to be cooled extremely rapidly with rates of the order of 10

6

K/s to avoid crystallization. Glasses can be formed by several methods

[6]

:

  • Melt quenching,
  • Physical vapour deposition,
  • Solid state reactions (thermo- and mechanochemical methods),
  • Liquid state reactions (sol-gel method),
  • Irradiation of crystalline solids (radiation amorphization),
  • Under action of high pressures (pressure amorphization).

Glass formation from melts (vitrification) is a matter of bypassing crystallization and formation of glass is easier in more complex systems

[7]

. Most glasses used in commerce are oxide glasses (Table 1).

Table 1.

Commercial oxide glass compositions

[6].

.

3. Glass transition temperature

Crystalline materials melt at well defined melting temperatures Tm whereas amorphous materials transform from the glassy (solid) state to the molten (liquid) state at the glass transition temperatures Tg which play the role of melting temperatures of non-crystalline solids. The liquid-glass transition is accompanied by significant changes in physical properties, e.g. glasses are brittle, thus changes should occur at the molecular level although the material at molecular scale is topologically disordered both in liquid and glassy states. Namely rearrangements that occur in an amorphous material at the glass transition temperature cause characteristic discontinuities of derivative thermodynamic parameters such as the coefficient of thermal expansion or the specific heat[8]. Figure 1 shows the main characteristics of glass–liquid transition that demonstrate the thermodynamic origin and structural changes behind transformation:

(a) The temperature (T) dependences of the isobaric heat capacity (Cp) by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) during the heating of a glass at a typical rate of 10 K/min. The glass−liquid transition during upscan is always featured by a Cp jump, whereas the vitrification (liquid−glass transition) on cooling during downscan is reflected by a gradual Cp drop[9].

(b) The temperature dependence of the first sharp diffraction minimum (FSDM) value of pair-distribution function (PDFmin) on the scattering of incident neutron or X-rays indicating that at the Tg there is a substantial change of slope due to structural changes at the glass transition[10].

(c) The temperature dependence of the first temperature differential of FSDM value d(PDFmin)/dT indicating that at the Tg, there is a stepwise change of slope due to structural changes at the glass transition[10].

Glass transition temperature

(d) The temperature dependence of the Hausdorff–Besicovitch dimen-sion D=dimH(broken bonds) of the set of broken chemical bonds at the glass transition changes suddenly as change the material properties. The set of broken bonds termed configurons has D = 0 below the Tg, and D = 2.55 ± 0.05 above it[11].

Crystalline   materials melt at well defined melting temperatures

Fig. 1. The main characteristics of glass–liquid transition that demonstrate the thermodynamic origin and structural changes behind transformation. (a) The temperature (T) dependences of the isobaric heat capacity (Cp) by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). (b) The temperature dependence of the first sharp diffraction minimum (FSDM) value of pair-distribution function (PDFmin) on the scattering of incident neutron or X-rays. (c) The temperature dependence of the first temperature differential of FSDM value d(PDFmin)/dT. (d) The temperature dependence of the Hausdorff–Besicovitch dimension D=dimH(broken bonds) of the set of broken chemical bonds.

The discontinuities allow to detect the Tg or, accounting for cooling rate dependences, - the glass transition interval where a supercooled liquid transforms to a glass[12]. Vitrification manifests itself as a second-order phase transition however its description in terms of the Landau theory is difficult as there is no clarity about the order parameter describing this transition. Although similar to a second order phase transformation the glass-liquid transition is a kinetically-controlled phenomenon which exhibits a range of Tg depending on the cooling rate with maximal Tg at highest rates of cooling.

The attention of the most of researchers in the last decades has been focused on relaxation aspects of the liquid–glass transition rather than the structure[13]. Emphasis in these works is placed on glass nonergodicity and it is considered that glass is a material characterized by large Deborah numbers for which the relaxation time is much longer than the observation time taken typically as 102 s. The systems are commonly assumed to be ergodic at temperatures T>Tg, whereas the systems are completely frozen with respect to primary relaxation at T<Tg. As on cooling the viscosities of glass-forming liquids continuously increase and achieve very high values, the liquid-glass transition is often regarded as a transition for practical purposes rather than a thermodynamic phase transition. By general agreement it is considered that a liquid on being cooled becomes practically a glass when the viscosity equals 1012 Pa×s (1013 poise) or where the relaxation time is 102 s. There is not any phase transformation at this practical purpose (relaxation) glass transition temperature which is found from the viscosity-temperature relationship:

However, the definition of a glass as an amorphous material at viscosities above 1012 Pa×s is inconsistent. First, the viscosity of amorphous materials is a continuous function of temperature. Second, the viscosity is NOT necessarily 1012 Pa×s at Tg. Although many glassy systems have indeed the viscosity close to 1012 Pa×s on the logarithmic scale, numerically the viscosity is far away from this value e.g. in many cases being ten, hundred and even thousand times different from it. Fig. 2 shows the viscosity of salol (C16H16N2O3) demonstrating that its viscosity at the glass transition temperature is more than two orders of magnitude below 1012 Pa×s[14].

Fig. 2. The viscosity of vitreous and molten salol. The theoretical curve was calculated using the Sheffield equation. The inset shows the viscosities of other amorphous materials at Tg.

Even though a glass like a liquid has a topologically disordered structure, at the same time, it has elastic properties of an isotropic solid. Changes occur at the molecular level on vitrification although the material is topologically disordered both in liquid and glassy states. The drastic changes of materials properties at the glass transition make the structural changes of a vitrifying liquid extremely difficult to reveal directly. This became possible on utilizing sophisticated atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques[15], analysis of fifth-order susceptibility[16], and analysis of X-ray pair distribution function[10]. The structural difference between crystals, glasses and melts is schematically explained by Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Schematic of bonding systems of crystals, glasses, and melts. The black points and circles represent atoms, black segments – chemical bonds, and segments crossed by red dashes – broken bonds termed configurons. These form percolation clusters in liquids revealing structural changes which occur at glass transition.

Tm whereas amorphous materials transform from the glassy (solid) state to the molten (liquid) state at the glass transition temperatures Tg whi struch play the role of melting temperatures of non-crystalline solids. The liquid-glass transition is accompanied by significant changes in physical properties, e.g. glasses are brittle, thus changes should occur at the molecular level although the material at molecular scale is topologically disordered both in liquid ural difference between crystals and glassy states. Namely rearrangements that occur in an amorphous material at the glass transition temperature cause characteristic discontinuities of derivative thermodynamic parameters such as the coefficient of thermal expansion or the specific heat[8]. Figure 1 shes is obvious both fows the main characteristics of glass–liquid transition that demonstrate the thermodynamic origin and structural changes behind transformation:

(a) atoms and bonds The temperature (T) dependences of the isobaric heat capacity (Cp) by differencrystial scanning calorimetry (DSC) during the heating of a glass at a typical rate of 10 K/min. The glass−liquid transition during upscan is always featured by a Cp jump, s are regular structures whereas the vitrification (liquid−glass transition) on cooling during downscan is reflected by a gradual Cp drop[9].

(b) The glasses are temperature dependence of the first sharp diffraction minimum (FSDM) value of pair-distribution function (PDFmin) on the scatterinpolog of incident neutron or X-rays indicating that at the Tg there ically dis a substantial change of slope due to structural changes at the glass transition[10]rdered.

(c) The temperature dependence of the first temperature diifferential of FSDM value d(PDFmin)/dT indicating that at the Tg, therbe is a stepwise change of slope due to structural changes at the glass transition[10].

(ween glasses and) The temperature dependence of the Hausdorff–Besicovitch dimen-sion D=dimH(bmelts are roken bonds) of the set of broken chemical bonds at the glass transition changes suddenly as change the material properties. The set of broken bonds termed configurons has D = 0 below the Tg, and D = 2.55 ± 0.05 above it[11].

    

Fig. 1. The main characteristics of vealed only for bonds: both glass–liquid tranesition that demonstrate the thermodynamic origin and structural changes behind transformation. (a) The temperature (T) dependences of the isobaric heat capacity (Cp) by and liquids are disordifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC). (b) The temperature dependence of the first sharp diffraction minimum (FSDM) value of pair-distribution function (PDFmin) on the scatterind however g of incident neutron or X-rlays. (c) The temperature dependence of the first temperature differential of FSDM value d(PDFmin)/dT. (d) Tsses he temperature dependence of the Hausdorff–Besicovitch dimension D=dimH(ve broken bonds) of the set of broken chemical bonds.

Thenly as discpontinuities allow to detect the Tg or, accounting int-like defor cooling rate dependences, - the glass transition interval where a supercooled liquid transforms to a glass[12]. Vcts whereas in litrifquication manifests itself as a second-order phase transition however its description in terms of the Landau theory is difficult as there is no clarity about the order parameter describing this transition. Although similar to a second order phase transformation the glass-liquid transition is a kinetically-controlled phenomenon which exhibits a range of Tg depending on the ds they form macroscopical percooling rate with maximal Tg at highest rates of cooliating.

The attention of the most of researchers in the last decades has been focused on relaxation aspects of tructures.

The liquid–glass transition rather than the structutemperature[13]. Emphasis in these works is placed on glass nonergodicity and it is considered that glass is a material characterized by large Deborah numbers for which the relaxation time is much longer than the observation time taken typically as 102 s. Thn the configuron pe systems are commonly assumed to be ergodic at temperatures T>Tg, whereas the systems are ccolatiompletely frozen with respect to primary relaxation at T<Tg. Astheory (CPT) on cooling the viscosities of glass-forming liquids continuously increase and achieve very high values, the liquid-glass transit transition is often regarded as a transition for practical purposes rather than a thermodynamic p given by:

whase transition. By general agreement it isre Hd considered that a liquid on being cooled becomesnd Sd practically a glass when the viscosity equals 1012 Pa×s (1013 poise) or where the relaxation time is 102 s. T the enthere is not any phase transformation at this practical purpose (relaxation) glass transition temperature which is found from the viscosity-temperature relationship:

However, the lpy andefinition of a glass as an amorphous material at viscosities above 1012 Pa×s is ienconsistent. First, the viscosity of amorphous materials is a continuous function of temperature. Second, the viscosity is NOT necessarily 1012 Pa×s at Tg. Althropy of configuron (brough many glassy systems havke indeed the viscosity close to 1012 Pa×s on bond) the logarithmic scale, numerically the viscosity is far away from this value e.g. in many cases being ten, hundred and even thousand times diformation, fferentc from it. Fig. 2 shows the viscosity of salol (C16H16N2O3) dpemonstrating that its viscosity at the glass transition temperature is more than two orders of magnitude below 1012 Pa×s[14].

Fig. 2. Tcolation threshe viscosity of vitreous and molten salol. The theoretical curve was calculated using the Sheffield equation. The inset shows the viscosities of other amorphous materials at Tg.

Evld which deten though a glass like a liquid has a topologically disordered structure, at the same time, it has elastic properties of an isotropic solid. Changes occur at the molecular level on vitrification although the material is topologically disordered both in liquid and glassy states. The drastic changes of materials properties at the glass transition make the structural changes of a vitrifying liquid extremely difficult to reveal directly. This became possible on utilizing sophisticated atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques[15],mines when the first time a percolation analysis of fifth-order susceptibility[16], and analysis of X-ray pair distriblution function[10]. The structural difference between crystals, glasses and melts is schematically explained by Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Sch madematic of bonding systems of crystals, glasses, and melts. The black points and circles represent atoms, black segments – chemical bonds, and segments crossed by red dashes – broken bonds termed roken bonds – configurons. These form percolation clusters in liqui – is formeds revealing structural changes which occur at glass transition.

The structural difference between crystals and glasses is obvious both for atoms and bonds – crystals are regular structures whereas glasses are topologically disordered. The difference between glasses and melts are revealed only for bonds: both glasses and liquids are disordered however glasses have broken bonds only as point-like defects whereas in liquids they form macroscopical percolating structures.

The glass transition temperature in the configuron percolation theory (CPT) of glass transition is given by:

where Hd and Sd are the enthalpy and entropy of configuron (broken bond) formation, fc is the percolation threshold which determines when the first time a percolation cluster made of broken bonds – configurons – is formed[4]

.

Uses of glasses

4. Uses of glasses

Glasses are typically formed on enough rapid cooling of molten materials therefore, following Michael Faraday, the glass can be defined as a solid solution of different substances one in another. Glasses are also formed and occur naturally for example volcanic glasses such as obsidians. Glasses are irreplaceable in the day-by-day life with important technological, medical and scientific applications including physics, chemistry, biology, geology as well as artistic and decorative uses. The most important applications of glasses are well overviewed in the recently published Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture. These include: Glazes and enamels

[17]

, Flat glass

[18]

, Optical glasses

[19]

, and optical fibers

[20]

, Thermal insulation

[21]

, Architecture (buildings)

[22]

, Solar energy harvesting

[23]

, Dental

[24]

and biological applications

[25]

, Pharmaceutics

[26]

, Screens and displays

[27]

, Lighting

[28]

, Optoelectronics

[29]

, Bulk metallic glasses

[30]

, Nuclear waste vitrification

[31]

and Immobilisation of municipal and industrial waste

[32]

.

Conclusions

5. Conclusions

Amorphous materials are largely spread in the nature including glasses. The analysis of bonding system of glassy and crystalline materials shows that they both hold the same Hausdorff-Bezicovitch dimension of bonds. The similarity in bonding of both glassy and crystalline materials result in the similarity of their mechanical behaviour. Amorphous materials are liquid above the glass transition temperature. Transitions in disordered media from the glassy to the liquid state are universal and result from changes which occur in the bonding system. Because of that the configuron percolation theory of glass transition can be used to provide insights on embrittlement of materials composed of microcrystals at low temperatures as well as on such natural phenomena as quicksand formation. In all such cases formation of additional bonds between elementary particles which constitute the material such as microcrystals or sand grains leads to their solid-like behaviour at lower temperatures or denser packing.

 

References

  1. The International Commission on Glass. . The International Commission on Glass.. Retrieved 2021-4-17
  2. Richet, P., Conradt, R., Takada, A., Dyon, J. . Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture. ; Richet, P., Conradt, R., Takada, A., Dyon, J. , Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1568 p..
  3. A.D. McNaught, A. Wilkinson. The IUPAC Compendium on Chemical Terminology.; A.D. McNaught, A. Wilkinson, Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1997; pp. p..
  4. Michael I Ojovan; William E Lee; Topologically disordered systems at the glass transition. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2006, 18, 11507-11520, 10.1088/0953-8984/18/50/007.
  5. Varshneya A.K. . Fundamentals of inorganic glasses.; Society of Glass Technology: Sheffield, 2006; pp. p..
  6. Michael I. Ojovan; Viscosity and Glass Transition in Amorphous Oxides. Advances in Condensed Matter Physics 2008, 2008, 1-23, 10.1155/2008/817829.
  7. Michael I. Ojovan; Glass Formation. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 249-259, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch3.1.
  8. Michael Ojovan; The Modified Random Network (MRN) Model within the Configuron Percolation Theory (CPT) of Glass Transition. Ceramics 2021, 4, 121-134, 10.3390/ceramics4020011.
  9. Yuan-Zheng Yue; Characteristic temperatures of enthalpy relaxation in glass. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 2008, 354, 1112-1118, 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.11.027.
  10. Michael I. Ojovan; Dmitri V. Louzguine-Luzgin; Revealing Structural Changes at Glass Transition via Radial Distribution Functions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124, 3186-3194, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00214.
  11. Michael I. Ojovan; Configurons: Thermodynamic Parameters and Symmetry Changes at Glass Transition. Entropy 2008, 10, 334-364, 10.3390/e10030334.
  12. Damba S. Sanditov; Michael I. Ojovan; Relaxation aspects of the liquid—glass transition. Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk 2018, 189, 113-133, 10.3367/ufnr.2018.04.038319.
  13. C. A. Angell; K. L. Ngai; Gregory B McKenna; Paul F McMillan; Steve W Martin; Relaxation in glassforming liquids and amorphous solids. Journal of Applied Physics 2000, 88, 3113-3157, 10.1063/1.1286035.
  14. Michael I. Ojovan; On Viscous Flow in Glass-Forming Organic Liquids. Molecules 2020, 25, 4029, 10.3390/molecules25174029.
  15. J.F. Stanzione; K.E. Strawhecker; R.P. Wool; Observing the twinkling fractal nature of the glass transition. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 2011, 357, 311-319, 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.06.041.
  16. S. Albert; Th. Bauer; M. Michl; G. Biroli; J.- P. Bouchaud; A. Loidl; P. Lunkenheimer; R. Tourbot; C. Wiertel-Gasquet; F. Ladieu; et al. Fifth-order susceptibility unveils growth of thermodynamic amorphous order in glass-formers. Science 2016, 352, 1308-1311, 10.1126/science.aaf3182.
  17. Philippe Colomban; Glazes and Enamels. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1309-1325, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch10.6.
  18. Bernard J. Savaëte; The World of the Flat‐glass Industry. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1135-1146, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.6.
  19. Alix Clare; Optical Glasses. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 665-675, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch6.1.
  20. John Ballato; Optical Fibers. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 705-719, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch6.4.
  21. Yuanzheng Yue; Mette Solvang; Stone and Glass Wool. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1103-1112, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.3.
  22. Freek Bos; Christian Louter; Structural Glass in Architecture. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1071-1090, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.1.
  23. Joachim Deubener; Gundula Helsch; Glasses for Solar‐energy Technologies. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1113-1123, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.4.
  24. Wolfram Höland; Marcel Schweiger; Dental Glass‐Ceramics. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1005-1011, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch8.5.
  25. Delia S. Brauer; Julian R. Jones; Bioactive Glasses. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 991-1003, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch8.4.
  26. Daniele Zuccato; Emanuel Guadagnino; Glass for Pharmaceutical Use. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 879-889, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch7.7.
  27. Kei Maeda; Screens and Displays. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 787-797, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch6.10.
  28. Hiroki Yamazaki; Shigeru Yamamoto; Glass for Lighting. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 775-785, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch6.9.
  29. Jong Heo; Kai Xu; Optoelectronics. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 735-749, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch6.6.
  30. Dmitri V. Louzguine‐Luzgin; Akihisa Inoue; Bulk Metallic Glasses. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 919-936, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch7.10.
  31. Olivier Pinet; Etienne Vernaz; Christian Ladirat; Stéphane Gin; Nuclear Waste Vitrification. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 1, 1205-1218, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.11.
  32. Soraya Heuss‐Aßbichler; Athanasius P. Bayuseno; Immobilization of Municipal and Industrial Waste. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 2, 1191-1204, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.10.
  33. Soraya Heuss‐Aßbichler; Athanasius P. Bayuseno; Immobilization of Municipal and Industrial Waste. Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture 2021, 2, 1191-1204, 10.1002/9781118801017.ch9.10.
More
Video Production Service