References

1. McKinney, M.L. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. BioScience 2002, 52, 883–890.
2. Kowarik, I. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ. Pollut 2011, 159, 1974–1983.
3. UNDESA. 2018 The Sustainable Development Goals Report; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/the-sustainable-development-goals-report-2018.html (accessed on: 20 June 2020).
4. Lepczyk, C.A.; Aronson, M.F.; Evans, K.L.; Goddard, M.A.; Lerman, S.B.; MacIvor, J.S. Biodiversity in the city: Fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience 2017, 67, 799–807.
5. Sol, D.; Duncan, R.P.; Blackburn, T.M.; Cassey, P.; Lefebvre, L. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 5460–5465.
6. Liu, Z.; He, C.; Wu, J. The relationship between habitat loss and fragmentation during urbanization: An empirical evalua-tion from 16 world cities. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154613.
7. Belaire, J.A.; Westphal, L.M.; Whelan, C.J.; Minor, E.S. Urban residents’ perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: Biodiver-sity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor 2015, 117, 192–202.
8. Aronson, M.F.; La Sorte, F.A.; Nilon, C.H.; Katti, M.; Goddard, M.A.; Lepczyk, C.A.; Warren, P.S.; Williams, N.S.; Cilliers, S.; Clarkson, B.; et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20133330.
9. Hensley, C.B.; Trisos, C.H.; Warren, P.S.; MacFarland, J.; Blumenshine, S.; Reece, J.; Katti, M. Effects of urbanization on na-tive bird species in three southwestern US Cities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 71.
10. Whelan, C.J.; Wenny, D.G.; Marquis, R.J. Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1134, 25–60.
11. Sandström, U.G.; Angelstam, P.; Mikusiński, G. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc. Urban Plan 2006, 77, 39–53.
12. Goodness, J.; Andersson, E.; Anderson, P.M.; Elmqvist, T. Exploring the links between functional traits and cultural ecosys-tem services to enhance urban ecosystem management. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 70, 597–605.
13. Heyman, E.; Gunnarsson, B.; Dovydavicius, L. Management of urban nature and its impact on bird ecosystem services. In Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments; Murgui, E., Hedblom, M., Eds.; Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 465–488.
14. Gil, D.; Brumm, H. Avian Urban Ecology, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. xiii–xv.
15. Kumar, N.; Gupta, U.; Malhotra, H.; Jhala, Y.V.; Qureshi, Q.; Gosler, A.G.; Sergio, F. The population density of an urban raptor is inextricably tied to human cultural practices. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 286, 20182932.
16. Chace, J.F.; Walsh, J.J. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan 2006, 74, 46–69.
17. Palacio, F.X. Urban exploiters have broader dietary niches than urban avoiders. Ibis 2019, 162, 42–49.
18. Leveau, L.M. Bird traits in urban–rural gradients: How many functional groups are there? J. Ornithol. 2013, 154, 655–662.
19. Lizée, M.H.; Mauffrey, J.F.; Tatoni, T.; Deschamps-Cottin, M. Monitoring urban environments on the basis of biological traits. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 353–361.
20. Shochat, E.; Lerman, S.; Fernández-Juricic, E. Birds in urban ecosystems: Population dynamics, community structure, biodi-versity, and conservation. In Urban Ecosystem Ecology, 1st ed.; Aitkenhead-Peterson, J.A., Volder, A., Eds.; American Agron-omy Society: Madison, WI, USA, 2010; pp. 75–86.
21. Sol, D.; González-Lagos, C.; Moreira, D.; Maspons, J.; Lapiedra, O. Urbanization tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. Ecol. Lett. 2014, 17, 942–950.
22. Blumstein, D.T. Attention, habituation, and antipredator behavior: Implications for urban birds. In Avian Urban Ecology; Di-ego, G., Henrik, B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 41–53.
23. Bonier, F. Hormones in the city: Endocrine ecology of urban birds. Horm. Behav. 2012, 61, 763–772.
24. Rayner, L.; Ikin, K.; Evans, M.J.; Gibbons, P.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Manning, A.D. Avifauna and urban encroachment in time and space. Divers. Distrib. 2015, 21, 428–440.
25. Leveau, L.M.; Leveau, C.M.; Villegas, M.; Cursach, J.A.; Suazo, C.G. Bird communities along urbanization gradients: A comparative analysis among three neo-tropical cities. Ornitol. Neotrop. 2017, 28, 77–87.
26. La Sorte, F.A.; Lepczyk, C.A.; Aronson, M.F.J.; Goddard, M.A.; Hedblom, M.; Katti, M.; MacGregor-Fors, I. The phylogenetic and functional diversity of regional breeding bird assemblages is reduced and constricted through urbanization. Divers. Distrib. 2018, 24, 928–938.
27. Saari, S.; Richter, S.; Higgins, M.; Oberhofer, M.; Jennings, A.; Faeth, S.H. Urbanization is not associated with increased abundance or decreased richness of terrestrial animals-dissecting the literature through meta-analysis. Urban Ecosyst. 2016, 19, 1251–1264.
28. Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Rubio, E.; Benedetti, Y.; Morelli, F. Global loss of avian evolutionary uniqueness in urban areas. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 2990–2998.
29. Batáry, P.; Kurucz, K.; Suarez-Rubio, M.; Chamberlain, D.E. Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 1046–1054.
30. Morelli, F.; Benedetti, Y.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Jokimäki, J.; Mänd, R.; Tryjanowski, P.; Møller, A.P. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016, 25, 1284–1293.
31. Hagen, O.E.; Hagen, O.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Petchey, O.L.; Evans, K.L. Impacts of urban areas and their characteristics on avian functional diversity. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 84.
32. Shochat, E.; Warren, P.S.; Faeth, S.H.; McIntyre, N.E.; Hope, D. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21, 186–191.
33. MacGregor-Fors, I.; Morales-Pérez, L.; Schondube, J.E. Migrating to the city: Responses of neo-tropical migrant bird com-munities to urbanization. Condor 2010, 112, 711–717.
34. Leveau, L.M. Urbanization, environmental stabilization and temporal persistence of bird species: A view from Latin Amer-ica. PeerJ 2018, 6, e6056.
35. Faeth, S.H.; Bang, C.; Saari, S. Urban biodiversity: Patterns and mechanisms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1223, 69–81.
36. Paton, G.D.; Shoffner, A.V.; Wilson, A.M.; Gagne, S.A. The traits that predict the magnitude and spatial scale of forest bird responses to urbanization intensity. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220120.
37. Julliard, R.; Jiguet, F.; Couvet, D. Common birds facing global changes: What makes a species at risk? Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 148–154.
38. Callaghan, C.T.; Major, R.E.; Wilshire, J.H.; Martin, J.M.; Kingsford, R.T.; Cornwell, W.K. Generalists are the most ur-ban-tolerant of birds: A phylogenetically controlled analysis of ecological and life history traits using a novel continuous measure of bird responses to urbanization. Oikos 2019, 128, 845–858.
39. Callaghan, C.T.; Benedetti, Y.; Wilshire, J.H.; Morelli, F. Avian trait specialization is negatively associated with urban tol-erance. Oikos 2020, 129, 1541–1551.
40. Devictor, V.; Julliard, R.; Couvet, D.; Lee, A.; Jiguet, F. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communi-ties. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21, 41–751.
41. Futuyama, D.J.; Moreno, G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 1988, 19, 207–233.
42. Kark, S.; Iwaniuk, A.; Schalimtzek, A.; Banker, E. Living in the city: Can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter? J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34, 638–651.
43. Evans, K.L.; Chamberlain, D.E.; Hatchwell, B.J.; Gregory, R.D.; Gaston, K.J. What makes an urban bird? Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 1365–2486.
44. Morelli, F.; Benedetti, Y.; Su, T.; Zhou, B.; Moravec, D.; Šímová, P.; Liang, W. Taxonomic diversity, functional diversity and evolutionary uniqueness in bird communities of Beijing’s urban parks: Effects of land use and vegetation structure. Urban Urban Green. 2017, 23, 84–92.
45. Gutiérrez-Tapia, P.; Azócar, M.I.; Castro, S.A. A citizen-based platform reveals the distribution of functional groups inside a large city from the Southern Hemisphere: E-Bird and the urban birds of Santiago (Central Chile). Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2018, 91, 3.
46. Lim, H.C.; Sodhi, N.S. Responses of avian guilds to urbanization in a tropical city. Landsc. Urban Plan 2004, 66, 199–215.
47. Boal, C.W. Urban raptor communities: Why some raptors and not others occupy urban environments. In Urban Raptors; Boal, C.W., Dykstra, C.R., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 36–50.
48. Rullman, S.; Marzluff, J.M. Raptor presence along an urban–wildland gradient: Influences of prey abundance and land cov-er. J. Raptor Res. 2014, 48, 257–272.
49. Thomson, V.K.; Stevens, T.; Jones, D.; Huijbers, C. Carrion preference in Australian coastal raptors: Effects of Urbanisation on scavenging. Sunbird 2016, 46, 16.
50. Hindmarch, S.; Elliott, J.E. A specialist in the city: The diet of barn owls along a rural to urban gradient. Urban Ecosyst. 2015, 18, 477–488.
51. Jones, D.N.; Reynolds, J.S. Feeding birds in our towns and cities: A global research opportunity. J. Avian Biol. 2008, 39, 265–271.
52. Hodgson, P.; French, K.; Major, R.E. Comparison of foraging behavior of small, urban-sensitive insectivores in continuous woodland and woodland remnants in a suburban landscape. Wildl. Res. 2006, 33, 591–603.
53. Hodgson, P.; French, K.; Major, R.E. Comparison of foraging behavior of small, urban-sensitive insectivores in continuous woodland and woodland remnants in a suburban landscape. Wildl. Res. 2006, 33, 591–603.
54. Ikin, K.; Knight, E.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Fischer, J.; Manning, A.D. Linking bird species traits to vegetation characteristics in a future urban development zone: Implications for urban planning. Urban Ecosyst. 2012, 15, 961–977.
55. Croci, S.; Butet, A.; Clergeau, P. Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits. Condor 2008, 110, 223–240.
56. Reale, J.A.; Blair, R.B. Nesting success and life-history attributes of bird communities along an urbanization gradient. Urban Habitats 2005, 3, 1–24.
57. Máthé, O.; Batáry, P. Insectivorous and open-cup nester bird species suffer the most from urbanization. Bird Study 2015, 62, 78–86.
58. Dykstra, C.R. City Lifestyles: Behavioral Ecology of Urban Raptors. In Urban Raptors; Boal, C.W., Dykstra, C.R., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 18–35.
59. Gahbauer, M.A.; Bird, D.M.; Clark, K.E.; French, T.; Brauning, D.W.; Mcmorris, F.A. Productivity, mortality, and manage-ment of urban peregrine falcons in northeastern North America. J. Wildl. Manag. 2015, 79, 10–19.
60. Mason, C.F. Avian species richness and numbers in the built environment: Can new housing developments be good for birds? In Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation; Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Neth-erlands, 2006; pp. 2365–2378.
61. Thornton, M.; Todd, I.; Roos, S. Breeding success and productivity of urban and rural Eurasian Sparrowhawks Accipiter ni-sus in Scotland. Écoscience 2017, 24, 115–126.
62. Partecke, J.; Van’t Hof, T.; Gwinner, E. Differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest European black-birds (Turdus merula): Result of phenotypic flexibility or genetic differences? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271, 1995–2001.
63. Atwell, J.W.; Cardoso, G.; Whittaker, D.J.; Price, T.D.; Ketterson, E.D. Hormonal, behavioral, and life-history traits exhibit correlated shifts in relation to population establishment in a novel environment. Am. Nat. 2014, 184, E147–E160.
64. Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Differences in the reproductive hormone rhythm of Tree sparrows (Passer montanus) from urban and rural sites in Beijing: The effect of anthropogenic light sources. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 206, 24–29.
65. Davies, S.; Behbahaninia, H.; Giraudeau, M.; Meddle, S.L.; Waites, K.; Deviche, P. Advanced seasonal reproductive devel-opment in a male urban bird is reflected in earlier plasma luteinizing hormone rise but not energetic status. Gen. Comp. En-docrinol. 2015, 224, 1–10.
66. Kettel, E.F.; Gentle, L.K.; Quinn, J.L.; Yarnell, R.W. The breeding performance of raptors in urban landscapes: A review and meta-analysis. J. Ornithol. 2018, 159, 1–18.
67. Chamberlain, D.E.; Cannon, A.R.; Toms, M.P.; Leech, D.I.; Hatchwell, B.J.; Gaston, K.J. Avian productivity in urban land-scapes: A review and meta-analysis. Ibis 2009, 151, 1–18.
68. Marini, K.L.D.; Otter, K.A.; LaZerte, S.E.; Reudink, M.W. Urban environments are associated with earlier clutches and faster nestling feather growth compared to natural habitats. Urban Ecosyst. 2017, 20, 1291–1300.
69. Antonov, A.; Atanasova, D. Small-scale differences in the breeding ecology of urban and rural magpies (Pica pica). Ornis Fennica 2003, 80, 21–30.
70. Shochat, E.; Lerman, S.B.; Katti, M.; Lewis, D.B. Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an ur-ban-desert landscape: Field experiments with artificial food patches. ‎Am. Nat. 2004, 164, 232–243.
71. Caizergues, A.E.; Grégoire, A.; Charmantier, A. Urban versus forest ecotypes are not explained by divergent reproductive selection. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20180261.
72. Mennechez, G.; Clergeau, P. Effect of urbanization on habitat generalists: Starlings not so flexible? Acta Oecol. 2006, 30, 182–191.
73. Liker, A.; Papp, Z.; Bókony, V.; Lendvai, A.Z. Lean birds in the city: Body size and condition of house sparrows along the urbanization gradient. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77, 789–795.
74. Auman, H.J.; Meathrel, C.E.; Richardson, A. Supersize me: Does anthropogenic food change the body condition of Silver Gulls? A comparison between urbanized and remote, non-urbanized areas. Waterbirds 2008, 31, 122–126.
75. Bókony, V.; Seress, G.; Nagy, S.; Lendvai, A.Z.; Liker, A. Multiple indices of body condition reveal no negative effect of ur-banization in adult house sparrows. Landsc. Urban Plan 2012, 104, 75–84.
76. Leveau, L.M. Urbanization induces bird color homogenization. Landsc. Urban Plan 2019, 192, 103645.
77. Sol, D.; Bacher, S.; Reader, S.M.; Lefebvre, L. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel envi-ronments. Am. Nat. 2008, 172, 63–71.
78. Maklakov, A.A.; Immler, S.; Gonzalez-Voyer, A.; Rönn, J.; Kolm, N. Brains and the city: Big-brained passerine birds succeed in urban environments. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7, 730–732.
79. Carrete, M.; Tella, J.L. Inter-individual variability in fear of humans and relative brain size of the species are related to con-temporary urban invasion in birds. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18859.
80. Møller, A.P. Behavioural and ecological predictors of urbanization. In Avian Urban Ecology; Gil, D., Brumm, H., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 54–68.
81. Møller, A.P.; Erritzøe, J. Brain size and urbanization in birds. Avian Res. 2015, 6, 8.
82. Grunst, M.L.; Rotenberry, J.T.; Grunst, A.S. Variation in adrenocortical stress physiology and condition metrics within a heterogeneous urban environment in the Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). J. Avian Biol. 2014, 45, 574–583.
83. Davies, S.; Haddad, N.; Ouyang, J.Q. Stressful city sounds: Glucocorticoid responses to experimental traffic noise are envi-ronmentally dependent. Biol. Lett. 2017, 13, 20170276.
84. Russ, A.; Reitemeier, S.; Weissmann, A.; Gottschalk, J.; Einspanier, A.; Klenke, R. Seasonal and urban effects on the endocri-nology of a wild passerine. Ecol. Evol. 2015, 5, 5698–5710.
85. Dominoni, D.M. The effects of light pollution on biological rhythms of birds: An integrated, mechanistic perspective. J. Or-nithol. 2015, 156, 409–418.
86. Partecke, J.; Schwabl, I.; Gwinner, E. Stress and the city: Urbanization and its effects on the stress physiology in European blackbirds. Ecology 2006, 87, 1945–1952.
87. Fokidis, H.B.; Deviche, P. Plasma corticosterone of city and desert Curve-billed Thrashers, (Toxostoma curvirostre), in re-sponse to stress-related peptide administration. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2011, 159, 32–38.
88. Zhang, S.; Lei, F.; Liu, S.; Li, D.; Chen, C.; Wang, P. Variation in baseline corticosterone levels of Tree sparrow (Passer mon-tanus) populations along an urban gradient in Beijing, China. J. Ornithol. 2011, 152, 801–806.
89. Davies, S.; Rodriguez, N.S.; Sweazea, K.L.; Deviche, P. The effect of acute stress and long-term corticosteroid administration on plasma metabolites in an urban and Desert songbird. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2013, 86, 47–60.
90. Fokidis, H.B.; Deviche, P. Brain arginine vasotocin immunoreactivity differs between urban and desert curve-billed thrash-ers, (Toxostoma curvirostre): Relationships with territoriality and stress physiology. Brain Behav. Evol. 2012, 79, 84–97.
91. Yeh, P.J.; Price, T.D. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the successful colonization of a novel environment. Am. Nat. 2004, 164, 531–542.
92. Rodewald, A.D.; Shustack, D.P. Urban flight: Understanding individual and population-level responses of Nearctic–Neotropical migratory birds to urbanization. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77, 83–91.
93. Schoech, S.J.; Bowman, R.; Hahn, T.P.; Goymann, W.; Schwabl, I.; Bridge, E.S. The effects of low levels of light at night upon the endocrine physiology of Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica). J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 2013, 319, 527–538.
94. Brown, L.M.; Graham, C.H. Demography, traits and vulnerability to urbanization: Can we make generalizations? J. Appl. Ecol. 2015, 52, 1455–1464.
95. Iglesias-Carrasco, M.; Duchêne, D.A.; Head, M.L.; Møller, A.P.; Cain, K. Sex in the city: Sexual selection and urban coloniza-tion in passerines. Biol. Lett. 2019, 15, 20190257.
96. Dominoni, D.M.; Quetting, M.; Partecke, J. Long-term effects of chronic light pollution on seasonal functions of European blackbirds (Turdus merula). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e85069.
97. Dominoni, D.M.; Quetting, M.; Partecke, J. Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 280, 20123017.
98. Fudickar, A.M.; Greives, T.J.; Abolins-Abols, M.; Atwell, J.W.; Meddle, S.L.; Friis, G.; Stricker, C.A.; Ketterson, E.D. Mecha-nisms associated with an advance in the timing of seasonal reproduction in an urban songbird. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 85.
99. Partecke, J.; Gwinner, E. Increased sedentariness in European blackbirds following urbanization: A consequence of local adaptation? Ecology 2007, 88, 882–890.
100. Longcore, T. Sensory ecology: Night lights alter reproductive behavior of Blue tits. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, R893–R895.
101. Dominoni, D.M.; Goymann, W.; Helm, B.; Partecke, J. Urban-like night illumination reduces melatonin release in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): Implications of city life for biological time-keeping of songbirds. Front. Zool. 2013, 10, 60.
102. Reynolds, S.J.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Sumasgutner, P.; Mainwaring, M.C. Urbanization and nest building in birds: A review of threats and opportunities. J. Ornithol. 2019, 160, 841–860.
103. Wawrzyniak, J.; Kaliński, A.; Glądalski, M.; Bańbura, M.; Markowski, M.; Skwarska, J.; Kaliński, P.; Cyżewska, I.; Bańbura, J. Long-term variation in laying date and clutch size of the Great tit (Parus major) in central Poland: A comparison between urban parkland and deciduous forest. Ardeola 2015, 62, 311–323.
104. Møller, A.P. Successful city dwellers: A comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia 2009, 159, 849–858.
105. Isaksson, C. Urbanization, oxidative stress and inflammation: A question of evolving, acclimatizing or coping with urban environmental stress. Funct. Ecol. 2015, 29, 913–923.
106. Watson, H.; Videvall, E.; Andersson, M.N.; Isaksson, C. Transcriptome analysis of a wild bird reveals physiological re-sponses to the urban environment. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44180.
107. Costantini, D.; Greives, T.J.; Hau, M.; Partecke, J. Does urban life change blood oxidative status in birds? J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 2994–2997.
108. Fuller, R.A.; Warren, P.H.; Gaston, K.J. Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3, 368–370.
109. Nemeth, E.; Brumm, H. Birds and anthropogenic noise: Are urban songs adaptive? Am. Nat. 2010, 176, 465–475.
110. Slabbekoorn, H.; Ripmeester, E.A.P. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 72–83.
111. Slabbekoorn, H.; Boer-Visser, A. Cities change the songs of birds. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 2326–2331.
112. Laiolo, P. The Rufous-Collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis) utters higher frequency songs in urban habitats. Rev. Catalana d’Ornitologia 2011, 27, 25–30.
113. Luther, D.A.; Derryberry, E.P. Birdsongs keep pace with city life: Changes in song over time in an urban songbird affects communication. Anim. Behav. 2012, 83, 1059–1066.
114. Job, J.R.; Kohler, S.L.; Gill, S.A. Song adjustments by an open habitat bird to anthropogenic noise, urban structure, and veg-etation. Behav. Ecol. 2016, 27, 1734–1744.
115. LaZerte, S.E.; Otter, K.A.; Slabbekoorn, H. Mountain chickadees adjust songs, calls and chorus composition with increasing ambient and experimental anthropogenic noise. Urban Ecosyst. 2017, 20, 989–1000.
116. Cardoso, G.C.; Hu, Y.; Francis, C.D. The comparative evidence for urban species sorting by anthropogenic noise. R Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 172059.
117. Moiron, M.; González-Lagos, C.; Slabbekoorn, H.; Sol, D. Singing in the city: High song frequencies are no guarantee for urban success in birds. Behav. Ecol. 2015, 26, 843–850.
118. Luther, D.A.; Phillips, J.; Derryberry, E.P. Not so sexy in the city: Urban birds adjust songs to noise but compromise vocal performance. Behav. Ecol. 2016, 27, 332–340.
119. Narango, D.L.; Rodewald, A.D. Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural–urban gradient. Behav. Ecol. 2016, 27, 608–616.
120. Phillips, J.N.; Derryberry, E.P. Urban sparrows respond to a sexually selected trait with increased aggression in noise. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7505.
121. Ríos-Chelén, A.A.; Quirós-Guerrero, E.; Gil, D.; Macías-Garcia, C. Dealing with urban noise: Vermilion flycatchers sing longer songs in noisier territories. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2013, 67, 145–152.
122. Lowry, H.; Lill, A.; Wong, B.B.M. How noisy Does a noisy miner have to be? Amplitude adjustments of alarm calls in an avian urban ‘adapter’. PLoS ONE 2011, 7, e29960.
123. Potvin, D.A.; Mulder, R.A. Immediate, independent adjustment of call pitch and amplitude in response to varying back-ground noise by Silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Behav. Ecol. 2013, 24, 1363–1368.
124. Knight, C.R.; Swaddle, J.P. Eastern Bluebirds alter their song in response to anthropogenic changes in the acoustic envi-ronment. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2015, 55, 418–431.
125. Díaz, M.; Parra, A.; Gallardo, C. Serins respond to anthropogenic noise by increasing vocal activity. Behav. Ecol. 2011, 22, 332–336.
126. Redondo, P.; Barrantes, G.; Sandoval, L. Urban noise influences vocalization structure in the House wren (Troglodytes ae-don). Ibis 2013, 155, 621–625.
127. Moseley, D.L.; Phillips, J.N.; Derryberry, E.P.; Luther, D.A. Evidence for differing trajectories of songs in urban and rural populations. Behav. Ecol. 2019, 30, 1734–1742.
128. Potvin, D.A.; Mulder, R.A.; Parris, K.M. Silvereyes decrease acoustic frequency but increase efficacy of alarm calls in urban noise. Anim. Behav. 2014, 98, 27–33.
129. Potvin, D.A.; Parris, K.M.; Mulder, R.A. Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in Silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 2464–2469.
130. Seger-Fullam, K.D.; Rodewald, A.D.; Soha, J.A. Urban noise predicts song frequency in Northern cardinals and American robins. Bioacoustics 2011, 20, 267–276.
131. Shannon, G.; McKenna, M.F.; Angeloni, L.M.; Crooks, K.R.; Fristrup, K.M.; Brown, E.; Warner, K.A.; Nelson, M.D.; White, C.; Briggs, J.; et al. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biol. Rev. 2016, 91, 982–1005.
132. Fernández-Juricic, E.; Poston, R.; Collibus, K.D.; Morgan, T.; Bastain, B.; Martin, C.; Jones, K.; Treminio, R. Microhabitat se-lection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urban-ized landscape in the western U.S. Urban Habitats 2005, 3, 49–69.
133. Badyaev, A.V.; Young, R.L.; Oh, K.P.; Addison, C. Evolution on a local scale: Developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 2008, 62, 1951–1964.
134. Nordt, A.; Klenke, R. Sleepless in town—Drivers of the temporal shift in dawn song in urban European blackbirds. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71476.
135. Dorado-Correa, A.M.; Rodríguez-Rocha, M.; Brumm, H. Anthropogenic noise, but not artificial light levels predict song behavior in an equatorial bird. R Soc. Open Sci. 2016, 3, 160231.
136. Kempenaers, B.; Borgström, P.; Loës, P.; Schlicht, E.; Valcu, M. Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1735–1739.
137. Randler, C. Disturbances by dog barking increase vigilance in coots Fulica atra. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2006, 52, 265–270.
138. Bonnington, C.; Gaston, K.J.; Evans, K.L. Fearing the feline: Domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait-mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 15–24.
139. Rebolo-Ifrán, N.; Carrete, M.; Sanz-Aguilar, A.; Rodríguez-Martínez, S.; Cabezas, S.; Marchant, T.A.; Bortolotti, G.R.; Tella, J.L. Links between fear of humans, stress and survival support a non-random distribution of birds among urban and rural habitats. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13723.
140. Samia, D.S.M.; Nakagawa, S.; Nomura, F.; Rangel, T.F.; Blumstein, D.T. Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8877.
141. Eötvösa, C.B.; Magura, T.; Lövei, G.L. A meta-analysis indicates reduced predation pressure with increasing urbanization. Landsc. Urban Plan 2018, 180, 54–59.
142. Weaver, M.; Ligon, R.A.; Mousel, M.; McGraw, K.J. Avian anthrophobia? Behavioral and physiological responses of house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus) to human and predator threats across an urban gradient. Landsc. Urban Plan 2018, 179, 46–54.
143. McGiffin, A.; Lill, A.; Beckman, J.; Johnstone, C.P. Tolerance of human approaches by Common mynas along an urban-rural gradient. EMU Austral Ornithol. 2013, 113, 154–160.
144. Møller, A.P.; Grim, T.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Markó, G.; Tryjanowski, P. Change in flight initiation distance between urban and rural habitats following a cold winter. Behav. Ecol. 2013, 24, 1211–1217.
145. Møller, A.P.; Díaz, M.; Flensted-Jensen, E.; Grim, T.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Jokimäki, J.; Mänd, R.; Markó, G.; Tryjanowski, P. Urbanized birds have superior establishment success in novel environments. Oecologia 2015, 178, 943–950.
146. Vines, A.; Lill, A. Boldness and urban dwelling in little ravens. Wildl. Res. 2014, 42, 590–597.
147. Gravolin, I.; Key, M.; Lill, A. Boldness of urban Australian magpies and local traffic volume. Avian Biol. Res. 2014, 7, 244–250.
148. Samia, D.S.M.; Blumstein, D.T.; Díaz, M.; Grim, T.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D.; Jokimäki, J.; Tätte, K.; Markó, G.; Tryjanowski, P.; Møller, A.P. Rural-urban differences in escape behavior of European birds across a latitudinal gradient. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 66.
149. Morelli, F.; Mikula, P.; Benedetti, Y.; Bussière, R.; Jerzak, L.; Tryjanowski, P. Escape behavior of birds in urban parks and cemeteries across Europe: Evidence of behavioral adaptation to human activity. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631, 803–810.
150. Biondi, L.M.; Fuentes, G.M.; Córdoba, R.S.; Bó, M.S.; Cavalli, M.; Paterlini, C.A.; Castano, M.V.; García, G.O. Variation in boldness and novelty response between rural and urban predatory birds: The Chimango Caracara (Milvago chimango) as study case. Behav. Process 2020, 173, 104064.
151. Fleming, P.A.; Bateman, P.W. Scavenging opportunities modulate escape responses over a small geographic scale. Ethology 2017, 123, 205–212.
152. Feng, C.; Liang, W. Behavioral responses of black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) to artificial provisioning in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 21, e00873.
153. Pavlova, O.; Wronski, T. City gulls and their rural neighbours: Changes in escape and agonistic behaviour along a ru-ral-to-urban gradient. In Advances in Environmental Research; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2020.
154. Møller, A.P. Interspecific variation in fear responses predicts urbanization in birds. Behav. Ecol. 2010, 21, 365–371.
155. Kitchen, K.; Lill, A.; Price, M. Tolerance of human disturbance by urban magpie-larks. Aust. Field Ornithol. 2010, 27, 1.
156. Gendall, J.; Lill, A.; Beckman, J. Tolerance of disturbance by humans in long-time resident and recent colonist urban doves. Avian Res. 2015, 6, 7.
157. Sol, D.; Maspons, J.; Gonzalez-Voyer, A.; Morales-Castilla, I.; Garamszegi, L.Z.; Møller, A.P. Risk-taking behavior, urbani-zation and the pace of life in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2018, 72, 59–66.
158. Sol, D.; Griffin, A.S.; Bartomeus, I.; Boyce, H. Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an inva-sive bird. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19535.
159. Shanahan, D.F.; Strohbach, M.W.; Warren, P.S.; Fuller, R.A. The challenges of urban living. In Avian Urban Ecology; Diego, G., Henrik, B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 3–20.
160. Griffin, A.S.; Netto, K.; Peneaux, C. Neophilia, innovation and learning in an urbanized world: A critical evaluation of mixed findings. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2017, 17, 15–22.
161. Seress, G.; Bókony, V.; Heszberger, J.; Liker, A. Response to predation risk in urban and rural house sparrows. Ethology 2011, 117, 896–907.
162. Møller, A.P.; Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D. Escape behavior of birds provides evidence of predation being involved in urbanization. Anim. Behav. 2012, 84, 341–348.
163. Tryjanowski, P.; Møller, A.P.; Morelli, F.; Biaduń, W.; Brauze, T.; Ciach, M.; Czechowski, P.; Czyż, S.; Dulisz, B.; Goławski, A.; et al. Urbanization affects neophilia and risk-taking at bird-feeders. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28575.
164. Audet, J.N.; Ducatez, S.; Lefebvre, L. The town bird and the country bird: Problem solving and immune-competence vary with urbanization. Behav. Ecol. 2016, 27, 637–644.
165. Papp, S.; Vincze, E.; Preiszner, B.; Liker, A.; Bókony, V. A comparison of problem-solving success between urban and rural house sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2015, 9, 471–480.
166. Ducatez, S.; Audet, J.N.; Ros, J.; Kayello, R.L.; Lefebvre, L. Innovativeness and the effects of urbanization on risk-taking be-haviors in wild Barbados birds. Anim. Cogn. 2017, 20, 33–42.
167. Spelt, A.; Soutar, O.; Williamson, C.; Memmott, J.; Shamoun-Baranes, J.; Rock, P.; Windsor, S. Urban gulls adapt foraging schedule to human-activity patterns. Ibis 2020, 163, 274–282.
168. Yosef, R.; Zduniak, P.; Poliakov, Y.; Fingerman, A. Behavioural and reproductive flexibility of an invasive bird in an arid zone: A case of the Indian House Crow (Corvus splendens). J. Arid Environ. 2019, 168, 56–58.
169. Bókony, V.; Kulcsár, A.; Tóth, Z.; Liker, A. Personality traits and behavioral syndromes in differently urbanized popula-tions of house sparrows (Passer domesticus). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36639.
170. Kozlovsky, D.Y.; Weissgerber, E.A.; Pravosudov, V.V. What makes specialized food-caching mountain chickadees successful city slickers? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 284, 20162613.
171. Greggor, A.L.; Clayton, N.S.; Fulford, A.J.C.; Thornton, A. Street smart: Faster approach towards litter in urban areas by highly neophobic corvids and less fearful birds. Anim. Behav. 2016, 117, 123–133.
172. Lill, A.; Hales, E. Behavioral and ecological keys to urban colonization by Little Ravens (Corvus mellori). Open Ornithol. J. 2015, 8, 22–31.
173. Campbell, M. An animal geography of avian feeding habits in Peterborough, Ontario. Area 2008, 40, 472–480.
174. Evans, J.; Boudreau, K.; Hyman, J. Behavioral syndromes in urban and rural populations of Song sparrows. Ethology 2010, 116, 588–595.
175. Scales, J.; Hyman, J.; Hughes, M. Behavioral syndromes break down in urban Song sparrow populations. Ethology 2011, 117, 887–895.
176. Hasegawa, M.; Ligon, R.A.; Giraudeau, M.; Watanabe, M.; McGraw, K.J. Urban and colorful male house finches are less ag-gressive. Behav. Ecol. 2014, 25, 641–649.
177. Hardman, S.I.; Dalesman, S. Repeatability and degree of territorial aggression differs among urban and rural Great tits (Parus major). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5042.
178. Galbreath, D.M.; Ichinose, T.; Furutani, T.; Yan, W.; Higuchi, H. Urbanization and its implications for avian aggression: A case study of urban black kites (Milvus migrans) along Sagami Bay in Japan. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 169–178.
179. McClelland, S.C.; Ribeiro, R.D.; Mielke, H.W.; Finkelstein, M.E.; Gonzales, C.R.; Jones, J.A.; Komdeur, J.; Derryberry, E.; Saltzberg, E.B.; Karubian, J. Sub-lethal exposure to lead is associated with heightened aggression in an urban songbird. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 593–603.
180. Kunca, T.; Yosef, R. Differential nest-defense to perceived danger in urban and rural areas by female Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus). PeerJ 2016, 4, e2070.
181. Senar, J.C.; Garamszegi, L.Z.; Tilgar, V.; Biard, C.; Moreno-Rueda, G.; Salmón, P.; Rivas, J.; Sprau, P.; Dingemanse, N.J.; Charmantier, A.; et al. Urban Great tits (Parus major) show higher distress calling and pecking rates than rural birds across Europe. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 163.
182. Minias, P.; Jedlikowski, J.; Włodarczyk, R. Development of urban behavior is associated with time since urbanization in a reed-nesting waterbird. Urban Ecosyst. 2018, 21, 1021–1028.
183. Alberti, M.; Marzluff, J.; Hunt, V.M. Urban driven phenotypic changes: Empirical observations and theoretical implications for eco-evolutionary feedback. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2017, 372, 20160029.
184. Capilla-Lasheras, P.; Dominoni, D.M.; Babayan, S.A.; O’Shaughnessy, P.J.; Mladenova, M.; Woodford, L.; Pollock, C.J.; Barr, T.; Baldini, F.; Helm, B. Elevated immune gene expression is associated with poor reproductive success of urban Blue tits. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 64.
185. Mueller, J.C.; Partecke, J.; Hatchwell, B.J.; Gaston, K.J.; Evans, K.L. Candidate gene polymorphisms for behavioral adapta-tions during urbanization in blackbirds. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 3629–3637.
186. Partecke, J.; Gwinner, E.; Bensch, S. Is urbanization of European blackbirds (Turdus merula) associated with genetic differ-entiation? J. Ornithol. 2006, 147, 549–552.
187. Richards, D.R.; Passy, P.; Oh, R.R. Impacts of population density and wealth on the quantity and structure of urban green space in tropical Southeast Asia. Landsc. Urban Plan 2017, 157, 553–560.
188. Harper, G.A.; Bunbury, N. Invasive rats on tropical islands: Their population biology and impacts on native species. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2015, 3, 607–627.
189. Ferenc, M.; Sedláček, O.; Fuchs, R. How to improve urban greenspace for woodland birds: Site and local-scale determinants of bird species richness. Urban Ecosyst. 2014, 17, 625–640.
190. Moreno-Mateos, D.; Rey Benayas, J.M.; Pérez-Camacho, L.; Montaña, E.D.L.; Rebollo, S.; Cayuela, L. Effects of land use on nocturnal birds in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape. Acta Ornithol. 2011, 46, 173–182.
191. Moreno-Mateos, D.; Rey Benayas, J.M.; Pérez-Camacho, L.; Montaña, E.D.L.; Rebollo, S.; Cayuela, L. Effects of land use on nocturnal birds in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape. Acta Ornithol. 2011, 46, 173–182.