Properties of Bio-Crude Oil: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Camila Xu and Version 1 by Ying Zheng.

The bio-crude oil, a dark brown viscous liquid, comprises a mixture of light hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, and remarkably, it contains a high liquid content, constituting up to 75 wt%, while generating gas and char as by-products, albeit in lower yields of about 12 wt% and 13 wt%, respectively.

  • bio-oil upgrading
  • hydrodeoxygenation
  • catalysts
  • coking
  • regeneration

1. Introduction

The increasing awareness of environmental preservation, coupled with rising global energy demand, has shifted focus towards renewable energy sources [1]. This shift is driven by the volatility of fossil fuel prices and the imminent depletion of these finite resources, emphasizing the urgent need for reliable and sustainable energy alternatives [2]. Unlike conventional fuels, ideal fuel substitutes should not only minimize emissions of harmful gases but also represent qualities such as renewability, non-toxicity, and biodegradability [3,4][3][4]. Among many potential alternative energies, biofuels, wind, and solar power stand out the most [5]. In this developing energy scenario, biomass is emerging as an environmentally friendly energy alternative [5,6][5][6].
Efficiently converting biomass into useful, low-carbon-footprint chemicals and biofuels stands as an effective strategy to address challenges presented by climate change, the depletion of fossil fuels, and other environmental problems [7,8][7][8]
Among thermochemical conversion methods, fast pyrolysis stands out as a particularly promising approach to convert lignocellulosic biomass into liquid bio-crude oils [9]. In this method, biomass is heated to temperatures between 400 and 650 °C without the presence of oxygen, causing the material to decompose into liquid bio-crude oil, solid bio-char, and non-condensable gas [10]. While bio-crude oils are produced in an oxygen-free environment, they tend to retain higher oxygen levels due to the composition of the biomass feedstock, setting them apart from fossil fuels and pure hydrocarbons [9,10][9][10]. However, the current commercial viability of pyrolysis bio-crude oil is limited due to its less favorable chemical and physical attributes. These challenges encompass the need for preheating bio-crude oil, the potential for injector corrosion, ignition delays, clogging problems, and overall engine instability. To fully harness its potential, it is crucial to significantly reduce the oxygen content in bio-crude oils and carefully control the boiling point fractions, optimizing their ability to blend with or substitute fossil-based transportation fuels [11,12,13,14,15,16][11][12][13][14][15][16].
To date, numerous bio-crude oil upgrading approaches have been explored, as outlined in recent review articles [12,13,14,15][12][13][14][15]. The upgrading can be achieved using conventional technologies like esterification, hydrogenation, steam reforming, emulsification, and cracking, as well as emerging methods like non-thermal plasma reactions. Among these, hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is recognized as a practical approach to oxygen removal from bio-crude oil, leading to increased organic phase yield, improved deoxygenation, and reduced catalyst deactivation [16,17,18,19,20,21][16][17][18][19][20][21].

2. Properties of Bio-Crude Oil

After pyrolysis, the common oxygenated compounds found in bio-crude oil include acids, aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, esters, phenolics (20–30 wt%) derived from lignin, sugars, furans, and high molecular weight species like oligomers derived from lignin, which are all present in significant amounts but in low concentrations [26][22], are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Common compounds in bio-crude oil derived from wood [9].
Different Groups Compounds Categories of Functional Groups Typical Compounds
Water - Water
Simple oxygenates

(non-aromatic)		 Esters Methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, methyl formate
Alcohols Methanol, Butanol, Cyclohexanol, Cyclopentanol, ethylene glycol
Acids Hexanoic acid, Acetic acid, Propanoic acid, Formic acid, Butanoic acid, glycolic acid
Aldehydes 2-butenal, glyoxal, formaldehyde, benzaldehyde
Ketones Cyclohexanone, Cyclopentanone, 2-butanone
Sugars and sugar derivatives   Xylose, glucose, fructose, sorbitol, arabinose
Levoglucosan
Furans - Furfural, furfuryl alcohol, tetrahydrofuran, 2-furanone, butyrolactone, 2-acetyl furan, methyl-2-furanone, 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran
Aromatics Oxygen free Toluene, Benzene, Xylene
Phenols Methylphenol, dimethylphenol, ethylphenol, phenol
Catechols Methylcatechol, ethylcatechol, methoxycatechol, catechol
Guaiacols Methylguaiacol, ethylguaiacol, eugenol, vanillin, guaiacol
Syringols Methylsyringol, ethylsyringol, 4-propenylsyringol, syringol
Miscellaneous oxygenates - 2-hydroxyacetaldehyde

1-hydroxy-2-propanone

1-hydroxy-2-butanone
High molecular weight species - Dimers, trimers, oligomers and cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin pyrolysis products
Biomass, by definition, encompasses biologically derived and biodegradable materials, excluding peat and petrified substances. Common feedstocks, such as wood, bagasse, rice straw, switchgrass, and wheat straw, are often used in the production of pyrolysis oil [27][23]. Among the various techniques, fast pyrolysis stands out as one of the most widely adopted technologies. In this process, biomass is subjected to moderate temperatures (around 500 °C) and short residence times (typically seconds) in an oxygen-deprived environment [28][24]. This results in the rapid depolymerization of biomass, producing pyrolysis vapor, which, upon cooling, condenses into a liquid known as “bio-oil”. This bio-crude oil, a dark brown viscous liquid, comprises a mixture of light hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds, and remarkably, it contains a high liquid content, constituting up to 75 wt%, while generating gas and char as by-products, albeit in lower yields of about 12 wt% and 13 wt%, respectively [29][25]. These oxygenated compounds encompass acids, aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, and esters; although they are typically present in relatively low concentrations. Moreover, a significant portion, accounting for about 20 to 30 wt%, is composed of phenolic compounds derived from lignin, including substances like phenol, catechol, anisole, and guaiacol, and also includes sugars, furans, and high molecular weight species like oligomers originating from lignin [9,30][9][26]. Oligomers are primarily found in bio-crude oil due to the depolymerization process, which entails the breaking of C–O and C–C bonds. This process is followed by subsequent dehydration and repolymerization reactions involving the primary biomass polymers [31][27]. Most of the typical compounds are summarized in Table 1. However, several factors influence the composition and production of bio-crude oil, including the type of feedstock used, moisture content, particle size, the configuration of the pyrolysis reactor, and various pyrolysis conditions like temperature, time, heat transfer rate, condensation efficiency, and char removal efficiency [9]. For instance, lignocellulosic biomass often contains a wide range of alkali and alkaline earth metal compounds such as potassium (K) and sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca). These elements contribute to various characteristics and can promote the production of acetic acid and water. For example, potassium can catalyze the decomposition of liquid compounds by promoting fragmentation over depolymerization reactions, resulting in higher yields of gas, char, and reaction water [32,33][28][29]. However, the characteristics of bio-crude oil, including its high viscosity, acidity, and oxygen and water content, result in adverse consequences when used, such as corrosion of metal components, short shelf-life, and diminished heating value [34,35][30][31]. Bio-crude oil exhibits substantial differences from crude oil in several critical aspects. Notably, it contains a water content ranging from 15 to 30 wt%, produced from both dehydration reactions occurring during pyrolysis and the moisture present in the initial biomass feedstock. Traditional distillation techniques are often used to eliminate this water content, but they prove ineffective in reducing the elevated water content of bio-crude oil. During distillation, the application of heat triggers rapid polymerization, resulting in the formation of residual solids and unwanted coke, typically in the range of 30–50 wt% [30][26]. The high oxygen content of around 30–55 wt% notably reduces its heating value of around 16–19 MJ/kg, resulting in an energy density that is less than half that of crude oil of around 40 MJ/kg. Bio-crude oil tends to have a low pH between 2–4, primarily due to the presence of acetic acid and formic acid, which can pose challenges for processing, transportation, and storage equipment. Furthermore, the presence of phenols, olefins, and acids can easily lead to the formation of macromolecules through polymerization, increasing the viscosity and density of biocrude oil and diminishing its fluidity of around 40–100 cP and density 1200 kg/m3 [9,33,35,36,37][9][29][31][32][33]. Some of the characteristics of heavy petroleum fuel oils and bio-crude oils made through fast pyrolysis are listed in Table 2. Therefore, it is essential to improve the standard of bio-crude oils by minimizing or eliminating these negative characteristics prior to its practical application.
Table 2. Properties and element content (wt%) of bio-crude oil from fast pyrolysis and heavy oil [9,33].
Properties and element content (wt%) of bio-crude oil from fast pyrolysis and heavy oil [9][29].
Properties Bio-Crude Oil (a) Heavy Oil
pH 2–4 -
Density (kg/m3) 1200 940
Moisture content (i.e., water) (wt%) 15–30 0.1
HHV(MJ/kg) 16–19 40
Viscosity (cP, 50 °C) 40–100 180
Flash point (K) 300–370 327
Solids(wt%) 0.2–1 1
Ash (wt%) 0–0.2 0.1
NOx emission below 0.7 1.4
SOx emission 0 0.28
H/C 0.9–1.5 1.5–2.0
C/O 2–3.3 -
Element Content (wt%)
Carbon (C) 48–65 83–86
Hydrogen (H) 5.5–8 11–14
Oxygen (O) 30–55 below 1
Nitrogen (N) 0–0.3 below 0.3
Sulfer (S) below 0.05 below 3.0
Na+ (ppm) 5–500 -
Ca (ppm) 4–600 -
(a) Characteristics of around 140 distinct bio-crude oil samples produced from diverse feedstocks and pyrolysis systems.

References

  1. Rogers, K.A.; Zheng, Y. Selective Deoxygenation of Biomass-Derived Bio-Oils within Hydrogen-Modest Environments: A Review and New Insights. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1750–1772.
  2. Shomal, R.; Ogubadejo, B.; Shittu, T.; Mahmoud, E.; Du, W.; Al-Zuhair, S. Advances in Enzyme and Ionic Liquid Immobilization for Enhanced in MOFs for Biodiesel Production. Molecules 2021, 26, 3512.
  3. Ambat, I.; Srivastava, V.; Sillanpää, M. Recent Advancement in Biodiesel Production Methodologies Using Various Feedstock: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 356–369.
  4. Mohr, S.H.; Wang, J.; Ellem, G.; Ward, J.; Giurco, D. Projection of World Fossil Fuels by Country. Fuel 2015, 141, 120–135.
  5. Mishra, V.K.; Goswami, R. A Review of Production, Properties and Advantages of Biodiesel. Biofuels 2018, 9, 273–289.
  6. Jeevahan, J.; Mageshwaran, G.; Joseph, G.B.; Raj, R.B.D.; Kannan, R.T. Various Strategies for Reducing Nox Emissions of Biodiesel Fuel Used in Conventional Diesel Engines: A Review. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2017, 204, 1202–1223.
  7. Shomal, R.; Du, W.; Al-Zuhair, S. Immobilization of Lipase on Metal-Organic Frameworks for Biodiesel Production. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107265.
  8. Shomal, R.; Hisham, H.; Mlhem, A.; Hassan, R.; Al-Zuhair, S. Simultaneous Extraction–Reaction Process for Biodiesel Production from Microalgae. Energy Rep. 2019, 5, 37–40.
  9. Lahijani, P.; Mohammadi, M.; Mohamed, A.R.; Ismail, F.; Lee, K.T.; Amini, G. Upgrading Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Bio-Oil to Bio-Jet Fuel through Catalytic Cracking and Hydrodeoxygenation: A Review of Recent Progress. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 268, 115956.
  10. Staples, M.D.; Malina, R.; Suresh, P.; Hileman, J.I.; Barrett, S.R.H. Aviation CO2 Emissions Reductions from the Use of Alternative Jet Fuels. Energy Policy 2018, 114, 342–354.
  11. Neves, R.C.; Klein, B.C.; da Silva, R.J.; Rezende, M.C.A.F.; Funke, A.; Olivarez-Gómez, E.; Bonomi, A.; Maciel-Filho, R. A Vision on Biomass-to-Liquids (BTL) Thermochemical Routes in Integrated Sugarcane Biorefineries for Biojet Fuel Production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109607.
  12. Wang, H.; Li, G.; Rogers, K.; Lin, H.; Zheng, Y.; Ng, S. Hydrotreating of Waste Cooking Oil over Supported CoMoS Catalyst—Catalyst Deactivation Mechanism Study. Mol. Catal. 2017, 443, 228–240.
  13. Wang, H.; Lin, H.; Feng, P.; Han, X.; Zheng, Y. Integration of Catalytic Cracking and Hydrotreating Technology for Triglyceride Deoxygenation. Catal. Today 2017, 291, 172–179.
  14. Gollakota, A.R.K.; Reddy, M.; Subramanyam, M.D.; Kishore, N. A Review on the Upgradation Techniques of Pyrolysis Oil. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 1543–1568.
  15. Zacher, A.H.; Olarte, M.V.; Santosa, D.M.; Elliott, D.C.; Jones, S.B. A Review and Perspective of Recent Bio-Oil Hydrotreating Research. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 491–515.
  16. Luo, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sun, G.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, C. Hydrothermally Stable Ru/HZSM-5-Catalyzed Selective Hydrogenolysis of Lignin-Derived Substituted Phenols to Bio-Arenes in Water. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 5845–5858.
  17. Mohamed, A.R.; Mohammadi, M. 10 - Upgrading Pyrolysis-Derived Bio-Oils via Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation: An Overview of Advanced Nanocatalysts. In New Dimensions in Production and Utilization of Hydrogen; Nanda, S., Vo, D.-V.N., Nguyen-Tri, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 241–272. ISBN 978-0-12-819553-6.
  18. Wang, H.; Male, J.; Wang, Y. Recent Advances in Hydrotreating of Pyrolysis Bio-Oil and Its Oxygen-Containing Model Compounds. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1047–1070.
  19. Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Luo, H.; Peng, H.; Wang, F. Effect of La on Ni–W–B Amorphous Catalysts in Hydrodeoxygenation of Phenol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 10936–10942.
  20. Luo, Y.-R. Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-4200-0728-2.
  21. Feng, P.; Wang, H.; Lin, H.; Zheng, Y. Selective Production of Guaiacol from Black Liquor: Effect of Solvents. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2019, 2, 1–12.
  22. Pourzolfaghar, H.; Abnisa, F.; Wan Daud, W.M.A.; Aroua, M.K. Atmospheric Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-Oil Oxygenated Model Compounds: A Review. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2018, 133, 117–127.
  23. Demirbas, A. Competitive Liquid Biofuels from Biomass. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 17–28.
  24. Brown, R.C. Thermochemical Processing of Biomass: Conversion into Fuels, Chemicals and Power; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-119-41757-6.
  25. Bridgwater, A.V. Review of Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass and Product Upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 38, 68–94.
  26. Dabros, T.M.H.; Stummann, M.Z.; Høj, M.; Jensen, P.A.; Grunwaldt, J.-D.; Gabrielsen, J.; Mortensen, P.M.; Jensen, A.D. Transportation Fuels from Biomass Fast Pyrolysis, Catalytic Hydrodeoxygenation, and Catalytic Fast Hydropyrolysis. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018, 68, 268–309.
  27. Lachos-Perez, D.; Martins-Vieira, J.C.; Missau, J.; Anshu, K.; Siakpebru, O.K.; Thengane, S.K.; Morais, A.R.C.; Tanabe, E.H.; Bertuol, D.A. Review on Biomass Pyrolysis with a Focus on Bio-Oil Upgrading Techniques. Analytica 2023, 4, 182–205.
  28. Wang, W.; Lemaire, R.; Bensakhria, A.; Luart, D. Review on the Catalytic Effects of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metals (AAEMs) Including Sodium, Potassium, Calcium and Magnesium on the Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass and on the Co-Pyrolysis of Coal with Biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 163, 105479.
  29. Valle, B.; Remiro, A.; García-Gómez, N.; Gayubo, A.G.; Bilbao, J. Recent Research Progress on Bio-Oil Conversion into Bio-Fuels and Raw Chemicals: A Review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 670–689.
  30. Jo, H.; Verma, D.; Kim, J. Excellent Aging Stability of Upgraded Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil in Supercritical Ethanol. Fuel 2018, 232, 610–619.
  31. Copyrignt. In Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy and Biorefining; Holm-Nielsen, J.B.; Ehimen, E.A. (Eds.) Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; p. iv. ISBN 978-1-78242-366-9.
  32. Xiu, S.; Shahbazi, A. Bio-Oil Production and Upgrading Research: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4406–4414.
  33. Fermoso, J.; Pizarro, P.; Coronado, J.M.; Serrano, D.P. Advanced Biofuels Production by Upgrading of Pyrolysis Bio-Oil. WIREs Energy Environ. 2017, 6, e245.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback