Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies in Dairy Farming: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Peter Tang and Version 1 by Suresh Neethirajan.

In the pursuit of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in dairy farming, a combination of innovative practices, technological advancements, and supportive policy initiatives plays a pivotal role. Addressing the emissions from this sector is crucial for mitigating climate change impacts given the significant contribution of dairy farming to global GHG emissions, particularly methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).

  • climate change
  • net zero emissions
  • dairy farming

1. Climate Change and the Drive for Net Zero Emissions

1.1. Global Climate Crisis and its Impacts

The global climate crisis, driven by anthropogenic activities, has precipitated a series of environmental upheavals with dire consequences. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports indicate a substantial increase in global temperatures, attributable to the amplified concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) in the atmosphere [1,2][1][2]. The primary sources of these emissions include fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and industrial processes. The resulting global warming is not a distant threat but a present reality, manifesting in melting polar ice caps, rising sea levels, and increases in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events. These environmental changes have a cascading effect on ecosystems and biodiversity. The alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns disrupt natural habitats, leading to species migration and extinction [3]. Additionally, the acidification of oceans due to increased CO2 levels poses a significant threat to marine life [4]. For humanity, these changes entail dire consequences, ranging from health risks due to heatwaves and pollution to economic losses in agriculture, fisheries, and other sectors crucial for livelihoods.

1.2. The Concept and Importance of Achieving Net Zero Emissions

Net zero emissions represent a state where the amount of GHGs emitted into the atmosphere is balanced by an equivalent amount removed [5]. Achieving this balance is crucial for stabilizing global temperatures. The concept hinges on the principle of carbon neutrality, where every ton of anthropogenic GHG emitted is counterbalanced by a ton removed or sequestered from the atmosphere [6].
Achieving net zero emissions necessitates a twofold strategy: reducing the existing emissions and enhancing carbon sinks. The former involves transitioning to renewable energy sources, boosting energy efficiency, and altering land use practices [7]. Simultaneously, enhancing natural carbon sinks like forests and oceans, alongside technological solutions such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), is imperative. CCS, for instance, involves capturing CO2 emissions at their source (like power plants) and sequestering them underground or using them in various applications [8]. This balance is not just an environmental imperative but also a socio-economic necessity. The transition to a low-carbon economy promises innovation, job creation, and energy security, fostering sustainable development [9]. However, achieving net zero is a monumental task that requires concerted global action and significant investment in technology and infrastructure.

1.3. The Role of International Commitments in Climate Change Mitigation

International commitments are pivotal in the fight against climate change. The Paris Agreement, a landmark international treaty adopted in 2015, exemplifies global efforts to combat climate change [10]. The agreement’s central aim is to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels [11]. This goal is grounded in scientific evidence suggesting that surpassing this threshold could lead to catastrophic climate impacts.
Under the Paris Agreement, countries have committed to nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which are plans to outline each country’s efforts to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. The effectiveness of the Paris Agreement lies in its structure, which allows for periodic review and enhancement of these NDCs, fostering a progressive increase in global ambition. However, the challenge extends beyond mere commitment. The implementation of these NDCs requires a radical overhaul of national policies and economies. It demands a shift from fossil fuel dependence to renewable energy sources, a transformation in agricultural and industrial practices, and significant changes in consumption patterns. Furthermore, international cooperation is vital in this endeavor. Developed countries are expected to provide financial and technical support to developing nations, acknowledging the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. This support is crucial as developing countries often lack the resources to implement substantial climate action.
The role of international commitments extends to fostering a global culture of sustainability. By setting clear targets and establishing a framework for collaboration, these commitments provide a roadmap for nations to collectively address the climate crisis. They also send a strong signal to businesses and investors, shifting financial flows towards more sustainable projects and technologies.

2. Innovative Farming Practices for Emission Reduction

2.1. Optimized Feed Efficiency

One of the primary strategies in emission reduction is optimizing feed efficiency. Research has shown that improved feed quality and dietary adjustments can significantly reduce methane emissions from enteric fermentation. Feed additives, such as lipids, tannins, and certain enzymes, have been studied for their potential to reduce methane production during digestion [57,58,59][12][13][14]. Furthermore, precision feeding techniques, ensuring each animal receives a diet tailored to its specific needs, not only improve the feed conversion efficiency but also reduce the overall carbon footprint of the dairy operation.

2.2. Advanced Manure Management

Manure management represents a substantial opportunity for emission reduction. Traditional manure storage and treatment methods often lead to significant methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Implementing advanced techniques, such as anaerobic digestion, can convert manure into biogas, a renewable energy source, while significantly reducing emissions [60,61][15][16]. Moreover, innovative practices like composting and improved storage and application methods can minimize emissions from manure handling.

2.3. Pasture-Based Farming

Transitioning to pasture-based systems can also contribute to lowering GHG emissions. Grazing systems promote better manure distribution and can enhance soil carbon sequestration, reducing the overall carbon footprint compared to conventional confinement systems [62,63][17][18].

2.4. Precision Agriculture

The application of precision agriculture technologies is a game-changer in reducing emissions. Using tools such as GPS, sensors, and data analytics, dairy farmers can optimize resource use, thereby reducing emissions [64,65][19][20]. For instance, sensor-based technologies can monitor soil health and moisture levels, enabling more efficient use of fertilizers and irrigation, thereby reducing nitrous oxide emissions from synthetic fertilizers.

2.5. Biogas Systems

The adoption of biogas systems for energy production from dairy waste not only provides a sustainable energy source but also plays a critical role in methane emission reduction. These systems capture methane from manure and convert it into bioenergy, effectively reducing the methane emissions associated with manure management practices. The biogas produced can be used for heating, electricity generation, or even as a vehicle fuel, contributing to the overall energy sustainability of the dairy farm.

2.6. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies

Emerging CCS technologies offer potential in mitigating the climatic impact of dairy operations [66][21]. While still in development, these technologies aim to capture carbon emissions directly from various sources within dairy farms, including manure management systems and energy consumption processes. Implementing CCS could play a significant role in reducing the carbon footprint of dairy farming.

3. Role of Policy Initiatives and Incentives in Emission Reduction

3.1. Federal and Provincial Incentives

Government incentives are crucial in supporting emission reduction efforts in the dairy sector [67][22]. These incentives can take various forms, such as funding for adopting sustainable practices, tax breaks for implementing green technologies, or technical support for transitioning to low-emission practices. For example, programs like the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (CAP) offer financial assistance for projects aimed at improving environmental sustainability [68][23].

3.2. Carbon Pricing and Trading Systems

Implementing carbon pricing mechanisms, like carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, encourages emission reductions by attributing a cost to carbon emissions [69,70][24][25]. Such mechanisms can incentivize dairy farmers to adopt sustainable practices by making emission-intensive operations more costly. This economic approach can drive significant changes in the industry towards more sustainable and low-emission practices.

3.3. Research and Development Support

Governmental support for research and development is essential in advancing new technologies and practices for emission reduction. This includes funding for research into low-emission animal diets, manure management technologies, and precision farming tools. Partnerships between the government, academia, and the dairy industry are vital for fostering innovation and developing practical, scalable solutions for emission reduction.

3.4. Extension Services and Education

Providing extension services and education about sustainable practices and technologies is critical for enabling dairy farmers to effectively implement emission reduction strategies. These services can offer technical advice, training, and support, helping farmers to understand the benefits of sustainable practices and how to integrate them into their operations. Reducing GHG emissions in dairy farming requires a multifaceted approach that incorporates innovative farming practices, technological advancements, and supportive policy frameworks [71,72][26][27]. The adoption of these strategies not only contributes to climate change mitigation but also enhances the overall sustainability and resilience of the dairy sector. Collaboration between farmers, industry stakeholders, researchers, and policymakers is essential in driving these changes and achieving substantial emission reductions in dairy farming.

References

  1. Easterling, D.R.; Kunkel, K.E. Climate Change in the Earth System. In Climate Change and Estuaries; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 23–42.
  2. Sudo, K. Atmospheric Mixing Ratios of Ozone and Radiative Forcing. In Handbook of Air Quality and Climate Change; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2023; pp. 997–1029.
  3. Pouresmaeily, M. Ecological Responses to Climate Change. In Climate Change: The Social and Scientific Construct; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 133–149.
  4. Falkenberg, L.J.; Bellerby, R.G.; Connell, S.D.; Fleming, L.E.; Maycock, B.; Russell, B.D.; Sullivan, F.J.; Dupont, S. Ocean acidification and human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4563.
  5. Rogelj, J.; Geden, O.; Cowie, A.; Reisinger, A. Three ways to improve net-zero emissions targets. Nature 2021, 591, 365–368.
  6. McLaren, D.P.; Tyfield, D.P.; Willis, R.; Szerszynski, B.; Markusson, N.O. Beyond “net-zero”: A case for separate targets for emissions reduction and negative emissions. Front. Clim. 2019, 1, 4.
  7. Huang, M.T.; Zhai, P.M. Achieving Paris Agreement temperature goals requires carbon neutrality by middle century with far-reaching transitions in the whole society. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2021, 12, 281–286.
  8. Wilberforce, T.; Olabi, A.G.; Sayed, E.T.; Elsaid, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 143203.
  9. Mentes, M. Sustainable development economy and the development of green economy in the European Union. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2023, 13, 32.
  10. Petri, F.; Biedenkopf, K. “United we stand, divided we fall”: The effects of US contestation on EU foreign climate policy ambition. Glob. Aff. 2020, 6, 381–397.
  11. Hughes, L. Warming of 1.5 °C What we do now matters more than ever. ReNew Technol. Sustain. Future 2019, 146, 24–27.
  12. Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Abdalla, A.L.; Alvarez, C.; Arndt, C.; Becquet, P.; Benchaar, C.; Berndt, A.; Mauricio, R.M.; McAllister, T.A.; et al. Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 9297–9326.
  13. Arndt, C.; Hristov, A.N.; Price, W.J.; McClelland, S.C.; Pelaez, A.M.; Cueva, S.F.; Oh, J.; Bannink, A.; Bayat, A.R.; Crompton, L.A.; et al. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions by ruminants-a way to approach the 2.0 °C target. AgriRxiv 2021, AgriRxiv: 20210085288.
  14. Min, B.R.; Solaiman, S.; Waldrip, H.M.; Parker, D.; Todd, R.W.; Brauer, D. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 231–246.
  15. Bhatnagar, N.; Ryan, D.; Murphy, R.; Enright, A.M. A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential–Global and Irish perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111884.
  16. Yao, Y.; Huang, G.; An, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Xin, X.; Shen, J.; Agnew, J. Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions: Technological advancements and global impacts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109494.
  17. Franzluebbers, A.J. Cattle Grazing Effects on the Environment: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Footprint. In Management Strategies for Sustainable Cattle Production in Southern Pastures; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 11–34.
  18. Lal, R. Reducing carbon footprints of agriculture and food systems. Carbon Footpr. 2022, 1, 3.
  19. Niloofar, P.; Francis, D.P.; Lazarova-Molnar, S.; Vulpe, A.; Vochin, M.C.; Suciu, G.; Balanescu, M.; Anestis, V.; Bartzanas, T. Data-driven decision support in livestock farming for improved animal health, welfare and greenhouse gas emissions: Overview and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 190, 106406.
  20. Lovarelli, D.; Bacenetti, J.; Guarino, M. A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic and social sustainable production? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121409.
  21. Vitillo, J.G.; Eisaman, M.D.; Aradóttir, E.S.; Passarini, F.; Wang, T.; Sheehan, S.W. The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5 °C. iScience 2022, 25, 5.
  22. Winsten, J.R.; Gorman, E.; Gravitz, A. Coordinating a “basket of incentives” to facilitate resilience in the dairy sector. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2020, 75, 144A–149A.
  23. Cameron, G.; Rosado, F.R.P.; Mederos, D.D.D. Agricultural co-operatives in Canada and Cuba: Trends, prospects and ways forward. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 22, 643–660.
  24. Stavins, R.N. Carbon Taxes vs. Cap and Trade: Theory and Practice; Harvard Project on Climate Agreements: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019.
  25. Green, J.F. Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 043004.
  26. Henchion, M.M.; Regan, Á.; Beecher, M.; MackenWalsh, Á. Developing ‘Smart’ Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review. Animals 2022, 12, 360.
  27. Steenwerth, K.L.; Hodson, A.K.; Bloom, A.J.; Carter, M.R.; Cattaneo, A.; Chartres, C.J.; Hatfield, J.L.; Henry, K.; Hopmans, J.W.; Horwath, W.R.; et al. Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: Scientific basis for action. Agric. Food Secur. 2014, 3, 1–39.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback