Homeopathy and Psychological Therapies: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Karina Chen and Version 1 by Michele Antonelli.

Homeopathy is a popular, although highly debated, medicinal practice based on the administration of remedies in which active substances are so diluted that no detectable trace of them remains in the final product. This hypothesis paper aims to outline a possible reinterpretation of homeopathy in the light of psychological therapies in order to improve its clinical safety and sustainability.

  • homeopathy
  • psychology
  • reinterpretation
  • hypothesis
Please wait, diff process is still running!

References

  1. Gargiulo, L. La diffusione delle terapie non convenzionali in Italia dalle inda gini Istat: Trend e Profilo dei Consumatori. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/farmaci/pdf/FEP2015/Gargiulo.pdf (accessed on 8 February 2020).
  2. Relton, C.; Cooper, K.; Viksveen, P.; Fibert, P.; Thomas, K. Prevalence of homeopathy use by the general population worldwide: A systematic review. Homeopathy 2017, 106, 69–78, doi:10.1016/j.homp.2017.03.002.
  3. Grimes, D.R. Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible: Original Article. Focus Altern. Complement. Ther. 2012, 17, 149–155, doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x.
  4. Loudon, I. A brief history of homeopathy. J. R. Soc. Med. 2006, 99, 607–610, doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.12.607.
  5. Oxford English Dictionary. Available online: https://languages.oup.com/research/oxford-english-dictionary/ (accessed on 13 November 2020).
  6. Come si legge l’etichetta di un tubo granuli omeopatico? Boiron risponde alle tue domande! Available online: https://www.boiron.it/come-si-legge-l-etichetta-di-un-tubo-granuli-omeopatico (accessed on 11 December 2020).
  7. GUNA. Tipologie e modi di assunzione dei medicinali omeopatici. Available online: https://guna.com/it/tipologie-e-modi-di-assunzione-dei-medicinali-omeopatici/ (accessed on 11 December 2020).
  8. High Court Backs NHS Decision to Stop Funding Homeopathy. Available online: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/06/05/high-court-backs-nhs-decision-stop-funding-homeopathy/ (accessed on 13 November 2020).
  9. Homeopathy to Remain Reimbursable in Luxembourg. Available online: https://today.rtl.lu/news/luxembourg/a/1393668.html (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  10. Pieruccini, A. Azienda USL 2 Lucca. Available online: https://www.uslnordovest.toscana.it/trasparenzausl2/localhost_8080/trasparenza_usl2/menu_orizzontaleaf72.html?id_nodo=65 (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  11. Zhang, Y.; Zehnder, J. Perché le terapie alternative sono coperte dall’assicurazione malattia. Available online: https://www.swissinfo.ch/ita/economia/omeopatia-in-svizzera_perch%C3%A9-le-terapie-alternative-sono-coperte-dall-assicurazione-malattia/42385238 (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  12. World Health Organization. Legal Status of Traditional Medicine and Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Worldwide Review. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42452/WHO_EDM_TRM_2001.2_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  13. The Lancet. The end of homoeopathy. Lancet 2005, 366, 690, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67149-8.
  14. Shang, A.; Huwiler-Müntener, K.; Nartey, L.; Jüni, P.; Dörig, S.; Sterne, J.A.; Pewsner, D.; Egger, M. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005, 366, 726–732, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2.
  15. The Lancet Paper by Shang et al. Available online: https://www.hri-research.org/resources/homeopathy-the-debate/the-lancet-paper-by-shang-et-al/ (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  16. Relton, C.; O’Cathain, A.; Thomas, K.J. “Homeopathy”: Untangling the debate. Homeopathy 2008, 97, 152–155, doi:10.1016/j.homp.2008.04.003.
  17. Baum, M.; Ernst, E. Should we maintain an open mind about homeopathy? Am. J. Med. 2009, 122, 973–974, doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.038.
  18. Ernst, E. Homeopathy—The Undiluted Facts: Including a Comprehensive A–Z Lexicon; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; ISBN 9783319435923.
  19. Novella, S.; Roy, R.; Marcus, D.; Bell, I.R.; Davidovitch, N.; Saine, A. A debate: Homeopathy—Quackery or a key to the future of medicine? J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2008, 14, 9–15, doi:10.1089/acm.2007.0770.
  20. Cukaci, C.; Freissmuth, M.; Mann, C.; Marti, J.; Sperl, V. Against all odds-the persistent popularity of homeopathy. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2020, 132, 232–242, doi:10.1007/s00508-020-01624-x.
  21. Mathie, R.T.; Lloyd, S.M.; Legg, L.A.; Clausen, J.; Moss, S.; Davidson, J.R.T.; Ford, I. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2014, 3, 142, doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-142.
  22. Cucherat, M.; Haugh, M.C.; Gooch, M.; Boissel, J.P. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. HMRAG. Homeopathic Medicines Research Advisory Group. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 56, 27–33, doi:10.1007/s002280050716.
  23. Betti, L.; Trebbi, G.; Majewsky, V.; Scherr, C.; Shah-Rossi, D.; Jäger, T.; Baumgartner, S. Use of homeopathic preparations in phytopathological models and in field trials: A critical review. Homeopathy 2009, 98, 244–266, doi:10.1016/j.homp.2009.09.008.
  24. Fisher, P.; Dantas, F.; Rampes, H. The safety of homeopathic products. J. R. Soc. Med. 2002, 95, 474–475.
  25. Jones, R. Homeopathic Universities and Schools in the U.S. Available online: https://study.com/homeopathic_university.html (accessed on 11 December 2020).
  26. Ernst, E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 54, 577–582, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x.
  27. Mathie, R.T.; Clausen, J. Veterinary homeopathy: Systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised trials controlled by other than placebo. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 236, doi:10.1186/s12917-015-0542-2.
  28. Benmeir, P.; Neuman, A.; Weinberg, A.; Sucher, E.; Weshler, Z.; Lusthaus, S.; Rotem, M.; Eldad, A.; Wexler, M.R. Giant melanoma of the inner thigh: A homeopathic life-threatening negligence. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1991, 27, 583–585, doi:10.1097/00000637-199112000-00013.
  29. Malik, I.A.; Gopalan, S. Use of CAM results in delay in seeking medical advice for breast cancer. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 18, 817–822, doi:10.1023/a:1025343720564.
  30. Posadzki, P.; Alotaibi, A.; Ernst, E. Adverse effects of homeopathy: A systematic review of published case reports and case series. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2012, 66, 1178–1188, doi:10.1111/ijcp.12026.
  31. Ernst, E. Homeopathy: What does the “best” evidence tell us? Med. J. Aust. 2010, 193, 191–192.
  32. Antonelli, M.; Donelli, D. Reinterpreting homoeopathy in the light of placebo effects to manage patients who seek homoeopathic care: A systematic review. Health Soc. Care Community 2019, 27, 824–847, doi:10.1111/hsc.12681.
  33. NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service. Clinical Evidence for Homeopathy. Available online: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sps-homeopathy.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2020).
  34. Australian Government-National Health and Medical Research Council. The Effectiveness of Homeopathy: An Overview of Reviews. Available online: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/file/14486/download?token=QRlXP4G8 (accessed on 16 November 2020).
  35. EASAC. Homeopathic Products and Practices: Assessing the Evidence and Ensuring Consistency in Regulating Medical Claims in the EU. Available online: https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  36. Chirumbolo, S. Is homeopathy a medicine? Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 48, e35–e36.
  37. Furnham, A. Are modern health worries, personality and attitudes to science associated with the use of complementary and alternative medicine? Br. J. Health Psychol. 2007, 12, 229–243, doi:10.1348/135910706X100593.
  38. Miller, F.G.; Kaptchuk, T.J. The power of context: Reconceptualizing the placebo effect. J. R. Soc. Med. 2008, 101, 222–225, doi:10.1258/jrsm.2008.070466.
  39. Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland Psychological Therapies Waiting Times LDP Standard Definitions and Scenarios. Available online: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Waiting-Times/Psychological-Therapies/docs/Psychological-Therapies-Standard-Definitions-v1-4.pdf (accessed on 14 November 2020).
  40. American Psychological Association. Different Approaches to Psychotherapy. Available online: https://www.apa.org/topics/therapy/psychotherapy-approaches (accessed on 13 November 2020).
  41. Davidson, J.; Jonas, W. Individualized Homeopathy: A Consideration of Its Relationship to Psychotherapy. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2016, 22, 594–598, doi:10.1089/acm.2015.0365.
  42. Ferris, J.A. Homeopathy and Depth Psychotherapy: A Vital Partnership; Proquest, UMI Dissertation Publishing: Charleston SC, United States, 2011; ISBN 9781244037601.
  43. Prousky, J.E. Repositioning Individualized Homeopathy as a Psychotherapeutic Technique With Resolvable Ethical Dilemmas. J. Evid Based Integr Med. 2018, 23, doi:10.1177/2515690X18794379.
  44. Budd, R.; Hughes, I. The Dodo Bird Verdict—controversial, inevitable and important: A commentary on 30 years of meta-analyses. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2009, 16, 510–522, doi:10.1002/cpp.648.
  45. Van Hootegem, H. Can homeopathy learn something from psychoanalysis? Homeopathy 2007, 96, 108–112, doi:10.1016/j.homp.2006.11.013.
  46. Demetrio P.F.; Iero, A.P. Manuale di Pronto Soccorso Omeopatico e Fitoterapico—Libro; Fotocomp s.a.s.: Reggio Calabria, Italy, 2015.
  47. Jung, C.G. The Concept of the Collective Unconscious: A Lecture Delivered Before the Analytical Psychology Club of New York City, October 2, 1936; The Club: New York, NY, USA, 1936.
  48. Kihlstrom, J.F. Hypnosis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1985, 36, 385–418, doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002125.
  49. Welch, J.S. Ritual in Western Medicine and Its Role in Placebo Healing. J. Relig. Health 2003, 42, 21–33.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback