Toward Ghana Smart Land Management: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Bruce Ren and Version 4 by Bruce Ren.

Land acquisition in Ghana is fraught with challenges of multiple sales, numerous unofficial charges, unnecessary bureaucracies, intrusion of unqualified middlemen, and lack of transparency among others. Studies have suggested digitization as a way forward to improve Ghana’s land management system and to address these acquisition challenges. However, none of these studies have specifically provided a clear conceptual digital framework for land acquisition. This article applies an integrative review, mixed with strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, and deductive lessons from a digital land registry concept to develop a blockchain-based smart land acquisition framework solution in view of Ghana’s land acquisition challenges

  • smart land management
  • land acquisition process
  • public lands
  • customary lands
  • blockchain
  • Ghana
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Kuusaana, E.D.; Eledi, J.A. Customary land allocation, urbanization and land use planning in Ghana: Implications for food systems in the Wa Municipality. Land Use Policy 2015, 48, 454–466.
  2. Abubakari, Z.; Richter, C.; Zevenbergen, J. Exploring the “implementation gap” in land registration: How it happens that Ghana’s official registry contains mainly leaseholds. Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 539–554.
  3. Mabe, F.N.; Nashiru, S.; Mummuni, E.; Boateng, V.F. The nexus between land acquisition and household livelihoods in the Northern region of Ghana. Land Use Policy 2019, 85, 357–367.
  4. Quaye, B.A. Formal and Informal Land Institutions, Land Information Deficiencies, and the Development of Urban Land Markets in Ghana; University of Otago: Dunedin, New Zealand, 2014.
  5. Gyamera, E. Land Acquisition in Ghana; Dealing with the Challenges and the Way Forward. J. Agric. Econ. 2018, 6, 664–672.
  6. Deininger, K. Incidence and Impact of Land Conflict in Uganda; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  7. Nkurunziza, E. Informal mechanisms for accessing and securing urban land rights: The case of Kampala, Uganda. Environ. Urban. 2007, 66, 509–526.
  8. Sifuna, N. Public regulation of the use of private land: Opportunities and challenges in Kenya. Law Env’t Dev. 2009, 5, 38.
  9. Chitonge, H.; Mfune, O.; Umar, B.B.; Kajoba, G.M.; Banda, D.; Ntsebeza, L. Silent privatisation of customary land in Zambia: Opportunities for a few, challenges for many. Soc. Dyn. 2017, 43, 82–102.
  10. Elong, S.; Muhwezi, L.; Acai, J. Assessment of the Challenges and Effects of Delays in Compulsory Land Acquisition on the Performance of Road Construction Projects in Uganda. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2019, 10, 1409–1426.
  11. Chimhowu, A. The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm. Land Use Policy 2019, 81, 897–903.
  12. Amone, C.; Lakwo, C. Customary Land Ownership and Underdevelopment in Northern Uganda. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Res. 2014, 2, 117–125.
  13. Udoka, I.S. Effect of Land Titles Registration on Property Investment in Nigeria. Int. J. Adv. Stud. Econ. Public Sect Manag. 2017, 5, 81–94.
  14. Government of Ghana. Constitution of the Fourth Republic of Ghana; Government of Ghana: Accra, Ghana, 1993.
  15. Kwofie, T.E.; Afranie, I. Land Acquisition Challenges for Urban Housing Development in Ghana. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Applied Research Conference by Koforidua Polytechnic, Koforidua, Ghana, 2–5 July 2013; pp. 2–5.
  16. Ehwi, R.J.; Asante, L.A. Ex-Post Analysis of Land Title Registration in Ghana Since 2008 Merger: Accra Lands Commission in Perspective. SAGE Open 2016, 6.
  17. Mintah, K.; Baako, K.T.; Kavaarpuo, G.; Otchere, G.K. Skin lands in Ghana and application of blockchain technology for acquisition and title registration. J. Prop. Plan. Environ. Law 2020, 12, 147–169.
  18. Maha-Atma, S.P. Customary Land Tenure Practices and Land Markets in Ghana; Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology: Kumasi, Ghana, 2014.
  19. Mireku, K.O.; Kuusaana, D.E.; Kidido, K.J. Legal implications of allocation papers in land transactions in Ghana—A case study of the Kumasi traditional area. Land Use Policy 2016, 50, 148–155.
  20. Ameyaw, P.D.; de Vries, W.T. Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective. Land 2020, 9, 491.
  21. Oberdorf, V. Building Blocks for Land Administration: The Potential Impact of Blockchain-Based Land Administration Platforms in Ghana. Master’s Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2017.
  22. Agbesi, S.; Tahiru, F. Application of Blockchain Technology in Land Administration in Ghana. In Cross-Industry Use of Blockchain Technology and Opportunities for the Future; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 103–116.
  23. Benbunan-Fich, R.; Castellanos, A. Digitalization of land records: From paper to blockchain. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information System, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–16 December 2018; pp. 1–9.
  24. Ekemode, B.G.; Olapade, D.; Shiyanbola, E. Resolving the Land Title Registration Debacle: The Blockchain Technology Option. In Proceedings of the 2019 Environmental Design and Management International Conference, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, 10 January 2019; pp. 739–747.
  25. de Vries, W.T.; Bugri, J.; Mandhu, F. Advancing Responsible and Smart Land Management. In Responsible and Smart Land Management Interventions: An African Context; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 279–285.
  26. Chigbu, U.E.; de Vries, W.T.; Duran, P.D.; Schopf, A.; Bendzko, T. Advancing collaborative research in responsible and smart land management in and for Africa: The ADLAND Model. In Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC, USA, 19–23 March 2018; pp. 19–23.
  27. Zevenbergen, J.; de Vries, W.T.; Bennett, R.M. Future Directions in Responsible Land Administration. In Advances in Responsible Land Administration; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 271–277.
  28. Lü, D.; Gao, G.; Lü, Y.; Xiao, F.; Fu, B. Detailed land use transition quantification matters for smart land management in drylands: An in-depth analysis in Northwest China. Land Use Policy 2010, 90, 104356.
  29. Chiiweshe, M.; Mutopo, P.; Ncube, M.J.; Mutondoro, F. An Analysis of Transparency and Accountability in Land Sector Governance in Zimbabwe; Transparency International Zimbabwe: Harrare, Zimbabwe, 2013.
  30. Chun, S.A.; Kim, D.; Cho, J.S.; Chuang, M.; Shin, S.; Jun, D. Framework for Smart City Model Composition: Choice of Component Design Models and Risks. Int. J. EPlan. Res. 2021, 10, 50–69.
  31. Miscione, G.; Richter, C.; Ziolkowski, R. Authenticating Deeds/Organizing Society Considerations for Blockchain- Based Land Registries. In Responsible and Smart Land Management Interventions: An African Context; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 133–147.
  32. Crosby, M.; Pattanayak, P.; Verma, S.; Kalyanaraman, V. BlockChain Technology: Beyond Bitcoin. Appl. Innov. Rev. 2016, 2, 71.
  33. Karamitsos, I.; Papadaki, M.; Al Barghuthi, N.B. Design of the Blockchain Smart Contract: A Use Case for Real Estate. J. Inf. Secur. 2018, 9, 177–190.
  34. Veuger, J. Trust in a viable real estate economy with disruption and blockchain. Facilities 2018, 36, 103–120.
  35. Xu, M.; Chen, X.; Kou, G. A systematic review of blockchain. Financ. Innov. 2019, 5, 27.
  36. Shang, Q.; Price, A. A Blockchain-Based Land Titling Project in the Republic of Georgia: Rebuilding Public Trust and Lessons for Future Pilot Projects. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob. 2019, 12, 72–78.
  37. Collindres, J.; Regan, M.; Panting, G. Using Blockchain to Secure Honduran Land Titles; Fundacion Eleutera: San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 2016.
  38. Vos, J.; Lemmen, C.; Beentjes, B. Blockchain-Based Land Administration Feasible, Illusory or a Panacea? In Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC, USA, 20–24 March 2017; pp. 1–27.
  39. Lemieux, V.L. Evaluating the Use of Blockchain in Land Transactions: An Archival Science Perspective. Eur. Prop. Law J. 2017, 6, 392–440.
  40. Kempe, M. The Land Registry in the Blockchain—Testbed. A Development Project with Lantmäteriet, Landshypotek Bank, SBAB, Telia Company, ChromaWay and Kairos Future; Kairos Future: Stockholm, Sweden, 2017.
  41. Goderdzishvili, N.; Gordadze, E.; Gagnidze, N. Georgia’s blockchain-powered property registration: Never blocked, always secured—Ownership data kept best! In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Galway, Ireland, 4–6 April 2018; pp. 673–675.
  42. Thakur, V.; Doja, M.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Ahmad, T.; Khadanga, G. Land records on Blockchain for implementation of Land Titling in India. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 101940.
  43. Lazuashvili, N.; Norta, A.; Draheim, D. Integration of Blockchain Technology into a Land Registration System for Immutable Traceability: A Casestudy of Georgia. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 361, pp. 219–233.
  44. Khan, R.; Ansari, S.; Jain, S.; Sachdeva, S. Blockchain based land registry system using Ethereum Blockchain. J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol. 2020, XII, 3640–3648.
  45. Ramya, U.M.; Sindhuja, P.; Atsaya, R.A.; Dharani, B.B. Reducing Forgery in Land Registry System Using Blockchain Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 725–734.
  46. Kaczorowska, M. Blockchain-based Land Registration: Possibilities and Challenges. Masaryk. Univ. J. Law Technol. 2019, 13, 339–360.
  47. Eder, G. Digital Transformation: Blockchain and Land Titles. In Proceedings of the OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum, Paris, France, 20–21 March 2019.
  48. Rizal Batubara, F.; Ubacht, J.; Janssen, M. Unraveling transparency and accountability in blockchain. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 18–20 June 2019; pp. 204–213.
  49. Shuaib, M.; Daud, S.M.; Alam, S.; Khan, W.Z. Blockchain-based framework for secure and reliable land registry system. Telkomnika 2020, 18, 2560–2571.
  50. Ali, T.; Nadeem, A.; Alzahrani, A.; Jan, S. A Transparent and Trusted Property Registration System on Permissioned Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advances in the Emerging Computing Technologies (AECT), Madinah, Saudi Arabia, 8–10 December 2019; pp. 1–6.
  51. Torun, A. Hierarchical Blockchain Architecture for a Relaxed Hegemony on Cadastre Data Management and Update: A Case Study for Turkey. In Proceedings of the UCTEA International Geographical Information Systems Congress, Adana, Turkey, 15–18 November 2017; pp. 15–18.
  52. Themistocleous, M. Blockchain Technology and Land Registry. Cyprus Rev. 2018, 30, 195–202.
  53. McMurren, J.; Young, A.; Verhulst, S. Addressing Transaction Costs Through Blockchain and Identity in Swedish Land Transfers. In Blockchain Technologies for Social Change; GovLab: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  54. Lemmen, C.; Vos, J.; Beentjes, B. Ongoing Development of Land Administration Standards. Eur. Prop. Law J. 2017, 6, 478–502.
  55. Müller, H.; Seifert, M. Blockchain, a Feasible Technology for Land Administration? In Proceedings of the FIG Work Week 2019, Geospatial Information for a Smarter Life and Environmental Resilience, Hanoi, Vietnam, 22–26 April 2019.
  56. Tilbury, J.L.; de la Rey, E. Business Process Models of Blockchain and South African Real Estate Transactions. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD), Winterton, South Africa, 5–6 August 2019; pp. 1–7.
  57. Antwi, A.Y.; Adams, J. Rent-seeking Behaviour and its Economic Costs in Urban Land Transactions in Accra, Ghana. Urban Stud. 2003, 40, 2083–2098.
  58. Danso, H.; Manu, D. High Cost of Materials and Land Acquisition Problems in the Construction Industry in Ghana. Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2013, 3, 18–33.
  59. Nara, B.B.; Mwingyine, D.T.; Boamah, N.A.; Biitir, S.B. Enhancing Efficiency in Land Management through the Customary Land Secretariats (CLSs) in Upper West Region, Ghana. Dev. Ctry. Stud. 2014, 4, 24–31.
  60. Edrees, Z. An Overview of Blockchain Technology in Government Sectors Use Cases, Benefits and Challenges. Global Sci. J. 2019, 7, 845–856.
  61. Janssen, M.; Weerakkody, V.; Ismagilova, E.; Sivarajah, U.; Irani, Z. A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 50, 302–309.
  62. Index. Available online: (accessed on 7 January 2021).
  63. Broni, F.E.J. Blockchain Technology Readiness in Firms: Idustry Experts’ Perspectives from a Developing Economy; University of Ghana: Accra, Ghana, 2019.
  64. Gobal Land Tool Network. Land Tenure Security in Selected Countries; Global Report; United Nations Human Settlements Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2015.
  65. Ali, D.A.; Deininger, K.; Duponchel, M. New Ways to Assess and Enhance Land Registry Sustainability: Evidence from Rwanda. World Dev. 2017, 99, 377–394.
  66. Thontteh, E.; Omirin, M. Land registration within the framework of land administration reform in Lagos state. Pac. Rim Prop. Res. J. 2015, 21, 161–177.
  67. Greiner, C. Pastoralism and Land-Tenure Change in Kenya: The Failure of Customary Institutions. Dev. Chang. 2017, 48, 78–97.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback