Stress, Anxiety and Depression: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Conner Chen and Version 1 by Sylwia Chojnowska.

Stress, anxiety and depressive disorders are often characterized by the activation of the stress axis, which results in similar symptoms at some point in these disorders. These disorders are closely related to each other—they occur simultaneously or follow one another. The diagnosis of stress, anxiety and depression is not a perfect procedure currently—it is based on patient observation and an interview with the patient and their family. There are no laboratory tests that would dispel the doubts of the doctor making the diagnosis and allow the appropriate treatment to be implemented as soon as possible. Therefore, this study will review the components of saliva that could be helpful in the quick diagnosis of stress, anxiety and/or depression. Such potential salivary biomarkers could also be useful in monitoring the effectiveness of pharmacological treatment prescribed by a psychiatrist. The following are promising salivary biomarkers of stress, anxiety or depression: cortisol, immunoglobulin A (sIgA), lysozyme, melatonin, α-amylase (sAA), chromogranin A (CgA) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2). 

  • salivary biomarkers
  • stress
  • anxiety
  • depression

1. Stress, Anxiety and Depression

For the past decade, more and more affective disorders have been diagnosed worldwide. Research reports suggest that depression is the second most common disease in the world after heart failure and may even take the lead in 2030 [1,2,3]. Depressive disorders are very often preceded by the stress and accompanied by anxiety—the coexistence of anxiety and depression is found in nearly 75% of children and adolescents [3,4]. However, if anxiety and depressive disorders do not occur at the same time, they usually follow one another. It is estimated that the probability of anxiety disorders after a depressive episode is 47–58%, and 56% of patients with anxiety disorders develop depression [5,6,7]. About 50% of depressive episodes are preceded by sudden, negative life events experienced by patients [8,9,10,11,12]. Other factors predisposing to a depressive episode include chronic somatic diseases, including diabetes, multiple sclerosis, neoplastic diseases, myocardial infarction, stroke, obesity, etc. [13]. In both of the above-mentioned cases, we deal with stressful situations. Experiencing stress definitely influences the emotional state of patients, as it initiates changes in the brain’s neurochemistry. Chronic stress causes a decrease in serotonin levels, changes in the density of serotonergic system receptors, an increase in glutamate levels and a decrease in the concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [14]. Unfortunately, stress is a phenomenon that occurs in everyone’s life. Additionally, most people feel anxious or even depressed from time to time. If the symptoms listed above are mild and pass in a relatively short time, they do not pose any major health risks. What is more, experiencing temporary stress is a positive reaction for the body, thanks to which processes that enable a person to properly cope with the challenges faced are triggered [8,14]. The actual anxiety or depressive disorders manifest themselves in a long-lasting, self-limiting intensification of experiencing negative emotions. Anxiety and depression definitely make it difficult for the patient to function in society. Over time, a patient with anxiety or depression loses their self-esteem and, subsequently, loses the motivation to take any life actions. Patients suffering from anxiety and/or depression suffer from problems with sleeping, appetite, psychomotor activity (agitation or impairment), dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system and digestive tract, sometimes even from psychosis, which can lead to thoughts and even attempted suicide. Anxiety and depression are complex disorders that have many subtypes and etiologies [7,9,10,15,16]. Currently, in psychiatry, the main method used to diagnose stress, anxiety and/or depression are patient observation and medical interviews conducted with the patient and members of their immediate family (

For the past decade, more and more affective disorders have been diagnosed worldwide. Research reports suggest that depression is the second most common disease in the world after heart failure and may even take the lead in 2030 [1][2][3]. Depressive disorders are very often preceded by the stress and accompanied by anxiety—the coexistence of anxiety and depression is found in nearly 75% of children and adolescents [3][4]. However, if anxiety and depressive disorders do not occur at the same time, they usually follow one another. It is estimated that the probability of anxiety disorders after a depressive episode is 47–58%, and 56% of patients with anxiety disorders develop depression [5][6][7]. About 50% of depressive episodes are preceded by sudden, negative life events experienced by patients [8][9][10][11][12]. Other factors predisposing to a depressive episode include chronic somatic diseases, including diabetes, multiple sclerosis, neoplastic diseases, myocardial infarction, stroke, obesity, etc. [13]. In both of the above-mentioned cases, we deal with stressful situations. Experiencing stress definitely influences the emotional state of patients, as it initiates changes in the brain’s neurochemistry. Chronic stress causes a decrease in serotonin levels, changes in the density of serotonergic system receptors, an increase in glutamate levels and a decrease in the concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [14]. Unfortunately, stress is a phenomenon that occurs in everyone’s life. Additionally, most people feel anxious or even depressed from time to time. If the symptoms listed above are mild and pass in a relatively short time, they do not pose any major health risks. What is more, experiencing temporary stress is a positive reaction for the body, thanks to which processes that enable a person to properly cope with the challenges faced are triggered [8][14]. The actual anxiety or depressive disorders manifest themselves in a long-lasting, self-limiting intensification of experiencing negative emotions. Anxiety and depression definitely make it difficult for the patient to function in society. Over time, a patient with anxiety or depression loses their self-esteem and, subsequently, loses the motivation to take any life actions. Patients suffering from anxiety and/or depression suffer from problems with sleeping, appetite, psychomotor activity (agitation or impairment), dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system and digestive tract, sometimes even from psychosis, which can lead to thoughts and even attempted suicide. Anxiety and depression are complex disorders that have many subtypes and etiologies [7][9][10][15][16]. Currently, in psychiatry, the main method used to diagnose stress, anxiety and/or depression are patient observation and medical interviews conducted with the patient and members of their immediate family (

Figure 1). In the diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety, additionally, the so-called diagnostic tests (e.g., Beck and Montgomery-Asberg in depression, Hamilton in depression and anxiety and Perceived Stress Scale) are used [17,18,19]. The above-mentioned diagnostic tests are very valuable in the diagnosis of stress, anxiety and depression, but it would be better if they could complement the proper diagnosis or be used to assess the severity of the disorder or to observe the effectiveness of the therapy [14]. The multitude of causes of stress, anxiety and depression, as well as the symptoms overlapping with those of other mental disorders, often make it difficult for psychiatrists to make an appropriate diagnosis and apply effective treatment. There are no specific laboratory tests that would be helpful in the diagnosis of anxiety and depression.

). In the diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety, additionally, the so-called diagnostic tests (e.g., Beck and Montgomery-Asberg in depression, Hamilton in depression and anxiety and Perceived Stress Scale) are used [17][18][19]. The above-mentioned diagnostic tests are very valuable in the diagnosis of stress, anxiety and depression, but it would be better if they could complement the proper diagnosis or be used to assess the severity of the disorder or to observe the effectiveness of the therapy [14]. The multitude of causes of stress, anxiety and depression, as well as the symptoms overlapping with those of other mental disorders, often make it difficult for psychiatrists to make an appropriate diagnosis and apply effective treatment. There are no specific laboratory tests that would be helpful in the diagnosis of anxiety and depression.

Jcm 10 00517 g001 550
Figure 1.

 The procedure currently used to diagnose stress, anxiety and depression.

Therefore, this study will review salivary biomarkers that may be helpful in the diagnosis of stress, anxiety and depression. We chose saliva because in our opinion saliva is an ideal biological fluid for diagnostic, because it does not coagulate, it is stable for 24 h at room temperature and for a week at 4 °C. The use of saliva in medical diagnostics is becoming more and more popular; it is cheap, non-invasive, painless and convenient for both young children and the elderly. Saliva can be collected at the patient’s home and transported to the laboratory without the involvement of any medical personnel [20,21]. Saliva contains many substances, the concentration of which reflects the health of the whole organism, which can be used in easy and quick detection of early pathological changes in humans [22,23,24,25]. Saliva components can be cheaply determined using specific and sensitive immunological and/or biochemical methods, such as radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), spectrophotometry or chromatography [26,27].

Therefore, this study will review salivary biomarkers that may be helpful in the diagnosis of stress, anxiety and depression. We chose saliva because in our opinion saliva is an ideal biological fluid for diagnostic, because it does not coagulate, it is stable for 24 h at room temperature and for a week at 4 °C. The use of saliva in medical diagnostics is becoming more and more popular; it is cheap, non-invasive, painless and convenient for both young children and the elderly. Saliva can be collected at the patient’s home and transported to the laboratory without the involvement of any medical personnel [20][21]. Saliva contains many substances, the concentration of which reflects the health of the whole organism, which can be used in easy and quick detection of early pathological changes in humans [22][23][24][25]. Saliva components can be cheaply determined using specific and sensitive immunological and/or biochemical methods, such as radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), spectrophotometry or chromatography [26][27].

Despite the advantages of saliva, which we have listed above, we are aware that saliva is not an ideal biological material. The individual composition of saliva can be influenced by many factors, such as age, sex, smoking, diet, medications or the pathophysiological condition of the oral cavity. There are also other biological materials that are also non-invasive and cheap to obtain, such as hair, but they also have some disadvantages, as the composition of the hair can be highly adulterated with hair dyes or other cosmetics used for daily care [28].

2. Stress Biomarkers

Under the influence of stressful stimuli, the physiological activation of specific areas of both the central and peripheral nervous system takes place. The nervous system’s response to stress includes stimulation of the hypothalamus and brainstem, activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which includes the efferent sympathetic–adrenal–medullary (SAM) system. These systems work together with the immune system and are closely involved in the pathogenesis of stress-related diseases [29]. All of the body’s compensatory responses listed above involve the production of organic chemicals that can subsequently be found in the blood serum and saliva. In the literature, you can find publications indicating the relationship between stress, depression and/or anxiety and the concentration of cortisol, immunoglobulin A, lysozyme, melatonin, alpha-amylase, chromogranin A and/or fibroblast growth factor 2 in saliva.

3. Cortisol

Cortisol is a hormone produced by the adrenal cortex, mainly in the second half of the night, which means that serum cortisol levels are highest between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m. During the day, the levels of cortisol drop significantly and, in the evening, only about 10% of the morning cortisol remains in the body. When a person is exposed to mental or physical stress, the adrenal glands produce increased amounts of cortisol. Cortisol activates metabolism, which provides the body with energy (e.g., by releasing glucose into the blood) and changes the conditions of mental reactions (by enhancing the action of other “stress hormones”—adrenaline and noradrenaline—thanks to which the body gets an additional boost of energy to cope with the situation stress) [30,31,32]. Therefore, cortisol is a substance most often indicated by researchers as a stress biomarker [33,34,35,36]. Miller et al. conducted a meta-analysis of the link between strong, short-term stress with the activity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and confirmed the importance of salivary cortisol as a biomarker of acute stress. They provided that when the stressor decreased, the morning level of cortisol in the saliva also fell down [37]. The stress is present nearly every day for almost everyone: at work, at school or at home. As a result of being under permanent stress, the human body is exposed to the effects of constantly high levels of cortisol. Therefore, there is a hypothesis that after long exposure to stress (both mental and physical), the HPA axis becomes less sensitive, which results in a decrease in the production of cortisol by the adrenal glands [38,39]. This theory is confirmed by the results of studies conducted with the participation of people who were accompanied by long-term anxiety disorders. It turned out that, paradoxically, they had a lower cortisol production than in people not under stress [40]. However, all obtained by the above-mentioned researchers’ results were mainly based on cross-sectional studies of one morning’s saliva sample. Yonekura et al. [41] analyzed the relationship between salivary cortisol levels in adolescents who survived the eastern Japanese earthquake. They found that it was difficult to distinguish people with symptoms of severe depression only on the basis of salivary cortisol point measurements. However, when they compared the changes in salivary cortisol levels over three consecutive days, they found that the group of adolescents with severe symptoms of depression had a significantly higher ratio of morning to evening levels of salivary cortisol compared to the group of adolescents with mild symptoms of depression. Yonekura et al., using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, showed that cortisol measurements repeated in saliva over three consecutive days can identify adolescents with depressive symptoms [41]. The use of salivary cortisol as a potential biomarker of stress and depression requires further research, because the concentration of cortisol in the saliva depends on the disturbance and the circadian rhythm of its secretion. Additionally, we should underline the fact that meta-analyses detected a large heterogeneity between the studies of salivary cortisol, and the study reported that these results seem to be due to lack of standardized kits for measuring salivary cortisol, clinical heterogeneity of the included participants and the bias of risk factors [42].

Cortisol is a hormone produced by the adrenal cortex, mainly in the second half of the night, which means that serum cortisol levels are highest between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m. During the day, the levels of cortisol drop significantly and, in the evening, only about 10% of the morning cortisol remains in the body. When a person is exposed to mental or physical stress, the adrenal glands produce increased amounts of cortisol. Cortisol activates metabolism, which provides the body with energy (e.g., by releasing glucose into the blood) and changes the conditions of mental reactions (by enhancing the action of other “stress hormones”—adrenaline and noradrenaline—thanks to which the body gets an additional boost of energy to cope with the situation stress) [30][31][32]. Therefore, cortisol is a substance most often indicated by researchers as a stress biomarker [33][34][35][36]. Miller et al. conducted a meta-analysis of the link between strong, short-term stress with the activity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and confirmed the importance of salivary cortisol as a biomarker of acute stress. They provided that when the stressor decreased, the morning level of cortisol in the saliva also fell down [37]. The stress is present nearly every day for almost everyone: at work, at school or at home. As a result of being under permanent stress, the human body is exposed to the effects of constantly high levels of cortisol. Therefore, there is a hypothesis that after long exposure to stress (both mental and physical), the HPA axis becomes less sensitive, which results in a decrease in the production of cortisol by the adrenal glands [38][39]. This theory is confirmed by the results of studies conducted with the participation of people who were accompanied by long-term anxiety disorders. It turned out that, paradoxically, they had a lower cortisol production than in people not under stress [40]. However, all obtained by the above-mentioned researchers’ results were mainly based on cross-sectional studies of one morning’s saliva sample. Yonekura et al. [41] analyzed the relationship between salivary cortisol levels in adolescents who survived the eastern Japanese earthquake. They found that it was difficult to distinguish people with symptoms of severe depression only on the basis of salivary cortisol point measurements. However, when they compared the changes in salivary cortisol levels over three consecutive days, they found that the group of adolescents with severe symptoms of depression had a significantly higher ratio of morning to evening levels of salivary cortisol compared to the group of adolescents with mild symptoms of depression. Yonekura et al., using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, showed that cortisol measurements repeated in saliva over three consecutive days can identify adolescents with depressive symptoms [41]. The use of salivary cortisol as a potential biomarker of stress and depression requires further research, because the concentration of cortisol in the saliva depends on the disturbance and the circadian rhythm of its secretion. Additionally, we should underline the fact that meta-analyses detected a large heterogeneity between the studies of salivary cortisol, and the study reported that these results seem to be due to lack of standardized kits for measuring salivary cortisol, clinical heterogeneity of the included participants and the bias of risk factors [42].

4. Immunoglobulin A (IgA)

Stress can weaken the immune system and inhibit the production of immunoglobulins [43]. IgA is a class of antibodies found in the mucous membranes, which is the body’s first defense factor in contact with an infectious pathogen or an allergen [43]. The level of IgA in the saliva also changes in response to psychological factors, such as positive (increase) and negative mood (decrease), or stressful stimuli (decrease) [43,44]. Animal studies have shown that IgA levels are reduced after both prolonged and acute stress [45]. It has been proven that chronic stress in humans is related to the activation of the HPA axis (measured by an increase in salivary cortisol concentration) and to decreased immune system activity (measured by a decrease in salivary IgA and lysozyme concentration) [43,46]. It was even concluded that there was a strong relationship between the perceived stress, depressive symptoms and anxiety with a low level of salivary immunoglobulin A [46].

Stress can weaken the immune system and inhibit the production of immunoglobulins [43]. IgA is a class of antibodies found in the mucous membranes, which is the body’s first defense factor in contact with an infectious pathogen or an allergen [43]. The level of IgA in the saliva also changes in response to psychological factors, such as positive (increase) and negative mood (decrease), or stressful stimuli (decrease) [43][44]. Animal studies have shown that IgA levels are reduced after both prolonged and acute stress [45]. It has been proven that chronic stress in humans is related to the activation of the HPA axis (measured by an increase in salivary cortisol concentration) and to decreased immune system activity (measured by a decrease in salivary IgA and lysozyme concentration) [43][46]. It was even concluded that there was a strong relationship between the perceived stress, depressive symptoms and anxiety with a low level of salivary immunoglobulin A [46].

5. Lysozyme

Lysozyme is a low-molecular-weight cationic protein that is constantly synthesized and released from monocytes and macrophages and is widely distributed in human tissues and secretions, including saliva. Lysozyme gives saliva antibacterial properties. It takes part in the host’s innate immunity defense against pathological microorganisms due to the fact that it has the ability to hydrolyze peptidoglycan β-1,4-glycosidic bonds of bacterial cell walls. Lysozyme also plays a key role in antiviral defense [47,48] and induces the lysis of neoplastic cells [47]. Perera et al. [49] found significantly lower concentrations of lysozyme in samples of saliva collected from students just before the exam compared to those obtained after the end of the exam session, proving that salivary lysozyme can be used as a potential stress marker. Yang et al. [50] showed that salivary lysozyme concentrations are lower in emergency nurses experiencing high occupational stress, compared to nurses who commonly care for patients in non-emergency wards. A negative correlation between the concentration of lysozyme and exposure to stress was also demonstrated by other researchers [51,52], which additionally confirm the theory that there was an increased susceptibility to any infections during exposure to stress. Currently, lysozyme is used as a biomarker in the diagnosis of chronic stress [52]. However, there is no information on the concentration of lysozyme in the saliva of people suffering from depression or anxiety.

Lysozyme is a low-molecular-weight cationic protein that is constantly synthesized and released from monocytes and macrophages and is widely distributed in human tissues and secretions, including saliva. Lysozyme gives saliva antibacterial properties. It takes part in the host’s innate immunity defense against pathological microorganisms due to the fact that it has the ability to hydrolyze peptidoglycan β-1,4-glycosidic bonds of bacterial cell walls. Lysozyme also plays a key role in antiviral defense [47][48] and induces the lysis of neoplastic cells [47]. Perera et al. [49] found significantly lower concentrations of lysozyme in samples of saliva collected from students just before the exam compared to those obtained after the end of the exam session, proving that salivary lysozyme can be used as a potential stress marker. Yang et al. [50] showed that salivary lysozyme concentrations are lower in emergency nurses experiencing high occupational stress, compared to nurses who commonly care for patients in non-emergency wards. A negative correlation between the concentration of lysozyme and exposure to stress was also demonstrated by other researchers [51][52], which additionally confirm the theory that there was an increased susceptibility to any infections during exposure to stress. Currently, lysozyme is used as a biomarker in the diagnosis of chronic stress [52]. However, there is no information on the concentration of lysozyme in the saliva of people suffering from depression or anxiety.

6. Melatonin

Melatonin is a serotonin derivative, produced by pinealocytes, found in the pineal gland. The main task of melatonin is to synchronize the human internal biological clock with the day and night cycle. The concentration of melatonin in the body fluctuates throughout the day: it rises in the evening until it reaches its peak at 2–4 a.m. and then gradually decreases until the morning hours, when melatonin production is stopped. The interaction of melatonin with the main melatonin receptors modulates phases of sleeping, which ensures the quality of sleep [53]. Melatonin also has strong antioxidant properties. By enabling the proper regeneration of the human body during sleep, melatonin increases resistance to external factors (both physical and mental) [54]. Sleep disturbances can also be caused by a chronic stress [55]. Sleep disorders include difficulty falling asleep, inability to maintain continuous sleep, resulting in poor quality of sleeping or waking up prematurely. Long-term sleep problems can have a negative effect on health by lowering immunity, increasing the risk of high blood pressure, heart disease or insulin resistance. Circadian rhythm disorders (including insomnia), which often occur during stress, depression or anxiety, additionally increase the level of mental stress and deepen the depressive state [55,56]. Voultsios et al. [57] proved that the level of salivary melatonin is strongly correlated with the level of melatonin in the plasma. Therefore, based on the concentration of melatonin in the saliva, circadian rhythm of its secretion can be assessed. Ito et al. [58] reported that the level of salivary melatonin (both nighttime and daytime) was strongly correlated with depression and, therefore, suggested that salivary melatonin could be successfully used as a salivary biomarker in the diagnosis of depression. Moreover, the same authors proved that melatonin levels in saliva at night are moderately correlated with the anxiety disorders [58]. However, that correlation was not as strong as in the case with depression. Paul et al. [59], in turn, found a significant reduction in the levels of salivary melatonin at night in soldiers suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The results published by researchers seem to be very promising. Therefore, melatonin in the saliva may become a clinically useful biomarker in the future [60].

Melatonin is a serotonin derivative, produced by pinealocytes, found in the pineal gland. The main task of melatonin is to synchronize the human internal biological clock with the day and night cycle. The concentration of melatonin in the body fluctuates throughout the day: it rises in the evening until it reaches its peak at 2–4 a.m. and then gradually decreases until the morning hours, when melatonin production is stopped. The interaction of melatonin with the main melatonin receptors modulates phases of sleeping, which ensures the quality of sleep [53]. Melatonin also has strong antioxidant properties. By enabling the proper regeneration of the human body during sleep, melatonin increases resistance to external factors (both physical and mental) [54]. Sleep disturbances can also be caused by a chronic stress [55]. Sleep disorders include difficulty falling asleep, inability to maintain continuous sleep, resulting in poor quality of sleeping or waking up prematurely. Long-term sleep problems can have a negative effect on health by lowering immunity, increasing the risk of high blood pressure, heart disease or insulin resistance. Circadian rhythm disorders (including insomnia), which often occur during stress, depression or anxiety, additionally increase the level of mental stress and deepen the depressive state [55][56]. Voultsios et al. [57] proved that the level of salivary melatonin is strongly correlated with the level of melatonin in the plasma. Therefore, based on the concentration of melatonin in the saliva, circadian rhythm of its secretion can be assessed. Ito et al. [58] reported that the level of salivary melatonin (both nighttime and daytime) was strongly correlated with depression and, therefore, suggested that salivary melatonin could be successfully used as a salivary biomarker in the diagnosis of depression. Moreover, the same authors proved that melatonin levels in saliva at night are moderately correlated with the anxiety disorders [58]. However, that correlation was not as strong as in the case with depression. Paul et al. [59], in turn, found a significant reduction in the levels of salivary melatonin at night in soldiers suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The results published by researchers seem to be very promising. Therefore, melatonin in the saliva may become a clinically useful biomarker in the future [60].

7. Salivary Alpha-Amylase (sAA)

Salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) is the main digestive enzyme of the oral cavity, which, apart from the hydrolysis of starch and glycogen, also has an immunological function, protecting the oral cavity from microorganisms [61]. Salivary alpha-amylase has also been recognized as a marker that is sensitive to stimuli activating the sympathetic system (e.g., adrenaline) [62]. In health, alpha-amylase levels are the lowest in early morning and the highest in late afternoon [63]. In response to stress, the concentration of alpha-amylase in saliva increases abruptly, which makes it an important salivary biomarker of stress [64], particularly acute stress, e.g., during blood sampling [65]. Acute stress activates the axis of sympathetic nervous system, adrenal medulla, which is reflected not only in the concentration of salivary alpha-amylase, but also in the concentration of salivary chromogranin A [46]. The usefulness of salivary alpha-amylase as a salivary biomarker of acute stress and anxiety was confirmed by Jafari et al. [66] pointing to its reliability and objectivity in the measurement of anxiety associated with dental treatment. In turn, Vineetha et al. [67] showed that alpha-amylase activity in the saliva increases in patients experiencing chronic stress. Van Veen et al. [68], however, suggested that sAA could be a potential salivary stress marker in people sensitive to a negative social assessment.

8. Chromogranin A (CgA)

CgA is an acidic glycoprotein released from the adrenal medulla and sympathetic nerve endings that can be measured in the saliva [69,70]. A significant increase in the concentration of CgA was found in the saliva of pigs subjected to isolation stress or stress related to immobilization, thus suggesting salivary chromagranin A as a sensitive and specific biomarker of acute stress in pigs [71]. Salivary CgA is also indicated by many researchers as a promising, sensitive salivary biomarker of psychosomatic stress in humans [72,73,74,75,76,77,78]. It has been proven that a rapid and specific increase in CgA in human saliva occurs in response to various stress factors, e.g., public speaking [72], sports [79], noise [75,80], passing an academic exam [81], medical intervention [76,77,82] or driving a car [75]. However, there are no reports on the level of salivary chromogranin A in people diagnosed with depression or anxiety. A significant advantage of determining salivary CgA, compared to the above-mentioned biomarkers of stress in saliva (cortisol, alpha-amylase, IgA), is that CgA levels are not affected by the time of the day. Although concentrations of salivary CgA peak shortly after waking up, they decline very quickly (within only 1 h), remaining constant throughout the day [72].

CgA is an acidic glycoprotein released from the adrenal medulla and sympathetic nerve endings that can be measured in the saliva [69][70]. A significant increase in the concentration of CgA was found in the saliva of pigs subjected to isolation stress or stress related to immobilization, thus suggesting salivary chromagranin A as a sensitive and specific biomarker of acute stress in pigs [71]. Salivary CgA is also indicated by many researchers as a promising, sensitive salivary biomarker of psychosomatic stress in humans [72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. It has been proven that a rapid and specific increase in CgA in human saliva occurs in response to various stress factors, e.g., public speaking [72], sports [79], noise [75][80], passing an academic exam [81], medical intervention [76][77][82] or driving a car [75]. However, there are no reports on the level of salivary chromogranin A in people diagnosed with depression or anxiety. A significant advantage of determining salivary CgA, compared to the above-mentioned biomarkers of stress in saliva (cortisol, alpha-amylase, IgA), is that CgA levels are not affected by the time of the day. Although concentrations of salivary CgA peak shortly after waking up, they decline very quickly (within only 1 h), remaining constant throughout the day [72].

References

  1. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classiffication of Mental and Behavior Disorders: Clinical Description and Diagnostics Guideline; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
  2. Wang, F.S.; Aguilar-Gaxiola, S.; Alonso, J.; Angermeyer, M.C.; Borges, G.; Bromet, E.J.; Bruffaerts, R.; De Girolamo, G.; De Graaf, R.; Gureje, O.; et al. Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys. Lancet 2007, 370, 841–850.
  3. Nobis, A.; Zalewski, D.; Waszkiewicz, N. Peripheral Markers of Depression. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3793.
  4. Angold, A.; Costello, E.J. Depressive comorbidity in children andadolescents: Empirical, theoretical, and methodological issues. Am. J. Psychiatr. 1993, 150, 1779–1791.
  5. Stein, D.J.; Hollander, E. Współchorobowość Depresji i Zaburzeń Lękowych; Via Medica: Gdańsk, Poland, 2004.
  6. Graaf, R.; Bijl, R.V.; Spijker, J.; Beekman, A.T.F.; Vollebergh, W.A.M. Temporal sequencing of lifetime mood disorders in relation to comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders. Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health and Incidence Study. Soc. Psychiatr. Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2003, 38, 1–11.
  7. Wittchen, H.U.; Kessler, R.C.; Pfister, H.; Lieb, M. Why do people with anxiety disorders become depressed? A prospective-longitudinal community study. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2000, 406, 14–23.
  8. McEwen, B.S. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 840, 33–44.
  9. Middeldorp, C.; Cath, D.C.; Van Dyck, R.; Boomsma, D.I. The co-morbidity of anxiety and depression in the perspective of genetic epidemiology. A review of twin and family studies. Psychol. Med. 1999, 35, 611–624.
  10. Boyer, P. Do anxiety and depression have a common pathophysiological mechanism? Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2000, 406, 24–29.
  11. Chaves, C.; Castellanos, T.; Abrams, M.; Vazquez, C. The impact of economic recessions on depression and individual and social well-being: The case of Spain (2006–2013). Soc. Psychiatr. Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2018, 53, 977–986.
  12. Beaglehole, B.; Mulder, R.T.; Frampton, C.M.; Boden, J.M.; Newton-Howes, G.; Bell, C.J. Psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after natural disasters: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Br. J. Psychiatr. 2018, 213, 716–722.
  13. Alonso, J.; Angermeyer, M.C.; Bernet, S.; Bruffaerts, T.S.; Brugha, H.; Bryson, G.; de Girolamo, R.; Graaf, K.; Demyttenaere, I.; Gasquet, J.M.; et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2004, 109, 21–27.
  14. McEwen, B.S. The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Res. 2000, 886, 172–189.
  15. Maes, M.; Kubera, M.; Obuchowiczwa, E.; Goehler, L.E.; Brzeszcz, J. Depression’s multiple comorbidities explained by (neuro)inflammatory and oxidative & nitrosative stress pathways. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2011, 32, 7–24.
  16. Kendler, K.S.; Thornton, L.M.; Gardner, C.O. Stressful life events and previous episodes in the etiology of major depression in women: An evaluation of the “kindling” hypothesis. Am. J. Psychiatr. 2000, 157, 1243–1251.
  17. Beck, A.T.; Ward, C.H.; Mendelson, M.; Mock, J.; Erbaugh, J. An Inventory for Measuring Depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatr. 1961, 4, 561–571.
  18. Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 1960, 23, 56–62.
  19. Montgomery, S.A.; Åsberg, M. A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change. Br. J. Psychiatr. 1979, 134, 382–389.
  20. Chojnowska, S.; Baran, T.; Wilińska, I.; Sienicka, P.; Cabaj-Wiater, I.; Knaś, M. Human saliva as a diagnostic material. Adv. Med. Sci. 2018, 63, 185–191.
  21. Kaufman, E.; Lamster, I.B. The diagnostic applications of saliva—A review. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2002, 13, 197–212.
  22. Nunes, L.A.; Mussavira, S.; Bindhu, O.S. Clinical and diagnostic utility of saliva as a non-invasive diagnostic fluid: A systematic review. Biochem. Med. 2015, 25, 177–192.
  23. Kochurova, E.V.; Kozlov, S.V. The diagnostic possibilities of saliva. Klin. Lab. Diagn. 2014, 1, 13–15.
  24. Al Kawas, S.A.; Rahim, Z.H.; Ferguson, D.B. Potential uses of human salivary protein and peptide analysis in the diagnostic of disease. Arch. Oral Biol. 2012, 57, 1–9.
  25. Wong, D.T. Saliva the body’s mirror. Dimens. Dent. Hyg. 2006, 4, 14–17.
  26. Ivkovic, N.; Bozovic, A.; Racic, M.; Popovic-Grubac, D.; Davidovic, B. Biomarkers of stress in saliva. Acta Facult. Med. Nis 2015, 32, 91–99.
  27. Stachniuk, J.; Kubalczyk, P.; Furmaniak, P.; Głowacki, R. A versatile method for analysis of saliva, plasma and urine for total thiols using HPLC with UV detection. Talanta 2016, 155, 70–77.
  28. Hartwig, S.; Auwärter, V.; Pragst, F. Effect of hair care and hair cosmetics on the concentrations of fatty acid ethyl esters in hair as markers of chronically elevated alcohol consumption. Forensic Sci. Int. 2003, 131, 90–97.
  29. Sternberg, E.M. Neural regulation of innate immunity: A coordinated nonspecific host response to pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 318–328.
  30. Gozansky, W.S.; Lynn, J.S.; Laudenslager, M.L.; Kohrt, W.M. Salivary cortisol determined by enzyme immunoassay is preferable to serum total cortisol for assessment of dynamic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 63, 336–341.
  31. Schwartz, E.B.; Granger, D.A.; Susman, E.J.; Gunnar, M.R.; Laird, B. Assessing salivary cortisol in studies of child development. Child Develop. 1998, 69, 1503–1513.
  32. Johnson, L.R. (Ed.) Essential Medical Physiology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 499–502.
  33. Hellhammer, D.H.; Wüst, S.; Kudielka, B.M. Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009, 34, 163–171.
  34. Schoofs, D.; Hartmann, R.; Wolf, O.T. Neuroendocrine stress responses to an oral academic examination: No strong influence of sex, repeated participation and personality traits. Stress 2008, 11, 52–61.
  35. Gröschl, M. Current Status of Salivary Hormone Analysis. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 1759–1769.
  36. Clow, A.; Hucklebridge, F.; Thorn, L. The Cortisol Awakening Response in Context. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2010, 93, 153–175.
  37. Miller, G.E.; Chen, E.; Zhou, E.S. If it goes up, must it come down? Chronic stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in humans. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133, 25–45.
  38. Heim, C.; Ehlert, U.; Hellhammer, D.H. The potential role of hypocortisolism in the pathophysiology of stress-related bodily disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2000, 25, 1–35.
  39. Fries, E.; Hesse, J.; Hellhammer, J.; Hellhammer, D.H. A new view on hypocortisolism. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005, 30, 1010–1016.
  40. Hek, K.; Direk, N.; Newson, R.S.; Hofman, A.; Hoogendijk, W.J.G.; Mulder, C.L.; Tiemeier, H. Anxiety disorders and salivary cortisol levels in older adults: A population-based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 300–305.
  41. Yonekura, T.; Takeda, K.; Shetty, V.; Yamaguchi, M. Relationship between salivary cortisol and depression in adolescent survivors of a major natural disaster. J. Physiol. Sci. 2014, 64, 261–267.
  42. Knorr, U.; Vinberg, M.; Kessing, L.V.; Wetterslev, J. Salivary cortisol in depressed patients versus control persons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2010, 35, 1275–1286.
  43. Cohen, S.; Miller, G.E.; Rabin, B.S. Psychological stress and antibody response to immunization: A critical review of the human literature. Psychosom. Med. 2001, 63, 7–18.
  44. Nomura, S.; Handri, S.; Honda, H. Development of a bionanodevice for detecting stress levels. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2011, 21, 012029.
  45. Svobodová, I.; Chaloupková, H.; Koncel, R.; Bartos, L.; Hradecká, L.; Jebavý, L. Cortisol and Secretory Immunoglobulin A Response to Stress in German Shepherd Dogs. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90820.
  46. Engeland, C.G.; Hugo, F.N.; Hilgert, J.B.; Nascimento, G.G.; Celeste, R.K.; Lim, H.-J.; Marucha, P.T.; Bosch, J.A. Psychological distress and salivary secretory immunity. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 52, 11–17.
  47. Sava, G.; Benetti, A.; Ceschia, V.; Pacor, S. Lysozyme and cancer: Role of exogenous lysozyme as anticancer agent (review). Anticancer. Res. 1989, 9, 583–591.
  48. Lee-Huang, S.; Huang, P.L.; Sun, Y.; Huang, P.L.; Kung, S.; Blithe, D.L.; Hen, H. Lysozyme and RNases as anti-HIV compo-nents in β-core preparations of human chorionic gonadotropin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 2678–2681.
  49. Perera, S.; Uddin, M.; Hayes, J.A. Salivary lysozyme: A noninvasive marker for the study of the effects of stress on natural immunity. Int. J. Behav. Med. 1997, 4, 170–178.
  50. Yang, Y.; Koh, D.; Ng, V.; Lee, C.Y.; Chan, G.; Dong, F.; Goh, S.H.; Anantharaman, V.; Chia, S.E. Self perceived work related stress and the relation with salivary IgA and lysozyme among emergency department nurses. Occup. Environ. Med. 2002, 59, 836–841.
  51. Allgrove, J.E.; Oliveira, M.; Gleeson, M. Stimulating whole saliva affects the response of antimicrobial proteins to exercise. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2013, 24, 649–655.
  52. Abey, S.K.; Yuana, Y.; Joseph, P.V.; Kenea, N.D.; Fourie, N.H.; Sherwin, L.B.; Gonye, G.E.; Smyser, P.A.; Stempinski, E.S.; Boulineaux, C.M.; et al. Lysozyme association with circulating RNA, extracellular vesicles, and chronic stress. BBA Clin. 2017, 7, 23–35.
  53. Dubocovich, M.L.; Yun, K.; Al-Ghoul, W.M.; Benloucif, S.; Monica, I.; Masana, M.I. Selective MT2 melatonin receptor antagonists block melatonin-mediated phase advances of circadian rhythms. FASEB J. 1998, 12, 1211–1220.
  54. Karasek, M. Clinical significance of melatonin. Post N. Med. 2007, 10, 395–398.
  55. Tsuno, N.; Besset, A.; Ritchie, K. Sleep and Depression. J. Clin. Psychiatr. 2005, 66, 1254–1269.
  56. Heitzman, J. Zaburzenia snu—Przyczyna czy skutek depresji? Psych. Pol. 2009, 43, 499–511.
  57. Voultsios, A.; Kennaway, D.J.; Dawson, D. Salivary Melatonin as a Circadian Phase Marker: Validation and Comparison to Plasma Melatonin. J. Biol. Rhythm. 1997, 12, 457–466.
  58. Ito, Y.; Iida, T.; Yamamura, Y.; Teramura, M.; Nakagami, Y.; Kawai, K.; Nagamura, Y.; Teradaira, R. Relationships between Salivary Melatonin Levels, Quality of Sleep, and Stress in Young Japanese Females. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2013, 6, 75–85.
  59. Paul, M.A.; Love, R.J.; Jetly, R.; Richardson, J.D.; Lanius, R.A.; Miller, J.C.; Macdonald, M.; Rhind, S.G. Blunted Nocturnal Salivary Melatonin Secretion Profiles in Military-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Front. Psychiatr. 2019, 10, 882.
  60. Sundberg, I.; Ramklint, M.; Stridsberg, M.; Papadopoulos, F.C.; Ekselius, L.; Cunningham, J.L. Salivary Melatonin in Relation to Depressive Symptom Severity in Young Adults. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152814.
  61. Scannapieco, F.A.; Torres, G.; Levine, M.J. Salivary α-Amylase: Role in Dental Plaque and Caries Formation. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 1993, 4, 301–307.
  62. Takai, N.; Yamaguchi, M.; Aragaki, T.; Eto, K.; Uchihashi, K.; Nishikawa, Y. Effect of physiological stress on salivary cortisol and amylase levels in healthy young adults. Arch. Oral Biol. 2004, 49, 963–968.
  63. O’Donnell, K.; Kammerer, M.; O’Reilly, R.; Taylor, A.; Glover, V. Salivary α-amylase stability, diurnal profile and lack of response to the cold hand test in young women. Stress 2009, 12, 549–554.
  64. Strahler, J.; Mueller, A.; Rosenloecher, F.; Kirschbaum, C.; Rohleder, N. Salivary alpha-amylase stress reactivity across different age groups. Psychophysiology 2010, 47, 587–595.
  65. Koh, D.; Ng, V.; Naing, L. Alpha Amylase as a Salivary Biomarker of Acute Stress of Venepuncture from Periodic Medical Examinations. Front. Public Health 2014, 2, 121.
  66. Jafari, A.; Pouramir, M.; Shirzad, A.; Motallebnejad, M.; Bijani, A.; Moudi, S.; Abolghasem-Zade, F.; Dastan, Z. Evaluation of Salivary Alpha Amylase as a Biomarker for Dental Anxiety. Iran. J. Psychiatr. Behav. Sci. 2018, 12, 9350.
  67. Vineetha, R.; Pai, K.M.; Vengal, M.; Gopalakrishna, K.; Narayanakurup, D. Usefulness of salivary alpha amylase as a biomarker of chronic stress and stress related oral mucosal changes—A pilot study. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2014, 6, e132–e137.
  68. Van Veen, J.; Van Vliet, I.; De Rijk, R.; Van Pelt, J.; Mertens, B.; Zitman, F. Elevated alpha-amylase but not cortisol in generalized social anxiety disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2008, 33, 1313–1321.
  69. Nagasawa, S.; Nishikawa, Y.; Li, J.; Futai, Y. Simple enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of immunoreactive chromogranin A in human plasma, urine and saliva. Biomed. Res. 1998, 19, 407–410.
  70. Nishikawa, Y.; Li, J.; Futai, Y.; Yanaihara, N.; Iguchi, K.; Mochizuki, T.; Hoshino, M.; Janaichara, C. Region-specific radio-immunoassay for human chromogranin A. Biomed. Res. 1998, 19, 245–251.
  71. Escribano, D.; Gutierrez, A.M.; Tecles, F.; Ceron, J.J. Changes in saliva biomarkers of stress and immunity in domestic pigs exposed to a psychosocial stressor. Res. Vet. Sci. 2015, 102, 38–44.
  72. Nakane, H.; Asami, O.; Yamada, Y.; Harada, T.; Matsui, N.; Kanno, T.; Yanaihara, N. Salivary chromogranin a as an index of psychosomatic stress response. Biomed. Res. 1998, 19, 401–406.
  73. Nakane, H.; Asami, O.; Yamada, Y.; Harada, T.; Matsui, N.; Kanno, T.; Yanaihara, N. Effect of negative air ions on computer operation, anxiety and salivary chromogranin A-like immunoreactivity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2002, 46, 85–89.
  74. Kanamura, Y.; Kikukawa, A.; Shimamura, K. Salivary chromogranin-A as a marker of psychological stress during a cognitive test battery in humans. Stress 2006, 9, 127–131.
  75. Ng, V.; Koh, D.; Mok, B.Y.; Chia, S.E.; Lim, L.P. Salivary biomarkers associated with academic assessment stress among dental undergraduates. J. Dent. Educ. 2003, 67, 1091–1094.
  76. Obara, S.; Iwama, H. Assessment of psychological tension after premedication by measurement of salivary chromogranin A. J. Clin. Anesthesiol. 2005, 17, 554–557.
  77. Hua, J.; Le, S.C.; Larue, J.; Joséf, M.J.C.; Devillers, L.; Filaire, E. Global stress response during asocial stress test: Impact of alexithymia and its subfactors. Psychoneuroendocrinol 2014, 50, 53–61.
  78. Dia, M.M.; Bocanegra, O.L.; Teixeira, R.R.; Soares, S.S.; Espindola, F.S. Response of salivary markers of autonomicactivity to elite competition. Int. J. Sports Med. 2012, 33, 763–768.
  79. Lee, T.; Shimizu, T.; Iijima, M.; Obinata, K.; Yamashiro, Y.; Nagasawa, S. Evaluation of psychosomatic stress in children by measuring salivary chromogranin A. Acta Paediatr. 2006, 95, 935–939.
  80. Miyakawa, M.; Matsui, T.; Kishikawa, H.; Murayama, R.; Uchiyama, I.; Itoh, T.; Yoshida, T. Salivary chromogranin A as a measure of stress response to noise. Noise Health 2006, 8, 108.
  81. Takatsuji, K.; Sugimoto, Y.; Ishizaki, S.; Ozaki, Y.; Matsuyama, E.; Yamaguchi, Y. The effects of examination stresson salivary cortisol, immunoglobulin A, and chromogranin A in nursing students. Biomed. Res. 2008, 29, 221–224.
  82. Muneta, Y.; Yoshikawa, T.; Minagawa, Y.; Shibahara, T.; Maeda, R.; Omata, Y. Salivary IgA as a useful non-invasive marker for restraint stress in pigs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010, 72, 1295–1300.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback