Nanocomposites of Ferrites with TiO, SiO: Comparison
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jessie Wu and Version 1 by Manpreet Kaur.

Ferrites are important magnetic materials used in electronic devices. Nanocomposites of ferrites with TiO2 has gained interest due to its unique advantages, such as high chemical stability, surface-active sites, high specific surface area, non-toxicity, excellent optical properties, and tunable porosity.

  • ferrites
  • carbon quantum dots
  • photocatalysis
  • TiO2
  • SiO2
  • Nanocomposites

1. Introduction

TiO2 has four polymorphs: brookite (orthorhombic), rutile (tetragonal), anatase (tetragonal) and TiO2-B. Anatase, rutile, and brookite phases have bandgaps of 3.2, 3.0, and 3.4 eV, respectively. Brookite is less thermodynamically stable, but rutile is stable and anatase is metastable. At temperatures exceeding 600 °C, irreversible conversion of brookite and anatase TiO2 to rutile occurs [44][1].
It has been observed that bandgaps of TiO2 nanoparticles with 5–10 nm particles narrow up to 0.2 eV. Anatase is the most photocatalytically effective phase of TiO2 [45][2] and is widely used in semiconducting materials for environmental applications [46][3]. It has higher mobility of electron–hole pairs and higher surface hydroxyl density. Brookite-phase activity has not been thoroughly examined [47,48][4][5]. Rutile TiO2 is usually investigated in fundamental investigations. Due to the existence of oxygen vacancies, TiO2 is classed as an n-type semiconductor [49][6]. Because crystalline TiO2 has a less photoexcited electron–hole recombination than amorphous TiO2, it has higher photocatalytic activity [50,51][7][8]. Recombination of photogenerated charge carriers is a disadvantage of TiO2 photocatalysts, as it decreases overall reaction quantum efficiency [52][9]. During the recombination processes, the photoexcited electrons return to the valence band non-radiatively or radiatively [53,54,55][10][11][12]. An attractive feature of the TiO2 photocatalyst is its potential to be activated by visible light. To increase photocatalytic activity and decrease recombination of photoexcited charge carriers, several methods have been followed, such as heterojunction formation and doping with non-metals, metals, and nanosized crystals, which can alter the electronic and optical properties of TiO2 [56,57,58,59,60][13][14][15][16][17]. By using dopants in TiO2, its bandgap reduces [61][18]. Metal doping has long been known to improve visible light absorbance of TiO2 [62,63][19][20] and increase its photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation [63[20][21][22][23],64,65,66], but the introduction of metal ion results in thermal instability, which reduces the reuse of TiO2 photocatalyst and recombination of electron–hole pairs occur at a fast rate. Non-metal doping is more efficient than metal ion doping due to more thermal stability and less formation of recombination centers [67,68,69,70,71][24][25][26][27][28].
Nanocomposites of ferrites with TiO2 have been synthesized using different chemical methods. A summary of methods used to synthesize magnetic nanocomposites has been discussed in this section.

2. Sol–Gel Method

In typical sol–gel synthesis, formation of gel materials with three-dimensional structure occurs by condensation and hydrolysis reaction of metal ions. It is an irreversible process: once gel is formed, it cannot break down. There is covalent interaction between gel particles. In this method, huge precursors are used during conversions and can be performed at or near room temperature. For chemical catalysts, porous ceramic xerogels with large surface area act as support and thin-film deposition is important for material possessing desired optical and magnetic properties [24][29]. This method uses simple equipment, produces highly homogeneous and pure products at low temperatures, and allows modification of the surface.
Tatarchuk et al. [72][30] developed magnetic nanocomposites of CoFe2O4@TiO2 using the Pechini sol–gel method with ethylene glycol and citric acid as chelating agents and titanium (IV) polymeric precursor solution. XRD study of CoFe2O4@TiO2 indicated the presence of 46% and 54% of anatase and rutile crystal phase, respectively, in the titanium dioxide (TiO2) component, and the average size of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) and TiO2 nanoparticles was about 30 and 8 nm, respectively. SEM revealed that because of deposition of TiO2 on the CoFe2O4 surface, particles became large. The IR spectrum of the nanocomposite illustrated the shift of bands, which was the result of isomorphic heterovalent substitution in the octahedral position. Dadfar et al. [73][31] and Xu et al. [74][32] fabricated SrFe12O19/TiO2 and TiO2/ZnFe2O4 nanostructures by the sol–gel method. XRD indicated the presence of impurity phases (�-Fe2O3) at pH 2.5 and 4.5, while pure SrFe12O19 and TiO2 phases were formed at pH 3.5. The production of the rutile phase was prohibited to some extent by highly dispersed ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles in TiO2/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposites. TEM confirmed average particle sizes of 15–75 nm of SrFe12O19/TiO2 and uniform attachment of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles to TiO2 nanoparticles to produce a coupled semiconductor. The electron diffraction pattern displayed very weak intensity of the electron diffraction pattern for the ZnFe2O4 phase, which was attributed to the dispersion of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles amid the TiO2 nanoparticles. The value of saturation magnetization, remnant magnetization, and coercivity decreased with increasing amounts of TiO2 in TiO2/ZnFe2O4, due to the contribution of the non-magnetic TiO2 component to total sample volume.
Lahijani et al. [75][33] fabricated a PbFe12O19-TiO2 nanocomposite using the sol–gel method. From XRD analysis, the average size of crystals was found to be 88 nm. FTIR study indicated that absorption bands at 544, 716, 935 and 1401 nm−1 corresponded to stretching modes of Fe-O, Ti-O, Pb-O and C-C bonds, respectively. Heating the compound in the presence of a polyhydroxy alcohol, such as ethylene glycol, promotes polymerization. The metal ions are equally dispersed inside the organic matrix, resulting in a homogeneous resin—the polymeric precursor [76][34]. The immobilization of metal complexes in such rigid organic polymeric networks can decrease segregation of specific metals, ensuring molecular compositional uniformity. Polymeric precursors can be used to make ferrite–TiO2 nanocomposites. Mouro et al. [77][35] used a polymeric precursor technique to make nanometric TiO2/CoFe2O4 composites. X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, surface area through N2 physisorption, zeta potential, scanning and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy were used to characterize the as-prepared sample. The lack of a rutile phase in the nanocomposites was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy. XRD patterns revealed that thermal treatment did not cause phase segregation. The synthesized nanocomposites showed an increase in surface area, a change in surface charge in relation to pure TiO2, and selectivity in the photodegradation. The materials had photocatalytic activity due to the presence of TiO2 on their surfaces, and CoFe2O4 cores were beneficial for separating and recovering photocatalysts after use in an oxidative process.

3. Ultrasonic Method

The ultrasonic technique involves using sound energy to agitate the particles in a solution, resulting in physical and chemical changes. This method is found to be the most promising method for manufacturing nanocomposites such as oxides, carbides, alloys and colloids with almost uniform distribution of nanoparticles [78][36]. Ultrasound irradiation causes unstable bubbles in liquids to form, grow, and collapse rapidly at temperatures as high as 5000 K, pressures as high as 20 MPa, and cooling speeds of 1010 Ks−1 [79][37]. Ultrasonication was used for the synthesis of titania-coated γ-Fe2O3 magnetic activated carbon and Fe3O4-TiO2 photocatalyst with saturation magnetization value of 2.21 and 14 emug−1, respectively [80,81][38][39]. XRD revealed that the titania coated on the magnetic activated carbon maintained the anatase phase, with the same set of characterization peaks for both Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-TiO2, indicating that the ultrasound irradiation had no effect on the crystal structure of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The tiny crystallite size was shown by the broad nature peak of the deposited TiO2 on Fe3O4-TiO2. SEM revealed the homogeneous distribution of titania. Superparamagnetic characteristics of Fe3O4-TiO2 photocatalyst at room temperature were confirmed by a magnetization hysteresis loop. HRTEM analysis showed the occurrence of a heterojunction in the Fe3O4-TiO2 nanocomposite. XPS showed that the peaks at 710.5 eV and 458.8 eV originated from Fe 2p and Ti 2p energy levels, respectively, implying that Fe3O4 and TiO2 were largely present as separated phases in Fe3O4-TiO2 composites.

4. Coprecipitation Method

This approach requires the preparation of a mixed aqueous solution of starting chemicals such as chlorides, nitrates, or sulfites of Fe3+, as well as of divalent metal ions in the requisite stoichiometric ratio. The precipitates are then generated by treating the solution with NaOH, filtration, washing twice, and drying. This approach entails four steps: nucleation, growth, coarsening, and agglomeration, all occurring at the same time [82][40]. Nanocomposites of ferrites of good quality and phase purity can be obtained by this method. This process offers various advantages such as high yield, high product purity, lack of necessity to use organic solvent, good reproducibility and low cost. It is a quick and easy way to make ultrafine particles that are disseminated in a variety of media. By carefully monitoring the preparation parameters, it is possible to achieve control over the surface morphology, structure, and chemical composition with this procedure.
Coprecipitation was employed for fabrication of CoFe2O4/TiO2 and ZnFe2O4-TiO2 nanocatalysts [83,84][41][42]. The average particle size of the coprecipitated nanocatalysts was 50 nm for CoFe2O4 and 150 nm for CoFe2O4/TiO2 according to SEM images, which was consistent with the crystallite size predicted from XRD data. The spherical geometry (9 ± 2 nm) of ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles and spherical-like morphology (11 ± 3 nm) of ZnFe2O4-TiO2 nanocomposites and fine dispersion of black particles (CoFe2O4) on the gray surface (TiO2) of CoFe2O4/TiO2 were depicted in the TEM images. Bandgaps of CoFe2O4/TiO2, CoFe2O4, ZnFe2O4-TiO2, and ZnFe2O4 were found to be 2.8, 1.1, 2.3, and 2.1 eV, respectively, which suggested the formation of a visible light-active photocatalyst. The large bandgap of the composite may be due to the mixing effect of the bandgap and the interfacial coupling effect between ZnFe2O4 and TiO2, CoFe2O4 and TiO2. XRD pattern analysis revealed that in CoFe2O4/TiO2, the conversion of anatase to the rutile phase of TiO2 happened at a TiO2 annealing temperature of ≤600 °C, confirming the purity of ZnFe2O4 and TiO2 phase in ZnFe2O4-TiO2, which was in agreement with HRTEM and SAED investigations. Haw et al. [85][43] found that in comparison to conventional rutile-phase TiO2 and pure urchin-like TiO2 (3D TiO2) microparticles, nanocomposites of CoFe2O4-3D TiO2 showed an increase in photodegradation of methylene blue, and this nanocomposite demonstrated a generally constant photocatalytic efficacy with low degradation. Two sets of lattice fringes were visible at the TiO2-CoFe2O4 interface, with d110 = 0.322 nm of rutile phase titania and d331 = 0.193 nm of CoFe2O4. The CoFe2O4 nanoparticles were clearly visible on the 3D urchin-like TiO2 structure, and each element was uniformly distributed over the surface of the TiO2 microsphere on scanning transmission electron microscopy. XRD peaks were designated to the rutile phase of 3D urchin-like TiO2 and broader peaks confirmed the presence of nanosized CoFe2O4 in the sample.

5. Hydrothermal Method

The hydrothermal method is a way of crystallizing a chemical, utilizing an aqueous solution at a high vapor pressure as well as temperature [86][44]. At standard temperatures (100 °C) and pressures (<1 atm), it is generally depicted as crystal formation or crystal synthesis from insoluble chemicals. Autoclaves are used to carry out the process, which is performed at a controlled pressure and temperature. This enables the utilization of temperatures that are higher than the boiling point of water or an organic solution. The concoction reaction that occurs beyond the dissolvable breaking point and at pressures over bar is known as hydrothermal synthesis. The hydrothermal technique has the following advantages: it is simple to acquire nanotube morphology, variations in the synthesis process may be used to improve TiO2 nanotube characteristics, and it is a method that can be used for a variety of applications.
Hydrothermal deposition of a hard ferromagnetic strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) over TiO2 can result in a photocatalyst that is both ferromagnetic and visible light-active. The TiO2-supported SrFe12O19 nanocomposite has a strong ferromagnetic property and is quite stable when it comes to losing its magnetic property. XRD images of TiO2-supported SrFe12O19 nanocomposite correspond to mixture of anatase and rutile crystal phases. EDS results confirmed that TiO2-supported SrFe12O19 consists of Fe, Ti, Sr, C, O and Si. The BET-specific surface area of TiO2 was 49.5 m2g−1 with a total pore volume of 0.1553 cm3g−1, which compares with 38.3 m2g−1 and 0.0155 cm3g−1 for TiO2-supported SrFe12O19. Due to the deposition of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles onto the TiO2, the surface area and pore volume of the TiO2 nanocomposite reduces. The paramagnetic impact of TiO2 lowered the coercivity (HC) and saturation magnetization (MS) of TiO2-supported SrFe12O19. The photocatalyst TiO2-supported SrFe12O19 had HC of 2125.5 G. The coercivity of TiO2-supported SrFe12O19 nanocomposite showed that it was a good ferromagnetic material [87][45]. Nguyen and Doong [88][46] and Pongwan et al. [89][47] fabricated ZnFe2O4-TiO2 and CoFe2O4/TiO2 nanostructure photocatalysts by the hydrothermal method. The ZnFe2O4-TiO2 nanocomposite was prepared by coupling 0.2–2 wt % narrow-bandgap material of p-type ZnFe2O4 with n-type anatase TiO2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM confirmed average particle sizes of 8–9 nm and 5–35 nm for ZnFe2O4-TiO2 and CoFe2O4/TiO2, respectively. It was observed that ZnFe2O4 and TiO2 were intimately linked, which led to a decrease in electron–hole recombination rate as well as enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnFe2O4-TiO2 heterostructures under visible light irradiation. When the loading amount of ZnFe2O4 increased from 0.5 to 2 wt %, SEM revealed a slight increase in particle size of ZnFe2O4-TiO2 nanocomposites. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms showed that the combination of TiO2 with ZnFe2O4 can increase the specific surface area. XRD analysis indicated that ZnFe2O4-TiO2 can retain the crystallinity of both nanoparticles. Electron diffraction pattern of CoFe2O4/TiO2 displayed the brightness of polymorphic discrete rings of the crystalline particles, suggesting quite a high degree of crystallinity in polycrystals. In this restudyearch, the obtained maximum saturation magnetization and coercivity of CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4/TiO2 nanocomposites were found to be 32.58, 29.64 emug−1 and 0.15, 0.05 kOe, respectively.

6. Solvothermal Method

The solvothermal technique employs a non-aqueous solvent and a considerably higher temperature, allowing high boiling point solvents to be utilized. The solvothermal method outperforms the hydrothermal method in terms of shape, size control, distribution, and crystallinity of nanoparticles [90][48]. Organic solvents, which have a low relative permittivity and are free of ionic species, are used in the solvothermal process to produce a product devoid of foreign anions and ionic species. The benefits of both the hydrothermal and sol–gel methods are combined in this technique. This approach may be utilized in the ceramics sector to regulate the particle size of synthesized materials and to fabricate tiny particles, such as magnetic titania photocatalyst [91][49]. Atacan et al. [92][50] developed ZnFe2O4/Ag-TiO2 by the solvothermal method. The formation, structure and morphology of prepared samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and vibrating sample magnetometry. In this restudyearch, the obtained value of saturation magnetization of ZnFe2O4/Ag-TiO2 was 5.5 emug−1. XRD patterns indicated that no chemical reaction occurred between ZnFe2O4 and Ag-TiO2, because no peaks related to other impurities were observed. Nguyen and Doong [93][51] synthesized ZnFe2O4/TiO2 heterostructure by this method.


  1. Katal, R.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Tanhaei, M.; Farahani, M.H.D.A.; Jiangyong, H. A Review on the Synthesis of the Various Types of Anatase TiO2 Facets and Their Applications for Photocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123384.
  2. Kim, C.-S.; Shin, J.-W.; Cho, Y.-H.; Jang, H.-D.; Byun, H.-S.; Kim, T.-O. Synthesis and Characterization of Cu/N-Doped Mesoporous TiO2 Visible Light Photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 455, 211–218.
  3. Min, K.S.; Kumar, R.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, K.S.; Lee, S.G.; Son, Y.-A. Synthesis of New TiO2/Porphyrin-Based Composites and Photocatalytic Studies on Methylene Blue Degradation. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 160, 37–47.
  4. Min, K.S.; Manivannan, R.; Son, Y.-A. Porphyrin Dye/TiO2 Imbedded PET to Improve Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity and Organosilicon Attachment to Enrich Hydrophobicity to Attain an Efficient Self-Cleaning Material. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 162, 8–17.
  5. Wu, Q.; Zhang, Z. The Preparation of Self-Floating Sm/N Co-Doped TiO2/Diatomite Hybrid Pellet with Enhanced Visible-Light-Responsive Photoactivity and Reusability. Adv. Powder Technol. 2019, 30, 415–422.
  6. Wang, G.; Ma, X.; Wei, S.; Li, S.; Qiao, J.; Wang, J.; Song, Y. Highly Efficient Visible-Light Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from a Novel Z-Scheme Er3+:YAlO3/Ta2O5-V5+||Fe3+-TiO2/Au Coated Composite. J. Power Sources 2018, 373, 161–171.
  7. Lee, H.U.; Lee, S.C.; Choi, S.; Son, B.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, J. Efficient Visible-Light Induced Photocatalysis on Nanoporous Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Dioxide Catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 756–764.
  8. Krasil’Nikov, V.N.; Shalaeva, E.V.; Baklanova, I.V.; Melkozerova, M.A.; Kuznetsov, M.V.; Zabolotskaya, E.V.; Gyrdasova, O.I.; Buldakova, L.Y.; Murzakaev, A.M. Synthesis, Structure and Spectroscopic Characteristics of Ti(O,C)2/Carbon Nanostructured Globules with Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2016, 39, 1569–1579.
  9. Ju, T.; Lee, H.; Kang, M. The Photovoltaic Efficiency of Dye Sensitized Solar Cell Assembled Using Carbon Capsulated TiO2 Electrode. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2636–2640.
  10. Chen, P.; Wang, F.; Chen, Z.-F.; Zhang, Q.; Su, Y.; Shen, L.; Yao, K.; Liu, Y.; Cai, Z.; Lv, W.; et al. Study on the Photocatalytic Mechanism and Detoxicity of Gemfibrozil by a Sunlight-Driven TiO2/Carbon Dots Photocatalyst: The Significant Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 204, 250–259.
  11. Surenjan, A.; Sambandam, B.; Pradeep, T.; Philip, L. Synthesis, Characterization and Performance of Visible Light Active C-TiO2 for Pharmaceutical Photodegradation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 757–767.
  12. Li, X.-W.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, X.; Lin, K.-F. Visible-Infrared Optical Properties Measurement of the Mesoporous TiO2/Carbon Materials. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 15638–15645.
  13. Wanag, A.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Kapica-Kozar, J.; Morawski, A.W. Photocatalytic Performance of Thermally Prepared TiO2/C Photocatalysts under Artificial Solar Light. Micro Nano Lett. 2016, 11, 202–206.
  14. Neville, E.M.; Ziegler, J.; Don MacElroy, J.M.; Ravindranathan Thampi, K.; Sullivan, J.A. Serendipity Following Attempts to Prepare C-Doped Rutile TiO2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 470, 434–441.
  15. Teh, C.Y.; Wu, T.Y.; Juan, J.C. An Application of Ultrasound Technology in Synthesis of Titania-Based Photocatalyst for Degrading Pollutant. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 317, 586–612.
  16. Reli, M.; Kobielusz, M.; Matějová, L.; Daniš, S.; Macyk, W.; Obalová, L.; Kuśtrowski, P.; Rokicińska, A.; Kočí, K. TiO2 Processed by Pressurized Hot Solvents as a Novel Photocatalyst for Photocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 282–287.
  17. Rahimi, N.; Pax, R.A.; Gray, E.; Mac, A. Review of Functional Titanium Oxides. I: TiO2 and Its Modifications. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2016, 44, 86–105.
  18. Mikrut, P.; Kobielusz, M.; Macyk, W. Spectroelectrochemical Characterization of Euhedral Anatase TiO2 Crystals—Implications for Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Properties of and Facets. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 310, 256–265.
  19. Surówka, M.; Kobielusz, M.; Trochowski, M.; Buchalska, M.; Kruczała, K.; Broś, P.; Macyk, W. Iron and Other Metal Species as Phase-Composition Controllers Influencing the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Materials. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 247, 173–181.
  20. Sadowski, R.; Wach, A.; Buchalska, M.; Kuśtrowski, P.; Macyk, W. Photosensitized TiO2 Films on Polymers—Titania-Polymer Interactions and Visible Light Induced Photoactivity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 475, 710–719.
  21. Karthik, K.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Phuruangrat, A.; Revathi, V.; Verma, U. Multifunctional Applications of Microwave-Assisted Biogenic TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 965–972.
  22. Mahdavi-Shakib, A.; Husremovic, S.; Ki, S.; Glynn, J.; Babb, L.; Sempel, J.; Stavrinoudis, I.; Arce-Ramos, J.-M.; Nelson, R.; Grabow, L.C.; et al. Titania Surface Chemistry and Its Influence on Supported Metal Catalysts. Polyhedron 2019, 170, 41–50.
  23. Fatima, R.; Afridi, M.N.; Kumar, V.; Lee, J.; Ali, I.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, J.-O. Photocatalytic Degradation Performance of Various Types of Modified TiO2 against Nitrophenols in Aqueous Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 899–912.
  24. Boro, B.; Gogoi, B.; Rajbongshi, B.M.; Ramchiary, A. Nano-Structured TiO2/ZnO Nanocomposite for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Application: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2264–2270.
  25. Akhter, P.; Farkhondehfal, M.A.; Hernández, S.; Hussain, M.; Fina, A.; Saracco, G.; Khan, A.U.; Russo, N. Environmental Issues Regarding CO2 and Recent Strategies for Alternative Fuels through Photocatalytic Reduction with Titania-Based Materials. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3934–3953.
  26. Ashraf, S.; Siddiqa, A.; Shahida, S.; Qaisar, S. Titanium-Based Nanocomposite Materials for Arsenic Removal from Water: A Review. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01577.
  27. Etacheri, V.; Michlits, G.; Seery, M.K.; Hinder, S.J.; Pillai, S.C. A Highly Efficient TiO2–xCx Nano-Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Visible Light Induced Antibacterial Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1663–1672.
  28. Di Valentin, C.; Pacchioni, G. Trends in Non-Metal Doping of Anatase TiO2: B, C, N and F. Catal. Today 2013, 206, 12–18.
  29. Zhang, L.; Wu, Y. Sol-Gel Synthesized Magnetic MnFe2O4 Spinel Ferrite Nanoparticles as Novel Catalyst for Oxidative Degradation of Methyl Orange. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 1–6.
  30. Tatarchuk, T.; Mironyuk, I.; Kotsyubynsky, V.; Shyichuk, A.; Myslin, M.; Boychuk, V. Structure, Morphology and Adsorption Properties of Titania Shell Immobilized onto Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticle Core. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 297, 111757.
  31. Dadfar, M.R.; Seyyed Ebrahimi, S.A.; Masoudpanah, S.M. Sol–Gel Synthesis and Characterization of SrFe12O19/TiO2 Nanocomposites. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2015, 28, 89–94.
  32. Xu, S.; Feng, D.; Shangguan, W. Preparations and Photocatalytic Properties of Visible-Light-Active Zinc Ferrite-Doped TiO2 Photocatalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 2463–2467.
  33. Lahijani, B.; Hedayati, K.; Goodarzi, M. Magnetic PbFe12O19-TiO2 Nanocomposites and Their Photocatalytic Performance in the Removal of Toxic Pollutants. Main Group Met. Chem. 2018, 41, 53–62.
  34. De Lucena, P.R.; Pessoa-Neto, O.D.; Dos Santos, I.M.G.; Souza, A.G.; Longo, E.; Varela, J.A. Synthesis by the Polymeric Precursor Method and Characterization of Undoped and Sn, Cr and V-Doped ZrTiO. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 397, 255–259.
  35. Mourão, H.A.J.L.; Malagutti, A.R.; Ribeiro, C. Synthesis of TiO2-Coated CoFe2O4 Photocatalysts Applied to the Photodegradation of Atrazine and Rhodamine B in Water. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 382, 284–292.
  36. Mohanty, P.; Mahapatra, R.; Padhi, P.; Ramana, C.V.V.; Mishra, D.K. Ultrasonic Cavitation: An Approach to Synthesize Uniformly Dispersed Metal Matrix Nanocomposites—A Review. Nano Struct. Nano Objects 2020, 23, 100475.
  37. Ley, S.V.; Low, C.M.R. Ultrasound in Synthesis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; p. 133.
  38. Ao, Y.; Xu, J.; Fu, D.; Shen, X.; Yuan, C. A Novel Magnetically Separable Composite Photocatalyst: Titania-Coated Magnetic Activated Carbon. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 61, 436–441.
  39. Jiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Gong, X.; Yan, F.; Zhang, Z. Sonochemical Synthesis and Characterization of Magnetic Separable Fe3O4-TiO2 Nanocomposites and Their Catalytic Properties. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2010, 1, 278–287.
  40. Rane, A.V.; Kanny, K.; Abitha, V.K.; Thomas, S. Synthesis of Inorganic Nanomaterials; Bhagyaraj, S.M., Oluwafemi, O.S., Kalarikkal, N., Thomas, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 121–139.
  41. Sathishkumar, P.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Anandan, S.; Ashokkumar, M. CoFe2O4/TiO2 Nanocatalysts for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Reactive Red 120 in Aqueous Solutions in the Presence and Absence of Electron Acceptors. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 302–310.
  42. Chandrika, M.; Ravindra, A.V.; Rajesh, C.; Ramarao, S.D.; Ju, S. Studies on Structural and Optical Properties of Nano ZnFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4-TiO2 Composite Synthesized by Co-Precipitation Route. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 230, 107–113.
  43. Haw, C.; Chiu, W.; Abdul Rahman, S.; Khiew, P.; Radiman, S.; Abdul Shukor, R.; Hamid, M.A.A.; Ghazali, N. The Design of New Magnetic-Photocatalyst Nanocomposites (CoFe2O4–TiO2) as Smart Nanomaterials for Recyclable-Photocatalysis Applications. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 1124–1136.
  44. Allaedini, G.; Tasirin, S.M.; Aminayi, P. Magnetic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite Synthesized by Hydrothermal Method. Int. Nano Lett. 2015, 5, 183–186.
  45. Aziz, A.A.; Puma, G.L.; Ibrahim, S.; Saravanan, P. Preparation, Characterisation and Solar Photoactivity of Titania Supported Strontium Ferrite Nanocomposite Photocatalyst. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2013, 8, 295–310.
  46. Nguyen, T.B.; Doong, R. Fabrication of Highly Visible-Light-Responsive ZnFe2O4/TiO2 Heterostructures for the Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dyes. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 103428–103437.
  47. Pongwan, P.; Inceesungvorn, B.; Phanichphant, S.; Kangwansupamonkon, W.; Wetchakun, N. Synthesis and Characterization of a Magnetically Separable CoFe2O4/TiO2 Nanocomposite for the Photomineralization of Formic Acid. Ferroelectrics 2013, 453, 133–140.
  48. Sun, J.; Fu, Y.; Xiong, P.; Sun, X.; Xu, B.; Wang, X. A Magnetically Separable P25/CoFe2O4/Graphene Catalyst with Enhanced Adsorption Capacity and Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 22490.
  49. Etacheri, V.; Di Valentin, C.; Schneider, J.; Bahnemann, D.; Pillai, S.C. Visible-Light Activation of TiO2 Photocatalysts: Advances in Theory and Experiments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2015, 25, 1–29.
  50. Atacan, K.; Güy, N.; Çakar, S. Preparation and Antibacterial Activity of Solvothermal Synthesized ZnFe2O4/Ag-TiO2 Nanocomposite. Sakarya Uni. J. Sci. 2018, 22, 1720–1726.
  51. Nguyen, T.B.; Doong, R. Heterostructured ZnFe2O4/TiO2 Nanocomposites with a Highly Recyclable Visible-Light-Response for Bisphenol A Degradation. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 50006–50016.