Interrelationship between COVID-19 and Coagulopathy: Comparison
View Latest Version
Please note this is a comparison between Version 2 by Jason Zhu and Version 1 by Beatrice Ragnoli.

Since the first description of COVID-19 infection, among clinical manifestations of the disease, including fever, dyspnea, cough, and fatigue, it was observed a high incidence of thromboembolic events potentially evolving towards acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19-associated-coagulopathy (CAC). The hypercoagulation state is based on an interaction between thrombosis and inflammation. The so-called CAC represents a key aspect in the genesis of organ damage from SARS-CoV-2. The prothrombotic status of COVID-19 can be explained by the increase in coagulation levels of D-dimer, lymphocytes, fibrinogen, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and prothrombin time. Several mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain this hypercoagulable process such as inflammatory cytokine storm, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis for a long time. 

  • COVID-19 infection
  • coagulopathy
  • endothelial dysfunction
  • platelet activation

1. Interlink between Coagulopathy in Viral Infections and in COVID-19

Since the beginning of the pandemic, a very high incidence of thrombo-embolic events (VTE) was observed. The hypercoagulative state, described in patients with COVID-19 derives from a complex inflammatory response to the virus in which hemostasis and the immune system collaborate together to limit the spread of viral infection. Physiological immune thrombosis can evolve into an excessive, dysregulated formation of immunologically mediated thrombi and spread, especially in the microcirculation. Several viral infections may share abnormal coagulation processes such as bleeding, thrombosis, or both.

1.1. Thrombosis

The increased incidence of VTE in COVID-19 patients was similar also in patients with other viral infections, i.e., severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) [50,51][1][2]. H1N1 influenza infection is associated with an 18-fold increased risk of developing VTE when compared to critically ill patients with ARDS with no H1N1 influenza infection [6][3]. A previous study by Avnon et al. found that VTE occurred in 25% of patients with severe H1N1 influenza admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [52][4]. Particular evidence for thromboembolic events was also reported during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in which two arterial thrombotic events were described in nine Israelitic immunocompetent CMV-infected patients (spleen and liver) [53][5]. The pathophysiological mechanism is yet unknown but it seems to be related to higher levels of VWF in the plasma of CMV-infected people [54][6]. It is likely that the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not have intrinsic procoagulant effects, while coagulopathy appears as a consequence of the intense COVID-19 inflammatory response and endothelial activation/damage [55][7]. Two possible mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of coagulation dysfunction during SARS-CoV2 infection have been proposed: the cytokine storm which seems to play a pivotal role, and virus-specific mechanisms related to the virus interaction with the renin–angiotensin system and the fibrinolytic pathway [56][8].

1.1.1. Cytokine Storm

Pro-inflammatory cytokines are involved in a so-called “cytokine release syndrome” responsible for the innate immune system activation and severe clinical manifestation of the disease [57][9]. Immune system dysfunction is a candidate risk factor for adverse outcomes in COVID-19, and the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from COVID-19 infection seems to be the cytokine storm causing an immune dysregulation in the peripheral tissues and in the lungs [58][10] (p. 2), refs. [57,59,60,61,62][9][11][12][13][14].
Current evidence from clinical studies shows that IL-6 seems to play a prominent role in the cytokine-induced activation of coagulation. Additionally, IL-6 promotes the proliferation of megakaryocytes [64][15] and the release of TF, the latter detected in inflamed tissues and in particular in the lungs of patients affected by COVID-19 [65][16]. A postulated mechanism considers that SARS-CoV-2-infected megakaryocytes may interfere with platelet function and count, as already described in previous studies that reported thrombocytopenia during SARS-CoV infection. The virus induces the release of cytokines such as IL-6 conducting to megakaryocytic proliferation and differentiation, although the mechanism remains not completely clarified [66,67][17][18].
Furthermore, vascular permeability is mediated by IL-6 through the stimulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion and the release of other coagulation factors such as FIB and factor VIII [68][19]. There was a great effort during the pandemic to find inflammatory markers reflecting disease severity and eventually predicting disease prognosis. Among the most studied, increased levels of a pivotal serum cytokine, IL-1, which is a principal source of tissue damage interacting in both innate and acquired immunity, have been detected in patients suffering from severe COVID-19 infection. IL-1 stimulates the secretion of mediators stored in the granules of mast cells and macrophages, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and the release of arachidonic acid products such as prostaglandins and thromboxane A2 [69,70,71,72][20][21][22][23]. Another important marker in the cytokine network of COVID-19 infection is IL-18. The catastrophic clinical course of COVID-19 shares similar features with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) encountered also in other conditions with a potentially rapidly fatal course without treatment. IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, interferon (IFN)-γ, and TNF-α are the most important elements responsible for MAS development. IL-18 is produced by macrophages at very early stages of viral infections and induces the production of IL-6 and IFN-γ which are considered critical for optimal viral host defense. A study by Satis and coworkers observed a four-fold level of IL-18 in 58 people suffering from a severe form of COVID-19. These findings contrasted with the mildly affected patients and led to the conclusion of a correlation between IL-18 and the severity of the disease [73][24]. An additional role is determined by TNF-α, responsible for the activation of glucuronidases, which degrades the endothelial glycocalyx, and the upregulation of hyaluronic acid synthase 2, which leads to hyaluronic acid deposition and fluid retention [74][25]. Due to the systemic hypoxia induced by COVID-19-related ARDS, a reduction in endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and nitric oxide levels has been indicated as a possible pathogenic process typical of endothelial dysfunction [75][26].

1.1.2. Virus-Specific Mechanisms

Experiments in vitro demonstrated that SARS-CoV2 can infect primary endothelial cells [76][27] and there is some evidence of the infection of endothelial cells in severe cases of COVID-19 [11][28]. Moreover, the replication within endothelial cells is able to induce cell death causing the activation of procoagulant reactions [77][29]. The membrane glycoprotein (Spike) of the SARS-CoV-2 virus interacts with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE-2), an integral membrane receptor expressed in the lung but also the heart, kidney, and intestine by reducing their activity. Normally, ACE-2 reduces the availability of angiotensin II through the counter-regulated activity of ACE [78][30].
The RAS may play a key role in SARS-CoV-2-induced COVID-19 [81][31]. The downregulation of ACE-2 by the virus causes an increase in angiotensin II, which, acting on the AT1 receptor, causes systemic injury [82][32] but also specific lung damage with pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary inflammation, and ARDS in severe cases of COVID-19 [83][33]. ACE-2 is markedly expressed in pneumocytes type II, hence participating in alveolar surfactant production. The downregulation of ACE-2 receptors due to the binding of coronavirus might hinder the expression of pneumocytes type II cells, explaining the worsening of gaseous exchange [84,85][34][35]. Overall, the interaction of coronavirus with ACE-2 receptors is destructive due to increased inflammatory lesions, the downregulation of ACE-2 receptors, increased local angiotensin II effects and AT1 receptor over-activity, insufficient surfactant due to bruised pneumocytes type II causing a reduction in pulmonary compliance and amplified surface tension, and a reduction in the generation and repair of pneumocytes type I with impaired gaseous exchange along with alveolar–capillary diffusion capacity and fibrosis [86][36]. Moreover, a different impact of SARS-CoV-2 expression on ACE-2 may be due to gender-related dissimilarities, with the ACE-2 gene existing in the X-chromosome [87][37]. The wide variances in COVID-19 death rates might be explained by significant alterations in the equilibrium of the ACE:ACE-2 system associated with gender, racial, and age differences in genetic ACE and ACE-2 polymorphism and environmental aspects manipulating ACE-2 expression [88,89,90][38][39][40]. In addition, the severity of lung injury is linked with the expression of ACE. ALI was less complicated in complete knockout (Acee/e) mice and AT1 receptor knockout mice compared to partial ACE knockout (Ace./e) mice and wild-type mice, respectively. The injection of recombinant SARS spike protein along with AT1 blockers elevated the expression of angiotensin II leading to ARDS in mice [91][41]. Thus, understanding the role of the ACE-2 receptor in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 may open a potential approach for therapeutic intervention [92][42].
Among virus-related mechanisms, high levels of PAI-1, the principal inhibitor of fibrinolysis interfering with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase, have been related to an increased risk of thromboembolic events [80][43]. Interestingly, previous studies reported high blood levels of PAI-1 in patients with SARS-CoV infection suggesting a possible direct effect of infection on the production of anti-coagulant factors [93][44]. One study described an important increase in another mediator of platelet adhesion, platelet-derived vitronectin (VN), in SARS-CoV pneumonia; however, it was not possible to discriminate its origin from increased expression by the liver or from lung damage [94][45]. Another possible virus-specific effect could be related to the induction of autoimmunity, also described in SARS patients [37][46]. Recent studies showed that the appearance of antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus anticoagulant immunoglobulins may have a role in the pathogenesis of coagulopathy. Indeed, the presence of IgA anti-cardiolipin antibodies and IgA and IgG anti-2-glycoprotein I antibodies have been found in association with coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and the development of peripheral and cerebral ischemic events. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), recognized as risk factors for arterial and venous thrombosis, have been associated with different viral infections, such as parvovirus B19, herpes viruses, hepatitis viruses, and human immunodeficiency viruses. The first case report of a COVID-19 patient with aPL and arterial ischemia was described by Chinese authors [95][47], although, subsequently, a larger, multicentric cohort demonstrated a low rate of aPL positivity, as defined by classification criteria, suggesting that aPL found in COVID-19 patients is different from aPL found in antiphospholipid syndrome [96][48]. It is likely that the mechanisms of altered coagulation due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, also responsible for hypoxia, may in turn favor the thrombo-inflammatory loop and consequently increased blood viscosity and the release of procoagulant antibodies [32][49]. These observations were confirmed by a study by Harzallah and coworkers investigating 56 patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these, 25 were found with lupus anticoagulant immunoglobulin, whereas 5 were found positive for IgM or IgG anti-cardiolipin or anti-2-glycoprotein I antibodies [33][50]. Further studies are needed to address this issue.

1.2. Thrombocytopenia

COVID-19-related coagulopathy firstly determines elevated D-dimer levels that combine in turn with mildly prolonged PT, APTT, and mild thrombocytopenia. At late stages, this process evolves into a classical DIC [97][51]. These findings were identified in the clinical setting in a meta-analysis where 7.613 patients suffering from COVID-19 infection were examined. In this cohort, thrombocytopenia was worse in the critically ill group than in those with non-severe disease [98][52]. Additionally, the platelet count was lower in the elderly, in males, and in patients with higher APACHE II scores at admission [99][53]. This study highlights an association between low platelet counts and an increased risk of severity of the disease and mortality. As per SARS-CoV-2-infection-related thrombocytopenia, it appears that the platelets can be more rapidly removed or sequestrated by the reticuloendothelial system after the activation of antigen–antibody complexes [100,101][54][55]. Additionally, the megakaryocyte’s function and the consequent platelet production can be reduced by the virus activity [102][56]. A possible mechanism of thrombocytopenia was described after COVID-19 vaccination. It was observed in rare cases that immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) syndrome was induced by the vaccine, particularly the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. The main pathogenetic hypothesis supporting this evidence is the possible promotion of antibody synthesis against PF4 by some anti-COVID vaccines promoting the synthesis of antibodies against PF4 that provoke platelets’ massive activation, inducing immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia [103][57]. As anti-PF4 antibodies were detected in patients with VITT, the current guidelines recommend a PF4-heparin ELISA blood test before performing a vaccine when VITT is clinically suspected [104][58]. The risk of clotting in the general population is estimated to be around 1:250,000, although it is higher in young people (20–29 years old) at 1.1:100,000 [105][59].

2. Contribution of Sepsis in Coagulopathy during COVID-19 Infection

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition as a response to a primary infection in which the body responds with extreme inflammatory reactions that create injuries in one’s own tissues and organs. On the other hand, severe COVID-19 infection is commonly complicated with coagulopathy, and, in the latter stages, may evolve towards a classical DIC. These manifestations were an object of major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) has proposed a new category to identify an early stage of DIC associated with sepsis called sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC). Many patients suffering from severe COVID-19 meet the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) [106][60] manifesting respiratory dysfunction during a viral infection.

Coagulation Biomarkers in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Predictive Method

In the setting of the altered coagulation state, the measurements of the coagulative parameters may orient the clinicians toward the early identification of a coagulative derangement. Besides the D-dimer, as above mentioned, other parameters are of bedside interest. Increased levels of thrombin–antithrombin complexes, plasmin-alpha-2-antiplasmin, and thrombomodulin complexes have been reported in respiratory tract infections. Increased PAI-1 serum levels were identified, suggesting impaired fibrinolysis. A study [15][61] highlighted an alteration of the laboratory parameters deponent for DIC (according to the diagnostic criteria of the ISTH) in 15 subjects (71.4%) who died of COVID-19-related pneumopathy. In the final stage of the disease, elevated levels of D-dimer and FIB degradation products were found. Recent contributions have reported that COVID-19 severity could be associated with some coagulopathy biomarkers, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and D-dimer. Nevertheless, the association between coagulopathy and COVID-19 severity still remains undefined.
The severity of the condition is mostly associated with clinical evidence. In particular, one study [109][62] demonstrated that the majority of patients developed a mild infection, and about 15% of them experienced a severe manifestation with dyspnea and hypoxia. Another 5% developed respiratory failure in conjunction with ARDS, shock, and multi-organ dysfunction. Many studies have focused on the evaluation of D-dimer, PLT, PT, APTT, and FIB. It was reported that D-dimer and PT values have been shown to be higher in patients with more severe disease [110][63]; moreover, several studies have shown that elevated D-dimer levels are associated with in-hospital mortality. Recent research studies have hypothesized that genetic profiles may partly explain individual differences in developing thrombotic complications during COVID-19 infection. An interesting study evaluated the genotypic distribution of targeted DNA polymorphisms in COVID-19 complicated by pulmonary embolism during hospitalization, finding significant associations between higher D-dimer levels and ACE I/D and APOE T158C polymorphism in patients with and without pulmonary embolism, suggesting a potentially useful marker of poor clinical outcomes [111][64]. Previous data showed a higher prevalence of ACE D/D genotype in severe COVID-19 patients compared to those with mild disease; this genotype is significantly associated with cardiometabolic diseases and obesity, known risk factors for COVID-19 [112,113,114,115][65][66][67][68]. Additionally, this genotype was associated with thrombo-embolic manifestations in patients affected by other diseases and traditional thrombophilia-related polymorphisms [116][69], increased venous thromboembolism risk [117[70][71],118], and endothelial damage with hypercoagulability in patients with arterial hypertension [119][72]. The APOE locus has been associated with increased vulnerability to severe COVID-19 mortality, especially for the APOE4 homozygous genotype [120][73] which is the strongest genetic risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. This appears to be very important from a clinical point of view as recent data show that dementia can predict the severity of COVID-19 infection. In fact, patients with dementia are more exposed to the severe form of the infection and are more likely to require hospitalization and to have severe sequelae or fatal outcomes compared with patients who do not [5,121][74][75]. Finally, the racial variance of ACE I/D genotype polymorphism seems to be correlated with different outcomes during COVID-19 infection; in fact, populations with higher D allele frequency (e.g., Italian) experienced higher fatality [122][76]. In another meta-analysis, it was demonstrated that the platelet count decreased progressively with the degree of disease severity [123][77]. However, a previous meta-analysis [124][78] demonstrated that there were no differences in PLT and APTT levels between wild and severe cases. All this is probably due to the confounding factors and biases that inevitably occur, such as age, sex, and the presence of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease of the examined populations. As reported in another study by Wu et al., mortality from severe COVID-19 was increased 34-fold compared to a normal infection [125][79] and very high levels of coagulation markers were correlated with an 11-fold increase in death. These observations underline the importance of the early stratification of disease severity.

3. New Clinical Evidence of Anticoagulant Therapy in COVID-19

Data on anticoagulant therapy appear to be associated with a better outcome in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients with altered coagulative parameters (elevated D-dimer, elevated FIB, and low levels of anti-thrombin) [13,14,132][80][81][82]. A retrospective study by Shi et al. showed that these treatments can mitigate cytokine storm exerting an anti-inflammatory effect (reduction in IL-6 and increase in lymphocytes) and improving coagulation dysfunction [133][83]. A number of substances are used for COVID-19 VTE such as heparins, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAK), aggregation inhibitors, factor XII inhibitors, thrombolytic agents, anti-complement, anti-NET drugs, and IL-1 receptor antagonists.
Heparins, including unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), have several anti-coagulant and anti-inflammatory effects [134][84]. Among the various properties of heparin, a beneficial effect on endothelium has been observed. Dysfunctional endothelium leads to an inflammatory status through the production of vasoconstrictor factors and the recruitment of immune cells [135][85]. Histones released from damaged cells may be responsible for endothelial injury [136][86]. Heparin exerts its action through an effect on histone methylation and MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways [137][87]. In this way, heparin can antagonize histones and therefore “protect” the endothelium [29,30][88][89]. It was proved to have a beneficial effect related to its anticoagulant function on COVID-19 [138][90] and anti-inflammatory properties [139][91]. The proposed mechanisms include binding to inflammatory cytokines, the inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis and leukocyte migration, the neutralization of complement factor C5a, the sequestration of acute-phase proteins such as P-selectin and L-selectin, and the induction of cell apoptosis through the TNF-α and NF-κB pathways [140,141][92][93]. Another potential direct antiviral role of heparin is related to its polyanionic properties allowing it to bind to various proteins thus acting as an effective inhibitor of viral adhesion [142][94]. This condition mechanism was also described in other viral diseases [142,143][94][95] as well as in SARS-CoV. As Mycroft-West et al. [144][96] demonstrated, surface plasmon resonance and circular dichroism were used, and it was demonstrated that the receptor binding domain of the Spike S1 SARS-CoV-2 protein interacts with heparin. In a report by Tang [15][61], a favorable outcome was highlighted with the use of LMWHs in severe patients with COVID-19 who meet the criteria of SCI (sepsis-induced coagulopathy) or with markedly elevated D-dimer. A large, retrospective multicentric study among in-hospital patients (the CORIST study) showed that heparin treatment was associated with lower mortality, particularly in severely ill COVID-19 patients and in those with strong coagulation activation [145][97]. Moreover, research conducted in the neurorehabilitation department of a neuroscience referral hospital following neurological damage showed, despite a small number of patients, that hospitalized, vulnerable, patients with severe neurological damage can present a completely unexpected benign disease course of SARS-CoV-2 infection after heparin treatment. The anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin administered much earlier before and during the infection, together with possible antiviral activity, could explain the favorable disease course observed in severe neurological patients with an increased risk of poor outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the possible mechanisms of action of enoxaparin in critical neurological patients with COVID-19 and confirm these observations [146][98].
The contact activation system, including factor XII (FXII), factor XI (FXI), high-molecular-weight kininogen, and prekallikrein, links inflammation and coagulation, triggering thrombin generation which promotes platelet activation but also upregulates the kallikrein–kinin system (KKS) which induces the renin–angiotensin system with the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [155][99]. The inhibition of contact activation has been shown, especially in animal models, to prevent consumptive coagulopathy, pathologic systemic inflammatory response, and mortality [156][100]. Direct FXa inhibitors have been already shown to possess an inflammatory and antiviral effect in addition to their well-established anticoagulant activity, and they have been proposed to have a potential therapeutic role in coronavirus infections [157][101]. FXI activation by virtue of its position as an interface between contact activation and thrombin generation has been suggested as a unique and promising target to safely prevent or treat COVID-19-related inflammatory complications including cytokine response and coagulopathy, hence reducing associated mortality, and, evidence from recent research suggests that the inhibition of FXIa seems to attenuate thrombosis with little effect on hemostasis and may also have a potential role on infections [158][102]. Direct inhibitors of FXIa using small peptidomimetic molecules, monoclonal antibodies, aptamers, or natural inhibitors have been developed in recent years [159][103]. Preclinical data and rationale exist for preventing the activation of FXI and FXII preserving the hemostatic activity of FXI in COVID-19, and several inhibitors of FXII and FXI are currently under investigation [158][102] representing a promising therapeutic target against COVID-19 patients with severe disease.

References

  1. Spyropoulos, A.C.; Levy, J.H.; Ageno, W.; Connors, J.M.; Hunt, B.J.; Iba, T.; Levi, M.; Samama, C.M.; Thachil, J.; Giannis, D.; et al. Scientific and Standardization Committee communication: Clinical guidance on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1859–1865.
  2. Giannis, D.; Ziogas, I.A.; Gianni, P. Coagulation disorders in coronavirus infected patients: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and lessons from the past. J. Clin. Virol. Off. Publ. Pan Am. Soc. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104362.
  3. Obi, A.T.; Tignanelli, C.J.; Jacobs, B.N.; Arya, S.; Park, P.K.; Wakefield, T.W.; Henke, P.K.; Napolitano, L.M. Empirical systemic anticoagulation is associated with decreased venous thromboembolism in critically ill influenza A H1N1 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2019, 7, 317–324.
  4. Avnon, L.S.; Munteanu, D.; Smoliakov, A.; Jotkowitz, A.; Barski, L. Thromboembolic events in patients with severe pandemic influenza A/H1N1. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 26, 596–598.
  5. Fridlender, Z.G.; Khamaisi, M.; Leitersdorf, E. Association between cytomegalovirus infection and venous thromboembolism. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2007, 334, 111–114.
  6. Kahn, S.R.; Lim, W.; Dunn, A.S.; Cushman, M.; Dentali, F.; Akl, E.A.; Cook, D.J.; Balekian, A.A.; Klein, R.C.; Le, H.; et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012, 141, e195S–e226S.
  7. Connors, J.M.; Levy, J.H. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood 2020, 135, 2033–2040.
  8. Lazzaroni, M.G.; Piantoni, S.; Masneri, S.; Garrafa, E.; Martini, G.; Tincani, A.; Andreoli, L.; Franceschini, F. Coagulation dysfunction in COVID-19: The interplay between inflammation, viral infection and the coagulation system. Blood Rev. 2021, 46, 100745.
  9. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J.; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034.
  10. Liu, B.; Li, M.; Zhou, Z.; Guan, X.; Xiang, Y. Can we use interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced cytokine release syndrome (CRS)? J. Autoimmun. 2020, 111, 102452.
  11. Moore, J.B.; June, C.H. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 2020, 368, 473–474.
  12. Qin, C.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Tao, Y.; Xie, C.; Ma, K.; Shang, K.; Wang, W.; et al. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2020, 71, 762–768.
  13. Ye, Q.; Wang, B.; Mao, J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 607–613.
  14. Zhang, C.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.-W.; Zhao, H.; Wang, G.-Q. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19: Interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab may be the key to reduce mortality. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105954.
  15. Folman, C.C.; Linthorst, G.E.; van Mourik, J.; van Willigen, G.; de Jonge, E.; Levi, M.; de Haas, M.; von dem Borne, A.E. Platelets release thrombopoietin (Tpo) upon activation: Another regulatory loop in thrombocytopoiesis? Thromb. Haemost. 2000, 83, 923–930.
  16. Levi, M.; van der Poll, T.; Schultz, M. Systemic versus localized coagulation activation contributing to organ failure in critically ill patients. Semin. Immunopathol. 2012, 34, 167–179.
  17. Fox, S.E.; Akmatbekov, A.; Harbert, J.L.; Li, G.; Quincy Brown, J.; Vander Heide, R.S. Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: An autopsy series from New Orleans. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 681–686.
  18. Yang, M.; Ng, M.H.; Li, C.K. Thrombocytopenia in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (review). Hematology 2005, 10, 101–105.
  19. Stouthard, J.M.; Levi, M.; Hack, C.E.; Veenhof, C.H.; Romijn, H.A.; Sauerwein, H.P.; van der Poll, T. Interleukin-6 stimulates coagulation, not fibrinolysis, in humans. Thromb. Haemost. 1996, 76, 738–742.
  20. Conti, P.; Caraffa, A.; Gallenga, C.E.; Ross, R.; Kritas, S.K.; Frydas, I.; Younes, A.; Ronconi, G. Coronavirus-19 (SARS-CoV-2) induces acute severe lung inflammation via IL-1 causing cytokine storm in COVID-19: A promising inhibitory strategy. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 1971–1975.
  21. Magro, G. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: Is interleukin-6 (IL-6) the “culprit lesion” of ARDS onset? What is there besides Tocilizumab? SGP130Fc. Cytokine X 2020, 2, 100029.
  22. van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Netea, M.G. Blocking IL-1 to prevent respiratory failure in COVID-19. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 445.
  23. Zhao, Y.; Qin, L.; Zhang, P.; Li, K.; Liang, L.; Sun, J.; Xu, B.; Dai, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. Longitudinal COVID-19 profiling associates IL-1RA and IL-10 with disease severity and RANTES with mild disease. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e139834.
  24. Satış, H.; Özger, H.S.; Aysert Yıldız, P.; Hızel, K.; Gulbahar, Ö.; Erbaş, G.; Aygencel, G.; Guzel Tunccan, O.; Öztürk, M.A.; Dizbay, M.; et al. Prognostic value of interleukin-18 and its association with other inflammatory markers and disease severity in COVID-19. Cytokine 2021, 137, 155302.
  25. Teuwen, L.-A.; Geldhof, V.; Pasut, A.; Carmeliet, P. COVID-19: The vasculature unleashed. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 389–391.
  26. Martini, R. The compelling arguments for the need of microvascular investigation in COVID-19 critical patients. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2020, 75, 27–34.
  27. Monteil, V.; Kwon, H.; Prado, P.; Hagelkrüys, A.; Wimmer, R.A.; Stahl, M.; Leopoldi, A.; Garreta, E.; Hurtado Del Pozo, C.; Prosper, F.; et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Engineered Human Tissues Using Clinical-Grade Soluble Human ACE2. Cell 2020, 181, 905–913.e7.
  28. Varga, Z.; Flammer, A.J.; Steiger, P.; Haberecker, M.; Andermatt, R.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Mehra, M.R.; Schuepbach, R.A.; Ruschitzka, F.; Moch, H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, 1417–1418.
  29. Stern, D.; Nawroth, P.; Handley, D.; Kisiel, W. An endothelial cell-dependent pathway of coagulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 2523–2527.
  30. Guang, C.; Phillips, R.D.; Jiang, B.; Milani, F. Three key proteases—Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE), ACE2 and renin—Within and beyond the renin-angiotensin system. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012, 105, 373–385.
  31. El-Arif, G.; Farhat, A.; Khazaal, S.; Annweiler, C.; Kovacic, H.; Wu, Y.; Cao, Z.; Fajloun, Z.; Khattar, Z.A.; Sabatier, J.M. The Renin-Angiotensin System: A Key Role in SARS-CoV-2-Induced COVID-19. Molecules 2021, 26, 6945.
  32. Yang, J.; Petitjean, S.J.L.; Koehler, M.; Zhang, Q.; Dumitru, A.C.; Chen, W.; Derclaye, S.; Vincent, S.P.; Soumillion, P.; Alsteens, D. Molecular interaction and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4541.
  33. Reid, C.; Laird, B.; Travers, S.; McNiff, J.; Young, S.; Maddicks, J.; Bentley, A.; Fenning, S. Death from COVID-19: Management of breathlessness: A retrospective multicentre study. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2021.
  34. Barkauskas, C.E.; Cronce, M.J.; Rackley, C.R.; Bowie, E.J.; Keene, D.R.; Stripp, B.R.; Randell, S.H.; Noble, P.W.; Hogan, B.L.M. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 3025–3036.
  35. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8.
  36. Rivellese, F.; Prediletto, E. ACE2 at the centre of COVID-19 from paucisymptomatic infections to severe pneumonia. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102536.
  37. Gemmati, D.; Bramanti, B.; Serino, M.L.; Secchiero, P.; Zauli, G.; Tisato, V. COVID-19 and Individual Genetic Susceptibility/Receptivity: Role of ACE1/ACE2 Genes, Immunity, Inflammation and Coagulation. Might the Double X-Chromosome in Females Be Protective against SARS-CoV-2 Compared to the Single X-Chromosome in Males? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3474.
  38. Patel, S.K.; Wai, B.; Ord, M.; MacIsaac, R.J.; Grant, S.; Velkoska, E.; Panagiotopoulos, S.; Jerums, G.; Srivastava, P.M.; Burrell, L.M. Association of ACE2 Genetic Variants With Blood Pressure, Left Ventricular Mass, and Cardiac Function in Caucasians With Type 2 Diabetes. Am. J. Hypertens. 2012, 25, 216–222.
  39. Luo, Y.; Liu, C.; Guan, T.; Li, Y.; Lai, Y.; Li, F.; Zhao, H.; Maimaiti, T.; Zeyaweiding, A. Association of ACE2 genetic polymorphisms with hypertension-related target organ damages in south Xinjiang. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 681–689.
  40. Arnold, R.H. COVID-19—Does This Disease Kill Due to Imbalance of the Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) Caused by Genetic and Gender Differences in the Response to Viral ACE 2 Attack? Heart Lung Circ. 2020, 29, 964–972.
  41. Liu, M.-Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.-P. Role and mechanism of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in acute lung injury in coronavirus disease 2019. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 2020, 6, 98–105.
  42. Shirbhate, E.; Pandey, J.; Patel, V.K.; Kamal, M.; Jawaid, T.; Gorain, B.; Kesharwani, P.; Rajak, H. Understanding the role of ACE-2 receptor in pathogenesis of COVID-19 disease: A potential approach for therapeutic intervention. Pharmacol. Rep. PR 2021, 73, 1539–1550.
  43. Marshall, R.P. The Pulmonary Renin-Angiotensin System. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 715–722.
  44. Wu, Y.P.; Wei, R.; Liu, Z.H.; Chen, B.; Lisman, T.; Ren, D.L.; Han, J.J.; Xia, Z.L.; Zhang, F.S.; Xu, W.B.; et al. Analysis of thrombotic factors in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients. Thromb. Haemost. 2006, 96, 100–101.
  45. Reheman, A.; Gross, P.; Yang, H.; Chen, P.; Allen, D.; Leytin, V.; Freedman, J.; Ni, H. Vitronectin stabilizes thrombi and vessel occlusion but plays a dual role in platelet aggregation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 3, 875–883.
  46. Goeijenbier, M.; van Wissen, M.; van de Weg, C.; Jong, E.; Gerdes, V.E.A.; Meijers, J.C.M.; Brandjes, D.P.M.; van Gorp, E.C.M. Review: Viral infections and mechanisms of thrombosis and bleeding. J. Med. Virol. 2012, 84, 1680–1696.
  47. Zhang, Y.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, S.; Xia, P.; Cao, W.; Jiang, W.; Chen, H.; Ding, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, H.; et al. Coagulopathy and Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, e38.
  48. Borghi, M.O.; Beltagy, A.; Garrafa, E.; Curreli, D.; Cecchini, G.; Bodio, C.; Grossi, C.; Blengino, S.; Tincani, A.; Franceschini, F.; et al. Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19 Are Different From Those Detectable in the Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 584241.
  49. Kichloo, A.; Dettloff, K.; Aljadah, M.; Albosta, M.; Jamal, S.; Singh, J.; Wani, F.; Kumar, A.; Vallabhaneni, S.; Khan, M.Z. COVID-19 and Hypercoagulability: A Review. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2020, 26, 1076029620962853.
  50. Harzallah, I.; Debliquis, A.; Drénou, B. Lupus anticoagulant is frequent in patients with COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 2064–2065.
  51. Gómez-Mesa, J.E.; Galindo-Coral, S.; Montes, M.C.; Muñoz Martin, A.J. Thrombosis and Coagulopathy in COVID-19. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2021, 46, 100742.
  52. Li, Q.; Cao, Y.; Chen, L.; Wu, D.; Yu, J.; Wang, H.; He, W.; Chen, L.; Dong, F.; Chen, W.; et al. Hematological features of persons with COVID-19. Leukemia 2020, 34, 2163–2172.
  53. Liu, Y.; Sun, W.; Guo, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, S.; Long, D.; Yu, L. Association between platelet parameters and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019: Retrospective cohort study. Platelets 2020, 31, 490–496.
  54. Chabert, A.; Hamzeh-Cognasse, H.; Pozzetto, B.; Cognasse, F.; Schattner, M.; Gomez, R.M.; Garraud, O. Human platelets and their capacity of binding viruses: Meaning and challenges? BMC Immunol. 2015, 16, 26.
  55. Assinger, A. Platelets and infection—An emerging role of platelets in viral infection. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 649.
  56. Seyoum, M.; Enawgaw, B.; Melku, M. Human blood platelets and viruses: Defense mechanism and role in the removal of viral pathogens. Thromb. J. 2018, 16, 16.
  57. Aleem, A.; Nadeem, A.J. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT). In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570605/ (accessed on 20 April 2023).
  58. Oldenburg, J.; Klamroth, R.; Langer, F.; Albisetti, M.; von Auer, C.; Ay, C.; Korte, W.; Scharf, R.E.; Pötzsch, B.; Greinacher, A. Diagnosis and Management of Vaccine-Related Thrombosis following AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccination: Guidance Statement from the GTH. Hamostaseologie 2021, 41, 184–189.
  59. Miller, E. Rapid evaluation of the safety of COVID-19 vaccines: How well have we done? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 477–478.
  60. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.-D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810.
  61. Tang, N.; Bai, H.; Chen, X.; Gong, J.; Li, D.; Sun, Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1094–1099.
  62. Rahman, S.; Montero, M.T.V.; Rowe, K.; Kirton, R.; Kunik, F. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19: A review of current evidence. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 14, 601–621.
  63. Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Jiao, H.; Liu, X. Coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging 2020, 12, 24535–24551.
  64. Fiorentino, G.; Benincasa, G.; Coppola, A.; Franzese, M.; Annunziata, A.; Affinito, O.; Viglietti, M.; Napoli, C. Targeted genetic analysis unveils novel associations between ACE I/D and APO T158C polymorphisms with D-dimer levels in severe COVID-19 patients with pulmonary embolism. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2023, 55, 51–59.
  65. Annunziata, A.; Coppola, A.; Di Spirito, V.; Cauteruccio, R.; Marotta, A.; Micco, P.D.; Fiorentino, G. The Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Deletion/Deletion Genotype Is a Risk Factor for Severe COVID-19: Implication and Utility for Patients Admitted to Emergency Department. Medicina 2021, 57, 844.
  66. Calabrese, C.; Annunziata, A.; Coppola, A.; Pafundi, P.C.; Guarino, S.; Di Spirito, V.; Maddaloni, V.; Pepe, N.; Fiorentino, G. ACE Gene I/D Polymorphism and Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Potential Predisposing Role. Front. Med. 2021, 7, 631148. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2020.631148 (accessed on 14 May 2023).
  67. Gómez, J.; Albaiceta, G.M.; García-Clemente, M.; López-Larrea, C.; Amado-Rodríguez, L.; Lopez-Alonso, I.; Hermida, T.; Enriquez, A.I.; Herrero, P.; Melón, S.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE, ACE2) gene variants and COVID-19 outcome. Gene 2020, 762, 145102.
  68. Sarangarajan, R.; Winn, R.; Kiebish, M.A.; Bountra, C.; Granger, E.; Narain, N.R. Ethnic Prevalence of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Deletion (D) Polymorphism and COVID-19 Risk: Rationale for Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2021, 8, 973–980.
  69. Güngör, Y.; Kayataş, M.; Yıldız, G.; Özdemir, Ö.; Candan, F. The presence of PAI-1 4G/5G and ACE DD genotypes increases the risk of early-stage AVF thrombosis in hemodialysis patients. Ren. Fail. 2011, 33, 169–175.
  70. Di Tano, G.; Dede, M.; Pellicelli, I.; Martinelli, E.; Moschini, L.; Calvaruso, E.; Danzi, G.B. Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia on adequate oral anticoagulation. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2022, 53, 576–580.
  71. Lubbe, L.; Cozier, G.E.; Oosthuizen, D.; Acharya, K.R.; Sturrock, E.D. ACE2 and ACE: Structure-based insights into mechanism, regulation and receptor recognition by SARS-CoV. Clin. Sci. 1979 2020, 134, 2851–2871.
  72. Makris, T.K.; Stavroulakis, G.A.; Dafni, U.G.; Gialeraki, A.E.; Krespi, P.G.; Hatzizacharias, A.N.; Tsoukala, C.G.; Vythoulkas, J.S.; Kyriakidis, M.K. ACE/DD genotype is associated with hemostasis balance disturbances reflecting hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction in patients with untreated hypertension. Am. Heart J. 2000, 140, 760–765.
  73. Kuo, C.-L.; Pilling, L.C.; Atkins, J.L.; Masoli, J.A.H.; Delgado, J.; Kuchel, G.A.; Melzer, D. APOE e4 Genotype Predicts Severe COVID-19 in the UK Biobank Community Cohort. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2020, 75, 2231–2232.
  74. Ragnoli, B.; Cena, T.; Radaeli, A.; Pochetti, P.; Conti, L.; Calareso, A.; Morjaria, J.; Malerba, M. Pneumothorax in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure: Risk factors and outcome. Respir. Med. 2023, 211, 107194.
  75. Ghaffari, M.; Ansari, H.; Beladimoghadam, N.; Aghamiri, S.H.; Haghighi, M.; Nabavi, M.; Mansouri, B.; Mehrpour, M.; Assarzadegan, F.; Hesami, O.; et al. Neurological features and outcome in COVID-19: Dementia can predict severe disease. J. Neurovirol. 2021, 27, 86–93.
  76. Worldmeters.info. Available online: https://www.worldmeters.info/coronavirus/#countries (accessed on 14 May 2023).
  77. Xiang, G.; Hao, S.; Fu, C.; Hu, W.; Xie, L.; Wu, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, X. The effect of coagulation factors in 2019 novel coronavirus patients. Medicine 2021, 100, e24537.
  78. Xiong, M.; Liang, X.; Wei, Y.-D. Changes in blood coagulation in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 189, 1050–1052.
  79. Wu, Z.; McGoogan, J.M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020, 323, 1239–1242.
  80. Tang, N.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 844–847.
  81. Han, H.; Yang, L.; Liu, R.; Liu, F.; Wu, K.-L.; Li, J.; Liu, X.-H.; Zhu, C.-L. Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020, 58, 1116–1120.
  82. Carfora, V.; Spiniello, G.; Ricciolino, R.; Di Mauro, M.; Migliaccio, M.G.; Mottola, F.F.; Verde, N.; Coppola, N.; Coppola, N.; Sagnelli, C.; et al. Anticoagulant treatment in COVID-19: A narrative review. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 51, 642–648.
  83. Shi, C.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Cai, F.; Zeng, F.; Cheng, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Deng, B.; et al. The potential of low molecular weight heparin to mitigate cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients: A retrospective clinical study. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2020, 13, 1087–1095.
  84. Godino, C.; Scotti, A.; Maugeri, N.; Mancini, N.; Fominskiy, E.; Margonato, A.; Landoni, G. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with COVID-19? -Rationale and Evidence-. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 324, 261–266.
  85. Mangana, C.; Lorigo, M.; Cairrao, E. Implications of Endothelial Cell-Mediated Dysfunctions in Vasomotor Tone Regulation. Biologics 2021, 1, 231–251.
  86. Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Pelayo, R.; Monestier, M.; Ammollo, C.T.; Semeraro, F.; Taylor, F.B.; Esmon, N.L.; Lupu, F.; Esmon, C.T. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1318–1321.
  87. Zhang, X.; Li, X. The Role of Histones and Heparin in Sepsis: A Review. J. Intensive Care Med. 2022, 37, 319–326.
  88. JCI Insight—The Complement System in COVID-19: Friend and Foe? Available online: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/140711 (accessed on 20 April 2023).
  89. Gupta, N.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Evans, C.E. The stimulation of thrombosis by hypoxia. Thromb. Res. 2019, 181, 77–83.
  90. Mangiafico, M.; Caff, A.; Costanzo, L. The Role of Heparin in COVID-19: An Update after Two Years of Pandemics. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3099.
  91. Mousavi, S.; Moradi, M.; Khorshidahmad, T.; Motamedi, M. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Heparin and Its Derivatives: A Systematic Review. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 2015, 507151.
  92. Thachil, J. The versatile heparin in COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1020–1022.
  93. Oduah, E.I.; Linhardt, R.J.; Sharfstein, S.T. Heparin: Past, Present, and Future. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 38.
  94. Shukla, D.; Spear, P.G. Herpesviruses and heparan sulfate: An intimate relationship in aid of viral entry. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 503–510.
  95. Ghezzi, S.; Cooper, L.; Rubio, A.; Pagani, I.; Capobianchi, M.R.; Ippolito, G.; Pelletier, J.; Meneghetti, M.C.Z.; Lima, M.A.; Skidmore, M.A.; et al. Heparin prevents Zika virus induced-cytopathic effects in human neural progenitor cells. Antivir. Res. 2017, 140, 13–17.
  96. Mycroft-West, C.; Su, D.; Elli, S.; Guimond, S.; Miller, G.; Turnbull, J.; Yates, E.; Guerrini, M.; Fernig, D.; Lima, M.; et al. The 2019 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) surface protein (Spike) S1 Receptor Binding Domain undergoes conformational change upon heparin binding. BioRxiv 2020.
  97. Di Castelnuovo, A.; Costanzo, S.; Antinori, A.; Berselli, N.; Blandi, L.; Bonaccio, M.; Cauda, R.; Guaraldi, G.; Menicanti, L.; Mennuni, M.; et al. Heparin in COVID-19 Patients Is Associated with Reduced In-Hospital Mortality: The Multicenter Italian CORIST Study. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 121, 1054–1065.
  98. Gennaro, F.D. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Outcome in Neuro-rehabilitation patients hospitalized at Neuroscience Hospital in Italy: SARS-CoV-2 in severe neurological patients. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 12, e2020063.
  99. Bikdeli, B.; Madhavan, M.V.; Gupta, A.; Jimenez, D.; Burton, J.R.; Der Nigoghossian, C.; Chuich, T.; Nouri, S.N.; Dreyfus, I.; Driggin, E. Pharmacological Agents Targeting Thromboinflammation in COVID-19: Review and Implications for Future Research. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 120, 1004–1024.
  100. Silasi, R.; Keshari, R.S.; Lupu, C.; Van Rensburg, W.J.; Chaaban, H.; Regmi, G.; Shamanaev, A.; Shatzel, J.J.; Puy, C.; Lorentz, C.U.; et al. Inhibition of contact-mediated activation of factor XI protects baboons against S aureus-induced organ damage and death. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 658–669.
  101. Al-Horani, R.A. Potential Therapeutic Roles for Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors in Coronavirus Infections. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs Drugs Devices Interv. 2020, 20, 525–533.
  102. Shatzel, J.J.; DeLoughery, E.P.; Lorentz, C.U.; Tucker, E.I.; Aslan, J.E.; Hinds, M.T.; Gailani, D.; Weitz, J.I.; McCarty, O.J.T.; Gruber, A. The contact activation system as a potential therapeutic target in patients with COVID-19. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 4, 500–505.
  103. Koulas, I.; Spyropoulos, A.C. A Review of FXIa Inhibition as a Novel Target for Anticoagulation. Hamostaseologie 2023, 43, 28–36.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Video Production Service
Feedback