Thermoelectric materials have gained wide attention to realize multilevel efficient energy management to alleviate the increasingly severe energy crisis. Oxide ceramics were well-explored as potential thermoelectric candidates because of their outstanding merits, including abundance, eco-friendliness, high-temperature stability, and chemical stability. AThis entry aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the diversified state-of-the-art oxide ceramics and establish the links between composition designing, preparation process, structural characteristics, and properties to summarize the underlying chemistry and physics mechanism of band engineering, doping, composited with the second phase, defects engineering, and entropy engineering is provided. Furthermore, advanced device design and applications such as thermoelectric modules, miniature generators, sensors, and coolers were summarized. Ultimately, the challenges and future perspective of oxides ceramics for the device design and thermoelectric applications in the development of energy harvesting technology have been prospected.
Thermoelectric materials (TEs) have been used as a potential energy harvesting technology because they can convert heat into electricity and have no requirements for waste heat temperature [1][2][3]. Thermoelectric devices generally consist of n-type and p-type TEs wired electrically in series (or partly parallel) and thermally in parallel. Furthermore, there are also thermoelectric devices with single n-type and p-type TEs. They have the advantages of no moving parts, no noise, small size, etc., and have significant application merits in the military, aerospace, and high-tech energy fields [4][5].
It has been more than 200 years since the thermoelectric effect was discovered, and people have been constantly exploring and developing its industrial applications. In the early 1920s, Altenkirch, a German physicist, developed the fundamentals of thermoelectric power generation and refrigeration and summarized the performance evaluation parameters of TEs [6]: electrical conductivity (σ), Seebeck coefficient (S), and thermal conductivity (κ). Dimensionless thermoelectric merit (ZT = S2σT/κ, S is Seebeck coefficient, σ is electrical conductivity, T is absolute temperature, κ is thermal conductivity) is usually used as an indicator to measure the thermoelectric performance [7]. TEs with large ZT values must meet the requirements of a high Seebeck coefficient to ensure the generation of the obvious thermoelectric effect—high electrical conductivity leading to small Joule heat, large output power, as well as low thermal conductivity, are required to generate a substantial temperature difference. The above three thermoelectric parameters have a strong coupled relationship because they are dependent on the carrier concentration in a conflicting manner that restricts and influences each other, making how to optimize thermoelectric performance a huge challenge. Therefore, the coordinated regulation of S, σ, and κ to improve ZT has become the key point to realize the industrial application of thermoelectric materials.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of thermoelectric effects. (a) Seebeck effect for power generation, (b) Peltier effect for refrigeration, (c) Thomson effect for reversible cooling or heating.
Figure 2. Schematic of the crystal structure of thermoelectric oxides. (a) SrTiO3, (b) ZnO [15], (c) CaMnO3 [16], (d) Ca3Co4O9 [17], (e) NaxCoO2 [18], (f) BiCuSeO [19].
Colloidal Synthesis
Solid-phase reaction method has the disadvantages of low purity and high energy consumption. To overcome the shortcoming of the high-temperature solid-phase method, the hydrothermal synthesis and sol-gel method became aroused researchers’ attention. The materials synthesized by the sol-gel method generally use inorganic salt or organic alkoxide as the precursor and, through a chemical reaction such as hydrolysis polymerization, nucleation, and growth transform from liquid precursors to sol and then to a network structure known as a ‘gel’, and then after dried and heating treatment to obtain the target material. Hydrothermal Synthesis The hydrothermal method is a solution reaction-based approach and can synthesize nanomaterials, which have been successfully applied for the preparation of TEs [40]. Usually, hydrothermal synthesis may occur over a wide temperature range from ambient temperature to extremely high temperatures and requires high-pressure conditions to generate high vapor pressures to trigger the chemical reaction or to control the morphology. Solvothermal Synthesis The solvothermal synthesis is analogous to the hydrothermal method and is based on heating the precursors and a solvent in a closed system at a temperature above the boiling point of the solvent used [27]. The synthetic procedure usually requires high temperature and high pressure to create the supercritical circumstances to develop the peculiar behavior of the solvent, exerting different influences on the precursors resulting in the desired product. Park et al. synthesized Ag-SrTiO3 nanocomposites by one-pot solvothermal method [41] using strontium nitrate (Sr(NO3)2), silver (I) nitrate (AgNO3), and titanium tetraisopropoxide [(CH3)2CHO]4Ti (TTIP) as starting ingredients. Furthermore, the loading quantity of Ag could be easily manipulated by adjusting the concentration of the AgNO3 precursor. In addition, the thermoelectric properties of layered TEs can be effectively controlled by bottom-up wet chemical synthesis of two-dimensional nanosheets/nanoplates [42][43][44].Several of the selection rules are somewhat paradoxical as a result of the inherent trade-off effect between σ and S. Many optimized strategies may have a complicated correlated impact on S, σ, and κ. As an illustration, the increase of doping concentration will improve σ while decreasing S. Then, Ioffe’s finding in doped semiconductors was the first effort to empirically determine the carrier concentration “sweet spot” of excellent thermoelectrics is n = 1018–1020 cm−3 [45]. Consequently, an optimal power factor (PF = S2σ) versus doping concentration exists at a relatively high doping level. Furthermore, a further decrease of κ is necessary to produce a high ZT.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns, (b) κ, (c) TEM results of the high-entropy (Ca0.2Sr0.2Ba0.2La0.2Pb0.2)TiO3 ceramics [86]. (d–h) S, σ, PF, κtotal, and ZT values of the high-entropy (Sr0.2Ca0.255Ba0.25RE0.25)TiO3 ceramics [87]. (i) Schematic diagram of the possible phonon scattering in reducing lattice thermal conductivity for high-entropy ceramic [88].
Figure 4. (a) Positron lifetime spectrum. (b) Schematic representation of trapped positrons for Bi1–xCu1–ySeO samples in (100) plane. (c) Schematic representation of phonon scattering with Bi/Cu vacancies. (d–f) σ, κ, and ZT values of the Bi1–xCu1–ySeO samples [91].
Figure 5. (a) HRTEM images of the (Sr0.25Ca0.25Ba0.25RE0.25)TiO3 sample [88], (b) HRTEM images and the corresponding FFT image and IFFT image (b-1) along the [92] zone axis of the Sr0.9La0.1(Zr0.25Sn0.25Ti0.25Hf0.25)O3 sample [93], (c) HRTEM images and the corresponding IFFT images (c1 and c2) and strain map (c3) by geometric phase analysis (GPA) method [94].Figure 6. (a) BSE image, (b–d) TEM images, and (e) the sketch diagram of phonon scattering at the grain boundary and zigzag edge of the (Ca0.87Ag0.1La0.03)3Co4O9 textured ceramics, and temperature dependence of the thermoelectric properties of the samples in parallel and perpendicular to the tape-casting direction. (f,g) Electrical resistivity, (h,i) thermal conductivity, (j,k) ZT values [103]. (l) BSE image, (m) Total thermal conductivity, and (n) ZT values of the Sr0.9La0.1TiO3-based textured ceramic [104].