Factors Influencing the Viability of MSMSCFs: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Sirius Huang and Version 1 by Assed N. Haddad.

Identifying factors influencing the viability of medium, small, and micro scale construction firms (MSMSCFs) is a crucial precursor in positioning such firms to aid economic and infrastructural development, especially in developing countries.

  • medium, small and micro scale construction firms (MSMSCFs)
  • building information modelling (BIM)
  • viability

1. Introduction

BIM can be used for many different things, including project management, facilities management, design and construction integration, optimization, risk evaluation, cost estimation, scheduling, communication, coordination, and documentation [1,2,3][1][2][3]. BIM is widely regarded as a valuable tool for minimizing fragmentation in the construction sector, increasing productivity, and cutting the high costs attributed to poor interoperability [3]. BIM is both a process and a technology. BIM’s technological component aids project stakeholders in simulating the construction site and what is to be built to find any potential issues with the design, construction, and future operation. All project stakeholders’ functions are integrated through the close collaboration made possible by the BIM process component.
BIM helps with virtually all the processes involved in the construction of building structures. All facets of a building’s design, construction, use, and maintenance are covered by BIM [2,4,5,6][2][4][5][6]. Due to its potential to improve construction firm performance, BIM has been embraced by the construction industry more frequently in recent years. Although it is generally accepted that greater BIM competency will increase business performance and subsequently viability, no study has likely been able to determine which factors impacting construction firms’ viability are enhanced by the various BIM benefits.
Owing to the strategic benefits of BIM, studies have shown that large firms, especially in developed countries, are increasingly utilizing BIM technology and processes to optimize their building production capacity [7]. On the other hand, micro- and small-scale construction firms in all countries are yet to comprehend and utilize these gains in growing their construction business [7]. Identifying BIM benefit factors in factors influencing the viability of medium-, small-, and micro-scale construction firms (MSMSCFs) is a crucial precursor in positioning such firms to aid the economic and infrastructural development of developing countries. Underutilization of BIM technology is particularly poor in developing countries as there are construction professionals who are not aware of BIM and some who are still making use of traditional drawing tools or at best the popular two-dimensional computer-aided design [8].

2. Factors Influencing the Viability of MSMSCFs

Research has shown that viability in the construction contracting industry goes beyond financial profitability, even though financial profitability is a critical performance indicator that determines a company’s viability [10,11][9][10]. Factors that affect a contractor’s viability, aside from financial factors, include quality of service and work [12][11]; cash flow [13][12]; and growth and financial stability [10][9]. Numerous studies on how construction enterprises operate, forecasting failures and losses, macroeconomic policies, important success and failure criteria, and similar topics have emphasized and reached conclusions on numerous factors determining the viability of construction businesses. Numerous studies on how construction enterprises operate, forecasting failures and losses, macroeconomic policies, important success and failure criteria, and similar topics have emphazised and reached conclusions on numerous factors determining the viability of construction businesses [11,14][10][13]. Studies on construction businesses’ financial management have identified several factors that place a strong emphasis on managing the organization’s financial activities in the realization of the business’s overall strategy as well as on achieving the strategic plans and objectives of such organizations. Such factors include construction profit margin [15][14]; building construction loan accessibility [16][15]; Cash for construction work [10][9]; credit purchase of construction materials [16][15]; interest on loans [17][16]; cost of plant and equipment purchase, maintenance, and hiring [18][17]; cost of construction labor [19][18]; prompt payment of work certificates [20,21][19][20]; and cost of construction materials [22][21].
Construction firms’ success and failure are best assessed over time, according to studies on construction business evaluation and market environment, by factors such as successful tender rates and construction work turnover [23][22]; firm size [24][23]; bad weather and natural disaster [25][24]; tax [26][25]; inflation [27][26]; tendering practices [23][22]; corruption [28][27]; government policy [29][28]; the firm’s impact on the community [30][29], and the age of the operation [31][30].
Technical capability, depth, structure, and robustness are all hallmarks of technical competence in the construction industry. High-performance contractors are known for having a lot of expertise, which reduces technical risk and allows them to handle the only remaining risk that can reduce their profit. Due to their technical knowledge, they provide high quality at the lowest possible price. The technical viability of a construction firm is influenced by the following factors: specialization of construction work [32][31]; availability of skilled craftspeople [33][32]; use of cutting-edge technology in building [34][33]; technical know-how in construction [35][34]; and availability of high-performing personnel [36][35].
The significance of managerial ability and competence within the construction industry has been highlighted in studies on construction operations and company organization. Employee contentment [37][36]; credibility of good client-contractor relationships [38][37], management of construction site materials [39][38]; reliability of construction cost and time [40][39]; organizational competency customer satisfaction [35][34]; the quality of service and work [40][39]; and factors related to labor, plant, and equipment management on construction sites [41,42][40][41] were identified.
The number of accidents and fatalities in the construction sector is incredibly high around the world and construction safety has become a major concern [43][42]. When compared to other industries, the construction sector has a six-fold higher risk of workplace fatalities [43][42]. The viability of the health and safety of the construction sector is influenced by these performance factors and metrics [44][43]: accessibility to safety gear; rate of accident; and accident cost.
Recent research suggests that psychosocial- and organizational culture, professional ethics and conduct, and the COVID-19 epidemic are amidst factors influencing the viability of construction enterprises [45,46,47][44][45][46]. Psychosocial- and organizational culture have a significant impact on the growth and financial performance of construction enterprises [48][47]. To promote greater construction business performance, Goulding et al. [49][48] advocated for the integration of psychosocial diffusion indicators into the Turkish construction industry. Previously, Takim et al. [50][49] assessed psychological environmental factors in the context of private construction businesses in the event of disasters. All these studies considered various influencers of construction firms’ viability.
Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on all sectors of the local and world economy is being researched, and micro-, small-, and medium-scale enterprises (MSMEs), of which MSMSCFs are a significant part [51][50], were among the hardest hit [52][51]. Findings revealed the strategic role of digital activities in various firms’ marketing and operations to improve their performance and by implication their viability in the COVID-19 pandemic era [53][52]. Coincidentally, the drive and call for the adoption of BIM had occurred before the outbreak of the pandemic. BIM Open Source software facilitates access to a common data environment in the construction sector and it is expected to be established at the outset of the construction project, following international standards. This can aid in successful project management by giving quick insights into the performance of construction projects and by removing wasteful activities such as rework and defects [54][53]. The great benefits of the digitization of construction activities offered by the adoption of BIM can be received at no better time than now given the threats to public health. To this end, it is important to emphasize and elaborate the benefits of BIM and evaluate its place in the viability of MSMSCFs.

References

  1. Woo, J.; Wilsmann, J.; Kang, D. Use of as-built building information modeling. In Proceedings of the Construction 1 Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice 2010, Banff, AB, Canada, 8–10 May 2010; pp. 538–548.
  2. Azhar, S. Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 2011, 11, 241–252.
  3. Eastman, C.; Teicholz, P.; Sacks, R.; Liston, K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 2, pp. 147–150.
  4. Meadati, P. BIM extension into later stages of project life cycle. In Proceedings of the Associated Schools of Construction 45th Annual International Conference, Gainesville, FL, USA, 1–4 April 2009; pp. 121–129.
  5. Getuli, V.; Ventura, S.M.; Capone, P.; Ciribini, A.L. BIM-based code checking for construction health and safety. Procedia Eng. 2017, 196, 454–461.
  6. Olugboyega, O.; Windapo, A. Framework for managing BIM benefits: A benefits breakdown hierarchy approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference: 10th SACQSP International Research Conference, Johannesburg, South Africa, 30 September–1 October 2018; pp. 68–82.
  7. Cheng, Y.M. Building Information Modeling for Quality Management. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2018), Funchal, Portugal, 21–24 March 2018; pp. 351–358.
  8. Sistani, N.S.; Rezaei, A. BIM implementation in developing countries. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Ankara, Turkey, 17–19 October 2012.
  9. Makori, D.M.; Jagongo, A. Working capital management and firm profitability: Empirical evidence from manufacturing and construction firms listed on Nairobi securities exchange, Kenya. Int. J. Account. Tax. 2013, 1, 1–4.
  10. Hany Abd Elshakour, M.A.; Al-Sulaihi, I.A.; Al-Gahtani, K.S. Indicators for measuring performance of building construction companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 2013, 25, 125–134.
  11. Leong, T.K.; Zakuan, N.; Saman, M.Z.M.; Ariff, M.S.M.; Tan, C.S. Using project performance to measure effectiveness of quality management system maintenance and practices in construction industry. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 591361.
  12. Oladimeji, O.; Aina, O.O. Cash flow management techniques practices of local firms in Nigeria. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2021, 21, 395–403.
  13. Oladimeji, O.; Aina, O.O. Financial performance of locally owned construction firms in southwestern Nigeria. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2018, 23, 112–128.
  14. Ho, P.H. Analysis of competitive environments, business strategies, and performance in Hong Kong’s construction industry. J. Manag. Eng. 2016, 32, 04015044.
  15. Peterson, S.J. Construction Accounting and Financial Management; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2013.
  16. Harymawan, I. Why do firms appoint former military personnel as directors? Evidence of loan interest rate in militarily connected firms in Indonesia. Asian Rev. Account. 2018, 26, 2–18.
  17. Peurifoy, R.L.; Schexnayder, C.J. Construction Planning, Equipment, and Methods; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  18. El-Gohary, K.M.; Aziz, R.F. Factors influencing construction labor productivity in Egypt. J. Manag. Eng. 2014, 30, 1–9.
  19. Badroldin, M.K.; Hamid, A.R.; Raman, S.A.; Zakaria, R.; Mohandes, S.R. Late payment practices in the Malaysian construction industry. Malays. J. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 149–162.
  20. Haron, R.C.; Arazmi, A.L. Late payment issues of subcontractors in Malaysian construction industry. Plan. Malays. 2020, 18.
  21. Wahab, A.B.; Lawal, A.F. An evaluation of waste control measures in construction industry in Nigeria. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 5, 246–254.
  22. El-khalek, H.A.; Aziz, R.F.; Morgan, E.S. Identification of construction subcontractor prequalification evaluation criteria and their impact on project success. Alex. Eng. J. 2019, 58, 217–223.
  23. Ozcan, I.S.; Unal, E.A.; Yener, U.N. The effect of firm size on profitability: Evidence from Turkish manufacturing sector. J. Bus. Econ. Financ. 2017, 6, 301–308.
  24. Akomah, B.B.; Jackson, E.N. Contractors Perception of Factors Contributing to Road Project Delay. Int. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2016, 5, 79–85.
  25. Matarirano, O.; Makina, D.; Chiloane-Tsoka, G.E. Tax compliance costs and small business performance: Evidence from the South African construction industry. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 50, 9.
  26. Jaya, I.; Alaloul, W.S.; Musarat, M.A. Role of inflation in construction: A systematic review. In ICCOEE2020: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE2020); Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 701–708.
  27. Boudreaux, C.J.; Nikolaev, B.N.; Holcombe, R.G. Corruption and destructive entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 2018, 51, 181–202.
  28. Deng, X.; Pheng, L.S. Understanding the critical variables affecting the level of political risks in international construction projects. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2013, 17, 895–907.
  29. Bala, K.; Bello, A.; Kolo, B.A.; Bustani, S.A. Factors inhibiting the growth of local construction firms in Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 25th ARCOM Conference, Nottingham, UK, 7–9 September 2009; pp. 351–359.
  30. LiPuma, J.A.; Newbert, S.L.; Doh, J.P. The effect of institutional quality on firm export performance in emerging economies: A contingency model of firm age and size. Small Bus. Econ. 2013, 40, 817–841.
  31. Sundquist, V.; Gadde, L.E.; Hulthén, K. Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2018, 36, 49–65.
  32. Oke, A.; Aigbavboa, C.; Khangale, T. Effect of skills shortage on sustainable construction. In Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure, Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure, 17–21 July 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 303–309.
  33. Zhong, R.Y.; Peng, Y.; Xue, F.; Fang, J.; Zou, W.; Luo, H.; Ng, S.T.; Lu, W.; Shen, G.Q.; Huang, G.Q. Prefabricated construction enabled by the Internet-of-Things. Autom. Constr. 2017, 76, 59–70.
  34. Lawson, M.; Ogden, R.; Goodier, C. Design in Modular Construction; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014.
  35. Ramírez, R.R.; Alarcón, L.F.; Knights, P. Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry. J. Manag. Eng. 2004, 20, 110–117.
  36. Nudurupati, S.; Arshad, T.; Turner, T. Performance measurement in the construction industry: An action case investigating manufacturing methodologies. Computers in Industry. Comput. Ind. 2007, 58, 667–676.
  37. Chinyio, E.A.; Olomolaiye, P.O.; Kometa, S.T.; Harris, F.C. A needs-based methodology for classifying construction clients and selecting contractors. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1998, 16, 91–98.
  38. Gulghane, A.A.; Khandve, P.V. Management for construction materials and control of construction waste in construction industry: A review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2015, 5, 59–64.
  39. Aje, O.I.; Odusami, K.T.; Ogunsemi, D.R. The impact of contractors’ management capability on cost and time performance of construction projects in Nigeria. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2009, 14, 171–187.
  40. Alaghbari, W.; Al-Sakkaf, A.A.; Sultan, B. Factors affecting construction labour productivity in Yemen. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2019, 19, 79–91.
  41. Parchami Jalal, M.; Shoar, S. A hybrid framework to model factors affecting construction labour productivity: Case study of Iran. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2019, 24, 630–654.
  42. Liang, K.; Fung, I.W. The impact of macroeconomic and industrial fluctuation on fatalities of construction workers in China. J. Saf. Res. 2019, 70, 149–158.
  43. Onyebeke, L.C.; Papazaharias, D.M.; Freund, A.; Dropkin, J.; McCann, M.; Sanchez, S.H.; Hashim, D.; Meyer, J.D.; Lucchini, R.G.; Zuckerman, N.C. Access to properly fitting personal protective equipment for female construction workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2016, 59, 1032–1040.
  44. Oladimeji, O. Factors influencing professionalism and the viability of local firms in Nigeria. Acta Structilia 2019, 26, 104–136.
  45. Oladimeji, O. Psychosocial construction work and wellbeing in the viability of indigenous construction firms. J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag. 2020, 10, 187–199.
  46. Oladimeji, O. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on local construction firms’ viability. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2022, 20, 201–221.
  47. Lenin, J.N. Guest editorial on special issue: Psychosocial and Organisational-Cultural influences on Construction Stakeholders’ Financial Performance. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2018, 23, 2–5.
  48. Goulding, J.S.; Ezcan, V.; Sutrisna, M. Securing the embededness of psychosocial diffusion indicators into the Turkish construction industry: Silence is no longer golden. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2018, 23, 90–111.
  49. Takim, R.; Abu Talib, I.F.; Nawawi, A.H. Quality of life: Psychosocial environment factors (PEF) in the event of disasters to private construction firms. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 234, 28–35.
  50. European Commission 2015. Enterprises and Industry: SME Definition, Archived from the Original on Available 8 February. Available online: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enterprisepolicy/smedefinition/index.htm (accessed on 29 May 2017).
  51. Ahmad, I. COVID-19 and Labour Law: Pakistan Italian Labour Law. E-J. 2020, 1, 1–11.
  52. Zamani, H.; Rahman, R.A.; Fauzi, M.A.; Yusofs, I.M. Effects of COVID-19 on building construction projects: Impact and response mechanism, 4th National Conference on Wind and Earhquake Engineering. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 682, 012049.
  53. Özkan, S.; Seyis, S. Identification of common data environment functions during construction phase of BIM-based projects. In Proceedings of the CIB W78-LDAC 2021, Luxembourg, 11–15 October 2021.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback