1. Physicochemical Methods for the Capturing, Separating, Storing, and Using of Anthropogenic CO2
The capture-and-storage technologies (CCS) and capture-and-use technologies (CCU) of carbon (in the form of CO
2) are key techniques for reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change
[105][1]. The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that reducing emissions cannot be achieved by improving the efficiency of renewable energy use and adjusting the energy mix alone. Without CCS and CCU, the total cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions will increase by 70% by 2050
[105,106][1][2]. The use of CCS and CCU impacts directly on the cost of energy generated and the rate of economic viability (cost to benefit) of such technologies. As the world continues to rely heavily on fossil energy sources, the need for an efficient method of carbon capture, storage, and/or use is critical to achieving carbon neutrality
[107][3].
1.1. CO2 Capture Technologies
CO
2 capture is the basis of the CCS technology concept, which was first developed in 1977. Depending on the configuration of fossil fuel power plants, the partial pressure of CO
2, and the pressure of the gas stream, there are three approaches by which CO
2 may be captured and sequestered. They are classified as pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-combustion carbon capture technologies
[105][1].
Technologies for separating CO
2 from flue gases, generated by the large-scale combustion of fossil fuels, include physical absorption, chemical absorption, membrane separation, etc.
[108][4]. Due to the large volume of flue gases and their low concentrations of CO
2, the chemical absorption method is the most suitable technology for separating and capturing CO
2 from other combustion gases
[105][1]. This method has certain advantages: the process is easy to control and there is no need to strongly modify the power generation system. However, the current focus in gas separation and CO
2 capture after combustion is on the searching for effective absorbers and optimizing the process to reduce energy costs
[109][5]. A low CO
2 concentration in the resulting flue gas mixture is the main reason for a high energy consumption when separating gases after fuel combustion
[105][1]. Typically, the CO
2 concentration in the exhaust gas of coal-fired power plants is 10−15%, and that of natural gas-fired power plants is even lower (<3−5%), while the volume of these exhaust gases is large. Technologically low concentrations of CO
2 in flue gases predetermine the high final costs of the generated energy
[1][6].
The method used to separate CO
2 before combustion is called pre-combustion. This technology is a promising method for reducing our carbon footprint
[110][7]. During the reforming process, fuel is pre-gasified into synthesis gas (mainly composed of H
2 and CO). Then, CO in the syngas is converted into CO
2 and hydrogen and, afterward, CO
2 is separated from the H
2. Since CO
2 separation occurs before the fuel combustion process, and the fuel gas is not diluted, the CO
2 concentration in the synthesis gas is more than 30%
[111][8]. According to calculations, capturing 90% of CO
2 before combustion reduces the net energy efficiency of the energy production process much less than capturing CO
2 after combustion
[112][9]. However, the further development of advanced technologies for coal gasification and gas turbines running on hydrogen-enriched gas is necessary for fuel pre-combustion
[105][1].
Carbon dioxide capture in the oxy-combustion process is based on technologies for burning fossil fuels in pure O
2, in which nitrogen-free flue gases containing only CO
2 and H
2O are formed. The condensation of flue gases contributes to the production of pure CO
2 (concentration of ~95%) and NO
x gas impurities. The bottleneck in this method is the need to increase the energy efficiency of the fuel combustion system in pure oxygen through the development of advanced and inexpensive technologies for obtaining O
2 from the atmosphere
[1,111][6][8].
1.2. CO2 Extraction Technologies
The development of technologies for separating carbon dioxide from the flue/fuel gas stream before its transportation is one of the cutting-edge tasks associated with the implementation of a program to reduce anthropogenic CO
2 emissions into the atmosphere. Advanced CO
2 recovery techniques have already been developed yet, although technologies such as wet scrubbers, dry regenerable sorbents, membranes, cryogenics, pressure–temperature swing adsorption, and other up-to-date approaches have been proposed.
Table 1 provides a comparison of various CO
2 extraction technologies
[113][10].
Table 1. Comparison of technologies for separating CO2 from the flue gas stream.
Technologies |
Advantages |
Flaws |
Source |
Absorption |
|
|
[114][11] |
|
|
|
|
Adsorption |
|
|
2 volumes may only be achieved if carbon dioxide utilization processes are combined with renewable energy sources
[128][25].
The use of CO
2 as an alternative carbon feedstock opens up new opportunities for the producing of fuels and valuable materials or chemicals with a high added value, complementing fossil fuel-based products, and then completely replacing them in the long term. The conversion of carbon into chemicals is an important pathway for CO
2 utilization, representing great potential for its sequestration
[129][26]. By capturing and utilizing CO
2, it is possible to produce various chemicals such as urea, formic acid, salicylic acid, organic carbonates (e.g., acyclic carbonate), cyclic carbonates (e.g., ethylene carbonate), polycarbonates, and fine chemicals such as biotin, etc.
[130][27].
Carbon dioxide may be converted to produce such fuels as methane, methanol, and synthesis gas (syngas). Dry methane reforming and hydrogenating are considered the main methods of converting CO
2 into fuel. The technical, economic, and environmental performance of the hydrocarbon synthesis process using CO
2 has been recently improved
[130][27]. The hydrogenation process involves using CO
2 instead of CO to produce methanol. The conventional methanol production process is based on the conversion of syngas obtained from natural gas. Methanol is a liquid petrochemical used as an energy carrier in the transportation sector, as a feedstock and solvent, and for the production of other chemicals (e.g., acetic acid, formaldehyde, methylamines) and fuel additives
[129][26]. It is a particularly valuable chemical because it may be produced by the low-temperature reaction of CO
2 with hydrogen and it is easy to store and transport
[131][28].
Mineral carbonation is another method for capturing, storing, and/or using CO
2. This process includes the reaction of CO
2 with natural minerals or industrial wastes containing metal ions with the subsequent formation of inorganic carbonates
[130][27]. Since there is no need to purify the gas to remove impurities (NO
xand SO
x) formed during fuel combustion, there is an obvious advantage to this method of CO
2 collecting. Nitrogen and sulfur oxides do not affect the carbonization reaction; therefore, this allows us to reduce the costs of the process of CO
2 capturing and purifying. The resulting mineral carbonates are widely used. In the construction industry, they are fillers and additives in building mixtures or compounds in the production of carbonate blocks, replacing Portland cement-based concrete blocks characterized by a negative carbon footprint. Wastes from the steel or cement industries (i.e., rich in calcium and magnesium oxides) may also be used as an alkali to form carbonates in the presence of CO
2. This is a promising technology with a potential CO
2 sequestration capacity of up to 3.3 Gt CO
2 per year, which could represent 5–12% of its total emissions by 2100. Mineral carbonates, such as hydrotalcite, may be used as catalysts in chemical reactions, for example, in polyester transesterification. In general, the mineral carbonization process is considered not only a method for obtaining high value-added products, but also a method for CO
2 storage in geological formations. One ton of CO
2 may be absorbed by approximately 1.6–3.7 tons of rock
[132][29]. Along with the production of mineral carbonates, the production of organic carbonates is also of great industrial importance. Both linear and cyclic carbonates are generally non-toxic compounds that are widely used for the synthesis of important chemicals, including monomers, polymers, surfactants, plasticizers, and as fuel additives. Aromatic polycarbonates, which do not contain phosgene or aliphatic polycarbonates (such as polypropylene carbonate, polyethylene carbonate, polylimonene carbonate, and polyurethanes), are made from CO
2 [133][30].
2. Biological Methods for Capturing, Storing, and Using CO2
Searching for the environmentally friendly technologies that make it possible to ensure the necessary level of economic growth without creating additional risks for the environment is one of the key areas of technological development worldwide
[134,135][31][32]. Among the wide range of living organisms tested during the inventing and developing of innovative biotechnologies, green plants are the most popular and promising object of research, since they are widely used in various areas of human economic activity
[136][33]. Currently, methods for the biological sequestration of climate-active gases are being actively developed simultaneously to physical and chemical approaches to capturing and storing CO
2. Biological carbon fixation technologies use the photosynthesis of green plants, inhabiting both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, to convert CO
2 into organic matter, ensuring the C–O balance in the atmosphere
[137,138][34][35]. The technologies focused on these strategies for the biological assimilation of CO
2 include blue carbon sequestration and green carbon sequestration
[19,139][36][37].
2.1. Technologies for CO2 Sequestration by Terrestrial Ecosystems (“Green Carbon”)
Under natural conditions, terrestrial ecosystems are sinks for atmospheric CO
2, influencing significantly the global carbon cycle
[140][38]. A part of the carbon fixed by plants is converted into stable soil organic carbon (SOC) through forming organomineral complexes. Another part of the carbon contributes to the formation of soil inorganic carbon (SIC) due to the formation of carbonates/bicarbonates of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium. These two systems provide soil carbon storage
[141][39]. The gross primary productivity (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems represents the annual flow of carbon between the atmosphere and the land surface. However, only about 8% of the GPP remains in the ecosystem as net primary production (NPP). The rest is lost to the atmosphere through plant and microbial respiration and heterotrophic nutrition. The main processes associated with terrestrial carbon sequestration include the retention of fixed carbon as NPP and the formation of SOC and SIC
[142][40]. CO
2 sequestration by terrestrial ecosystems may be increased through technologies aimed at increasing the carbon content of biomass and soil, namely conservation agriculture, agroforestry, biochar applications, and forest and wetland restoration (
Table 2).
Table 2. Approaches to increasing the soil carbon content.
Sequestration Strategy |
Potential Increase in VOC Stocks |
Advantages |
Flaws |
Source |
Resource-saving rural farming |
up to 1.01 t C ha−1 year−1 |
|
|
[143][41] |
Agroforestry |
up to 5.3 Gt C year−1 (global) |
|
-
The level of SOC sequestration depends on the climate, soil type, management practices, age and type of organic feedstock
|
[144,145][42][43] |
Reforestation |
0.75–5.80 Gt C year−1 depending on the price of land, region, and time |
|
|
[19,146][36][44] |
| |
|
[115][12] |
|
|
Chemical loop combustion |
|
|
[116][13] |
Membrane separation |
|
|
[114][11] |
|
Cryogenic distillation |
|
|
[117][14] |
|
|
1.3. CO2 Transportation and Storage Technologies
After CO
2 is separated from the remaining components of the flue gas, it must be transported to a storage location or to facilities for its further use. Whatever the final fate of CO
2, a reliable, safe, and cost-effective transport system is a key feature of any CCS or CCU project. Depending on the volumes involved, a variety of vehicles may be used, from tank trucks to offshore vessels and pipelines. Pipelines are considered the most viable method for transporting large volumes of CO
2 over long distances overland. For commercial-scale CCS projects, it is necessary to develop an extensive network of these pipelines
[118,119][15][16]. In order to optimize the mass/volume ratio, CO
2 is transported as a dense phase in either a liquid or a supercritical state. This requires maintaining certain temperature and pressure conditions. These technologies are quite mature and are actively used in various types of carbon dioxide transportation. However, impurities in the gases and water vapor in CO
2 capture pose a serious problem, since their presence may change the boundaries of the range of pressures and temperatures providing a stable single-phase state to pure carbon oxide
[113][10]. Once captured, the high-CO
2 stream may be transported for long-term storage or industrial reuse to produce high value-added products.
Technologies for storing CO
2 after its extraction from flue gases, generated by the combustion of hydrocarbon fossil fuels, are critical technologies for implementing CCS projects and achieving carbon neutrality targets
[120,121][17][18]. Compressed carbon dioxide may be stored in geological formations, such as deep saline aquifers that have no other practical use, and oil, gas, or coal reservoirs. Storing CO
2 in porous geological media is a promising method for reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions
[122][19]. A typical geological repository may contain dozens of millions of tons of CO
2 captured through a variety of physical and chemical methods. Typically, three different geological formations are considered for CO
2 storage: depleted (or nearly depleted) oil and gas reservoirs, stranded coal seams, and saline aquifers. The CO
2 storage potential may be as high as 400–10,000 GT for deep-saline aquifers, about 920 GT for depleted oil and gas fields, and >15 GT for undeveloped coal seams
[123][20]. However, suitable geological sites for CO
2 storage must be carefully selected. The general requirements for the geological storage of CO
2 include the specific tectonic setting and geology of the basin, its geothermal regime, hydrology, hydrocarbon potential, maturity of the basin, porosity, the thickness and permeability of the reservoir rock, the presence of cap rock with a good sealing ability, and stable seismic conditions
[122,124][19][21]. However, technologies for CO
2 storage in geological reservoirs have certain risks that must be taken into account when choosing the final pool for carbon dioxide injection. Injecting CO
2 into saline aquifers lowers the pH of the brine and dissolves iron carbonates and oxyhydrates. The dissolution of carbonates and minerals weakens the surrounding rocks and may create cracks, through which CO
2 will leak, so the chemical equilibrium of geological formations may change, creating mobile toxic trace elements and organic compounds
[121,125][18][22].
Deep ocean storage technologies are another option for CO
2 immobilization. However, they are not technically mature, as they are at the stage of laboratory development and causing active discussion and criticism in the scientific community. Their essence lies in the fact that CO
2 liquefies at depths of more than 3 km and sinks to the bottom of the sea due to its higher density than the surrounding seawater. Mathematical models suggest that CO
2 introduced in this way may provide the permanent geological storage of CO
2 even under large geomechanical disturbances
[112][9]. However, this approach is more controversial than other geological storage methods. The direct release of large amounts of CO
2 into the ocean may affect the chemistry of seawater, which may lead to catastrophic consequences for marine ecosystems. Comparatively less research has been conducted in this area, especially regarding the impact of CO
2 on marine ecosystems
[126][23]. Although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has recognized the potential of ocean CO
2 storage, it has also noted the risks that this technology may pose
[112][9].
Since CCS technologies involve the long-term immobilization of CO
2, monitoring storage locations with highly qualified personnel and appropriate infrastructure becomes necessary. According to an IPCC report, the monitoring of disposal sites will require a slight increase in energy consumption, but this increases significantly the cost of storage, so monitoring costs may be similar to the costs of transporting CO
2 to conservation sites
[112,121][9][18].
1.4. CO2 Utilization Technologies
Undoubtedly, underground CO
2 storage technologies in geological reservoirs are the fastest and largest-scale solution aimed at reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions to achieve carbon neutrality in the world economy
[127][24]. However, it should be taken into account that the current volume of the secondary industrial use of CO
2 (>200 Mt per year) is clearly insufficient compared to the global CO
2 production (37,000 Mt per year). The conversion of large CO
Wetland restoration |
0.35–1.10 t C ha |
−1 | year−1 depending on the landscape and depth |
|
|
[147][45] |
Biochar |
can offset up to 12% of annual net anthropogenic CO2 emissions |
|
-
Various data on effects on soil quality
-
Different effects on priming vary depending on soil type
-
Differential impacts on SOC stocks depending on biochar type and age
|
[19,148][36][46] |
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defines conservation agriculture (CA) as a system of farming that promotes minimal soil disturbance (by using no-till or low-till practices) and crop diversification, and thus maintains permanent soil cover
[143][41]. Because CA is often considered synonymous with low or no tillage, this issue demands assessing the potential of CA methods to improve the SOC and its yield due to data variability. Because three-part CA is often studied separately or applied in research or practice, the actual impact of CA on POC is unclear. The amount of carbon input plays a decisive role in increasing the SOC due to its GPP. The type of crop, intensity, and duration of cultivation predetermine the carbon input. Using deep-rooted plant species with high above- and below-ground biomass and increasing the number of harvests per year may thus increase the carbon storage capacity of CA systems
[149][47]. In addition to the benefits associated with SOC, CA improves farm economics, the planting schedule’s flexibility, weed control, soil protection and fertilization, the efficiency of nutrient usage, and water usage and retention. This has accelerated the implementation of CA worldwide with the average rate of global expansion amounting to 10.5 million hectares of arable land per year
[150][48].
Agroforestry is alternative climate change mitigation strategy. The system integrates trees into the agricultural landscape. The conversion of land use from forests and grasslands to plantations significantly reduces SOC stocks. Agroforestry may restore up to 35% of lost forest carbon reserves
[151][49]. Initially, the carbon pool of agricultural biomass was considered insignificant compared to SOC. However, agroforestry makes a significant contribution to carbon storage in terms of agricultural biomass. In particular, trees have a positive effect on SOC through their deeper deposition and reduced decomposition capacity
[152][50]. The changes in soil carbon stocks resulting from agroforestry vary with tree species, tree population density, and climate, but generally appear to fit the range between agricultural and forest carbon stocks
[153][51]. All studies conducted to date in the field of agroforestry have shown an increase in SOC storage compared to agricultural monocultures, in which SOC storage rates were influenced by climate zones, the management methods used, the age of the system, the soil type, and the type of organic raw materials
[154][52]. Agroforestry systems may store ~5.3 Gt of carbon over 944 million hectares worldwide, with the greatest potential in the tropics and subtropics
[144][42].
The idea of forest restoration is central to climate change mitigation because it offers an effective alternative to other, more costly measures involving renewable energy or industrial CO
2 sequestration. Since the 1990s, afforestation has been widely adopted throughout the world, increasing the area of artificial planted forests by approximately 1.05 × 10
8 ha. However, achieving mitigation targets through afforestation depends on the area and carbon sequestration potential of each individual forest stand
[112][9]. From a long-term perspective, the mitigation potential of climate change through afforestation varies widely from 1.5 to 4.9 Gt CO
2 year
−1 by 2050 and from 1.1 to 5.8 Gt CO
2 year
−1 by 2100
[155][53]. However, the effects of forest restoration on soil carbon dynamics are not well understood yet and a variety of assumptions have been made so far. SOC stocks may increase, decrease, or remain unchanged after afforestation under the influence of factors such as tree species, land use history, plant age, climate and soil type, etc.
[156][54].
Currently, about 50% of the world’s wetlands have been lost, due to either agriculture, industry, or urbanization. The loss of this species-rich habitat both has a major impact on biodiversity decline and increases CO
2 emissions. Wetlands and their associated soils represent a large soil carbon reservoir
[147][45]. The drainage and anthropogenic transformation of these landscapes transform them from a major carbon sink into a major source of CO
2. Restoring wetlands by banning their development and replenishing their SOC is believed to be a potential approach for mitigating climate change
[19][36]. However, assessing the potential of their restoration to meet decarbonization goals is problematic due to the many variables affecting wetland dynamics
[157,158][55][56]. When analyzing the costs of wetland restoration in relation to the carbon sequestered, it appears that restoration is more cost-effective in coastal areas (such as mangroves) compared to inland wetlands. In the latter case, conservation rather than restoration is recommended
[159][57].
Biochar is a biomass-derived solid material derived mainly through pyrolysis, a thermochemical process completed under high-temperature oxygen-deficit conditions. Syngas and bio-oil are formed in addition to biochar as a result of this process. Biochar is a stable product with a half-life of several hundred to several thousand years, which has emerged as a promising solution for soil carbon sequestration
[160,161][58][59]. Compared to burning or decomposing crop residues, which retain only ~3% and 10−20% carbon, respectively, biochar retains about 50% of its original content
[162][60]. It is estimated that biochar may offset up to 12% of annual net anthropogenic CO
2 emissions
[163][61]. The biochar industry and market have grown around the world, realizing its potential for carbon capture and agricultural production. However, recent studies report contrasting results on the effects of biochar on soil quality, nutrient availability, and soil carbon mineralization
[19][36]. Together, soil properties (intrinsic SOC content, pH, soil type) and biochar properties (pyrolysis temperature, source type, application rate, age, C:N ratio) jointly influence the effectiveness of the biochar addition to soil in terms of soil content
[164][62]. Long-term field experiments with biochar are needed to assess the climate change mitigation potential of biochar
[165][63]. Currently, various factors affecting the SOC uptake from biochar applications make it difficult to assess its decarbonization potential, so the economic feasibility of implementing large-scale biochar application is unclear
[165][63]. The average increase in SOC content with biochar use is estimated to be 45.8%, but with large regional differences. The global potential of biochar for climate change mitigation using existing volumes of plant pyrolysis is estimated at 6.6 Mt C year
−1 [148][46].
2.2. Technologies for CO2 Sequestration by Aquatic Ecosystems (“Blue Carbon”)
The term “blue carbon” was coined in 2009 and was initially used as a metaphor to draw attention to coastal ecosystems and their role in CO
2 sequestering and storing. This metaphor subsequently evolved into a strategy for mitigating and adapting to climate change through the conservation and restoration of biodiversity in coastal marine ecosystems
[166][64]. The blue carbon concept places particular emphasis on areas with rich vegetation, which primarily include seagrass thickets, tidal marshes, and mangroves. Blue carbon ecosystems have a high potential for converting CO
2 into plant biomass. The average carbon sequestration potential is estimated at 24.0 ± 3.2 Mt C year
−1 for mangroves, 13.4 ± 1.4 Mt C year
−1 for salt marshes, and 43.9 ± 12.1 Mt C year
−1 for seagrass thickets at the global scale
[167][65]. The low oxygen concentration in their soil reduces the mineralization of organic matter in the plants’ biomass, and improves their accumulation and preservation of organomineral detritus. That is why coastal biotopes, belonging to blue carbon ecosystems, are hotbeds of CO
2 sequestration
[168][66].
Numerous studies of mangrove, tidal marsh, and seagrass ecosystems reveal their potential for an integrated approach to mitigate climate change. This led many countries to include measures for the restoration and conservation of coastal ecosystems in their national protocols for implementing the Paris Agreement goals
[169][67]. However, the practice of destructive land use in coastal ecosystems turns these water areas from CO
2 accumulators into its sources. The disruption of ecosystem networks contributes to the mobilization of previously accumulated carbon and its release into the atmosphere. According to experts, disturbed mangroves and seagrass areas account for 18% and 29% of CO
2 emissions in all tropical coastal ecosystems, respectively
[170][68]. Protecting existing blue carbon ecosystems could prevent the release of 304 Mt of inorganic carbon per year, with large-scale restoration potentially eliminating an additional 841 Mt per year by 2030, equivalent to 3% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions
[171][69].
The potential of other marine ecosystems as CO
2 sequestration sites is the subject of ongoing debate. Calcifying organisms release CO
2 during the calcification process, making coral reefs and oyster banks a source of CO
2 rather than a sink. However, the environment-forming role of coral reefs have a beneficial effect on the accumulation of carbonate sediments, the development of sea meadows and mangroves; in turn, the latter prevent high-turbidity water from entering coral reefs. Therefore, coral reefs are interdependent with mangroves and seagrass, which enhances their inorganic carbon sequestration potential
[172][70].
Pelagic ecosystems of the world ocean, especially macro- and microalgae, are considered another important link in the sequestration of CO
2 from the atmosphere
[134,139,173,174][31][37][71][72]. The net primary production of phytoplankton in the world ocean is ~60 × 10
3 Mt of organic carbon per year, which corresponds to ~200 × 10
3 Mt of CO
2 captured by primary producers from the atmosphere
[175][73]. However, only a small part of the assimilated carbon reaches the bottom and is buried in sediments (~250 Mt), equivalent to ~900–950 Mt CO
2. At the same time, the bottom sediments of the world ocean are one of the main reservoirs of carbon storage in the biosphere on a geological time scale
[176,177,178][74][75][76].
Freshwater ecosystems are of no small importance. Despite the significant difficulty in estimating the total production of freshwater macro- and microalgae, it is believed that ~70–72 Mt of organic carbon per year accumulates in river sediments, which is equivalent to ~250 Mt CO
2 per annum
[177][75].
The development of blue carbon programs may undoubtedly have a significant impact on our efforts to reduce and sequester CO
2 emissions. However, some uncertainties, such as the consequences of climate change for aquatic ecosystems, the degree of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of the anthropogenic transformation of aquatic landscapes, the role of freshwater and marine pelagic ecosystems in the global carbon cycle, etc., require further fundamental research involving large investments
[179][77].
3. Technologies for Biological CO2 Sequestration and the Production of Products with a High Added Value
The biotechnologies based on the use of the photosynthetic activity of microalgae and cyanobacteria have received widespread development in solving applied problems related to CO
2 capture and its recycling
[134,180,181][31][78][79]. Historically, microalgae have been widely used as an alternative source of raw materials for the production of renewable green energy, so CO
2 sequestration by these means was initially established as one of the potential directions for sustainable energy development research in many countries around the world
[182,183][80][81]. The uniqueness of microalgae is that they may capture CO
2 from various sources, including CO
2 from the atmosphere, from flue gases, and even in the form of soluble carbonates, and then process it into high-carbon organic biomass
[138][35]. Historically, researchers have studied microalgae both for the discovery and development of alternative energy resources and for the development of technologies protecting the environment from air pollution and allowing the sequestration of climate-active gases, primarily CO
2 [184,185][82][83].
The efficiency of microalgae at assimilating CO
2 using solar energy is 10–50 times higher than that of terrestrial plants
[186,187][84][85]. In terms of CO
2, 1.0 kg of algae biomass may assimilate ~1.83 kg of CO
2, which makes it possible to rear microalgae near thermal power plants or any other sources of greenhouse gases
[181,182,188][79][80][86]. Currently, microalgae are actively used to obtain a wide range of biologically active components, such as proteins (including the production of amino acids), fats (including polyunsaturated fatty acids), carbohydrates (including starch and fiber), carotenoids, pigments, vitamins, and biologically active forms of major and trace elements
[189,190,191][87][88][89]. This allows us to consider them alternative and industrially promising sources that ensure the sustainable production of many commercial products with a high added value
[135,173,189][32][71][87].
Along with the physical and chemical methods of CO
2 sequestration, biological methods are dynamically developing
[10][90]. The latter have some advantages. Firstly, their use makes it possible to reduce the volume of anthropogenic CO
2 emissions and to produce, simultaneously, a wide range of biologically active compounds that are highly commercially attractive for investment
[185,192][83][91]. Secondly, the cultivation of microalgae may be carried out using wastewater to provide them with nutrients. This promotes a combined approach for solving the important environmental problems associated not only with the reduction of anthropogenic CO
2 emissions, but also with the development of water purification technologies
[193][92]. Third, microalgae may survive and adapt to various extreme conditions. Their cultivation may be carried out on lands and in reservoirs, where the soil, water quality, or climate are not suitable for growing conventional crops or aquaculture, so they do not demand arable land or a source of clean water. This reduces their competition with agricultural crops for fertile land, increasing food crop areas
[194,195,196][93][94][95]. This approach helps to redistribute income in dry regions and to create new jobs for the local population
[197][96].
The main problem associated with the use of biological CO
2 sequestration is the high temperatures of the flue gases and the presence of CO, NO
x, SO
x, and certain amounts of other impurities in the fossil fuel used
[10,181][79][90]. The process of CO
2 sequestration requires detailed knowledge of the component composition of flue gases and cell biology. The main factors influencing this process may be temperature, pH, SO
x and NO
x, light, microalgae strain, culture density, critical CO
2 concentration, CO
2 mass transfer, and O
2 accumulation. Growing algae also requires selecting the species and strain for cultivation and developing a suitable photobioreactor
[138,198][35][97].
Despite the promise of using biological methods of CO
2 sequestration that use microalgae, there are still a large number of unresolved issues associated with them: as a rule, they concern assessing the economic profitability of the technological chains
[181,183][79][81]. Currently, active work is underway, the main result of which is the development of a set of biotechnological approaches associated with the sequestration of CO
2 by microalgae and the production of biologically active components with a high added value
[10][90]. Economic profitability, in this case, is achieved by localizing the entire biotechnological chain (sequestration → production of bioproducts → primary processing) to one location
[134,181,185,199][31][79][83][98].
Despite all the difficulties associated with the development of innovative technologies for biological CO
2 sequestration, it is believed that this will be an economically feasible, environmentally friendly, and sustainable technology for CO
2 fixing and obtaining the biologically active components produced by microalgae in the long term
[2,181,195,200][79][94][99][100].