Organizational Health Literacy: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Karina Chen and Version 4 by Karina Chen.

The term organizational health literacy (OHL) is a new concept that emerged to address the challenge of predominantly in patients with limited health literacy (HL). 

  • Organization health literacy
  • health literacy
  • health outcome
  • Public health

1. Development of organizational health literacy[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]

In the late modern “health” and “multi-option” communities, health literacy is a specific skill that is needed to successfully deal with a large number of health relevant-tasks and decisions to be taken every day[[1][2].

The concept of health literacy (HL) is used in the United States (mainly in medical centers) to study the effectiveness of HL on treatment outcome, especially in patients with insufficient and inadequate HL severity [2][3]. In this framework, there is evidence that HL must be regarded as a context or relationship strategy related to personal HL, but the needs of the organization for users must also be considered [4][5]. The concept of HL not only led to methods for estimating personal HL, but also to the estimation of the organization’s HL sensitivity[6][7]. Several health strategies are designed to improve health behavior, self-care abilities, and the quality of life, but adherence and participation are related to social health determinants [8][9]. A large study showed that HL was a main modifying factor for health outcomes because it is associated with social health determinants [10][11]. Although organizational initiatives responding to HL may be a practical approach to improve healthcare systems and health-promoting hospitals, using experiences from the quality movement in these systems remains less responsive than needed to the concept of limited HL [12][13]. Unintentional non-adherence to medications and treatments; lack of involvement of patients in decision making; difficulties with patients- provider communication, discharge instructions and informed consent; and increasing rates of hospitalizations, readmissions, and emergency care have been reported for patients with limited HL [14][15].

There is now a growing recognition that HL depends not only on individual skills and abilities but also on the demands and complexities of the health-care system [9][10]. One way to raise almost all low levels of HL in populations is to build health-literate systems of care. The term organizational health literacy (OHL) is a relatively new concept that emerged to address the challenge of most in patients with limited HL [9]. It describes a health care organization that uses strategies to make it easier for patients to engage in the health care process, navigate the health care system, understand health information, and manage their health [16][17][18]. Thus, healthcare quality could be improved and patients’ may be better met if healthcare organizations transformed into HL responsive ones delivering care in a way that protects HL skills and practices [9][10] .

With a prima facie evidence, there has been a steady rise in designs and structures of OHL in the recent years [6,14], for example, the ten attributes of an OHL were defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Health Literacy Roundtable, which is a first systematic attempt to implement the HL concept in health literate health care organizations. The attributes of OHL provide a guide to altering health care organizations to “make it easier for people to navigate, understand, and use information and services to take care of their health” [1][19][20]. These ten attributes focus on delivering health information, staff training in health communication, address HL with specific leadership activities and assess the quality of the organization’s environment for patients with different levels of HL. According to these attributes, an OHL: 1) has leadership that makes HL integral to its mission, structure, and operations; 2) integrates HL into planning, evaluation measures, patient safety and quality improvement; 3) prepare the workforce to be health literate and monitors progress; 4) include populations served in the design, implementation, and evaluation of health information and services; 5) meet the needs of people with various HL skills while avoiding stigmatization; 6) use HL strategies in interpersonal communication and confirm the understanding of all points of contact; 7) provide easy access to health information and services and navigation assistance; 8) design and distributes print, audiovisual, and social media content that is easy to understand and act on; 9) addresses health literacy in high-risk situations, including care transitions and communications about medicines; and 10) communicates clearly what health plans cover and what individuals will have to pay for services [21][22]. Likewise, a series of HL guides and operational frameworks have been developed in the past few years to help organizations with their transition to OHL [19][20].

2. Barriers and Facilitators of OHL

The research identified lack of knowledge or training about HL, poor organizational commitment to HL, ambiguity of roles between health providers and clinic staff, poor interactive and linguistic skills, not having policies, and procedures, protocols supporting HL practice as the most common barriers for sustainability and integration of OHL [23][24][25][26]. The research in this review shows that dealing with these barriers, patients do not have the appropriate abilities and skills to cope with the health system, and therefore have a negative impact on the appropriateness and quality of health care [27][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31]. Despite HL is acknowledged as a key determinant of quality improvement in the health care system and the enhancement of OHL is considered as the main ingredient in the health instruction for the transition from care to well-being, it seems that the organizational sensitivity and commitment to HL issues is still poor because HL is not included in the corporate identity of health organizations and their strategic programs and planning [32].

It seems that the transition to a healthcare organization with comprehensive health knowledge is still ongoing. This can be a complicated process and takes many years. Most healthcare organizations require radical, simultaneous, and multiple changes to transform into a health-literate organization [33]. In particular, healthcare organizations with poor commitment and leadership to HL, therefore, their efforts to improve OHL through agreements, policies, and health education interventions are insufficient[34]. Due to the lack of knowledge and training about HL and its effects on the sustainability of the health system and health outcomes, HL is not usually integrated into organizations’ vision and strategic planning [35][36]. If there is no commitment and support to improve the role of HL and communication, staff and health service providers may not be able to implement HL’s practices and skills due to a lack of familiarity with the concept of HL. Key factors may promote the transition to a comprehensive health-literate healthcare organization, including ownership of changes, subcultural diversity within healthcare organizations and systems, and supporting external stakeholders, leadership, and professional allegiance [35][36].

3. Conclusions

OHL is emerged to help improve patient’s engagement in the health care process, the navigation system of healthcare, and communication tools and skills. To support this task, several operational tools and frameworks have been (and continue to be) developed and provide best practices and recommendations to implement HL issues in the healthcare organizations. Our findings indicated the fact that all HL tools and frameworks included in this review are overwhelmingly positive because these tools, particularly AHRQ, VHLO, and HLHO-10, provide best practices and evidence-based recommendations to enhance the capacities of healthcare organizations.

It seems that shifting to effective health-literate healthcare organizations may be a complicated process, and health care reform must consider broader health determinants. Based on this, the authors argue that a healthcare system level effort is needed a systemic approach to enhance communication practices and standards, verbal/written communication skills, and patient knowledge and engagement, and that there is a need for the healthcare system to consider HL as an organizational priority, that is, be responsive. This approach will likely improve the healthcare system’s strategy, vision, human resource management, mission, and operation.

References

  1. Simonds, S.K. Health Education as Social Policy. Heal. Educ. Monogr. 1974, 2, 1–10, doi:10.1177/10901981740020s102.
  2. Nutbeam, D. Advancing health literacy: A global challenge for the 21st century. Health Promot. Int. 2000, 15, 183–184, doi:10.1093/heapro/15.3.183.
  3. Nutbeam, D. Health Promotion Glossary. Heal. Promot. Int. 1998, 13, 349–364, doi:10.1093/heapro/13.4.349.
  4. Zarezadeh, Y.; Eskandari, N.; Moradi, M.; Abdi, N. The Relationship between Health Literacy and Quality of Life of Employees in Campus of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. J. Health Lit. 2020, 4, 38–45.
  5. Zareipour, M.; Sadaghianifar, A.; Moradi, Z.; Jafari, N; Esmzadeh, M. Health Literacy and Its Relationship with Self-Efficacy in Health Ambassadors. J. Health Lit. 2020, 4, 56–63.
  6. Parker, R.M.; Ratzan, S.C.; Lurie, N. Health Literacy: A Policy Challenge for Advancing High-Quality Health Care. Heal. Aff. 2003, 22, 147–153, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.147.
  7. Khorasani, E.C.; Sany, S.B.T.; Orooji, A.; Ferns, G.; Peyman, N. Health Literacy in Iranian Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran. J. Public Health 2020, doi:10.18502/ijph.v49i5.3203.
  8. Samadbeik, M.; Saremian, M.; Sohrabizadeh, M.; Birjandi, M.; Garavand, S. Evaluation of E-health literacy in Paramedicine and Health Nutrition students of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. J. Health Lit. 2020, 5, 12–22.
  9. Hayran, O.; Omer, A. and Orhan, Ö. Assessment of Organizational Health Literacy in a Group of Public, Private and University Hospitals in Istanbul. J. Health Syst. Policies 2019, 1, 47–59.
  10. Ghasemi, H. and Rasekh, N. Identifying Dimensions of Communication Literacy: Thematic Analysis Approach. J. Health Lit. 2020, 4, 18–29.
  11. Alizadeh-Siuki, H.; Peyman, N.; Vahedian-Shahroodi, M.; Gholian-Aval, M.; Tehrani, H. Health Education Intervention on HIV/AIDS Prevention Behaviors among Health Volunteers in Healthcare Centers: An Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 2018, 45, 582–588, doi:10.1080/01488376.2018.1481177.
  12. Eshghizadeh, M.; Delshad, N.A.; Akbari, S.; Majidi F.; Khalili, F. Relationship between health literacy and lifestyle in patients at risk and with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Health Lit. 2020, 5, 61–68.
  13. Organization, W.H. and R.O.F. Europe, What is the Evidence on the Methods Frameworks and Indicators Used to Evaluate Health Literacy Policies Programmes and Interventions at the Regional National and Organizational Levels? World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019, Volume 65.
  14. Parker, R.M.; Wolf, M.S.; Kirsch, I. Preparing for an Epidemic of Limited Health Literacy: Weathering the Perfect Storm. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008, 23, 1273–1276, doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0621-1.
  15. Peyvand, M.; Kargar, S. and Hajizade, F. The Role of Health Literacy Promotion in Epidemic Control Corona 19. J. Health Lit. 2020. 5, 9–11.
  16. Cindy Cindy Brach, Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality the Journey to Become a Health Literate Organization: A Snapshot of Health System Improvement. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2017, 240, 203–237.
  17. Hernandez, L.M. How Can Health Care Organizations Become More Health Literate? In Workshop Summary; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, WA, USA, 2012.
  18. Vamos, C.A.; Thompson, E.L.; Griner, S.B.; Liggett, L.G.; Daley, E.M. Applying Organizational Health Literacy to Maternal and Child Health. Matern. Child. Health J. 2019, 23, 597–602, doi:10.1007/s10995-018-2687-7.
  19. Charoghchian, K.; Peyman, E.N.; Esmaily, H. Relations between breastfeeding self-efficacy and maternal health literacy among pregnant women. Evidence Based Care 2017. 6, 18–25.
  20. Baker, D.W. The meaning and the measure of health literacy. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2006, 21, 878–883, doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00540.x.
  21. Adsul, P.; Wray, R.; Gautam, K.; Jupka, K.; Weaver, N.L.; Wilson, K. Becoming a health literate organization: Formative research results from healthcare organizations providing care for undeserved communities. Health Serv. Manag. Res. 2017, 30, 188–196, doi:10.1177/0951484817727130.
  22. Brach, C.; Hernandez, K.D.; Baur, L.M.; Parker, C.; Dreyer, R.; Schyve, B.; Lemerise, P.A.J.; Schillinger, D. Ten Attributes of Health Literate Health Care Organisations, Institute of Medicine; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, WA, USA, 2012.
  23. Ernstmann, N.; Halbach, S.; Kowalski, C.; Pfaff, H.; Ansmann, L. Measuring attributes of health literate health care organizations from the patients’ perspective: Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess health literacy-sensitive communication (HL-COM). Z. Für EvidenzFortbild. Und Qual. Im Gesundh. 2017, 121, 58–63, doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2016.12.008.
  24. Kowalski, C.; Lee, S.-Y.D.; Schmidt, A.; Wesselmann, S.; A.; Wirtz, M.; Pfaff, H.; Ernstmann, N. The health literate health care organization 10 item questionnaire (HLHO-10): Development and validation. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15, 47, doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0707-5.
  25. Prince, L.Y.; Schmidtke, C.; Beck, J.K.; Hadden, K.B. An Assessment of Organizational Health Literacy Practices at an Academic Health Center. Qual. Manag. Health Care 2018, 27, 93–97, doi:10.1097/qmh.0000000000000162.
  26. Wynia, M.K.; Osborn, C.Y. Health Literacy and Communication Quality in Health Care Organizations. J. Health Commun. 2010, 15, 102–115, doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.499981.
  27. Rudd, R.E. and Anderson, J.E. The Health Literacy Environment of Hospitals and Health Centers. Partners for Action: Making Your Healthcare Facility Literacy-Friendly; National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Boston, 2006.
  28. Palumbo, R. and Annarumma, C. The importance of being health literate: An organizational health literacy approach. In Proceedings of the 17th Toulon-Verona International Conference, Liverpool, UK, August 28-29, 2014.
  29. Groene, R.O.; E.; Rudd, R. Results of a feasibility study to assess the health literacy environment: Navigation, written, and oral communication in 10 hospitals in Catalonia, Spain. J. Commun. Health 2011, 4, 227–237, doi:10.1179/1753807611y.0000000005.
  30. Annarumma, C.; Palumbo, R.; Cavallone, M. Who empowers whom? The role of organizational health literacy in empowering patients. Sinergie Ital. J. Manag. 2018, 11–27, doi:10.7433/s104.2017.01.
  31. Trezona, A.; Dodson, S.; Osborne, R.H. Development of the Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness (Org-HLR) self-assessment tool and process. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 694, doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3499-6.
  32. Annarumma, C.; Palumbo, R.; Cavallone, M. Who empowers whom? The role of organizational health literacy in empowering patients. Sinergie Ital. J. Manag. 2017, 35, 11–27.
  33. Pelikan, J. From the Health Literacy Survey Europe (HLS-EU) to Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy (M-POHL). Eur. J. Public Health 2018, 28, 265.
  34. Annarumma, C.; Palumbo, R.; Cavallone, M. Who empowers whom? The role of organizational health literacy in empowering patients. Sinergie Ital. J. Manag. 2017, 35, 11–27.
  35. Dietscher, C.; Pelikan, J.; Bobek, J.; Nowak, P. The Action Network on Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy (M-POHL): A network under the umbrella of the WHO European Health Information Initiative (EHII). Public Health Panor. 2019, 5, 65–71.
  36. Bau, I.; Logan, R.A.; Dezii, C.; Rosof, B.; Fernandez, A.; Paasche-Orlow, M.K.; Wong, W.W. Patient-Centered, Integrated Health Care Quality Measures Could Improve Health Literacy, Language Access, and Cultural Competence. NAM Perspect. 2019, doi:10.31478/201902a.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback