2. Heavy Metal Stress Tolerance
Soil is a reservoir of several heavy metals that are required in microquantities to meet plants’ nutritional needs. Many of these metals, when present in higher concentrations due to either anthropogenic sources
[15][16][17][18][15,16,17,18] or geological distribution, negatively affect plant growth and development. The metal stress leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species, which interfere with the structure and function of macromolecules, including lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids
[19]. The metals in their high concentrations can also limit the rhizobial interaction with the host, resulting in a reduction of nodule number and nitrogen-fixating activity
[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. A constant threat to mutualism seems to have led to the development of metal-tolerating strategies in rhizobia. The bacteria isolated from heavy-metal soils often tend to tolerate relatively higher levels of the metals
[29]. Numerous studies suggest that such rhizobia provide hosts with the ability to tolerate stress caused by many toxic metals, such as cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), aluminum (Al), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), etc. (
Table 1). There was a significant improvement in growth, development, and yield in several leguminous crops under heavy metal regimes when inoculated with appropriate rhizobial species. A symbiotic opportunity for legumes with naturally occurring metal-tolerating rhizobia allows them to take roots, thus promoting their diversification in such environments
[30].
The genetic mechanism of the metal-tolerating ability of symbionts indicates an intricate network of multiple genes that relate to biosorption, localized accumulation, detoxification, RNA methylation, expression of antioxidant genes, hormone synthesis, and improving membrane stability. The presence of an efflux system, which reduces accumulation, has been a common strategy used by the rhizobia against several heavy metals. Some rhizobial symbionts have high Ni biosorption and storage capabilities, limiting their mobility in the plant
[31][32][31,32]. A strong positive relationship between low concentrations of As in the shoots of
Medicago truncatula and reduced expression of the plant’s NRT3.1-like gene, which is a nitrate transporter, has been reported
[33]. The expression of this transporter gene was induced by abscisic acid, but ammonium, which is the fixed form of nitrogen in
Rhizobium, had an antagonistic effect. The
Bradyrhizobium canariense L-7AH strain that was isolated from a metal mining site effectively formed a symbiotic relationship with the legume
Lupinus albus at high concentrations of Hg (up to 102 mg kg
−1 vermiculite) with no apparent reduction in photosynthesis or nitrogenase activities
[34]. The tolerance mechanism of the strain is not clear; however, in another study, the
Ensifer medicae strain mediated an increase in mercuric reductase activity in
M. truncatula nodules to convert the highly toxic mercuric cation to a less toxic volatile mercury metal
[35]. A positive correlation between
Rhizobium-induced differential methylation and expression of m6A RNA in soybean plants under Cd stress indicates a different mechanism of metal toxicity remediation
[36]. Rhizobia-induced accumulation of Cu in
M. sativa roots and increased expression of antioxidants have also been observed
[37]. Another mechanism of excess Cu tolerance involves Cu homeostasis catalyzed by the multicopper oxidase CuO and a copper chaperone
[38]. Legumes that can grow successfully in Al-stressed soil have evolved specific tolerance mechanisms such as prevention of metal uptake through the cell membrane and increased production of extracellular exopolysaccharides
[39]. In a recent study, the differentially expressed genes under Al stress were linked to extracellular EPS, biofilm formation and cell membrane-stabilizing proteins in
Rhizobium phaseoli [40].
With the recent advances in recombinant technology, genetic improvements in the symbiotic rhizobia for improved metal stress tolerance in legumes may be a way forward. In this context, the intrinsic abilities of rhizobial and non-rhizobial species that can tolerate metal-induced stresses may be considered as resources for the exploitation of novel metal-tolerant factors that can be used in different legumes and perhaps non-legume plants. For instance, genetically improved
Rhizobium pusense KG2, a Cd
2+ immobilizing strain, exhibited a substantial reduction in Cd absorption while enhancing root and shoot length, biomass, nitrogen contents, and superoxide dismutase activity
[41]. After transferring the arsenite S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase gene from
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii into
Rhizobium leguminosarum, there was an enhanced As tolerance in the
Rhizobium, which methylated and volatilized the heavy metal
[42]. This is an example that provides a sustainable remediation strategy for As-contaminated soils. Thus, recombinant DNA technology-based exploitation of metal resistance genes from other organisms, such as Cr resistance genes from
Akaligenes eutrophus [43], is a promising technology for developing tolerant legumes of agricultural and ecological importance.
Table 1. A list of some symbiotic rhizobia that confers stress metal stress tolerance to legumes.
3. Tolerance to Drought, Salinity, and pH
Stresses caused by environmental factors such as drought, salinity, heat, and extremes of pH are among the major factors affecting plant growth and development. These environmental factors may exacerbate with the changing climate, thereby causing an adverse impact on agricultural production. The rhizobial symbionts that can confer legumes with tolerance against different types of stresses have been summarized in
Table 2.
Drought reduces transpiration and water movement in legumes, thus restricting the circulation of nitrogen fixation products and inhibiting nitrogenase activity
[57][58][59][60][57,58,59,60]. It also reduces biomass and chlorophyll contents and accumulates reactive oxygen species that can disrupt the functioning of different biomolecules including DNA
[61][62][63][61,62,63]. Production of antioxidants (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbic acid, and glutathione) and osmoprotectants (molecules that maintain the balance of osmotic potential in cells) are among the common responses to drought stress in most legumes
[62]. There are many examples of rhizobial symbionts that confer drought tolerance to legumes, such as
B. diazoefficiens SEMIA 5080 in soybean R01-581F,
Mesorhizobium huakuii 7653R in
Astragalus sinicus L., and
S. medicae or
S. meliloti in
M. truncatula [64][65][66][64,65,66]. Inoculation of
R. meliloti in kidney bean, black bean, mung bean, and chickpea increased the number of nodules and improved photosynthesis under water-deficient conditions
[67]. Similarly,
S. fredii strain SMH12 was shown to improve the number of nodules and the water potentials in soybean grown under drought stress
[68]. Rhizobium-induced increases in antioxidant enzyme production
[69], accumulation of osmoprotectants including proline and soluble sugars in nodules and roots
[70], or genes that encode enzymes involved in trehalose synthesis
[71] were associated with drought stress.
Soil salinity, which is strongly related to drought and gets intensified with the use of saline water for irrigation
[72][73][74][75][72,73,74,75], is among the key factors affecting the efficiency of legume–rhizobia symbiosis
[76]. It causes the accumulation of toxic ions in soil
[77] and is correlated with poor-quality flavonoids in the root exudates of legumes, which affect the production of nod factors
[78]. By influencing the early stage of legume–rhizobia interaction involving chemical communication and colonization or infection of root hairs, salt stress can result in poor establishment of legume–rhizobia symbiosis. The reduction in rhizobial infections under salt stress was observed in many legumes such as bean
[79], soybean
[80], pea
[81], and chickpea
[82], which resulted in reduced nitrogen fixation
[83]. Some rhizobia are able to modulate the host’s response to salinity by inducing indole-3-acetic acid production and accumulation of osmoprotectant molecules
[84], increasing root osmotic water flow via reducing xylem osmotic potential and increasing the amount of aquaporins
[85], and changing the protein profile of the host plant
[86]. It is unclear if the production of nod factors under high salt conditions would be as effective as in the normal situation although some similarities have been noticed
[87].
pH is known to influence soil properties and nutrient availability, and hence the functioning of the soil microbial community. Most soil microbes including root-nodulating rhizobia prefer a near-neutral pH, whereas a large proportion of the global arable land is either acidic or alkaline
[88]. Extreme pH conditions can affect the establishment of legume–rhizobia symbiosis
[89], as a delay in nodulation under acidic conditions has been observed in many legume plants
[90]. The fact that supplementation of molecules such as genistein, a nod gene inducer that reverses the effects of acidic conditions on the establishment of legume–rhizobia symbiosis
[91], suggests that expression of symbiosis signals is influenced by pH
[92][93][94][92,93,94]. Soil pH can also influence the structure of the rhizosphere community
[95], which can have a significant influence on plant roots
[96][97][96,97]. The legumes thriving in acidic soils have evolved tolerance mechanisms for soil acidic conditions through the production of nod factors that are different from those produced under neutral pH conditions
[98]. The studies indicate a role for the rhizobia-specific genes actA, typA, atvA, lpiA, and ubiF in improving acid stress tolerance and symbiotic competitiveness
[99][100][101][102][99,100,101,102].
R. tropici CIAT899, a highly acid-tolerant strain
[103], induces the production of glutathione
[104]. The bacterium could produce more (~1.8-fold) Nod factors in acidic than neutral growth conditions, and about half of them were different from the normal profile
[98]. The rhizobial strains have displayed tolerance to conditions ranging from highly acidic
[105][106][105,106] to highly alkaline
[107]. The defense response to high pH includes an increase in antioxidants, organic acid production, and changes in certain proteins
[108].
Species that are naturally tolerant to environmental stress could be exploited for developing tolerant rhizobial strains. Alternatively, a genetic engineering route could be adopted for strain improvement, as has been demonstrated through overproduction of cytokinin, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase, high-affinity cytochrome cbb3-type oxidase, indole-3 acetic acid, and flavodoxin
[109][110][111][112][113][114][109,110,111,112,113,114].
Table 2. Symbiotic rhizobia that confer environmental stress tolerance to legumes.
Symbiotic Rhizobia |
Co-Inoculants |
Legume Host |
Stress |
Beneficial Effects on the Plant |
Reference |
Mesorhizobium huakuii strain 7653R |
|
Astragalus sinicus |
Drought |
Improved N fixation and NH | 4+ | assimilation |
[65] |
Sinorhizobium medicae or S. meliloti |
|
Medicago truncatula |
Enhanced allocation of reserves to osmolytes |
[66] |
Sinorhizobium meliloti |
|
Kidney bean, black bean, mung bean, and chickpea |
Improved nodule number and photosynthesis |
[67] |
Rhizobium meliloti |
|
Medicago sativa |
Enhanced antioxidants |
[69] |
Sinorhizobium fredii strain SMH12 |
|
Soybean |
Improved nodule number and water potentials |
[68] |
Rhizobium leguminosarum |
|
Faba bean |
Enhanced production of osmoprotectants |
[70] |
Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 |
Paenibacillus polymyxa | spp. |
Phaselus vulgaris |
Increased leaf abscisic acid content |
[115] |
IAA-overproducing | Ensifer meliloti 1021 (Ms-RD64) |
|
Medicago sativa |
Enhanced production of low-molecular-weight osmolytes |
[109] |
Bradyrhizobium | sp. | SUTN9-2 |
|
Mung bean |
Enhanced ACC deaminase activity |
[110] |
Rhizobium etli |
|
Phaseolus vulgaris |
Overexpressed Trehalose-6-Phosphate Synthase |
[111] |
Rhizobium etli |
|
Phaseolus vulgaris |
Enhanced expression of Cytochrome cbb(3) oxidases |
[112] |
Sinorhizobium meliloti |
|
Alfalfa |
Overexpressed cytokinin and antioxidant enzymes |
[113] |
Bradyrhizobium RJS9-2 |
|
Stylosanthes guianensis |
Salinity |
Induced IAA production, enhanced osmoprotectant accumulation |
[84] |
Rhizobium leguminosarum |
|
Phaseolus vulgaris |
Contributed to enhanced root osmotic water flow |
[85] |
Rhizobium phaseoli M1, M6, and M9 |
Pseudomonas | spp. |
Mung bean |
Expressed ACC deaminase |
[116] |
Mesorhizobium ciceri IC53 |
Bacilus subtilis | NUU4 |
Cicer arietinum. |
Increased proline contents |
[117] |
Rhizobium meliloti |
|
Medicago sativa |
Modulated key plant processes (efficient use of resources, oxidative stress, ion homeostasis) |
[87] |
Sinorhizobium meliloti |
|
|
Overexpressed flavodoxin (Cyanobacterial origin) |
[114] |
Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 |
|
Phaseolus vulgaris |
pH |
Modulated rhizobial nod factors production |
[98] |
Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 |
|
Phaseolus vulgaris |
Induced production of glutathione in beans |
[118] |
Sinorhizobium meliloti |
|
Medicago sativa |
|
Adaptive acid-tolerance response |
[105] |
Rhizobium | spp. |
|
Medicago sativa Longmu 806 |
Antioxidants and organic acids production |
[108] |