Monetary and Fiscal Policy Sustainability: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 3 by Rita Xu and Version 2 by Rita Xu.

This rMonesearch aims to analyze thetary and fiscal policy sustainability of fiscal and monetaryhas great importance in both developed and developing countries. Both policies and the relationship between them under a fixed exchange regime that is characterized by high budget deficit and public debt in the past four decadplay an important role in achieving economic growth and sustainable development. The sustainability of both policies, in addition to the coordination between them, enables the design and implementation of efficient and effective policies.

  • Sustainability
  • Fiscal and Monetary Policies
  • Markov Switching Modelling

1. Introduction

Monetary and fiscal policy sustainability has great importance in both developed and developing countries. Both policies play an important role in achieving economic growth and sustainable development. The sustainability of both policies, in addition to the coordination between them, enables the design and implementation of efficient and effective policies. This enables investors to predict the future and implement their plans as well. The sustainability of policies leads to the stability of markets for goods and services and reduces levels of risk in predicting the future. The main policies that can be used to achieve stability in the economy with fewer vulnerabilities are fiscal and monetary, and this can happen in full coordination between them [1]. However, the exchange rate regime that a country follows can determine the nature of sustainability between both policies. For example, under a fixed exchange regime, fiscal policy dominates monetary policy in a way that benefits countries by achieving equilibrium income and an increase in trade [2]. The switch of most countries towards flexible exchange regimes led to an unsustainable relationship between the two policies. Therefore, monetary and fiscal policies need to operate independently and should cooperate in achieving mutual interests and objectives. One of the most important strengths in which fiscal and monetary policies have to be prudent and predictable is the characteristic of sustainability. Despite the different objectives of fiscal policy and monetary policy, the main and final objective of all economic policies adopted by the government is to maximize the wealth of society and improve the level of its welfare. Both fiscal and monetary policies aim to achieve this goal by attaining sustainable growth and reducing unemployment rates, in addition to achieving stability in price welfare levels and controlling inflation rates to acceptable levels [3]. The focus on achieving their goals individually and in isolation from other economic goals may lead to unsustainability and economic imbalances that prevent the implementation of the economic strategies adopted by the government. According to [4], fiscal policy is considered sustainable if the current value of the budget deficit is in line with the trend of public debt; that is, the public budget deficit in a year is determined based on the outstanding public debt in the previous year. Regarding monetary policy, it is considered to be sustainable if real interest rates respond to changes in inflation rates [5][6]. In reality, the sustainability of both policies is different and depends on the adopted exchange rate regime and the nature of coordination between the two policies [7]. According to [8], a fixed-rate regime is not sustainable, especially if it is associated with large ongoing deficits and rising debt levels. Accordingly, under a fixed exchange rate regime and limited scope to use monetary policy, the stability of the economy relies on fiscal policy. On the contrary, with a floating exchange rate, monetary policy is more effective and sustainable than fiscal policy. Since 1996, fiscal policy has been the main policy that has had an effect on the Jordanian economy, with continuous government budget deficits and increasing public debt [1]. During the study period, budget deficit and public debt evolved rapidly due to regional and international crises accompanied by an influx of refugees and population growth [9][10]. Understanding the relationship between fiscal and monetary policy in a developing country like Jordan is vital for policymakers to achieve inclusive economic growth under various exchange rate regimes.

2. Monetary and Fiscal Policy Sustainability

A sustainable fiscal policy is defined as a policy that considers the ratio of debt to GDP to converge back to its initial level [11]. Similarly, ref. [4] illustrates that sustainability is about the way fiscal policy reduces high debt values. To clarify, it is the state of ensuring that the budget deficit and public debt are at a sustainable level. Accordingly, a sustainable monetary policy refers to anchoring inflation expectations for low and stable inflation [12]. However, after the high increase in the budget deficit, public debt, inflation, and unemployment in most developing countries, it became an important issue for policymakers to look for more sustainability in fiscal and monetary policies to find solutions to the increase in these indicators and their impact on the economy. Yet, the increase in crises and shocks that face both developing and developed countries gives both fiscal and monetary policies more importance to stabilizing the economy and achieving economic and social developments through increased economic growth and reducing unemployment and poverty rates. Both policies’ objectives contribute to achieving these goals if more coordination exists between them. However, the increased budget deficit, public debt, poverty, and inflation rate call for more accommodating fiscal and monetary policies to stabilize developing countries’ economies [13][14]. This is true for countries that are more vulnerable to external shocks and suffer from imbalances in their budget and balance of payments. Ref. [15] concluded that in all cases, it is necessary to carry out major reforms to support inclusive growth with a more sustainable fiscal space. Therefore, the strength of both fiscal and monetary sustainability was at the core of achieving economic development in developing countries. Several studies found weak coordination between the monetary and fiscal policies [16][17][18]. While fiscal policy focuses on reducing unemployment rates, even if this leads to an increase in inflation rates in the economy, the monetary policy aims at controlling inflation rates without paying attention to the budget deficit. In some cases, fiscal policy is found to be the dominant monetary policy, and price instability is a result of fiscal policy measures [19][20]. The channels through which both fiscal policy and monetary policy affect economic growth are important in the context of developing countries. According to [21], the effect of monetary policy on growth moves from money supply and prices to real GDP. The economy is considered under the control of fiscal policy if the dimensions of the current and future budget and the sources of funding are controlled by the Ministry of Finance. While the economy is entitled to be under the control of monetary policy, the primary budget deficit aims to reduce borrowing, and the Central Bank does not inject more liquidity into the market [22]. Under different exchange rate regimes, achieving monetary and financial sustainability depends on the exchange rate regime adopted by the country. In some cases, countries have fixed exchange regimes with capital control. In other cases, countries have fixed exchange regimes without capital control, and finally, countries have floating exchange regimes without capital control [23].

References

  1. Luck, T. Jordan’s Syrian Refugee Economic Gamble; The Middle East Institute (MEI): Washington, DC, USA, 2016; Available online: https://www.mei.edu/publications/jordans-syrian-refugee-economic-gamble (accessed on 5 October 2021).
  2. Canale, R.R.; Mirdala, R. Fiscal and Monetary Policy in the Eurozone: Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Evidence; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2019; pp. 153–176.
  3. Horton, M.; EL-Ganainy, A. Fiscal Policy: Taking and Giving Away. Finance & Development, IMF. 2022. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/Series/Back-to-Basics/Fiscal-Policy (accessed on 9 October 2022).
  4. Bohn, H. The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in the United States. In Proceedings of the CESifo/LBI Conference on the Sustainability of Public Debt, Munich, Germany, 22–23 October 2004.
  5. Woodford, M. Inflation Targeting and Financial Stability. NBER Working Paper No. 17967. 2012. Available online: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w17967/w17967.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2022).
  6. Constâncio, V. The Future of Monetary Policy Frameworks. Presented at the Vice-President of the European Central Bank at the Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, Lisbon, Portugal, 25 May 2017.
  7. International Monetary Fund (IMF). Jordan: Evaluation Report, IMF Support to Jordan 1989–2004. 2005. Available online: https://www.imf.org/external/np/ieo/2005/jor/eng/pdf/report.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2022).
  8. Burnside, A.C.; Eichenbaum, M.S.; Rebelo, S. On the Fiscal Implications of Twin Crises. In Managing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets; Dooley, M.P., Frankel, J.A., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2003.
  9. Alshoubaki, W.; Harris, M. the impact of Syrian refugees on Jordan: A framework for analysis. J. Int. Stud. 2018, 11, 154–179.
  10. International Monetary Fund (IMF). Jordan’s Article IV Reports. 2021. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2021/08/24/Jordan-Second-Review-Under-the-Extended-Arrangement-Under-the-Extended-Fund-Facility-464551 (accessed on 17 October 2022).
  11. Blanchard, O.; Chouraqui, J.; Hagemann, R.; Sartor, N. The sustainability of Fiscal Policy: New Answers to an Old Question. OECD Economic Studies No. 15. 1990. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/tax/public-finance/34288870.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2021).
  12. Tiberto, B.P.; de Mendonça, H.F. Effects of Sustainable Monetary and Fiscal Policy on FDI Inflows to EMDE Countries; The Central Bank of Brazil: Brasilia, Brazil, 2022.
  13. Chadha, J.; Corrado, L.; Meaning, J.; Schuler, T. Monetary and Fiscal Complementarity in the COVID-19 Pandemic; Working Paper Series, No 2588; European Central Bank: Frankfurt, Germany, 2021.
  14. Borio, C.; Disyatat, P. Monetary and Fiscal Policies: In Search of a Corridor of Stability. VoxEU Column, the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). 2021. Available online: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/monetary-and-fiscal-policies-search-corridor-stability (accessed on 26 June 2022).
  15. Bhanumurthy, N.R.; Niranjan, S. A Fiscal-Monetary Interaction Model for Inclusive Growth in the Middle-Income Arab Countries: Application to Egypt’s Economy; E/ESCWA/EDID/2019/WP.14 13; Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA): Beirut, Lebanon, 2019.
  16. Adlib, Z.; Khan, A.; Ulf Has, I. The Coordination of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in Pakistan (An Empirical Analysis 1975–2011). Pak. Dev. Rev. 2012, 51, 695–704.
  17. Ng’ang’a, W.; Chevallier, J.; Ndiritu, S. Investigating Fiscal and Monetary Policies Coordination and Public Debt in Kenya: Evidence from Regime-Switching and Self-Exciting Threshold Autoregressive Models; Economics Discussion Papers No. 2019-40; Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW): Kiel, Germany, 2019.
  18. Cevik, S. Policy coordination in fiscal federalism: Drawing lessons from the Dubai debt crisis. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2019, 14, 899–915.
  19. Chuku, A. Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in Nigeria: An Application of a State-Space Model with Markov-Switching. CBN J. Appl. Stat. 2010, 1, 39–51.
  20. Panjer, N.; de Haan, L.; Jacobs, J.P. Is fiscal policy in the euro area Ricardian? Empirica 2019, 47, 411–429.
  21. Al-Sawa’i, K.; Muhammad, M. the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy in Jordan: An Econometric Analysis. Al-Manara Res. Stud. 2017, 23, 616.
  22. Sargent, T.J.; Wallace, N. Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 1981, 5, 1–15.
  23. Dai, Y. Monetary Policy and Financial Sustainability in a Two-State Open Economy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4825.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback