In the last decades, natural or synthetic polymers have made a significant difference in painting, cosmetics, bio-imaging, trade, and medicine. The contributions of polymer science and engineering to healthcare applications are showing promise. These polymers have many advantages in drug delivery applications, such as being biodegradable, biocompatible, simple to eliminate from the body, minimizing the number of doses needed, maintaining the drug concentration level in the optimal range, and making patients more likely to take their medicine because the polymer coat hides the organoleptic characteristics of the formulation. According to literature studies, each polymer has some unique properties that permit the fabrication of nanotechnology-based formulation with a controlled size distribution, solubility, flexibility, and permeation for the intended application.
These properties are crucial in the development of novel polymeric carriers for the preparation of nanocarrier coating test masking site-specific release time-dependent release accomplished using multiple types of polymers to alter the release pattern or modify the release kinetics in therapeutic drug delivery application. To deliver the drug at target sites, the drug was enclosed in a polymeric shell matrix. However, some polymers have a few limitations, such as being non-compatible with active ingredients, non-biodegradable, and toxic; to overcome these problems, there is a growing concern for the synthesis of polymer by modern polymerization method with catalysis. In recent years, Eudragit has proven to be one of the most attractive areas of research due to the importance of its advanced drug delivery system. Rohm & Hass GmbH, Darmstadt, first introduced Eudragit in 1953 as an acid-resistant, alkaline-soluble drug coating functional material. Eudragit is a brand name marketed primarily by Evonik Technologies Germany.
2. Classification of Eudragit Polymer
Many different grades of Eudragit polymer usually available are granules, dry powder, organic solvent, and aqueous dispersion forms. A mixture of acetone and isopropanol in a ratio of 40:60 is highly used as the organic solvent. The chemical compositions, characteristic feature of different types of Eudragit, are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1. Classification of polymethacrylate based on polymeric grades.
In this table, there are four main classes of Eudragit polymers listed: cationic Eudragit E (used for taste masking and soluble below pH 5.5), anionic Eudragit L & S (used for colon targeting/enteric coating and soluble above pH 6 and 7), neutral Eudragit RL & RS (quaternary ammonium group) polymers (both of which possess pH-independent solubility), and Eudragit NE & NM are swellable and permeable for sustained release application
[3].
3. Characterization of Eudragit
Glass transition temperature, X-ray particle diffraction, DSC, FT-IR, physiological buffer differential, and pH-sensitive properties distinguish Eudragit grades. As indicated in
Table 2, a differential thermal study of these polymers indicates a single thermal start as the glass transition temperature, which is characteristic of the various Eudragit grades. The glass transition temperature affects pharmaceutical dosage from storage conditions, film production, melt processing, etc. Due to the amorphous Eudragit structure, it exhibits prolonged release. Small molecules of drugs, solvents, or plasticizers lower the glass transition temperature; these properties are important for pharmaceutical applications. Triethyl citrate is used as the main plasticizer in Eudragit
[4][5][4,5]. X-ray powder diffractograms of Eudragit S 100, L 100, RS, and RL are shown in
Figure 1. Based on the literature study, Eudragit grades indicate the amorphous nature of the polymers
[6][7][6,7]. TGA curves with DSC thermograms of the Eudragit L30D, L as well as S are explained in
Figure 2. Here,
reswe
archers can see thermal characteristics of the Eudragit L30D, L, and S from DSC curves appeared to be compatible with the reflectance data by DSC/FT-IR microspectroscopy.
Figure 3 are presented three-dimension FT-IR spectra of Eudragit L30D, L, and S. The spectral ranges of these three polymers appear at 3100 and 2850 cm
−1, 1800 and 1650 cm
−1, and 1350 and 900 cm
−1. The C-H starching bend peak range is between 3100 and 2850 cm
−1, the C=O stretching vibration groups is between 1800 and 1650 cm
−1, and C-O stretching vibration mode is between 1350 and 900 cm
−1 [8][9][8,9]. The diffraction of all these Eudragit grades shows a halo(gaussian), suggesting that the polymers are amorphous, as seen in
Figure 1.
Figure 1. X-ray diffractogram of various Eudragit polymers, Eudragit L 100, S 100, Eudragit RL, and Eudragit RS.
Figure 2.
Temperature dependencies of the FT-IR peak intensity for the various IR bands of Eudragits L, S, and L30D. (
A
) Eudragit L; (
B
) Eudragit S; (
C
) Eudragit L30D.
Figure 3.
Three-dimensional plots of reflectance FT-IR spectra of Eudragits L, S, and respect to temperature. (
A
) Eudragit L; (
B
) Eudragit S; (
C
) Eudragit L30D.
Table 2. Glass transition temperature of Eudragit with various grades.
4. Synthesis of Eudragit Polymer
Although gastrointestinal drug release is the ideal drug delivery route, there are several problems when the medicine is injected into the digestive system. Limitation such as reduction in drug bioavailability is observed during drug transport through the gastrointestinal mucosa
[10][11][10,11]. In general, drug delivery on the oral mucosa is difficult because of a constant flow of saliva and mobility of the tissue, limiting the residence time of drugs administrated to the oral cavity. The size of a buccal dosage form is restricted by the very limited area available for the application of the delivery system. This size restriction, in turn, limits the amount of drugs that can be incorporated into the dosage forms
[12]. In order to improve intestinal drug transport, Haupstein et al. synthesized preactivated thiolated Eudragit L100-55 (
Scheme 1)
[13].
Scheme 1. Synthesis of preactivated thiolated Eudragit L100-55.
The authors prepared preactivated thiolated poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethyl acrylate) (Eudragit L100-55) in two synthetic steps. In the beginning, commercially available Eudragit L100-55 was thiolated using L-cysteine through the covalent bond formation. Later, the inactivated thiol moieties were preactivated using a disulfide bond junction through the addition of 2-mercaptonicotinic acid to produce the desired target product. Various precursor compounds were formulated with different amounts of L-cysteine (particularly 60, 140, and 266
μmol/g polymer) and different amounts of preactivation, such as 33, 45, and 51 µmol/g polymer. Tensile-based mucoadhesion studies resulted in 30.5, 35.3-, and 52.2-times adhesion enhancement, respectively, for preactivated Eudragit polymers. As a result, both water uptake, as well as prolonged dissolution time increased at a pH value of 6.8. The rise in mucoadhesion was attributed to the insertion of an aromatic ligand in the preactivated Eudragit polymer (
Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. One-step synthetic scheme for the preparation of thiolated Eudragit.
In an effort to transfer mucosal vaccination of protein to mucosal immune cells as part of the nasal vaccine delivery approach, Li et al. developed mannan-functionalized thiolated Eudragit microspheres in the year 2015
[14]. The commercially available Eudragit L100 was mixed with
N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, and
N-hydroxysuccinimide in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solvent and stirred for one day. Further, L-cysteine hydrochloride was added to the reaction solution, which resulted in thiolated Eudragit after 2 days of stirring (
Scheme 3). Mannan-functionalized Eudragit microspheres increased receptor-triggered endocytosis in the antigen-presenting cells through mannose receptor stimulation.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of dye-anchored Eudragit polymers.
Perez-Ibarbia et al. prepared colored polymers
[15] of Eudragit L 100-55 utilizing a blue cationic dye called toluidine blue (TB) and 2-methoxy-
N-4-phenyl-1,4-phenylenediamine (MPPD) in the presence of coupling agents such as 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI). The authors observed well-correlated results of polymer dissolution rate with drug release. Additionally, stable solutions of dyed polymers devoid of coagulation or sedimentation were achieved after optimizing a different set of formulation studies. In vitro studies of dye-based polymers suggested no toxicity in comparison to non-modified polymers (
Scheme 4).
Scheme 4. Scheme for the synthesis of PEGylated Eudragit L100 polymer.
Kim et al. synthesized PEGylated Eudragit L100 polymer in two synthetic steps utilizing the most common EDC coupling in DMF. The first step involves the preparation of activated (EL-NHS ester) Eudragit L100, which subsequently reacts with mPEG-NH2 2000 or 5000 in DMF, resulting in EL-PEG 2000 and EL-PEG 5000, respectively. Further, the authors developed celecoxib-loaded proliponiosomes in order to enhance the oral delivery of the anti-inflammatory drug celecoxib. Celecoxib is essentially a non-steroidal COX-2 inhibitor. Lyophilization of celecoxib, ELP, nonionic surfactants, and phospholipid yielded amorphous solid dispersions called celecoxib-loaded proliponiosomes. The dissolution rate, as well as permeability, improved significantly in the case of celecoxib-loaded proliponiosomes in comparison to the only celecoxib suspension. Enhanced oral bioavailability was also noticed when in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation was carried out on rat species using celecoxib-loaded proliponiosomes (
Scheme 5)
[16].
Scheme 5. Synthesis of anisamide-based Eudragit polymer.
Thymoquinone, a phytochemical compound, could be used for targeting colon cancer. Ramzy et al. prepared thymoquinone-based polymeric nanocapsules through nanoprecipitation where pH-sensitive Eudragit S100 acted as polymeric shell (
Scheme 6). Eudragit S100 reacted with an anisamide derivative in the presence of N,N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) to give the desired anisamide target product for sigma receptors. In vitro analysis suggested the delayed release of thymoquinone from the nanocapsules. Additionally, the polymeric nanocapsules exhibited greater cytotoxicity response in HT29 cell lines with sigma receptor overexpression.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of Acrylated Eudragit polymer.
Porfiryeva et al. developed acrylated EPO using acryloyl chloride in a single-step process. The authors confirmed the degree of acrylation using permanganatometric titration. The non-irritant properties of the synthesized acrylated polymer were evaluated using a slug mucosal irritation test. The excellent mucoadhesive response was noticed on nasal mucosa tissue in comparison to non-acrylated EPO. In another study led by Prof. Moustafine and Prof. Van den Mooter developed inter-polyelectrolyte complex utilizing two different countercharged polymers such as Eudragit EPO and Eudragit L100, within the pH range of 6–7
[17][18][19][17,18,19]. The in vitro swelling and drug release studies indicated that the polyelectrolyte complexes could be used for oral drug delivery. The same group also investigated inter-polyelectrolyte complex where a combination of Eudragit EPO and Eudragit S100 copolymer were tested for delivering indomethacin drug candidates. These particulate systems were able to safeguard the drug candidate from an acidic environment in the stomach
[20].
Three different types of polymerization routes are discussed at the bottom.
4.1. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization
Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) is normally known as a transition-metal-assisted atom transfer reaction. ATRP deals with a monomer, an initiator (composed of a movable halogen group), and a catalyst (consists of a transition metal-based ligand); hence, it is considered a multicomponent system
[21]. Organic derivatives such as acrylates, acrylamides, styrenes, acrylonitrile, etc., are suitable radical stabilizers during polymer synthesis and are used as monomers in ATRP reactions.
In the ATRP process, the active moieties (radicals) are produced through a transition-metal-catalyzed reversible redox reaction (
Scheme 7). The process involves one electron oxidation as well as the detachment of halogen species from the inactive reactant. The combination of intermediate radicals with monomers results in the propagation of the polymer chain through kp (rate constant for propagation).
Scheme 7. General mechanism for transition-metal-catalyzed ATRP.
4.2. Reversible Addition–Fragmentation
Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization is the most diverse tool to develop various functional block copolymers as it can tolerate functional monomer diversity as well as a wide variety of reaction media
[22]. The synthetic process involved in RAFT polymerization is comparatively small and easy to use. Thiocarbonylthio group is a well-known chain transfer (RAFT) agent, which accelerates degenerative chain transfer in the process. Most of the chains in the RAFT polymerization contain a terminal thiocarbonylthio group, as in the case of polymer b. In other words, a monomer unit is installed between the SR bond of the chain transfer agent to produce the polymer. The mechanism of the RAPT polymerization process is shown in
Scheme 8.
Scheme 8. Mechanism of basic equilibria process involved during RAFT polymerization.
4.3. Chain Transfer Polymerization
Interestingly, various polymer chains per catalyst propagate during chain transfer polymerization from catalyst1 to the chain transfer agent (
Scheme 9)
[23]. The chain transfer occurs fast in terms of propagation and is also reversible in nature. Additionally, no other termination pathways, such as βH abstraction, take place during the polymerization process. Chain transfer metal present in the macromolecular chain facilitates chemical functionalization.
Scheme 9. Process involving chain transfer polymerization. * Scheme represented the Coordinative Chain Transfer Polymerization a process involving a dynamical equilibrium between propagating and dormant species.