You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Legumes: source of bioactive compounds: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Lily Guo and Version 1 by Mercedes M. Pedrosa.

Legumes have been consumed since ancient times all over the world due to their easy cultivation and availability as a low-cost food. Nowadays, it is well known that pulses are also a good source of bioactive phytochemicals that play an important role in the health and well-being of humans when ingested on a regular basis, reducing the incidence of several chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases or some types of cancer; thus, pulses are recognized as functional foods. These health effects may be associated with more than one bioactive compound, and synergistic combinations may exist, moreover, these bioactive substances are not equally present in all legumes (seeds and varieties). It is noteworthy that processing of pulses or pulse-based mixtures can also increase, reduce/inactivate, or produce minor changes in the content of other non-nutritive components such as protease inhibitors, galactosides, lectins, phenols or phytates.

  • Legumes
  • bioactive compounds
  • extrusion
  • autoclaving
  • prebiotics
  • galactosides
  • phytates
  • protease inhibitors
  • phenolic compounds
  • healthy effects

1. Introduction

Pulses, which are the dry seeds, separated from their pod, of the Leguminosae family, have been cultivated and consumed for centuries as a staple food for humans. The most common pulses consumed by humans around the world are peas, lentils, beans, soybeans, faba beans, lupins, cowpeas and mung beans

[1][2][3]

. From a nutritional point of view, they are highly valuable foods since they are high in protein (17–50%), slow-digestion carbohydrates (0.4–55%) and dietary fiber (3–15%), and low in fat (0.8–6.6%) (except the oil seeds: soybeans, peanuts and some lupins)

[1][2][3]

. Their proteins complement those of cereals well and are gluten-free, being a food of choice for celiacs; furthermore, the demand for pulses has increased recently since more people such as vegetarians, vegans or flexitarians are looking for alternative sources of animal proteins

[4][5]

. Pulses are cheap, easy to prepare, versatile and in many cases, non-perishable

[6]

. The growing interest in pulses as both nutritious and healthy foods, led the WHO/FAO to declare 2016 as the “International Year of Pulses”

[7]

, with its main objective to raise awareness of the multiple varieties and benefits of pulses for food security, nutrition, health and environment, and to encourage consumption. In addition, the dietary guidelines of many countries

[8]

recommend the consumption of 2.5–2.5 cups of pulses per week as part of a healthy diet.

In addition to nutritive compounds, pulses contain numerous phytochemicals, traditionally considered as anti-nutritional factors, and in recent decades as non-nutritional components; although most of them are non-toxic for humans, they can produce some discomfort (e.g., flatulence) and interfere with protein digestibility and the bioavailability of some nutrients such as minerals

[3][6][9]

. However, nowadays these phytochemicals are well recognized as bioactive compounds able to exert a beneficial/healthy effect when ingested on a regular basis, reducing the incidence of several chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases or some types of cancer; thus, pulses are recognized as functional foods

[6][9]

. These health effects may be associated with more than one bioactive compound, and synergistic combinations may exist

[3][6][9][10]

. These bioactive substances are not equally present in all legumes (seeds and varieties); for example, the common bean shows the highest levels of lectins, while soybean is rich in trypsin inhibitors, and peas contain higher amounts of α-galactosides

[9][11]

. According to different authors

[3][9]

, depending on the compound, its concentration in the food, the time at which it is consumed and its interaction with other food matrix components, these compounds can act as anti-nutrients or as bioactive compounds Therefore, depending on the compound, it may be desirable to reduce or increase its content but not remove it completely from food products

[3][9][11]

. It is noteworthy that processing of pulses or pulse-based mixtures can also increase, reduce/inactivate or produce minor changes in the content of other non-nutritive components such as protease inhibitors, galactosides, lectins, phenols or phytates

[1][5][12][13][14][15][16]

. Although the beneficial effects of these components mainly depend on their bioavailability in the gut, and since there currently is not a recommended daily intake of bioactive compounds, it would be of great interest to know the level of each bioactive compound to be consumed in the processed foods, because processing can disrupt the food matrix, making phytochemicals more or less bioaccessible

[17]

.

