The Therapeutic Imagery of the Coastal Zone: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Lindsay Dong and Version 1 by Shuchen Tsai.

Research has shown the therapeutic benefits of coastal restoration, including physiological, mental-emotional, and creativity-related benefits. The coastal zone is also regarded as a daily therapeutic space, where the frequency of visiting blue spaces is positively correlated with psychological well-being, happiness, and physical activity levels.

  • coast
  • human geography
  • therapeutic landscapes

1. Introduction

Early researchers proposed that the environment can contribute to the health benefits of individuals and society by reducing stress, alleviating anxiety, and reducing feelings of fear [1,2,3][1][2][3]. Even just taking walks in natural environments has been found to be beneficial for health [4].
However, since Geslers [5,6][5][6] proposed the study of therapeutic landscapes, it has directed a new topic for the study of medical geography: why are certain places or situations considered therapeutic? There have been a number of studies exploring the healing and health-enhancing dimensions of places [7]. Following Gesler’s work, researchers have recognized the importance of maintaining health and well-being, which extends far beyond healing experiences. “The themes of therapeutic landscape include man-environment relationships; humanist concepts such as sense of place and symbolic landscapes” [5]. Moreover, what matters more is the quality of the relationship between therapeutic landscapes and the individual’s experience [7]. This shift acknowledges that places inherently do not possess healing properties; instead, it is through the dynamic interaction between individuals and their environment that opportunities for health and well-being are generated [8].
In recent years, there has been significant progress in the research on therapeutic landscapes within the physical, social, and symbolic dimensions, particularly regarding “nature-based” therapeutic encounters [7]. Notably, there has been fruitful exploration of sensory responses to the environment, with a focus on engaging with the processes and temporalities of intimate, visceral place sensing [9]. “Nature-based” therapeutic encounters view the body as an instrument for perceiving and sensing the social environment, rather than merely as a container.
Currently, research on environmental healing tends to focus on green landscapes (for example, parks, green spaces, forests, mountains, and even virtual green spaces [14,15,16,17][10][11][12][13]), and quantitative indicators are predominantly used. This approach can be considered a “symptom-oriented” method, where specific themed healing environments such as hot springs and forests (distinct from everyday living spaces) provide possibilities for users to temporarily escape emotionally stimulating situations [18,19][14][15]. While these environments can achieve immediate physiological stress reduction (as measured by indicators) [14[10][15][16][17][18][19],19,20,21,22,23], the long-term healing effects remain unknown, as most studies only involve one [14,15,22,23][10][11][18][19]. Although significant, the effects were observed only in the short term, highlighting the limitation of capturing cross-sectional data and virtual experiences [15][11]. It is important to discuss the possibility that participants may experience short-term negative emotional displacement due to the enchanting scenery, and this should be considered from different perspectives.

2. The Therapeutic Imagery of the Coastal Zone

The cultural interpretation of the coast is constantly evolving, from its enjoyment amongst the Ancient Greeks and Romans as a place of pleasure and beauty [28][20]. And then, the ocean is also filled with fear. The sea has been associated with various metaphors of rage and symbolizes various wild and untamed creatures. “The ocean dances with a mane of lions; the sea spray is likened to “the drool of sea monsters” and is said to cling to their claws” [29][21]. Human geographers have focused more precisely on the coastal zone. The characteristics of concave coasts evoke a sense of safety, while the expansive horizon stimulates human adventurous desires. Especially throughout the 19th century, the coastal zone provided happiness and health to humans, with its value surpassing its economic output [32][22]. It was only after people recognized the health benefits of sea bathing that health enthusiasts turned their attention to the coast, shifting from thermal springs [33,34][23][24]. The coastal zone has also served as an environment for sustenance, learning, and the earliest human habitats [35][25]. Cultural geographers [31][26] have commented on the potential of the coast to “generate a palpable intensity of feeling” [36][27]. Research has shown the therapeutic benefits of coastal restoration [37][28], including physiological, mental-emotional, and creativity-related benefits [38,39,40][29][30][31]. The coastal zone is also regarded as a daily therapeutic space [28][20], where the frequency of visiting blue spaces is positively correlated with psychological well-being, happiness, and physical activity levels [41][32]. Moreover, interactions with the coast often involve enduring connections [28][20]. Studies have also shown that emotional attachments formed in everyday life in the coastal zone can lead to a profound understanding of the interests at stake in local development and inspire actions to play a role [42][33]. Since the 19th century, the coastal zone has seemingly become synonymous with holidays and leisure, leading to the neglect of its significance as a daily living space for local residents. Therefore, the therapeutic landscape of the coastal zone is lacking in previous studies to separate the recreational components. Furthermore, compared to green spaces such as mountains, forests, parks, and gardens, the therapeutic landscape of the coastal zone has received less attention from the academic community [28][20]. However, within the broader literature, the coast has been conceptualized as a “therapeutic landscape” [8,9,43][8][9][34].

Sense and Memory of Previous Experience

People experience the world in terms of how they can act—in terms of their effectivities or action capability [44][35]. A percept may be considered to be the mental image of the external environment, and it is clearly based on two kinds of information: input from the senses and memory of previous experience [45][36]. Following the ecological viewpoint that human beings seek survival in the environment, for Gibson [46][37], senses adapt to the environment due to continuous evolution, and the sensory nervous system picks up information and forms perception. Meanwhile, invisibility, adjusting sensory input, selective attention, and other perceptual activities can make information an effective stimulus and create environmental affordances [46][37]. Therefore, the key point is how to pick up senses and memories of previous experience in people’s daily life activities in coastal areas. According to the word definition of sense, sense is an ability to understand, recognize, value, or react to something, especially any of the five physical abilities to see, hear, smell, taste, and feel [47][38]. However, only kinaesthesia (muscle movement) perception, vision, and touch can make human beings have a strong sense of space and space quality, and movements are the basis of the awareness of space [48][39]. It is pointed out that primates can improve the quality of perception through the extension and refinement of motor investigation, and the evolution of vision is an important basis for animal evolution. Animals can understand the surrounding environment well so that they can control the environment for their own direct interests; visual, somatic sensory, and auditory inputs will be analyzed and integrated with the motor and proprioceptive patterns [45][36]. People’s feelings are not formed by individuals but by long-term memories and expected results of many experiences. “in English, “I see”, means “I understand”” [48][39]. Seeing has a kind of recogninized, which includes a selective and creative process. Taste activities are related to touch and smell. For example, licking a candy will find the shape of the candy and the taste of caramel. From the previous examples, it can be inferred that people use their senses to send complex commands to the life world [48][39]. Therefore, visit frequency is the intersection of space and behavior, and it is also one of the methods to continuously filter environmental information; on the one hand, it is selected, and on the other hand, it is constructed. Memory is very important, as it is not only an experience record of an event but also a generalization of spatial relations. We can get the information in the environment from the results of manipulating objects, and generalization can deepen and extend these spatial relations indefinitely [45][36]. The time factor can exert a greater generalization effect. It is pointed out that the environment under the influence of time is not just a three-dimensional pattern, but primates can perceive it as an “assemblage of objects” [45][36]. The perceptual process formed by the interaction between people and the environment is the core of environmental behavior. The environment provides information to stimulate the senses, and perception is the result of people’s filtering of environmental information [49][40]. The course of perception cannot separate people from the environment because what people do in the environment determines perception [50][41]. The research on coastal communities points out that public participation can be an effective way to deal with environmental issues; the degree of participation is an important indicator, and frequency is usually the primary factor [51,52][42][43]. However, there is more information behind the frequency, such as residence time and activity type, which can obtain the interaction between people and the environment [53][44]. Tourists are different from residents. The characteristic of tourists is to constantly seek new places, and in the new environment, they will lack some sensory support. Therefore, they always think that “vacation areas, however delightful, seem unreal after a time” [48][39]. Therefore, in the study of cultural tourism, the frequency of use is regarded as the primary factor to verify the authenticity [54][45]. In contrast, the awareness of local residents is very important to the decision making of surrounding environment development, and only the participation of residents can make sustainable development possible [52][43]. People know the neighborhood very well, and even if the frequency of visits is low, it is possible to consciously and theoretically gather places into a spatial relationship [48][39]. On the other hand, Gesler notes that “what is therapeutic must be seen in the context of social and economic conditions and changes” [55][46]. Durling period of the COVID-19 pandemic, which occurred between 2020 and 2022, has indeed brought about changes in the relationship between individuals and spaces. The experience of lockdown has made people more aware of their connection with nature [56,57][47][48]. Studies on lockdown during the pandemic have indicated that the absence of interactions with the coastal zone can disrupt the imagery of home [58][49]. “Place is a special kind of object. It is a concretion of value, though not a valued thing that can be handled or carried about easily; it is an object in which one can dwell” [48][39]. The imagery of home serves as a sanctuary, a place of healing, regardless of one’s physical location. However, understanding how individuals establish a sense of home and emotional connection with the coastal zone is a crucial aspect to consider. Whether it is abstract or concrete symbols, it is the significance for human beings to use it to express meaning [5], as cultural values, social behavior, and individual actions worked upon particular localities over a span of time [59][50]. The cultural landscape can be viewed as a product of symbolic action; it reveals structures or represents cultural images [60,61,62][51][52][53]. There is too much of the accepted pattern of daily living to warrant reflective thought. In particular, untoward events will force us to reflect [48][39]. For example, the aforementioned COVID-19 virus infection, unpredictable risks, and troublesome experiences often lead to physical and mental troubles, such as anxiety, depression, memory loss, or stress [63,64,65,66,67,68][54][55][56][57][58][59]. Such special experiences will lead to reflection [69[60][61][62][63],70,71,72], event memory [73[64][65],74], and behavioral changes [75,76][66][67]. Human geographers and psychologists pay great attention to the interaction between people and the environment. No matter whether the words used are movements, acts, visits, or investigations, they are all seeking to adapt to the environment. The behavior change formed by reflection and memory from special experiences is characterized by the interaction between people and the environment. Under the stimulation of environmental behavior, people consciously pick up the landscape elements in the coastal zone to form a sense of place and a symbolic landscape with affordances; after a new spatial relationship is assembled, it becomes a therapeutic landscape and comes back to heal the wounds caused by the untoward event.

References

  1. Ulrich, R.S.; Simons, R.F.; Losito, B.D.; Fiorito, E.; Miles, M.A.; Zeleson, M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 1991, 11, 201–230.
  2. Ulrich, R.S. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landsc. Res. 1979, 4, 17–23.
  3. Ulrich, R.S. Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav. 1981, 13, 523–556.
  4. Gidlow, C.J.; Jones, M.V.; Hurst, G.; Masterson, D.; Clark-Carter, D.; Tarvainen, M.P.; Smith, G.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M. Where to put your best foot forward: Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 22–29.
  5. Gesler, W.M. Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Soc. Sci. Med. 1992, 34, 735–746.
  6. Gesler, W.M. Therapeutic landscapes: Theory and a case study of Epidauros, Greece. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 1993, 11, 171–189.
  7. Conradson, D. Landscape, care and the relational self: Therapeutic encounters in rural England. Health Place 2005, 11, 337–348.
  8. Bell, S.L.; Foley, R.; Houghton, F.; Maddrell, A.; Williams, A.M. From therapeutic landscapes to healthy spaces, places and practices: A scoping review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018, 196, 123–130.
  9. Bell, S.L.; Hickman, C.; Houghton, F. From therapeutic landscape to therapeutic ‘sensescape’ experiences with nature? A scoping review. Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023, 4, 100126.
  10. Yu, C.-P.; Lee, H.-Y.; Luo, X.-Y. The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 35, 106–114.
  11. Zabini, F.; Albanese, L.; Becheri, F.; Gavazzi, G.; Giganti, F.; Giovanelli, F.; Gronchi, G.; Guazzini, A.; Laurino, M.; Li, Q.; et al. Comparative Study of the Restorative Effects of Forest and Urban Videos during COVID-19 Lockdown: Intrinsic and Benchmark Values. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8011.
  12. Mohamad Yahaya, N.A.; Awang Rambli, D.R.; Sulaiman, S.; Merienne, F.; Alyan, E. Design of Game-Based Virtual Forests for Psychological Stress Therapy. Forests 2023, 14, 288.
  13. Syed Abdullah, S.S.; Awang Rambli, D.R.; Sulaiman, S.; Alyan, E.; Merienne, F.; Diyana, N. The Impact of Virtual Nature Therapy on Stress Responses: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Forests 2021, 12, 1776.
  14. Rajoo, K.S.; Karam, D.S.; Abdullah, M.Z. The physiological and psychosocial effects of forest therapy: A systematic review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 54, 126744.
  15. Yu, C.-P.; Hsieh, H. Beyond restorative benefits: Evaluating the effect of forest therapy on creativity. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 51, 126670.
  16. Lee, J.; Tsunetsugu, Y.; Takayama, N.; Park, B.-J.; Li, Q.; Song, C.; Komatsu, M.; Ikei, H.; Tyrväinen, L.; Kagawa, T.; et al. Influence of Forest Therapy on Cardiovascular Relaxation in Young Adults. Evid. -Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 834360.
  17. Chae, Y.; Lee, S.; Jo, Y.; Kang, S.; Park, S.; Kang, H. The Effects of Forest Therapy on Immune Function. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8440.
  18. Lee, S.-H.; Chu, Y.-C.; Kung, P.-C. Taiwan’s forest from environmental protection to well-being: The relationship between ecosystem services and health promotion. Forests 2022, 13, 709.
  19. Yu, C.-P.; Lin, C.-M.; Tsai, M.-J.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-Y. Effects of Short Forest Bathing Program on Autonomic Nervous System Activity and Mood States in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 897.
  20. Bell, S.L.; Phoenix, C.; Lovell, R.; Wheeler, B.W. Seeking everyday wellbeing: The coast as a therapeutic landscape. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015, 142, 56–67.
  21. Bachelard, G. Water and Dreams; The Dallas Institute of Humanities and Culture: Dallas, TX, USA, 1983.
  22. Tuan, Y.-F. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values; The Commercial Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  23. Gilbert, E.W. The growth of Inland and seaside health resorts in England1. Scott. Geogr. Mag. 1939, 55, 16–35.
  24. Gilbert, E.W. The Holiday Industry and Seaside Towns in England and Wales. In Festschrift Leopold G Scheidl zum 60 Geburtstag; Baumgartner, H., Ed.; Ferdinand Berger & Söhne OHG: Wien, Austria, 1965.
  25. Sauer, C.O. Seashore-Primitive Home of Man? Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1962, 106, 41–47.
  26. Game, A.; Metcalfe, A. ‘My corner of the world’: Bachelard and Bondi Beach. Emot. Space Soc. 2011, 4, 42–50.
  27. Ryan, A. Where Land Meets Sea: Coastal Explorations of Landscape, Representation and Spatial Experience; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2016.
  28. Doody, J.P. Coastal Conservation and Management: An Ecological Perspective; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001.
  29. Charlier, R.H.; Chaineux, M.-C.P. The healing sea: A sustainable coastal ocean resource: Thalassotherapy. J. Coast. Res. 2009, 25, 838–856.
  30. Glass-Coffin, B. Discourse, daño, and healing in north coastal Peru. Med. Anthropol. 1991, 13, 33–55.
  31. Erdtsieck, J.J. In the Spirit of Uganga: Inspired Healing and Healership in Tanzania; Universiteit van Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003.
  32. Gascon, M.; Zijlema, W.; Vert, C.; White, M.P.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2017, 220, 1207–1221.
  33. Kearns, R.; Collins, D. Feeling for the coast: The place of emotion in resistance to residential development. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2012, 13, 937–955.
  34. Jiang, S. Therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens: A review of Chinese literature in relation to the studies in western countries. Front. Archit. Res. 2014, 3, 141–153.
  35. Shaw, R. Ecological psychology: The consequence of a commitment to realism. In Cognition and the Symbolic Processes; Weimer, W., Palermo, D., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1974; pp. 159–226.
  36. Campbell, B. Human Evolution: An Introduction to Man’s Adaptations, 3rd ed.; Aldine Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 2017.
  37. Gibson, J.J. The Theory of Affordances. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, 3rd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, London, UK, 1979; pp. 56–60.
  38. Cambridge University. Cambridge Dictionary: Cambridge University Press and Assessment 2023. 2023. Available online: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ (accessed on 18 July 2023).
  39. Tuan, Y.-F. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience, 3rd ed.; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2003.
  40. McAndrew, F.T. Environmental Psychology; Wu-Nan Book Inc.: Taipei, China, 2020.
  41. Ittelson, W.H.; Franck, K.A.; O’Hanlon, T.J. The nature of environmental experience. In Experiencing the Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1976; pp. 187–206.
  42. Tran, K. Public perception of development issues: Public awareness can contribute to sustainable development of a small island. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2006, 49, 367–383.
  43. Tran, K.C.; Euan, J.; Isla, M.L. Public perception of development issues: Impact of water pollution on a small coastal community. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2002, 45, 405–420.
  44. Lin, J.-Y.; Liaw, S.-C. Improvement and Management of Stream Corridors in the Yi-Lan River: Analysis of Environmental Perveption. J. Chin. Soil Water Conserv. 2006, 37, 291–304.
  45. Lin, L.-F.; Huang, G.-H.; Wang, Y. Research on the Evaluation System of the Authenticity of Ethnic Cultural Tourism Products Based on Factor Analysis. Hum. Geogr. 2010, 25, 39–43.
  46. Gesler, W. Therapeutic landscapes: An evolving theme. Health Place 2005, 11, 295–297.
  47. Doughty, K.; Hu, H.; Smit, J. Therapeutic landscapes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Increased and intensified interactions with nature. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2022, 24, 661–679.
  48. Olszewska-Guizzo, A.; Fogel, A.; Escoffier, N.; Ho, R. Effects of COVID-19-related stay-at-home order on neuropsychophysiological response to urban spaces: Beneficial role of exposure to nature? J. Environ. Psychol. 2021, 75, 101590.
  49. Jellard, S.; Bell, S.L. A fragmented sense of home: Reconfiguring therapeutic coastal encounters in COVID-19 times. Emot. Space Soc. 2021, 40, 100818.
  50. Meinig, D.W. Introduction. In The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes; Meinig, D.W., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 1–7.
  51. Rowntree, L.B.; Conkey, M.W. Symbolism and the cultural landscape. Ann. Ass. Am. Geog. 1980, 70, 459–474.
  52. Cosgrove, D.; Daniels, S. Introduction: Iconography and landscape. In The Iconography of Landscapes; Cosgrove, D., Daniels, S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 1–10.
  53. Wagner, P.L. The themes of cultural geography rethought. Yearb. Assoc. Pac. Coast Geogr. 1975, 37, 7–14.
  54. Fountoulakis, K.N.; Apostolidou, M.K.; Atsiova, M.B.; Filippidou, A.K.; Florou, A.K.; Gousiou, D.S.; Katsara, A.R.; Mantzari, S.N.; Padouva-Markoulaki, M.; Papatriantafyllou, E.I.; et al. Self-reported changes in anxiety, depression and suicidality during the COVID-19 lockdown in Greece. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 279, 624–629.
  55. Peteet, J.R. COVID-19 anxiety. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2203–2204.
  56. Rehman, U.; Shahnawaz, M.G.; Khan, N.H.; Kharshiing, K.D.; Khursheed, M.; Gupta, K.; Kashyap, D.; Uniyal, R. Depression, anxiety and stress among Indians in times of Covid-19 lockdown. Community Ment. Health J. 2021, 57, 42–48.
  57. Dettmann, L.M.; Adams, S.; Taylor, G. Investigating the prevalence of anxiety and depression during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2022, 61, 757–780.
  58. Albagmi, F.M.; AlNujaidi, H.Y.; Al Shawan, D.S. Anxiety levels amid the COVID-19 lockdown in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 2161–2170.
  59. Bakker, E.D.; van der Pas, S.L.; Zwan, M.D.; Gillissen, F.; Bouwman, F.H.; Scheltens, P.; van der Flier, W.M.; van Maurik, I.S. Steeper memory decline after COVID-19 lockdown measures. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2023, 15, 1–9.
  60. Radka, K.; Wyeth, E.H.; Derrett, S. A qualitative study of living through the first New Zealand COVID-19 lockdown: Affordances, positive outcomes, and reflections. Prev. Med. Rep. 2022, 26, 101725.
  61. Gualano, M.R.; Lo Moro, G.; Voglino, G.; Bert, F.; Siliquini, R. Monitoring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: A public health challenge? Reflection on Italian data. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2021, 56, 165–167.
  62. Chirisa, I.; Mavhima, B.; Nyevera, T.; Chigudu, A.; Makochekanwa, A.; Matai, J.; Masunda, T.; Chandaengerwa, E.K.; Machingura, F.; Moyo, S.; et al. The impact and implications of COVID-19: Reflections on the Zimbabwean society. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2021, 4, 100183.
  63. Chaudhary, M.; Sodani, P.; Das, S. Effect of COVID-19 on economy in India: Some reflections for policy and programme. J. Health Manag. 2020, 22, 169–180.
  64. Adams, T.; Kopelman, S. Remembering COVID-19: Memory, crisis, and social media. Media Cult. Soc. 2022, 44, 266–285.
  65. Herrmann, D.; Oudman, E.; Postma, A. The era of our lives: The memory of Korsakoff patients for the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in the Netherlands. Conscious. Cogn. 2023, 107, 103454.
  66. Bai, H. A critical reflection on environmental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Philos. Educ. 2020, 54, 916–926.
  67. Mollica, R.F.; Fernando, D.B.; Augusterfer, E.F. Beyond Burnout: Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic Challenges to Self-Care. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2021, 23, 21.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback