Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Formal Grammars: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Dean Liu and Version 2 by Dean Liu.

Formal grammars are explicit systems of symbols and rules that characterize the well-formed strings of a language by specifying how linguistic units can be combined or derived according to defined constraints [1][2]. In a formal representation, a grammar is typically specified by a finite set of terminal symbols, a set of nonterminal symbols, a set of production rules, and a designated start symbol; the strings derivable from the start symbol determine the language generated by that grammar [1]. Formal grammars differ in the constraints imposed on their production rules and consequently in the classes of languages they can generate; they are therefore a family of formally specified grammatical systems rather than a single grammatical model [1][2].

  • formal language theory
  • production rules
  • generative grammar
  • Chomsky hierarchy

Linguistics and Language Analysis • Language and Linguistics • Arts and Humanities • Social Sciences

References

  1. Willem J.M. Levelt. Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics; John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2008. [CrossRef]
  2. Maurice Gross; André Lentin. Introduction to Formal Grammars; Springer Nature: Durham, NC, United States, 1970. [CrossRef]
More
Write an Entry