There are a number of processing techniques available, such as soaking, dehulling, germination, malting, fermentation, cooking, autoclaving, microwaving, roasting or extrusion, that make it possible to achieve the suitable nutritional and organoleptic characteristics of pulses, as well as to improve the content of bioactive compounds in comparison with the raw products. Different processing methods can affect, to a different extent, the content of a specific compound. Soaking is very effective in reducing water-soluble compounds such as oligosaccharides and some phenolic compounds. Germination reduces phytic acid effectively, while cooking is more effective in reducing bioactive compounds that are heat-labile, such as protease inhibitors and lectins

[9]

. In relation to the phytochemical content of the processed pulses, there is a great variability in the literature on the data for the same processing method

[5][9][12][18][19][20]

. For example, for a specific compound, some authors report contradictory findings. In general, the final effect of a processing method depends on the pulse type and variety, the processing parameters (mainly amount of water, temperature and time), the food matrix structure, the chemical nature of each phytochemical and the presence of additional compounds that may protect each other during processing

[3][9][11][21]

.

2. Content of Some Bioactive Compounds in Raw Pulses and Their Health Effects in Humans

2.1. α-Galactosides

The most common oligosaccharides in pulse seeds are α-galactosides or the raffinose family of oligosaccharides (raffinose, stachyose, verbascose and ajugose), raffinose and stachyose being the most ubiquitous sugars. Some authors

[3][5][6][9][10][22]

have reviewed the content of α-galactosides in different seeds and varieties, ranging from 0.4 to 16.1% (dry matter—d.m). Singh et al.

[11]

reported that lentils presented the lowest amount of total galactosides (37.5 mg/g), followed by faba beans (52.0 mg/g), beans (60.9 mg/g) and peas (66.3 mg/g). Muzquiz et al.

[9]

reported concentrations of raffinose, ciceritol, stachyose and verbascose in different varieties of Spanish beans, peas, chickpeas, faba beans, soybeans and lupins; raffinose ranged from 1.0 mg/g in

Phaseolus vulgaris

var. Palmeña to 32.15 mg/g in

Lupinus mariae-josephi

; stachyose varied from 9.22 mg/g in

Vicia faba

var. Alameda to 59.08 mg/g in

Lupinus albus

var Multolupa. Verbascose was not detected in the reported chickpeas, the highest amount being found in

Pisum sativum

var. Luna (50.25 mg/g). Another α-galactoside is ciceritol, an α-D-digalactoside of pinitol that does not belong to the raffinose family of oligosaccharides. It is not present in all pulses, and its amount ranged from 1.61 mg/g to 29.65 mg/g in pea var. Iceberg and chickpea var. Duraton, respectively.

The α-galactosides are not digested or hydrolyzed by humans. However, they are fermented by colonic bacteria with the production of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), mainly butyric and propionic. While the gases produced are responsible for flatulence, bloating and diarrhea, the SCFA are mainly related to the prebiotic effect associated with the α-galactosides, promoting the growth of beneficial gut microflora (bifidobacterias and lactobacilli) and reducing the enterobacteria population. α-Galactosides have also been shown to help in normalizing bowel function, reducing potentially carcinogenic compounds (such as N-nitroso compounds), and enhancing the immune system and increasing resistance to infection

[3][9][11][23]

. In addition, it has also been reported that propionic acid reduces serum cholesterol, helping to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, and butyric acid induces apoptosis and stops the growth and differentiation in colon cancer cells

[3][9][11]

. Despite there not being a recommended dietary intake for α-galactosides, Martinez-Villaluenga et al.

[23]

documented that a dose of 3 g/day of α-galactosides produces an increase in the intestinal bacteroides, bifidobacterias and eubacteria without any flatulence discomfort.

2.2. Myo-Inositol Phosphates

Phytate (IP6) or myo-inositol hexakisphosphate is the main form of phosphorous storage in pulse seeds (up to 75% of total seed phosphorous), and is stored as salts (phytate–mineral complex) or bound with proteins or starch

[3][9]

. According to the literature, the total content of inositol phosphates ranges from 0.2 to 2.34%

[3][9][10][11][22]

, and as described above for α-galactosides, the amount of inositol phosphates varies between species and varieties, as well as with the soil phosphorous

[24]

. Sparvoli et al.

[3]

reported that varieties of peas (2.1–7.1 mg/g), chickpeas (2.8–12.6 mg/g), lentils (2.5–12.2 mg/g) and mung beans (1.8–5.8 mg/g) contain relatively lower amounts of IP6 than those of common beans (2.4–28.7 mg/g), faba beans (5.9–15.0 mg/g) and soybeans (4.8–20.1 mg/g). Muzquiz et al.

[9]

reported the total inositol phosphate content in different varieties of some Spanish legumes, the average content being 0.4% in beans, 0.75% in faba beans, 0.6% in chickpeas and beans, 0.7% in lupins and 1.2% in soybean varieties.

In general, phytate, myo-inositol hexaphosphate or IP6 has been considered as an antinutrient that interferes with nutrient (mineral, protein and starch) digestibility and bioavailability

[25]

. However, this mechanism of action also produces health benefits. As IP6 binds starch and the calcium necessary for α-amylase activity, the starch digestibility is reduced, improving the glycaemic response of pulses and the management of diabetes type 2

[3][22]

. Due to its mineral-binding capacity, IP6 has been linked with other beneficial health effects, such as the prevention of kidney stone formation, the prevention of cavities and plaque in teeth and protection from demineralization. It has been also reported that a diet with 1% sodium phytate added can control hypercholesterolaemia and atherosclerosis, and can reduce the risk of colon cancer and improve irritable bowel syndrome

[26][27]

. Further, it has been reported that the lower phosphorylated forms (IP5–IP3) can promote the absorption of minerals and show strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, inducing apoptosis and normalizing abnormal cell proliferation

[3][9][26][22]

. In addition, some authors

[28][29]

have reported that iron absorption can be improved when IP6 is below 10 mg/g protein in one serving dose.

2.2. Protease Inhibitors

2.3. Protease Inhibitors

Protease inhibitors in legumes belong to the Kunitz and the Bowman–Birk families, and both are capable of inhibiting trypsin and chymotrypsin enzymes. There is a high number of isoforms of both inhibitors that vary with the legume species and variety

[30]

. The trypsin inhibitor content ranges from 5.75 to 15 trypsin inhibitor units (TIU)/mg in peas, from 5 to 10 TIU/mg in faba beans, from 12.60 to 19 TIU/mg in chickpeas, from 3 to 8 TIU/mg in lentils and from 8.57 to 82.70 TIU/mg in soybeans

[9][19]

; while the chymotrypsin inhibitor content varies from 2.19 chymotrypsin inhibitor units (CIU)/mg in

Vicia narbonensis

to 17.30 CIU/mg in bean var. Riñón, but is not detected in soybean var. Ostrumi

[9][10]

. Protease inhibitors have a negative effect on animal growth due to the inhibition of gut protein digestion. However, in a Western diet, there have not been any reported toxic problems related to the intake of these compounds, mainly because pulses are cooked prior to consumption and protease inhibitors are thermal-labile compounds. Over the past two decades, different studies

[3][6][9][26][22][31][32]

have shown that protease inhibitors are effective in preventing or reducing colon, lung, liver, prostate and breast cancer progression. Sánchez-Chino et al.

[22]

reported that some possible mechanisms of action are: (i) the reduction of protein digestibility reduces the availability of essential amino acids for the cancer cells; (ii) the protease inhibitors act as insoluble dietary fiber able to absorb carcinogens (such as free radicals) in the gut; and (iii) the inhibiting of proteases produced by cancer cells. Even though there is not a recommended amount of protease inhibitor consumption, it is important to note that the traditional Japanese diet contains about 420 protease inhibitor units/day; further, it has been reported that the consumption of the purified protease inhibitor at 25–800 CIU per day during a period of 12 weeks exerted a protective effect against cancer development, and doses of up to 2000 CIU/day did not cause health problems in humans

[9][10][11][26][31][32][33][34][35]

.

2.4. Phenolic Compounds

Pulses are rich in phenolic compounds and include different subcategories such as tannins, flavonoids, isoflavones, phenolic acids (such as caffeic, ferulic, sinapic and p-coumaric acids) and anthocyanins. Many of these compounds are located in the seed coat and are responsible for seed color, and are related to the taste and flavor of seeds. In general, the darkest legume varieties tend to have higher amounts of phenolic compounds than the light seeds/varieties

[3][11][36][37]

. Even though a great variability in the phenolic content can be found due to the different methods used in their extraction and quantification (spectrophotometrically or by HPLC (high-performance chromatography)), in general, a high variability can be found among legumes and varieties

[5][38][37][39][40][41][42]

. For example, among beans, there can be found values from 0.3 mg/g of phenolic compounds in white varieties to 12.6 mg/g in black varieties; peas show values from 0.6 to 2.7 mg/g and chickpeas from 0.6 to 2.7 mg/g

[19]

. Pedrosa et al.

[5]

reported that the raw Curruquilla bean, a cream-colored variety, shows a higher content of total phenols and anthocyanins (2.70 mg/g and 40.10 µg/g) than the Almonga bean (2.38 mg/g and 38.47 µg/g), a white variety. Some authors

[38][41]

reviewed the phenolic content of various legume seeds and documented contents from 11.2 to 48.3 mg/g in dry beans, from 117.8 to 157.6 mg/g in different faba bean genotypes, from 4.9 to 68 mg/g in lentils and from 0.98 to 183 mg/g in chickpeas. Condensed tannins are associated with an astringent taste, as well as with some anti-nutritional effects due to their ability to bind and precipitate proteins, reducing their digestibility. However, from a health point of view, different studies found in the literature report phenolic compounds as bioactive molecules with antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticarcinogenic, immunomodulating, cardio-protective, anti-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory properties, lowering the risk of colon cancer and osteoporosis

[6][10][26][37][41]

. Most of these actions are linked to the antioxidant and antiradical activities of the different phenolic compounds. In general, antioxidant activity is positively correlated with total phenolic content

[41]

. Cardador-Martinez et al.

[43]

reported that white beans possess low antioxidative activity in comparison to black, brown and red bean varieties. As documented in some reviews

[11][41]

, different authors related this high antioxidant activity to pro-anthocyanidins or condensed tannins, as well as to flavonoid content, and concluded that pulses can be a useful natural source of antioxidants. Zhang et al.

[44]

reported that lentil phenols also inhibit glucosidase and lipase, and would therefore contribute to controlling blood glucose levels and obesity in humans. In spite of these health benefits, there is not in fact a recommended daily intake of phenolic compounds, mainly due to the differences in their total intake for the overall population; however, some reports recommend a minimum daily dose of 300 mg of total phenolic compounds to benefit from their health properties

[45]

.

3. Effect of processing (autoclaving or extrusion) on the bioactive compounds of pulses

It is well known that pulses are an inexpensive and sustainable source of nutrients and they represent functional foods that are rich in different bioactive compounds, providing many health benefits when consumed regularly in a balanced diet. Pulses are processed prior to their consumption; therefore, even though a pulse seed contains a high amount of bioactive compounds, it does not mean that the processed pulse has a high content of the bioactive components because their processing modifies their content. The extent of these modifications depends on the seed, the variety, the food matrix, the formulations, and the technological processing. Galactosides were reduced up to 77%, 68% and 82% in autoclaved, extrusion/cooked and cold-extruded plus cooking samples, respectively. Although some paper reported an increase in some of the extrusion/cooking processed samples. Myoinositol phosphates were more affected by autoclaving and extrusion/cooking, reaching reduction between 2-100% and 1-99%, respectively. Cooked pasta reduced their content up to 15%. All the processed reviewed reduced drastically the protease inhibitors content (80-100%), therefore it can be concluded that these samples would show an improved protein digestibility. The majority of the revised papers reported a reduction of the phenolic compounds up to 80%, 99% and 51% for autoclaved, extrusion/cooking and col-extruded/cooked products. One serving of autoclaved legumes, extruded/cooked and cold-extruded/cooked products can supply on average 3.2, 1.8 and 1.3 g of galactosides, and even though there is no a recommended daily intake, according to the literature it would be enough to obtain prebiotic benefits on gut. Considering one serving of each product and depending on the legume seed and the processing conditions some of the processed legumes could supply less than 10 mg/g protein and thus improving the mineral absorption. The low remaining trypsin inhibitor activity (<1 to 1.5 TIU/mg) in the processed legumes included in this review would have a positive effect in human health. One serving of majority of the revised product can supply more than the minimum daily dose (300 mg) of total phenolic compounds to obtain health benefits. Therefore, from the research documented in this review, it can be concluded that processed pulses and pulse-based foods can supply not only nutritive compounds but also significant amounts of bioactive compounds such as galactosides, phytates, protease inhibitors and phenolic compounds with the potential to contribute to human health and wellbeing. Notably, the health benefits reported for legumes including anticarcinogenic and antihypertensive effects, and improvements in cardiovascular disease, diabetes type 2 and obesity could be related to a synergistic combination of the bioactive components present in legume seeds. With the increasing innovations in food processing technology, the use of pulses in the development of new food products can meet the consumer’s requirements for more nutritious and healthier products. Finally, noteworthy that it is interesting not only to know the phytochemical content on the processed legumes but also it is necessary to know which amount of these compounds are available in the gut or once they are absorbed to exert their beneficial effect. In the near future, it would be necessary to carry out in vitro digestibility studies that allows to determine which is the amount that reach the gut and is available to exert their healthy effect.

 

References

  1. Boye, J.; Zare, F.; Pletch, A. Pulse proteins: Processing, characterization, functional properties and applications in food and feed. Food Research International 2010, 43, 414-431, doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.003.
  2. Duranti, M. Grain legume proteins and nutraceutical properties. Fitoterapia 2006, 77, 67-82, doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.008.
  3. Sparvoli, F.; Bollini, R.; Cominelli, E. Nutritional Value. In Grain Legumes, Ron, A.M.D., Ed. Springer: NY, 2015; 10.1007/978-1-4939-2797-5pp. 291-326.
  4. Dogan, H.; Gueven, A.; Hicsasmaz, Z. Extrusion Cooking of Lentil Flour (Lens Culinaris–Red)–Corn Starch–Corn Oil Mixtures. International Journal of Food Properties 2013, 16, 341-358, doi:10.1080/10942912.2011.551866.
  5. Pedrosa, M.M.; Cuadrado, C.; Burbano, C.; Muzquiz, M.; Cabellos, B.; Olmedilla-Alonso, B.; Asensio-Vegas, C. Effects of industrial canning on the proximate composition, bioactive compounds contents and nutritional profile of two Spanish common dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chemistry 2015, 166, 68-75, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.158.
  6. Maphosa, Y.; Jideani, V.A. The Role of Legumes in Human Nutrition. In Functional Food - Improve Health through Adequate Food, Hueda, M.C., Ed. IntechOpen: 2017; http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69127.
  7. FAO. Resolution 68/231. International Year of Pulses, 2016. Availabe online: http://www.fao.org/ (accessed on May 2020).
  8. US Dietary, G.f.A. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: 2005; Vol. 2011.
  9. Muzquiz, M.; Varela, A.; Burbano, C.; Cuadrado, C.; Guillamon, E.; Pedrosa, M.M. Bioactive compounds in legumes: pronutritive and antinutritive actions. Implications for nutrition and health. Phytochemistry Reviews 2012, 11, 227-244, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-012-9233-9.
  10. Carbonaro, M. 14 - Role of pulses in nutraceuticals. In Pulse Foods, Tiwari, B.K., Gowen, A., McKenna, B., Eds. Academic Press: San Diego, 2011; 10.1016/B978-0-12-382018-1.00014-9pp. 385-418.
  11. Singh, B.; Singh, J.P.; Shevkani, K.; Singh, N.; Haur, A. Bioactive constituents in pulses and their health benefits. Journal Food Science and Technology 2017, 54, 858-870, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2391-9.
  12. Aguilera, Y.; Diaz, M.F.; Jimenez, T.; Benitez, V.; Herrera, T.; Cuadrado, C.; Martin-Pedrosa, M.; Martin-Cabrejas, M.A. Changes in nonnutritional factors and antioxidant activity during germination of non-conventional legumes. Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry 2013, 10.1021/jf4022652 [doi], doi:10.1021/jf4022652 [doi].
  13. Berrios, J. Extrusion Cooking: Legume Pulses. In Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food, and Biological Engineering, Second Edition, CRC Press: 2010; doi:10.1081/E-EAFE2-120045683 10.1081/E-EAFE2-120045683pp 453-464.
  14. Carvalho, A.; de Andrade Mattietto, R.; Bassinello, P.; Nakamoto Koakuzu, S.; Rios, A.; Maciel, R.; Nunes Carvalho, R. Processing and characterization of extruded breakfast meal formulated with broken rice and bean flour. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2012, 32, 515-524, doi:10.1590/S0101-20612012005000073.
  15. Dueñas, M.; Sarmento, T.; Aguilera, Y.; Benitez, V.; Mollá, E.; Esteban, R.M.; Martín-Cabrejas, M.A. Impact of cooking and germination on phenolic composition and dietary fibre fractions in dark beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and lentils (Lens culinaris L.). LWT - Food Science and Technology 2016, 66, 72-78, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.025.
  16. El Siddig, O.; El Tinay, A.; Abd Alia, A.; Elkhalifa, A. Proximate composition, minerals, tannins, in vitro protein digestibility and effect of cooking on protein fractions of hyacinth bean (Dolichos lablab). Journal Food Science Technology 2002, 39, 111-115.
  17. Kamau, E.H.; Nkhata, S.G.; Ayua, E.O. Extrusion and nixtamalization conditions influence the magnitude of change in the nutrients and bioactive components of cereals and legumes. Food Science and Nutrition 2020, 8, 1753-1765, doi:10.1002/fsn3.1473.
  18. Arribas, C.; Cabellos, B.; Cuadrado, C.; Guillamón, E.; Pedrosa, M. The effect of extrusion on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of novel gluten-free expanded products based on carob fruit, pea and rice blends. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2019, 52, 100-107, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.12.003.
  19. Pasqualone, A.; Costantini, M.; Coldea, T.E.; Summo, C. Use of legumes in extrusion cooking: a review. Foods 2020, 9, 958-975, doi:10.3390/foods9070958.
  20. van Boekel, M.; Fogliano, V.; Pellegrini, N.; Stanton, C.; Scholz, G.; Lalljie, S.; Somoza, V.; Knorr, D.; Jasti, P.R.; Eisenbrand, G. A review on the beneficial aspects of food processing. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 2010, 54, 1215-1247, doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900608.
  21. Singh, S.; Gamlath, S.; Wakeling, L. Nutritional aspects of food extrusion: a review. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2007, 42, 916-929, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01309.x.
  22. Barman, A.; Marak, C.M.; Barman, R.M.; Sangma, C.S. Nutraceutical Properties of Legume Seeds and Their Impact on Human Health, Legume Seed Nutraceutical Research. In Legume Seed Nutraceutical Research, Jimenez-Lopez, J.C., Clemente, A., Eds. IntechOpen: 2018; 10.5772/intechopen.78799.
  23. Sanchez-Chino, X.; Jimenez-Martinez, C.; Davila-Ortiz, G.; Alvarez-Gonzalez, I.; Madrigal-Bujaidar, E. Nutrient and nonnutrient components of legumes, and its chemopreventive activity: a review. Nutrition and cancer 2015, 67, 401-410, doi:10.1080/01635581.2015.1004729.
  24. Amarowicz, R.; Pegg, R.B. Legumes as a source of natural antioxidants. European Journal Lipid Science Technology 2008, 110, 865-878, doi:10.1002/ejlt.200800114.
  25. Martínez-Villaluenga, C.; Frias, J.; Vidal-Valverde, C. Alpha-galactosides: antinutritional factors or functional ingredients? Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 2008, 48, 301-316, doi:10.1080/10408390701326243.
  26. Burbano, C.; Muzquiz, M.; Ayet, G.; Cuadrado, C.; Pedrosa, M.M. Evaluation of antinutritional factors of selected varieties of Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1999, 79, 1468-1472, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199908)79:11<1468::aid-jsfa387>3.0.co;2-g.
  27. Greiner, R.; Konietzny, U. Improving enzymatic reduction of myo-inositol phosphates with inhibitory effects on mineral absortion in black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris var. Preto). Journal Food Process Preservation 1999, 23, 249-261.
  28. Schlemmer, U.; Frølich, W.; Prieto, R.M.; Grases, F. Phytate in foods and significance for humans: Food sources, intake, processing, bioavailability, protective role and analysis. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 2009, 53, S330-S375, doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900099.
  29. Fredrikson, M.; Biot, P.; Alminger, M.; Carlsson, N.; Sandberg, A. Production Process for High-Quality Pea-Protein Isolate with Low Content of Oligosaccharides and Phytate. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2001, 49, 1208-1212, doi:10.1021/jf000708x.
  30. Hurrell, R.F.; Juillerat, M.A.; Reddy, M.B.; Lynch, S.R.; Dassenko, S.A.; Cook, J.D. Soy protein, phytate, and iron absorption in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992, 56, 573-578, doi:10.1093/ajcn/56.3.573.
  31. Guillamón, E.; Pedrosa, M.M.; Burbano, C.; Cuadrado, C.; Sánchez, M.C.; Muzquiz, M. The trypsin inhibitors present in seed of different grain legume species and cultivar. Food chemistry 2008, 107, 68-74, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.029.
  32. Clemente, A.; Mackenzie, D.; Johnson, I.T.; Domoney, C. Investigation of legume seed protease inhibitors as potential anticarcinogenic proteins. In Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds and oilseeds., M. Muzquiz C. Cuadrado, M.M.P., & C. Burbano, G D Hill, Ed. EAAP publication: Toledo (Spain), 2004; pp 137-142.
  33. Kennedy, A.R. Chemopreventive agents: protease inhibitors. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1998, 78, 167-209, doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(98)00010-2.
  34. Clemente, A.; Sonnante, G.; Domoney, C. Bowman-Birk Inhibitors from Legumes and Human Gastrointestinal Health: Current Status and Perspectives. Current Protein & Peptide Science 2011, 12, 358-373, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920311796391133.
  35. Kennedy, A.R. The Bowman-Birk inhibitor from soybeans as an anticarcinogenic agent. Am J Clin Nutr 1998, 68, 1406s-1412s, doi:10.1093/ajcn/68.6.1406S.
  36. Roy, F.; Boye, J.I.; Simpson, B.K. Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. Food Research International 2010, 43, 432-442, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.002.
  37. Anton, A.; Fulcher, R.; Arntfield, S. Physical and nutritional impact of fortification of corn starch based extruded snacks with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flour: Effects of bean addition and extrusion cooking. Food Chemistry 2009, 133, 989-996.
  38. Oomah, B.D.; Cardadro-Martínez, A.; Loarca-Piña, G. Phenolics and antioxidative activities in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal Science Food Agricultural 2005, 85, 935-942, doi:10.10027jfsa.2019.
  39. Amarowicz, R.; Estrella, I.; Hernández, T.; Robredo, S.; Troszyńska, A.; Kosińska, A.; Pegg, R.B. Free radical-scavenging capacity, antioxidant activity, and phenolic composition of green lentil (Lens culinaris). Food Chemistry 2010, 121, 705-711, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.009.
  40. Amarowicz, R.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidant activity of broad bean seed extract and its phenolic composition. Journal of Functional Foods 2017, 38, 656-662, doi:10.1016/j.jff.2017.04.002.
  41. Singh, B.; Singh, J.P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, N. Phenolic composition and antioxidant potential of grain legume seeds: A review. Food Research International 2017, 101, 1-16, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.026.
  42. Yeo, J.; Shahidi, F. Identification and quantification of soluble and insoluble-bound phenolics in lentil hulls using HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and their antioxidant potential. Food Chemistry 2020, 315, 126202, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126202.
  43. Cardador-Martinez, A.; Castano-Tostado, E.; Loarca-Pina, G. Antimutagenic activity of natural phenolic compounds present in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) against aflatoxin B1. Food Addit Contam 2002, 19, 62-69, doi:10.1080/02652030110062110 [doi].
  44. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Kim, S.H.; Hagerman, A.E.; Lü, J. Anti-cancer, anti-diabetic and other pharmacologic and biological activities of penta-galloyl-glucose. Pharmaceutical Research 2009, 26, 2066-2080, doi:10.1007/s11095-009-9932-0.
  45. Del Bo', C.; Bernardi, S.; Marino, M.; Porrini, M.; Tucci, M.; Guglielmetti, S.; Cherubini, A.; Carrieri, B.; Kirkup, B.; Kroon, P., et al. Systematic Review on Polyphenol Intake and Health Outcomes: Is there Sufficient Evidence to Define a Health-Promoting Polyphenol-Rich Dietary Pattern? Nutrients 2019, 11, doi:10.3390/nu11061355.
More
Academic Video Service