Room Temperature Sodium Sulfur Batteries: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 10 by Vicky Zhou and Version 9 by Vicky Zhou.

Lithium metal batteries have achieved large-scale application, but still have limitations such as poor safety performance and high cost, and limited lithium resources limit the production of lithium batteries. The construction of these devices is also hampered by limited lithium supplies. Therefore, it is particularly important to find alternative metals for lithium replacement. Sodium has the properties of rich in content, low cost and ability to provide high voltage, which makes it an ideal substitute for lithium. Sulfur-based materials have attributes of high energy density, high theoretical specific capacity and are easily oxidized. They may be used as cathodes matched with sodium anodes to form a sodium-sulfur battery. Traditional sodium-sulfur batteries are used at a temperature of about 300 °C. In order to solve problems associated with flammability, explosiveness and energy loss caused by high-temperature use conditions, most research is now focused on the development of room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Regardless of safety performance or energy storage performance, room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries have great potential as next-generation secondary batteries. This article summarizes the working principle and existing problems for room temperature sodium-sulfur battery, and summarizes the methods necessary to solve key scientific problems to improve the comprehensive energy storage performance of sodium-sulfur battery from four aspects: cathode, anode, electrolyte and separator.

  • room temperature sodium-sulfur battery
  • shuttle effect
  • electrode design
  • separator
  • electrolyte

1. Introduction

With the development of society and the depletion of natural resources, people have to start using renewable energy to develop low-cost and high-efficiency energy storage devices, such as secondary batteries. The ideal performance characteristics of energy storage devices are high energy density, high power density, long cycle life, low cost and high safety [1]. Among the existing secondary batteries, lithium-ion batteries have been industrialized, but their high cost, low practical energy density (100–200 Wh kg−1) and poor safety performance limit their application [2][3]. In order to meet the energy storage needs of current society, it is necessary to design and develop other batteries with lower cost, longer cycle life and higher energy density and power density.

Sodium is a low-cost alternative to lithium. The content of sodium in the Earth’s crust and water is 28,400 mg kg−1 and 1000 mg L−1, respectively, which far exceeds the content of lithium. The electrochemical reduction potential of sodium is −2.71 V, which is slightly higher than that of lithium (−3.02 V) [4], and is similar to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) potential [5]. When sodium is used as the anode, it can provide a battery voltage greater than 2 V when matched with an appropriate cathode. The high content, low cost and ability to provide high voltage make sodium an ideal choice for the anode materials of high-energy secondary batteries [6]. Sulfur has the advantages of strong oxidizing property, mature treatment technology, low cost, ready use [7], no toxicity and high capacity (when each atom transfers two electrons [8], the capacity of sulfur is 1.675 mAh g−1) [9], etc. Sulfur has an attractive advantage over lithium as a battery cathode. Compared with lithium-sulfur batteries, sodium-sulfur batteries are a better choice from the perspective of sustainable development and economy, or from the perspective of battery preset performance [10].

The earliest sodium-sulfur battery was constructed in the laboratory of Ford Motor Company, and Kummer and Weber confirmed its feasibility [11]. The battery uses sodium and sulfur as the active materials for the cathodes and anodes, and β-Al2O3 ceramics are used as both the electrolyte and the separator. In order to reduce the transmission resistance of sodium ions in the alumina solid electrolyte, it is necessary to ensure that the electrode material is in a molten state, so the working temperature is set at 250–300 °C. Due to the advantages of long service life, high charging efficiency and high energy density, high-temperature sodium-sulfur battery systems have been used in stationary energy storage systems [12]. However, in order to maintain the molten conductive state of the two poles, a high operating temperature is required. The high operating temperature not only causes a loss of electrical energy, but also may cause the failure of the solid electrolyte, which causes explosions and fires due to contact between the cathode and the anode. These problems limit the wide application of high-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries [13].

In order to obviate the above problems, research has been directed toward the development of room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. The first room temperature sodium-sulfur battery developed showed a high initial discharge capacity of 489 mAh g−1 and two voltage platforms of 2.28 V and 1.28 V [14]. The sodium-sulfur battery has a theoretical specific energy of 954 Wh kg−1 at room temperature, which is much higher than that of a high-temperature sodium–sulfur battery. Although room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries solve the problems of explosion, energy consumption and corrosion of high-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries, their cycle life is much shorter than that associated with high-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. For a wider range of applications, its cycle performance needs to be improved [13].

Room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries have the advantages of high safety performance, low cost, abundant resource and high energy density [15][16]. They not only solve the safety problem of high-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries, but also solve the problem of high cost of lithium-ion batteries, and have received widespread attention. Like the lithium-sulfur battery system, room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries also face many problems, such as:

(1) Low conductivity of sulfur (5 × 10−30 S·cm−1) and significant volume expansion (180%) [17]; (2) capacity attenuation caused by the dissolution of intermediate polysulfide in the electrolyte; (3) short circuit caused by sodium dendrites piercing the separator; (4) low utilization rate of the cathode; (5) poor reversibility, etc. [1]. This article will start with a description of the electrochemical reaction mechanism for the room temperature sodium-sulfur battery, and describe the development of room temperature sodium-sulfur battery in recent years in terms of its cathode, electrolyte, separator design and anode protection.

2. Existing Problems and Solutions

Compared with high-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries, room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries have a higher capacity. However, most reported room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries still fail to reach one third of the theoretical capacity of sulfur [18][19][20]. This may be due to the following theoretical and technological issues:

(1)Sulfur and sulfide have poor conductivity. During battery cycling, electronic conductivity is very important to the electrodes [21]. However, sulfur (5 × 10−30 S·cm−1) and its final recrystallized Na2S are both semiconductors, lacking inherent high electronic conductivity [22];

(2)The volume expansion of sulfur causes serious changes in structure and morphology [23]. During battery discharge, the volume expansion/contraction of sulfur is a key factor in determining battery capacity. When Na2S3 is generated during the discharge process, the volume expansion rate of the sulfur cathode is 36%, for Na2S2, the volume expansion rate is 67% and reaches 157% after Na2S is completely generated [24];

(3)Soluble polysulfide diffuses from cathode the to the anode [6][25]. The inevitable dissolution of Na2Sx (4 ≤ x ≤ 8) leads to a serious shuttle effect between the cathodes and anode, resulting in poor battery cycle stability and high self-discharge rate;

(4)The formation of needle-like sodium dendrites and deposits [15]. Due to the large difference in size between sodium atoms and sodium ions, sodium easily forms unstable electrodeposited layers and dendrites. Once the dendrites reach a certain length, short circuits will occur [1][2];

(5)Due to the large radius of Na+, the reaction activity between S and Na is slow, so the conversion of S to Na2S is incomplete, resulting in low sulfur utilization [26][27][28];

(6)Impedance increases caused by irreversible side reactions [5][29].

Room temperature sodium–sulfur batteries face safety problems caused by the anode sodium dendrites, the insulation problem of the cathode sulfur, the shuttle effect of the intermediate product polysulfide and the loss of active materials caused by its dissolution. Starting from its cathode, electrolyte, anode and separator (Table 1 shows part of the research progress of room temperature sodium–sulfur batteries in the past six years), many methods have been developed to solve these problems:

Table 1. The main research progress of room temperature sodium–sulfur batteries in the past six years.

 
Publish Date Reference Anode Cathode Electrolyte Separator 1st dis. Capacity/mAh/g (C-Rate) 10th dis. Capacity/mAh/g (C-Rate)
2013 Lee et al. [30] Na-Sn-C comp. 60 wt % S/Hollow C comp. (viz. 56 wt % S)

20 wt % CB

20 wt % PEO		 NaCF3SO3

In TEGDME

(4:1 mol %)		 - 1200 600
Hwang et al. [23] Na 70 wt % S/C–PAN comp. (viz. 32 wt % S)

15 wt % CB

15 wt % PVDF		 0.8 M NaClO4 in EC:DMC (1:1) - 364 -
2013 Xin et al. [31] Na 80 wt % S/(CNT@MPC) comp. (viz. 32 wt % S)

10 wt % CB

10 wt % PVDF		 1 M NaClO4 in PC:EC (1:1 v/v) - 1610 1100
2014 Bauer et al. [32] Na 42.5 wt % S

42.5 wt % C

12 wt % PVDF

3 wt % PTFE (dry)		 1 M NaClO4 in TEGDME Nafion coating on PP separator 400 370
Zheng et al. [33] Na 80 wt % HSMC–Cu–S comp. (viz. 50 wt % S)

10 wt % CB

10 wt % CMC (in H2O)		 1 M NaClO4 in EC/DMC (1:1) - 1000 690
Yu et al. [34] Na 60 wt % S

30 wt % CB

10 wt % PVDF		 1.5 M NaClO4 0.3 M NaNO3 in TEGDME - 900 600
Yu et al. [35] Na MWCNT/Na2S6 1.5 M NaClO4 0.3 M NaNO3 in TEGDME - 945 535
Nagata et al. [36] Na-Sn (15:4.9 mol/mol) 50 wt % S

40 wt % SE

10 wt % AC		 P2S5 (viz. 71 wt % S) - 1456 -
NaPS3 (viz.75 wt % S) 1522
Na3PS4 (viz.80 wt % S) 1100
2015 Kim et al. [37] Na 60 wt % S/C comp. (viz. 55 wt % S)

20 wt % PVDF

20 wt % Super-P		 β-Al2O3 (SE)   855 674
1M NaCF3SO3 in TEGDME (L) PP (porous) 350 -
Kim et al. [38] Na SPAN comp. (viz. 41 wt % S) 1M NaPF6 in EC/DEC (1:1 v/v) GF 342 260
2016 Wei et al. [25] Na MCPS1 (viz. 47 wt % S) 1 M NaClO4

5 v% SiO2–IL–ClO4 in EC/PC		 GF 1459 762
Fan et al. [39] Na 70 wt % CSCM comp. (viz.18 wt % S 1 g BDTD)

20 wt % AB

10 wt % CMC

in C2H5OH/H2O (1:2.5 w/w)		 1 M NaClO4 in EC/DMC (6:4 v/v) - 1000 962
Wang et al. [40] Na S/iMCHS comp. (viz.46 wt % S) 1.0 M NaClO4 5 wt % FEC in PC/EC (1:1 v/v) - 1213 430
Qiang et al. [41] Na N,S-HPC/S comp. (viz. 22 wt % S) 1M NaClO4 in EC/PC (1:1 v/v) GF/B 400 399
Yu et al. [42] Na Na2S/AC-CNF comp. (viz. 66 wt % Na2S) 1.5 M NaClO4

0.2 M NaNO3 in TEGDME		 Na-Nafion membrane 563 658
2017 Yue et al. [43] Na-Sn-C Na3PS4-Na2S-C (2:1:1 w/w) comp. Na3PS(SE) - 869 704
2018 Ye et al. [44] Na 70 wt % N/S-OMC-5 comp. (viz.20.32 at% N 0.82 at% S)

20 wt % Super-P

10 wt % PVDF		 1 M NaClO4 5 wt % FEC in EC/PC (1:1 v/v) - 1742 419
Lee et al. [45] Na S/C-PAA 9:1 1M NaClO4 in PC GF 623 558
1M NaClO4 in PC/FEC
Xu et al. [46] Na 80 wt % S@MPCF (6:4 w/w)

10 wt % Super-P

10 wt % CMCNa		 2M NaTFSI in PC/FEC (1:1 v/v) with 10 mM InI3 GF/A 1544 1032
2019 Zhang et al. [47] Na 70 wt % S@Fe-HC

10 wt % CB

20 wt % CMC		 1M NaClO4 in PC/EC (1:1 v/v) with 5 wt % FEC GF 945 630
Li et al. [48] Na 70 wt % Te0.04S0.96@pPAN

20 wt % SuperP

5 wt % SBR

5 wt % NaCMC		 1 M NaClO4 in EC/DMC (1:1 v/v) - 1816 1015
1M NaClO4 in DOL/DME (1:1 v/v) with 10% FEC) 1682 868
Zhu et al. [49] Na 60 wt % S/CPAN comp.

40 wt % SE		 PEO−NaFSI−1% TiO2 comp. - 300 253
Yan et al. [50] Na NiS2@NPCTs/S - - 957 508
2020 Ma et al. [26] Na S@Co/C/rGO - - 490 367
Aslam et al. [51] Na S@BPCS

(hollow polar bipyramid prism catalytic CoS2/C as a sulfur carrier)		 - GF 1347 787
Guo et al. [52] Na ACC-40S (the carbon–sulfur composite electrode with 40 wt % sulfur loading) - GF 1492 1200
Du et al. [16] Na 80 wt % rGO/VO2/S comp.

10 wt % AB

10 wt % PVDF		 1 M NaClO4 in TEGDME. GF 526.2 346
TEGDME: Tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether; PAN: Polyacrylonitrile; PEO: Polyethylene oxide; GF: Glass fiber; PVDF: Polyvinylidene fluoride; CB: Carbon black; EC: Ethylene carbonate; DMC: Dimethyl carbonate; PC: Propylene carbonate; CNT: Carbon nanotubes; MPC: Microporous carbon sheath; PTFE: Poly tetra fluoroethylene; PP: Polypropylene; HSMC: High surface area mesoporous carbon; CMC: Carboxymethyl cellulose; MWCNT: Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; SE: Solid electrolyte; AB: Acetylene Black; FEC: Fluoroethylene carbonate; HPC: Hierarchical porous carbon; AC: Activated carbon; OMC: Mesoporous carbon; PAA: Polyacrylic acid; MPCF: Multiporous carbon fibers; NaTFSI: Sodium bis(trifluoromethylthiocarbonyl)imide; SBR: Polystyrene butadiene copolymer; DOL: 1,3 dioxolane; HC: Hollow carbon; rGO: Reduced graphene oxide
 
 

3. Summary and Outlook

(1) Coating sulfur with conductive materials, such as carbon materials, oxides, etc., to increase the conductivity of the cathode
material and speed up the battery charge and discharge process;
(2) Add salt to the electrolyte, such as NaCF3SO3, NaClO4, NaPF6, etc., or introduce electrolyte film-forming additives, such as vinyl ethylene carbonate (VEC) and Na2S/P2S5 to improve the electrolyte;
(3) Form solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) film on the surface of sodium to prevent the formation of sodium dendrites;
(4) Ion-selective modification of polymer separator or β-alumina solid electrolyte separator to inhibit the shuttle effect of polysulfides.

3. Summary and Outlook

This article, the working principle of room temperature sodium–sulfur battery, the existing challenges and the research results of its cathode, anode, separator and electrolyte to cope with these problems are stated.

Cathode research mainly focuses on improving the conductivity of sulfur, effective sulfur fixation and sodium inhibiting dendrites. Although various carbon-based mesoporous cathode bodies can increase the sulfur utilization rate and thereby increase the initial capacity, the cycle stability is not ideal, especially for long-term cycles. Therefore, in future research, carbon-based materials integrated with metal compounds, such as MOF, metal nitrides and metal oxides, can be further studied to eliminate unnecessary capacity degradation. At the same time, the sulfur equivalent cathode material is also a good choice for sodium–sulfur batteries. In addition, an independent binder-free cathode is also a good research idea. After removing the influence of the binder on the conductivity of the cathode material, the conductivity of the cathode will be improved.

Electrolyte is a key factor affecting the performance of sodium–sulfur batteries. The performance of carbonate-based electrolytes shows a relatively high capacity and has a different voltage curve without a different platform. The combination of an ionic liquid-based electrolyte and carbonate-based electrolyte has been proved to be a better choice. Combining ionic liquids and gels can obtain electrolytes with high conductivity, independent mechanical properties and dimensional stability, which may replace carbonate electrolytes.

The membrane with ion selectivity and physical adsorption will have a good inhibitory effect on the shuttle of polysulfides. Ordinary diaphragms cannot meet these requirements. The surface of the diaphragm must be modified to allow only Na+ to pass through. The modified diaphragm has an excellent capacity retention rate. It is also possible to add an intercalation layer between the diaphragm and the cathode to reduce electrical resistance while suppressing sulfur shuttle. Due to its nanosized frame and pores, the carbon nanofoam sandwich cannot only achieve the above-mentioned purpose, but also can digest volume expansion.

Since sodium dendrites will be generated on the surface of the sodium anode, which will cause a short circuit in the battery, sodium surface protection is necessary. Depositing Al2O3 layer atomic layer or molecular layer on sodium effectively inhibits the formation of sodium dendrites and prolongs the service life of sodium. Among them, MLD Al2O3 coating has better performance. In the future, MLD can be considered as an anode coating technology. In addition, other substances can be combined with sodium to form a composite anode to improve battery performance. The Na2S produced by sodium and some metal sulfides cannot only be used as an artificial SEI membrane to inhibit the growth of sodium dendrites, it can also be used as a 3D host of sodium, digesting the volume changes of sodium and greatly improving the stability of the sodium anode. In addition, it is also an effective idea for composite anodes to manufacture layered nanoboxes and combine the advantages of various hybrid configurations to improve sodium storage performance.

References

  1. Lu, X.; Kirby, B.W.; Xu, W.; Li, G.; Kim, J.Y.; Lemmon, J.P.; Sprenkle, V.L.; Yang, Z. Advanced intermediate-temperature Na–S battery. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 299–306.
  2. Li, T.; Xu, J.; Wang, C.; Wu, W.; Su, D.; Wang, G. The latest advances in the critical factors (positive electrode, electrolytes, separators) for sodium-sulfur battery. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 792, 797–817.
  3. Yu, X.; Manthiram, A. A Progress Report on Metal–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 3.
  4. Hueso, K.B.; Armand, M.; Rojo, T. High temperature sodium batteries: Status, challenges and future trends. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 734–749.
  5. Kumar, D.; Rajouria, S.K.; Kuhar, S.B.; Kanchan, D. Progress and prospects of sodium-sulfur batteries: A review. Solid State Ionics 2017, 312, 8–16.
  6. Ellis, B.L.; Nazar, L.F. Sodium and sodium-ion energy storage batteries. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2012, 16, 168–177.
  7. Marcoux, L.; Seo, E. Sodium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1975, 140, 3–15.
  8. Manthiram, A.; Yu, X. Ambient Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Batteries. Small 2015, 11, 2108–2114.
  9. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Su, Y.-S. Challenges and Prospects of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1125–1134.
  10. Palomares, V.; Serras, P.; Villaluenga, I.; Hueso, K.B.; Carretero-González, J.; Rojo, T. Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5884–5901.
  11. Weber, N.; Kummer, J.T. Sodium-Sulfur Secondary Battery. In Proceedings of the Power Sources Conference, Jacksonville, FL, USA, 7–10 June 2021.
  12. Yao, Y.F.Y.; Kummer, J.T. Ion exchange properties of and rates of ionic diffusion in beta-alumina. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1967, 29, 2453–2475.
  13. Wang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Palomares, V.; Shanmukaraj, D.; Sun, B.; Tang, X.; Wang, C.; Armand, M.; Rojo, T.; Wang, G. Revitalising sodium–sulfur batteries for non-high-temperature operation: A crucial review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3848–3879.
  14. Park, C.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Ryu, H.-S.; Kim, K.-W.; Ahn, H.-J. Room-Temperature Solid-State Sodium∕Sulfur Battery. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2006, 9, A123–A125.
  15. Adelhelm, P.; Hartmann, P.; Bender, C.L.; Busche, M.; Eufinger, C.; Janek, J. From lithium to sodium: Cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1016–1055.
  16. Du, W.; Wu, Y.; Yang, T.; Guo, B.; Liu, D.; Bao, S.-J.; Xu, M. Rational construction of rGO/VO2 nanoflowers as sulfur multifunctional hosts for room temperature Na-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379.
  17. Ye, C.; Chao, D.; Shan, J.; Li, H.; Davey, K.; Qiao, S.-Z. Unveiling the Advances of 2D Materials for Li/Na-S Batteries Experimentally and Theoretically. Matter 2020, 2, 323–344.
  18. Ryu, H.; Kim, T.; Kim, K.; Ahn, J.-H.; Nam, T.; Wang, G.; Ahn, H.-J. Discharge reaction mechanism of room-temperature sodium–sulfur battery with tetra ethylene glycol dimethyl ether liquid electrolyte. J. Power Source 2011, 196, 5186–5190.
  19. Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Nuli, Y.; Holze, R. Room temperature Na/S batteries with sulfur composite cathode materials. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 31–34.
  20. Park, C.-W.; Ryu, H.-S.; Kim, K.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Ahn, H.-J. Discharge properties of all-solid sodium–sulfur battery using poly (ethylene oxide) electrolyte. J. Power Source 2007, 165, 450–454.
  21. Momida, H.; Yamashita, T.; Oguchi, T. First-Principles Study on Structural and Electronic Properties of α-S and Na–S Crystals. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 83, 124713.
  22. Carter, R.; Oakes, L.; Douglas, A.; Muralidharan, N.; Cohn, A.P.; Pint, C.L. A Sugar-Derived Room-Temperature Sodium Sulfur Battery with Long Term Cycling Stability. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 1863.
  23. Hwang, T.H.; Jung, D.S.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, B.G.; Choi, J.W. One-Dimensional Carbon–Sulfur Composite Fibers for Na–S Rechargeable Batteries Operating at Room Temperature. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4532–4538.
  24. Wang, Y.-T.; Hao, Y.; Xu, L.-C.; Yang, Z.; Di, M.-Y.; Liu, R.-P.; Li, X.-Y. Insight into the Discharge Products and Mechanism of Room-Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries: A First-Principles Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 3988–3995.
  25. Wei, S.; Xu, S.; Agrawral, A.; Choudhury, S.; Lu, Y.; Tu, Z.; Ma, L.; Archer, L.A. A stable room-temperature sodium-sulfur battery. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11722.
  26. Ma, Q.; Du, G.; Guo, B.; Tang, W.; Li, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, C. Carbon-wrapped cobalt nanoparticles on graphene aerogel for solid-state room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 388, 124210.
  27. Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, Y. Failure analysis with a focus on thermal aspect towards developing safer Na-ion bat-teries. Chin. Phys. B 2020, 29, 47–54.
  28. Ma, D.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Mi, H.; Luo, S.; Deng, L.; Yan, C.; Rauf, M.; Zhang, P.; Sun, X.; et al. New Strategy for Polysulfide Protection Based on Atomic Layer Deposition of TiO2 onto Ferroelectric-Encapsulated Cathode: Toward Ultrastable Free-Standing Room Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705537.
  29. Wang, Y.-X.; Zhang, B.; Lai, W.; Xu, Y.; Chou, S. Room-Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Batteries: A Comprehensive Review on Research Progress and Cell Chemistry. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602829.
  30. Lee, D.-J.; Park, J.-W.; Hasa, I.; Sun, Y.-K.; Scrosati, B.; Hassoun, J. Alternative materials for sodium ion–sulphur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5256–5261.
  31. Xin, S.; Yin, Y.-X.; Guo, Y.-G.; Wan, L.-J. A High-Energy Room-Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Battery. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1261–1265.
  32. Bauer, I.; Kohl, M.; Althues, H.; Kaskel, S. Shuttle suppression in room temperature sodium–sulfur batteries using ion selective polymer membranes. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3208–3210.
  33. Zheng, S.; Han, P.; Han, Z.; Li, P.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J. Nano-Copper-Assisted Immobilization of Sulfur in High-Surface-Area Mesoporous Carbon Cathodes for Room Temperature Na-S Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 44.
  34. Yu, X.; Manthiram, A. Highly Reversible Room-Temperature Sulfur/Long-Chain Sodium Polysulfide Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1943–1947.
  35. Yu, X.; Manthiram, A. Room-Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries with Liquid-Phase Sodium Polysulfide Catholytes and Binder-Free Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Fabric Electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 22952–22959.
  36. Nagata, H.; Chikusa, Y. An All-solid-state Sodium–Sulfur Battery Operating at Room Temperature Using a High-sulfur-content Positive Composite Electrode. Chem. Lett. 2014, 43, 1333–1334.
  37. Kim, I.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, C.H.; Ahn, J.-P.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, K.-W.; Ahn, H.-J. A room temperature Na/S battery using a β″ alumina solid electrolyte separator, tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether electrolyte, and a S/C composite cathode. J. Power. Source 2016, 301, 332–337.
  38. Kim, I.; Kim, C.H.; Choi, S.H.; Ahn, J.-P.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, K.-W.; Cairns, E.J.; Ahn, H.-J. A singular flexible cathode for room temperature sodium/sulfur battery. J. Power Source 2016, 307, 31–37.
  39. Fan, L.; Ma, R.; Yang, Y.; Chen, S.; Lu, B. Covalent sulfur for advanced room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Nano. Energy 2016, 28, 304–310.
  40. Wang, Y.X.; Yang, J.; Lai, W.; Chou, S.L.; Gu, Q.F.; Liu, H.K.; Zhao, D.; Dou, S.X. Achieving High-Performance Room-Temperature Sodium-Sulfur Batteries With Mesoporous Carbon Hollow Nanospheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 16576–16579.
  41. Qiang, Z.; Chen, Y.-M.; Xia, Y.; Liang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Vogt, B.D. Ultra-long cycle life, low-cost room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries enabled by highly doped (N,S) nanoporous carbons. Nano. Energy 2017, 32, 59–66.
  42. Yu, X.; Manthiram, A. Performance Enhancement and Mechanistic Studies of Room-Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries with a Carbon-Coated Functional Nafion Separator and a Na2S/Activated Carbon Nanofiber Cathode. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 896–905.
  43. Yue, J.; Han, F.; Fan, X.; Zhu, X.; Ma, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, C. High-Performance All-Inorganic Solid-State Sodium-Sulfur Battery. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4885–4891.
  44. Ye, J.; Zhao, H.; Song, W.; Wang, N.; Kang, M.; Li, Z. Enhanced electronic conductivity and sodium-ion adsorption in N/S co-doped ordered mesoporous carbon for high-performance sodium-ion battery anode. J. Power Source 2019, 412, 606–614.
  45. Hwon-Gi, L.; Tae, L.J.; Kwangsup, E. Improving the Stability of an RT-NaS Battery via In Situ Electrochemical For-mation of Protective SEI on a Sulfur-Carbon Composite Cathode. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2018, 2, 1800076.
  46. Xu, X.; Zhou, D.; Qin, X.; Lin, K.; Kang, F.; Li, B.; Shanmukaraj, D.; Rojo, T.; Armand, M.; Wang, G. A room-temperature sodium–sulfur battery with high capacity and stable cycling performance. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–12.
  47. Zhang, B.; Sheng, T.; Wang, Y.; Chou, S.; Davey, K.; Dou, S.; Qiao, S. Long-Life Room-Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries by Virtue of Transition-Metal-Nanocluster–Sulfur Interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1484–1488.
  48. Li, S.; Zeng, Z.; Yang, J.; Han, Z.; Hu, W.; Wang, L.; Ma, J.; Shan, B.; Xie, J. High Performance Room Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Battery by Eutectic Acceleration in Tellurium-Doped Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 2956–2964.
  49. Zhu, T.; Dong, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.-G.; Wang, C.; Xia, Y.-Y. An All-Solid-State Sodium–Sulfur Battery Using a Sulfur/Carbonized Polyacrylonitrile Composite Cathode. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 5263–5271.
  50. Yan, Z.; Xiao, J.; Lai, W.; Wang, L.; Gebert, F.; Wang, Y.; Gu, Q.; Liu, H.; Chou, S.-L.; Liu, H.; et al. Nickel sulfide nanocrystals on nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanotubes with high-efficiency electrocatalysis for room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–8.
  51. Aslam, M.K.; Seymour, I.D.; Katyal, N.; Li, S.; Yang, T.; Bao, S.-J.; Henkelman, G.; Xu, M. Metal chalcogenide hollow polar bipyramid prisms as efficient sulfur hosts for Na-S batteries. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–11.
  52. Guo, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Lu, H.; Chang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, X.; Xia, Q.; Yan, C.; Xia, H. Ultrastable Sodium–Sulfur Batteries without Polysulfides Formation Using Slit Ultramicropore Carbon Carrier. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903246.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback