Your browser does not fully support modern features. Please upgrade for a smoother experience.
Singing-Oriented Language and Music Education (SOLME): Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Abigail Zou and Version 1 by Markus Christiner.

Singing-Oriented Language and Music Education (SOLME) is an accessible, low-resource pedagogical and cognitive framework in which singing serves as the primary interface through which musical activities support both first and foreign language acquisition processes. Early vocalizations in infancy make the overlap between singing and speech highly perceptible, forming a continuum rather than clearly separable domains. Child-directed speech similarly shares key features with singing—such as repetition, emotional engagement, exaggerated pitch variation and rhythm—and both input forms inherently combine musical and linguistic elements. Research has shown that the overlap between singing and language abilities persists throughout the lifespan, positioning singing as a valuable facilitator of language learning processes. Singing, integrated as a musical tool, has proven effective in enhancing key abilities for (foreign) language learning—including phonological awareness, pronunciation, and verbal memory, among others—and in supporting language functioning across diverse communication disorders, from developmental fluency challenges to acquired impairments. This entry outlines the benefits of singing as an integrated means to support musical development as well as first and second language acquisition processes. It outlines functional and structural similarities between singing and language development, from early caregiver–infant interaction to formal foreign-language instruction, and then discusses the many advantages of embedding singing as a musical tool in the (foreign) language learning process.

  • singing
  • first language acquisition
  • second language acquisition
  • musical ability
  • musical development
Over the past two decades, the intricate relationship between music and language has sparked a vibrant new strand of research, revealing profound overlaps across perceptual, cognitive, and neural domains. These convergences strongly suggest a positive transfer from musicality to language development, linguistic skill enhancement, and learning more broadly. Yet, despite the substantial empirical evidence underscoring these links, it is surprising how few practical approaches exist to translate this knowledge into music curricula, language-learning initiatives, formal educational contexts (such as schools and educational institutions) or non-formal learning environments (such as choirs, community music workshops, and language learning centers).
Only a few music-pedagogical approaches combine musical development with language learning, namely Gordon’s Music Learning Theory, the Orff-Schulwerk approach, and the Kodály method. According to Gordon [1], children acquire music and language similarly as aural arts, with early listening experiences building a foundational vocabulary that supports expression through audiation, paralleling later reading and writing skills. The Orff-Schulwerk approach likewise integrates speech, music, and movement to develop musical language through improvisation, using rhythm to foster expressive and social skills [2]. The Kodály approach employs sequential singing and musical games to teach music fundamentals, mirroring natural language acquisition by emphasizing an aural-oral sequence before notation [3]. While a few music-pedagogical concepts do address effects on language learning, language pedagogy seldom incorporates musical perspectives, which is particularly striking given the existence of singing—a low-barrier activity that naturally combines music and language in culture-specific ways.
This entry demonstrates how singing serves as a tool bridging music and language processes. It begins with a theoretical foundation, showing that singing has positive effects on language abilities across the lifespan—from infancy to older adulthood, with applications varying by age group. It then examines these practical applications, summarizing studies on language learning, therapeutic interventions, and cognitive resilience while outlining effective methods for each. Singing is a widespread human practice that exists in every known culture, serving essential functions in social bonding, emotional expression, and cultural transmission across societies [4]. As a complex human vocal behaviour, it conveys basic emotions such as fear, sadness, and happiness [5], fosters shared mood states through group singing [6], and remains integral to ceremonial activities and cultural knowledge transmission [7,8][7][8].
The origins of song have been subject to extensive debate [9,10,11,12,13,14][9][10][11][12][13][14] and speculation that language and music may have evolved from song, with derivations from emotional speech [14], territorial pre-adaptations [13], courtship [10], and social bonding [15]. This evolutionary focus on song may also stem from its occurrence beyond humans in species such as apes, birds and whales [16,17][16][17]; in particular, recent research reveals that whale songs exhibit hierarchical structures akin to human syntax—not necessarily serving identical functions but displaying striking structural parallels [18,19][18][19].
These evolutionary and cross-species parallels highlight song’s important role in human communication. Contemporary hypotheses on music-language overlaps, such as Patel’s OPERA framework (an acronym for Overlap, Precision, Emotion, Repetition, and Attention) [20[20][21],21], provide a mechanistic account of how musical training can enhance speech encoding through shared perceptual and neural resources [20]. The OPERA hypothesis proposes that musical training leads to adaptive plasticity in speech-encoding networks when five conditions are met. These are: (1) there is anatomical overlap between brain networks that process acoustic features in both speech and music; (2) music places higher precision demands on these networks relative to speech; (3) musical activities elicit strong positive emotions; (4) musical activities are repeated frequently; and (5) attention is focused on fine-grained acoustic detail. When these conditions converge, shared neural systems can become more efficient, yielding general linguistic (and musical) processing benefits.
Central to Patel’s OPERA hypothesis is the idea that adaptive plasticity is grounded in the anatomical overlap of neural networks that encode acoustic features common to both music and speech, such as waveform periodicity and the amplitude envelope [20]. A wide range of studies has explored this overlap, demonstrating links between musical ability and language skills, including phonetic aptitude [22[22][23],23], duration perception in speech [24], speech segmentation [25], auditory phonological pattern recognition [26], reading ability [27,28,29][27][28][29] and foreign language pronunciation [30]. Together, these findings show consistent and positive associations between musical skills and language performance.
Precision is reflected in a growing body of behavioral and neurocognitive work showing that musical training is linked to enhanced language-related skills [31,32,33,34][31][32][33][34]. This advantage arises because musical practice heightens listeners’ sensitivity to fine-grained acoustic detail [26] and demands high temporal and spectral accuracy—for example, when coordinating within an ensemble and monitoring simultaneously performed instrumental and/or vocal lines [35]. A particularly clear case of positive transfer to speech is found in studies with native speakers of non-tonal languages: musically trained listeners, despite lacking lexical tone in their native language, outperform non-musicians in tasks such as discriminating, identifying, or detecting changes in tonal syllables in languages like Mandarin [36[36][37],37], indicating that music-driven refinements in pitch and timing processing may generalize to linguistic contexts.
Beyond higher precision demands, musical activities are typically embedded in emotionally rewarding contexts. Accurate performance is closely tied to positive outcomes—such as internal satisfaction, social recognition, and dopaminergic reward activation which strengthens social bonds—so that practicing musical activities that require sustained attention to fine acoustic detail are consistently reinforced by strong positive emotion [20,38,39][20][38][39]. At the same time, musical activities are typically acquired and maintained through extensive practice, including frequent repetitions of particular pieces, which provides ample opportunity for experience-dependent tuning of the underlying neural circuitry [20].
Finally, musical activities demand focused attention on acoustic details, similar to the initial stages of first and foreign language learning, where fine-grained acoustic perception is dominant, whereas later, in casual speech, lexicogrammatical information is often sufficient [20]. Supporting this, pitch variations in speech (e.g., high-to-low contours) enhance listener attention and arousal [20[20][40][41][42],40,41,42], which may be one reason why musicality is positively associated with early foreign language acquisition processes and outcomes [43,44,45][43][44][45].
Singing meets several OPERA conditions simultaneously, positioning it as an effective hybrid for facilitating transfer from musicality to language processing. Unlike other musical skills, singing uses neural overlap of the vocal-motor circuits, precision via fine-motor laryngeal control, emotion through embodied resonance, and attention through multisensory contour tracking—all without external equipment or high barriers to skill training.

References

  1. Gordon, E.E. A Music Learning Theory for Newborn and Young Children; GIA Publications: Chicago, IL, USA, 2003.
  2. Zalar, K.; Kordeš, U.; Kafol, B.S. Non-verbal Communication in Music Lessons. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 186, 704–712.
  3. See, B.H.; Ibbotson, L. A feasibility study of the impact of the Kodály-inspired music programme on the developmental outcomes of four to five year olds in England. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2018, 89, 10–21.
  4. Hutchins, S.M.; Peretz, I. A frog in your throat or in your ear? Searching for the causes of poor singing. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141, 76–97.
  5. Fritz, T.; Jentschke, S.; Gosselin, N.; Sammler, D.; Peretz, I.; Turner, R.; Friederici, A.D.; Koelsch, S. Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 573–576.
  6. Patel, A.D. Music, Language, and the Brain; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007.
  7. Mithen, S. The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007.
  8. Tsang, C.D.; Friendly, R.H.; Trainor, L.J. Singing development as a sensorimotor interaction problem. Psychomusicology 2011, 21, 31–44.
  9. Cross, I. Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 930, 28–42.
  10. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex; John Murray: London, UK, 1871.
  11. Fitch, W.T. On the biology and evolution of music. Music Percept. 2006, 24, 85–88.
  12. Huron, D. Is music an evolutionary adaptation? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 930, 43–61.
  13. Livingstone, F.B. Did the Australopithecines Sing? Curr. Anthropol. 1973, 14, 25–29.
  14. Newman, E. Musical Studies; John Lane: London, UK, 1905.
  15. Arbib, M.A. From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav. Brain Sci. 2005, 28, 105–124; discussion 125–167.
  16. Magdaleno, F.R.; Zaratzian, D.; Paladini-Colon, G.; Jessum, A.R.; O’Loghlen, A.L.; Rothstein, S.I. Birds of a song sing together: Adaptive choices in the use of shared vocalizations that indicate age. Front. Psychol. 2025, 16, 1567261.
  17. Masataka, N. The origins of language and the evolution of music: A comparative perspective. Phys. Life Rev. 2009, 6, 11–22.
  18. Arnon, I.; Kirby, S.; Allen, J.A.; Garrigue, C.; Carroll, E.L.; Garland, E.C. Whale song shows language-like statistical structure. Science 2025, 387, 649–653.
  19. Youngblood, M. Language-like efficiency in whale communication. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eads6014.
  20. Patel, A.D. Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2, 142.
  21. Patel, A.D. Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. Hear. Res. 2014, 308, 98–108.
  22. Milovanov, R. Musical aptitude and foreign language learning skills: Neural and behavioural evidence about their connections. In Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, Jyväskylä, Finland, 12–16 August 2009; ESCOM: Blantyre, Malawi, 2009.
  23. Milovanov, R.; Tervaniemi, M. The Interplay between musical and linguistic aptitudes: A review. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2, 321.
  24. Chobert, J.; François, C.; Velay, J.-L.; Besson, M. Twelve months of active musical training in 8- to 10-year-old children enhances the preattentive processing of syllabic duration and voice onset time. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24, 956–967.
  25. François, C.; Chobert, J.; Besson, M.; Schön, D. Music training for the development of speech segmentation. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23, 2038–2043.
  26. Christiner, M.; Groß, C. Parallels Between Second Language Mastery and Musical Proficiency: Individual Differences in Auditory Phonological Pattern Recognition. Languages 2025, 10, 272.
  27. Christiner, M.; Groß, C.; Bernhofs, V.; Nezmah, A.; Korecky-Kröll, K. The influence of musicality on expressive fable reading: Adult- and child-directed perspectives. Front. Psychol. 2026, 17, 1720324.
  28. Fonseca-Mora, M.; Machancoses, F.H.; Gryb, O.; Reiterer, S. Musical aptitude, working memory, general intelligence and plurilingualism: When adults learn to read fluently in a foreign language. Cogent Educ. 2021, 8, 1936371.
  29. Fonseca-Mora, C.; Jara-Jiménez, P.; Gómez-Domínguez, M. Musical plus phonological input for young foreign language readers. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 286.
  30. Milovanov, R.; Huotilainen, M.; Välimäki, V.; Esquef, P.A.; Tervaniemi, M. Musical aptitude and second language pronunciation skills in school-aged children: Neural and behavioral evidence. Brain Res. 2008, 1194, 81–89.
  31. Besson, M.; Chobert, J.; Marie, C. Transfer of training between music and speech: Common processing, attention, and memory. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2, 94.
  32. Intartaglia, B.; White-Schwoch, T.; Kraus, N.; Schön, D. Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12631.
  33. Parbery-Clark, A.; Tierney, A.; Strait, D.L.; Kraus, N. Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables. Neuroscience 2012, 219, 111–119.
  34. Seither-Preisler, A.; Parncutt, R.; Schneider, P. Size and synchronization of auditory cortex promotes musical, literacy, and attentional skills in children. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 10937–10949.
  35. Sundberg, J. The Science of the Singing Voice; Northern Illinois University: Dekalb, IL, USA, 1988.
  36. Gottfried, T.L. Music and language learning. In Doing SLA Research with Implications for the Classroom; DeKeyser, R.M., Prieto Botana, G., Eds.; John Benjamins: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 221–237.
  37. Christiner, M.; Renner, J.; Christine, G.; Seither-Preisler, A.; Benner, J.; Schneider, P. Singing Mandarin? What elementary short-term memory capacity, basic auditory skills, musical and singing abilities reveal about learning Mandarin. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 895063.
  38. Curzel, F.; Osiurak, F.; Trân, E.; Tillmann, B.; Ripollés, P.; Ferreri, L. Enhancing musical pleasure through shared musical experience. iScience 2024, 27, 109964.
  39. Savage, P.E.; Loui, P.; Tarr, B.; Schachner, A.; Glowacki, L.; Mithen, S.; Fitch, W.T. Music as a coevolved system for social bonding. Behav. Brain Sci. 2020, 44, e59.
  40. Rodero, E. Effectiveness, Attractiveness, and Emotional Response to Voice Pitch and Hand Gestures in Public Speaking. Front. Commun. 2022, 7, 869084.
  41. Rodero, E.; Larrea, O.; Rodríguez-de-Dios, I.; Lucas, I. The Expressive Balance Effect: Perception and Physiological Responses of Prosody and Gestures. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 2022, 41, 659–684.
  42. Rodero, E.; Potter, R.F.; Prieto, P. Pitch Range Variations Improve Cognitive Processing of Audio Messages. Hum. Commun. Res. 2017, 43, 397–413.
  43. Christiner, M. Musicality and Second Language Acquisition: Singing and Phonetic Language Aptitude Phonetic Language Aptitude. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2020.
  44. Christiner, M.; Gross, C.; Seither-Preisler, A.; Schneider, P. The Melody of Speech: What the Melodic Perception of Speech Reveals about Language Performance and Musical Abilities. Languages 2021, 6, 132.
  45. Ludke, K.M.; Ferreira, F.; Overy, K. Singing can facilitate foreign language learning. Mem. Cognit. 2014, 42, 41–52.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Academic Video Service
Feedback