BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 1 by Bruna Scaggiante, and Version 2 by Jessie Wu.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the sixth most common cancer in Western countries, includes upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder carcinoma (BC) as the most common cancers among UCs (90–95%). BC is the most common cancer and can be a highly heterogeneous disease, including both non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) forms with different oncologic outcomes. Approximately 80% of new BC diagnoses are classified as NMIBC after the initial transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBt). 

  • non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • bladder sparing treatment
  • chemo-hyperthermia
  • immunotherapy
  • gene

1. Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma (UC), which includes bladder carcinoma (BC) and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), is the sixth most common cancer in Western countries [1]. BC, as the most common cancer, is a highly heterogeneous disease that includes both non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with different oncologic outcomes [2][3][4][2,3,4]. Approximately 80% of newly diagnosed bladder carcinomas are classified as NMIBC after the initial transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBt), representing a broad spectrum of disease [5]. While low-risk NMIBC patients are mainly treated with TURBt alone, intermediate- and high-risk patients often receive adjuvant treatments to reduce disease recurrence and progression [5][6][7][5,6,7]. In this context, intravesical administration of Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) is the current standard treatment [8]. Despite adequate BCG treatment, recurrence occurs in approximately 40% of patients and MIBC in 15% [9]. In particular, highly recurrent BCs represent the highest risk of disease [8]. The European Association of Urology guidelines (EAU) currently define “BCG-unresponsive” as all BCG-refractory tumors and those that develop T1/Ta HG recurrence within six months of completion of adequate BCG exposure or develop carcinoma in situ (CIS) within twelve months of completion of adequate BCG exposure. “Adequate BCG exposure” is defined as the completion of at least five of six doses of a first induction course plus at least two of six doses of a second induction course or two of three doses of a maintenance regimen. Patients with NMIBC who do not respond to BCG are extremely unlikely to benefit from further BCG administration and represent a patient cohort for whom new treatment options are urgently needed [10]. High-risk NMIBCs who do not respond to BCG, therefore, present a therapeutic challenge.
In this specific scenario, non-surgical options are limited, and according to the EAU guidelines [5][11][5,11], the recommended treatment for BCG-unresponsive disease remains radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD). RC and UD remain complex major urological procedures with a recognized high perioperative morbidity due to patient, disease, and surgical factors [12][13][12,13]. Numerous improvements have been made in surgical technique and perioperative management [14]. However, the morbidity profile and survival after RC have remained largely unchanged [15][16][17][15,16,17]. As this is a predominantly elderly disease, a non-negligible number of patients are considered unsuitable for such surgery [16].
Despite the unsatisfactory efficacy profile, with a complete response rate (CR) of about 18%, by 2020 the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved conservative treatment for CIS patients who did not respond to BCG was intravesical valrubicin [18]. Nowadays, new therapeutic options, potentially ready for the first time, could lead to a turning point in the treatment of patients who do not respond to BCG. In such a scenario, two unmet clinical needs could emerge. First, reliable biomarkers could identify early those patients who do not respond to BCG immunotherapy. Second, the current arsenal of new intravesical and systemic treatment candidate agents could be expanded for bladder-sparing strategies. If the identification of new molecular biomarkers is of interest for all disease stages of BC [19][20][21][19,20,21], the choice of new treatment candidates for NMIBC is wide, leading the FDA to accept single-arm clinical trials as adequate clinical evidence for evaluating therapeutics [22][23][24][22,23,24]. The choice of new treatment candidates for NMIBC is wide, leading the FDA to accept single-arm clinical trials as adequate clinical evidence for evaluating therapeutics.

2. Intravesical Chemotherapy

Over the years, intravesical administration of various chemotherapeutic agents has been investigated in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Figure 1 summarizes the drugs and mechanisms of action of intravesical chemotherapies; Table 1 summarizes the studies on intravesical treatments and the main findings over the last twenty years.
Figure 1.
Active molecules and mechanism of action of intravesical chemotherapy. The image was created with
.
Video Production Service