1. Introduction

Demodex mite is recognized as a commensal organism in many animals and humans, making it interesting in human and veterinary medicine. Two main species of Demodex mites have been described in humans: Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis. These mites have been implicated in the pathogenesis of certain human cutaneous disorders, including rosacea. It has been proposed that their presence in the skin merely represents an ‘innocent bystander’ epiphenomenon; however, others have advocated that Demodex plays a role in the pathogenesis of diseases or their exacerbation.

2. Demodex mites in humans

Demodex mites (Cfamily Demodicidae, class Arachnida, Oorder Acarina) are commensal inhabitants of human skin. They are saprophytic mites and are obligatory human ectoparasites. They were first reported by Jakup Henle, a professor of anatomy from Zurich, in 1841, and since then, about 65 species have been described.^[1] They are ubiquitously found on the normal skin of adult humans, with a density of < 5 mites/cm². In humans, two species have been described: Demodex folliculorum, which resides primarily in hair follicles (mainly infundibulum), and Demodex brevis, which mainly inhabits the sebaceous glands or the meibomian glands.^[12]

They comprise the normal skin microbiota and, at low densities, are innocuous. However, there is no known benefit. They are usually localized in the folliculosebaceous units of cheeks, forehead, nose, nasolabial folds, and eyelids.^[23][34] They feed on cellular proteinse mites ha and sebum by utilizing salivary enzymes. The enzymatic reaction may induce degradation of the follicle, causing perifollicular inflammation. Overgrowth of mites may also result in mechanical blockage of follicular openings. These mites have been implicated in the pathogenesis of certain cutaneous disorders, including rosacea (especially granulomatous and papulopustular types), ‘rosacea-like’ demodicosis, perioral dermatitis, blepharitis, and Hcne vulgaris, seborrheic dermatitis, Demodex folliculitis of the scalp, and human immunodeficiency virus-associated eosinophilic folliculitis. A study found significantly higher rates of Demodex infestation in patients with rosacea, acne vulgaris, and seborrheic dermatitis.^[5] The highest incidence was observed in rosacea patients.

3. Demodex mite and rosacea

ARosacea is a common chronic inflammatory skin condition that usually onsets in the fourth decade of life and affects 1% to 10% of the world's they can be population. The major types include erythematotelangiectatic (vascular), papulopustular (inflammatory), phymatous, ocular, and one granulomatous variant. Increased infestation by Demodex mite in rosacea and the term demodicosis was first described by Ayres in 1961.^[1] As mites can be present in significant numbers in about 50% of cases of rosacea, their role as an underlying contributing factor in this disorder has been debated and discussed for many years.^[34] A systemic review found a high prevalence and degree of Demodex mite in erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular rosacea.^[6] They found mite infestation significantly more likely in rosacea than in healthy controls and patients with other facial dermatoses (e.g., discoid lupus erythematosus).

Rosacea is considered a disease of the immune system associated with neurogenic triggers. Its links with Demodex mites remain unclear. However, increasing evidence suggests it may play a pivotal role in this condition. Reactivation of the immune system, localized inflammation, and follicular changes caused by the mites are suggested to contribute to the development of the disease. It has been proposed that facial skin affected by rosacea provides an appropriate environment or fertile ground for the multiplication of these mites, and their presence merely illustrates an ‘innocent bystander’ epiphenomenonn and not a causal event. Others have advocated that Demodex plays a part as a root cause of rosacea, and some expressions of this condition may depict a response to the overabundance of these mites. Demodex has the necessary elements to stimulate the host’s immune system. These mites may produce local immunosuppression, permitting them to survive and play an essential role as a skin pathogen.^[47] This idea is also upheld by the fact that rosacea signs and symptoms may , especially papulopustules, improve once Demodex is adequately treated. with acaricidal agents (e.g., topical permethrin and ivermectin). Some have supported the argument that Demodex may not contribute to the root cause of rosacea; however, their overabundance is a cofactor in causing folliculitis and abscess formation, further aggravating and exacerbating pre-existing disease.

H4. Mistopathologcroscopic changes in the skin due to Demodex

Standardized skin surface biopsy technique with cyanoacrylate glue is a semi-invasive method used to measure the density of Demodex mite.^[5] Other sampling or examination methods include the tape method, pressuring method to express follicular contents, conventional skin biopsy, confocal microscopy, and polymerase chain reaction-based method.^[6] The mere presence of mites does not indicate pathogenicity, and their increased density, extrafollicular location, and inflammatory response are better indicators. Demodex infestation, defined as a density of ≥ 5 mites/cm², is closely related to pathogenic activity.

A conventional skin biopsy, such as a punch biopsy, can be more helpful in assessing the inflammatory changes. From a histopathologic point of view, it is common to see Demodex mites in facial biopsies from patients suffering from rosacea. Most often, they are observed residing within folliculosebaceous units; however, occasionally, folliculitis with extrafollicular mites surrounded by dermal granulomatous or suppurative inflammation is noted.^[8] Giant cell gran also be notedulomas with multinucleate histiocytes attempting to phagocytize the mite are noted. The perifollicular infiltrate correlates with the number of Demodex mites residing in the hair follicle.^[5] An abnormal number of mites or their position in an abnormal location (such as the dermis) has been endorsed as a measure to be considered a causative agent in athe case of rosacea.^[69]

B In up to 66% of cases of granulomatous rosacea, Demodex mith figues have been found. A marked decrease in the inflammatory infiltrate after acaricidal therapy has been demonstrated, which suggests that the mites had caused the inflammation.^[10]

Figure 1: 

Figure 2:

Figures 1 and 2 above (Hematoxylin and Eosin, original magnification x400) show a parasitized multinucleate giant histiocyte containing a Demodex mite. The biopsy is from a nasal skin lesion in a patient with rosacea. Following damage to the hair follicle, the mite has entered the dermis, causing a granulomatous reaction around it.

5. Summary:

In sum, Demodex proliferation in human skin could be a consequence rather than the cause, a pathogen causing the disease, or an aggravating factor that exacerbates the disease. The debate regarding the pathogenic role of Demodex in rosacea will continue. However, when an organism can enter the dermis and cause a significant inflammatory reaction around itself, the hypothesis that it is just an ‘innocent bystander’ appears unlikely. At least in some cases of rosacea, this mite does appear to act as an aggravating or triggering factor to complicate pre-existing disease.