Nematode Communities and Soil Health under Climate Change: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Peter Tang and Version 1 by David Pires.

Soil health is intimately intertwined with ecosystem services. Climate change negatively impacts ecosystem functioning, by altering carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycles and shifting nutrient bioavailability, thus hampering food production and exacerbating biodiversity loss. Soil ecosystem services are provided by belowground biota, and as the most abundant metazoans on Earth, nematodes are key elements of soil food webs and reliable bioindicators of soil health. 

  • abiotic stress
  • beneficial nematodes
  • ecosystem services
  • food webs
  • functional ecology
  • soil health
  • soil microfauna

1. Introduction

Soil is a complex system and a crucial component of sustainability [1]. Soil health is broadly defined as “the capacity of soil to function as a vital living system, within ecosystem and land-use boundaries, to sustain plant and animal productivity, maintain or enhance water and air quality, and promote plant and animal health” [2]. In other words, the concept highlights the ability of soil to perform important agricultural and ecological functions, including productivity, adaptability to management and inputs, and resilience against biotic and abiotic stressors. It must also exhibit robust resistance to degradation processes and the ability to rebound from disturbances due to its inherent resilience, defined by Holling as “a measure of the persistence of systems and of their ability to absorb change and disturbance and still maintain the same relationships between populations or state variables” [3,4][3][4]. Logically, soil health and ecosystem services are intimately intertwined. Ecosystem services encompass a wide range of benefits obtained from ecosystems, including (i) provisioning services (e.g., food and water), (ii) regulating services (e.g., natural disaster regulation, pest and pathogen control, and soil conservation), (iii) supporting services (e.g., nutrient cycling and pedogenesis), and (iv) cultural services (e.g., spiritual and recreational benefits) [5]. Soil is responsible for net primary production, it sustains plant and animal life, promotes water quality regulation, remediates pollution, intervenes in nutrient cycling, while providing physical stability and support [6,7][6][7]. Furthermore, it enhances the environment overall, by moderating climate at local, regional, and global scales [8]. In order to support sustainability, managing soil health must take into account that (i) improving multiple soil ecosystem services requires a multifunctional approach; (ii) enhancing one soil service can have favorable effects on some services but unfavorable outcomes on others; (iii) soil health management must ensure the long-term sustainability of soil services [9].
Climate change has a direct impact on the biological, chemical, and physical properties of soil, as it leads to shifts in temperature regimes and precipitation patterns [10,11][10][11]. Consequently, carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and hydrology cycles are likely to suffer the backlash [10], and the presence of multiple environmental stressors caused by human footprint were found to hamper soil ecosystem services across biomes [12]. Semiarid tropical regions of the world are particularly vulnerable, and with soils acting as important C reservoirs, a severe depletion of organic C will inevitably affect soil health [10]. Moreover, the decomposition of soil organic matter is thermosensitive [13[13][14],14], and climate change could lead to organic C-exhausted soils in response to altered C and N biogeochemical cycles and shifts in nutrient bioavailability, further exacerbating biodiversity loss [10].
Nematodes are part of the soil microfauna and represent approximately 80% of all multicellular animals of the terrestrial biosphere [6,15][6][15]. They are highly adaptable and successful animals, having colonized nearly all ecosystems on the planet [16,17,18][16][17][18]. According to their feeding habits, soil-dwelling nematodes can be assigned to one of five trophic groups: bacterivores, fungivores, herbivores, omnivores, and predators [19]. Nematode families and genera have been classified into a colonizer–persister scale (c-p), and given a rating from 1 to 5, indicative of their life strategy [20]. The c-p 1 group is made up of colonizers (r-strategists) like opportunistic bacterial feeders that rapidly increase in numbers under favorable conditions, exhibiting a short life cycle, high colonization ability, and tolerance to disturbance [20]. On the other hand, the c-p 5 group consists of persisters (K-strategists), such as some herbivores, omnivores, and predators, with a low reproduction rate, long life cycle, low colonization ability, and high sensitivity to disturbance [20]. Due to their rapid and taxon-specific response to environmental changes, nematodes are valuable bioindicators [21,22][21][22]. Nematofauna diversity is largely influenced by factors such as soil texture, soil moisture, and food availability [21]. However, the response of nematodes to environmental stress varies among trophic groups, with those having shorter generation times and/or high fecundity showing a positive response, while those with longer generation times and/or lower fecundity being more sensitive [23,24][23][24]. Free-living nematodes (bacterivores, fungivores, omnivores, and predators), widely referred to as beneficial nematodes, outnumber herbivores in terms of abundance and diversity, and they play critical roles in ecosystem functioning, occupying key ecological niches in belowground food webs, and are involved in C sequestration, energy transfer, and nutrient mineralization, increasing their availability to plants and, thus, improving soil fertility [25,26,27,28][25][26][27][28]. Soil nematodes directly or indirectly contribute to (i) human well-being, by driving key processes to food production; (ii) climate regulation, by intervening in the short and long-term fluxes and flows of C in and out of soils; and (iii) support terrestrial life and diversity, through processes like decomposition, nutrient cycling, and regulation of pests and pathogens (Figure 1) [29]. Healthy soils typically have a high abundance and diversity of free-living nematodes in complex food webs with long chains and feedback loops, and a low proportion of herbivores [23,30,31][23][30][31]. Indeed, a nematode community analysis can provide invaluable information on the status of soils: (i) a high ratio of bacterial- to fungal-feeding nematodes indicates that organic matter is predominantly decomposed by bacteria and that rapid nutrient cycling is occurring; (ii) a predominance of fungivores indicates that nutrient cycling is relatively slow, as the decomposition channel is dominated by fungi; (iii) low population densities of omnivores and predators suggest disturbance, such as excessive fertilizer inputs, tillage, or the presence of pollutants; (iv) high numbers of omnivores and predators indicate that the system is biologically complex and resilient, and has some natural ability to suppress plant-parasitic nematodes and other soil-borne pathogens [32]. In agricultural systems, plant-parasitic nematodes are problematic, but in a broader ecological context, they are fundamental in shaping aboveground vegetation communities and contributors to plant performance in natural ecosystems by plant–soil feedbacks [33,34][33][34]. Upon feeding on their hosts, herbivorous nematodes alter root exudation patterns, and indirectly modify the rhizobiome (the microbial diversity attached to and influenced by roots), thus curbing nutrient availability to plants, especially of N and phosphorous (P), and contributing to plant community dynamics [30,35,36][30][35][36]. On the other hand, while the contributions of beneficial nematodes to plant performance remain largely unknown, they can have positive effects on plants by stimulating microbe-induced C sequestration, and keeping pests and pathogens at bay [37]. Nematodes are aquatic animals that require water to move, feed, and reproduce, and climate extremes are anticipated to shift the structure of nematode communities and their roles in ecosystems [38,39,40][38][39][40]. However, the impacts of climate change on nematode abundance and functional groups have not been consensual, displaying significant variation across different studies [41,42,43,44,45][41][42][43][44][45].
Figure 1.
Illustrative representation of the main ecosystem services provided by soil-dwelling nematodes.

2. Nematode Community Dynamics under Climate Change

A demographic explosion is driving unprecedented food demand and pushing natural ecosystems to fragmentation. The effects of anthropogenic activities in natural systems are known to reduce aboveground biodiversity, hindering ecosystem services and, consequently, their contributions to human well-being [47][46], but data of such impacts on belowground taxa are scarce, perhaps because they are difficult to assess. Nevertheless, nematode community structure is a fast and reliable predictor of ecological disturbance, giving us insights into the status of the whole system.

2.1. Temperature

The soil nematode community structure seems to be particularly susceptible to warming, favoring some groups in detriment of others, but these negative effects can be limited by aboveground vegetation that counters them to some extent. Both parameters also affect vegetation, with an anticipated indirect effect on nematode communities [50][47], although these confounding effects are not assessed in this reviewere. The main effects of increasing temperature on nematode communities are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Effect of increasing temperature on soil nematode communities.

Factor

Effects on Soil Nematodes

Reference

Factor(s)

Effects on Soil Nematodes

Reference

Effects on Soil Nematodes

Reference

High temperature

Reduction in nematode diversity and genera richness

Long-term increase in

mean annual precipitation

[

Decline in total nematode abundance due to predation pressure, and increase in nematode abundance48]

2.4. Nutrient Enrichment

The structure of nematode communities can be adversely affected by mineral fertilization, resulting in simplified soil food webs with fewer omnivores–predators and more herbivores and bacterivores, impairing ecosystem functions. On the other hand, organic amendments can increase nematode diversity and promote a higher energy transfer in the system. Although the above studies mainly report on crop nutrition management, they are informative of the nematode community response to nutrient quantities and balance in soils. Global change has been promoting the deposition of N and other nutrients to both agricultural and natural ecosystems, mostly accompanying urbanization. This, combined with the anticipated depletion of P in worldwide terrestrial ecosystems, may tip the balance of soil food webs and aggravate adverse conditions brought about by progressive soil degradation (including acidification) due to climate effects. The main effects of nutrient enrichment on nematode communities are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4.
Effects of nutrient enrichment on soil nematode communities.

Factor(s)

Effects on Soil Nematodes

Reference

Long-term N enrichment

.
Table 5.
Effects of multiple factors on soil nematode communities.

Factors

Effects on Soil Nematodes

Reference

Reduction in herbivores, with a short-term decrease in bacterivores and fungivores who recover over time, and relative tolerance of omnivores–predators

[49]

2.2. Water Stress

Drought is a key limitation of soil nematode abundance, even in the short term, and has persistent effects. Nevertheless, the soil nematode community structure recovers gradually as precipitation increases, even though these positive effects are not straightforward, and water uptake by plants can further stress an already fragile system. The main effects of water stress on nematode communities are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Effects of water stress on soil nematode communities.

Intensive land use

Soil moisture, P addition, and

aboveground vegetation

Increase in bacterivores, fungivores, and herbivores

Plant removal dwindled nematode taxon richness and abundance of bacterivores and herbivores; the abundance of fungivores and omnivores–predators increased under the same conditions

[51][50]

Plant type and water availability had a greater impact on nematode abundance and community composition; drought was detrimental to the total density of nematodes and functional guilds; bacterivores, herbivores, and omnivores were significantly more abundant in soils with legumes

[56][55]

[72]

High proportion of plant-parasitic nematodes

[

71

]

[78][77]

Soil type

[52][51]

Lower biodiversity and C/N ratios in cultivated soils, resulting in a reduction in nematode abundance and diversity; increase in abundance of trophic groups, total abundance, and diversity of nematodes in soils with higher pH and C and N contents

[57][

Long-term N fertilization

Biotic (microbial biomass and

competition) and abiotic variables

(moisture, salinity, and elevation)

Greater nematode abundance in fertilized plots, while richness, diversity, and ecological maturity were lower; enriched food web mostly driven by bacterivores and herbivores, with persisting effects overtime

56]

Decrease in free-living nematode diversity and evenness

[53][52]

[

73][72]

Spatial segregation between two competing bacterivore species, with contrasting responses to abiotic factors: one best adapted to high salinity, lower temperatures, and low moisture environments, while the other thrives at higher temperatures, higher soil moisture, and lower salinity

[79][78]

Land use conversion

High N deposition

Negative impacts on soil taxa across a large spatial scale, but agronomic practices limit the climatic constraints on belowground biodiversity

Decrease in most nematode trophic groups and community diversity under understory addition of N compared to canopy addition of N

Climatic, soil, and

historical factors

[58][57]

[74][73]

Current factors, particularly climate, are more influential than historical factors in shaping nematode diversity patterns on a broader scale

[80][79]

Water scarcity

Short-term N and P

enrichment under

soil acidification

Reduction in total nematode abundance, and decrease in relative abundance of bacterivores, fungivores, and predators; relative abundance of herbivores unaffected

Nematode variables, including community structure, were largely unaffected by short-term nutrient enrichment under soil acidification

[54][53]

[75]

Liming treatments

Lower bacterivore and fungivore abundance, marginal increase in omnivores and decrease in fungivores, higher maturity and structure index, and lower prey:predator ratio

[55][54]

2.3. Land Use

Land use, with a particular emphasis on the conversion of conventional agriculture to agroecological practices, can have profound effects on soil nematode communities, highlighting the importance of above- and belowground biodiversity to withstand environmental stress, by preserving soil food web complexity and crucial ecosystem functions. Taken together, the above results suggest local anthropogenic effects can outweigh overall effects of climate change according to land-use type and intensity and may introduce severe confounding effects to predictive models of soil nematode community response to climate drivers. The main effects of land use on nematode communities are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Effects of different land uses on soil nematode communities.

Factor(s)

Monoculture

Increase in fungivores, and decrease in bacterivores, herbivores, and omnivores–predators

Interacting nematode and microbial communities minimally impacted by liming, with an increase in omnivores and predators, who keep bacterivores under control; stronger interaction in the presence of an abundant microbial community

[59][58]

[

74

]

[

81][80]

Monoculture, tillage, and manure

Increase in bacterivores and fungivores, and decrease in omnivores–predators

Long-term organic amendments

and mineral fertilization

Positive effect on the abundance of most functional guilds by organic amendments, which enhanced the energy transfer among nematode communities, while increasing the relative allocation of energy flux to bacterivores and fungivores and decreasing the relative allocation to herbivores

[60][

[76][75]

Increasing aridity across

a large spatial scale

Decline in total and relative nematode abundance of each functional guild under increasing aridity; taxonomic richness of total nematode community and functional guilds decreased under moisture scarcity; at the dry end of the aridity gradient, richness of bacterivores was higher, while herbivores declined steadily; richness of fungivores and omnivores–predators remained relatively stable up to a certain point, before dropping steeply

59]

Vegetation succession

Positive effect on nematode abundance, diversity, complexity of community structure, and diversity-weighted abundance

][

Liming, P, and zinc inputs

60

P input significantly increased nematode diversity and genera; bacterivores and herbivores were the most abundant trophic groups, and predators the least common; nematode biodiversity was unaffected by liming, and nematode diversity and maturity were reduced in the absence of liming

[61]

[

77][76]

Livestock grazing

Decline in bacterivores, herbivores, and omnivores–predators abundance, lower total nematode abundance, and no detrimental effect on fungivore abundance

[62][61]

Land degradation

Lower nematode trophic diversity

[63][62]

2.5. Combined Stressors

In general, the greater the number of disturbances, whether directly or indirectly caused by human activities, the longer the recovery time for the system and the greater the impact on soil nematode communities, which compromises their benefits to humankind. Although manipulative studies in experimental units research has been elucidating the impacts of each independent factor individually, observational studies in actual ecosystems suggest strong interactive effects among them. It is therefore anticipated that a large sampling effort at appropriate scales, combined with an in-depth local and remote-sensing characterization of sampled ecosystems can provide key knowledge that can be translated into management and policies for climate change adaptation and mitigation. The combined effect of multiple stressors on nematode communities is summarized in Table 5

[

82

]

[

81

]

Drought and fertilization

Drought favored bacterivores and fungivores, and likely had detrimental effects on higher trophic levels; fertilization caused a prominent increase in bacterivores and an equally significant drop in fungivores

[83][82]

Elevated CO2 and N,

warming, and drought

Increase in nematode density at elevated N and ambient CO2, and ambient N and elevated CO2

[84][83]

Warming and precipitation

Decrease in nematode abundance, especially of bacterivores and herbivores (with minor effects on fungivores), under artificial warming, but the nematode community diversity and functions remained stable; decrease in nematode abundance, especially of bacterivores and omnivores–predators, under reduced precipitation, with fungivores and herbivores relatively insensitive to water stress; increase in nematode abundance and community diversity with water availability

[85][84]

Intensive land use

Ecological and edaphic factors

Generalists equally abundant in all ecosystems, with specialists dominating agricultural landscapes and less abundant in low disturbed soils; highest richness and diversity in grasslands and dairy farms, with low abundances in shrubland–woodland habitats

Reduced nematode abundance and diversity with increasing altitude, with bacterivores consistently the dominant group; nematode diversity was mostly influenced by temperature and moisture; decrease in nematode abundance with increasing soil acidity; nematode diversity and richness were directly proportional to nutrient (N and P) levels

[64][63]

[

86][85]

Plant resource-use strategies

N deposition under reduced

water availability

Plants with acquisitive strategies promoted nematode abundance, but fewer opportunistic nematodes in the rhizosphere of acquisitive plants compared to conservative plants

Reduced nematode abundance and diversity under N addition and reduced water input; synergistic effects of N addition and reduced water input on soil nematode communities at higher trophic levels; sole addition of N was more detrimental to the nematode community

[65][64]

[

87][86]

Agricultural practices

Returning agricultural residues

(i) Conventional practices decrease abundance, trophic structure, and taxonomic richness of nematode communities; (ii) agroecological practices enhance the functional and taxonomic diversity of nematodes: total nematode abundance and absolute abundance of fungivores, herbivores, and omnivores–predators; reduction in herbivore abundance in crop rotation; increase in omnivores–predators in cover crops; increase in bacterivores and fungivores in organic fertilization; reduction in nematode abundance and food web structure in monoculture and pesticide application, while copiotrophic nematodes are favored

Nematode diversity was lower in treatments with conventional chemical NPK fertilizers; positive correlation between omnivore–predator abundance and ecosystem multifunctionality and soil fertility

[66][65]

[

88][87]

Spatial distance and

environmental filtering

Plant type altered β-diversity of nematodes; spatial turnover was the primary process driving total β-diversity of the nematode community

[67][66]

Vegetation restoration with

varying degrees of degradation

Strong effects on soil nematodes observed under low degradation

[68][67]

Crop-tree thinning

Increase in abundance of soil nematodes, along with the relative abundance of herbivores in all systems; increase in proportion of stress-tolerant enrichment and general opportunists

[69][68]

Harvest frequency

and legume density

Legume addition and density were drivers of total nematode abundance, especially bacterivores, while improving metabolic activities of total nematodes, bacterivores, and omnivores–predators; positive effects of legume addition subsided after increased harvesting frequency

[70][69]

Agricultural practices

Plant diversity enhanced the activity of beneficial nematodes; positive effects of nematodes on plant growth and function associated with higher values in soil pH and cation contents

[71][70]

3. Nematode Contributions to Soil Health

The adaptability of nematodes, as evidenced by frequent shifts in habitat transition, along with their ability to withstand environmental changes, has significant implications for soil functions on a global scale. Indeed, the ability of nematode functional guilds to perform ecosystem services depends on the soil condition [25] that can be measured according to their metabolic footprints [89][88]. However, land use (including soil properties), agricultural management practices, and climate all contribute to shaping nematode communities and, thus, affect nematode contributions to soil health through modification of their abundance, functional groups, and metabolic footprints, leading to shifts in ecosystem processes and services [90,91,92][89][90][91]. According to the most comprehensive dataset on abundance and functional group composition reported to date, 4.40 ± 0.643 × 1020 nematodes are estimated to inhabit the topsoil across the globe [28,93][28][92]. Among these, 1.92 ± 0.208 × 1020 are bacterivores, 1.25 ± 0.114 × 1020 herbivores, 0.64 ± 0.065 × 1020 fungivores, 0.39 ± 0.046 × 1020 omnivores, and 0.20 ± 0.031 × 1020 predators, amounting to an estimated biomass of 0.3 gigatonnes (Gt) and representing 82% of the total human biomass on the planet. Nematodes are especially abundant in regions of the world that are more susceptible to the detrimental effects of climate change, like boreal forests and tundra. During the growing season, soil-dwelling nematodes may account for a C turnover of 0.14 Gt C per month, and although these are approximations of their metabolic footprint, this is strong evidence that nematodes are major players in soil C sequestration. Furthermore, they are direct intervenors in ecosystem services such as litter decomposition, nutrient cycling, and plant nutrient uptake. Indeed, understanding the susceptibilities and ecological preferences of soil nematodes can help predict changes in ecosystem services. To determine which factors best explain a soil health trait, Martin et al. [31] explored the incorporation of nematode communities in the assessment of belowground biota by using an exploratory factor analysis of permanganate oxidizable C, soil protein, and mineralizable C, based on data from two longstanding experiments across many different fields. Fungivores were found to be highly integrated with soil biological health indicators of permanganate oxidizable C and acid phosphatase, suggesting that this functional guild may be essential for supplying essential ecosystem services, especially C cycling and P mineralization. To determine the metabolic footprint and soil food web complexity across two ecosystems in Kenya, Karuri [94][93] collected soil samples and assessed the nematode community structure. Nematode functional group abundance differed between the two systems, with tea fields recording a significantly higher number of c-p 2 nematodes while the c-p 3 category was greater in the forest. This resulted in a greater predator footprint in the tropical forest, possibly contributing to a slightly more structured state as indicated by the functional metabolic footprint. Overall, the tropical forest had a higher abundance of nematode genera compared to the tea field, but the latter yielded a high density of c-p 2 nematodes (mainly bacterivores and fungivores) that are best suited to survive in unfavorable conditions. This study underlines that the conversion of this natural ecosystem to tea fields affected the nematode community structure and compromised the food web complexity, with a reduced predator footprint and increased herbivory disservice. In an attempt to shed light on how microbe-feeding nematodes impact plant performance in low P soils, Jiang et al. [95][94] designed a series of experiments in natural and sterilized soils with wheat. The presence of nematodes enriched bacterial community structure for certain groups, while also strengthening microbial connectance. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria facilitated P cycling and were responsible for these changes in microbiome structure, but this enhancement varied according to nematode feeding behavior: nematodes that had weaker feeding intensity were found to support a greater abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and lead to better plant performance in comparison to nematodes with greater feeding intensity. Nevertheless, this work provides insight into how soil nematodes contribute to shaping bacterial communities and increasing P bioavailability, by interacting with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, thus enhancing plant performance and providing key ecosystem services. Likewise, Zheng et al. [96][95] conducted a 7-year field experiment to understand how nematode predation influences P availability and cycling. The addition of nematodes, along with chemical and organic fertilizers, led to a significant improvement in the nutrient availability in the rhizosphere. This increase in N availability suggests that nematode predation may have caused shifts in C/N ratios. Nematode feeding on specific microbial taxa induced changes in the overall community structure. On the whole, these results highlight the importance of nematode predation in shaping the rhizosphere microbiome community and inducing microbially mediated mechanisms of competitive interaction, by enhancing P availability in the rhizosphere.
A stable and diverse soil nematode community secures efficient decomposition, leading to more nutrient mineralization that readily become available to plants, thus reducing the need for fertilizer application. Moreover, a natural regulation of pests and diseases performed by soil nematodes will reduce our dependence on pesticides. Ultimately, with reduced farmer intervention and corresponding anthropogenic impact, systems will be less disturbed and soils healthier.

4. How Nematodes Promote Soil Resilience

As highly adaptable animals, with diverse roles in ecosystem functioning, the physiological and life history traits of nematodes make them less susceptible to environmental changes compared to larger fauna higher-up in the food web. Indeed, these characteristics could prove useful for the resistance and resilience of soils to natural and anthropogenic changes. To better comprehend the role of bacterivores in maintaining functional stability of ecosystems under disturbance, Chen et al. [97][96] studied their contributions to promoting soil resistance and resilience under copper and heat stress. The relative shifts in two dominant bacterivore genera, Acrobeloides and Protorhabditis, responded differently to disturbance. Protorhabditis exhibited greater resistance and resilience to copper stress compared to Acrobeloides, while both genera displayed higher resilience only by the end of the experiment under heat stress. Indeed, bacterivores showed a positive effect on soil resilience under thermal stress starting at 28 days. The increase in relative abundance of bacterivores did not significantly affect soil resistance in terms of microbiota but it improved soil resilience to copper stress. The differences in responses of soil function to disturbance highlight the role of bacteria-feeding nematodes in promoting ecosystem stability under stress. To determine the effects of soil properties, rainfall, and temperature on soil nematodes, da Silva et al. [98][97] analyzed the changes in nematode community structure under contrasting types of land use in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Brazil. Nematofauna composition in the secondary forest differed in abundance and richness compared to agricultural systems, being expectedly higher in the former and lower in the latter, with bacterivores and omnivore–predators more susceptible to the type of land use. The variation in taxonomic composition among the studied sites was strongly related to soil properties, monthly mean rainfall, and temperature, which accounted for 65.42% of the total variation. These results further indicate that anthropogenic activities, expressed by the conversion of native vegetation to cropping systems, which modify soil characteristics, as well as climate variables, negatively affect the structure and composition of nematode communities. Nevertheless, changes in nematode community composition and structure can be reversed by allowing the fields to undergo secondary forest regeneration after abandonment. Seeking to identify the major ecological predictors of soil invertebrate diversity, Bastida et al. [99][98] surveyed 83 locations in six continents, from polar to arid climates, to study three soil invertebrates: nematodes, arachnids, and rotifers. Different ecosystem types such as forest, grasslands, and shrublands were included in the survey and nematodes were the most abundant, accounting for 43% of all taxa surveyed. Aridity was detrimental to the diversity of nematodes, whereas forest, plant richness, and annual net primary productivity were positively correlated. These findings exposed potential vulnerabilities of soil invertebrates to climate change in locations where hotter temperatures may occur in the future. Moreover, deforestation processes and increase in aridity may reduce nematode diversity, providing evidence of the importance of vegetation and climate for the diversity of soil invertebrates. Considering an increasing likelihood of extreme climatic events, Majdi et al. [100][99] exposed five species of free-living bacterivorous nematodes to a wide range of temperatures under controlled conditions, and their population growth rates and body-size distributions were measured. Body size at maturity was inversely proportional to temperature, mature females were laying a smaller number of eggs at higher temperatures, and a prevalence of early juvenile stages resulted in reduced body-mass structure with increasing temperature. Additionally, closely related species like Plectus acuminatus and P. cf. velox had very different thermal tolerance ranges, with the population growth of most tested species declining between 25 and 30 °C, and A. nanus exhibiting the broadest thermal tolerance range. This study demonstrated how thermic stress can induce changes in the growth and size–structure of bacterivores. To investigate the community-weighted mean body mass of soil nematodes, Andriuzzi et al. [101][100] studied the role of water availability in the body size of these invertebrates across a gradient of precipitation in North American grasslands, ranging from arid to semiarid and mesic conditions. An increase in nematode community-weighted mean mass from arid to mesic conditions was observed, but no effects were reported at the arid site. When grouping community-weighted mean mass by feeding habits, only plant-parasitic nematodes showed a positive response to water input in semiarid and mesic conditions. This suggests that aridity acts as a buffer against large-bodied nematodes, limiting community body size shifts in response to extreme events, either drought or rainfall. Aiming to study the latitudinal variation in soil nematode communities under climate warming-related range-expanding and native plants, Wilschut et al. [102][101] showed that the composition of soil nematode communities changes across a latitudinal gradient, but not their richness or abundance, with plant species identity (both range-expanding and native plant species) being the strongest predictor of this shift. These findings further indicate that this variation is less dependent on soil characteristics, such as pH and soil moisture. In addition, plant species that expand their range due to climate warming may experience advantages by being free from nematode herbivory in their new habitat. A plant removal experiment was set up by Wang et al. [103][102] to better understand how dominant vegetation changes impact nematode assemblages. Edaphic properties, especially soil C and N content, were the primary drivers of nematode community structure and community-weighted mean biomass, with no observable short-term effects resulting from vegetation removal. However, long-term effects on nematode assemblages are expectable due to nutrient flow mediated by shifts in vegetation composition. To characterize and explore the relationship between soil biota and plant diversity and productivity, Bennett et al. [104][103] carried out a long-term experiment. Plant species richness had a positive effect on fungi, including increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, while reducing plant-parasitic nematodes. Overall, soil biota resistance to disturbance increased with plant diversity, highlighting the importance of plant species richness for belowground communities. To evaluate the impacts of various measures of trophic diversity, climate, and soil environmental factors across three spatial scales, Wu et al. [105][104] conducted a field survey on the stability of ecosystems on the Mongolian Plateau. Soil biota diversity, including α-and β-diversity, positively contributed to ecosystem stability, with soil nematode diversity and trophic groups associated with higher ecosystem stability. The relatively low abundance of herbivores may have contributed to enhanced plant performance by increasing root exudation, which stimulated microbial activity and nutrient availability. The positive association of soil biota diversity with ecosystem stability was similar to that of plant diversity in some cases. Similarly, an increase in the abundance of higher trophic levels such as omnivores–predators and microbial-feeding nematodes may have resulted in improved nutrient transfer to plants, leading to enhanced plant productivity and maintaining ecosystem stability through top–down effects. Severe anthropogenic impacts often lead to simplified soil food webs, with limited top–down control by omnivores–predators, ultimately compromising ecosystem functioning and impairing their natural ability to mitigate the effects of climate change. It is therefore crucial to restore the complexity of soil food webs to enhance soil resilience to climate change.

References

  1. Brevik, E.C.; Cerdà, A.; Mataix-Solera, J.; Pereg, L.; Quinton, J.N.; Six, J.; Van Oost, K. The Interdisciplinary Nature of SOIL. SOIL 2015, 1, 117–129.
  2. Doran, J.W.; Zeiss, M.R. Soil Health and Sustainability: Managing the Biotic Component of Soil Quality. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2000, 15, 3–11.
  3. Lal, R. Soil Health and Climate Change: An Overview. In Soil Health and Climate Change; Singh, B.P., Cowie, A.L., Chan, K.Y., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011; Volume 29, pp. 3–24. ISBN 978-3-642-20256-8.
  4. Holling, C.S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1973, 4, 1–23.
  5. Alcamo, J. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 49–70.
  6. Bardgett, R.D.; van der Putten, W.H. Belowground Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Nature 2014, 515, 505–511.
  7. Wardle, D.A.; Bardgett, R.D.; Klironomos, J.N.; Setälä, H.; van der Putten, W.H.; Wall, D.H. Ecological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota. Science 2004, 304, 1629–1633.
  8. US Department of Agriculture Soil Health. Available online: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/conservation-basics/natural-resource-concerns/soils/soil-health (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  9. Lehmann, J.; Bossio, D.A.; Kögel-Knabner, I.; Rillig, M.C. The Concept and Future Prospects of Soil Health. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 544–553.
  10. Girija Veni, V.; Srinivasarao, C.; Sammi Reddy, K.; Sharma, K.L.; Rai, A. Soil Health and Climate Change. In Climate Change and Soil Interactions; Prasad, M.N.V., Pietrzykowski, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 751–767. ISBN 978-0-12-818032-7.
  11. Tripathi, A.; Pandey, V.; Ranjan, M.R. Climate Change and Its Impact on Soil Properties. In Climate Change and the Microbiome; Choudhary, D.K., Mishra, A., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 63, pp. 139–153. ISBN 978-3-030-76863-8.
  12. Rillig, M.C.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Berdugo, M.; Liu, Y.-R.; Riedo, J.; Sanz-Lazaro, C.; Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Romero, F.; Tedersoo, L.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M. Increasing the Number of Stressors Reduces Soil Ecosystem Services Worldwide. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2023, 13, 478–483.
  13. Conant, R.T.; Ryan, M.G.; Ågren, G.I.; Birge, H.E.; Davidson, E.A.; Eliasson, P.E.; Evans, S.E.; Frey, S.D.; Giardina, C.P.; Hopkins, F.M.; et al. Temperature and Soil Organic Matter Decomposition Rates - Synthesis of Current Knowledge and a Way Forward. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 3392–3404.
  14. Hopkins, F.M.; Torn, M.S.; Trumbore, S.E. Warming Accelerates Decomposition of Decades-Old Carbon in Forest Soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E1753–E1761.
  15. Lorenzen, S. The Phylogenetic Systematics of Freeliving Nematodes; Platt, H.M., Ed.; Ray Society: London, UK, 1994.
  16. Kergunteuil, A.; Campos-Herrera, R.; Sánchez-Moreno, S.; Vittoz, P.; Rasmann, S. The Abundance, Diversity, and Metabolic Footprint of Soil Nematodes Is Highest in High Elevation Alpine Grasslands. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 4.
  17. Holterman, M.; Schratzberger, M.; Helder, J. Nematodes as Evolutionary Commuters between Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial Habitats. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2019, 128, 756–767.
  18. Sapir, A. Why Are Nematodes so Successful Extremophiles? Commun. Integr. Biol. 2021, 14, 24–26.
  19. Yeates, G.W.; Bongers, T.; De Goede, R.G.; Freckman, D.W.; Georgieva, S.S. Feeding Habits in Soil Nematode Families and Genera-an Outline for Soil Ecologists. J. Nematol. 1993, 25, 315–331.
  20. Bongers, T. The Maturity Index: An Ecological Measure of Environmental Disturbance Based on Nematode Species Composition. Oecologia 1990, 83, 14–19.
  21. Yeates, G.W.; Bongers, T. Nematode Diversity in Agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 74, 113–135.
  22. Yeates, G.W. Nematodes as Soil Indicators: Functional and Biodiversity Aspects. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2003, 37, 199–210.
  23. Bongers, T.; Ferris, H. Nematode Community Structure as a Bioindicator in Environmental Monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14, 224–228.
  24. Ferris, H.; Bongers, T.; de Goede, R.G.M. A Framework for Soil Food Web Diagnostics: Extension of the Nematode Faunal Analysis Concept. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2001, 18, 13–29.
  25. Ferris, H. Contribution of Nematodes to the Structure and Function of the Soil Food Web. J. Nematol. 2010, 42, 63–67.
  26. Ferris, H.; Venette, R.C.; Scow, K.M. Soil Management to Enhance Bacterivore and Fungivore Nematode Populations and Their Nitrogen Mineralisation Function. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2004, 25, 19–35.
  27. Paul, E.A. Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry, 4th ed.; Paul, E.A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; ISBN 9780125468077.
  28. van den Hoogen, J.; Geisen, S.; Routh, D.; Ferris, H.; Traunspurger, W.; Wardle, D.A.; de Goede, R.G.M.; Adams, B.J.; Ahmad, W.; Andriuzzi, W.S.; et al. Soil Nematode Abundance and Functional Group Composition at a Global Scale. Nature 2019, 572, 194–198.
  29. Bach, E.M.; Ramirez, K.S.; Fraser, T.D.; Wall, D.H. Soil Biodiversity Integrates Solutions for a Sustainable Future. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2662.
  30. Neher, D.A. Role of Nematodes in Soil Health and Their Use as Indicators. J. Nematol. 2001, 33, 161–168.
  31. Martin, T.; Wade, J.; Singh, P.; Sprunger, C.D. The Integration of Nematode Communities into the Soil Biological Health Framework by Factor Analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 136, 108676.
  32. Sánchez-Moreno, S.; Ferris, H. Nematode Ecology and Soil Health. In Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture; Sikora, R.A., Coyne, D., Hallmann, J., Timper, P., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2018; pp. 62–86.
  33. Heděnec, P.; Jiménez, J.J.; Moradi, J.; Domene, X.; Hackenberger, D.; Barot, S.; Frossard, A.; Oktaba, L.; Filser, J.; Kindlmann, P.; et al. Global Distribution of Soil Fauna Functional Groups and Their Estimated Litter Consumption across Biomes. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17362.
  34. Wilschut, R.A.; Geisen, S. Nematodes as Drivers of Plant Performance in Natural Systems. Trends Plant. Sci. 2021, 26, 237–247.
  35. Topalović, O.; Hussain, M.; Heuer, H. Plants and Associated Soil Microbiota Cooperatively Suppress Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 313.
  36. Tu, C.; Koenning, S.R.; Hu, S. Root-Parasitic Nematodes Enhance Soil Microbial Activities and Nitrogen Mineralization. Microb. Ecol. 2003, 46, 134–144.
  37. Topalović, O.; Geisen, S. Nematodes as Suppressors and Facilitators of Plant Performance. New. Phytol. 2023, 238, 2305–2312.
  38. Nielsen, U.N.; Ayres, E.; Wall, D.H.; Li, G.; Bardgett, R.D.; Wu, T.; Garey, J.R. Global-Scale Patterns of Assemblage Structure of Soil Nematodes in Relation to Climate and Ecosystem Properties. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23, 968–978.
  39. Yan, D.; Yan, D.; Song, X.; Yu, Z.; Peng, D.; Ting, X.; Weng, B. Community Structure of Soil Nematodes under Different Drought Conditions. Geoderma 2018, 325, 110–116.
  40. Stevnbak, K.; Maraldo, K.; Georgieva, S.; Bjørnlund, L.; Beier, C.; Schmidt, I.K.; Christensen, S. Suppression of Soil Decomposers and Promotion of Long-Lived, Root Herbivorous Nematodes by Climate Change. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 2012, 52, 1–7.
  41. Ferris, H.; Griffiths, B.S.; Porazinska, D.L.; Powers, T.O.; Wang, K.-H.; Tenuta, M. Reflections on Plant and Soil Nematode Ecology: Past, Present and Future. J. Nematol. 2012, 44, 115–126.
  42. A’Bear, A.D.; Jones, T.H.; Boddy, L. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Interactions among Saprotrophic Cord-Forming Fungal Mycelia and Grazing Soil Invertebrates. Fungal Ecol. 2014, 10, 34–43.
  43. Ayres, E.; Wall, D.; Simmons, B.; Field, C.; Milchunas, D.; Morgan, J.; Roy, J. Belowground Nematode Herbivores Are Resistant to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations in Grassland Ecosystems. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 978–985.
  44. Blankinship, J.C.; Niklaus, P.A.; Hungate, B.A. A Meta-Analysis of Responses of Soil Biota to Global Change. Oecologia 2011, 165, 553–565.
  45. Cesarz, S.; Reich, P.B.; Scheu, S.; Ruess, L.; Schaefer, M.; Eisenhauer, N. Nematode Functional Guilds, Not Trophic Groups, Reflect Shifts in Soil Food Webs and Processes in Response to Interacting Global Change Factors. Pedobiologia 2015, 58, 23–32.
  46. Wall, D.H.; Nielsen, U.N.; Six, J. Soil Biodiversity and Human Health. Nature 2015, 528, 69–76.
  47. De Deyn, G.B.; Raaijmakers, C.E.; van Ruijven, J.; Berendse, F.; van der Putten, W.H. Plant Species Identity and Diversity Effects on Different Trophic Levels of Nematodes in the Soil Food Web. Oikos 2004, 106, 576–586.
  48. Wang, J.; Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Shi, X.; Hu, H.; Pan, G. Changes in Soil Nematode Abundance and Composition under Elevated and Canopy Warming in a Rice Paddy Field. Plant. Soil. 2019, 445, 425–437.
  49. Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Liu, P.; Zhou, H.; Chen, Z.; Suonan, J. Plant-Soil Mediated Effects of Long-Term Warming on Soil Nematodes of Alpine Meadows on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Biology 2022, 11, 1596.
  50. Franco, A.L.C.; Gherardi, L.A.; de Tomasel, C.M.; Andriuzzi, W.S.; Ankrom, K.E.; Shaw, E.A.; Bach, E.M.; Sala, O.E.; Wall, D.H. Drought Suppresses Soil Predators and Promotes Root Herbivores in Mesic, but Not in Xeric Grasslands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12883–12888.
  51. Franco, A.L.C.; Gherardi, L.A.; de Tomasel, C.M.; Andriuzzi, W.S.; Ankrom, K.E.; Bach, E.M.; Guan, P.; Sala, O.E.; Wall, D.H. Root Herbivory Controls the Effects of Water Availability on the Partitioning between Above- and Below-ground Grass Biomass. Funct. Ecol. 2020, 34, 2403–2410.
  52. Franco, A.L.C.; Guan, P.; Cui, S.; Tomasel, C.M.; Gherardi, L.A.; Sala, O.E.; Wall, D.H. Precipitation Effects on Nematode Diversity and Carbon Footprint across Grasslands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2022, 28, 2124–2132.
  53. Yang, Q.; Veen, G.F.; Wagenaar, R.; Manrubia, M.; ten Hooven, F.C.; van der Putten, W.H. Temporal Dynamics of Range Expander and Congeneric Native Plant Responses during and after Extreme Drought Events. Ecol. Monogr. 2022, 92, e1529.
  54. Homet, P.; Ourcival, J.-M.; Gutiérrez, E.; Domínguez-Begines, J.; Matías, L.; Godoy, O.; Gómez-Aparicio, L. Short- and Long-Term Responses of Nematode Communities to Predicted Rainfall Reduction in Mediterranean Forests. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2023, 179, 108974.
  55. Siebert, J.; Ciobanu, M.; Schädler, M.; Eisenhauer, N. Climate Change and Land Use Induce Functional Shifts in Soil Nematode Communities. Oecologia 2020, 192, 281–294.
  56. Renčo, M.; Gömöryová, E.; Čerevková, A. The Effect of Soil Type and Ecosystems on the Soil Nematode and Microbial Communities. Helminthologia 2020, 57, 129–144.
  57. Li, X.; Zhu, H.; Geisen, S.; Bellard, C.; Hu, F.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, M. Agriculture Erases Climate Constraints on Soil Nematode Communities across Large Spatial Scales. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 919–930.
  58. Krashevska, V.; Kudrin, A.A.; Widyastuti, R.; Scheu, S. Changes in Nematode Communities and Functional Diversity with the Conversion of Rainforest into Rubber and Oil Palm Plantations. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7.
  59. Yogaswara, D.A.; Kasmara, H.; Hermawan, W. Using Nematode Community to Evaluate Banana Soil Food Web in Mekargalih, Cianjur, West Java. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2021, 44, 465–483.
  60. Gao, D.; Wang, F.; Li, J.; Yu, S.; Li, Z.; Zhao, J. Soil Nematode Communities as Indicators of Soil Health in Different Land Use Types in Tropical Area. Nematology 2020, 22, 595–610.
  61. Wang, B.; Wu, L.; Chen, D.; Wu, Y.; Hu, S.; Li, L.; Bai, Y. Grazing Simplifies Soil Micro-food Webs and Decouples Their Relationships with Ecosystem Functions in Grasslands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 960–970.
  62. Han, X.; Li, Y.; Du, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Li, Q. Effect of Grassland Degradation on Soil Quality and Soil Biotic Community in a Semi-Arid Temperate Steppe. Ecol. Process. 2020, 9, 63.
  63. Vazquez, C.; Goede, R.G.M.; Korthals, G.W.; Rutgers, M.; Schouten, A.J.; Creamer, R. The Effects of Increasing Land Use Intensity on Soil Nematodes: A Turn towards Specialism. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 2003–2016.
  64. Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Ren, Z.; Hu, Z.; Tian, S.; Fan, W.; Chen, X.; Griffiths, B.S.; Hu, F.; Liu, M. Root Traits Mediate Functional Guilds of Soil Nematodes in an Ex-Arable Field. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 108038.
  65. Puissant, J.; Villenave, C.; Chauvin, C.; Plassard, C.; Blanchart, E.; Trap, J. Quantification of the Global Impact of Agricultural Practices on Soil Nematodes: A Meta-Analysis. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2021, 161, 108383.
  66. Xiong, D.; Wei, C.; Wang, X.; Lü, X.; Fang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Liang, W.; Han, X.; Bezemer, T.M.; et al. Spatial Patterns and Ecological Drivers of Soil Nematode Β-diversity in Natural Grasslands Vary among Vegetation Types and Trophic Position. J. Anim. Ecol. 2021, 90, 1367–1378.
  67. Wang, B.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, D.; Wu, Y.; Wu, L.; Liu, S.; Yue, L.; Wang, Y.; Bai, Y. Even Short-term Revegetation Complicates Soil Food Webs and Strengthens Their Links with Ecosystem Functions. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 59, 1721–1733.
  68. Yin, H.; Su, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Fan, C.; Guan, P.; Xie, Z.; Wang, S.; Scheu, S.; et al. Consistent Response of Nematode Communities to Management of Coniferous Plantations. For. Ecosyst. 2022, 9, 100045.
  69. Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Yang, R.; Xiao, D.; He, X.; Wang, K. Grass Harvesting Eliminates the Beneficial Effects of Legume Addition on Soil Nematode Communities in a Tall Grass Pasture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 349, 108468.
  70. Trap, J.; Ranoarisoa, M.P.; Raharijaona, S.; Rabeharisoa, L.; Plassard, C.; Mayad, E.H.; Bernard, L.; Becquer, T.; Blanchart, E. Agricultural Practices Modulate the Beneficial Activity of Bacterial-Feeding Nematodes for Plant Growth and Nutrition: Evidence from an Original Intact Soil Core Technique. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7181.
  71. Chen, D.; Xing, W.; Lan, Z.; Saleem, M.; Wu, Y.; Hu, S.; Bai, Y. Direct and Indirect Effects of Nitrogen Enrichment on Soil Organisms and Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization in a Semi-arid Grassland. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 175–187.
  72. Shaw, E.A.; Boot, C.M.; Moore, J.C.; Wall, D.H.; Baron, J.S. Long-Term Nitrogen Addition Shifts the Soil Nematode Community to Bacterivore-Dominated and Reduces Its Ecological Maturity in a Subalpine Forest. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2019, 130, 177–184.
  73. Liu, T.; Mao, P.; Shi, L.; Eisenhauer, N.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; He, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Z.; et al. Forest Canopy Maintains the Soil Community Composition under Elevated Nitrogen Deposition. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2020, 143, 107733.
  74. Xiao, H.; Wang, B.; Lu, S.; Chen, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, S.; Bai, Y. Soil Acidification Reduces the Effects of Short-term Nutrient Enrichment on Plant and Soil Biota and Their Interactions in Grasslands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 4626–4637.
  75. Wan, B.; Hu, Z.; Liu, T.; Yang, Q.; Li, D.; Zhang, C.; Chen, X.; Hu, F.; Kardol, P.; Griffiths, B.S.; et al. Organic Amendments Increase the Flow Uniformity of Energy across Nematode Food Webs. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2022, 170, 108695.
  76. Varga, I.; Benković-Lačić, T.; Lončarić, Z.; Popović, B.; Brmež, M. Liming, Phosphorus and Zinc Influence on Soil Nematode Community Structure at Hot Pepper. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 46, 65–71.
  77. Olatunji, O.A.; Gong, S.; Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Sun, X.; Chen, W.; Zhang, L.; Dakhil, M.A.; Huang, D.; Tan, X. The Effect of Phosphorus Addition, Soil Moisture, and Plant Type on Soil Nematode Abundance and Community Composition. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 1139–1150.
  78. Caruso, T.; Hogg, I.D.; Nielsen, U.N.; Bottos, E.M.; Lee, C.K.; Hopkins, D.W.; Cary, S.C.; Barrett, J.E.; Green, T.G.A.; Storey, B.C.; et al. Nematodes in a Polar Desert Reveal the Relative Role of Biotic Interactions in the Coexistence of Soil Animals. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 63.
  79. Li, X.; Chen, X.; Zhu, H.; Ren, Z.; Jiao, J.; Hu, F.; Liu, M. Effects of Historical Legacies on Soil Nematode Communities Are Mediated by Contemporary Environmental Conditions. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 6732–6740.
  80. Neilson, R.; Caul, S.; Fraser, F.C.; King, D.; Mitchell, S.M.; Roberts, D.M.; Giles, M.E. Microbial Community Size Is a Potential Predictor of Nematode Functional Group in Limed Grasslands. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2020, 156, 103702.
  81. Xiong, D.; Wei, C.; Wubs, E.R.J.; Veen, G.F.; Liang, W.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Putten, W.H.; Han, X. Nonlinear Responses of Soil Nematode Community Composition to Increasing Aridity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2020, 29, 117–126.
  82. Siebert, J.; Sünnemann, M.; Auge, H.; Berger, S.; Cesarz, S.; Ciobanu, M.; Guerrero-Ramírez, N.R.; Eisenhauer, N. The Effects of Drought and Nutrient Addition on Soil Organisms Vary across Taxonomic Groups, but Are Constant across Seasons. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 639.
  83. Thakur, M.P.; Del Real, I.M.; Cesarz, S.; Steinauer, K.; Reich, P.B.; Hobbie, S.; Ciobanu, M.; Rich, R.; Worm, K.; Eisenhauer, N. Soil Microbial, Nematode, and Enzymatic Responses to Elevated CO2, N Fertilization, Warming, and Reduced Precipitation. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 184–193.
  84. Zhang, G.; Sui, X.; Li, Y.; Jia, M.; Wang, Z.; Han, G.; Wang, L. The Response of Soil Nematode Fauna to Climate Drying and Warming in Stipa Breviflora Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 2166–2180.
  85. Nisa, R.U.; Tantray, A.Y.; Kouser, N.; Allie, K.A.; Wani, S.M.; Alamri, S.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Shah, A.A. Influence of Ecological and Edaphic Factors on Biodiversity of Soil Nematodes. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3049–3059.
  86. Wang, H.; Liu, G.; Huang, B.; Wang, X.; Xing, Y.; Wang, Q. Long-Term Nitrogen Addition and Precipitation Reduction Decrease Soil Nematode Community Diversity in a Temperate Forest. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2021, 162, 103895.
  87. Li, J.; Zhao, J.; Liao, X.; Yi, Q.; Zhang, W.; Lin, H.; Liu, K.; Peng, P.; Wang, K. Long-Term Returning Agricultural Residues Increases Soil Microbe-Nematode Network Complexity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality. Geoderma 2023, 430, 116340.
  88. Ferris, H. Form and Function: Metabolic Footprints of Nematodes in the Soil Food Web. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 2010, 46, 97–104.
  89. Zhang, X.; Ferris, H.; Mitchell, J.; Liang, W. Ecosystem Services of the Soil Food Web after Long-Term Application of Agricultural Management Practices. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2017, 111, 36–43.
  90. Wood, J.R.; Holdaway, R.J.; Orwin, K.H.; Morse, C.; Bonner, K.I.; Davis, C.; Bolstridge, N.; Dickie, I.A. No Single Driver of Biodiversity: Divergent Responses of Multiple Taxa across Land Use Types. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01997.
  91. Bender, S.F.; Wagg, C.; van der Heijden, M.G.A. An Underground Revolution: Biodiversity and Soil Ecological Engineering for Agricultural Sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016, 31, 440–452.
  92. van den Hoogen, J.; Geisen, S.; Wall, D.H.; Wardle, D.A.; Traunspurger, W.; de Goede, R.G.M.; Adams, B.J.; Ahmad, W.; Ferris, H.; Bardgett, R.D.; et al. A Global Database of Soil Nematode Abundance and Functional Group Composition. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 103.
  93. Karuri, H. Nematode Community Structure and Functional Guilds Differ in Tea Fields and Tropical Forest. Geoderma 2021, 392, 115006.
  94. Jiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Han, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, T. Nematodes and Their Bacterial Prey Improve Phosphorus Acquisition by Wheat. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 974–986.
  95. Zheng, J.; Dini-Andreote, F.; Luan, L.; Geisen, S.; Xue, J.; Li, H.; Sun, B.; Jiang, Y. Nematode Predation and Competitive Interactions Affect Microbe-Mediated Phosphorus Dynamics. mBio 2022, 13, 3.
  96. Chen, X.; Xue, W.; Xue, J.; Griffiths, B.S.; Liu, M. Contribution of Bacterivorous Nematodes to Soil Resistance and Resilience under Copper or Heat Stress. Soil. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 2, 220–229.
  97. da Silva, J.V.C.d.L.; Hirschfeld, M.N.C.; Cares, J.E.; Esteves, A.M. Land Use, Soil Properties and Climate Variables Influence the Nematode Communities in the Caatinga Dry Forest. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2020, 150, 103474.
  98. Bastida, F.; Eldridge, D.J.; Abades, S.; Alfaro, F.D.; Gallardo, A.; García-Velázquez, L.; García, C.; Hart, S.C.; Pérez, C.A.; Santos, F.; et al. Climatic Vulnerabilities and Ecological Preferences of Soil Invertebrates across Biomes. Mol. Ecol. 2020, 29, 752–761.
  99. Majdi, N.; Traunspurger, W.; Fueser, H.; Gansfort, B.; Laffaille, P.; Maire, A. Effects of a Broad Range of Experimental Temperatures on the Population Growth and Body-Size of Five Species of Free-Living Nematodes. J. Biol. 2019, 80, 21–36.
  100. Andriuzzi, W.S.; Franco, A.L.C.; Ankrom, K.E.; Cui, S.; de Tomasel, C.M.; Guan, P.; Gherardi, L.A.; Sala, O.E.; Wall, D.H. Body Size Structure of Soil Fauna along Geographic and Temporal Gradients of Precipitation in Grasslands. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2020, 140, 107638.
  101. Wilschut, R.A.; Geisen, S.; Martens, H.; Kostenko, O.; Hollander, M.; Hooven, F.C.; Weser, C.; Snoek, L.B.; Bloem, J.; Caković, D.; et al. Latitudinal Variation in Soil Nematode Communities under Climate Warming-related Range-expanding and Native Plants. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2714–2726.
  102. Wang, X.; Xiao, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Du, G.; Zhang, L.; Guo, A.; Chen, S.; Nielsen, U.N. Dominant Plant Species Influence Nematode Richness by Moderating Understory Diversity and Microbial Assemblages. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2019, 137, 107566.
  103. Bennett, J.A.; Koch, A.M.; Forsythe, J.; Johnson, N.C.; Tilman, D.; Klironomos, J. Resistance of Soil Biota and Plant Growth to Disturbance Increases with Plant Diversity. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 23, 119–128.
  104. Wu, L.; Chen, H.; Chen, D.; Wang, S.; Wu, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, S.; Yue, L.; Yu, J.; Bai, Y. Soil Biota Diversity and Plant Diversity Both Contributed to Ecosystem Stability in Grasslands. Ecol. Lett. 2023, 26, 858–868.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback