Road Traffic Safety: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Vivi Li and Version 1 by Jiao Liu.

This paper attempts to examine whether socioeconomic volatility produces differentiated effects on road traffic accident indicators. Adopting the Autoregressive distributed lag error-correction model (ARDL-ECM) , this paper explores the long-term equilibrium and short-term interactions between five common economic indicators, namely, average salaries (AS), employment (EM), unemployment (UE), total mileage of highway (TMH), and private vehicle ownership (PVO), as well as road traffic-related indicators including the number of road traffic accidents (RTA), injuries (IN), fatalities (FA), and direct economic losses (DEL), using data of road traffic accidents spanning from 1999 to 2018 in China. The study found that all economic indicators except average salaries showed a long-term equilibrium with road traffic accident indicators. The Granger causality test showed that, over the short term, an increase in employment could lead to an increase in injuries, and an increase in private vehicle ownership could cause a rise in fatalities. This study demonstrates that the volatility in economic indicators indeed produces differentiated effects on road traffic accident indicators, providing a theoretical basis for improving road safety performance and formulating relevant policies.

  • road traffic safety
  • macroeconomic
  • injuries
  • fatalities
  • ARDL-ECM model

1. Introduction

Road safety performance represents one of the most fundamental indicators for the maturity of a motorized society across the world [1]. Despite people’s longtime commitment to higher road safety performance and lower traffic accident rates, traffic accidents are still one of the major public safety issues. Each year, millions of people are injured and more than 1.3 million are killed in road traffic accidents around the world [2].

Studies show that macroeconomic factors are closely related to road traffic accidents [3,4][3][4]. In this area, a large body of scholarly research has been conducted in order to determine the specific economic indicators influencing road traffic accidents. In particular, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita as an important indicator measuring the level of regional economic development has drawn extensive research attention [5]. By comparing GDP per capita and traffic accident fatality rates in 27 European countries, George Yannis [6] found that GDP per capita was positively correlated with traffic accident fatality rate and increased GDP per capita would lead to a rise in the traffic accident fatality rate. A study conducted by Douglas J. Wiebe [7] concluded that GDP growth resulted in a rise in the number of fatalities caused by road traffic accidents. Iman Dadgar [8] examined the relationship between GDP and traffic accident fatality rates in 18 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries, finding that for every $1000 increase in GDP per capita, the traffic fatality rate increased by 0.58% over the short term and 1.59% over the long term. Empirical analyses focusing on Spain [9] and other European regions [10] [10] also found that changes in GDP per capita affect road traffic accidents.

Another intensively researched indicator that is closely associated with economy is the unemployment rate. By analyzing the traffic accident data of Queensland in Australia spanning from 1958 to 2007, Son Nghiem [11] found that for every 1% decrease in the unemployment rate, fatalities caused by traffic accidents dropped by 0.2%. A study from Virginia found that every 1% increase in the unemployment rate was associated with a reduction of as many as around 2500 traffic accidents [12]. Furthermore, the Kuznets hypothesis regarding road traffic accidents has also received intensive scholarly attention [13,14][13][14]. In particular, the Kuznets relationship between traffic accidents and per capita income has been repeatedly demonstrated [15[15][16][17],16,17], which posits that traffic accidents exhibit a growing trend in the early stage of economic growth but will be effectively inhibited as economic growth continues and improvements in policy and infrastructure are achieved. In the meantime, there have also been studies showing that economic volatility affects government budgets, which in turn leads to changes in road traffic accidents [18,19,20][18][19][20]. Subject to the effect of multiple economic crises over recent years, the cyclical interactions between economic volatility and road traffic accidents have gained broader attention, and factors like alcohol taxes [21] and vehicle miles traveled [22] [22] have also been proven to exert different degrees of impact on road traffic accidents.

Despite the extensive attention paid to the relationship between macroeconomic factors and road traffic accidents, most current studies are concentrated on developed countries or regions [23[23][24],24], and very few studies have focused on cases from developing countries. In reality, most accidents associated with fatalities and injuries occur in low- and middle-income countries [25]. A report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that no low-income country had reduced the number of road traffic deaths from 2013 to 2016 [2]. This research selects China-specific data of road traffic accidents spanning two decades, with a view of filling in the blank of this type of research by providing a case pertaining to developing countries.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Unit Root Tests

The augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) [33][26] and Phillips–Perron (PP) [34] [27] tests were selected in this study. As listed in Table 31, the results of the ADF test show that all of the series conform to I(0) or I(1), and the results of the PP test show that all variables conform to I(1) except private vehicle population and average salaries. The results of the PP test allow us to apply any method of cointegration tests as all of the series fit I(1). However, the results of the ADF test indicate that all of the series are integrated at I(0) or I(1); therefore, only the ARDL bound cointegration test can be applied.

Table 31. Results of the augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) and Phillips–Perron (PP) unit root tests.

Variable ADF Test PP Test
Level First Difference Level First Difference
t-Value p I(0) t-Value p I(1) t-Value p I(0) t-Value p I(1)
RTA −5.9871 0.0002 YES −2.7375 0.0112 YES −0.5854 0.4503 NO −3.0986 0.0040 YES
IN −5.0755 0.0022 YES −809.0152 0.0001 YES −3.2998 0.0963 NO −3.3711 0.0021 YES
FA −0.9856 0.2781 NO −2.9305 0.0059 YES −2.3419 0.3943 NO −2.8792 0.0066 YES
DEL −3.0905 0.0466 YES −2.6530 0.0111 YES −0.4987 0.4866 NO −2.6783 0.0105 YES
EM −2.1425 0.2325 NO −7.8469 0.0004 YES 4.7709 1 NO −3.0781 0.0042 YES
UE −5.6648 0.0032 YES −28.7953 0.0001 YES −10.2385 0 YES −1.7892 0.0706 YES
TMH −4.5323 0.0045 YES −28.3829 0.0001 YES −2.1153 0.2412 NO −3.8421 0.0007 YES
PVO −3.0419 0.0499 YES −1.9058 0.6077 NO 1.3783 0.9999 NO −2.5041 0.3222 NO
AS −1.9444 0.306 NO −10.9525 0.0001 YES −3.9072 0.0085 YES −1.8279 0.0654 NO

2.2. ARDL Bound Cointegration Test

We used the ARDL bound cointegration test to examine the existence of a cointegration relationship among macroeconomic factors and road traffic accident indicators. The chosen lag length was based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). AIC displays superiority over other criteria because it exhibits better small sample properties [35][28]. The results of the cointegration test shown in Table 42 confirm that long-run cointegration exists among InTE, InTU, InTMH, InPVO, and road traffic accident indicators. However, the cointegration relationship between InAS and road traffic accident indicators is uncertain, because the value of the bound test F-statistic is 3.3262, which is between the upper and lower critical bounds. A study of traffic accidents from Hong Kong [36] [29] also found that the impact of GDP on traffic accidents was ambiguous.

Table 42. Results of ARDL bound testing.

Model Lag Length Based on AIC Bound Test F-Statistics Significance Lower I(0) Bound Upper I(1) Bound
InAS = f(InRTA, InIN, InFA, InDEL) ARDL (1, 2, 2, 2, 1) 3.3262 5% 3.05 3.97
InEM = f(InRTA, InIN, InFA, InDEL) ARDL (1, 0, 1, 2, 2) 163.5342 1% 3.74 5.06
InUE = f(InRTA, InIN, InFA, InDEL) ARDL (1, 2, 1, 1, 1) 8.3385 1% 3.81 4.92
InTMH = f(InRTA, InIN, InFA, InDEL) ARDL (1, 2, 2, 2, 2) 74.7924 1% 3.07 4.44
InPVO = f(InRTA, InIN, InFA, InDEL) ARDL (2, 2, 0, 1, 0) 5.9826 1% 3.07 4.44

2.3. Estimation of Long- and Short-Run Dynamics

The long-run and short-run dynamics for macroeconomic factors and road traffic accident indicators in China were estimated using the ARDL and ECM model. The results of long-run estimations are shown in Table 53, and short-run estimations are shown in Table 64.

Table 53. Long-run estimations.

Dependent Variables

Independent Variables
InEM InUE InTMH InPVO
Lag Order (1, 0, 1, 2, 2) Lag Order (1, 2, 1, 1, 1) Lag Order (1, 2, 2, 2, 2) Lag Order (2, 2, 0, 1, 0)
Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic
InRTA −0.0847 *** −7.6256 0.3954 ** 2.8726 −1.1212 *** −4.2545 12.4637 0.8872
InIN 0.1196 *** 3.9201 −0.5492 * −2.4010 −1.8217 ** −3.8434 −18.4985 −1.2762
InFA −0.1454 *** −4.7967 0.223 1.2596 3.3855 *** 10.4211 14.5688 * 1.8458
InDEL 0.0314 *** 10.2691 −0.1251 ** −2.4603 0.4314 *** 4.8703 −6.3795 −0.9322
T     0.0154 *** 5.5707        
*, **, and *** indicate the significance level at 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively.

Table 64. Short-run estimations.

Independent Variables

Dependent Variables
InEM InUE InTMH InPVO
Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic
C 2.7694 *** 35.9001 6.5080 *** 9.6169        
D(InPOV(-1))             0.6930 *** 13.7840
D(InRTA)     −0.0692 −0.7199 0.5997 *** 9.1133 0.4609 *** 6.3802
D(InRTA(-1))     −0.1678 ** −3.5285 −0.4996 *** −4.7462 −0.1360 *** −4.7498
D(InIN) 0.0184 *** 17.6991 −0.1543 −1.7276 −1.2031 *** −16.5300    
D(InIN(-1))         0.7869 *** 9.4150    
D(InFA) −0.0004 −0.2937 −0.1354 −1.6486 0.3029 *** 5.0018 0.1680 ** 2.5484
D(InFA(-1)) 0.0118 *** 9.6067     −0.8598 *** −10.3410    
D(InDEL) 0.0035 *** 6.0647 0.0204 0.4391 0.0760 * 2.3187    
D(InDEL(-1)) −0.0032 *** −5.7597     −0.2752 *** −7.1043    
ECM(-1) −0.2296 *** −35.8457 −0.8614 *** −9.5772 −0.7356 *** −25.9448 −0.0216 *** −6.5733

*, **, and *** indicate the significance level at 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively.

3. Conclusions

This study aimed to test whether economic volatility exerts differentiated effects on indicators and losses pertaining to road traffic accidents. To that end, we examined China’s road traffic accidents spanning from 1999 to 2018 and discussed the different effects of five commonly used economic indicators, namely, average salaries, employment, unemployment, total mileage of highway, and private vehicle ownership, on the number of road traffic accidents, injuries, fatalities, and direct economic losses, followed by an investigation of the long-term equilibrium and short-term interactions among these indicators using the ARDL-ECM model. We found that all economic indicators except average salaries have a long-term equilibrium with road traffic accident indicators, and their long-term relationships are more salient than their counterparts over the short term. Specifically, employment is negatively correlated with road traffic accidents and that of fatalities, but positively correlated with injuries and direct economic losses. For every 1% increase in employment, the road traffic accidents and fatalities decrease by 0.085% and 0.145%, respectively, whereas injuries and direct economic losses increase by 0.12% and 0.031%, respectively. The opposite stands true for the relationship between unemployment and these road traffic accident indicators; for every 1% increase in unemployment, road traffic accidents increase by 0.395%, but injuries and direct economic losses decrease by 0.549% and 0.125%, respectively. The total mileage of highway and road traffic accidents are negatively correlated with injuries, but positively correlated with fatalities and direct economic losses. For every 1% increase in the total mileage of highway, road traffic accidents and injuries decrease by 1.121% and 1.822%, respectively, whereas fatalities and direct economic losses increase by 3.386% and 0.431%, respectively. Private vehicle ownership is positively correlated with fatalities; for every 1% increase in private vehicle ownership, fatalities increase by 0.146%. The Granger causality test showed that, over the short term, an increase in employment could lead to an increase in injuries, an increase in private vehicle ownership results in a rise in fatalities, and the short-term variations in road traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities directly affect changes in the total mileage of highway.

We found that volatility in economic indicators exerts significantly different effects on road traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities. Such a finding may help us to establish preventative measures that are more economically efficient.

3.1. Employment and Road Traffic Safety

Our study finds that poor employment prospects lead to an increase in road traffic accidents and fatalities, while improvements in employment further lead to an increase in injuries and direct economic losses. We recommend that greater legislative efforts should be pursued in times of economic recessions to regulate drunk driving and over-speeding, reduce upper speed limits of highways, and standardize the use of safety belts in order to avoid the occurrence of fatal accidents. When the employment rate increases, more efforts should be put into providing publicity and guidance related to public safety, especially during peak commuting hours and at places like crossroads that involve high pedestrian and vehicle flows [46][30]. A good cultural atmosphere revolving around traffic safety should also be created in order to raise people’s safety awareness and prevent the occurrence of injury accidents [47][31].

3.2. Total Mileage of Highway and Road Traffic Safety

Over the short term, the frequent occurrences of road traffic accidents will inhibit the increase in the total mileage of highway. A failure to effectively control the occurrences of these accidents may affect the overall decision-making taking place in local governments and relevant management authorities over the short term, thereby producing a negative impact on the development of regional road traffic. To address the issue, we recommend that protection fences be erected for different types of road sections to raise the level of road traffic safety, on the one hand [48][32], and warning signs should also be put up around areas entailing frequent occurrences of accidents, on the other hand. Improvements in road traffic can only be achieved by ensuring the conscientious development of road traffic safety.

3.3. Private Vehicle Ownership and Road Traffic Safety

Over the long term, private vehicle ownership is positively correlated with road traffic accidents, and a short-term increase in private vehicle ownership inevitably leads to a rise in fatalities. To avoid the rise in fatalities caused by increased private vehicle ownership, approaches like increasing the difficulty in obtaining drivers’ licenses or setting up classified drivers’ licenses can be implemented in order to increase drivers’ proficiency and avoid high accident rates caused by novice drivers [49][33]. Additionally, studies have shown that risky driving behaviors such as the frequent use of mobile phones also increase the fatality rate of non-professional drivers [50][34]. Thus, such behaviors can be reduced through the implementation of an electronic policing system or the provision of adequate publicity and guidelines.

 

References

  1. Stojanová, H.; Blašková, V. Cost benefit study of a safety campaign’s impact on road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2018, 117, 205–215.
  2. World Health Organisation. Global Status Report on Road Safety. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684 (accessed on 7 December 2020).
  3. Sánchez González, M.P.; Tejada Ponce, Á.; Escribano Sotos, F. Interregional inequality and road accident rates in Spain. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 135, 105347.
  4. Sakhapov, R.; Nikolaeva, R. Economic aspects of traffic safety administration. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 20, 578–583.
  5. Bougueroua, M.; Carnis, L. Economic development, mobility and traffic accidents in Algeria. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 92, 168–174.
  6. Yannis, G.; Papadimitriou, E.; Folla, K. Effect of GDP changes on road traffic fatalities. Saf. Sci. 2014, 63, 42–49.
  7. Wiebe, D.J.; Ray, S.; Maswabi, T.; Kgathi, C.; Branas, C.C. Economic development and road traffic fatalities in two neighbouring African nations. Afr. J. Emerg. Med. 2016, 6, 80–86.
  8. Dadgar, I.; Norström, T. Short-term and long-term effects of GDP on traffic deaths in 18 OECD countries, 1960–2011. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 2017, 71, 146–153.
  9. Rodríguez-López, J.; Marrero, G.A.; González, R.M.; Leal-Linares, T. Road accidents and business cycles in Spain. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 96, 46–55.
  10. Antoniou, C.; Yannis, G.; Papadimitriou, E.; Lassarre, S. Relating traffic fatalities to GDP in Europe on the long term. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 92, 89–96.
  11. Nghiem, S.; Commandeur, J.J.F.; Connelly, L.B. Determinants of road traffic safety: New evidence from Australia using state-space analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 94, 65–72.
  12. Kweon, Y.J. What affects annual changes in traffic safety? A macroscopic perspective in Virginia. J. Saf. Res. 2015, 53, 17–21.
  13. Castillo-Manzano, J.I.; Castro-Nuno, M.; Lopez-Valpuesta, L.; Boby, J. Looking for traces of the Troika’s intervention in European road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 137, 105461.
  14. Nghiem, H.S.; Connelly, L.B.; Gargett, S. Are road traffic crash fatality rates converging among OECD countries? Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013, 52, 162–170.
  15. Law, T.H.; Noland, R.B.; Evans, A.W. The sources of the Kuznets relationship between road fatalities and economic growth. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19, 355–365.
  16. Strukcinskiene, B.; Martinkenas, A.; Towner, E.; Janson, S.; Andersson, R. Traffic injury mortality in children in transitional Lithuania—A longitudinal analysis from 1971 to 2005. Acta. Paediatr. 2008, 97, 358–361.
  17. Law, T.H. Factors associated with the relationship between non-fatal road injuries and economic growth. Transp. Policy 2015, 42, 166–172.
  18. Jusuf, A.; Nurprasetio, I.P.; Prihutama, A. Macro data analysis of traffic accidents in Indonesia. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2017, 49, 132–143.
  19. Rojo, M.; Gonzalo-Orden, H.; Linares, A.; Dell’Olio, L. Impact of a lower conservation budget on road safety Indices. J. Adv. Transp. 2018, 2018, 1–9.
  20. Sun, L.; Liu, D.; Chen, T.; He, M. Analysis on the accident casualties influenced by several economic factors based on the traffic-related data in China from 2004 to 2016. Chin. J. Traumatol. 2019, 22, 75–79.
  21. Saar, I. Do alcohol excise taxes affect traffic accidents? Evidence from Estonia. Traffic. Inj. Prev. 2015, 16, 213–218.
  22. Krüger, N.A. Fatal connections−socioeconomic determinants of road accident risk and drunk driving in Sweden. J. Saf. Res. 2013, 46, 59–65.
  23. Traynor, T.L. The impact of state level behavioral regulations on traffic fatality rates. J. Saf. Res. 2009, 40, 421–426.
  24. Mamčic, S.; Sivilevičius, H. The analysis of traffic accidents on Lithuanian regional gravel roads. Transp. Vilnius 2013, 28, 108–115.
  25. World Health Organisation. Global Status Report on Road Safety. 2015. Available online: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2015/en/ (accessed on 7 December 2020).
  26. Dickey, D.A.; Fuller, W.A. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with unit root. Econometrica 1981, 4, 1057–1072.
  27. Phillips, P.B.; Perron, P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988, 2, 335–346.
  28. Brueggemann, R.; Luetkepohl, H.; Saikkonen, P. Residual autocorrelation testing for vector error correction models. J. Econom. 2006, 134, 579–604.
  29. Li, X.; Wu, L.; Yang, X. Exploring the impact of social economic variables on traffic safety performance in Hong Kong: A time series analysis. Saf. Sci. 2018, 109, 67–75.
  30. Noland, R.B.; Adediji, Y. Are estimates of crash modification factors mis-specified? Accident. Anal. Prev. 2018, 118, 29–37.
  31. Naevestad, T.; Bjornskau, T. How Can the safety culture perspective be applied to road traffic? Transp. Rev. 2012, 32, 139–154.
  32. Butans, Z.; Gross, K.A.; Gridnevs, A.; Karzubova, E. Road safety barriers, the need and influence on road traffic accidents. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering, International Conference on Innovative Materials, Structures and Technologies, Riga, Latvia, 30 September–2 October 2015; Volume 96. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bates, L.; Rodwell, D.; Matthews, S. Young driver enforcement within graduated driver licensing systems: A scoping review. Crime Prev. Community Saf. 2019, 21, 116–135.
  34. Choudhary, P.; Velaga, N.R. Effects of phone use on driving performance: A comparative analysis of young and professional drivers. Saf. Sci. 2019, 111, 179–187.
More