Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Sustainable Construction Management: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Catherine Yang and Version 1 by Lionel Zheng.

Sustainable construction management is the integrated planning, coordination, and control of construction project resources, materials, processes, and supply chains such that the environmental, social, and economic burdens of the built asset are minimized across its entire life cycle while maintaining functional and economic viability. The concept extends conventional project management beyond cost, schedule, and quality triple-bottom-line objectives to include lifecycle assessment criteria covering embodied carbon, material depletion, construction waste, indoor environmental quality, and workforce equity

Sustainable construction management is the integrated planning, coordination, and control of construction project resources, materials, processes, and supply chains to achieve project objectives while reducing environmental impacts and addressing social and economic considerations throughout the life cycle of the built asset [1][2]. It builds on traditional construction project management, which primarily focuses on cost, time, and quality, by incorporating the sustainability triple bottom line of environmental, social, and economic outcomes into project decision-making

[1]. The management framework establishes operational principles—reduce, reuse, recycle, and source responsibly—that govern material selection, procurement, on-site construction methods, and site logistics. It requires systematic tracking of material flows, environmental impacts of supply chains, and post-occupancy performance feedback to close the loop between design intent and operational reality [2]. The conceptual basis is the four-pillar model of social responsibility, economic viability, biophysical resource stewardship, and technical process integrity, which collectively define the boundary conditions within which construction management decisions must optimize trade-offs between competing sustainability objectives and project constraints

. These sustainability considerations may include embodied carbon emissions, resource depletion, construction waste, worker health and safety, social equity, and long-term economic viability. In practice, sustainable construction management can be implemented through sustainable procurement, such as selecting materials with recycled or renewable content, products with verified environmental performance, and suppliers that meet defined environmental and social criteria [1][3]. Waste-reduction measures include accurate material planning, prefabrication and modular construction, on-site separation of waste streams, reuse of materials, and recycling of construction and demolition waste [1][3]. Design and construction strategies that facilitate disassembly, adaptability, reuse, and recycling can further improve resource efficiency and reduce waste over the building life cycle

[3].

. Sustainability performance can be evaluated using measurable indicators such as embodied carbon emissions (kg CO₂e/m²), construction waste generation (kg/m²), the percentage of construction waste diverted from landfill, recycled or reused material content (%), energy and water consumption, and project cost and schedule performance [2][4]. Social performance may additionally be assessed through indicators related to occupational health and safety, labor conditions, and stakeholder engagement [2][4]. Life-cycle assessment and other quantified environmental assessment methods can be used to evaluate environmental performance across the life cycle of a building [5]. Integrating these indicators into project planning, procurement, construction, and post-construction evaluation provides a basis for monitoring sustainability performance while balancing environmental, social, economic, cost, time, and quality objectives [2][4].

  • sustainable construction
  • lifecycle assessment
  • green building
  • construction management

Construction Management and Sustainability •  Building and Construction •  Engineering •  Physical Sciences

References

  1. Kibert C.J. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. ISBN: 1119055172.Kibert, C.J. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; ISBN 9781119055174. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321625714_Sustainable_Construction_Green_Building_Design_and_Delivery_4th_Edition.
  2. Amornrut Det Udomsap; Philip Hallinger; A bibliometric review of research on sustainable construction, 1994–2018. JRichard C. Hill; Paul A. Bowen; Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Constr. CleMan. Prodag. Econ. 2020, 2 1997, 154, 120073. [CrossRef], 223-239. [CrossRef]
  3. Richard C. Hill; Paul A. Bowen; Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Mohammed Zajeer Ahmed; Cathal O'DOnoghue; Patrick McGetrick; Green public procurement in construction: A systematic review. Coleanstr. Manag. Econ. Responsible Consum. 1997, 2024, 15, 223-239. [CrossRef], 100234. [CrossRef]
  4. Luz Mery Díaz Caselles; Jose Guevara; Sustainability Performance in On-Site Construction Processes: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustain. 2024, 16, 1047. [CrossRef]
  5. CEN. EN 15978:2026: Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings—Requirements and Guidance; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2026. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/6200b514-96a9-4d5f-9e8f-ca74592f6aea/en-15978-2026?srsltid=AU7gw4WzG1AP-ExDJ4uy8oZFabnxIvYg29MdVErAxmp6xoHwzbyqGHsb.
More
Academic Video Service