PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 in Cancer: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Vivi Li and Version 2 by Krzysztof Kotowski.

Glycolysis is a crucial metabolic process in rapidly proliferating cells such as cancer cells. Phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK-1) is a key rate-limiting enzyme of glycolysis. Its efficiency is allosterically regulated by numerous substances occurring in the cytoplasm. However, the most potent regulator of PFK-1 is fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F-2,6-BP), the level of which is strongly associated with 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase activity (PFK-2/FBPase-2, PFKFB). PFK-2/FBPase-2 is a bifunctional enzyme responsible for F-2,6-BP synthesis and degradation. Four isozymes of PFKFB (PFKFB1, PFKFB2, PFKFB3, and PFKFB4) have been identified. Alterations in the levels of all PFK-2/FBPase-2 isozymes have been reported in different diseases. 

  • PFKFB3
  • PFKFB4
  • PFK-2
  • 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2
  • 6-bisphosphatase
  • 3PO
  • PFK-158
  • PFK-15
  • autophagy
  • angiogenesis
  • cancer

1. Introduction

Glycolysis is an essential enzymatic process in human cell metabolism. It participates in the production of substrates that are required in multiple biochemical pathways, such as the tricarboxylic (TCA) acid cycle, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and fatty acids and cholesterol synthesis. In normal human cells (with the exception of red blood cells), anaerobic reactions predominate in the metabolism under reduced oxygen conditions. However, in 1927, Otto Warburg reported an essential role of glycolysis in cancer cells regardless of oxygen concentration in the tumor microenvironment [1,2,3]. This reprogramming of cancer cell metabolism is not only responsible for its aggressive growth but may also cause a beneficial decrease in Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation and key metabolites for cell growth [4]. It is worth noticing that a similar shift in metabolism is found in proliferative normal cells such as lymphocytes and endothelial cells in angiogenesis [5]. In recent years, targeting key regulatory steps of glycolysis has increasingly become an area of interest among scientists. There are many reports on novel inhibitors affecting distinct molecular targets in this process [6]. Amino acid sequence alterations leading to changes in enzyme catalytic activity have been detected in numerous proteins involved in glycolysis in different types of cancer [7].

Glycolysis is an essential enzymatic process in human cell metabolism. It participates in the production of substrates that are required in multiple biochemical pathways, such as the tricarboxylic (TCA) acid cycle, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and fatty acids and cholesterol synthesis. In normal human cells (with the exception of red blood cells), anaerobic reactions predominate in the metabolism under reduced oxygen conditions. However, in 1927, Otto Warburg reported an essential role of glycolysis in cancer cells regardless of oxygen concentration in the tumor microenvironment [1][2][3]. This reprogramming of cancer cell metabolism is not only responsible for its aggressive growth but may also cause a beneficial decrease in Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation and key metabolites for cell growth [4]. It is worth noticing that a similar shift in metabolism is found in proliferative normal cells such as lymphocytes and endothelial cells in angiogenesis [5]. In recent years, targeting key regulatory steps of glycolysis has increasingly become an area of interest among scientists. There are many reports on novel inhibitors affecting distinct molecular targets in this process [6]. Amino acid sequence alterations leading to changes in enzyme catalytic activity have been detected in numerous proteins involved in glycolysis in different types of cancer [7].

Glycolysis intensity is regulated by the activity of three physiologically irreversible enzymes: hexokinase, phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK-1), and pyruvate kinase. PFK-1 is the main rate-limiting enzyme of glycolysis and is responsible for the synthesis of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate from fructose-6-phosphate (F-6-P). Its activity is regulated by cytoplasmically localized metabolic products, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), F-6-P, and fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F-2,6-BP) (

Figure 1

) [8]. Of these compounds, F-2,6-BP, a product of the reaction catalyzed by 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFK-2/FBPase-2, PFKFB), is the most potent positive allosteric effector of PFK-1 [9]. PFK-2/FBPase-2 is a bifunctional enzyme responsible for the catalyzation of both the synthesis and degradation of F-2,6-BP mediated through its N-terminal domain (2-Kase) and C-terminal domain (2-Pase), respectively [10]. Of note, the active site of the 2-Kase domain has two distinct areas (the F-6-P binding loop and ATP-binding loop) essential for its function [4].

Cancers 13 00909 g001 550
Figure 1. The graphical presentation of PFK-1 regulation by PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 adapted from Yi et al. (2019) and Clem et al. (2008) [11,12]. Diverse arrows colors are used to express the differences between reactions enhancement: (green) normal, (yellow) moderately enhanced, (orange) strongly enhanced, (red) extremely enhanced. Abbreviations: PFK-1 - phosphofructokinase-1; PFKFB3: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isozyme 3; PFKFB4: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isozyme 4; ATP: adenosine triphosphate, ADP: adenosine diphosphate, DHAP: dihydroxyacetone phosphate; G3P: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate. Created with 

 The graphical presentation of PFK-1 regulation by PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 adapted from Yi et al. (2019) and Clem et al. (2008) [11][12]. Diverse arrows colors are used to express the differences between reactions enhancement: (green) normal, (yellow) moderately enhanced, (orange) strongly enhanced, (red) extremely enhanced. Abbreviations: PFK-1 - phosphofructokinase-1; PFKFB3: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isozyme 3; PFKFB4: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isozyme 4; ATP: adenosine triphosphate, ADP: adenosine diphosphate, DHAP: dihydroxyacetone phosphate; G3P: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate. Created with 

Https://Biorender.Com/

.

In humans, PFK-2/FBPase-2 is encoded by four different genes: PFKFB1, PFKFB2, PFKFB3, and PFKFB4 [13]. Thus far, four different PFK-2/FBPase-2 isozymes (PFKFB1, PFKFB2, PFKFB3, and PFKFB4) have been identified. Isozymes are characterized by tissue and functional specificity [14]. PFKFB1 can be found in the liver and skeletal muscle, PFKFB2 predominates in cardiac muscle, PFKFB3 is ubiquitously expressed, while PFKFB4 occurs mainly in testes [11]. The overexpression of two isozymes (PFKFB3 and PFKFB4) has been demonstrated in various solid tumors and hematological cancer cells [15,16,17].

In humans, PFK-2/FBPase-2 is encoded by four different genes: PFKFB1, PFKFB2, PFKFB3, and PFKFB4 [13]. Thus far, four different PFK-2/FBPase-2 isozymes (PFKFB1, PFKFB2, PFKFB3, and PFKFB4) have been identified. Isozymes are characterized by tissue and functional specificity [14]. PFKFB1 can be found in the liver and skeletal muscle, PFKFB2 predominates in cardiac muscle, PFKFB3 is ubiquitously expressed, while PFKFB4 occurs mainly in testes [11]. The overexpression of two isozymes (PFKFB3 and PFKFB4) has been demonstrated in various solid tumors and hematological cancer cells [15][16][17].

Furthermore, due to slight differences in amino acid sequences at key sites for enzymatic activity, all of the isozymes have a different affinity for the synthesis or degradation of F-2,6-BP. Their activity is expressed as the kinase/phosphatase ratio (also termed the 2-Kase/2-Pase activity ratio) [11]. This ratio is about 4.6/1 for PFKFB4 and 730/1 for PFKFB3, while it does not exceed 2.5/1 for PFKFB1 and PFKFB2. Isoforms commonly expressed in tumors satisfy increased energetic requirements of neoplastic cells more efficaciously. Thus, glycolysis, the hallmark of malignancy, might be vulnerable to the therapy affecting only isoforms characterized by a high kinase/phosphatase ratio [10,18].

Furthermore, due to slight differences in amino acid sequences at key sites for enzymatic activity, all of the isozymes have a different affinity for the synthesis or degradation of F-2,6-BP. Their activity is expressed as the kinase/phosphatase ratio (also termed the 2-Kase/2-Pase activity ratio) [11]. This ratio is about 4.6/1 for PFKFB4 and 730/1 for PFKFB3, while it does not exceed 2.5/1 for PFKFB1 and PFKFB2. Isoforms commonly expressed in tumors satisfy increased energetic requirements of neoplastic cells more efficaciously. Thus, glycolysis, the hallmark of malignancy, might be vulnerable to the therapy affecting only isoforms characterized by a high kinase/phosphatase ratio [10][18].

2. PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 in Cancer

PFK-2/FBPase-2 family members, PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 in particular, are overexpressed in numerous malignancies. PFKFB3 is frequently found in breast cancer [35,59,64,65], colon cancer [35], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [66], pancreatic cancer [67], gastric cancer [67], and many other neoplasms. Similarly, increased transcription of PFKFB4 is observed in pancreatic cancer [67], gastric cancer [67], ovarian cancer [68], breast cancer [35,69], colon cancer [35,70] and glioblastoma [71]. The significance of PFKFB3 level has been reported in cancer cells but also in tumor-related cells such as cancer stem cells. Furthermore, lower PFKFB3 and PFK-I expression levels have been demonstrated in induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells compared to cancer and cancer stem cells (CSCs). This distinct expression pattern of PFKFB3 may improve the timely detection of CSCs [64].

PFK-2/FBPase-2 family members, PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 in particular, are overexpressed in numerous malignancies. PFKFB3 is frequently found in breast cancer [19][20][21][22], colon cancer [19], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [23], pancreatic cancer [24], gastric cancer [24], and many other neoplasms. Similarly, increased transcription of PFKFB4 is observed in pancreatic cancer [24], gastric cancer [24], ovarian cancer [25], breast cancer [19][26], colon cancer [19][27] and glioblastoma [28]. The significance of PFKFB3 level has been reported in cancer cells but also in tumor-related cells such as cancer stem cells. Furthermore, lower PFKFB3 and PFK-I expression levels have been demonstrated in induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells compared to cancer and cancer stem cells (CSCs). This distinct expression pattern of PFKFB3 may improve the timely detection of CSCs [21].

Influence of PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 on Carcinogenesis

PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 affect carcinogenesis and cancer metabolism in a multidirectional manner. Both isozymes participate in the regulation of glucose metabolism through enhancing glycolysis and PPP. These enzymatic reactions are crucial for cancer development [11]. Increased glucose metabolism through glycolysis enables cancer cells to survive in a microenvironment with limited oxygen supply and produce lactate which acidifies the adherent tissues and thus accelerates metastatic development. On the other hand, redirection of glucose to PPP allows for the synthesis of lipids and nucleic acids essential for the growth of cancer cells. The expression of both enzymes is induced by hypoxia, thereby facilitating nonoxidative glucose-dependent energetic metabolism of the cell. PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 stimulate glucose uptake and boost glycolytic flux to cancer cells by increasing F-2,6-BP, which is a compound promoting glucose utilization by glycolysis [8]. Both proteins are directly engaged in the production of ATP and Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), the synthesis of nucleic acids, and thus cancer cell growth.

3. Targeting PFK-2 Isozymes in Malignancies

3.1. Outline of the Development of Inhibitors

Reports on the importance of PFKFB3 and PFKFB4 in cancer development and progression strongly suggest that these isozymes may represent promising targets for new potent personalized therapies in cancer treatment. This prompted research groups to investigate the efficacy of selective inhibitors.

In 1984, Sakakibara et al. identified a binding site of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase for Fru-6-P using N-bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate (BrAcNHEtOP) and 3-bromo-1,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 1,4-bisphosphate [142]. The inhibitory properties of these compounds were later confirmed in both in vitro and in vivo models. However, these inhibitors were not specific and therefore scientists continued to develop novel compounds [32,143]. The first-in-class small molecule PFKFB3 inhibitor, 3-(3-pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one, also known as 3PO was synthesized by Clem et al. in 2008 [12]. This compound was computationally identified by screening and docking using ChemNavigator software with a homologous model of the PFKFB3 isozyme, previously generated based on a PFKFB4 crystal structure from rat testes [4,144]. To date, 3PO has been the best-known inhibitor of PFKFB3, chemically belonging to the chalcone group. Its anticancer properties have been demonstrated in experimental models of several types of cancer, including breast cancer [145], ovarian cancer [52], melanoma [107], and bladder cancer [146]. The main factors limiting the potential use of 3PO in clinical trials include poor solubility and difficulty in obtaining sufficiently high concentrations to achieve potency [4]. In 2011, Akter et al. successfully attempted to use a nanocarrier to improve its efficacy in cancer treatment. They conjugated 3PO to micelles prepared from poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(aspartate) [PEG-p(ASP)], which resulted in achieving 2% wt. drug-loading in the nanocarrier polymer. Its favorable properties were observed in Jurkat, HeLa, and LLC cells [147]. In addition, it was shown that cancer cells became more sensitive to microtubule poisons, chemical compounds with the ability to bind to tubulin, thus preventing the formation of microtubules after 3PO treatment [11,105]. Since 3PO is not selective enough, more specific and selective novel PFKFB3 inhibitors were developed in the following years.

In 1984, Sakakibara et al. identified a binding site of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase for Fru-6-P using N-bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate (BrAcNHEtOP) and 3-bromo-1,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 1,4-bisphosphate [29]. The inhibitory properties of these compounds were later confirmed in both in vitro and in vivo models. However, these inhibitors were not specific and therefore scientists continued to develop novel compounds [30][31]. The first-in-class small molecule PFKFB3 inhibitor, 3-(3-pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one, also known as 3PO was synthesized by Clem et al. in 2008 [12]. This compound was computationally identified by screening and docking using ChemNavigator software with a homologous model of the PFKFB3 isozyme, previously generated based on a PFKFB4 crystal structure from rat testes [4][32]. To date, 3PO has been the best-known inhibitor of PFKFB3, chemically belonging to the chalcone group. Its anticancer properties have been demonstrated in experimental models of several types of cancer, including breast cancer [33], ovarian cancer [34], melanoma [35], and bladder cancer [36]. The main factors limiting the potential use of 3PO in clinical trials include poor solubility and difficulty in obtaining sufficiently high concentrations to achieve potency [4]. In 2011, Akter et al. successfully attempted to use a nanocarrier to improve its efficacy in cancer treatment. They conjugated 3PO to micelles prepared from poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(aspartate) [PEG-p(ASP)], which resulted in achieving 2% wt. drug-loading in the nanocarrier polymer. Its favorable properties were observed in Jurkat, HeLa, and LLC cells [37]. In addition, it was shown that cancer cells became more sensitive to microtubule poisons, chemical compounds with the ability to bind to tubulin, thus preventing the formation of microtubules after 3PO treatment [11][38]. Since 3PO is not selective enough, more specific and selective novel PFKFB3 inhibitors were developed in the following years.

In 2011, Seo et al. determined the crystal structure of PFKFB3 and identified new inhibitors such as N4A and YN1. This study not only revealed two inhibitors with increased selectivity for PFKFB3, but was also essential for future targeted drug design due to the extension of knowledge regarding PFKFB3 structure [148].

In 2011, Seo et al. determined the crystal structure of PFKFB3 and identified new inhibitors such as N4A and YN1. This study not only revealed two inhibitors with increased selectivity for PFKFB3, but was also essential for future targeted drug design due to the extension of knowledge regarding PFKFB3 structure [39].

PFK15, a derivative of 3PO, was another chalcone compound developed to inhibit PFKFB3. The first report of screening, selection, and its impact on cancer cells was published by Clem et al. in 2013 [83]. An increase in binding potency of PFK15 was later achieved by the substitution of the pyridinyl ring with a quinoline ring in 3PO (

PFK15, a derivative of 3PO, was another chalcone compound developed to inhibit PFKFB3. The first report of screening, selection, and its impact on cancer cells was published by Clem et al. in 2013 [40]. An increase in binding potency of PFK15 was later achieved by the substitution of the pyridinyl ring with a quinoline ring in 3PO (

Figure 9) [4]. This structural modification resulted in an increased selectivity and inhibitory effectiveness (~100-fold), which led to an enhancement of proapoptotic activity compared to 3PO [83]. Due to its modification, PFK15 shows better pharmacokinetic properties, e.g., reduced clearance, higher T1/2, and longer microsomal stability [83]. It was also reported that PFK15 did not inhibit other glycolysis-related enzymes such as phosphoglucose isomerase, PFK-1, PFKFB4, or hexokinase [83].

) [4]. This structural modification resulted in an increased selectivity and inhibitory effectiveness (~100-fold), which led to an enhancement of proapoptotic activity compared to 3PO [40]. Due to its modification, PFK15 shows better pharmacokinetic properties, e.g., reduced clearance, higher T1/2, and longer microsomal stability [40]. It was also reported that PFK15 did not inhibit other glycolysis-related enzymes such as phosphoglucose isomerase, PFK-1, PFKFB4, or hexokinase [40].

PFK158, another novel PFKFB3 inhibitor, was proven effective in gynecological cancers [82] and mesothelioma [149]. Moreover, this compound was enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced solid malignancies [150]. Clinical trials assessing the safety of PFK158 (NCT02044861) were initiated in 2014 and no serious adverse events were reported during the ~one-year follow-up [10]. Once the maximum tolerated dose has been established, Phase II trials of this optimized PFKFB3 inhibitor will also be introduced in leukemia therapy [83].

PFK158, another novel PFKFB3 inhibitor, was proven effective in gynecological cancers [41] and mesothelioma [42]. Moreover, this compound was enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced solid malignancies [43]. Clinical trials assessing the safety of PFK158 (NCT02044861) were initiated in 2014 and no serious adverse events were reported during the ~one-year follow-up [10]. Once the maximum tolerated dose has been established, Phase II trials of this optimized PFKFB3 inhibitor will also be introduced in leukemia therapy [40].

Since 2014, three novel inhibitors have been developed: compound 26 [151] and PQP [152] and KAN0438757 [153]. The anticancer efficacy was only proven in vitro. KAN0438757 is the most recently (2019) developed PFKFB3 inhibitor and may induce nucleotide incorporation during DNA repair and selectively sensitize transformed cells to the impact of radiation [153].

Since 2014, three novel inhibitors have been developed: compound 26 [44] and PQP [45] and KAN0438757 [46]. The anticancer efficacy was only proven in vitro. KAN0438757 is the most recently (2019) developed PFKFB3 inhibitor and may induce nucleotide incorporation during DNA repair and selectively sensitize transformed cells to the impact of radiation [46].

The recent progress in identifying new drugs targeting PFK-2 isozymes is dominated by compounds inhibiting PFKFB3. This is probably due to a better understanding of this isozyme and its role in cancer cell biology. To date, there has only been one study focusing on PFKFB4 inhibitor design, which reported an anti-proliferative effect of 5-(n-(8-methoxy-4-quinolyl)amino)pentyl nitrate (5MPN) on H460 adenocarcinoma cells. Clearly, these results were promising and justify further investigation of the effects of specific PFKFB4 inhibitors.

The compounds described in this section have a diverse impact on cancer cell metabolism, which is the result of differences in their structures that determine the activity of each compound (IC50 or Ki) and translate into pharmacokinetic properties such as bioavailability and water solubility (

Figure 2

).

Cancers 13 00909 g010 550
Figure 2.

 Structural models (on the left), 3D models (in the middle) and IC50 or Ki values of the most important PFKFB3 (

A

–

D

) and PFKFB4 (

E

) inhibitors to date. The models were obtained from PubChem: (

A)—N-Bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate [154], (

)—N-Bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate [47], (

B)—3-(3-pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one (3PO) [155], (

)—3-(3-pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one (3PO) [48], (

C)—PFK15 [156], (

)—PFK15 [49], (

D)—PFK158 [157], (

)—PFK158 [50], (

E)—5MPN [158]. The circles illustrate the differences in the chemical (green circles) and 3D structure (orange circles) between the 3PO (

)—5MPN [51]. The circles illustrate the differences in the chemical (green circles) and 3D structure (orange circles) between the 3PO (

B

), PFK15 (

C

), and PFKF158 (

D)–consecutive derivatives chalcone compounds. IC50 and Ki values were obtained from Wang et al. (2020) [4] and Chesney et al. (2015) [159].

)–consecutive derivatives chalcone compounds. IC50 and Ki values were obtained from Wang et al. (2020) [4] and Chesney et al. (2015) [52].

3.2. Chemosensitivity, Chemoresistance, and Potential Combined Therapies for Malignancies

Current chemotherapeutic and irradiation protocols target rapidly dividing cells. Targeting glycolysis, a process that is regulated by PFKFB and is crucial for ATP generation in proliferating cancer cells seems to be a promising therapeutic approach with anticancer properties. Combining currently used chemotherapeutics (conventional or tumor pathway-specific agents) with PFKFB3 or PFKFB4 inhibitors is expected to enrich the range of treatment options. Despite the exponential development of new drugs, the occurrence of resistance simultaneously increases as well; this emphasizes the importance of implementing drug combinations or adding novel therapeutic agents in an attempt to overcome this hurdle [160]. PFKFB inhibition might prevent disease progression and drug resistance, and even improve progression-free survival (PFS) and/or response rates [10,32]. Another argument in favor of combination therapy with these inhibitors is the association between drug resistance, mitochondrial respiratory defects, and increased glycolysis in cancer cells [11,32,161]. Multiple trials verifying currently approved agents, such as inhibitors of angiogenesis or autophagy, and substances interfering with the electron transport chain or glutamine metabolism, in combination with PFKFB inhibitors are expected to be initiated in cohorts with distinct types of cancers [83]. Liu et al. (2001) suggested that the inhibition of glycolysis markedly sensitizes slow-growing cancers to chemotherapy and irradiation [162].

Current chemotherapeutic and irradiation protocols target rapidly dividing cells. Targeting glycolysis, a process that is regulated by PFKFB and is crucial for ATP generation in proliferating cancer cells seems to be a promising therapeutic approach with anticancer properties. Combining currently used chemotherapeutics (conventional or tumor pathway-specific agents) with PFKFB3 or PFKFB4 inhibitors is expected to enrich the range of treatment options. Despite the exponential development of new drugs, the occurrence of resistance simultaneously increases as well; this emphasizes the importance of implementing drug combinations or adding novel therapeutic agents in an attempt to overcome this hurdle [53]. PFKFB inhibition might prevent disease progression and drug resistance, and even improve progression-free survival (PFS) and/or response rates [10][30]. Another argument in favor of combination therapy with these inhibitors is the association between drug resistance, mitochondrial respiratory defects, and increased glycolysis in cancer cells [11][30][54]. Multiple trials verifying currently approved agents, such as inhibitors of angiogenesis or autophagy, and substances interfering with the electron transport chain or glutamine metabolism, in combination with PFKFB inhibitors are expected to be initiated in cohorts with distinct types of cancers [40]. Liu et al. (2001) suggested that the inhibition of glycolysis markedly sensitizes slow-growing cancers to chemotherapy and irradiation [55].

References

  1. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956, 123, 309–314.
  2. Warburg, O.; Wind, F.; Negelein, E. THE METABOLISM OF TUMORS IN THE BODY. J. Gen. Physiol. 1927, 8, 519–530.
  3. Koppenol, W.H.; Bounds, P.L.; Dang, C.V. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 325–337.
  4. Wang, Y.; Qu, C.; Liu, T.; Wang, C. PFKFB3 inhibitors as potential anticancer agents: Mechanisms of action, current developments, and structure-activity relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 203, 112612.
  5. Kishton, R.J.; Rathmell, J.C. Novel therapeutic targets of tumor metabolism. Cancer J. 2015, 21, 62–69.
  6. Fortunato, S.; Bononi, G.; Granchi, C.; Minutolo, F. An Update on Patents Covering Agents That Interfere with the Cancer Glycolytic Cascade. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 2251–2265.
  7. Morris, A. Inhibiting glycolysis in tumour cells. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 323.
  8. Bartrons, R.; Simon-Molas, H.; Rodríguez-García, A.; Castaño, E.; Navarro-Sabaté, À.; Manzano, A.; Martinez-Outschoorn, U.E. Fructose 2,6-bisphosphate in cancer cell metabolism. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 331.
  9. Houddane, A.; Bultot, L.; Novellasdemunt, L.; Johanns, M.; Gueuning, M.A.; Vertommen, D.; Coulie, P.G.; Bartrons, R.; Hue, L.; Rider, M.H. Role of Akt/PKB and PFKFB isoenzymes in the control of glycolysis, cell proliferation and protein synthesis in mitogen-stimulated thymocytes. Cell. Signal. 2017, 34, 23–37.
  10. Lu, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Y. The molecular basis of targeting PFKFB3 as a therapeutic strategy against cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 62793–62802.
  11. Yi, M.; Ban, Y.; Tan, Y.; Xiong, W.; Li, G.; Xiang, B. 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 and 4: A pair of valves for fine-tuning of glucose metabolism in human cancer. Mol. Metab. 2019, 20, 1–13.
  12. Clem, B.; Telang, S.; Clem, A.; Yalcin, A.; Meier, J.; Simmons, A.; Rasku, M.A.; Arumugam, S.; Dean, W.L.; Eaton, J.; et al. Small-molecule inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activity suppresses glycolytic flux and tumor growth. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 110–120.
  13. Ros, S.; Schulze, A. Balancing glycolytic flux: The role of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose 2,6-bisphosphatases in cancer metabolism. Cancer Metab. 2013, 1, 8.
  14. Shi, L.; Pan, H.; Liu, Z.; Xie, J.; Han, W. Roles of PFKFB3 in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17044.
  15. Zhu, Y.; Lu, L.; Qiao, C.; Shan, Y.; Li, H.; Qian, S.; Hong, M.; Zhao, H.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.; et al. Targeting PFKFB3 sensitizes chronic myelogenous leukemia cells to tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Oncogene 2018, 37, 2837–2849.
  16. Chesney, J. 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase and tumor cell glycolysis. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2006, 9, 535–539.
  17. Gómez, M.; Manzano, A.; Navarro-Sabaté, À.; Duran, J.; Obach, M.; Perales, J.C.; Bartrons, R. Specific expression of pfkfb4 gene in spermatogonia germ cells and analysis of its 5′-flanking region. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 357–362.
  18. Pavlova, N.N.; Thompson, C.B. The Emerging Hallmarks of Cancer Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 27–47.
  19. Minchenko, O.H.; Ochiai, A.; Opentanova, I.L.; Ogura, T.; Minchenko, D.O.; Caro, J.; Komisarenko, S.V.; Esumi, H. Overexpression of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase-4 in the human breast and colon malignant tumors. Biochimie 2005, 87, 1005–1010.
  20. O’Neal, J.; Clem, A.; Reynolds, L.; Dougherty, S.; Imbert-Fernandez, Y.; Telang, S.; Chesney, J.; Clem, B.F. Inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) suppresses glucose metabolism and the growth of HER2+ breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 160, 29–40.
  21. Cieslar-Pobuda, A.; Jain, M.V.; Kratz, G.; Rzeszowska-Wolny, J.; Ghavami, S.; Wiechec, E. The expression pattern of PFKFB3 enzyme distinguishes between induced-pluripotent stem cells and cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 29753–29770.
  22. Peng, F.; Li, Q.; Sun, J.Y.; Luo, Y.; Chen, M.; Bao, Y. PFKFB3 is involved in breast cancer proliferation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 945–954.
  23. Gu, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Han, L.; Tang, M.; You, B.; Zhang, Q.; et al. PFKFB3 promotes proliferation, migration and angiogenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Cancer 2017, 8, 3887–3896.
  24. Minchenko, O.H.; Tsuchihara, K.; Minchenko, D.O.; Bikfalvi, A.; Esumi, H. Mechanisms of regulation of PFKFB expression in pancreatic and gastric cancer cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 13705–13717.
  25. Taylor, C.; Mannion, D.; Miranda, F.; Karaminejadranjbar, M.; Herrero-Gonzalez, S.; Hellner, K.; Zheng, Y.; Bartholomeusz, G.; Bast, R.C.; Ahmed, A.A. Loss of PFKFB4 induces cell death in mitotically arrested ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 17960–17980.
  26. Gao, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Xun, J.; Zhou, W.; Wang, P.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Shen, W.; Su, W.; et al. PFKFB4 Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis via Induction of Hyaluronan Production in a p38-Dependent Manner. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 2108–2123.
  27. Yan, S.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, K.; Zheng, W.; Bao, Y.; Yang, W. PFKFB3 inhibition attenuates oxaliplatin-induced autophagy and enhances its cytotoxicity in colon cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5415.
  28. Libby, C.J.; Tran, A.N.; Scott, S.E.; Griguer, C.; Hjelmeland, A.B. The pro-tumorigenic effects of metabolic alterations in glioblastoma including brain tumor initiating cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2018, 1869, 175–188.
  29. Sakakibara, R.; Kitajima, S.; Hartman, F.C.; Uyedag, K. Hexose Phosphate Binding Sites of Fructose-6-phosphate,2-kinase:Fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3-bromo-1,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 1,4-bisphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 14023–14028.
  30. Bartrons, R.; Rodríguez-García, A.; Simon-Molas, H.; Castaño, E.; Manzano, A.; Navarro-Sabaté, À. The potential utility of PFKFB3 as a therapeutic target. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2018, 1–16.
  31. Harada, Y.; Tominaga, N.; Watanabe, M.; Shimokawa, R.; Ishiguro, M.; Sakakibara, R. Inhibition of fructose-6-phosphate,2-kinase by N-bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate in vitro and in vivo. J. Biochem. 1997, 121, 724–730.
  32. Yuen, M.H.; Wang, X.L.; Mizuguchi, H.; Uyeda, K.; Hasemann, C.A. A Switch in the Kinase Domain of Rat Testis 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/Fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 12333–12342.
  33. Pisarsky, L.; Bill, R.; Fagiani, E.; Dimeloe, S.; Goosen, R.W.; Hagmann, J.; Hess, C.; Christofori, G. Targeting Metabolic Symbiosis to Overcome Resistance to Anti-angiogenic Therapy. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 1161–1174.
  34. Xintaropoulou, C.; Ward, C.; Wise, A.; Marston, H.; Turnbull, A.; Langdon, S.P. A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 25677–25695.
  35. Kotowski, K.; Supplitt, S.; Wiczew, D.; Bartosik, W.; Saczko, J.; Rossowska, J.; Drąg-Zalesińska, M.; Michel, O.; Kulbacka, J. 3PO as a Selective Inhibitor of 6-Phosphofructo-2-Kinase/Fructose-2,6-Biphosphatase 3 in A375 Human Melanoma Cells. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40, 2613–2625.
  36. Lea, M.A.; Altayyar, M.; desBordes, C. Inhibition of Growth of Bladder Cancer Cells by 3-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one in Combination with Other Compounds Affecting Glucose Metabolism. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 5889–5899.
  37. Akter, S.; Clem, B.F.; Lee, H.J.; Chesney, J.; Bae, Y. Block copolymer micelles for controlled delivery of glycolytic enzyme inhibitors. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 847–855.
  38. Doménech, E.; Maestre, C.; Esteban-Martínez, L.; Partida, D.; Pascual, R.; Fernández-Miranda, G.; Seco, E.; Campos-Olivas, R.; Pérez, M.; Megias, D.; et al. AMPK and PFKFB3 mediate glycolysis and survival in response to mitophagy during mitotic arrest. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 1304–1316.
  39. Seo, M.; Kim, J.D.; Neau, D.; Sehgal, I.; Lee, Y.H. Structure-based development of small molecule PFKFB3 inhibitors: A framework for potential cancer therapeutic agents targeting the Warburg effect. PLoS ONE 2011, 6.
  40. Clem, B.F.; O’Neal, J.; Tapolsky, G.; Clem, A.L.; Imbert-Fernandez, Y.; Kerr, D.A.; Klarer, A.C.; Redman, R.; Miller, D.M.; Trent, J.O.; et al. Targeting 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) as a therapeutic strategy against cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 1461–1470.
  41. Mondal, S.; Roy, D.; Sarkar Bhattacharya, S.; Jin, L.; Jung, D.; Zhang, S.; Kalogera, E.; Staub, J.; Wang, Y.; Xuyang, W.; et al. Therapeutic targeting of PFKFB3 with a novel glycolytic inhibitor PFK158 promotes lipophagy and chemosensitivity in gynecologic cancers. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 178–189.
  42. Sarkar Bhattacharya, S.; Thirusangu, P.; Jin, L.; Roy, D.; Jung, D.; Xiao, Y.; Staub, J.; Roy, B.; Molina, J.R.; Shridhar, V. PFKFB3 inhibition reprograms malignant pleural mesothelioma to nutrient stress-induced macropinocytosis and ER stress as independent binary adaptive responses. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10.
  43. Phase 1 Safety Study of ACT-PFK-158, 2HCl in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: (accessed on 12 April 2020).
  44. Boyd, S.; Brookfield, J.L.; Critchlow, S.E.; Cumming, I.A.; Curtis, N.J.; Debreczeni, J.; Degorce, S.L.; Donald, C.; Evans, N.J.; Groombridge, S.; et al. Structure-Based Design of Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the Metabolic Kinase PFKFB3. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 3611–3625.
  45. Lea, M.A.; Guzman, Y.; Desbordes, C. Inhibition of growth by combined treatment with inhibitors of lactate dehydrogenase and either phenformin or inhibitors of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 1479–1488.
  46. Gustafsson, N.M.S.; Färnegårdh, K.; Bonagas, N.; Ninou, A.H.; Groth, P.; Wiita, E.; Jönsson, M.; Hallberg, K.; Lehto, J.; Pennisi, R.; et al. Targeting PFKFB3 radiosensitizes cancer cells and suppresses homologous recombination. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–16.
  47. N-Bromoacetylethanolamine phosphate |C4H9BrNO5P—PubChem. Available online: (accessed on 10 May 2020).
  48. 3-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one |C13H10N2O—PubChem. Available online: (accessed on 11 May 2020).
  49. 1-(Pyridin-4-yl)-3-(quinolin-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one |C17H12N2O—PubChem. Available online: (accessed on 11 May 2020).
  50. CID 71730058 | C18H11F3N2O-PubChem. Available online: (accessed on 11 May 2020).
  51. 5-[(8-Methoxyquinolin-4-yl)amino]pentyl nitrate | C15H19N3O4—PubChem. Available online: (accessed on 11 May 2020).
  52. Chesney, J.; Clark, J.; Lanceta, L.; Trent, J.O.; Telang, S. Targeting the sugar metabolism of tumors with a first-in-class 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB4) inhibitor. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 18001–18011.
  53. Kotowski, K.; Supplitt, S.; Saczko, J.; Kulbacka, J. Molecular determinants of resistance to treatment with BRAF inhibitors and innovative possibilities of its overcoming. Postępy Biol. Komórki 2019, 46, 147–158.
  54. Xu, R.H.; Pelicano, H.; Zhou, Y.; Carew, J.S.; Feng, L.; Bhalla, K.N.; Keating, M.J.; Huang, P. Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: A novel strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and hypoxia. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 613–621.
  55. Liu, H.; Hu, Y.P.; Savaraj, N.; Priebe, W.; Lampidis, T.J. Hypersensitization of tumor cells to glycolytic inhibitors. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 5542–5547.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback