La sostenibilità degli edifici dopo il COVID-19

La sostenibilità degli edifici dopo il COVID-19: Comparison

Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Ugo Maria Coraglia and Version 1 by Ugo Maria Coraglia.

IlThe concetto di sostenibilità pt of sustainability, or sviluppo sostenibilesustainable development, è statowas introdotto neluced in 1987 attraverso il Rapportothrough the UN Brundtland delle Nazioni Unite, in cui vieneReport, in which it is definito come “uno sviluppo che soddisfa i bisogni deled as "development that meets the needs of the presente senza without compromettere la capacità delleising the ability of future generazioni future di soddisfare i propri bisogni”. Il legame tra l’avvento deltions to meet their own needs". The link between COVID-19 e la sostenibilità è costituito da una molteplicità di aspetti psic and sustainability is made up of a variety of psycho-sociologici eal and percettivi, come il fatto che il modello di occupazione degli edifici risulta essere uno dei fattori ptual aspects, such as the fact that the occupancy pattern of buildings is one of the determinanti nella valutazione della prestazionning factors in assessing the energetica e della sostenibilità degli edifici edificiy performance and sustainability of buildings.

sustainability
climate change
COVID-19
impacts
architecture
building

1. Introduzctione alla sostenibilità e allo sviluppo sostenibile to Sustainability and Sustainable Development

IlThe concettopt of di soustenibilità ainability, or sviluppo sostenibistainable development, è wastato introdotto neluced in 1987 attraverso il Rapportothrough the UN Brundtland delle Nazioni Unite, in cui vieneReport, in which it is definito come “uno sviluppo che soddisfa i bisogni deled as "development that meets the needs of the presente senza without compromettere la capacità delleising the ability of future generazioni future di soddisfare i propri bisogni”tions to meet their own needs" [ 5 ].

IlThe forte e doveroso impulso contenuto nel citato rapporto a tutela dei Paesistrong and proper impetus included in the aforementioned report to protect countries in crisi o in via di sviluppo non ha, peròs or developing countries has not, however, distratto l’attenzione della Ccted the attention of the Urban Crisis Commissione Crisi Urbana da quanto accadeva e accade nelle città del mondo from what was and is happening in the cities of the industriale, dato che queste “rap world, given that these “representano una quota elevata di utilizzo delle risorse globali, a high share of global resource use, energy consumo di energia e inquinamento ambientale”. Infatti, a causa del loro comportamento e delle loro esigenze, molte di queste città hanno uption, and environmental pollution”. Indeed, due to their behaviour and needs, many of these cities have an impatto che va oltre i loro confinict that goes beyond their urbani, ricavando “risorse e boundaries by sourcing “resources and energia day from distant territori lontani, cones, with enormi impatti complessivi sugli ecosistemi di queste terreous overall impacts on the ecosystems of these lands” [ 5 ].

2. Il sThettore delle costruzioni e gli approcci alla sostenibilità nel contesto global Construction Industry and Approaches to Sustainability in the Global Context

L’industria dThelle costruzioni è una macchin construction industry is a complessa ex and articolata e, allo stesso tempoulated machine and, at the same time, decisiva per l’e for the world economia mondiale (e, di conseguenza, per ogni singola nazione). Per una lettura più chiara di queste affermazioni, guardiamo i dati suly (and, consequently, for each individual nation). For a clearer reading of these statements, let us look at the data on the volume d’affari sostenuto nelof business sustained in 2021, anno della ripresa dopo l’avvento del virus the year of recovery after the advent of the SARS-CoV-2. Il valore di mercato del settore edile in quell’anno ammontava a 7,8 trilioni di dollari e, con un virus. The market value of the construction industry in that year was valued at USD 7.8 trillion, and with a production expenditure volume di spesa produttiva di 13,2 trilioni di dollari e oltreof USD 13.2 trillion and more than 180 milioni di lavoratori impiegati in tutto il mondo, ha registrato ricavi per oltre llion workers employed worldwide, it recorded revenues of more than USD 12 trilioni di dollari. Secondo gli esperti del settore, queste cifre dovrebbero aumentare nei prossimi anni e si prevede che nelllion. According to industry experts, these numbers are expected to increase in the coming years, and it is predicted that in 2030, con un with an expenditure volume di spesa di 14,4 trilioni di dollari, i ricavi supereranno iof USD 14.4 trillion, revenues will exceed USD 22 trilioni di dollari llion [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Solo iIn Italia, spinto dagliy alone, driven by the tax incentivi fiscalies proposti dallo Stato, comeed by the state, such il Bonus 110as Bonus 110, il settore delle costruzioni è cresciuto del 27% nel 2022he construction sector grew by 27% in 2022 [ 9 ].

PIn order affrontare il tema della sostenibilità –to tackle the issue of sustainability—a concetto di per sé tropppt that is in itself far too vasto, anche se ristretto al campo delle costruzioni – si è cercato negli anni di semplificarlo scompone, even if restricted to the field of construction—over the years, an attempt has been made to simplify it by breaking down the problem indto il problemaseveral in più variabili o ambiti dies or areas of intervento. Per questo motivo, sebbene l’obiettivo finale sia sempre quello di ridurre l’impattoion. For this reason, although the ultimate aim is always to reduce the impact generato dal settore delle costruzioni, in terminied by the construction sector, in specifici si è iniziato a fare riferimento a tre diverse tipologie di sostenibilità terms, it has started to refer to three different types of interconnesseected sustainability: ambientaleenvironmental, social, sociale eand economico-finanziaria economic–financial. AncThe il CEN (Comitato Europeo di Normazione) ha cercato negli anni di dare il proprioCEN (European Committee for Standardisation) has also tried over the years to make its own contributo ion by supportando le diverseing the various professionalità coinvolte nel settore AEC dettando le regole di questo nuovo modo di concepire l’s involved in the AEC sector by dictating the rules of this new way of perceiving architettura. Ad esempio, gli ultimi aggiornamenti delle normecture. For example, the latest updates of the standards UNI EN ISO 14008—Monetary assessment of environmental impacts and related environmental aspects and Valutazione monetaria degli impatti ambientali e dei relativi aspetti ambientali e UNI EN ISO 14006— Sistemi di gestione ambientale—Linee guida per l'integrazione della progettazione ecocompatibile risEnvironmental management systems—Guidelines for the integration of ecodesign dalgono rispettivamente ale back to 2019 e al 2020 and 2020, respectively [ 10 , 11 ].

3. The L'intersezione tra sostenibilità, cambiamento climatico ection between sustainability, climate change, and COVID-19

The concept of sustainability is closely linked to climate change issues, and for this reason, in 2022, the European Commission “committed to supporting the integration of climate resilience considerations into the construction and renovation of buildings”, by commissioning the Danish consultancy Ramboll and the CE Deft, a Dutch research and consultancy centre, to undertake “a study to collect and synthesise existing methods, specifications, best practices, and guidelines for climate resilient buildings” with the final aim of drafting guidelines entitled EU-level technical guidance on adapting buildings to climate change [12].

One of the main goals of these guidelines will be to mitigate the priority risks that may affect buildings due to climate change so as to achieve an in-depth review of vulnerability and climate risk assessment methodologies (see Figure 1, RAMBOLL infographic).

Figure 1. Infographic on priority risks that can affect buildings.

This research examines a multitude of documents of various types and provenance from recent studies undertaken by the European Union and academic studies, until the regulatory instruments that guide the building sector in each individual country, “will consider any variation required for different scales of buildings, from the individual to the whole block, providing feedback on the impact, ease of use, and synergies/conflicts of the methodologies” [12].

4. COVID-19 Implications of Environmental and Economic Sustainability

In the field of environmental sustainability, with regard to the problem of climate change, research has already been trying to make its contribution for several years, but three years ago the world was shaken by a totally unexpected event, the COVID-19 pandemic.

This worldwide pandemic upset and transformed, in the space of just a few months, the way people behaved and the way they perceived the world around them, drastically altering their perception of the spaces and environments in which they daily lived, worked, or simply spent their free time [13].

The link between the advent of COVID-19 and sustainability consists of a multiplicity of psycho-sociological and perceptual aspects, such as the fact that the occupancy pattern of buildings turns out to be one of the determining factors in assessing the energy performance and sustainability of buildings [14].

During the pandemic, due to the lockdown, there was an almost complete emptying out of offices, resulting in an improvement in the sustainability rating of the buildings that housed them and a profound decrease in transport pollution, both public and private, at the disadvantage of a consequent worsening of the sustainability rating of individual buildings in the residential sector.

As shown in Figure 2, in fact, considering that the minimum cubature of a classic office room, e.g., that of a public administration, must be at least 10 cu. m. per employee, multiplying by the number of employees present (4) and dividing by the mandatory minimum height (2.7 m for residential), we obtain approximately 15 sq. m. per employee. This size turns out to be the same as required for the living room (minimum 14 sq. m.) of a residential building [15,16]. Assuming for approximation that both rooms (office and living room) have a similar number of radiant elements, it can be assumed that during the periods spent working at home, the energy consumption required to heat the classic office room is no longer shared by the four colleagues but must be multiplied by four, i.e., to heat each individual room, in this case the living room, in which each employee worked. (NB: this is of course only an example estimate, but it is intended to quickly show the effects of the lockdown and the impact on individual homes.)

Figure 2. Diagram of the evolution of energy consumption attributable to 4 employees before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Professionals and workers were not the only ones who had to quickly change their work habits, transforming their homes into private offices from which to interact by video call with colleagues. In many of those home offices, students also had to coexist and find their own space while busy trying to attend classes, study, and interact with their peers through online classes and courses. On the level of social sustainability, it should be noted that some students, for example, those engaged in the transition from middle school to high school or from high school to university, found themselves interacting for at least a year with colleagues they had never met except in virtual spaces. The future will allow us to understand how much such an event may have affected young minds in the midst of physical, intellectual, and hormonal development and what kind of social side effects it may have caused [17,18].

5. Renovations and Energy Efficiency Improvements in the Construction Sector

Once the lockdown period had passed, the slow return to normal occupation of workplaces began, which at the same time had often been subjected to a complete redesign of spaces and a strict separation of internal pathways.

Certainly, if compared regarding the concept of sustainability, the impacts resulting from climate change and that due to COVID-19 appear to be travelling on parallel tracks but at completely different speeds. Compared to the disruptions caused by the pandemic, the impact attributable to climate change appears to have effects on buildings and their users that can be observed more in the long term. In both cases, however, the more or less significant consequences of these impacts will lead to non-negligible changes in the behaviour and perception of re-occupied spaces [19,20].

Taking climate emergencies into account during the design phases becomes a fundamental aspect of the new way of conceiving sustainable architecture, and professionals must be an active part of this radical change in perspective. Driven by these motivations, a number of researchers initiated a project to direct students towards these issues even before they became professionals. By working on teaching methods and students, in fact, it is possible to ensure that they, through their academic careers, acquire the appropriate tools to implement the changes in perspective that the AEC sector needs in order to pursue better sustainable architecture [21].

In the construction sector, the desire or need to converge efforts as much as possible to achieve ever greater levels of sustainability is also dictated by purely economic and practical aspects.

In recent years, both in the Italian and international contexts, the desire to pursue the economic and environmental sustainability of buildings has encouraged the preservation of the existing heritage with respect to possible demolition, reconstruction, or new construction. Renovations aimed at preserving the aforementioned building heritage have the main objective of improving the building’s performance in various aspects, mainly energy.

In Italy, for example, considering only the hospital sector, 85% of healthcare facilities were built before the early 1900s, with the consequent result that 80% of operating theatres today are non-standard in terms of minimum suitability requirements [22].

The data for the residential sector are no longer comforting. The Italian government, with the aim of restarting the economy and overcoming the problems that had emerged due to the coronavirus, by exploiting the flywheel of sustainability, proposed significant tax breaks for renovation work in the residential building sector with the purpose of improving energy efficiency. In order to obtain these reductions, renovations had to aim for a mandatory improvement of two energy classes of the building compared to the situation at the beginning of the work.

According to the report of the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy, and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), as of September 30, 2021, the number of renovations attributable to the Bonus 110 tax break exceeded 46,000 properties, for a total of EUR 7.5 billion in investments [23].

Concerning the issues related to the sustainability of the existing building heritage, in 2013 researchers from numerous European universities and research institutions, thanks to the European Union’s Intelligent Energy Europe programme (IEE), began to be concerned and deal with “making transparent and effective energy refurbishment processes in the European housing sector”, first through the cataloguing of building types present in Europe (Project TABULA), which then extended to the “development of building stock models to assess renovation processes and predict future energy consumption”, leading to the drafting of an “agreed set of energy performance indicators that will allow key actors and stakeholders to ensure, at different levels, a high quality of energy renovations, compliance with regulations, to monitor and guide renovation processes in a cost-effective way and to assess the energy savings actually achieved”, the ultimate goal of the EPISCOPE project [24].

6. COVID-19 and Its Impact on the Global Supply Chain

Environmental sustainability and economic sustainability, although they both serve the same purpose, due to the different domains in which they operate, may find themselves making choices in opposition to each other. A glaring example, which emerged during the pandemic and has largely persisted up to the present day, is the negative impact of COVID-19 on the global supply chain. This problem has an even more serious impact when materials produced in one country are denied the shortest route to their destination site. This interruption makes it impossible to implement a sustainable supply chain, the ultimate aim of which is to try to reduce greenhouse gas emission levels by designing the fastest link between supply and demand. A link was, indeed, impossible to make during a pandemic with entire nations in lockdown [25].

Inoltr

Moreover, global supply problems are exceedingly difficult to address, not only for highly developed nations but especially for small developing states. Within this category, for example, the Small Island Developing States (SIDS), basing their economy purely on the tourism sector (e.g., the Seychelles’ GDP is 67% due to tourism), in addition to suffering from the negative impacts of climate change for years, have suffered dramatic drops in their GDP due to COVID-19, on average 7.3%, with peaks of 16% for the Maldives and Seychelles. Furthermore, the obligation to deal with disasters caused by the increasingly frequent occurrence of extreme weather events has deeply undermined their already fragile economy, hampering their ability to deal with further natural disasters. In the same year as COVID-19, for example, the pandemic and quarantine prevented SIDS from providing the necessary health and humanitarian assistance after Cyclone Harold struck.

The, i problemi dell’approvvigionamento globale sono estremamente difficili da affrontare, non solo per le nazioni altamente sviluppate ma soprattutto per i piccoli stati in via di sviluppo. All'interno di questa categoria, ad esempio, i Piccoli Stati insulari in via di sviluppo (SIDS), che basano la loro economia esclusivamente sul settore turistico (ad esempio, il PIL delle Seychelles è dovuto per il 67% al turismo), oltre a soffrire gli impatti negativi del cambiamento climatico da anni subiscono drammatici cali del Pil a causa del Covid-19, in media del 7,3%, con punte del 16% per le Maldive e le Seychelles. Inoltre, l’obbligo di far fronte ai disastri causati dal verificarsi sempre più frequente di eventi meteorologici estremi ha minato profondamente la loro già fragile economia, ostacolando la loro capacità di far fronte a ulteriori catastrofi naturali. Nello stesso anno del Covid-19, ad esempio, la pandemia e la quarantena hanno impedito ai SIDS di fornire l’assistenza sanitaria e umanitaria necessaria dopo il ciclone Harold.

La coscientific community, through the International Science Council (ISC), set up a scientific committee to support these small states as early as 2020, while the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developmunità scientifica, attraverso l’International Science Council (ISC), ha istituito un comitato scientifico per sostenere questi piccoli stati già nel 2020, mentre l’Organizzazione per la cooperazione e lo sviluppo economico (OECP) ha avviato studi per mappare l (OECP) has initiated studies to map the disastroseus conseguenze sull’economia lquences on the economie di questi stati a causa dell’avvento del s of these states due to the advent of COVID-19. Secondo l’ONU, i SIDS si trovano ad affrontare sfide sostanzialiAccording to the UN, SIDS face substantial challenges in termini di sviluppo sostenibile derivanti dallas of sustainable development from the pandemia, dal cambiamento climatico e dalle sceltc, climate change, and the politiche del resto del mondo e necessitano quindi del sostegno al choices of the rest of the world and therefore require urgente – finanziario, tecnico e support—financial, technical, and materiale – da parte dell’intera comunità i—from the entire internazionaletional community, scientifico e non and otherwise [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].