Quorum Sensing Regulation: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Lily Guo and Version 1 by Florence Hommais.

Quorum sensing is a type of chemical communication by which bacterial populations control expression of their genes in a coordinated manner. This regulatory mechanism is commonly used by pathogens to control the expression of genes encoding virulence factors and that of genes involved in the bacterial adaptation to variations in environmental conditions. In phytopathogenic bacteria, several mechanisms of quorum sensing have been characterized. In this review, we describe the different quorum sensing systems present in phytopathogenic bacteria, such as those using the signal molecules named N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL), diffusible signal factor (DSF), and the unknown signal molecule of the virulence factor modulating (VFM) system. We focus on studies performed on phytopathogenic bacteria of major importance, including Pseudomonas, Ralstonia, Agrobacterium, Xanthomonas, Erwinia, Xylella,Dickeya, and Pectobacterium spp. For each system, we present the mechanism of regulation, the functions targeted by the quorum sensing system, and the mechanisms by which quorum sensing is regulated.

  • : N-acyl-homoserine lactone
  • diffusible signal factor

1. Introduction

Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell-to-cell communication mechanism used by bacteria for promoting collective behavior within a population. This cooperative behavior relies on the production, detection, and response to signal molecules in a cell-density-dependent manner. At a low cell density, a basal level of the signal molecule is produced by bacteria. Signal molecules can be diffused or exported into the extracellular environment. As bacterial density increases, signal molecules accumulate. After reaching a threshold, signal molecules are perceived by the bacteria, which initiate a set of biological activities in a coordinated fashion. Acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) was the first signal molecule, identified in the 1980s [1,2]. Originally discovered in the bioluminescent marine bacterium

(QS) is a cell-to-cell communication mechanism used by bacteria for promoting collective behavior within a population. This cooperative behavior relies on the production, detection, and response to signal molecules in a cell-density-dependent manner. At a low cell density, a basal level of the signal molecule is produced by bacteria. Signal molecules can be diffused or exported into the extracellular environment. As bacterial density increases, signal molecules accumulate. After reaching a threshold, signal molecules are perceived by the bacteria, which initiate a set of biological activities in a coordinated fashion. Acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) was the first signal molecule, identified in the 1980s[1][2]. Originally discovered in the bioluminescent marine bacterium

Aliivibrio fischneri

, these signal molecules were later characterized in a plethora of bacteria including

Pectobacterium carotovorum

(formerly named

Erwinia

),

Agrobacterium tumefaciens

,

Citrobacter amalonaticus

, and

Pseudomonas aeruginosa [3,4]. Since then, several other types of QS signals have been identified, and most QS signals are either small organic molecules or peptides with 5 to 20 amino acids. In Gram-positive bacteria, the signal molecules are mainly peptides [5], while in Gram-negative bacteria, they are organic molecules smaller than 1000 Da. A universal signal described as autoinducer 2 (AI-2) is also produced by some Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. These signal molecules are produced (i) at a specific growth stage, (ii) under particular physiological conditions, or (iii) in response to an environmental change. QS controls the expression of the many genes involved in a variety of functions, such as biofilm formation, toxin production, exopolysaccharide synthesis, extracellular enzyme production, motility, and plasmid conjugation. In pathogenic bacteria and, therefore, in plant pathogenic bacteria, QS plays a major role in the regulation of virulence factor productions and the infectious processes.

[3][4]. Since then, several other types of QS signals have been identified, and most QS signals are either small organic molecules or peptides with 5 to 20 amino acids. In Gram-positive bacteria, the signal molecules are mainly peptides[5], while in Gram-negative bacteria, they are organic molecules smaller than 1000 Da. A universal signal described as autoinducer 2 (AI-2) is also produced by some Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. These signal molecules are produced (i) at a specific growth stage, (ii) under particular physiological conditions, or (iii) in response to an environmental change. QS controls the expression of the many genes involved in a variety of functions, such as biofilm formation, toxin production, exopolysaccharide synthesis, extracellular enzyme production, motility, and plasmid conjugation. In pathogenic bacteria and, therefore, in plant pathogenic bacteria, QS plays a major role in the regulation of virulence factor productions and the infectious processes. 

This entry aims to describe how phytopathogenic bacteria incorporate QS mechanisms into the complex regulatory cascades that control genes in pathogenicity and colonization of the host, and thereby update the data reviewed more than 15 years ago in Von Bodman et al. [6]. We present QS systems harbored by phytopathogenic bacteria, i.e., the ones relying on AHL or diffusible signal factors (DSF), in addition to the virulence factor modulating (VFM) system. For each of these systems, we present the regulatory mechanism, the target genes of QS, and the mechanisms that are involved in the QS process. Mansfield et al. previously listed 10 species of phytopathogenic bacteria of major economic and scientific importance [

7

]. Here, we focus on the QS systems present in these species, including

Pseudomonas syringae

,

Ralstonia solanacearum

,

Agrobacterium tumefaciens

spp., bacteria of the genus

Xanthomonas

spp.,

Erwinia amylovora

,

Xylella fastidiosa

,

Dickeya

spp., and

Pectobacterium

spp. (

Table 1

).

Table 1.

Quorum screening (QS) systems present in bacterial plant pathogen species. The table presents a ranked list of the bacteria according to Mansfield et al.

Top 10 Rank [7]

Top 10 Rank [7]

 Bacterial Pathogen Species

Bacterial Pathogen Species

 QS Mechanisms

QS Mechanisms

 Involvement in Virulence

Involvement in Virulence
1

1

 Pseudomonas syringae

Pseudomonas syringae

 AHL

AHL

 Yes

Yes
2

2

 Ralstonia solanacearum

Ralstonia solanacearum

 AHL

AHL

 No

No
DSF-derived signals

DSF-derived signals

 Yes

Yes
3

3

 Agrobacterium tumefaciens with pTi

Agrobacterium tumefaciens with pTi

 AHL

AHL

 Yes

Yes
4

4

 Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae

Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae

 DSF

DSF

 Yes

Yes
5

5

 Xanthomonas campestris pv

Xanthomonas campestris pv

 DSF

DSF

 Yes

Yes
6

6

 Xanthomonas axonopodis pv

Xanthomonas axonopodis pv

 DSF

DSF

 Yes

Yes
7

7

 Erwinia amylovora

Erwinia amylovora

 AHL

AHL

 Yes *

Yes *
8

8

 Xylella fastidiosa

Xylella fastidiosa

 DSF

DSF

 Yes

Yes
9

9

 Dickeya spp.

Dickeya spp.

 AHL

AHL

 No **

No **
Vfm

Vfm

 Yes

Yes
10

10

 Pectobacterium carotovorum (and atrosepticum)

Pectobacterium carotovorum (and atrosepticum)

 AHL

AHL

 Yes

Yes
* probably strain-dependent; ** species-dependent.

2. Diffusible Signal Factor-Mediated Quorum Sensing

Diffusible-Signal-Factor-Mediated QS is only present in three of the top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria:

Xanthomonas oryzae

pv.

oryzae

(Xoo),

Xanthomonas campestriss

(Xcc),

Xanthomonas axonapodis,

and

Xylella fastidiosa

. In addition,

R. solanacearum

can produce a DSF-derived signal molecule (

Table 1).

2.1. Overview of DSF-Mediated Quorum Sensing

The Diffusible Signal Factor (DSF) family of signals features intriguing types of QS signal molecules found in diverse Gram-negative bacteria. Signal molecules are

).

2.1. Overview of DSF-Mediated Quorum Sensing

The Diffusible Signal Factor (DSF) family of signals features intriguing types of QS signal molecules found in diverse Gram-negative bacteria. Signal molecules are

cis-2-unsaturated fatty acids that share a fatty acid carbon chain with variations in length, double-bond configurations, and side-chains [76]. Structural variants were mostly characterized using purification from culture supernatants followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). A much greater diversity of signals than previously anticipated was identified, including

2-unsaturated fatty acids that share a fatty acid carbon chain with variations in length, double-bond configurations, and side-chains[7]. Structural variants were mostly characterized using purification from culture supernatants followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). A much greater diversity of signals than previously anticipated was identified, including

cis

-2-dodecenoic acid (BDSF),

cis

,

cis

-11-methyldodeca-2,5-dienoic acid (CDSF),

cis

-2- and

trans

-2-decenoic acid (SDSF),

cis

-10-methyl-2-dodecenoic acid (IDSF or DSF-II),

cis

-9-methyl-2-decenoic acid,

cis

-2-undecenoic acid, 2-

cis

-unsaturated fatty acids (with the unsaturated fatty acids being 2-tetradecenoic acid (XfDSF1) or 2-

cis

-hexadecanoic acid (XfDSF2)), and 13-methyltetradecanoic acid (LeDSF3) (

Figure 3

,

Table 3) [77]. A given organism can produce several signal molecules. Moreover, the growth environment affects the nature of the DSF variants [78,79].

)[8]. A given organism can produce several signal molecules. Moreover, the growth environment affects the nature of the DSF variants[9][10].                   

Microorganisms 09 00239 g003 550
Figure 21.

General structure of the Diffusible Signal Factor (DSF). Signal molecules are

cis-

2-unsaturated fatty acids. Fatty acid carbon chains vary in their lengths, double-bond configurations, and side-chain modifications, particularly methylation. Fatty acid carbon chains range from 8 to 14 carbons. A given species is able to produce different molecules. Methylation occurs at the first carbon for

R. solanacearum

signal molecules 3-OH-PAME or 3-OH-MAME.

Table 2.

Overview of DSF-mediated

quorum-sensing processes in phytopathogenic bacteria.

processes in phytopathogenic bacteria.

Signal MoleculeSpeciesStudied StrainsQS SystemPathologyHostsTargeted FunctionsReferences
OHHL

OOHL		Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci11528PsyI/PsyRWild-fire diseaseTobacco plantsSwarming, flagellum synthesis, assembly of pili, biofilm formation, chemotaxis, colonization, epiphytic viability, SST2, SST6, alginate synthesis[11][12][13][14]
No production of AHLPseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae PsaR1, PsaR2, PsaR3Bacterial cankerKiwifruit plantsRegulation of traits associated with survival in planta, cellular multiplication, swarming, oxidative stress resistance[15][16]
HHL

C8-HSL		Ralstonia solanacearumGMI1000SolI/

SolR		Wilting No Data[6][17][18][19]
OOHLAgrobacterium fabrum (tumefaciens)C58TraI/

TraR		Crown Gall DNA replication, plasmid segregation in daughter cells, conjugative transfer of plasmid Ti[20][21][22][23][24][25]
OHHL

HHL		Erwinia amylovoraEa2EamR/EamIfire blightApple, PearAmylovoran, levan, tolerance to hydrogen peroxide[26][27][28][29][30]
OHHL

HHL

DHL		Dickeya dadantii3937ExpR/ExpISoft rotPineapple, Potato, Sweet potato, Banana, Maize,

Dianthus spp., Philodendron, Pelargonium, Saintpaulia		No implication in virulence[31][32][33]
OHHL

OOHL		Dickeya zeaeEC1ExpR/ExpISoft rotMaize, Potato, Pineapple, Banana, Tobacco, Rice, Brachiaria, ChrysanthemumSwarming, pigment synthesis, cellular aggregate formation, plant colonization, rice seed germination No implication in PCWDE production[34]
OHHL

HHL		Dickeya solani ExpR/ExpISoft rotPotato, HyacinthPCWDEs[35]
OHHL

OOHL		Pectobacterium carotovorum ExpI/ExpR1—ExpR2 CarR/CarISoft rotPotato, carrot, green pepperPCWDEs, oxidative stress resistance, antimicrobial activity,

carbapenem biosynthesis		[4][6][36][37]
OOHL

C8-HSL

OHHL		Pectobacterium atrosepticum ExpR/ExpISoft rotPotato and chicoryPectates lyases[36][37][38][39][40][41]
OHHLPantoea stewartiisubsp. stewartii  Leaf blight and Stewart diseaseCornMobility, stewartan production, carotinoids pigments[42][43]

OHHL: N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-HSL; HHL: N-(hexanoyl)-HSL; DHL: N-(decanoyl)-HSL; OOHL: N-(3-oxo-octanoyl)-HSL; HSL: Homoserine Lactone; SST2 and SST6: secretion system type 2 and 6, respectively; PCWDE: plant cell wall degrading enzymes.

 

 

 

Three different types of DSF-mediated QS systems were defined. Classification depends on the genomic context of the involved genes. While the first group contains DSF systems whose genes encoding key signaling components are colocalized on the genome, systems belonging to the second group gather genes that are not clustered in the genome. Finally, the third class contains DSF systems whose genes are not clearly identified [77]. Systems belonging to the first group were first identified and characterized in the phytopathogen

Three different types of DSF-mediated QS systems were defined. Classification depends on the genomic context of the involved genes. While the first group contains DSF systems whose genes encoding key signaling components are colocalized on the genome, systems belonging to the second group gather genes that are not clustered in the genome. Finally, the third class contains DSF systems whose genes are not clearly identified[8]. Systems belonging to the first group were first identified and characterized in the phytopathogen

Xanthomonas campestris

pv.

campestris

(Xcc), which is responsible for black rot in crucifers. To date, every DSF system identified in plant pathogenic bacteria belongs to this first class. These DSF systems have also been studied in other

Xanthomonas

species and in

Xylella fastidiosa.

Briefly, three genes named

rpfF

,

rpfC

, and

rpfG encode the main components of the DSF biosynthetic pathway, which depends on fatty acid biosynthesis. RpfF is a DSF synthase, and RpfC–RpfG is a two-component regulatory system involved in signal perception and transduction. RpfF is a bifunctional enzyme with thioesterase activity that first cleaves the thioester bonds of acyl-ACPs to release holo–ACPs, and then its enoyl-CoA hydratase activity dehydrates the holo–ACP substrates to the final product [79]. RpfF is active towards acyl-ACP substrates, with carbon chains ranging from 8 to 14. A given RpfF protein is able to produce multiple DSF signals [90,91]. RpfC is the DSF sensor, composed of a transmembrane domain (TM), an histidine kinase domain (HK), a receiver domain (REC), and a histidine phosphotransferase domain (HTP) [76]. The mechanism by which DSF is detected by this sensor is still unknown, but the sensor uses a phospho-relay mechanism to transfer the signal to the response regulator RpfG (

encode the main components of the DSF biosynthetic pathway, which depends on fatty acid biosynthesis. RpfF is a DSF synthase, and RpfC–RpfG is a two-component regulatory system involved in signal perception and transduction. RpfF is a bifunctional enzyme with thioesterase activity that first cleaves the thioester bonds of acyl-ACPs to release holo–ACPs, and then its enoyl-CoA hydratase activity dehydrates the holo–ACP substrates to the final product[10] RpfF is active towards acyl-ACP substrates, with carbon chains ranging from 8 to 14. A given RpfF protein is able to produce multiple DSF signals[44][45]. RpfC is the DSF sensor, composed of a transmembrane domain (TM), an histidine kinase domain (HK), a receiver domain (REC), and a histidine phosphotransferase domain (HTP)[7]. The mechanism by which DSF is detected by this sensor is still unknown, but the sensor uses a phospho-relay mechanism to transfer the signal to the response regulator RpfG (

Figure 4) [77,80,92,93]. The RpfG N-terminal response regulator (RR) domain interacts directly with RpfC, whereas its HD-GYP domain has phosphodiesterase activity that is activated by the DSF signal. This domain degrades cyclic di-GMP into two GMP molecules. Cyclic di-GMP binds to the global transcription factor Clp and represses

) [8][46][47][48]. The RpfG N-terminal response regulator (RR) domain interacts directly with RpfC, whereas its HD-GYP domain has phosphodiesterase activity that is activated by the DSF signal. This domain degrades cyclic di-GMP into two GMP molecules. Cyclic di-GMP binds to the global transcription factor Clp and represses

rpfB expression. When cyclic di-GMP is degraded, free forms of Clp dominate, which drives the expression of several hundred genes, including those encoding virulence factors [94].

expression. When cyclic di-GMP is degraded, free forms of Clp dominate, which drives the expression of several hundred genes, including those encoding virulence factors[49].

Microorganisms 09 00239 g004 550
Figure 4.

The Diffusible Signal Factor-mediated

quorum-sensing

(DSF-QS) system. In phytopathogenic bacteria, the DSF system is encoded by the

rpf

gene cluster. RpfF is a bifunctional enzyme involved in the production of DSF molecules. RpfB is proposed to be involved in DSF turnover. RpfC–RpfG is a two-component regulatory system that is involved in signal perception and transduction. RpfC is a DSF sensor that uses a phospho-relay mechanism to transfer the signal to the response regulator, RpfG. The N-terminal RR response domain of RpfG interacts directly with RpfC. Its HD-GYP domain then degrades cyclic di-GMP. RpfC can also bind to RpfF using its C-terminal REC domain and negatively regulates DSF biosynthesis. At a low cell density, (i) RpfC forms a complex with RpfF, blocking its enzymatic activity and inhibiting DSF signal biosynthesis, and (ii) cyclic di-GMP binds to the global transcription factor Clp, which represses

rpfB

expression. At a high cell density, RpfF is released and produces DSF signals, which allow the induction of QS regulation. Cyclic di-GMP is degraded by the HD-GYP domain of RpfG, and

rpfB

is expressed, like several genes encoding virulence factors activated by Clp.

 

2.2. Functions Regulated by DSF-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Plant Pathogens

2.2.1. Xanthomonas spp. Including X. oryzae, X. campestris, and X. axonopodis

Xanthomonas spp. are yellow-pigmented bacteria, several species of which are phytopathogens associated with economically important crops worldwide. Bacteria from this genus are responsible for diseases on approximatively 400 plant species (124 monocots and 268 dicots), including rice, wheat, citrus, tomato, pepper, banana, and bean. There is a high degree of specificity between the host plant and the Xanthomonas species and pathovars [81][50]. Infection is divided into two stages: the epiphytic stage and the endophytic stage. Briefly, the pathogen penetrates into a new host via plant natural openings and wounds, colonizes the host, and invades either the vascular system or the intercellular spaces of the mesophyll parenchyma tissue. Virulence factors are mainly type III secretion systems (T3SS) and the effectors secreted by these systems. In addition, other pathogenicity factors have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the virulence, such as PCWDEs, type IV secreted effectors, adhesins, and lipopolysaccharides [82][51]. It has been clearly demonstrated that Xcc recruits DSF to synchronize virulence gene expression. Transcriptome analyses of mutant strains modified in the production of DSF led to the identification of 165 genes whose expression is significantly varied. Among these genes are those involved in extracellular enzyme and extracellular polysaccharide production, flagella synthesis, iron uptake, aerobic respiration, resistance to toxins, and oxidative stress [83]. Phenotypes associated with these genes are complemented by the addition of DSF signals [83,95]. Additionally, DSF is involved in biofilm formation [92]. DSF has also been implicated in the intricate crosstalk between Xanthomonas spp. and their host plants. DSF facilitates Xanthomonas spp. entry into host plants [84]. DSF elicits innate immunity and the secretion of xanthan, the main exopolysaccharide that suppresses the DSF-induced innate immunity in Xcc [85]. Taken together, these indicate that plants have evolved to recognize a widely conserved bacterial communication system [85].
Finally, studies of the DSF system in Xoo, the causative agent of rice bacterial blight disease, and in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag), which is responsible for the bacterial pustule of soybean, demonstrated that the mechanisms for DSF biosynthesis and regulation are conserved and promote the regulation of virulence factor productions or factors associated with virulence in both pathovars [86,87]. In Xag, the regulated extracellular enzymes are mainly carboxyl–methyl cellulases, proteases, endo-β-1,4-mannanases, and pectate lyases [87]. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][44][45]

2.2.2. In Xylella fastidiosa

Xyllella fastidiosa, which is divided into four subspecies, belongs to the Xanthomonadaceae genus [88]. Xyllella fastidiosa is a vascular wilt pathogen that has a wide host range of over 350 plant species, including almond leaves, lemons, and olive trees. X. fastidiosa is always found in the xylem tissue of its plant host or in the foregut of its xylem-feeding hemipteran insect vector. In contrast to other Xanthomonads, X. fastidiosa does not carry T3SS, and the symptoms associated with this pathogen depend on the capacity of the bacteria to colonize and block xylem vessels, leading to drought stress. Hence, attachment, motility, and biofilm formation are important for infection [7,88]. A study of rpfF and rpfC mutants in X. fastidiosa showed that switching between the plant host and insect vectors is regulated by QS (Table 3). DSF-mediated QS also controls virulence factors, such as adhesins, migration in xylem vessels, and the colonization of insect vectors [88,89]. At a high cell density, DSF-mediated QS promotes cell stickiness, thereby encouraging attachment to the xylem wall [88]. In addition, outer membrane vesicle (OMV) production is repressed via DSF by an unknown mechanism [96]. OMVs block bacterial interactions with the xylem vessel walls. Taken together, this interaction indicates that DSF-mediated QS favors X. fastidiosa attachment to the vessels. This phenomenon has been proposed to help bacterial acquisition by insects [89].
In summary, X. fastidiosa coordinates its behavior according to its infection stages (insect vectors vs. plant host) and population size using a DSF-mediated QS similar to that present in Xanthomonas spp. [89].

2.2.2. Other DSF-Derived Signals

As mentioned before, the R. solanacearum species complex carries two QS systems—one depending on AHL signals, which does not seem to be involved in the regulation of virulence, and a second one whose signal molecules are close to the DSF family. This system regulates the virulence of R. solanacearum species [97]. The R. solanacearum species complex is divided into two clades, depending on their QS signal types, with one being the (R)-methyl 3-hydroxymyristate (or 3-OH-MAME) and the second one being (R)-methyl 3-hydroxypalmitate (or 3-OH-PAME) [48,98]. PhcB methyltransferases synthesize both QS signals from the cognate fatty acids, but the specific production of signals depends on the strains [49]. The QS signal is recognized by the two-component regulatory system PhcS–PhcR. In the absence of a signal, PhcR inhibits the PhcA regulator, which activates the production of exopolysaccharides and PCWDEs. In the presence of the signal, PhcR is phosphorylated by PhcS, which inhibits it, and thereby increases the number of functional PhcA and the production of virulence factors [97]. In this way, early and late virulence factors are coordinately controlled by cell density, allowing the proper expression of genes encoding virulence factors, which is important for the success of the infectious process.

 

2.2. Induction, Maintenance, and Turnover of DSF-Mediated Quorum Sensing

2.2. Induction, Maintenance, and Turnover of DSF-Mediated Quorum Sensing

2.2.1. Induction and Maintenance

In Xcc, DSF biosynthesis is autoregulated by a posttranslational mechanism [95]. In addition to its interaction with RpfG, RpfC can also bind to RpfF using its C-terminal REC domain and negatively regulate DSF biosynthesis [76,77] (Figure 4). At low cell density, unphosphorylated RpfC conformation facilitates the formation of the RpfC–RpfF complex blocking the enzymatic activity of RpfF and the production of DSF signals. At a higher cell density, RpfF is released and produces DSF signals, which allows the induction of QS regulation [95]. This mechanism demonstrated in Xcc seems also to be present in X. fastidiosa.

 

2.2.2. Turnover of DSF Signals

In Xcc and Xoo, DSF signals accumulate in the early stationary phase, and their levels decline rapidly afterwards, suggesting the existence of a DSF signal turnover system [

99

]. Studies of RpfB in both Xcc and

X. fastidiosa

have shown that RpfB is involved in DSF processing, as DSF-like fatty acid profiles whose production depends on RpfF are affected in

rpfB

mutants [

78

]. In addition,

rpfB

mutants boost DSF production during growth, while the overproduction of RpfB abolishes the DSF signal [

94

]. A reduction in insect colonization and transmission was observed, but not a reduction in plant colonization. A biochemical analysis performed in vitro suggested fatty acyl-CoA ligase activity for RpfB, but, surprisingly, its effects on the DSF and BDSF signals was limited, indicating that RpfB plays a more important role in pathogenesis by counteracting RpfF thioesterase activity [

100

]. Discrepancies in RpfB enzymatic activities measured in vitro and in vivo suggest the involvement of an additional factor.

The expression of

rpfB

is negatively regulated by RpfC, RpfG, and Clp, which directly bind to the

rpfB

promoter region when it is complexed with di-GMP-cyclic [

101

] (

Figure 4

). At a low cell density, the di-GMP-cyclic-Clp complex represses

rpfB

expression, whereas at a high cell density, di-GMP-cyclic is degraded by RpfG, and

rpfB

is expressed. Finally, the RpfB-dependent signal turnover system was also detected in several

Xanthomonas spp.

including Xoo, but discrepancies were observed in bacterial virulence-associated traits [

94

].

 

 

References

  1. Eberhard, A.; Burlingame, A.L.; Kenyon, G.L.; Nealson, K.H.; Oppenheimer, N.J. Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 2444–2449, doi:10.1021/bi00512a013.
  2. Cao, J.G.; Meighen, E. Purification and structural identification of an autoinducer for the luminescence system of Vibrio har-veyi. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 21670–21676, doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(20)88238-6.
  3. Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing signal–response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 14, 576–588, doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89.
  4. Bainton, N.J.; Stead, P.; Chhabra, S.R.; Bycroft, B.W.; Salmond, G.P.C.; Stewart, G.S.A.B.; Williams, P. N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone regulates carbapenem antibiotic production in Erwinia carotovora. Biochem. J. 1992, 288, 997–1004, doi:10.1042/bj2880997.
  5. Williams, P. Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signaling in the bacterial world. Microbiology 2007, 153, 3923–3938, doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/012856-0.
  6. Von Bodman, S.B.; Bauer, W.D.; Coplin, D.L. Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003, 41, 455–482, doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095652.
  7. Deng, Y.; Wu, J.; Tao, F.; Zhang, L.-H. Listening to a new language: DSF-based quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 160–173, doi:10.1021/cr100354f.
  8. Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.-H.; Cámara, M.; He, Y. The DSF family of quorum sensing signals: Diversity, biosynthesis, and turno-ver. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 293–303, doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.013.
  9. Almeida, R.P.P.; Killiny, N.; Newman, K.L.; Chatterjee, S.; Ionescu, M.; Lindow, S.E. Contribution of RpfB to cell-to-cell sig-nal synthesis, virulence, and vector transmission of Xylella fastidiosa. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 453–462, doi:10.1094/mpmi-03-11-0074.
  10. Ionescu, M.; Yokota, K.; Antonova, E.; Garcia, A.; Beaulieu, E.; Hayes, T.; Iavarone, A.T.; Lindow, S.E. Promiscuous diffusible signal factor production and responsiveness of the Xylella fastidiosa Rpf system. mBio 2016, 7, e01054–16, doi:10.1128/mbio.01054-16.
  11. Quiñones, B.; Pujol, C.J.; Lindow, S.E. Regulation of AHL production and its contribution to epiphytic fitness in Pseudomonas syringae. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 521–531, doi:10.1094/mpmi.2004.17.5.521.
  12. Quiñones, B.; Dulla, G.; Lindow, S.E. Quorum sensing regulates exopolysaccharide production, motility, and virulence in Pseudomonas syringae. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 682–693, doi:10.1094/mpmi-18-0682.
  13. Cheng, F.; Ma, A.; Zhuang, X.; He, X.; Zhuang, G. N-(3-oxo-hexanoyl)-homoserine lactone has a critical contribution to the quorum-sensing-dependent regulation in phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 11528. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw265, doi:10.1093/femsle/fnw265.
  14. Cheng, F.; Ma, A.; Luo, J.; Zhuang, X.; Zhuang, G. N-acylhomoserine lactone-regulation of genes mediating motility and pathogenicity in Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tabaci 11528. Microbiology Open 2017, 6, e00440, doi:10.1002/mbo3.440.
  15. Patel, H.K.; Ferrante, P.; Covaceuszach, S.; Lamba, D.; Scortichini, M.; Venturi, V. The kiwifruit emerging pathogen Pseudo-monas syringae pv. actinidiae does not produce AHLs but possesses three LuxR solos. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87862, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087862.
  16. Cellini, A.; Donati, I.; Fiorentini, L.; Vandelle, E.; Polverari, A.; Venturi, V.; Buriani, G.; Vanneste, J.L.; Spinelli, F. N-acyl homoserine lactones and LuxR solos regulate social behaviour and virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Microb. Ecol. 2020, 79, 383–396, doi:10.1007/s00248-019-01416-5.
  17. Flavier, A.B.; Ganova-Raeva, L.M.; Schell, M.; Denny, T.P. Hierarchical autoinduction in Ralstonia solanacearum: Control of acyl-homoserine lactone production by a novel autoregulatory system responsive to 3-hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 7089–7097, doi:10.1128/jb.179.22.7089-7097.1997.
  18. Chen, C.-N.; Chen, C.-J.; Liao, C.-T.; Lee, C.-Y. A probable aculeacin A acylase from the Ralstonia solanacearum GMI1000 is N-acyl-homoserine lactone acylase with quorum-quenching activity. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 89, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-89.
  19. Burke, A.K.; Duong, D.A.; Jensen, R.V.; Stevens, A.M. Analyzing the transcriptomes of two quorum-sensing controlled tran-scription factors, RcsA and LrhA, important for Pantoea stewartii virulence. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145358, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145358.
  20. Lang, J.; Faure, D. Functions and regulation of quorum-sensing in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 14, doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00014.
  21. Zhang, L.; Murphy, P.J.; Kerr, A.; Tate, M.E. Agrobacterium conjugation and gene regulation by N-acyl-L-homoserine lac-tones. Nat. Cell Biol. 1993, 362, 446–448, doi:10.1038/362446a0.
  22. Cho, H.; Winans, S.C. TraA, TraC and TraD autorepress two divergent quorum-regulated promoters near the transfer origin of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1769–1782, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05624.x.
  23. Su, S.; Khan, S.R.; Farrand, S.K. Induction and loss of Ti plasmid conjugative competence in response to the acyl-homoserine lactone quorum-sensing signal. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 4398–4407, doi:10.1128/jb.01684-07.
  24. Li, P.L.; Everhart, D.M.; Farrand, S.K. Genetic and sequence analysis of the pTiC58 Trb locus, encoding a mating-pair for-mation system related to members of the type IV secretion family. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 6164–6172.
  25. Hwang, I.; Li, P.L.; Zhang, L.; Piper, K.R.; Cook, D.M.; Tate, M.E.; Farrand, S.K. TraI, a LuxI homologue, is responsible for production of conjugation factor, the Ti plasmid N-acylhomoserine lactone autoinducer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 4639–4643, doi:10.1073/pnas.91.11.4639.
  26. Piqué, N.; Miñana-Galbis, D.; Merino, S.; Tomás, J.M. Virulence factors of Erwinia amylovora: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 12836–12854, doi:10.3390/ijms160612836.
  27. Venturi, V.; Venuti, C.; Devescovi, G.; Lucchese, C.; Friscina, A.; Degrassi, G.; Aguilar, C.; Mazzucchi, U. The plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora produces acyl-homoserine lactone signal molecules in vitro and in planta. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 241, 179–183, doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.10.015.
  28. Molina, L.; Rezzonico, F.; Défago, G.; Duffy, B. Autoinduction in Erwinia amylovora: evidence of an acyl-homoserine lactone signal in the fire blight pathogen. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3206–3213, doi:10.1128/jb.187.9.3206-3213.2005.
  29. Mohammadi, M.; Geider, K. Autoinducer-2 of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora and other plant-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 266, 34–41, doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00510.x .
  30. Rezzonico, F.; Duffy, B. The role of LuxS in the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora is limited to metabolism and does not involve quorum sensing. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions 2007, 20, 1284–1297, doi:10.1094/mpmi-20-10-1284.
  31. Nasser, W.; Bouillant, M.L.; Salmond, G.; Reverchon, S. Characterization of the Erwinia chrysanthemi expI–expR locus direct-ing the synthesis of two N‐acyl‐homoserine lactone signal molecules. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 29, 1391–1405, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01022.x.
  32. Castang, S.; Reverchon, S.; Gouet, P.; Nasser, W. Direct evidence for the modulation of the activity of the Erwinia chrysanthe-mi quorum-sensing regulator ExpR by acylhomoserine lactone pheromone. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 29972–29987, doi:10.1074/jbc.m601666200.
  33. Reverchon, S.; Bouillant, M.L.; Salmond, G.; Nasser, W. Integration of the quorum‐sensing system in the regulatory net-works controlling virulence factor synthesis in Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 29, 1407–1418, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01023.x.
  34. Hussain, M.B.B.M.; Zhang, H.-B.; Xu, J.-L.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L.-H. The acyl-homoserine lactone-type quorum-sensing system modulates cell motility and virulence of Erwinia chrysanthemi pv. zeae. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 190, 1045–1053, doi:10.1128/jb.01472-07.
  35. Potrykus, M.; Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N.; Lojkowska, E. Interplay of classic Exp and specific Vfm quorum sensing systems on the phenotypic features of Dickeya solani strains exhibiting different virulence levels. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 19, 1238–1251, doi:10.1111/mpp.12614.
  36. Zhang, R.-G.; Pappas, K.M.; Brace, J.L.; Miller, P.C.; Oulmassov, T.; Molyneaux, J.M.; Anderson, J.C.; Bashkin, J.K.; Winans, S.C.; Joachimiak, A. Structure of a bacterial quorum-sensing transcription factor complexed with pheromone and DNA. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 417, 971–974, doi:10.1038/nature00833.
  37. Cui, Y.; Chatterjee, A.; Hasegawa, H.; Dixit, V.; Leigh, N.; Chatterjee, A.K. ExpR, a LuxR homolog of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora, activates transcription of rsmA, which specifies a global regulatory RNA-binding protein. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 4792–4803, doi:10.1128/jb.187.14.4792-4803.2005.
  38. Põllumaa, L.; Alamäe, T.; Mäe, A. Quorum sensing and expression of virulence in Pectobacteria. Sensors 2012, 12, 3327–3349, doi:10.3390/s120303327.
  39. McGowan, S.; Sebaihia, M.; Jones, S.; Yu, B.; Bainton, N.; Chan, P.F.; Bycroft, B.; Stewart, G.; Williams, P.; Salmond, G.P.C. Carbapenem antibiotic production in Erwinia carotovora is regulated by CarR, a homologue of the LuxR transcriptional acti-vator. Microbiology 1995, 141, 541–550, doi:10.1099/13500872-141-3-541.
  40. Jones, S.; Yu, B.; Bainton, N.; Birdsall, M.; Bycroft, B.; Chhabra, S.; Cox, A.; Golby, P.; Reeves, P.; Stephens, S. The lux autoin-ducer regulates the production of exoenzyme virulence determinants in Erwinia carotovora and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EM-BO J. 1993, 12, 2477–2482, doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05902.x.
  41. Liu, H.; Coulthurst, S.J.; Salmond, G.P.C.; Toth, I.K.; Pritchard, L.; Hedley, P.E.; Ravensdale, M.; Humphris, S.; Burr, T.; Takle, G.; et al. Quorum sensing coordinates brute force and stealth modes of infection in the plant pathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000093, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000093.
  42. Patel, H.K.; Suarezmoreno, Z.R.; Degrassi, G.; Subramoni, S.; Gonzalez, J.F.; Venturi, V. Bacterial LuxR solos have evolved to respond to different molecules including signals from plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 447, doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00447.
  43. Von Bodman, S.B.; Majerczak, D.R.; Coplin, D.L. A negative regulator mediates quorum-sensing control of exopolysaccha-ride production in Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7687–7692, doi:10.1073/pnas.95.13.7687.
  44. Zhou, L.; Yu, Y.; Chen, X.; Diab, A.A.; Ruan, L.; He, J.; Wang, H.; He, Y. The multiple DSF-family QS signals are synthesized from carbohydrate and branched-chain amino acids via the FAS elongation cycle. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, srep13294, doi:10.1038/srep13294.
  45. Deng, Y.; Wu, J.; Yin, W.; Li, P.; Zhou, J.; Chen, S.; He, F.; Cai, J.; Zhang, L.-H. Diffusible signal factor family signals provide a fitness advantage to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in interspecies competition. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1534–1545, doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13244.
  46. Slater, H.; Alvarez-Morales, A.; Barber, C.E.; Daniels, M.J.; Dow, M. A two-component system involving an HD-GYP do-main protein links cell-cell signalling to pathogenicity gene expression in Xanthomonas campestris. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 38, 986–1003, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02196.x.
  47. Torres, P.S.; Malamud, F.; Rigano, L.A.; Russo, D.M.; Marano, M.R.; Castagnaro, A.P.; Zorreguieta, A.; Bouarab, K.; Dow, M.; A. Vojnov, A. Controlled synthesis of the DSF cell-cell signal is required for biofilm formation and virulence in Xanthomo-nas campestris. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2101–2109, doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01332.x.
  48. Andrade, M.O.; Alegria, M.C.; Guzzo, C.R.; Docena, C.; Rosa, M.C.P.; Ramos, C.H.I.; Farah, C.S. The HD-GYP domain of RpfG mediates a direct linkage between the Rpf quorum-sensing pathway and a subset of diguanylate cyclase proteins in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv citri. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 537–551, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05386.x.
  49. Zhou, L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Sun, S.; Yang, L.-C.; Jiang, B.-L.; He, Y. Identification and characterization of naturally occurring DSF-family quorum sensing signal turnover system in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 4646–4658, doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12999.
  50. An, S.-Q.; Potnis, N.; Dow, M.; Vorhölter, F.-J.; He, Y.-Q.; Becker, A.; Teper, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, N.; Bleris, L.; et al. Mechanistic insights into host adaptation, virulence and epidemiology of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 44, 1–32, doi:10.1093/femsre/fuz024.
  51. Timilsina, S.; Potnis, N.; Newberry, E.A.; Liyanapathiranage, P.; Iruegas-Bocardo, F.; White, F.F.; Goss, E.M.; Jones, J.B. Xan-thomonas diversity, virulence and plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 18, 415–427, doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0361-8.
  52. He, Y.; Xu, M.; Lin, K.; Ng, Y.-J.A.; Wen, C.-M.; Wang, L.-H.; Liu, Z.-D.; Zhang, H.-B.; Dong, Y.-H.; Dow, J.M.; et al. Genome scale analysis of diffusible signal factor regulon in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris: Identification of novel cell-cell communication-dependent genes and functions. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 59, 610–622, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04961.x.
  53. Gudesblat, G.E.; Torres, P.S.; Vojnov, A. Xanthomonas campestris overcomes Arabidopsis stomatal innate immunity through a DSF cell-to-cell signal-regulated virulence factor. Plant Physiol. 2008, 149, 1017–1027, doi:10.1104/pp.108.126870.
  54. Kakkar, A.; Nizampatnam, N.R.; Kondreddy, A.; Pradhan, B.B.; Chatterjee, S. Xanthomonas campestris cell-cell signalling molecule DSF (diffusible signal factor) elicits innate immunity in plants and is suppressed by the exopolysaccharide xan-than. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6697–6714, doi:10.1093/jxb/erv377.
  55. He, Y.-W.; Wu, J.; Cha, J.-S.; Zhang, L.-H. Rice bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae produces multiple DSF-family signals in regulation of virulence factor production. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 187, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-187.
  56. Thowthampitak, J.; Shaffer, B.T.; Prathuangwong, S.; Loper, J.E. Role of RpfF in virulence and exoenzyme production of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines, the causal agent of bacterial pustule of soybean. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 1252–1260, doi:10.1094/phyto-98-12-1252.
  57. Roper, M.C.; Castro, C.; Ingel, B. Xylella fastidiosa: Bacterial parasitism with hallmarks of commensalism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 140–147, doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2019.05.005.
  58. Chatterjee, S.; Wistrom, C.; Lindow, S.E. A cell-cell signaling sensor is required for virulence and insect transmission of Xylella fastidiosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2670–2675, doi:10.1073/pnas.0712236105.
  59. Wang, X.; He, S.-W.; Guo, H.-B.; Han, J.-G.; Thin, K.K.; Gao, J.-S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.-X. Dickeya oryzae sp. nov., isolated from the roots of rice. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 4171–4178, doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004265.
  60. Feng, L.; Schaefer, A.L.; Hu, M.; Chen, R.; Greenberg, E.P.; Zhou, J. Virulence factor identification in the banana pathogen Dickeya zeae ms2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, doi:10.1128/aem.01611-19.
  61. Ham, J.H.; Cui, Y.; Alfano, J.R.; Rodríguez-Palenzuela, P.; Rojas, C.M.; Chatterjee, A.K.; Collmer, A. Analysis of Erwinia chrysanthemi EC16 pelE∷uidA, pelL∷uida, and hrpN∷uidA mutants reveals strain-specific atypical regulation of the Hrp type III secretion system. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 184–194, doi:10.1094/mpmi.2004.17.2.184.
  62. Nasser, W.; Dorel, C.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Van Gijsegem, F.; Groleau, M.-C.; Déziel, E.; Reverchon, S. Vfm a new quorum sens-ing system controls the virulence of Dickeya dadantii. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 865–880, doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12049.
  63. Genome-Based Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the “Enterobacteriales”: Proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the Families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov - PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.insb.bib.cnrs.fr/27620848/ (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  64. Von Bodman, S.B.; Ball, J.K.; Faini, M.A.; Herrera, C.M.; Minogue, T.D.; Urbanowski, M.L.; Stevens, A.M. The quorum sens-ing negative regulators EsaR and ExpREcc, homologues within the LuxR family, retain the ability to function as activators of transcription. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 7001–7007, doi:10.1128/jb.185.23.7001-7007.2003.
  65. Dumenyo, C.; Mukherjee, A.; Chun, W.; Chatterjee, A.K. Genetic and physiological evidence for the production of N-acyl homoserine lactones by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and other fluorescent plant pathogenic Pseudomonas species. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1998, 104, 569–582, doi:10.1023/a:1008651300599.
  66. Marutani, M.; Taguchi, F.; Ogawa, Y.; Hossain, M.; Inagaki, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Shiraishi, T.; Ichinose, Y. Gac two-component system in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci is required for virulence but not for hypersensitive reaction. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2007, 279, 313–322, doi:10.1007/s00438-007-0309-y.
  67. Chatterjee, A.; Cui, Y.; Yang, H.; Collmer, A.; Alfano, J.R.; Chatterjee, A.K. GacA, the response regulator of a two-component system, acts as a master regulator in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 by controlling regulatory RNA, transcriptional activators, and alternate sigma factors. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 1106–1117, doi:10.1094/mpmi.2003.16.12.1106.
  68. Sawada, T.; Eguchi, M.; Asaki, S.; Kashiwagi, R.; Shimomura, K.; Taguchi, F.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Noutoshi, Y.; Toyoda, K.; et al. MexEF-OprN multidrug efflux pump transporter negatively controls N-acyl-homoserine lactone accumu-lation in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 6605. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2018, 293, 907–917, doi:10.1007/s00438-018-1430-9.
  69. Piper, K.R.; Von Bodman, S.B.; Farrand, S.K. Conjugation factor of Agrobacterium tumefaciens regulates Ti plasmid transfer by autoinduction. Nat. Cell Biol. 1993, 362, 448–450, doi:10.1038/362448a0.
  70. Hwang, I.; Cook, D.M.; Farrand, S.K. A new regulatory element modulates homoserine lactone-mediated autoinduction of Ti plasmid conjugal transfer. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 449–458, doi:10.1128/jb.177.2.449-458.1995.
  71. Zhu, J.; Winans, S.C. Autoinducer binding by the quorum-sensing regulator TraR increases affinity for target promoters in vitro and decreases TraR turnover rates in whole cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4832–4837, doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.4832.
  72. Diel, B.; Dequivre, M.; Wisniewski‐Dyé, F.; Vial, L.; Hommais, F. A novel plasmid‐transcribed regulatory sRNA, QfsR, con-trols chromosomal polycistronic gene expression in Agrobacterium fabrum. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3063–3075, doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14704.
  73. Shepherd, R.W.; Lindow, S.E. Two dissimilar N-acyl-homoserine lactone acylases of Pseudomonas syringae influence colony and biofilm morphology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 75, 45–53, doi:10.1128/aem.01723-08.
  74. Haudecoeur, E.; Tannières, M.; Cirou, A.; Raffoux, A.; Dessaux, Y.; Faure, D. Different regulation and roles of lactonases AiiB and AttM in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2009, 22, 529–537, doi:10.1094/mpmi-22-5-0529.
  75. Costa, E.D.; Chai, Y.; Winans, S.C. The quorum-sensing protein TraR of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is susceptible to intrinsic and TraM-mediated proteolytic instability. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 84, 807–815, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08037.x.
  76. Deng, Y.; Wu, J.; Tao, F.; Zhang, L.-H. Listening to a new language: DSF-based quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 160–173, doi:10.1021/cr100354f.
  77. Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.-H.; Cámara, M.; He, Y. The DSF family of quorum sensing signals: Diversity, biosynthesis, and turno-ver. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 293–303, doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.013.
  78. Almeida, R.P.P.; Killiny, N.; Newman, K.L.; Chatterjee, S.; Ionescu, M.; Lindow, S.E. Contribution of RpfB to cell-to-cell sig-nal synthesis, virulence, and vector transmission of Xylella fastidiosa. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 453–462, doi:10.1094/mpmi-03-11-0074.
  79. Ionescu, M.; Yokota, K.; Antonova, E.; Garcia, A.; Beaulieu, E.; Hayes, T.; Iavarone, A.T.; Lindow, S.E. Promiscuous diffusible signal factor production and responsiveness of the Xylella fastidiosa Rpf system. mBio 2016, 7, e01054–16, doi:10.1128/mbio.01054-16.
  80. Slater, H.; Alvarez-Morales, A.; Barber, C.E.; Daniels, M.J.; Dow, M. A two-component system involving an HD-GYP do-main protein links cell-cell signalling to pathogenicity gene expression in Xanthomonas campestris. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 38, 986–1003, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02196.x.
  81. An, S.-Q.; Potnis, N.; Dow, M.; Vorhölter, F.-J.; He, Y.-Q.; Becker, A.; Teper, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, N.; Bleris, L.; et al. Mechanistic insights into host adaptation, virulence and epidemiology of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 44, 1–32, doi:10.1093/femsre/fuz024.
  82. Timilsina, S.; Potnis, N.; Newberry, E.A.; Liyanapathiranage, P.; Iruegas-Bocardo, F.; White, F.F.; Goss, E.M.; Jones, J.B. Xan-thomonas diversity, virulence and plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 18, 415–427, doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0361-8.
  83. He, Y.; Xu, M.; Lin, K.; Ng, Y.-J.A.; Wen, C.-M.; Wang, L.-H.; Liu, Z.-D.; Zhang, H.-B.; Dong, Y.-H.; Dow, J.M.; et al. Genome scale analysis of diffusible signal factor regulon in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris: Identification of novel cell-cell communication-dependent genes and functions. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 59, 610–622, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04961.x.
  84. Gudesblat, G.E.; Torres, P.S.; Vojnov, A. Xanthomonas campestris overcomes Arabidopsis stomatal innate immunity through a DSF cell-to-cell signal-regulated virulence factor. Plant Physiol. 2008, 149, 1017–1027, doi:10.1104/pp.108.126870.
  85. Kakkar, A.; Nizampatnam, N.R.; Kondreddy, A.; Pradhan, B.B.; Chatterjee, S. Xanthomonas campestris cell-cell signalling molecule DSF (diffusible signal factor) elicits innate immunity in plants and is suppressed by the exopolysaccharide xan-than. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6697–6714, doi:10.1093/jxb/erv377.
  86. He, Y.-W.; Wu, J.; Cha, J.-S.; Zhang, L.-H. Rice bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae produces multiple DSF-family signals in regulation of virulence factor production. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 187, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-187.
  87. Thowthampitak, J.; Shaffer, B.T.; Prathuangwong, S.; Loper, J.E. Role of RpfF in virulence and exoenzyme production of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines, the causal agent of bacterial pustule of soybean. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 1252–1260, doi:10.1094/phyto-98-12-1252.
  88. Roper, M.C.; Castro, C.; Ingel, B. Xylella fastidiosa: Bacterial parasitism with hallmarks of commensalism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 140–147, doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2019.05.005.
  89. Chatterjee, S.; Wistrom, C.; Lindow, S.E. A cell-cell signaling sensor is required for virulence and insect transmission of Xylella fastidiosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2670–2675, doi:10.1073/pnas.0712236105.
  90. Zhou, L.; Yu, Y.; Chen, X.; Diab, A.A.; Ruan, L.; He, J.; Wang, H.; He, Y. The multiple DSF-family QS signals are synthesized from carbohydrate and branched-chain amino acids via the FAS elongation cycle. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, srep13294, doi:10.1038/srep13294.
  91. Deng, Y.; Wu, J.; Yin, W.; Li, P.; Zhou, J.; Chen, S.; He, F.; Cai, J.; Zhang, L.-H. Diffusible signal factor family signals provide a fitness advantage to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in interspecies competition. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1534–1545, doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13244.
  92. Torres, P.S.; Malamud, F.; Rigano, L.A.; Russo, D.M.; Marano, M.R.; Castagnaro, A.P.; Zorreguieta, A.; Bouarab, K.; Dow, M.; A. Vojnov, A. Controlled synthesis of the DSF cell-cell signal is required for biofilm formation and virulence in Xanthomo-nas campestris. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2101–2109, doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01332.x.
  93. Andrade, M.O.; Alegria, M.C.; Guzzo, C.R.; Docena, C.; Rosa, M.C.P.; Ramos, C.H.I.; Farah, C.S. The HD-GYP domain of RpfG mediates a direct linkage between the Rpf quorum-sensing pathway and a subset of diguanylate cyclase proteins in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv citri. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 537–551, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05386.x.
  94. Zhou, L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Sun, S.; Yang, L.-C.; Jiang, B.-L.; He, Y. Identification and characterization of naturally occurring DSF-family quorum sensing signal turnover system in the phytopathogen Xanthomonas. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 4646–4658, doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12999.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback