Extracellular Vesicles in ILDs: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between versions V1 by Tanyalak Parimon and V2 by Bruce Ren.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are chronic irreversible pulmonary conditions with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic approaches to ILDs are complex and multifactorial. Effective therapeutic interventions are continuously investigated and explored with substantial progress, thanks to advances in basic understanding and translational efforts. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer a new paradigm in diagnosis and treatment.

  • : extracellular vesicles
  • exosomes
  • pathogenesis

Note: The following contents are extract from your paper. The entry will be online only after author check and submit it.

1. Introduction

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a wide spectrum of diffuse parenchymal pulmonary conditions indicated by inflammatory changes in the alveoli. ILDs may present either idiopathically or by a sequela to preexisting comorbidities such as connective tissue, autoimmune diseases, or secondary to biological, chemical, or fine particle exposure [1][2][1,2]. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) designated the term idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) for ILDs of unknown etiologies [3]. IIPs are further subdivided as major, rare, and unclassified IIP [4][5][6][4,5,6]. The natural course of ILDs is characterized by chronic, progressive, and irreversible fibrosis with significant morbidity and mortality [6][7][8][9][6,7,8,9]. While the management of non-idiopathic ILDs relies on addressing the underlying cause of disease, the standard treatment approaches for IIP include antifibrotic therapy or lung transplantation [10][11][12][13][14][10,11,12,13,14]. Although current treatments provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits [15], they are not curative. Extensive research in the pathogenesis of lung fibroproliferation has opened new avenues of therapeutic intervention. ILDs continue to levy significant burdens on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure worldwide [16][17][18][19][16,17,18,19]. Further understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms is essential for more effective antifibrotic treatment approaches. A new and promising avenue of investigation relates to the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in parenchymal lung injury and interstitial fibrosis. The role of EVs in the pathogenesis of nonmalignant chronic respiratory conditions has been extensively described in ILDs [20][21][22][20,21,22], asthma [23][24][23,24], chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) [25][26][27][23,25,26,27], and pulmonary hypertension [28][29][28,29]. These studies provide an evidence base for the clinical translation of EVs in ILD diagnosis and the utilization of therapeutic EVs for treatment.

EVs are easily quantifiable and have features amenable to direct (i.e., as treatments) and indirect (i.e., as diagnostic tools) therapeutic applications. These include stability, cargo transfer, and direct regulation of disease pathogenesis. The current gold standard of ILDs diagnosis is invasive procedures such as transbronchial cryobiopsy through bronchoscopy or surgical lung biopsy [30]. These approaches are associated with an increased risk of procedural complications and clinical intolerability, particularly in patients with respiratory insufficiency [31][32][30–32]. As a result, noninvasive and reliable biomarkers for ILDs are needed for more effective clinical management and care. Additionally, EVs can also be used to monitor disease progression and response to treatment. The physiologic and pathogenic roles of EVs suggests their utility as a therapeutic platform in the restoration of organ homeostasis and reversal of tissue damage. Indeed, the steady migration of cells to EV therapy in regenerative medicine is primarily due to the versatility of these particles over traditional cell transplantation therapy [33][34][35][22,33–35]. The advancement of EV cargo content engineering renders EVs more versatile and customizable to several disease types [36]. Despite significant progress, some limitations have limited the transition of EVs to clinical studies [37]. Therefore, this review focuses on the current understanding of the molecular pathways that drive ILDs and the role of EVs in disease progression. We further discuss the applicability of EV translation in the context of biomarker development and EV therapy.

2. Extracellular Vesicles

Extracellular vesicles are lipid bilayer nanoparticles secreted by nearly all cell types and comprise several classes of particles delineated by size and pathway of biogenesis. For instance, exosomes are smaller (30-150 nm) particles produced through the late endosome with selective packaging of cargo. Ectosomes (e.g., microvesicles, apoptosomes, etc.) (100 nm–1 µm) are passively shed from the plasma membrane. However, evidence from the cancer biology and hypersensitivity models demonstrates that ectosome content will change based on different cell stimuli (i.e., stress, antigen exposure, etc.) [38]. Whether this is a reflection of the internal contents of the cell (in response to stimuli) or evidence of bona fide cargo-sorting remains to be verified. However, a recent report indicated that pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) can be sorted into hepatocellular carcinoma ectosomes through the sumoylation process [39]. EVs also carry a plethora of signaling mediators, including several classes of non-coding RNAs (micro-RNAs, long noncoding RNAs, Piwi RNAs, etc.), proteins (growth factors, transcription factors, etc.), and lipids [40][41][40,41]. The discovery of extracellular vesicles [42][43][42,43] and their biological roles appears to be significant in a variety of human diseases, namely in chronic conditions such as pulmonary disease, cancer, diabetes, heart diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, kidney failure, liver cirrhosis, etc. [44][45][46][47][48][49][44–49]. Primarily, the demonstration of EVs facilitating intercellular communication has created a paradigm shift in our understanding of disease pathogenesis [50]. It offers novel tools that aid in the fundamental understanding of basic disease pathogenesis and the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic platforms [51]. EVs play essential functional roles in maintaining tissue/organ homeostasis during normal development [52][53][52,53] and also in disease progression, including tissue damage, fibrosis, and metastasis [54][55][56][54–56]. The biological functions of EVs rely on signal transduction of EV-associated cargo molecules, which alter the transcriptome and epigenome of recipient cells. These EVs mediate communication and phenotypic change within and between tissues [45–48].

3. EVs in ILD Pathogenesis

The key cellular players in ILD pathogenesis include alveolar epithelial cells, lung fibroblasts, leukocytes, and endothelial cells [57]. Crosstalk between these cell types in the context of the injured lung microenvironment is mediated, at least in part, by EVs [58]. For instance, alveolar macrophage-, neutrophil-, and epithelial cell-derived EVs sampled from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) mediate the acute and resolution phases of acute lung injury through the transfer of proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL1-β [59][60][61][59–61]. Indeed, in EVs isolated from human healthy volunteers, BALF carries MHC I and II, CD54, CD63, and the co-stimulatory molecule CD86, implicating their potential roles in immune regulation [62]. Similar studies in other chronic respiratory conditions (e.g., asthma, COPD, and lung cancer) confirm the disease-propagating role of EVs [63][64][63,64]. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in lung microenvironment signaling. Furthermore, through universal inflammatory and fibrotic processes, EVs are likely to play similarly critical roles in ILDs.

3.1. EVs in Nonidiopathic Interstitial Lung Diseases

Nonidiopathic ILDs are defined as ILDs with known causes, such as connective tissue disorders, toxic environmental exposures, or chronic inflammatory lung diseases such as sarcoidosis [65]. The implication of EVs in non-idiopathic ILDs is gaining increasing interest. A higher quantity of EV-associated proteins, called tissue factor (TF), were found in microvesicles (MVs, size ranged 0.05-1μm) in the BALF of pulmonary fibrosis cases (4 known cause ILDs and 15 IIP patients). EV-bound tissue factor (TF) activity was associated with disease severity, highlighting the possible causal relationship between pathogenic MVs and lung damage [66]. TF-bearing MVs stimulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in human lung epithelial cell lines (A549 and NHBEC), suggesting that these MVs propagate injury (and fibrosis development) across the pulmonary epithelium.

A few studies of pulmonary sarcoidosis, a chronic inflammatory ILD, showed that sarcoidosis patients had a higher EV-burden in their BALF [67][68] [67–69]. These EVs retained proinflammatory properties as demonstrated by their capacity to induce interferon-γ (IFNγ) and interleukin IL-13 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and IL-8 from epithelial cells [67]. Others also reported that BALF-derived EVs from sarcoidosis patients stimulated monocytes to release IL-1β, IL-6, CCL2, and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) [69]. These proinflammatory mediators promote lung inflammation that leads to fibrosis progression in patients with sarcoidosis. Therefore, EVs carry specific cargoes that can induce inflammatory responses in both immune and lung epithelial cells. Further characterization of these cargoes and their involvement in lung fibroproliferation is needed to understand the contribution of EVs to ILD pathogenesis and prognosis.

3.2. EVs in Idiopathic Interstitial Lung Diseases

The most common interstitial lung disease in this category is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Single-cell RNA-sequencing of human and mouse lungs indicated that many cell types in the lungs are involved in IPF pathogenesis [70][71][70,71]. Most of those cells secrete EVs that drive lung fibroproliferative processes through activation of profibrotic signaling pathways such as transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling, wingless N-type (Wnt)/β-catenin signaling, and cellular senescence.

EVs mediate lung fibroproliferation through the activation of TGFβ signaling, a well-established profibrotic pathway. It has been shown that TGFβ stimulates human and mouse fibroblasts to secrete EVs enriched in Program Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) protein [72]. EV-associated PD-L1 further promotes lung fibroblast activation, proliferation, and paracrine-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation [72]. We and others have shown that EV-associated miRNAs from injured tissue have lower levels of antifibrotic TGFβ -regulating miRs [21]. In particular, miR-144-3p, miR-142-3p miR-34-b, and miR-503-5p are depleted in injured lung epithelial cell-derived EVs. MiR-144-3p and miR-142-3p also inhibit phosphorylation of the SMAD2 protein in a mouse bleomycin-induced lung injury model [21]. Moreover, macrophage-derived EVs downregulate the expression of TGFβ receptor 1 (TGFβ-R1) and profibrotic genes in lung epithelial cells and lung fibroblasts through miR-142-3p [73]. Others showed that IL-1β activation on lung fibroblasts stimulated EV-associated prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. PGE2 in the EVs can downregulate TGFβ signaling on lung fibroblasts through autocrine and paracrine effects [74]. In summary, EVs carry proteins and microRNAs that modulate TGFβ signaling, a major pathway of lung fibroproliferation.

Another major profibrotic pathway modulated by EVs is the Wnt signaling pathway. Lung-derived EVs following bleomycin injury are enriched in WNT5A, a noncanonical Wnt ligand [75]. Exposing healthy lung fibroblasts to WNT5A triggered fibroblast activation and proliferation, leading to collagen production [75]. Similarly, exposing lung fibroblasts to TGFβ also induced WNT5A and promoted fibroblast activation and fibrotic expansion. Another study showed that EVs derived from lung fibroblasts of IPF patients were enriched in fibronectin (FN), a protein that accumulates in lung fibrotic tissue and increases [20] fibroblast invasiveness and lung fibro proliferation through focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src family kinases activation [20]. Others have demonstrated that Wnt activation further induces FN expression [76].

Another principal driving pathway in lung fibrosis is cellular senescence [77][78][77,78]. The involvement of EVs in other chronic lung diseases such as COPD and lung cancer through cellular senescence was reviewed previously [79]. In ILDs, one study showed that IPF fibroblast EV-associated miR-23b-3p and miR-494-3p induced human bronchial epithelial cells= senescence by suppressing SIRT3 expression, mitochondrial damage in epithelial cells, and senescence [80]. We have shown that EVs from human IPF lungs and bleomycin-injured mouse lungs had lower levels of antifibrotic miRNAs such as miR-144-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-34-b, and miR-503-5p that regulate cellular senescence, suggesting that EVs from diseased states are prosenescent and profibrotic [21].

In summary, EVs play a significant role in ILD progression and, in the diseased state, drive lung fibroproliferative processes by activating pathogenic pathways in healthy tissue (Figure 1). This suggests that EVs from patient samples can serve as diagnostic tools and that diseased tissue may be responsive to EV therapy. The former supports the role of EVs as biomarkers, and the latter supports their application in therapy [21,74].

Figure 1. Extracellular vesicles regulate profibrotic signaling pathways in interstitial lung disease pathogenesis. Major profibrotic pathways are regulated by extracellular vesicles’ (EVs) cargo molecules in driving the principal pathways of lung fibroproliferative diseases. Arrows pointing up reflect upregulation, and arrows pointing down signify downregulation.