5. The Course of HLH in Pregnant and Postpartum Women
Pregnancy is a physiological process, and the HLH syndrome is rarely diagnosed in pregnant women. Cytotoxic T cells, macrophages and NK cells play an essential role in HLH. Excessive activation and proliferation of T-cells and macrophages, and secretion of large amounts of cytokines, may be responsible for multiple organ failure, including the liver, brain and bone marrow, which can be potentially fatal [47][25]. The levels of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ increase in HLH [48][26].
In order to diagnose HLH, either molecular diagnostics consistent with HLH must be performed or five of the eight diagnostic criteria for HLH must be fulfilled, i.e., splenomegaly, fever, cytopenia (affecting two or more of three lineages in the peripheral blood), hypofibrinogenaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia, elevated levels of ferritin, haemophagocytosis in the bone marrow/spleen/lymph nodes, low or absent NK cell activity and increased levels of soluble CD25 (interleukin [IL]-2 receptor), or both [26][27].
HLH in the group of pregnant and postpartum women accounts for high morbidity and mortality among them. Therefore, effective treatment is needed in order to reduce mortality and prevent ICU admission in this population. For this reason, it is important to diagnose the disease timely and implement appropriate treatment promptly. No treatment scheme has been developed for pregnant women so far. However, the HLH-2004 protocol is usually used at the beginning of treatment. The protocol includes therapy with dexamethasone 10 mg/m
2 daily, etoposide 150 mg/m
2 twice a week and cyclosporine, followed by dexamethasone intravenous pulses
[54][28]. Steroids are used as the first line of treatment. The use of etoposide, which is a potential teratogenic drug, is controversial in the case of pregnant women. Etoposide might also induce secondary malignancies, especially acute myeloid leukaemia (the risk is estimated at 0.3 to 0.4%)
[55][29]. For these reasons, it is better to use steroids as the first line therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins or cyclosporine in steroids-resistant patients
[21,26][15][27]. If the central nervous system is affected, intrathecal methotrexate infusions can be used
[54][28].
6. Associations between HLH and COVID-19
Recently, some similarity has been noticed between moderate and severe COVID-19 and HLH (Table 1).
Table 1. Moderately severe to severe COVID-19 as a form of sHLH. sHLH—secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; COVID-19—coronavirus disease 2019; HLH—haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; IL-6—interleukin 6.
Moderately Severe to Severe COVID-19 |
sHLH |
prevalence in pregnant women—rarely diagnosed |
aetiology |
viral infection |
viral infection in most cases |
hyperferritinaemia |
marker of poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients |
the most characteristic laboratory result of HLH |
treatment |
treatment aimed at suppressing the cytokine storm |
high mortality |
increased levels of IL-6 |
Treatment of patients with the severe course of COVID-19 is difficult because the only treatment option available for ARDS is symptomatic treatment. The HLH-2004 protocol has been successfully used in HLH triggered by EBV, HBV and influenza A virus subtype (A/H1N1) infections
[55][29]. These observations suggest that this therapy could be effective in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with the severe course of the disease.
It is noteworthy that many of the criteria used to diagnose HLH are described as COVID-19 mortality predictors
[56][30]. A relationship has been observed between the median time from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms to ARDS (which was 8.0–14.0 days) and HLH development during A/H1N1 infection. Hamizi et al. suggest that moderately severe to severe COVID-19 might be a form of sHLH
[56][30]. A cytokine storm has been reported in the ICU patients suffering from SARS-CoV-2 infection
[57][31].
However, some research suggests that the use of HScore to identify the COVID-19 cytokine storm is of limited value
[59,60][32][33].
Treatment with etoposide and dexamethasone is aimed at suppressing the cytokine storm, and therefore, it may be potentially effective in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. It has been shown that etoposide removes activated T lymphocytes and effectively suppresses a cytokine storm. However, no direct anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages or dendritic cells and no deletion of quiescent naive or memory T cells have been reported. Despite the risks associated with administration of etoposide, it could reduce mortality and the nervous system complications in patients with the severe course of COVID-19
[56][30]. It is noteworthy that in the case of sHLH and sepsis, mortality is very high (66.7%)
[61][34]. The sHLH occurs in 3.7–4.3% of sepsis cases
[15][35]. Thus, its use in pregnant women in interdisciplinary teams should be carefully considered.
Severe COVID-19 cases may benefit from the IL-6 pathway inhibition, given the associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and sHLH-like serum cytokine elevations. The level of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as IL-1a/β, IP-10, MCP-1 is increased as well. Severe cases show elevation of TNFα, IL-1, IL-6, IL-18, IL-8, IL-10, MCP-1 and MIP-1A, which can lead to serious pulmonary tissue damage. Additionally, IL-1 has also been linked to the expression of thromboxane-A2 in COVID-19 patients, and as a result, platelet activation and aggregation are increased, which enhances the risk of thrombus development
[63][36]. Therapeutics based on suppressing CRS, such as tocilizumab, enter clinical trials before they are ready to fight COVID-19
[20][14]. The immediate goal of IL-6 antagonism is to ameliorate severe COVID-19 cases so that requirements for advanced care are minimised
[13][37].
7. Conclusions
The complicated phenomenon of maternal immunological tolerance to foetal antigens enables the development of an antigenically foreign foetus in the uterus despite the existence of the maternal immune system capable of rejection. The maternal immune T-cell profile shifts from the Th1 dominance to the Th2 dominance. Pregnant women are more susceptible to infections, and viral infections may be very dangerous for them. It is important to clarify whether the cytokine storm present in the context of pregnancy promotes the development of HLH.
Pregnant women are more susceptible to infections, and viral infections may be very dangerous for them. The severity of the viral infection may be dependent on existing comorbidities as well (asthma, gestation diabetes, obesity). The severity of COVID-19 disease is an indication for cesarean section because of possible respiratory complications. Even though the mechanism of COVID-19 is not fully understood, a cytokine storm is held accountable for a more severe course of the disease. COVID-19 patients are reported to have frequently shown abnormal laboratory test results indicative of a cytokine storm, including elevated levels of serum ferritin and IL-6, which makes it possible to diagnose HLH as well. The major feature of HLH is hyperferritinaemia, which is also correlated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients. SARS-CoV-2 infection can be a trigger of the disorder, but not all patients suffering from COVID-19 develop HLH. The relationship between HLH and COVID-19 involves mortality predictors for COVID-19, used as criteria to diagnose HLH. The HLH disorder is rare and difficult to diagnose; however, its early detection could reduce patient mortality.