Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Crystallite Size: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jack Zhong and Version 1 by Jack Zhong.

Crystallite size is the mean extent of coherently diffracting domains within a powder or polycrystal, a quantity distinct from particle size because one particle may contain many such domains. Diffraction line broadening is the usual access route: the Scherrer relation converts peak width into a domain dimension, and its extensions recover a size distribution rather than a single number [1]. Size broadening overlaps with strain broadening in the same profile, so separating the two requires several orders of reflection or a full-profile treatment [2]. Different routes to the same quantity give systematically different answers, as comparisons on hydroxyapatite show [3], and the same caution applies when the phase sits in a deformed matrix [4]. Whether the value should be read as a physical domain dimension or as an instrumental index of peak width depends on how much of the profile has been modelled; current surveys place these classical treatments alongside machine-learning analysis of diffraction data [5].

  • scherrer equation
  • x-ray line broadening
  • coherent diffraction domain
  • microstrain
  • peak profile fitting
  • powder diffraction
  • domain size distribution

Crystal Structures and Properties·Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials·Materials Science·Physical Sciences

References

  1. Bienenstock, A. Determination of Crystallite Size Distributions from X-Ray Line Broadening. Journal of Applied Physics 1961, 32, 187-189. [CrossRef]
  2. Ferguson, I.F. Crystallite size, strain and shape determinations on thoria from X-ray line broadening studies. Philosophical Magazine 1965, 12, 1115-1122. [CrossRef]
  3. Rabiei, M.; Palevicius, A.; Monshi, A.; Nasiri, S.; Vilkauskas, A.; Janusas, G. Comparing Methods for Calculating Nano Crystal Size of Natural Hydroxyapatite Using X-Ray Diffraction. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1627. [CrossRef]
  4. Feijoo, I.; Cabeza, M.; Merino, P.; Pena, G.; Pérez, M.; Cruz, S.; Rey, P. Estimation of crystallite size and lattice strain in nano-sized TiC particle-reinforced 6005A aluminium alloy from X-ray diffraction line broadening. Powder Technology 2019, 343, 19-28. [CrossRef]
  5. Surdu, V.A.; Győrgy, R. X-ray Diffraction Data Analysis by Machine Learning Methods—A Review. Applied Sciences 2023, 13, 9992. [CrossRef]
More
Write an Entry