Passive Control of Base Pressure: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Vivi Li and Version 1 by Ambareen Khan.
In the present world, passive control finds application in various areas like flow over blunt projectiles, missiles, supersonic parallel diffusers (for cruise correction), the engine of jets, static testbeds of rockets, the ports of internal combustion engines, vernier rockets, and single expansion ramp nozzle (SERN) rockets. In this review, various passive control techniques to control the base pressure and regulate the drag force are discussed. In the study, papers ranging from subsonic, sonic, and supersonic flow are discussed. Different types of passive control management techniques like cavity, ribs, dimple, static cylinder, spikes, etc., are discussed in this review article.

In the present world, passive control finds application in various areas like flow over blunt projectiles, missiles, supersonic parallel diffusers (for cruise correction), the engine of jets, static testbeds of rockets, the ports of internal combustion engines, vernier rockets, and single expansion ramp nozzle (SERN) rockets. In this study, various passive control techniques to control the base pressure and regulate the drag force are discussed. In the study, papers ranging from subsonic, sonic, and supersonic flow are discussed. Different types of passive control management techniques like cavity, ribs, dimple, static cylinder, spikes, etc., are discussed in this review article.

  • base pressure
  • drag
  • recirculation zone
  • mach number
  • passive control
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Hsu, C.-W.; Lin, S.-Y. Investigation of characteristics of shear layer: Application of synthetic jet in backward-facing step flow field. Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng. 2016, 40, 787–797.
  2. Rajendran, P.; Sethuraman, V.; Khan, S.A. Base and wall pressure control using cavities and ribs in suddenly expanded flows-an overview. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2020, 66, 120–134.
  3. Wang, F.; Gao, A.; Wu, S.; Zhu, S.; Dai, J.; Liao, Q. Experimental Investigation of Coherent Vortex Structures in a Backward-Facing Step Flow. Water 2019, 11, 2629.
  4. Ashcroft, G.; Zhang, X. Vortical structures over rectangular cavities at low speed. Phys. Fluids 2005, 17, 015104.
  5. Pandey, K.M.; Rathakrishnan, E. Annular Cavities for Base Flow Control. Int. J. Turbo Jet-Engines 2006, 23, 113–128.
  6. Khan, S.A.; Mohammed, A.; GM, F.A. Passive control of base drag in compressible subsonic flow using multiple cavity. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018, 8, 39–44.
  7. Khan, S.A.; Al Robaian, A.A.; Asadullah, M.; Khan, A.M. Grooved cavity as a passive controller behind backward facing step. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2019, 53, 185–193.
  8. Vikramaditya, N.S.; Viji, M.; Verma, S.B.; Ali, N.; Thakur, D.N. Base Pressure Fluctuations on Typical Missile Configuration in Presence of Base Cavity. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2018, 55, 335–345.
  9. Mariotti, A.; Buresti, G.; Gaggini, G.; Salvetti, M.V. Separation control and drag reduction for boat-tailed axisymmetric bodies through contoured transverse grooves. J. Fluid Mech. 2017, 832, 514–549.
  10. Howell, J.; Sims-Williams, D.; Sprot, A.; Hamlin, F.; Dominy, R. Bluff Body Drag Reduction with Ventilated Base Cavities. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 2012, 5, 152–160.
  11. Bonnavion, G.; Cadot, O.; Herbert, V.; Parpais, S.; Vigneron, R.; Delery, J. Effect of a base cavity on the wake modes of the squareback Ahmed body at various ground clearances and application to drag reduction. In Congrès Français de Mécanique; Association Française de Mécanique (AFM): Lille, France, 2017.
  12. Ahmed, S.R.; Ramm, G.; Faltin, G. Some Salient Features of the Time-Averaged Ground Vehicle Wake. SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 1984, 473–503.
  13. Lucas, J.-M.; Cadot, O.; Herbert, V.; Parpais, S.; Délery, J. A numerical investigation of the asymmetric wake mode of a squareback Ahmed body—Effect of a base cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 2017, 831, 675–697.
  14. Rathakrishnan, E. Effect of ribs on suddenly expanded flows. AIAA J. 2001, 39, 1402–1404.
  15. Yedlapalli, S.; Vijayaraja, A.V.K.; Rathakrishnan, E. Base Pressure Control by using Ribs in Subsonic and Sonic Suddenly Expanded Flows. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Experimental Fluid Mechanics, Andhra Pradesh, India, 3–6 March 2008.
  16. Nathan, K.R.; Vijayaraja, K.; Elangovan, S.; Rathakrishnan, E. Effect of Annular Rib Position in Suddenly Expanded Supersonic Flow. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace Science and Technology, Bangalore, India, 26–28 June 2008.
  17. Vijayaraja, K.; Senthilkumar, C.; Elangovan, S.; Rathakrishnan, E. Base Pressure Control with Annular Ribs. Int. J. Turbo Jet-Engines 2014, 31, 111–118.
  18. Khan, A.; Mazlan, N.M.; Ismail, M.A. Analysis of Flow through a Convergent Nozzle at Sonic Mach Number for Area Ratio 4. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2019, 62, 66–79.
  19. Khan, S.A.; Asadullah, M.; Sadhiq, J. Passive control of base drag employing dimple in subsonic suddenly expanded flow. Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng. IJMME-IJENS 2018, 18, 69–74.
  20. Asadullah, M.; Khan, S.A.; Asrar, W.; Sulaeman, E. Passive control of base pressure with static cylinder at supersonic flow. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 370, p. 012050.
  21. Khan, S.A.; Ullah, M.A.; Ahmed, G.F.; Jalaluddin, A.; Baig, M.A.A. Flow control with aero-spike behind bluff body. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018, 8, 1001–1008.
  22. Mehta, R. Drag reduction for payload fairing of satellite launch vehicle with aerospike in transonic and low supersonic speeds. Adv. Aircr. Spacecr. Sci. 2020, 7, 371–385.
  23. Khan, S.A.; Alrobaian, A.A.; Asad Ullah, M.; Rao, A. Threaded spikes for bluff body base flow control. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2019, 53, 194–203.
More
Video Production Service