De Broglie’s Dual‑Structure Action Principle and the Theory of Entropicity (ToE): From Hidden Thermodynamics to the Entropic Field — From De Broglie’s Profound Thermodynamic Insight to Obidi’s Entropic Architecture of ToE
De Broglie’s Hidden Thermodynamics and the Entropic Field: How a Forgotten Insight Anticipates the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Louis de Broglie is remembered in every physics textbook for one idea: wave–particle duality. Yet the most profound insight of his career came decades later, when he attempted something far more ambitious — a unification of mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum theory under a single principle.
In his late work, de Broglie argued that the motion of a particle is not simply a geometric path in spacetime nor a probabilistic wave evolution. Instead, he believed it was the visible expression of a deeper thermodynamic process, which he called hidden thermodynamics.
This idea faded from mainstream physics, but it contains a conceptual seed that aligns strikingly with the modern Theory of Entropicity (ToE) — a framework that elevates entropy from a statistical descriptor to a fundamental physical field. When we revisit de Broglie’s late writings through the lens of ToE, a remarkable picture emerges: he was pointing toward the very entropic substrate that ToE formalizes with mathematical precision.
The Dual‑Structure Action Principle: De Broglie’s Attempt at Unification
In his momentous work, Thermodynamics of the Isolated Particle (1964), de Broglie proposed that a particle’s natural trajectory is determined by two simultaneous extremal principles:
the principle of least action, the foundation of classical and relativistic mechanics
the principle of maximum entropy, the foundation of thermodynamics
He argued that every particle is embedded in a thermodynamic environment — a conceptual “thermostat” — that guides its motion. In this view, dynamics is a special case of thermodynamics, and quantum behavior reflects a hidden entropic process.
Louis de Broglie[1] is remembered in every physics textbook for one idea: wave–particle duality. Yet the most profound insight of his career came decades later, when he attempted something far more ambitious — a unification of mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum theory under a single principle.
In his late work, de Broglie argued that the motion of a particle is not simply a geometric path in spacetime nor a probabilistic wave evolution. Instead, he believed it was the visible expression of a deeper thermodynamic process, which he called hidden thermodynamics.
This idea faded from mainstream physics, but it contains a conceptual seed that aligns strikingly with the modern Theory of Entropicity (ToE)[2] [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]— a framework that was first formulated and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi,[13] which elelevates entropy from a statistical descriptor to a fundamental physical field. When we revisit de Broglie’s late writings through the lens of ToE, a remarkable picture emerges: he was pointing toward the very entropic substrate that ToE formalizes with mathematical precision.
In his momentous work, Thermodynamics of the Isolated Particle (1964), de Broglie proposed that a particle’s natural trajectory is determined by two simultaneous extremal principles:
He argued that every particle is embedded in a thermodynamic environment — a conceptual “thermostat” — that guides its motion. In this view, dynamics is a special case of thermodynamics, and quantum behavior reflects a hidden entropic process.
But de Broglie's momentous framework lacked the mathematical substrate to support this idea. He could not explain why minimizing action and maximizing entropy should be equivalent. He had the intuition, but not the field‑theoretic machinery.
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) provides exactly what he was missing.
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) begins with a conceptual inversion: entropy is not derived — it is fundamental. It is represented as a field S(x) defined over a manifold that underlies what we perceive as spacetime. This field has:
These properties are encoded in the Obidi Action, whose extremization yields the Obidi Field Equations (OFE). In this framework, entropy is not something that results from physical processes — it is the entity that determines which processes are possible.
This reinterpretation transforms the foundations of physics:
Once entropy is treated as a field, the duality de Broglie observed becomes a structural necessity: action is the geometric encoding of entropic flow, and entropy is the thermodynamic encoding of the same underlying field.
De Broglie’s “hidden thermostat” becomes, in ToE, the universal entropic field. What he treated as a conceptual metaphor becomes a mathematically defined physical entity.
In the entropic framework:
De Broglie’s hidden thermodynamics is no longer hidden — it becomes explicit entropic geometry.
The twentieth century saw major generalizations of entropy:
These developments broadened entropy beyond heat engines and equilibrium physics.
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) incorporates these frameworks seamlessly:
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) thus provides the field‑theoretic foundation that unifies classical thermodynamics, information theory, and generalized entropy formalisms.
De Broglie discovered that a particle’s natural path is both the path of least action and the path of maximum entropy. What his monumental framework lacked was a mechanism explaining why these two principles coincide.
The Obidi Action provides this mechanism.
Its extremization yields the Master Entropic Equation (MEE) and the Obidi Field Equations (OFE), which encode the curvature and flow of the entropic field (EF). Minimizing the Obidi Action corresponds to selecting trajectories (via the ToE potent Vuli-Ndlela Integral) that optimize the efficiency of entropic flow.
Because entropy production and entropic flux are built into the structure of the action, the path of least action is simultaneously the path that maximizes the appropriate entropic functional.
The duality is no longer mysterious — it is a direct consequence of the entropic substrate.
De Broglie sought:
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) provides all of these.
It [ToE] offers:
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) does not replace de Broglie’s dual‑structure action principle — it fulfills it. It provides the mathematical and ontological foundation that his intuition required.
In this sense, ToE is not merely a new theoretical framework. It is the realization of a historical vision — the completion of a conceptual arc that began with de Broglie’s hidden thermodynamics and culminates in the entropic field as the fundamental substrate of the universe.