About 1% of the world's human population lives permanently at >2500 m altitudes, mainly in non-Western countries
[1]. The major health problem these people constantly face stems from breathing an atmosphere impoverished in oxygen (O
2). On average, up to 10% of the population living at altitude develop diseases linked to insufficient O
2 or hypoxia
[2]. Hypoxia may occur even at sea level, contributing to morbidity and mortality in numberless patients with acute respiratory diseases (ARDS), chronic pulmonary diseases (COPD), emphysema, lung tumors, anemia, heart failure, and hundreds of other disorders that stem from unmatched O
2 supply with respect to needs. Such diseases take an intolerable toll on humanity in terms of sufferance, life loss, and economic distress: the burden imposed in one single year (2010) in the US only by COPD alone was USD49.9 billion
[3]. Among all the factors that afflict humanity, hypoxia has the unique feature of being both physiological (i.e., due to altitude), and pathological (i.e., due to a pre-existing disease). When physiological, hypoxia may raise some form of adaptation, and the ability to adapt to environmental stress factors represents a key feature in the Darwinian theory of evolution of species. However, it is not yet clear whether humans can ever adapt to hypoxia, given the high incidence of the clinical manifestations associated with both physiological and pathological hypoxia.
2. Oxygen and Hypoxia
Three 18th-century scientists participated in the discovery of O
2. Carl Wilhelm Scheele (1742–1786), a Swedish–German pharmaceutical chemist, was the first to discover O
2, but his low academic profile and lack of international competitiveness caused him the loss of priority for this discovery
[4]. Joseph Priestley (1733–1804), a polyhedric English chemist, natural philosopher, separatist theologian, grammarian, multi-subject educator, and liberal political theorist, was able to intertwine his scientific work with the ongoing debate on
phlogiston within a conflict with the Church of England that led him to migrate to the US. His publication, although delayed with respect to that of Scheele, gained him priority as a discoverer of O
2 [5]. Finally, Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794), a French nobleman and chemist, coined, together with Marie-Anne Lavoisier, the term “oxygen”, based on the misleading concept of a substance that generates acidity (
-ὀξύς (
oxys, acid)
+ -γενής (
-genēs,
generator)), during the years of the French Revolution that led Antoine to execution under the guillotine
[6]. The contributions by two other 17th-century scientists, the English John Mayhow (1661–1679) and the Polish Michael Sendivogius (1566–1636) should also be mentioned, although their extraordinary work probably was not robust enough to assign them the role of discoverers of O
2 [7].
3. The Oxygen Cascade
Despite important limitations
[8], the O
2 cascade remains a good representation of the path of O
2 from the atmosphere to mitochondria, the final O
2 users (
Figure 1). The blue line represents the progressive stepwise decreases in PO
2 along the path in normoxic healthy conditions. The establishment of O
2 gradients at the interface between adjacent compartments ensures the correct flow of O
2 along the cascade. Each of these gradients must be wide enough to grant a sufficient O
2 supply to the mitochondria
[9]. The red line represents the situation established when atmospheric PO
2 is reduced by one-third, equivalent to 3400 m/13.9 %O
2. Such a drop translates into a reduced width of each gradient step, which corresponds to a decreased supply of O
2 to the mitochondria. Thus, all the interfaces must cooperate to ensure the correct O
2 supply. The same reduction in O
2 supply to mitochondria occurs when the environmental PO
2 is normal, but some sites of resistance to the O
2 flux emerge in the correspondence of one of the interfaces. This situation corresponds to wider PO
2 gradients between adjacent compartments. Such sites of resistance are usually associated with diseases that transform a normoxic situation into a hypoxic one downstream of the block in the O
2 cascade. This determines the establishment of pathological hypoxia, which differs from the physiological one by being often accompanied by factors such as inflammation and redox imbalance, just to name a few.
Figure 1. The oxygen cascade in normoxia (blue) and in hypoxia (red, which depicts the situation at 3400 m/13.9 %O2). The arrows indicate the sites of resistance to the O2 flux that increase the PO2 gradient. These sites of resistance may convert a normoxic situation into a hypoxic one. Other explanations in the text.
The ability to adapt to environmental changes is a key feature in the evolution of species. While the mechanisms underlying the cardiac, nervous, and pulmonary tissues’ initial adaptation, or acclimatization, to hypoxic conditions have recently been worked out
[10], the rules for recognizing the onset of long-term adaptation should include the appearance of complex characters that are too well-fitted to the environment for the fit to have arisen by chance and that help their bearers to survive and reproduce. The concept of adaptation physiology greatly depends on semantic problems related to the meaning of this term
[11]. Although adaptation is believed to involve the establishment of compensatory responses to environmental challenges, not all the responses to a challenge may be adaptive. Thus, there may be three levels of response to challenges depending on the gain: inadequate (gain < 100%), ideal (gain = 100%), and excessive (gain > 100%) (
Figure 2). This re
svie
archw will analyze the responses to the hypoxic challenges in the various resistance sites represented in
Figure 1 in the search for an answer to the question of whether humans can ever adapt to hypoxia.
Figure 2.
Three ways to respond to a challenge.
4. Adaptation vs. Maladaptation
4.1. Ability of Sea Level Populations to Adapt to High Altitude
Most literature data are obtained in the days or weeks immediately following the onset of hypoxia, where the signs of maladaptation are addressed in terms of AMS insurgence. Relatively little data are available to document the effects of longer (months, years) exposures, which may give clues for the ability of low-altitude dwellers to adapt to hypoxia.
The sojourners in the Antarctica plateau are fit and healthy individuals who are specifically trained to sojourn for up to 10 months at an equivalent altitude of 3800 m/13.2 %O
2 in an environment that excludes the presence of disturbing variables related to cold and changes in altitude, with the only probable exception the rupture of circadian rhythms
[12]. In these subjects, the expected changes in the acid–base status are maintained for 10 months without any appreciable modification
[12]. Remarkably, even the metabolome changes remain unaffected for that period of time, with the exception of a slow return toward baseline of the non-polar metabolome after 6 months of hypoxia
[13]. Likewise, the variables linked to the redox imbalance, including ROS, oxidative stress biomarkers, NO, and proinflammatory cytokines, peak by the 20th day of hypoxia but do not return to baseline levels
[14]. Such data highlight a missed capacity of adaptation to hypoxia in Caucasians born at sea level, at least for one year. Longer permanence of sea-level dwellers at altitude, such as immigrant Han Chinese in Tibet, gives rise to up to 18% incidence of CMS
[15]. Thus, to the best of
the our
esearchers' knowledge, available data indicate that sea-level-dwellers exposed to hypoxia for years have missed the ability to adapt to this challenge.
4.2. Generations-Long Adaptation to Hypoxia
About 80 million people live permanently at >2500 m altitude in the Andes, South-East Asia, and Ethiopia
[1]. These populations have developed diverging responses to altitude hypoxia. Andeans go the hematological route
[16] with elevated Hb that enables carrying more O
2 in blood, but high CMS incidence, which occurs in 16% of the adult male population, with increasing prevalence with age, rising up to 30% by the fifth decade of age
[17], highlighting poor adaptation to hypoxia. Tibetans go the respiratory route
[16]: They inhale more air with each breath and breathe more rapidly with high plasma NO
2− + NO
3−, a biomarker of the NO-storing capacity. This results in sporadic CMS in altitude-native Tibetans
[15][18]. Ethiopians Amhara highlanders display lower CMS rates
[19], reduced erythropoiesis, higher plasma NO
2− + NO
3− and cGMP, and lower diastolic blood pressure. These features translate into a marked vasodilatory response to hypoxia with respect to related lowlanders at altitude, who instead display an elevated erythropoietic response
[20]. Although not properly an altitude population, the Kyrghyz commuters are of interest because 14–20% of them show signs of altitude PH and are characterized by a higher-than-normal fraction of hyper-responders to acute hypoxia
[21]. A case–control study identified in healthy Kyrghyz highlanders the presence of genetic traits that discriminate hyper-responders to hypoxia who develop PH
[22]. It was pointed out
[22] that Kyrghyz commuters have unique patterns with respect to other altitude populations because they do not present other features linked to chronic hypoxia besides PH, unlike the Andean population, where polycythemia may have confounding characteristics, or Tibetans, where PH is practically absent.
It is therefore tempting to state that high-altitude populations born and residing in the Himalayas (Tibetans, Sherpas, and to a lesser extent Ladakhis) are “adapted” to altitude because they suffer altitude-related diseases to a lesser extent and display reduced erythropoietic response. By contrast, Andean populations (Aymaras and Quechuas) reveal an exaggerated erythropoietic response with hematocrit values exceeding 50% and an increased risk of dysfunction due to high blood viscosity
[23][24][25]. A hypothesis explaining the Tibetan–Andean differences is the longer altitude residence for Tibetans (about 30,000 years), with enough time to adapt genetically than for Andeans (about 10,000 years)
[26]. These figures are, however, complicated by the relatively recent massive migration into the Andes in the XVIIth century, as opposed to the relatively conserved population distribution in the Himalayas.
4.3. Ability of High-Altitude Populations to Adapt to Sea Level
Although uncommon, in some instances altitude-adapted subjects are forced, mostly for political reasons, to flee their native habitats in search of more suitable environments, often at lower altitudes. Several thousand Tibetan refugees born at altitude but residing at sea level provide the unique opportunity to test the reversibility of the processes that may have driven altitude adaptation. In this instance, the hypoxic stimulus is broken, and the subjects are exposed to a condition of relative hyperoxia.
Figure 3 (Samaja et al., unpublished observations) shows the blood Hb concentration in individuals born in Tibet who have fled to <500 m/>20.1 %O
2, and in Indian-ancestry residents in the same area as a control. Clearly, missing the hypoxic stimulus remarkably depresses erythropoiesis, at least in males, who face the risk of becoming anemic. Another large-scale study revealed a lower RBC count, hematocrit, and Hb levels in Tibetans living long-term at low altitudes compared to their high-altitude counterparts
[27]. In a further study, it was found that the Hb concentration was lower in Tibetans living at sea level than in Han Chinese individuals, along with a higher minute ventilation and blunted pulmonary vascular responses to acute (minutes) and sustained (8 h) hypoxia
[28]. The same study also shows a lower hypoxic induction of HIF-regulated genes in peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as a significant correlation between EPAS1 and EGLN1 genotypes and induction of EPO by hypoxia in Tibetans compared with Han Chinese, highlighting the less-vigorous response to hypoxic challenge
[28]. This evidence converges in indicating the occurrence of outcomes compatible with a response to a relatively hyperoxic environment in subjects adapted to live at altitude. It remains to be established if such a hematological response to relative hyperoxia is harmful.
Figure 3. Hemoglobin concentration in the blood of Tibetan and Indian males (n = 37 and 56, respectively) residing at <500 m/>20.1 %O
2. Tibetans display a lower Hb level (
p < 0.0001, Student’s
t-test). The green lines represent the 95% confidence limits.